This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_000704_TTUQ1b1x1_1052467_LsAtt6fm
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 11.2123 2461171.7123 13.71 11:36:34.81 -08:14:40.3
273.15802 50.24939 galactic Crt Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 3.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.227 Philosophia -0 1 1 13.5 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 11:36:34.81 -08:14:40.3: 15.73 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 11:36:34.81 -08:14:40.3: 15.77 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461171.7123,13.71,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260511.2123 13.71CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 11.2123 2461171.7123 13.70 11:30:44.57 -08:40:39.1
271.48017 49.20306 galactic Crt Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 3.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.639 Latona -0 1 1 13.9 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 11:30:44.57 -08:40:39.1: 15.65 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 11:30:44.57 -08:40:39.1: 15.68 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461171.7123,13.70,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260511.2123 13.70CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 11.2123 2461171.7123 13.97 12:25:29.12 -09:16:23.7
292.23811 53.05879 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.7" and 3.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.509 Iolanda 0 1 1 13.7 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 12:25:29.12 -09:16:23.7: 15.59 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 12:25:29.12 -09:16:23.7: 15.61 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 11.2123* 12 25 29.12 -09 16 23.7 14.0 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461171.7123,13.97,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260511.2123 13.97CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 11.2123 2461171.7123 13.89 12:17:24.88 -11:59:08.3
289.91701 50.02437 galactic Crv Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 3.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.36 Atalante 1 1 1 14.1 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 12:17:24.88 -11:59:08.3: 15.70 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 12:17:24.88 -11:59:08.3: 15.69 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461171.7123,13.89,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260511.2123 13.89CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 11.2123 2461171.7123 14.25 11:38:34.09 -05:01:31.6
271.49358 53.33937 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 3.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.193 Ambrosia 0 1 1 14.5 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 11:38:34.09 -05:01:31.6: 15.71 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 11:38:34.09 -05:01:31.6: 15.71 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 11.2123* 11 38 34.09 -05 01 31.6 14.2 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461171.7123,14.25,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260511.2123 14.25CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461147.76570362 17.04.2026 06:22:26.793 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
First image: 2461147.76570362 17.04.2026 06:22:26.793 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
Last image: 2461171.71265382 11.05.2026 05:06:03.290 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_000704_TTUQ1b1x1_1052467_LsAtt6fm/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 3
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.68
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 5466
Objects passed selection criteria: 5466
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.8 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.8 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 5295.25
Average stars matched: 5154.75 (97.3467 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 111396 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun May 10 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-44-gd532a530
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-10)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon May 11 00:08:06 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461147.76570362 17.04.2026 06:22:26.793 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
First image: 2461147.76570362 17.04.2026 06:22:26.793 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
Last image: 2461171.71265382 11.05.2026 05:06:03.290 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_000704_TTUQ1b1x1_1052467_LsAtt6fm/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 97
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.41
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 10 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 34403
Objects passed selection criteria: 34311
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.8 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 33352
Average stars matched: 31980.8 (95.8886 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 135352 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun May 10 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-44-gd532a530
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-10)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon May 11 00:09:22 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_000704_TTUQ1b1x1_1052467_LsAtt6fm/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_000704_TTUQ1b1x1_1052467_LsAtt6fm/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_000704_TTUQ1b1x1_1052467_LsAtt6fm/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_000704_TTUQ1b1x1_1052467_LsAtt6fm/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461171.71199968
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_000704_TTUQ1b1x1_1052467_LsAtt6fm/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_000704_TTUQ1b1x1_1052467_LsAtt6fm/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_000704_TTUQ1b1x1_1052467_LsAtt6fm/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_000704_TTUQ1b1x1_1052467_LsAtt6fm/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_000704_TTUQ1b1x1_1052467_LsAtt6fm/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_000704_TTUQ1b1x1_1052467_LsAtt6fm/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_000704_TTUQ1b1x1_1052467_LsAtt6fm/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_000704_TTUQ1b1x1_1052467_LsAtt6fm/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_000704_TTUQ1b1x1_1052467_LsAtt6fm/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_000704_TTUQ1b1x1_1052467_LsAtt6fm/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
The guess is 605 arcmin.
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_000704_TTUQ1b1x1_1052467_LsAtt6fm/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_000704_TTUQ1b1x1_1052467_LsAtt6fm/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
The guess is 605 arcmin.
No image with WCS calibration found for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_000704_TTUQ1b1x1_1052467_LsAtt6fm/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits .... Determining astrometry method...
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net software...
Choosing aperture...
Using the catalog image00003.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_000704_TTUQ1b1x1_1052467_LsAtt6fm/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
No image with WCS calibration found for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_000704_TTUQ1b1x1_1052467_LsAtt6fm/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits .... Determining astrometry method...
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net software...
Choosing aperture...
Using the catalog image00004.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_000704_TTUQ1b1x1_1052467_LsAtt6fm/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_000704_TTUQ1b1x1_1052467_LsAtt6fm/lib/make_outxyls_for_astrometric_calibration found 5198 high-SNR stars for plate solving
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
The guess is 573 arcmin.
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits was not found.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_000704_TTUQ1b1x1_1052467_LsAtt6fm/lib/make_outxyls_for_astrometric_calibration found 5176 high-SNR stars for plate solving
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits'
This service uses tools provided by Astrometry.net.
For more information visit http://astrometry.net/
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
The guess is 571 arcmin.
verification OK: wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
This service uses tools provided by Astrometry.net.
For more information visit http://astrometry.net/
######### Trying to solve plate assuming 605' field of view #########
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_000704_TTUQ1b1x1_1052467_LsAtt6fm/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net code
######### Trying to solve plate assuming 605' field of view #########
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_000704_TTUQ1b1x1_1052467_LsAtt6fm/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net code
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
IMAGE_SIZE= --width 9576 --height 6388 SCALE_LOW=544.5 SCALE_HIGH=3025.0
Using solve-field binary
/usr/local/astrometry/bin/solve-field
IMAGE_SIZE= --width 9576 --height 6388 SCALE_LOW=544.5 SCALE_HIGH=3025.0
Using solve-field binary
/usr/local/astrometry/bin/solve-field
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out1084350.xyls"...
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out1084353.xyls"...
verification OK: wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
Generating wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits.cat from image00001.cat
Catalog wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
Generating wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits.cat from image00002.cat
Catalog wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
verification OK: wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
verification OK: wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:00:03.184 -10:00:19.72 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
Image size: 941.3'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:00:03.449 -09:59:35.68 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 5414 stars ###
'wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_000704_TTUQ1b1x1_1052467_LsAtt6fm/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky1084807.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
### Converted positions of 5369 stars ###
'wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_000704_TTUQ1b1x1_1052467_LsAtt6fm/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky1084818.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading file "./out1084353.axy"...
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4119.fits, field objects 1-10).
Reading file "./out1084350.axy"...
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4118.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4119.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4118.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4117.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4117.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4116.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4116.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4115.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4115.fits, field objects 1-10).
log-odds ratio 115.815 (1.98595e+50), 29 match, 0 conflict, 104 distractors, 94 index.
RA,Dec = (179.928,-9.95639), pixel scale 5.9517 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: --++---+---+---+---+---+--++---+---+---+---+---+--++---+---+---+---+-------+---+-------+---+---+----
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4114.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1: solved with index index-4114.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out1084353.solved to indicate this.
Field: out1084353.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (179.946638, -9.953418) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (11:59:47.193, -09:57:12.306).
Field size: 15.7187 x 10.5834 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -176.439 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Inserting WCS header... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_000704_TTUQ1b1x1_1052467_LsAtt6fm/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits' -> 'fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits'
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4113.fits, field objects 1-10).
log-odds ratio 346.992 (4.97408e+150), 135 match, 2 conflict, 297 distractors, 371 index.
RA,Dec = (179.987,-9.9645), pixel scale 5.94126 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++------+++------++++----+++-----++-----++------++++----++++-----+++-----+++----++------+++-----++++
WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M May 11 00:08 fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K May 11 00:08 out1084353.wcs
Inserting WCS header (1st iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits)... done!
Field 1: solved with index index-4112.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out1084350.solved to indicate this.
Field: out1084350.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (179.953052, -9.950393) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (11:59:48.732, -09:57:01.413).
Field size: 15.7954 x 10.5787 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -176.394 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Inserting WCS header... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_000704_TTUQ1b1x1_1052467_LsAtt6fm/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits' -> 'fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits'
WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M May 11 00:08 fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K May 11 00:08 out1084350.wcs
Inserting WCS header (1st iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits)... done!
done!
done!
All done!
done
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_000704_TTUQ1b1x1_1052467_LsAtt6fm/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits (fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits)
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration01' / astrometry.net run
All done!
done
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_000704_TTUQ1b1x1_1052467_LsAtt6fm/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits (fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits)
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration01' / astrometry.net run
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out1084353.xyls"...
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out1084350.xyls"...
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading file "./out1084350.axy"...
Only searching for solutions within 15.73 degrees of RA,Dec (179.952,-9.95117)
log-odds ratio 97.7614 (2.86586e+42), 14 match, 0 conflict, 24 distractors, 22 index.
RA,Dec = (179.962,-9.94616), pixel scale 5.9765 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++-+++---+-++---+++-----+-----------++(best)--------------------------------------------------------------
Reading file "./out1084353.axy"...
Only searching for solutions within 15.6017 degrees of RA,Dec (179.946,-9.95419)
log-odds ratio 97.325 (1.85223e+42), 14 match, 0 conflict, 26 distractors, 22 index.
RA,Dec = (179.967,-9.94912), pixel scale 5.97655 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++-+---+-++--+--+-+-+---------------++(best)------------------------------------------------------------
Field 1: solved with index index-4116.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out1084350.solved to indicate this.
Field 1: solved with index index-4116.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out1084353.solved to indicate this.
Field: out1084350.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (179.954721, -9.949095) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (11:59:49.133, -09:56:56.742).
Field size: 15.7767 x 10.5772 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -176.418 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Field: out1084353.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (179.959953, -9.952055) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (11:59:50.389, -09:57:07.397).
Field size: 15.7767 x 10.5773 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -176.418 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M May 11 00:08 fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K May 11 00:08 out1084350.wcs
Inserting WCS header (2nd iteration local)... -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M May 11 00:08 fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K May 11 00:08 out1084353.wcs
Inserting WCS header (2nd iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits)... Opening FITS image file fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits)... done!
done!
done!
done!
All done!
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors.
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration02' / astrometry.net run
The field of view is large: we'll try to run Astromety.net code on the image itself rather than a star list
Reading input file "wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits"...
Found an existing WCS header, will try to verify it.
Extracting sources...
All done!
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors.
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration02' / astrometry.net run
The field of view is large: we'll try to run Astromety.net code on the image itself rather than a star list
Reading input file "wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits"...
Found an existing WCS header, will try to verify it.
Extracting sources...
simplexy: found 25857 sources.
simplexy: found 25851 sources.
Solving...
Solving...
Reading file "./wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.axy"...
Verifying WCS using indices with quads of size [63.7362, 955.444] arcmin
Reading file "./wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.axy"...
Verifying WCS using indices with quads of size [63.7358, 955.439] arcmin
Verifying WCS with index 39 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4117.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 0
Verifying WCS with index 40 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4116.fits)
Verifying WCS with index 39 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4117.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 99.8044 (2.21048e+43), 22 match, 0 conflict, 476 distractors, 22 index.
RA,Dec = (179.961,-9.95128), pixel scale 5.98649 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ----------------+----+----++--------------+--------------------------+-+---+-------+----------+----+
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 0
Verifying WCS with index 40 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4116.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 77.2495 (3.54011e+33), 22 match, 0 conflict, 492 distractors, 22 index.
RA,Dec = (179.956,-9.94832), pixel scale 5.98646 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ------------+-----------++---------------------------------+---------------+-++--------+-----------+
--> log-odds 99.8044
Verifying WCS with index 41 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4115.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 328.519 (4.72028e+142), 44 match, 0 conflict, 454 distractors, 44 index.
RA,Dec = (179.961,-9.95128), pixel scale 5.98649 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ----------------+----+----++---+---------++--+---------------------+-+-+--++-------+----------+----+
--> log-odds 77.2495
Verifying WCS with index 41 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4115.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 327.131 (1.17817e+142), 44 match, 0 conflict, 470 distractors, 44 index.
RA,Dec = (179.956,-9.94832), pixel scale 5.98646 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ------------+-----------+++----+----+----------------+-----+---------------+-++--+-----+-----------+
--> log-odds 328.519
Verifying WCS with index 42 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4114.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 834.786 (inf), 94 match, 0 conflict, 404 distractors, 94 index.
RA,Dec = (179.961,-9.95128), pixel scale 5.98649 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -------------++-+++--+-+--++---+-------+-++--+++--+----++--+-----+++-+-+--++-+++---+---+---+--+----+
--> log-odds 327.131
Verifying WCS with index 42 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4114.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 827.78 (inf), 94 match, 0 conflict, 420 distractors, 94 index.
RA,Dec = (179.956,-9.94832), pixel scale 5.98646 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ---+--------+-+-+------+++++--++----+--+---------+---+-+---+---+-+----+----+-++--+-----+++-+-+-+---+
--> log-odds 834.786
Verifying WCS with index 43 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4113.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 1750.18 (inf), 188 match, 0 conflict, 405 distractors, 191 index.
RA,Dec = (179.961,-9.95128), pixel scale 5.98649 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -+++++++--+-+++++++-+++---++-+-+-+++-+++-++-+++++++-----+--+--++-++++++++-++-+++++-+-++++-+++-+-+--+
--> log-odds 827.78
Verifying WCS with index 43 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4113.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 1754.46 (inf), 188 match, 0 conflict, 405 distractors, 191 index.
RA,Dec = (179.956,-9.94832), pixel scale 5.98646 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: --++++-+-++-+++++-++-++-++++++++--+++++++---+-++++++++++++-+--+-++++--+++--+-++-++-++--+++++++++-+-+
--> log-odds 1750.18
Verifying WCS with index 44 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4112.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 3366.69 (inf), 378 match, 0 conflict, 410 distractors, 382 index.
RA,Dec = (179.961,-9.95128), pixel scale 5.98649 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++++++++++++++++++++++++-++++++-++++++++++++++++++++-++++++++++++++++++++++-+++++++-++++-+++-+++--+
--> log-odds 1754.46
Verifying WCS with index 44 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4112.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 3373.57 (inf), 378 match, 0 conflict, 306 distractors, 382 index.
RA,Dec = (179.956,-9.94832), pixel scale 5.98646 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +-++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-++++++++--++++++++++++++++++-+++++++++++++++++++++++--+++++++++-+++
--> log-odds 3366.69
Verifying WCS with index 45 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4111.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 6027.3 (inf), 727 match, 0 conflict, 863 distractors, 738 index.
RA,Dec = (179.961,-9.95128), pixel scale 5.98649 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-++
--> log-odds 3373.57
Verifying WCS with index 45 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4111.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 6033.11 (inf), 727 match, 0 conflict, 862 distractors, 738 index.
RA,Dec = (179.956,-9.94832), pixel scale 5.98646 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
--> log-odds 6027.3
Verifying WCS with index 46 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4110.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 10890.6 (inf), 1429 match, 0 conflict, 1897 distractors, 1457 index.
RA,Dec = (179.961,-9.95128), pixel scale 5.98649 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-++
--> log-odds 6033.11
Verifying WCS with index 46 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4110.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 10888.8 (inf), 1431 match, 0 conflict, 3319 distractors, 1458 index.
RA,Dec = (179.956,-9.94832), pixel scale 5.98646 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
--> log-odds 10890.6
Got 7 solutions.
Field: wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (179.959916, -9.953608) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (11:59:50.380, -09:57:12.989).
Field size: 15.7737 x 10.5781 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -176.395 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Creating new FITS file "./wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.new"...
--> log-odds 10888.8
Got 7 solutions.
Field: wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (179.954691, -9.950647) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (11:59:49.126, -09:57:02.330).
Field size: 15.7737 x 10.5782 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -176.395 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Creating new FITS file "./wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.new"...
renamed 'wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.new' -> 'wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits'
renamed 'wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.new' -> 'wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits'
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits was not found.
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_000704_TTUQ1b1x1_1052467_LsAtt6fm/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_000704_TTUQ1b1x1_1052467_LsAtt6fm/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
Generating wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits.cat from image00004.cat
Generating wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits.cat from image00003.cat
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits created.
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_000704_TTUQ1b1x1_1052467_LsAtt6fm/util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_000704_TTUQ1b1x1_1052467_LsAtt6fm/util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Image size: 941.4'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:59:48.911 -09:57:05.13 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
Image size: 941.4'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:59:50.165 -09:57:15.79 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 5305 stars ###
### Converted positions of 5282 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_000704_TTUQ1b1x1_1052467_LsAtt6fm/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky1086007.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_000704_TTUQ1b1x1_1052467_LsAtt6fm/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky1086004.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits'
wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits'
wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits'
wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:00:03.184 -10:00:19.72 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:59:48.911 -09:57:05.13 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 12:00:03.184 -10:00:19.72
Second-epoch image center 11:59:48.911 -09:57:05.13
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0797 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:59:50.165 -09:57:15.79 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 12:00:03.184 -10:00:19.72
Second-epoch image center 11:59:50.165 -09:57:15.79
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0739 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
ref2=wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
new1=wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
new2=wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
reference average sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
INFO: WCS quality sigma_overall_arcsec not available for comparison (1st new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality sigma_overall_arcsec not available for comparison (2nd new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio not available for comparison (1st new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio not available for comparison (2nd new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 11:59:48.911 -09:57:05.13
Second-epoch second image center 11:59:50.165 -09:57:15.79
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00594 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits &> /tmp/tmp.OyWfeO4uFR
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits &> /tmp/tmp.cM1VTjxQWE
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_000704_TTUQ1b1x1_1052467_LsAtt6fm/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Kf6JHhOcGV
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_000704_TTUQ1b1x1_1052467_LsAtt6fm/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_000704_TTUQ1b1x1_1052467_LsAtt6fm/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits &> /tmp/tmp.rHt1lBkr6n
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_000704_TTUQ1b1x1_1052467_LsAtt6fm/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits and wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits and wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits and wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits) and catalog (wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 5414 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 171.6120 to 188.1907 deg, Dec -15.6584 to -4.2135 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 171.6120 to 188.1907 deg, Dec -15.6584 to -4.2135 deg
Loaded 4776 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3415 out of 3518 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3518 out of 5414 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.685200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.685200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.68
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.01
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.01
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 5414 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 171.6120 to 188.1907 deg, Dec -15.6584 to -4.2135 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 171.6120 to 188.1907 deg, Dec -15.6584 to -4.2135 deg
Loaded 4776 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3415 out of 3518 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3518 out of 5414 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits (aperture=5.9)
Read 5369 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 171.6120 to 188.1907 deg, Dec -15.6584 to -4.2135 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 171.6120 to 188.1907 deg, Dec -15.6584 to -4.2135 deg
Loaded 4776 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3416 out of 3512 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3512 out of 5369 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits (aperture=5.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 3 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
2.1 pix Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
2.2 pix fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
2.2 pix fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.0 mag. Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
15.0 mag. Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
14.9 mag. fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
14.9 mag. fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.9 (SNR ) 11.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.OyWfeO4uFR (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_000704_TTUQ1b1x1_1052467_LsAtt6fm/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=373, passed=5414
Got 5414 stars (including 5029 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5414 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.7 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 965 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5366 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.7 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5367 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5367 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 971 stars left (next iteration limit 1068)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits N_match=971 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.284 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.275 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.390 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.237 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.257 n_q1=234 n_q2=227 n_q3=240 n_q4=270 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.374
The image catalog is written to wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits -region wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.cM1VTjxQWE (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_000704_TTUQ1b1x1_1052467_LsAtt6fm/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=356, passed=5369
Got 5369 stars (including 5000 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5369 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.7 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 964 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5325 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.7 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5327 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5327 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 970 stars left (next iteration limit 1067)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits N_match=970 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.329 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.353 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.414 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.274 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.306 n_q1=232 n_q2=231 n_q3=242 n_q4=265 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.259
The image catalog is written to wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits -region wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Kf6JHhOcGV (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_000704_TTUQ1b1x1_1052467_LsAtt6fm/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_000704_TTUQ1b1x1_1052467_LsAtt6fm/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_000704_TTUQ1b1x1_1052467_LsAtt6fm/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_000704_TTUQ1b1x1_1052467_LsAtt6fm/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_000704_TTUQ1b1x1_1052467_LsAtt6fm/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_000704_TTUQ1b1x1_1052467_LsAtt6fm/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_000704_TTUQ1b1x1_1052467_LsAtt6fm/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_000704_TTUQ1b1x1_1052467_LsAtt6fm/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=371, passed=5305
Got 5305 stars (including 4927 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5305 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 965 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5261 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5260 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5260 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 972 stars left (next iteration limit 1069)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits N_match=972 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.380 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.427 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.435 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.341 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.330 n_q1=239 n_q2=233 n_q3=241 n_q4=259 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.145
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_000704_TTUQ1b1x1_1052467_LsAtt6fm/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits -region wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.rHt1lBkr6n (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_000704_TTUQ1b1x1_1052467_LsAtt6fm/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_000704_TTUQ1b1x1_1052467_LsAtt6fm/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_000704_TTUQ1b1x1_1052467_LsAtt6fm/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_000704_TTUQ1b1x1_1052467_LsAtt6fm/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_000704_TTUQ1b1x1_1052467_LsAtt6fm/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_000704_TTUQ1b1x1_1052467_LsAtt6fm/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_000704_TTUQ1b1x1_1052467_LsAtt6fm/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_000704_TTUQ1b1x1_1052467_LsAtt6fm/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=364, passed=5282
Got 5282 stars (including 4915 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5282 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 963 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5233 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5234 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5234 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 970 stars left (next iteration limit 1067)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits N_match=970 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.379 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.360 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.492 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.308 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.354 n_q1=247 n_q2=228 n_q3=241 n_q4=254 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.298
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_000704_TTUQ1b1x1_1052467_LsAtt6fm/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits -region wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_000704_TTUQ1b1x1_1052467_LsAtt6fm/wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_000704_TTUQ1b1x1_1052467_LsAtt6fm/wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Vir-10-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 12:04:10.41 -10:38:23.2: 12.05 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 12:12:30.76 -07:37:11.8: 11.96 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 12:04:10.41 -10:38:23.2: 12.08 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.07 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:04:10.41 -10:38:23.2: ref_mag=12.07 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0837 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 12:12:30.76 -07:37:11.8: 11.97 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.97 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:12:30.76 -07:37:11.8: ref_mag=11.97 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9991 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20345_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 20345_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20348_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 20348_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20349_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 20349_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:59:46.78 -13:14:52.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Vir-10-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_000704_TTUQ1b1x1_1052467_LsAtt6fm/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_000704_TTUQ1b1x1_1052467_LsAtt6fm/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_000704_TTUQ1b1x1_1052467_LsAtt6fm/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_000704_TTUQ1b1x1_1052467_LsAtt6fm/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_000704_TTUQ1b1x1_1052467_LsAtt6fm/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_000704_TTUQ1b1x1_1052467_LsAtt6fm/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_000704_TTUQ1b1x1_1052467_LsAtt6fm/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_000704_TTUQ1b1x1_1052467_LsAtt6fm/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_000704_TTUQ1b1x1_1052467_LsAtt6fm/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_000704_TTUQ1b1x1_1052467_LsAtt6fm/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_000704_TTUQ1b1x1_1052467_LsAtt6fm/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_000704_TTUQ1b1x1_1052467_LsAtt6fm/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_000704_TTUQ1b1x1_1052467_LsAtt6fm/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_000704_TTUQ1b1x1_1052467_LsAtt6fm/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_000704_TTUQ1b1x1_1052467_LsAtt6fm/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_000704_TTUQ1b1x1_1052467_LsAtt6fm/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
The guess is 605 arcmin.
The guess is 605 arcmin.
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits was not found.
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_000704_TTUQ1b1x1_1052467_LsAtt6fm/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_000704_TTUQ1b1x1_1052467_LsAtt6fm/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
The guess is 573 arcmin.
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
The guess is 571 arcmin.
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits was not found.
verification OK: wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
verification OK: wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
Generating wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits.cat from image00003.cat
Generating wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits.cat from image00004.cat
Generating wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits.cat from image00001.cat
Generating wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits.cat from image00002.cat
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
Catalog wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits created.
Catalog wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
verification OK: wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
verification OK: wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_000704_TTUQ1b1x1_1052467_LsAtt6fm/util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
verification OK: wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:59:50.165 -09:57:15.79 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
Image size: 941.4'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:59:48.911 -09:57:05.13 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
Image size: 941.3'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:00:03.449 -09:59:35.68 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
Image size: 941.3'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:00:03.184 -10:00:19.72 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 33704 stars ###
### Converted positions of 33572 stars ###
'wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
### Converted positions of 33478 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_000704_TTUQ1b1x1_1052467_LsAtt6fm/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky1099277.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
### Converted positions of 33871 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_000704_TTUQ1b1x1_1052467_LsAtt6fm/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky1099266.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_000704_TTUQ1b1x1_1052467_LsAtt6fm/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky1099256.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_000704_TTUQ1b1x1_1052467_LsAtt6fm/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky1099278.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:00:03.184 -10:00:19.72 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:59:48.911 -09:57:05.13 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 12:00:03.184 -10:00:19.72
Second-epoch image center 11:59:48.911 -09:57:05.13
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0797 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:59:50.165 -09:57:15.79 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 12:00:03.184 -10:00:19.72
Second-epoch image center 11:59:50.165 -09:57:15.79
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0739 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
ref2=wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
new1=wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
new2=wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
reference average sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
INFO: WCS quality sigma_overall_arcsec not available for comparison (1st new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality sigma_overall_arcsec not available for comparison (2nd new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio not available for comparison (1st new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio not available for comparison (2nd new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 11:59:48.911 -09:57:05.13
Second-epoch second image center 11:59:50.165 -09:57:15.79
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00594 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits &> /tmp/tmp.iXLPmPYZpn
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Pi0WeGJDl5
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_000704_TTUQ1b1x1_1052467_LsAtt6fm/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits &> /tmp/tmp.d3KMCv4F7f
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_000704_TTUQ1b1x1_1052467_LsAtt6fm/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_000704_TTUQ1b1x1_1052467_LsAtt6fm/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits &> /tmp/tmp.0wOKC9szpk
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_000704_TTUQ1b1x1_1052467_LsAtt6fm/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits and wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits and wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits and wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits) and catalog (wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 33704 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 171.5751 to 188.2422 deg, Dec -15.6756 to -4.1628 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 171.5751 to 188.2422 deg, Dec -15.6756 to -4.1628 deg
Loaded 4830 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3511 out of 3743 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3743 out of 33704 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.569300
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.569300
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.41
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.16
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.16
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 33704 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 171.5751 to 188.2422 deg, Dec -15.6756 to -4.1628 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 171.5751 to 188.2422 deg, Dec -15.6756 to -4.1628 deg
Loaded 4830 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3511 out of 3743 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3743 out of 33704 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits (aperture=4.6)
Read 33871 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 171.5750 to 188.2422 deg, Dec -15.6584 to -4.1581 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 171.5750 to 188.2422 deg, Dec -15.6584 to -4.1581 deg
Loaded 4822 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3516 out of 3745 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3745 out of 33871 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits (aperture=4.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 87 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
2.0 pix Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
2.0 pix fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
2.0 pix fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
2.0 pix wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
2.0 pix wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
15.2 mag. Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
15.1 mag. fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
15.1 mag. fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.1 (SNR ) 14.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.iXLPmPYZpn (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_000704_TTUQ1b1x1_1052467_LsAtt6fm/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=1232, passed=33691
Got 33691 stars (including 32410 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 33691 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 431 (Dec -15.7 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 964 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33453 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 431 (Dec -15.7 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33452 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33452 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 971 stars left (next iteration limit 1068)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits N_match=971 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.283 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.264 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.372 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.246 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.255 n_q1=233 n_q2=233 n_q3=239 n_q4=266 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.313
The image catalog is written to wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits -region wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Pi0WeGJDl5 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_000704_TTUQ1b1x1_1052467_LsAtt6fm/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=1199, passed=33862
Got 33862 stars (including 32597 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 33862 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 431 (Dec -15.7 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 968 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33593 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 431 (Dec -15.7 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33592 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33592 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 973 stars left (next iteration limit 1070)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits N_match=973 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.330 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.336 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.400 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.268 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.314 n_q1=235 n_q2=237 n_q3=237 n_q4=264 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.214
The image catalog is written to wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits -region wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.d3KMCv4F7f (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_000704_TTUQ1b1x1_1052467_LsAtt6fm/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_000704_TTUQ1b1x1_1052467_LsAtt6fm/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_000704_TTUQ1b1x1_1052467_LsAtt6fm/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_000704_TTUQ1b1x1_1052467_LsAtt6fm/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_000704_TTUQ1b1x1_1052467_LsAtt6fm/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_000704_TTUQ1b1x1_1052467_LsAtt6fm/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_000704_TTUQ1b1x1_1052467_LsAtt6fm/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_000704_TTUQ1b1x1_1052467_LsAtt6fm/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=27, blended=1261, passed=33545
Got 33545 stars (including 32224 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 33545 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 431 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 964 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33291 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 431 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33291 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33291 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 972 stars left (next iteration limit 1069)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits N_match=972 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.387 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.423 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.435 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.342 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.348 n_q1=238 n_q2=241 n_q3=239 n_q4=254 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.126
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_000704_TTUQ1b1x1_1052467_LsAtt6fm/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits -region wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.0wOKC9szpk (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_000704_TTUQ1b1x1_1052467_LsAtt6fm/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_000704_TTUQ1b1x1_1052467_LsAtt6fm/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_000704_TTUQ1b1x1_1052467_LsAtt6fm/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_000704_TTUQ1b1x1_1052467_LsAtt6fm/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_000704_TTUQ1b1x1_1052467_LsAtt6fm/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_000704_TTUQ1b1x1_1052467_LsAtt6fm/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_000704_TTUQ1b1x1_1052467_LsAtt6fm/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_000704_TTUQ1b1x1_1052467_LsAtt6fm/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=20, blended=1235, passed=33458
Got 33458 stars (including 32168 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 33458 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 431 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 962 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33187 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 431 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33186 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33186 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 970 stars left (next iteration limit 1067)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits N_match=970 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.375 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.370 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.491 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.307 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.341 n_q1=249 n_q2=236 n_q3=236 n_q4=249 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.310
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_000704_TTUQ1b1x1_1052467_LsAtt6fm/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits -region wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_000704_TTUQ1b1x1_1052467_LsAtt6fm/wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_000704_TTUQ1b1x1_1052467_LsAtt6fm/wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Vir-10-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 11:46:06.92 -11:33:35.7: 12.88 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 12:21:02.24 -14:27:39.6: 12.99 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 11:53:25.74 -07:30:48.0: 14.92 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 12:06:25.70 -06:39:08.6: 14.26 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 11:36:34.81 -08:14:40.3: 15.73 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 11:30:44.57 -08:40:39.1: 15.65 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 12:25:29.12 -09:16:23.7: 15.59 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 12:17:24.88 -11:59:08.3: 15.70 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 11:46:06.92 -11:33:35.7: 12.88 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 12:21:02.24 -14:27:39.6: 12.90 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 12:06:25.70 -06:39:08.6: 14.39 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 11:53:25.74 -07:30:48.0: 14.81 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.88 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.94 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:46:06.92 -11:33:35.7: ref_mag=12.88 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1973 delta=-0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.32 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:21:02.24 -14:27:39.6: ref_mag=12.94 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2855 delta=-0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.85 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:06:25.70 -06:39:08.6: ref_mag=14.32 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.6905 delta=-0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:53:25.74 -07:30:48.0: ref_mag=14.85 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.5976 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 12:27:37.32 -14:56:19.5: 14.63 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 12:30:28.20 -08:08:53.2: 14.61 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 11:36:34.81 -08:14:40.3: 15.77 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 11:30:44.57 -08:40:39.1: 15.68 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 12:17:24.88 -11:59:08.3: 15.69 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 12:25:29.12 -09:16:23.7: 15.61 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 12:27:37.32 -14:56:19.5: 14.60 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.61 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 12:30:28.20 -08:08:53.2: 14.77 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:27:37.32 -14:56:19.5: ref_mag=14.61 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.2634 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.68 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:30:28.20 -08:08:53.2: ref_mag=14.68 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.2378 delta=0.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 11:38:34.09 -05:01:31.6: 15.71 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 12:27:26.02 -09:37:41.9: 14.43 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 12:28:27.34 -14:36:21.6: 14.76 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 12:25:34.30 -11:05:42.8: 14.74 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 11:38:34.09 -05:01:31.6: 15.71 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 12:28:27.34 -14:36:21.6: 15.01 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 12:27:26.02 -09:37:41.9: 14.50 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.85 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:28:27.34 -14:36:21.6: ref_mag=14.85 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=14.3637 delta=0.49 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.47 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:27:26.02 -09:37:41.9: ref_mag=14.47 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.5270 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 12:29:39.90 -09:52:53.0: 14.57 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 11:42:35.47 -05:49:01.2: 14.49 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 12:25:34.30 -11:05:42.8: 14.75 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.75 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:25:34.30 -11:05:42.8: ref_mag=14.75 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.4844 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 12:29:39.90 -09:52:53.0: 14.91 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 11:42:35.47 -05:49:01.2: 14.42 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.68 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:29:39.90 -09:52:53.0: ref_mag=14.68 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.6151 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.45 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:42:35.47 -05:49:01.2: ref_mag=14.45 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.4363 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 12:22:38.01 -14:25:33.4: 14.54 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 12:29:29.77 -06:06:01.8: 14.91 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 12:27:22.84 -09:05:50.6: 15.36 +/- 0.31 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 12:22:38.01 -14:25:33.4: 14.47 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 12:29:29.77 -06:06:01.8: 14.79 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.50 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.84 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:22:38.01 -14:25:33.4: ref_mag=14.50 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.5140 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:29:29.77 -06:06:01.8: ref_mag=14.84 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.4661 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 12:27:23.76 -11:29:30.8: 14.90 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 12:27:22.84 -09:05:50.6: 14.95 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 11:29:40.09 -11:55:39.6: 14.67 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.07 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:27:22.84 -09:05:50.6: ref_mag=15.07 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=14.5431 delta=0.53 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 11:29:40.09 -11:55:39.6: 14.89 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 12:27:23.76 -11:29:30.8: 14.82 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.76 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.85 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:29:40.09 -11:55:39.6: ref_mag=14.76 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.4302 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:27:23.76 -11:29:30.8: ref_mag=14.85 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.4837 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 12:14:50.84 -15:07:10.9: 14.47 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 12:23:10.72 -14:09:48.3: 14.79 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 12:29:32.54 -09:21:25.0: 14.70 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 12:23:10.72 -14:09:48.3: 14.80 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 12:14:50.84 -15:07:10.9: 14.80 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.79 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.58 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:23:10.72 -14:09:48.3: ref_mag=14.79 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.5410 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:14:50.84 -15:07:10.9: ref_mag=14.58 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.5019 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 12:29:32.54 -09:21:25.0: 14.81 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.75 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:29:32.54 -09:21:25.0: ref_mag=14.75 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.6291 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 12:28:47.15 -06:07:11.8: 14.72 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 12:29:10.86 -07:55:20.8: 14.64 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 12:28:47.15 -06:07:11.8: 14.79 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 12:29:10.86 -07:55:20.8: 15.16 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.75 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.79 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:28:47.15 -06:07:11.8: ref_mag=14.75 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.5328 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:29:10.86 -07:55:20.8: ref_mag=14.79 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.5477 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 12:23:39.31 -05:49:18.4: 14.84 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 12:25:28.63 -08:34:29.3: 14.84 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 12:20:36.56 -09:19:52.1: 14.60 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 12:23:39.31 -05:49:18.4: 14.86 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.85 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:23:39.31 -05:49:18.4: ref_mag=14.85 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.7241 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 12:25:28.63 -08:34:29.3: 15.03 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.92 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:25:28.63 -08:34:29.3: ref_mag=14.92 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.6000 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 12:27:46.18 -13:57:51.8: 14.93 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 12:25:22.29 -08:05:37.2: 14.74 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 12:20:36.56 -09:19:52.1: 14.76 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.66 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:20:36.56 -09:19:52.1: ref_mag=14.66 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.6251 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 12:27:46.18 -13:57:51.8: 14.60 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 12:25:22.29 -08:05:37.2: 14.53 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.71 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:27:46.18 -13:57:51.8: ref_mag=14.71 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.5830 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.62 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:25:22.29 -08:05:37.2: ref_mag=14.62 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.5992 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 12:24:53.98 -07:39:47.3: 14.81 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 12:23:31.41 -12:36:07.0: 14.58 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 12:25:13.48 -14:06:56.2: 14.78 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 12:24:53.98 -07:39:47.3: 15.09 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.91 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:24:53.98 -07:39:47.3: ref_mag=14.91 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.5791 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 12:23:31.41 -12:36:07.0: 14.63 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.61 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:23:31.41 -12:36:07.0: ref_mag=14.61 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.5575 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 12:28:46.34 -06:42:52.7: 15.04 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 12:25:13.48 -14:06:56.2: 14.57 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 12:27:33.31 -10:05:07.2: 14.89 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.65 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:25:13.48 -14:06:56.2: ref_mag=14.65 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.4811 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 12:28:46.34 -06:42:52.7: 15.50 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 12:27:33.31 -10:05:07.2: 15.27 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.04 +/- 0.23
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.02 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:28:46.34 -06:42:52.7: ref_mag=15.04 +/- 0.23 new_mean_mag=14.8137 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:27:33.31 -10:05:07.2: ref_mag=15.02 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.7072 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 12:29:25.02 -11:06:35.3: 15.05 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 11:33:50.06 -12:35:22.4: 14.72 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 11:50:59.91 -13:01:56.4: 14.99 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 12:29:25.02 -11:06:35.3: 15.03 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.04 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:29:25.02 -11:06:35.3: ref_mag=15.04 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=14.6910 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 11:33:50.06 -12:35:22.4: 14.63 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.67 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:33:50.06 -12:35:22.4: ref_mag=14.67 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.4062 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 12:21:58.73 -14:41:37.6: 14.55 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 11:50:59.91 -13:01:56.4: 14.82 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 12:22:21.77 -12:08:07.3: 14.92 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.89 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:50:59.91 -13:01:56.4: ref_mag=14.89 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.5799 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 12:22:21.77 -12:08:07.3: 15.15 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 12:21:58.73 -14:41:37.6: 14.77 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.02 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.64 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:22:21.77 -12:08:07.3: ref_mag=15.02 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.7133 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:21:58.73 -14:41:37.6: ref_mag=14.64 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.6155 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 12:25:48.71 -12:33:58.7: 14.63 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 12:23:47.65 -07:06:38.8: 14.94 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 12:26:32.17 -07:01:35.5: 14.68 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 12:25:48.71 -12:33:58.7: 15.06 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.77 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:25:48.71 -12:33:58.7: ref_mag=14.77 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.5328 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 12:23:47.65 -07:06:38.8: 14.83 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.88 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:23:47.65 -07:06:38.8: ref_mag=14.88 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.5815 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 12:30:53.70 -05:47:02.0: 14.50 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 12:27:31.90 -08:51:31.9: 14.97 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 12:26:32.17 -07:01:35.5: 14.75 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.71 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:26:32.17 -07:01:35.5: ref_mag=14.71 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.6756 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 12:30:53.70 -05:47:02.0: 14.63 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 12:27:31.90 -08:51:31.9: 15.03 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.56 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:30:53.70 -05:47:02.0: ref_mag=14.56 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.7470 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.00 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:27:31.90 -08:51:31.9: ref_mag=15.00 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.5495 delta=0.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 12:25:08.64 -13:31:55.5: 14.93 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 12:17:26.65 -08:24:45.8: 14.91 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 11:40:40.29 -05:51:10.2: 14.84 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 12:25:08.64 -13:31:55.5: 15.18 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.03 +/- 0.18
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:25:08.64 -13:31:55.5: ref_mag=15.03 +/- 0.18 new_mean_mag=14.7008 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 12:17:26.65 -08:24:45.8: 14.86 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.88 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:17:26.65 -08:24:45.8: ref_mag=14.88 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.7449 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 12:24:36.86 -07:29:11.0: 14.84 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 12:24:21.83 -14:41:31.8: 14.64 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 11:40:40.29 -05:51:10.2: 14.68 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.74 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:40:40.29 -05:51:10.2: ref_mag=14.74 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.7226 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 12:24:36.86 -07:29:11.0: 14.99 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 12:24:21.83 -14:41:31.8: 15.09 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.91 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:24:36.86 -07:29:11.0: ref_mag=14.91 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.7868 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.78 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:24:21.83 -14:41:31.8: ref_mag=14.78 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.6025 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 12:22:48.40 -12:06:39.1: 14.75 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 12:29:48.40 -09:33:27.6: 14.93 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 12:31:30.36 -08:06:37.7: 14.78 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 12:22:48.40 -12:06:39.1: 14.75 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.75 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:22:48.40 -12:06:39.1: ref_mag=14.75 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.6705 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 12:29:48.40 -09:33:27.6: 15.03 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.97 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:29:48.40 -09:33:27.6: ref_mag=14.97 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.6193 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 12:25:26.08 -07:41:17.7: 14.69 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 12:31:30.36 -08:06:37.7: 14.87 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.82 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:31:30.36 -08:06:37.7: ref_mag=14.82 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.7166 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 12:08:33.15 -12:44:00.0: 14.64 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 12:25:26.08 -07:41:17.7: 15.18 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.83 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:25:26.08 -07:41:17.7: ref_mag=14.83 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.6152 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 12:08:33.15 -12:44:00.0: 14.64 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.64 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:08:33.15 -12:44:00.0: ref_mag=14.64 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.6540 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 12:27:23.67 -11:16:40.3: 14.86 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 12:29:58.99 -12:01:44.1: 15.03 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 12:21:18.59 -12:53:26.4: 15.21 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 12:11:50.08 -14:06:01.7: 15.01 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 12:20:14.71 -11:52:37.3: 14.81 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 12:27:23.67 -11:16:40.3: 14.64 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 12:24:10.26 -11:03:20.2: 14.77 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.73 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:27:23.67 -11:16:40.3: ref_mag=14.73 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.7340 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 12:21:18.59 -12:53:26.4: 14.77 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.90 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 12:29:58.99 -12:01:44.1: 14.82 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:21:18.59 -12:53:26.4: ref_mag=14.90 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.6780 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.90 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 12:11:50.08 -14:06:01.7: 14.91 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:29:58.99 -12:01:44.1: ref_mag=14.90 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=14.6884 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.96 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 12:20:14.71 -11:52:37.3: 15.02 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:11:50.08 -14:06:01.7: ref_mag=14.96 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.7215 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.90 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:20:14.71 -11:52:37.3: ref_mag=14.90 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.8116 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 12:24:10.26 -11:03:20.2: 14.90 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.83 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:24:10.26 -11:03:20.2: ref_mag=14.83 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.7213 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 11:43:11.05 -14:23:08.7: 14.83 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 12:03:07.27 -14:11:41.9: 14.97 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 11:36:25.03 -04:27:04.1: 15.39 +/- 0.29 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 12:09:35.24 -14:50:22.5: 14.68 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 12:03:07.27 -14:11:41.9: 15.11 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 11:43:11.05 -14:23:08.7: 15.04 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.03 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.92 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:03:07.27 -14:11:41.9: ref_mag=15.03 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.7877 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:43:11.05 -14:23:08.7: ref_mag=14.92 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.5660 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 11:31:10.88 -13:11:32.6: 14.67 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 11:32:07.95 -11:04:08.3: 14.70 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 11:32:04.53 -12:09:44.0: 15.22 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 11:40:53.83 -13:38:49.2: 14.75 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 11:36:25.03 -04:27:04.1: 14.99 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 11:28:22.80 -12:29:46.5: 14.80 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.11 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:36:25.03 -04:27:04.1: ref_mag=15.11 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.6850 delta=0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 12:09:35.24 -14:50:22.5: 14.87 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.76 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:09:35.24 -14:50:22.5: ref_mag=14.76 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.7522 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 11:31:10.88 -13:11:32.6: 15.04 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 11:32:07.95 -11:04:08.3: 14.90 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.79 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.79 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:31:10.88 -13:11:32.6: ref_mag=14.79 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.5957 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:32:07.95 -11:04:08.3: ref_mag=14.79 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.7556 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 11:32:04.53 -12:09:44.0: 14.58 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 11:40:53.83 -13:38:49.2: 15.26 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 11:28:22.80 -12:29:46.5: 14.90 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.74 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.90 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:32:04.53 -12:09:44.0: ref_mag=14.74 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.6414 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:40:53.83 -13:38:49.2: ref_mag=14.90 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.6784 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.84 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:28:22.80 -12:29:46.5: ref_mag=14.84 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.7060 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52854.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52864.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52870.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52884.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52985.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 8s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52645_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 52645_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52646_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 52646_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52647_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 52647_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:32:52.38 -11:50:34.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52650_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 52650_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:08:13.37 -13:34:49.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52654_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 52654_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:43:08.44 -10:38:24.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52656_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 52656_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:39:20.38 -10:37:07.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52657_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 52657_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52781_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 52781_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52802_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 52802_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:26:10.25 -09:37:49.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52818_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 52818_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52854_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133
Preparing report for the candidate 52854_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52864_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133
Preparing report for the candidate 52864_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52870_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133
Preparing report for the candidate 52870_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52884_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133
Preparing report for the candidate 52884_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52914_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 52914_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:21:04.11 -11:28:25.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52934_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 52934_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:29:46.16 -06:54:01.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52969_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 52969_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52974_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 52974_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52981_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 52981_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52985_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133
Preparing report for the candidate 52985_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52990_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 52990_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52995_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 52995_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53011_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 53011_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53012_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 53012_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53015_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 53015_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53016_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 53016_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53026_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 53026_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53031_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 53031_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53037_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 53037_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53041_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 53041_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53046_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 53046_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53047_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 53047_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53052_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 53052_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53062_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 53062_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53065_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 53065_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53067_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 53067_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53075_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 53075_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53077_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 53077_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53078_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 53078_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53080_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 53080_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53084_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 53084_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53086_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 53086_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53087_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 53087_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53096_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 53096_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53101_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 53101_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53105_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 53105_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53110_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 53110_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53112_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 53112_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53115_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 53115_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53118_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 53118_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53127_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 53127_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53128_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 53128_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53130_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 53130_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53135_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 53135_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53137_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 53137_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53138_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 53138_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53141_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 53141_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53142_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 53142_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53151_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 53151_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53152_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 53152_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53156_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 53156_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53160_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 53160_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53162_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 53162_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53163_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 53163_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53171_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 53171_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53173_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 53173_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53178_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 53178_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:33:38.36 -12:06:30.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53182_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 53182_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:15:38.76 -14:58:04.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53185_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 53185_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53187_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 53187_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53188_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 53188_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53190_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 53190_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53191_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 53191_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53192_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 53192_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53198_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 53198_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53200_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 53200_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53212_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 53212_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53214_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 53214_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53218_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 53218_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53223_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 53223_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53237_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 53237_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53238_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 53238_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53267_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 53267_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53279_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 53279_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53295_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 53295_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53307_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 53307_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 28133_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 28133_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-06-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
