This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_000904_TTUQ1b1x1_1102499_aTsrYC4P
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 11.2137 2461171.7137 10.29 11:37:52.54 +02:10:33.1
264.58990 59.45586 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 2.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.20 Massalia -0 1 1 10.5 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 11:37:52.54 +02:10:33.1: 15.39 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 11:37:52.54 +02:10:33.1: 15.46 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 11.2137* 11 37 52.54 +02 10 33.1 10.3 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461171.7137,10.29,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260511.2137 10.29CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 11.2137 2461171.7137 12.10 11:02:12.84 +05:11:49.6
248.18327 55.98275 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 2.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.19 Fortuna -0 0 1 12.4 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 11:02:12.84 +05:11:49.6: 15.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 11:02:12.84 +05:11:49.6: 15.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 11.2137* 11 02 12.84 +05 11 49.6 12.1 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461171.7137,12.10,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260511.2137 12.10CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 11.2137 2461171.7137 12.20 11:23:25.05 +06:19:17.8
253.79732 60.49858 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 2.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.65 Cybele 0 1 1 12.3 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 11:23:25.05 +06:19:17.8: 15.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 11:23:25.05 +06:19:17.8: 15.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 11.2137* 11 23 25.05 +06 19 17.8 12.2 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461171.7137,12.20,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260511.2137 12.20CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 11.2137 2461171.7137 12.99 11:08:27.83 +01:36:36.5
254.53788 54.50344 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 2.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.120 Lachesis -1 0 1 13.0 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 11:08:27.83 +01:36:36.5: 15.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 11:08:27.83 +01:36:36.5: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 11.2137* 11 08 27.83 +01 36 36.5 13.0 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461171.7137,12.99,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260511.2137 12.99CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 11.2137 2461171.7137 13.10 10:50:03.08 +04:18:39.2
245.79754 53.14429 galactic Sex Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.1" and 2.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.270 Anahita -1 1 1 13.3 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 10:50:03.08 +04:18:39.2: 15.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 10:50:03.08 +04:18:39.2: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 11.2137* 10 50 03.08 +04 18 39.2 13.1 U Sex 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461171.7137,13.10,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260511.2137 13.10CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 11.2137 2461171.7137 13.29 10:40:39.76 +07:29:33.8
239.20883 53.32646 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 2.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.356 Liguria -1 1 1 13.4 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 10:40:39.76 +07:29:33.8: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 10:40:39.76 +07:29:33.8: 15.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 11.2137* 10 40 39.76 +07 29 33.8 13.3 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461171.7137,13.29,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260511.2137 13.29CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 11.2137 2461171.7137 13.59 11:15:25.36 +04:16:27.5
253.64255 57.64456 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 2.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.453 Tea -0 0 0 13.8 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 11:15:25.36 +04:16:27.5: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 11:15:25.36 +04:16:27.5: 16.06 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 11.2137* 11 15 25.36 +04 16 27.5 13.6 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461171.7137,13.59,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260511.2137 13.59CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 11.2137 2461171.7137 13.79 11:36:00.35 +04:02:25.5
261.68779 60.72130 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 2.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.207 Hedda -1 1 1 14.0 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 11:36:00.35 +04:02:25.5: 15.75 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 11:36:00.35 +04:02:25.5: 15.78 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 11.2137* 11 36 00.35 +04 02 25.5 13.8 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461171.7137,13.79,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260511.2137 13.79CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 11.2137 2461171.7137 13.73 11:02:41.64 +03:59:02.7
249.87916 55.22898 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 2.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.189 Phthia -0 1 1 13.9 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 11:02:41.64 +03:59:02.7: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 11:02:41.64 +03:59:02.7: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 11.2137* 11 02 41.64 +03 59 02.7 13.7 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461171.7137,13.73,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260511.2137 13.73CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 11.2137 2461171.7137 13.96 10:58:28.46 +10:34:45.8
239.38943 58.69782 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.7" and 2.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.140 Siwa -0 1 1 13.7 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 10:58:28.46 +10:34:45.8: 15.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 10:58:28.46 +10:34:45.8: 15.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 11.2137* 10 58 28.46 +10 34 45.8 14.0 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461171.7137,13.96,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260511.2137 13.96CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 11.2137 2461171.7137 14.10 10:40:21.79 +07:25:06.9
239.23490 53.22271 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 2.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.136 Austria -1 2 2 14.2 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 10:40:21.79 +07:25:06.9: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 10:40:21.79 +07:25:06.9: 15.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 11.2137* 10 40 21.79 +07 25 06.9 14.1 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461171.7137,14.10,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260511.2137 14.10CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 11.2137 2461171.7137 14.19 11:01:06.44 +08:56:50.9
242.62521 58.22854 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 2.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.90 Antiope -0 1 1 14.3 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 11:01:06.44 +08:56:50.9: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 11:01:06.44 +08:56:50.9: 16.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 11.2137* 11 01 06.44 +08 56 50.9 14.2 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461171.7137,14.19,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260511.2137 14.19CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 11.2137 2461171.7137 14.74 11:20:40.30 +01:51:22.1
258.37961 56.66137 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.3" and 2.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.327 Columbia -0 0 1 14.9 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 11:20:40.30 +01:51:22.1: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 11:20:40.30 +01:51:22.1: 15.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 11.2137* 11 20 40.30 +01 51 22.1 14.7 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461171.7137,14.74,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260511.2137 14.74CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461146.72985719 16.04.2026 05:30:49.661 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
First image: 2461146.72985719 16.04.2026 05:30:49.661 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
Last image: 2461171.71401839 11.05.2026 05:08:01.189 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_000904_TTUQ1b1x1_1102499_aTsrYC4P/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 4
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.59
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 2 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 5779
Objects passed selection criteria: 5776
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 5594.25
Average stars matched: 5423.75 (96.9522 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 111784 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun May 10 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-44-gd532a530
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-10)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon May 11 00:10:09 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461146.72985719 16.04.2026 05:30:49.661 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
First image: 2461146.72985719 16.04.2026 05:30:49.661 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
Last image: 2461171.71401839 11.05.2026 05:08:01.189 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_000904_TTUQ1b1x1_1102499_aTsrYC4P/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 282
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.32
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 10 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 32147
Objects passed selection criteria: 32057
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 31015
Average stars matched: 29417 (94.8477 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 133452 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun May 10 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-44-gd532a530
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-10)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon May 11 00:11:32 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_000904_TTUQ1b1x1_1102499_aTsrYC4P/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-07-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_000904_TTUQ1b1x1_1102499_aTsrYC4P/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_000904_TTUQ1b1x1_1102499_aTsrYC4P/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-07-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_000904_TTUQ1b1x1_1102499_aTsrYC4P/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461171.71337237
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_000904_TTUQ1b1x1_1102499_aTsrYC4P/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-07-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_000904_TTUQ1b1x1_1102499_aTsrYC4P/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-07-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_000904_TTUQ1b1x1_1102499_aTsrYC4P/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_000904_TTUQ1b1x1_1102499_aTsrYC4P/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_000904_TTUQ1b1x1_1102499_aTsrYC4P/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-07-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_000904_TTUQ1b1x1_1102499_aTsrYC4P/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-07-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_000904_TTUQ1b1x1_1102499_aTsrYC4P/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_000904_TTUQ1b1x1_1102499_aTsrYC4P/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_000904_TTUQ1b1x1_1102499_aTsrYC4P/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_000904_TTUQ1b1x1_1102499_aTsrYC4P/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
The guess is 605 arcmin.
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_000904_TTUQ1b1x1_1102499_aTsrYC4P/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-07-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-07-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_000904_TTUQ1b1x1_1102499_aTsrYC4P/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-07-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
The guess is 605 arcmin.
util/wcs_image_calibration.sh: line 129: echo: write error: Broken pipe
No image with WCS calibration found for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_000904_TTUQ1b1x1_1102499_aTsrYC4P/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits .... Determining astrometry method...
No image with WCS calibration found for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_000904_TTUQ1b1x1_1102499_aTsrYC4P/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-07-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits .... Determining astrometry method...
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net software...
Choosing aperture...
Using the catalog image00004.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_000904_TTUQ1b1x1_1102499_aTsrYC4P/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net software...
Choosing aperture...
Using the catalog image00003.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_000904_TTUQ1b1x1_1102499_aTsrYC4P/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-07-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
The guess is 570 arcmin.
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_000904_TTUQ1b1x1_1102499_aTsrYC4P/lib/make_outxyls_for_astrometric_calibration found 5152 high-SNR stars for plate solving
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
The guess is 573 arcmin.
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits was not found.
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_000904_TTUQ1b1x1_1102499_aTsrYC4P/lib/make_outxyls_for_astrometric_calibration found 5149 high-SNR stars for plate solving
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
This service uses tools provided by Astrometry.net.
For more information visit http://astrometry.net/
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
verification OK: wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
######### Trying to solve plate assuming 605' field of view #########
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_000904_TTUQ1b1x1_1102499_aTsrYC4P/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net code
verification OK: wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
This service uses tools provided by Astrometry.net.
For more information visit http://astrometry.net/
IMAGE_SIZE= --width 9576 --height 6388 SCALE_LOW=544.5 SCALE_HIGH=3025.0
Using solve-field binary
/usr/local/astrometry/bin/solve-field
######### Trying to solve plate assuming 605' field of view #########
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_000904_TTUQ1b1x1_1102499_aTsrYC4P/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-07-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net code
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out1107963.xyls"...
IMAGE_SIZE= --width 9576 --height 6388 SCALE_LOW=544.5 SCALE_HIGH=3025.0
Using solve-field binary
/usr/local/astrometry/bin/solve-field
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out1107959.xyls"...
Generating wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat from image00002.cat
Generating wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat from image00001.cat
Catalog wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
Catalog wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
verification OK: wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
verification OK: wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:08:39.011 +05:58:19.41 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
Image size: 937.3'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:08:37.871 +05:58:55.04 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 5979 stars ###
'wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_000904_TTUQ1b1x1_1102499_aTsrYC4P/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky1108396.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
### Converted positions of 6014 stars ###
'wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_000904_TTUQ1b1x1_1102499_aTsrYC4P/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky1108401.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading file "./out1107959.axy"...
Reading file "./out1107963.axy"...
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4119.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4119.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4118.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4118.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4117.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4117.fits, field objects 1-10).
log-odds ratio 203.016 (1.47538e+88), 19 match, 0 conflict, 2 distractors, 22 index.
RA,Dec = (167.123,6.03913), pixel scale 5.97548 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++++++++-++-+++++(best)-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
log-odds ratio 203.254 (1.87178e+88), 19 match, 0 conflict, 2 distractors, 22 index.
RA,Dec = (167.127,6.04087), pixel scale 5.97548 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++++++++-++-+++++(best)-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Field 1: solved with index index-4116.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out1107963.solved to indicate this.
Field 1: solved with index index-4116.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out1107959.solved to indicate this.
Field: out1107963.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (167.112297, 6.044866) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (11:08:26.951, +06:02:41.517).
Field size: 15.7924 x 10.5744 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -176.443 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Inserting WCS header... Field: out1107959.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (167.116442, 6.046599) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (11:08:27.946, +06:02:47.756).
Field size: 15.7924 x 10.5744 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -176.443 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Inserting WCS header... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_000904_TTUQ1b1x1_1102499_aTsrYC4P/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits' -> 'fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_000904_TTUQ1b1x1_1102499_aTsrYC4P/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-07-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits' -> 'fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-07-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits'
WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M May 11 00:10 fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-07-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K May 11 00:10 out1107959.wcs
Inserting WCS header (1st iteration local)... -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M May 11 00:10 fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K May 11 00:10 out1107963.wcs
Inserting WCS header (1st iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-07-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-07-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits)... done!
Opening FITS image file fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits)... done!
done!
done!
All done!
done
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_000904_TTUQ1b1x1_1102499_aTsrYC4P/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits (fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits)
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration01' / astrometry.net run
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out1107963.xyls"...
All done!
done
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_000904_TTUQ1b1x1_1102499_aTsrYC4P/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-07-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits (fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-07-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits)
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration01' / astrometry.net run
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out1107959.xyls"...
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading file "./out1107963.axy"...
Only searching for solutions within 15.7233 degrees of RA,Dec (167.111,6.04409)
log-odds ratio 203.016 (1.47538e+88), 19 match, 0 conflict, 2 distractors, 22 index.
RA,Dec = (167.123,6.03913), pixel scale 5.97548 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++++++++-++-+++++(best)-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading file "./out1107959.axy"...
Only searching for solutions within 15.7233 degrees of RA,Dec (167.116,6.04582)
Field 1: solved with index index-4116.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out1107963.solved to indicate this.
Field: out1107963.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (167.112678, 6.044639) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (11:08:27.043, +06:02:40.701).
Field size: 15.7789 x 10.5779 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -176.436 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
log-odds ratio 203.254 (1.87178e+88), 19 match, 0 conflict, 2 distractors, 22 index.
RA,Dec = (167.127,6.04087), pixel scale 5.97548 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++++++++-++-+++++(best)-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M May 11 00:10 fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K May 11 00:10 out1107963.wcs
Inserting WCS header (2nd iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits)... done!
done!
Field 1: solved with index index-4116.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out1107959.solved to indicate this.
Field: out1107959.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (167.116832, 6.046380) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (11:08:28.040, +06:02:46.969).
Field size: 15.7789 x 10.5778 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -176.436 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M May 11 00:10 fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-07-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K May 11 00:10 out1107959.wcs
Inserting WCS header (2nd iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-07-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-07-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits)... done!
done!
All done!
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors.
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration02' / astrometry.net run
The field of view is large: we'll try to run Astromety.net code on the image itself rather than a star list
Reading input file "wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits"...
Found an existing WCS header, will try to verify it.
Extracting sources...
All done!
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors.
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration02' / astrometry.net run
The field of view is large: we'll try to run Astromety.net code on the image itself rather than a star list
Reading input file "wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-07-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits"...
Found an existing WCS header, will try to verify it.
Extracting sources...
simplexy: found 24139 sources.
simplexy: found 24330 sources.
Solving...
Solving...
Reading file "./wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-07-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.axy"...
Verifying WCS using indices with quads of size [63.7498, 955.648] arcmin
Reading file "./wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135.axy"...
Verifying WCS using indices with quads of size [63.7506, 955.66] arcmin
Verifying WCS with index 39 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4117.fits)
Verifying WCS with index 39 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4117.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 8.01091
Verifying WCS with index 40 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4116.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 6.63712
Verifying WCS with index 40 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4116.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 127.644 (2.72242e+55), 22 match, 0 conflict, 312 distractors, 22 index.
RA,Dec = (167.118,6.04716), pixel scale 5.98777 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ----+---------+----------------------+-------------+-------+----------+---------+-+----------------+
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 114.993 (8.72338e+49), 22 match, 0 conflict, 328 distractors, 22 index.
RA,Dec = (167.114,6.04542), pixel scale 5.98785 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -----+---------------+---------------+------------------------+--+-+------------+----------+-------+
--> log-odds 114.993
Verifying WCS with index 41 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4115.fits)
--> log-odds 127.644
Verifying WCS with index 41 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4115.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 330.646 (3.96215e+143), 41 match, 0 conflict, 339 distractors, 43 index.
RA,Dec = (167.114,6.04542), pixel scale 5.98785 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ---+-+-+-----------+-+---------------+-+---+------------+-----+-++-+--------+---+-------+--+-------+
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 323.289 (2.5283e+140), 41 match, 0 conflict, 346 distractors, 43 index.
RA,Dec = (167.118,6.04716), pixel scale 5.98777 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ----++--------+--------+-------+-----+---+---------+----+--+----+-----+---------+-+-----+---+------+
--> log-odds 330.646
Verifying WCS with index 42 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4114.fits)
--> log-odds 323.289
Verifying WCS with index 42 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4114.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 859.183 (inf), 90 match, 0 conflict, 321 distractors, 92 index.
RA,Dec = (167.114,6.04542), pixel scale 5.98785 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: --++-++++-----+----+++++---+-------+++-+---+----------+-+-----+-++++-+------+---+----+--+--+------++
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 853.978 (inf), 90 match, 0 conflict, 314 distractors, 92 index.
RA,Dec = (167.118,6.04716), pixel scale 5.98777 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: --+-+++---+--++-----+-++--+----+---+++-+-+---------+--+-+--+----+--+--+---------+-+--+--+---+-+---++
--> log-odds 859.183
Verifying WCS with index 43 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4113.fits)
--> log-odds 853.978
Verifying WCS of field 1.
Verifying WCS with index 43 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4113.fits)
log-odds ratio 1772.16 (inf), 183 match, 0 conflict, 236 distractors, 188 index.
RA,Dec = (167.114,6.04542), pixel scale 5.98785 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++++++++++-+++-++-+++++++-+--+-+-++++++++-+---+++---+++++-++++-++++-++--+-++-+-++-+++++++++--+---++
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 1766.32 (inf), 183 match, 0 conflict, 239 distractors, 188 index.
RA,Dec = (167.118,6.04716), pixel scale 5.98777 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++-+++-+-+++++-+--++++++-+---+++--++++++++----+--++-+++++++-++-++++--++--+-+++-+++--++-++--+-+---++
--> log-odds 1772.16
Verifying WCS with index 44 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4112.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 3260.72 (inf), 356 match, 0 conflict, 548 distractors, 364 index.
RA,Dec = (167.114,6.04542), pixel scale 5.98785 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-++++++-++++++++-+++-+++++++++++++++++++++-+++++-++++++++++++++++++-+-++++
--> log-odds 1766.32
Verifying WCS with index 44 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4112.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 3268.9 (inf), 357 match, 0 conflict, 580 distractors, 364 index.
RA,Dec = (167.118,6.04716), pixel scale 5.98777 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++-+++++-++++++++-+++++++++++++++++++++++++++-++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-+++++++++++-+++++++-++++
--> log-odds 3260.72
Verifying WCS with index 45 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4111.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 6086.15 (inf), 718 match, 0 conflict, 852 distractors, 729 index.
RA,Dec = (167.114,6.04542), pixel scale 5.98785 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
--> log-odds 3268.9
Verifying WCS with index 45 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4111.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 6093.07 (inf), 718 match, 0 conflict, 1007 distractors, 729 index.
RA,Dec = (167.118,6.04716), pixel scale 5.98777 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
--> log-odds 6086.15
Verifying WCS with index 46 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4110.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 11175.4 (inf), 1436 match, 1 conflict, 4216 distractors, 1455 index.
RA,Dec = (167.114,6.04542), pixel scale 5.98785 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
--> log-odds 6093.07
Verifying WCS with index 46 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4110.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 11188.6 (inf), 1435 match, 1 conflict, 4177 distractors, 1454 index.
RA,Dec = (167.118,6.04716), pixel scale 5.98777 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
--> log-odds 11175.4
Got 7 solutions.
--> log-odds 11188.6
Field: wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (167.111668, 6.044818) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (11:08:26.800, +06:02:41.346).
Field size: 15.7741 x 10.576 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -176.434 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Creating new FITS file "./wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135.new"...
Got 7 solutions.
Field: wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-07-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (167.115836, 6.046563) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (11:08:27.801, +06:02:47.626).
Field size: 15.7741 x 10.5759 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -176.434 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Creating new FITS file "./wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-07-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.new"...
renamed 'wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135.new' -> 'wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits'
renamed 'wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-07-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.new' -> 'wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-07-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits'
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-07-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-07-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-07-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-07-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits was not found.
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_000904_TTUQ1b1x1_1102499_aTsrYC4P/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-07-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_000904_TTUQ1b1x1_1102499_aTsrYC4P/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-07-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
Generating wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-07-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.cat from image00003.cat
Generating wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits.cat from image00004.cat
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-07-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-07-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-07-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-07-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:08:27.588 +06:02:44.82 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
Image size: 941.4'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:08:26.588 +06:02:38.54 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 5264 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_000904_TTUQ1b1x1_1102499_aTsrYC4P/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky1144009.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
### Converted positions of 5272 stars ###
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
'wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-07-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_000904_TTUQ1b1x1_1102499_aTsrYC4P/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky1144002.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-07-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits'
wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits'
wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-07-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-07-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-07-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-07-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits'
wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:08:37.871 +05:58:55.04 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-07-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-07-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:08:27.588 +06:02:44.82 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:08:37.871 +05:58:55.04
Second-epoch image center 11:08:27.588 +06:02:44.82
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0767 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:08:26.588 +06:02:38.54 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:08:37.871 +05:58:55.04
Second-epoch image center 11:08:26.588 +06:02:38.54
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0777 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
ref2=wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
new1=wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-07-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
new2=wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
reference average sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
INFO: WCS quality sigma_overall_arcsec not available for comparison (1st new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality sigma_overall_arcsec not available for comparison (2nd new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio not available for comparison (1st new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio not available for comparison (2nd new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 11:08:27.588 +06:02:44.82
Second-epoch second image center 11:08:26.588 +06:02:38.54
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00450 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits &> /tmp/tmp.G3uwThcWeP
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits &> /tmp/tmp.cp8F6w4ldz
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_000904_TTUQ1b1x1_1102499_aTsrYC4P/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-07-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits &> /tmp/tmp.6BiEhIqY3G
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_000904_TTUQ1b1x1_1102499_aTsrYC4P/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-07-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_000904_TTUQ1b1x1_1102499_aTsrYC4P/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits &> /tmp/tmp.WNxoekhyB2
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_000904_TTUQ1b1x1_1102499_aTsrYC4P/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits and wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits and wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits and wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits) and catalog (wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 6014 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 159.1319 to 175.0599 deg, Dec +0.5959 to +11.2736 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 159.1319 to 175.0599 deg, Dec 0.5959 to 11.2736 deg
Loaded 3946 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3223 out of 3349 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3349 out of 6014 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.794900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.794900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.59
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.20
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.20
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 6014 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 159.1319 to 175.0599 deg, Dec +0.5959 to +11.2736 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 159.1319 to 175.0599 deg, Dec 0.5959 to 11.2736 deg
Loaded 3946 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3223 out of 3349 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3349 out of 6014 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits (aperture=6.6)
Read 5979 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 159.0424 to 175.4602 deg, Dec +0.1921 to +11.6322 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 159.0424 to 175.4602 deg, Dec 0.1921 to 11.6322 deg
Loaded 4379 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3233 out of 3365 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3365 out of 5979 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits (aperture=6.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 3 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.5 pix Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
2.2 pix Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
2.2 pix fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-07-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
2.2 pix fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
2.5 pix wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
15.3 mag. Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
15.1 mag. fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-07-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
15.1 mag. fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.1 (SNR ) 12.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.G3uwThcWeP (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_000904_TTUQ1b1x1_1102499_aTsrYC4P/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=380, passed=6014
Got 6014 stars (including 5628 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6014 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 452 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 933 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5931 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 452 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5929 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5929 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 943 stars left (next iteration limit 1037)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits N_match=943 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.476 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.426 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.512 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.447 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.539 n_q1=237 n_q2=269 n_q3=220 n_q4=217 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.132
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits -region wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.cp8F6w4ldz (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_000904_TTUQ1b1x1_1102499_aTsrYC4P/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=392, passed=5979
Got 5979 stars (including 5577 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5979 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 450 to 510 (Dec 0.2 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 933 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5897 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 450 to 510 (Dec 0.2 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5896 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5896 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 943 stars left (next iteration limit 1037)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits N_match=943 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.381 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.337 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.405 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.354 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.368 n_q1=235 n_q2=251 n_q3=238 n_q4=219 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.063
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits -region wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.6BiEhIqY3G (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_000904_TTUQ1b1x1_1102499_aTsrYC4P/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_000904_TTUQ1b1x1_1102499_aTsrYC4P/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-07-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_000904_TTUQ1b1x1_1102499_aTsrYC4P/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-07-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_000904_TTUQ1b1x1_1102499_aTsrYC4P/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-07-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_000904_TTUQ1b1x1_1102499_aTsrYC4P/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-07-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_000904_TTUQ1b1x1_1102499_aTsrYC4P/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-07-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_000904_TTUQ1b1x1_1102499_aTsrYC4P/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-07-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-07-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-07-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-07-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-07-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-07-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-07-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-07-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_000904_TTUQ1b1x1_1102499_aTsrYC4P/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-07-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-07-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=372, passed=5272
Got 5272 stars (including 4891 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-07-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5272 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 934 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5203 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5203 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5203 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 940 stars left (next iteration limit 1034)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-07-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits N_match=940 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.420 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.426 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.412 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.417 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.392 n_q1=237 n_q2=245 n_q3=240 n_q4=218 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.014
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-07-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-07-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_000904_TTUQ1b1x1_1102499_aTsrYC4P/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-07-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-07-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-07-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.WNxoekhyB2 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_000904_TTUQ1b1x1_1102499_aTsrYC4P/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_000904_TTUQ1b1x1_1102499_aTsrYC4P/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_000904_TTUQ1b1x1_1102499_aTsrYC4P/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_000904_TTUQ1b1x1_1102499_aTsrYC4P/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_000904_TTUQ1b1x1_1102499_aTsrYC4P/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_000904_TTUQ1b1x1_1102499_aTsrYC4P/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_000904_TTUQ1b1x1_1102499_aTsrYC4P/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_000904_TTUQ1b1x1_1102499_aTsrYC4P/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=388, passed=5264
Got 5264 stars (including 4870 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5264 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 933 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5183 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5182 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5182 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 941 stars left (next iteration limit 1035)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits N_match=941 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.395 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.417 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.408 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.391 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.360 n_q1=237 n_q2=246 n_q3=238 n_q4=220 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.054
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_000904_TTUQ1b1x1_1102499_aTsrYC4P/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-07-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-07-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_000904_TTUQ1b1x1_1102499_aTsrYC4P/wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-07-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_000904_TTUQ1b1x1_1102499_aTsrYC4P/wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Leo-07-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 11:02:12.84 +05:11:49.6: 15.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 11:37:52.54 +02:10:33.1: 15.39 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 11:02:12.84 +05:11:49.6: 15.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 11:37:52.54 +02:10:33.1: 15.46 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20616.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20626.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 6s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20616_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
Preparing report for the candidate 20616_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20626_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
Preparing report for the candidate 20626_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03293_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 03293_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:10:50.79 +05:27:34.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 7s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Leo-07-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
11:37:52.54 +02:10:33.1
11:02:12.84 +05:11:49.6
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_000904_TTUQ1b1x1_1102499_aTsrYC4P/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-07-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_000904_TTUQ1b1x1_1102499_aTsrYC4P/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_000904_TTUQ1b1x1_1102499_aTsrYC4P/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-07-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_000904_TTUQ1b1x1_1102499_aTsrYC4P/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-07-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_000904_TTUQ1b1x1_1102499_aTsrYC4P/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_000904_TTUQ1b1x1_1102499_aTsrYC4P/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_000904_TTUQ1b1x1_1102499_aTsrYC4P/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-07-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_000904_TTUQ1b1x1_1102499_aTsrYC4P/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-07-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_000904_TTUQ1b1x1_1102499_aTsrYC4P/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-07-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_000904_TTUQ1b1x1_1102499_aTsrYC4P/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_000904_TTUQ1b1x1_1102499_aTsrYC4P/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-07-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_000904_TTUQ1b1x1_1102499_aTsrYC4P/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_000904_TTUQ1b1x1_1102499_aTsrYC4P/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-07-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-07-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_000904_TTUQ1b1x1_1102499_aTsrYC4P/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-07-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_000904_TTUQ1b1x1_1102499_aTsrYC4P/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_000904_TTUQ1b1x1_1102499_aTsrYC4P/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
util/wcs_image_calibration.sh: line 129: echo: write error: Broken pipe
The guess is 605 arcmin.
The guess is 605 arcmin.
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits was not found.
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-07-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-07-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-07-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-07-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-07-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits was not found.
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_000904_TTUQ1b1x1_1102499_aTsrYC4P/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_000904_TTUQ1b1x1_1102499_aTsrYC4P/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-07-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-07-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
The guess is 570 arcmin.
The guess is 573 arcmin.
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits was not found.
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
verification OK: wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
verification OK: wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
Generating wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits.cat from image00004.cat
Generating wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-07-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.cat from image00003.cat
Generating wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat from image00002.cat
Generating wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat from image00001.cat
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-07-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-07-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-07-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
Catalog wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits created.
Catalog wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
verification OK: wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-07-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
verification OK: wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
verification OK: wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:08:26.588 +06:02:38.54 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
Image size: 941.4'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:08:27.588 +06:02:44.82 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
Image size: 937.3'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:08:37.871 +05:58:55.04 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
Image size: 941.4'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:08:39.011 +05:58:19.41 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 30845 stars ###
### Converted positions of 30656 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-07-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
### Converted positions of 32625 stars ###
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_000904_TTUQ1b1x1_1102499_aTsrYC4P/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky1154397.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
### Converted positions of 31020 stars ###
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_000904_TTUQ1b1x1_1102499_aTsrYC4P/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky1154394.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-07-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
'wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_000904_TTUQ1b1x1_1102499_aTsrYC4P/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky1154414.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_000904_TTUQ1b1x1_1102499_aTsrYC4P/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky1154416.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-07-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:08:37.871 +05:58:55.04 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-07-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-07-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:08:27.588 +06:02:44.82 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:08:37.871 +05:58:55.04
Second-epoch image center 11:08:27.588 +06:02:44.82
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0767 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:08:26.588 +06:02:38.54 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:08:37.871 +05:58:55.04
Second-epoch image center 11:08:26.588 +06:02:38.54
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0777 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
ref2=wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
new1=wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-07-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
new2=wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
reference average sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
INFO: WCS quality sigma_overall_arcsec not available for comparison (1st new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality sigma_overall_arcsec not available for comparison (2nd new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio not available for comparison (1st new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio not available for comparison (2nd new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 11:08:27.588 +06:02:44.82
Second-epoch second image center 11:08:26.588 +06:02:38.54
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00450 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits &> /tmp/tmp.d8R0P0OIXp
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits &> /tmp/tmp.vWOLrBLbmk
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_000904_TTUQ1b1x1_1102499_aTsrYC4P/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-07-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits &> /tmp/tmp.SYNrH4U0nv
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_000904_TTUQ1b1x1_1102499_aTsrYC4P/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-07-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_000904_TTUQ1b1x1_1102499_aTsrYC4P/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ELOZwCvreB
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_000904_TTUQ1b1x1_1102499_aTsrYC4P/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits and wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits and wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits and wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits) and catalog (wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 31020 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 159.1320 to 175.0637 deg, Dec +0.5959 to +11.2851 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 159.1320 to 175.0637 deg, Dec 0.5959 to 11.2851 deg
Loaded 3949 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3105 out of 3398 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3398 out of 31020 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.669100
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.669100
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.32
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.35
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.35
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 31020 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 159.1320 to 175.0637 deg, Dec +0.5959 to +11.2851 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 159.1320 to 175.0637 deg, Dec 0.5959 to 11.2851 deg
Loaded 3949 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3105 out of 3398 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3398 out of 31020 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits (aperture=5.1)
Read 32625 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 158.9765 to 175.4716 deg, Dec +0.1922 to +11.6821 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 158.9765 to 175.4716 deg, Dec 0.1922 to 11.6821 deg
Loaded 4428 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3126 out of 3432 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3432 out of 32625 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits (aperture=5.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 257 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
2.1 pix Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
2.0 pix fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-07-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
2.0 pix fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
15.4 mag. Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
15.2 mag. fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-07-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
15.3 mag. fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.2 (SNR ) 14.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.d8R0P0OIXp (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_000904_TTUQ1b1x1_1102499_aTsrYC4P/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=18, blended=1265, passed=31002
Got 31002 stars (including 29705 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 31002 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 452 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 935 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30704 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 452 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30706 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30706 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 945 stars left (next iteration limit 1040)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits N_match=945 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.452 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.346 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.470 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.455 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.519 n_q1=226 n_q2=276 n_q3=221 n_q4=222 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.150
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits -region wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.vWOLrBLbmk (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_000904_TTUQ1b1x1_1102499_aTsrYC4P/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=12, blended=1301, passed=32613
Got 32613 stars (including 31248 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 32613 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 450 to 510 (Dec 0.2 to 11.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 937 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32299 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 450 to 510 (Dec 0.2 to 11.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32298 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32298 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 947 stars left (next iteration limit 1041)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits N_match=947 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.297 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.274 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.328 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.272 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.295 n_q1=239 n_q2=251 n_q3=241 n_q4=216 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.102
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits -region wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.SYNrH4U0nv (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_000904_TTUQ1b1x1_1102499_aTsrYC4P/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_000904_TTUQ1b1x1_1102499_aTsrYC4P/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-07-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_000904_TTUQ1b1x1_1102499_aTsrYC4P/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-07-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_000904_TTUQ1b1x1_1102499_aTsrYC4P/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-07-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_000904_TTUQ1b1x1_1102499_aTsrYC4P/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-07-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_000904_TTUQ1b1x1_1102499_aTsrYC4P/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-07-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_000904_TTUQ1b1x1_1102499_aTsrYC4P/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-07-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-07-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-07-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-07-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-07-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-07-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-07-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-07-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_000904_TTUQ1b1x1_1102499_aTsrYC4P/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-07-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-07-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=19, blended=1119, passed=30637
Got 30637 stars (including 29462 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-07-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 30637 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 935 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30282 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30283 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30283 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 943 stars left (next iteration limit 1037)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-07-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits N_match=943 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.374 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.351 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.386 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.340 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.352 n_q1=244 n_q2=245 n_q3=235 n_q4=219 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.031
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-07-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-07-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_000904_TTUQ1b1x1_1102499_aTsrYC4P/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-07-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-07-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-07-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ELOZwCvreB (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_000904_TTUQ1b1x1_1102499_aTsrYC4P/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_000904_TTUQ1b1x1_1102499_aTsrYC4P/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_000904_TTUQ1b1x1_1102499_aTsrYC4P/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_000904_TTUQ1b1x1_1102499_aTsrYC4P/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_000904_TTUQ1b1x1_1102499_aTsrYC4P/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_000904_TTUQ1b1x1_1102499_aTsrYC4P/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_000904_TTUQ1b1x1_1102499_aTsrYC4P/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_000904_TTUQ1b1x1_1102499_aTsrYC4P/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=1193, passed=30834
Got 30834 stars (including 29579 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 30834 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 936 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30427 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30425 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30425 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 944 stars left (next iteration limit 1038)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits N_match=944 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.378 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.394 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.411 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.392 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.313 n_q1=242 n_q2=250 n_q3=232 n_q4=220 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.088
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_000904_TTUQ1b1x1_1102499_aTsrYC4P/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-07-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_000904_TTUQ1b1x1_1102499_aTsrYC4P/wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-07-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_000904_TTUQ1b1x1_1102499_aTsrYC4P/wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Leo-07-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 11:02:56.75 +08:31:12.4: 14.25 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 10:54:14.94 +01:15:17.0: 12.90 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 11:21:51.90 +09:21:16.4: 14.94 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 11:23:25.05 +06:19:17.8: 15.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 11:02:56.75 +08:31:12.4: 14.40 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.32 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:02:56.75 +08:31:12.4: ref_mag=14.32 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.7033 delta=-0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 10:54:14.94 +01:15:17.0: 12.99 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.95 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:54:14.94 +01:15:17.0: ref_mag=12.95 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1577 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 11:21:51.90 +09:21:16.4: 14.63 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.73 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:21:51.90 +09:21:16.4: ref_mag=14.73 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.9474 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 11:23:25.05 +06:19:17.8: 15.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 11:08:27.83 +01:36:36.5: 15.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 10:50:03.08 +04:18:39.2: 15.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 11:08:27.83 +01:36:36.5: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 10:50:03.08 +04:18:39.2: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 10:40:39.76 +07:29:33.8: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 10:40:39.76 +07:29:33.8: 15.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 11:04:58.22 +07:22:13.6: 13.36 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 11:15:25.36 +04:16:27.5: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 11:04:58.22 +07:22:13.6: 13.47 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.41 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:04:58.22 +07:22:13.6: ref_mag=13.41 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4736 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 11:36:00.35 +04:02:25.5: 15.75 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 11:15:25.36 +04:16:27.5: 16.06 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 11:36:00.35 +04:02:25.5: 15.78 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 11:02:41.64 +03:59:02.7: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 11:02:41.64 +03:59:02.7: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 10:58:28.46 +10:34:45.8: 15.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 10:58:28.46 +10:34:45.8: 15.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 10:40:21.79 +07:25:06.9: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 11:01:06.44 +08:56:50.9: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 10:40:21.79 +07:25:06.9: 15.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 11:01:06.44 +08:56:50.9: 16.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 11:24:24.78 +09:29:18.6: 14.28 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 11:21:31.54 +08:48:19.5: 13.94 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 11:24:24.78 +09:29:18.6: 14.51 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 11:21:31.54 +08:48:19.5: 14.16 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.38 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:24:24.78 +09:29:18.6: ref_mag=14.38 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.5312 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.03 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:21:31.54 +08:48:19.5: ref_mag=14.03 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.4683 delta=-0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 11:39:37.54 +08:20:16.3: 14.93 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 11:35:40.59 +06:38:18.4: 14.91 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 11:39:37.54 +08:20:16.3: 15.02 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.98 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:39:37.54 +08:20:16.3: ref_mag=14.98 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.7482 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 11:32:48.66 +05:30:24.3: 14.79 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 11:35:40.59 +06:38:18.4: 14.93 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.92 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:35:40.59 +06:38:18.4: ref_mag=14.92 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.7499 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 10:38:29.42 +02:31:36.1: 14.76 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 11:32:48.66 +05:30:24.3: 14.75 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.77 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:32:48.66 +05:30:24.3: ref_mag=14.77 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.6615 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 11:39:03.83 +06:30:26.4: 14.96 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 11:31:54.91 +05:52:46.4: 15.33 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 10:40:11.87 +10:20:41.8: 15.02 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 10:38:29.42 +02:31:36.1: 14.94 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.84 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:38:29.42 +02:31:36.1: ref_mag=14.84 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.4572 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 11:38:44.48 +09:41:12.3: 14.85 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 10:38:04.38 +03:33:54.0: 14.93 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 11:34:28.74 +03:46:28.7: 15.29 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 11:35:50.88 +06:48:11.7: 15.17 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 11:39:03.83 +06:30:26.4: 14.90 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.93 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:39:03.83 +06:30:26.4: ref_mag=14.93 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.9111 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 11:31:54.91 +05:52:46.4: 14.99 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.10 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:31:54.91 +05:52:46.4: ref_mag=15.10 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.7733 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 10:40:11.87 +10:20:41.8: 14.73 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.84 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:40:11.87 +10:20:41.8: ref_mag=14.84 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.5530 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 11:38:44.48 +09:41:12.3: 15.22 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.99 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:38:44.48 +09:41:12.3: ref_mag=14.99 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.9127 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 10:38:04.38 +03:33:54.0: 15.15 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.02 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:38:04.38 +03:33:54.0: ref_mag=15.02 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.5491 delta=0.47 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 11:34:28.74 +03:46:28.7: 15.01 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.11 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:34:28.74 +03:46:28.7: ref_mag=15.11 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.8133 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 11:34:07.20 +09:42:13.9: 15.39 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 11:35:50.88 +06:48:11.7: 14.96 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.04 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:35:50.88 +06:48:11.7: ref_mag=15.04 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.7869 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 11:34:20.93 +03:01:06.8: 15.43 +/- 0.34 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 11:34:07.20 +09:42:13.9: 15.53 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.46 +/- 0.19
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:34:07.20 +09:42:13.9: ref_mag=15.46 +/- 0.19 new_mean_mag=14.8943 delta=0.56 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 11:25:42.55 +03:30:02.4: 15.08 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 11:20:40.30 +01:51:22.1: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 11:34:20.93 +03:01:06.8: 14.97 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.11 +/- 0.18
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:34:20.93 +03:01:06.8: ref_mag=15.11 +/- 0.18 new_mean_mag=14.8331 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 11:27:42.79 +01:45:41.1: 15.08 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 11:25:42.55 +03:30:02.4: 15.05 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.07 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:25:42.55 +03:30:02.4: ref_mag=15.07 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.8471 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 11:20:40.30 +01:51:22.1: 15.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 10:46:39.41 +07:18:49.5: 15.45 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 11:09:33.61 +03:09:27.1: 15.10 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 10:38:33.14 +03:06:53.2: 14.85 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 11:27:42.79 +01:45:41.1: 14.90 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.97 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:27:42.79 +01:45:41.1: ref_mag=14.97 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.9244 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 10:44:14.14 +02:16:41.0: 15.18 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 10:46:39.41 +07:18:49.5: 15.40 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 11:09:33.61 +03:09:27.1: 15.21 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.16 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.42 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:09:33.61 +03:09:27.1: ref_mag=15.16 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.9239 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:46:39.41 +07:18:49.5: ref_mag=15.42 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.8319 delta=0.59 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 10:45:50.65 +05:29:28.8: 14.97 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 10:38:33.14 +03:06:53.2: 15.02 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.92 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:38:33.14 +03:06:53.2: ref_mag=14.92 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.7186 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 10:41:58.30 +01:51:17.5: 15.13 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 10:44:14.14 +02:16:41.0: 15.40 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.28 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:44:14.14 +02:16:41.0: ref_mag=15.28 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=14.8531 delta=0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 10:45:50.65 +05:29:28.8: 15.08 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.02 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:45:50.65 +05:29:28.8: ref_mag=15.02 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.8479 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 10:41:58.30 +01:51:17.5: 15.29 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.20 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:41:58.30 +01:51:17.5: ref_mag=15.20 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.8847 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54513.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54549.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54564.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54586.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54613.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54623.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54637.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54684.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54709.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54710.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54902.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 15s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 8s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54485_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54485_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54486_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54486_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54489_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54489_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:43:04.38 +10:31:05.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54491_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54491_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:18:30.15 +10:50:09.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54494_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54494_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:38:52.69 +07:54:39.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54496_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54496_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54499_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54499_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:37:52.52 +02:10:33.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54503_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54503_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54511_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54511_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54512_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54512_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:02:12.82 +05:11:49.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54513_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
Preparing report for the candidate 54513_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54514_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54514_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54515_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54515_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54516_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54516_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54518_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54518_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54520_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54520_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54522_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54522_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54523_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54523_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54524_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54524_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54526_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54526_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54527_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54527_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54528_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54528_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54529_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54529_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54530_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54530_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54531_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54531_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54534_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54534_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54535_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54535_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54540_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54540_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54543_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54543_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54544_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54544_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54547_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54547_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54549_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
Preparing report for the candidate 54549_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54550_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54550_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54551_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54551_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54553_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54553_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54554_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54554_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54557_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54557_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54558_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54558_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54559_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54559_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54562_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54562_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54563_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54563_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54564_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
Preparing report for the candidate 54564_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54565_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54565_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54566_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54566_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54567_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54567_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54568_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54568_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:18:56.46 +10:11:22.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54569_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54569_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54570_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54570_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54571_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54571_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54572_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54572_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54573_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54573_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54575_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54575_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54576_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54576_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54577_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54577_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54578_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54578_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54579_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54579_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54580_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54580_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54581_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54581_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54582_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54582_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54584_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54584_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54585_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54585_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54586_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
Preparing report for the candidate 54586_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54587_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54587_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54589_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54589_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54590_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54590_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54591_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54591_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54594_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54594_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54596_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54596_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54597_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54597_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54598_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54598_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54599_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54599_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54600_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54600_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54602_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54602_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54604_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54604_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54605_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54605_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54606_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54606_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54607_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54607_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54609_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54609_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54610_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54610_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54612_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54612_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54613_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
Preparing report for the candidate 54613_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54614_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54614_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54616_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54616_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54617_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54617_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54618_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54618_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54619_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54619_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54621_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54621_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54623_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
Preparing report for the candidate 54623_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54624_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54624_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54626_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54626_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54628_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54628_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54629_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54629_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54630_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54630_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54631_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54631_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:37:07.97 +03:02:06.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54634_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54634_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54635_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54635_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54636_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54636_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54637_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
Preparing report for the candidate 54637_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54638_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54638_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54640_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54640_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54641_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54641_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54643_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54643_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54646_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54646_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54648_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54648_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54649_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54649_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54654_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54654_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54656_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54656_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54658_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54658_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54660_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54660_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54661_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54661_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54662_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54662_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54663_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54663_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54664_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54664_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54665_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54665_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54669_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54669_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54671_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54671_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54672_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54672_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54673_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54673_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54676_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54676_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54679_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54679_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54680_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54680_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54681_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54681_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54682_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54682_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54683_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54683_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54684_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
Preparing report for the candidate 54684_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54690_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54690_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54691_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54691_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54692_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54692_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54694_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54694_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54698_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54698_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54701_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54701_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54702_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54702_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54703_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54703_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54706_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54706_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54709_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
Preparing report for the candidate 54709_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54710_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
Preparing report for the candidate 54710_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54713_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54713_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54714_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54714_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54715_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54715_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54718_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54718_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54720_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54720_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54721_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54721_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54723_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54723_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54725_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54725_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54726_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54726_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54727_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54727_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54728_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54728_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54729_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54729_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54730_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54730_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54731_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54731_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54732_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54732_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54733_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54733_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54736_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54736_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54739_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54739_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54740_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54740_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54741_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54741_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54742_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54742_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54744_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54744_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54745_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54745_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54747_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54747_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54748_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54748_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54749_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54749_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54752_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54752_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54753_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54753_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54754_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54754_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54756_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54756_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54757_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54757_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54759_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54759_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54760_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54760_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54763_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54763_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54764_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54764_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54768_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54768_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54770_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54770_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54776_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54776_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54777_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54777_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54778_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54778_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54779_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54779_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54781_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54781_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54783_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54783_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54788_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54788_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54790_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54790_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54792_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54792_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54796_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54796_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54799_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54799_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54802_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54802_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54805_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54805_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54806_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54806_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54807_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54807_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54808_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54808_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54809_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54809_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54810_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54810_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54814_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54814_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54818_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54818_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54819_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54819_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54825_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54825_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54828_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54828_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54829_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54829_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54831_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54831_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54832_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54832_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54837_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54837_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54839_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54839_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54842_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54842_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54843_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54843_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54845_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54845_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54846_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54846_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54850_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54850_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54851_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54851_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54852_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54852_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54853_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54853_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54854_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54854_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54855_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54855_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54856_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54856_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54857_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54857_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54858_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54858_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54861_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54861_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54864_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54864_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54866_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54866_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54868_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54868_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54875_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54875_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54876_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54876_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54879_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54879_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54882_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54882_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54883_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54883_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54886_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54886_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54887_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54887_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54891_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54891_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54892_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54892_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54894_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54894_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54902_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
Preparing report for the candidate 54902_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54904_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54904_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54908_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54908_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54912_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54912_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54915_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54915_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54916_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54916_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54923_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54923_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54934_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54934_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54943_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54943_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54948_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54948_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54958_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54958_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54967_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54967_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54979_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54979_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54982_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54982_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54994_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54994_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54996_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 54996_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55009_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 55009_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55023_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 55023_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55028_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 55028_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55032_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 55032_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55039_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 55039_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55051_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 55051_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55055_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 55055_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55064_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 55064_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55080_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 55080_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55128_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 55128_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53043_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 53043_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05030_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 05030_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:57:56.30 +09:23:15.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 16796_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 16796_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-08-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
