This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235937_TTUQ2b1x1_874937_d3YmbYLd
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 11.2037 2461171.7037 11.58 16:55:23.22 -08:50:50.0
10.57479 20.87814 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 10.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.28 Bellona 1 -0 1 11.6 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 16:55:23.22 -08:50:50.0: 15.30 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 16:55:23.22 -08:50:50.0: 15.32 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461171.7037,11.58,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260511.2037 11.58CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 11.2037 2461171.7037 12.47 17:19:17.41 -08:37:03.8
14.12982 16.02263 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 10.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.258 Tyche 1 -0 1 12.4 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 17:19:17.41 -08:37:03.8: 15.52 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 17:19:17.41 -08:37:03.8: 15.52 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461171.7037,12.47,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260511.2037 12.47CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 11.2037 2461171.7037 13.22 17:23:24.51 -10:31:33.7
12.99815 14.15755 galactic Ser Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 10.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.412 Elisabetha 1 -1 1 13.3 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 17:23:24.51 -10:31:33.7: 15.44 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 17:23:24.51 -10:31:33.7: 15.44 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 11.2037* 17 23 24.51 -10 31 33.7 13.2 U Ser 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461171.7037,13.22,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260511.2037 13.22CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 11.2037 2461171.7037 13.77 17:12:45.70 -11:29:19.2
10.71266 15.85462 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.5" and 9.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.740 Cantabia 0 -0 1 13.7 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 17:12:45.70 -11:29:19.2: 15.51 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 17:12:45.70 -11:29:19.2: 15.53 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461171.7037,13.77,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260511.2037 13.77CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 11.2037 2461171.7037 14.37 16:56:34.15 -12:11:12.2
7.80606 18.76778 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.2" and 10.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.512 Taurinensis 1 -2 2 13.8 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 16:56:34.15 -12:11:12.2: 15.42 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 16:56:34.15 -12:11:12.2: 15.48 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461171.7037,14.37,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260511.2037 14.37CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461148.84898149 18.04.2026 08:22:22.001 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
First image: 2461148.84898149 18.04.2026 08:22:22.001 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
Last image: 2461171.70400780 11.05.2026 04:53:36.274 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235937_TTUQ2b1x1_874937_d3YmbYLd/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 8
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.01
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 2 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 3874
Objects passed selection criteria: 3866
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 3494.5
Average stars matched: 3417 (97.7822 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 110692 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun May 10 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-44-gd532a530
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-10)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon May 11 00:04:49 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461148.84898149 18.04.2026 08:22:22.001 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
First image: 2461148.84898149 18.04.2026 08:22:22.001 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
Last image: 2461171.70400780 11.05.2026 04:53:36.274 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235937_TTUQ2b1x1_874937_d3YmbYLd/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 145
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.56
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 14 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 40274
Objects passed selection criteria: 40219
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 37711.5
Average stars matched: 36245.2 (96.1119 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 145792 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun May 10 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-44-gd532a530
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-10)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon May 11 00:06:30 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235937_TTUQ2b1x1_874937_d3YmbYLd/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-52-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235937_TTUQ2b1x1_874937_d3YmbYLd/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235937_TTUQ2b1x1_874937_d3YmbYLd/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-52-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235937_TTUQ2b1x1_874937_d3YmbYLd/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461171.70349102
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235937_TTUQ2b1x1_874937_d3YmbYLd/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-52-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235937_TTUQ2b1x1_874937_d3YmbYLd/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-52-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235937_TTUQ2b1x1_874937_d3YmbYLd/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-52-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235937_TTUQ2b1x1_874937_d3YmbYLd/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235937_TTUQ2b1x1_874937_d3YmbYLd/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235937_TTUQ2b1x1_874937_d3YmbYLd/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235937_TTUQ2b1x1_874937_d3YmbYLd/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-52-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235937_TTUQ2b1x1_874937_d3YmbYLd/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235937_TTUQ2b1x1_874937_d3YmbYLd/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-52-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-52-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235937_TTUQ2b1x1_874937_d3YmbYLd/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-52-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235937_TTUQ2b1x1_874937_d3YmbYLd/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235937_TTUQ2b1x1_874937_d3YmbYLd/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
The guess is 605 arcmin.
The guess is 605 arcmin.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
No image with WCS calibration found for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235937_TTUQ2b1x1_874937_d3YmbYLd/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-52-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits .... Determining astrometry method...
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net software...
Choosing aperture...
Using the catalog image00003.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235937_TTUQ2b1x1_874937_d3YmbYLd/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-52-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits
No image with WCS calibration found for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235937_TTUQ2b1x1_874937_d3YmbYLd/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits .... Determining astrometry method...
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net software...
Choosing aperture...
Using the catalog image00004.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235937_TTUQ2b1x1_874937_d3YmbYLd/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235937_TTUQ2b1x1_874937_d3YmbYLd/lib/make_outxyls_for_astrometric_calibration found 3779 high-SNR stars for plate solving
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
This service uses tools provided by Astrometry.net.
For more information visit http://astrometry.net/
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
######### Trying to solve plate assuming 605' field of view #########
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235937_TTUQ2b1x1_874937_d3YmbYLd/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-52-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net code
The guess is 571 arcmin.
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
IMAGE_SIZE= --width 9576 --height 6388 SCALE_LOW=544.5 SCALE_HIGH=3025.0
Using solve-field binary
/usr/local/astrometry/bin/solve-field
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235937_TTUQ2b1x1_874937_d3YmbYLd/lib/make_outxyls_for_astrometric_calibration found 3783 high-SNR stars for plate solving
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out985268.xyls"...
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits was not found.
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits'
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
The guess is 571 arcmin.
This service uses tools provided by Astrometry.net.
For more information visit http://astrometry.net/
verification OK: wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
######### Trying to solve plate assuming 605' field of view #########
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235937_TTUQ2b1x1_874937_d3YmbYLd/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net code
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
verification OK: wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
IMAGE_SIZE= --width 9576 --height 6388 SCALE_LOW=544.5 SCALE_HIGH=3025.0
Using solve-field binary
/usr/local/astrometry/bin/solve-field
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out985270.xyls"...
Generating wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits.cat from image00002.cat
Generating wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat from image00001.cat
Catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
Catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
verification OK: wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
verification OK: wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
Image size: 937.6'x624.5' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:08:28.018 -09:57:35.75 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
Image size: 937.6'x624.5' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:08:29.180 -09:57:37.01 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 5776 stars ###
### Converted positions of 5737 stars ###
'wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235937_TTUQ2b1x1_874937_d3YmbYLd/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky985703.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235937_TTUQ2b1x1_874937_d3YmbYLd/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky985735.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading file "./out985270.axy"...
Reading file "./out985268.axy"...
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4119.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4119.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4118.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4118.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4117.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4117.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4116.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4116.fits, field objects 1-10).
log-odds ratio 426.766 (2.19891e+185), 45 match, 0 conflict, 83 distractors, 49 index.
RA,Dec = (257.17,-10.0096), pixel scale 5.95728 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++++++++++++++++++-++++++++-++--+++-+-+-++-+-++--++---+----------------+------------------+--------
log-odds ratio 438.263 (2.16346e+190), 46 match, 0 conflict, 94 distractors, 49 index.
RA,Dec = (257.159,-10.0224), pixel scale 5.95738 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++++++++++++++++++++++++-++-+++-+++---++++++--+--+------+---+----------+------------------------+--
Field 1: solved with index index-4115.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out985270.solved to indicate this.
Field 1: solved with index index-4115.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out985268.solved to indicate this.
Field: out985270.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (257.152482, -9.990822) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (17:08:36.596, -09:59:26.958).
Field size: 15.7422 x 10.5418 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -0.554138 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Inserting WCS header... Field: out985268.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (257.141217, -10.003443) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (17:08:33.892, -10:00:12.395).
Field size: 15.7426 x 10.5422 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -0.557189 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Inserting WCS header... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235937_TTUQ2b1x1_874937_d3YmbYLd/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits' -> 'fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235937_TTUQ2b1x1_874937_d3YmbYLd/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-52-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits' -> 'fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-52-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits'
WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M May 11 00:04 fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-52-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K May 11 00:04 out985268.wcs
Inserting WCS header (1st iteration local)... -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M May 11 00:04 fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K May 11 00:04 out985270.wcs
Inserting WCS header (1st iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits)... done!
Opening FITS image file fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-52-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-52-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits)... done!
done!
done!
All done!
done
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235937_TTUQ2b1x1_874937_d3YmbYLd/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits (fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits)
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
All done!
done
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235937_TTUQ2b1x1_874937_d3YmbYLd/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-52-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits (fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-52-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits)
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration01' / astrometry.net run
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration01' / astrometry.net run
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out985270.xyls"...
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out985268.xyls"...
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading file "./out985268.axy"...
Only searching for solutions within 15.6767 degrees of RA,Dec (257.142,-10.0026)
log-odds ratio 107.482 (4.7754e+46), 14 match, 0 conflict, 11 distractors, 23 index.
RA,Dec = (257.134,-10.0045), pixel scale 5.95738 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++++--++++----++--+---++(best)---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Reading file "./out985270.axy"...
Only searching for solutions within 15.6767 degrees of RA,Dec (257.153,-9.98999)
log-odds ratio 108.512 (1.33757e+47), 14 match, 0 conflict, 11 distractors, 23 index.
RA,Dec = (257.145,-9.99179), pixel scale 5.95733 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++++--++++--+--++---+--+(best)---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Field 1: solved with index index-4116.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out985268.solved to indicate this.
Field 1: solved with index index-4116.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out985270.solved to indicate this.
Field: out985268.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (257.140156, -10.002717) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (17:08:33.637, -10:00:09.780).
Field size: 15.7285 x 10.5437 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -0.557146 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Field: out985270.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (257.151383, -9.989947) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (17:08:36.332, -09:59:23.809).
Field size: 15.7281 x 10.5433 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -0.555727 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M May 11 00:04 fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K May 11 00:04 out985270.wcs
Inserting WCS header (2nd iteration local)... WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M May 11 00:04 fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-52-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K May 11 00:04 out985268.wcs
Inserting WCS header (2nd iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits for reading... Opening FITS image file fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-52-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits)... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-52-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits)... done!
done!
done!
done!
All done!
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors.
All done!
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors.
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration02' / astrometry.net run
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration02' / astrometry.net run
The field of view is large: we'll try to run Astromety.net code on the image itself rather than a star list
The field of view is large: we'll try to run Astromety.net code on the image itself rather than a star list
Reading input file "wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-52-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits"...
Found an existing WCS header, will try to verify it.
Extracting sources...
Reading input file "wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits"...
Found an existing WCS header, will try to verify it.
Extracting sources...
simplexy: found 30298 sources.
simplexy: found 30030 sources.
Solving...
Solving...
Reading file "./wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172.axy"...
Verifying WCS using indices with quads of size [63.5408, 952.515] arcmin
Verifying WCS with index 39 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4117.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 103.25 (6.93608e+44), 13 match, 0 conflict, 268 distractors, 13 index.
RA,Dec = (257.151,-9.99078), pixel scale 5.96814 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ----+----+---------+-----+---------+-----+-----------+----+------------+-------------------------+--
Reading file "./wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-52-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.axy"...
Verifying WCS using indices with quads of size [63.5397, 952.499] arcmin
Verifying WCS with index 39 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4117.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 104.569 (2.5917e+45), 13 match, 0 conflict, 276 distractors, 13 index.
RA,Dec = (257.139,-10.0036), pixel scale 5.96804 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: --++--------+----+-+------+-------------------------------+--+-----------------+--------------------
--> log-odds 103.25
Verifying WCS with index 40 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4116.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 226.748 (2.98767e+98), 23 match, 0 conflict, 258 distractors, 23 index.
RA,Dec = (257.151,-9.99078), pixel scale 5.96814 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: --+-+----+------+--+-----+----++---+-+---+-----------+----+------------++-------+----+-----------+--
--> log-odds 104.569
Verifying WCS with index 40 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4116.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 223.227 (8.83238e+96), 23 match, 0 conflict, 266 distractors, 23 index.
RA,Dec = (257.139,-10.0036), pixel scale 5.96804 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: --++--+-----+----+-+----+-+----+-----+-------+------------+--+----------+------+-------+--------+---
--> log-odds 226.748
Verifying WCS with index 41 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4115.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 519.441 (3.89478e+225), 49 match, 0 conflict, 232 distractors, 49 index.
RA,Dec = (257.151,-9.99078), pixel scale 5.96814 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -++-+---++--++--+--+-----+----+++--+++---+-+--++-+---+----++-----+--+--++--++---+-+-++---+-------+-+
--> log-odds 223.227
Verifying WCS with index 41 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4115.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 513.862 (1.46967e+223), 49 match, 0 conflict, 240 distractors, 49 index.
RA,Dec = (257.139,-10.0036), pixel scale 5.96804 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: --++--+--+--++--++-++---+-++---+--++++----+--+--------+--++-+++---------+--+---++--++--+----+---+---
--> log-odds 519.441
Verifying WCS with index 42 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4114.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 958.433 (inf), 91 match, 0 conflict, 313 distractors, 91 index.
RA,Dec = (257.151,-9.99078), pixel scale 5.96814 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -++-+---+++++++++-++-+---++--++++--+++++++-+--++-+---+--+-++--+--+--+--++--+++--+-+-++---+--+-++-+-+
--> log-odds 513.862
Verifying WCS with index 42 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4114.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 947.222 (inf), 91 match, 0 conflict, 282 distractors, 91 index.
RA,Dec = (257.139,-10.0036), pixel scale 5.96804 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: --++--+--+--+++-++-++-+-+-++-+-+--+++++++-+--+--+---+-+--++-++++-+------+-++-+-++-+++--+-+--++--+---
--> log-odds 958.433
Verifying WCS with index 43 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4113.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 1877.42 (inf), 186 match, 1 conflict, 576 distractors, 189 index.
RA,Dec = (257.151,-9.99078), pixel scale 5.96814 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++++--++++++++++++++-++++++-++++++++++++++++-++++++-++++-++++++-++-+++++-++++++++++++++-++-++++++++
--> log-odds 947.222
Verifying WCS with index 43 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4113.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 1857.21 (inf), 185 match, 0 conflict, 706 distractors, 188 index.
RA,Dec = (257.139,-10.0036), pixel scale 5.96804 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++-++-++--++++++++++++++++--+++++++++++++++++++++-+++--+++++++-+---+++++++++++++++++-+++-+++-+++++
--> log-odds 1877.42
Verifying WCS with index 44 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4112.fits)
--> log-odds 1857.21
Verifying WCS with index 44 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4112.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 3487.69 (inf), 371 match, 0 conflict, 993 distractors, 377 index.
RA,Dec = (257.151,-9.99078), pixel scale 5.96814 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-++++++++++++++++++++++++++-++++++++++++++++++++++-+++++++-+++++++++++++
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 3498.79 (inf), 372 match, 0 conflict, 1178 distractors, 377 index.
RA,Dec = (257.139,-10.0036), pixel scale 5.96804 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-++++++++++++++++++++++-++++++++++++++++++-++++++++++++++-++++++++++++++
--> log-odds 3498.79
Verifying WCS with index 45 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4111.fits)
--> log-odds 3487.69
Verifying WCS with index 45 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4111.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 6232.07 (inf), 713 match, 0 conflict, 1959 distractors, 728 index.
RA,Dec = (257.139,-10.0036), pixel scale 5.96804 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 6210.48 (inf), 713 match, 0 conflict, 2794 distractors, 727 index.
RA,Dec = (257.151,-9.99078), pixel scale 5.96814 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
--> log-odds 6232.07
Verifying WCS with index 46 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4110.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 11469 (inf), 1429 match, 1 conflict, 4641 distractors, 1452 index.
RA,Dec = (257.139,-10.0036), pixel scale 5.96804 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
--> log-odds 6210.48
Verifying WCS with index 46 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4110.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 11437.9 (inf), 1427 match, 1 conflict, 4366 distractors, 1452 index.
RA,Dec = (257.151,-9.99078), pixel scale 5.96814 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
--> log-odds 11469
Got 8 solutions.
Field: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-52-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (257.140857, -10.003367) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (17:08:33.806, -10:00:12.122).
Field size: 15.7275 x 10.5417 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -0.555131 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Creating new FITS file "./wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-52-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.new"...
--> log-odds 11437.9
Got 8 solutions.
Field: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (257.152080, -9.990688) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (17:08:36.499, -09:59:26.476).
Field size: 15.7273 x 10.5416 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -0.553088 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Creating new FITS file "./wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172.new"...
renamed 'wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-52-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.new' -> 'wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-52-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits'
renamed 'wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172.new' -> 'wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits'
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235937_TTUQ2b1x1_874937_d3YmbYLd/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-52-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-52-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-52-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-52-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits was not found.
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235937_TTUQ2b1x1_874937_d3YmbYLd/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-52-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-52-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Generating wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-52-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat from image00003.cat
Generating wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.cat from image00004.cat
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-52-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-52-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-52-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-52-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
Image size: 938.8'x624.5' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:08:34.006 -10:00:09.11 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
Image size: 938.7'x624.5' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:08:36.699 -09:59:23.47 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 3994 stars ###
### Converted positions of 3959 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-52-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235937_TTUQ2b1x1_874937_d3YmbYLd/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky989203.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235937_TTUQ2b1x1_874937_d3YmbYLd/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky989199.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-52-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits
wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits'
wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits'
wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-52-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-52-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-52-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-52-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits'
wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
Image size: 937.6'x624.5' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:08:28.018 -09:57:35.75 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-52-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-52-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Image size: 938.8'x624.5' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:08:34.006 -10:00:09.11 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:08:28.018 -09:57:35.75
Second-epoch image center 17:08:34.006 -10:00:09.11
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0492 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Image size: 938.7'x624.5' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:08:36.699 -09:59:23.47 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:08:28.018 -09:57:35.75
Second-epoch image center 17:08:36.699 -09:59:23.47
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0465 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
ref2=wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
new1=wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-52-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
new2=wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
reference average sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
INFO: WCS quality sigma_overall_arcsec not available for comparison (1st new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality sigma_overall_arcsec not available for comparison (2nd new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio not available for comparison (1st new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio not available for comparison (2nd new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 17:08:34.006 -10:00:09.11
Second-epoch second image center 17:08:36.699 -09:59:23.47
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01682 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits &> /tmp/tmp.bKER4RgjI3
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Vs0eOCfVbb
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235937_TTUQ2b1x1_874937_d3YmbYLd/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-52-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits &> /tmp/tmp.5SMATAs1zn
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235937_TTUQ2b1x1_874937_d3YmbYLd/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-52-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235937_TTUQ2b1x1_874937_d3YmbYLd/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits &> /tmp/tmp.yYdSUBLB01
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235937_TTUQ2b1x1_874937_d3YmbYLd/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits and wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits and wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits and wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits) and catalog (wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 5737 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 249.1339 to 265.2840 deg, Dec -15.2443 to -4.5570 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 249.1339 to 265.2840 deg, Dec -15.2443 to -4.5570 deg
Loaded 4155 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3239 out of 3334 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3334 out of 5737 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.672700
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.672700
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.01
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.66
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.66
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 5737 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 249.1339 to 265.2840 deg, Dec -15.2443 to -4.5570 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 249.1339 to 265.2840 deg, Dec -15.2443 to -4.5570 deg
Loaded 4155 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3239 out of 3334 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3334 out of 5737 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits (aperture=6.7)
Read 5776 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 249.1338 to 265.2840 deg, Dec -15.2443 to -4.5573 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 249.1338 to 265.2840 deg, Dec -15.2443 to -4.5573 deg
Loaded 4155 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3238 out of 3332 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3332 out of 5776 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits (aperture=6.7)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 3 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.5 pix Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
2.5 pix Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
2.4 pix fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-52-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits
2.5 pix fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
2.5 pix wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
2.5 pix wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.7 mag. Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
14.7 mag. Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-52-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.4 (SNR ) 11.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.bKER4RgjI3 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235937_TTUQ2b1x1_874937_d3YmbYLd/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=344, passed=5737
Got 5737 stars (including 5384 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5737 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.2 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 925 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5659 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.2 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5661 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5661 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.63"
Excluding outliers - 937 stars left (next iteration limit 1030)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits N_match=937 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.628 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.501 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.779 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.548 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.699 n_q1=183 n_q2=350 n_q3=215 n_q4=189 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.241
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits -region wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Vs0eOCfVbb (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235937_TTUQ2b1x1_874937_d3YmbYLd/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=340, passed=5776
Got 5776 stars (including 5426 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5776 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.2 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 926 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5678 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.2 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5677 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5677 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Excluding outliers - 937 stars left (next iteration limit 1030)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits N_match=937 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.587 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.480 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.679 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.515 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.618 n_q1=180 n_q2=353 n_q3=214 n_q4=190 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.156
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits -region wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.5SMATAs1zn (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235937_TTUQ2b1x1_874937_d3YmbYLd/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235937_TTUQ2b1x1_874937_d3YmbYLd/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-52-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235937_TTUQ2b1x1_874937_d3YmbYLd/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-52-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235937_TTUQ2b1x1_874937_d3YmbYLd/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-52-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235937_TTUQ2b1x1_874937_d3YmbYLd/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-52-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235937_TTUQ2b1x1_874937_d3YmbYLd/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-52-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235937_TTUQ2b1x1_874937_d3YmbYLd/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-52-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-52-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-52-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-52-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-52-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-52-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-52-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-52-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235937_TTUQ2b1x1_874937_d3YmbYLd/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-52-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-52-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=237, passed=3959
Got 3959 stars (including 3720 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-52-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3959 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013039 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010431 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 923 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3901 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3901 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3901 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
Excluding outliers - 937 stars left (next iteration limit 1030)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-52-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits N_match=937 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.634 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.551 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.787 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.559 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.667 n_q1=196 n_q2=323 n_q3=236 n_q4=182 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.240
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-52-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-52-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235937_TTUQ2b1x1_874937_d3YmbYLd/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-52-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-52-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-52-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.yYdSUBLB01 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235937_TTUQ2b1x1_874937_d3YmbYLd/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235937_TTUQ2b1x1_874937_d3YmbYLd/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235937_TTUQ2b1x1_874937_d3YmbYLd/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235937_TTUQ2b1x1_874937_d3YmbYLd/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235937_TTUQ2b1x1_874937_d3YmbYLd/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235937_TTUQ2b1x1_874937_d3YmbYLd/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235937_TTUQ2b1x1_874937_d3YmbYLd/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235937_TTUQ2b1x1_874937_d3YmbYLd/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=228, passed=3994
Got 3994 stars (including 3763 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3994 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013038 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010430 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 929 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.62"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3939 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.62"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3937 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.63"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3937 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.64"
Excluding outliers - 939 stars left (next iteration limit 1032)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits N_match=939 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.660 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.588 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.785 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.587 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.735 n_q1=190 n_q2=329 n_q3=235 n_q4=185 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.190
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235937_TTUQ2b1x1_874937_d3YmbYLd/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-52-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-52-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235937_TTUQ2b1x1_874937_d3YmbYLd/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-52-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235937_TTUQ2b1x1_874937_d3YmbYLd/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Oph-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 16:55:23.22 -08:50:50.0: 15.30 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 16:55:23.22 -08:50:50.0: 15.32 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20291.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 5s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20289_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172
The candidate 20289_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:07:25.69 -10:50:56.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20291_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172
Preparing report for the candidate 20291_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03187_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172
The candidate 03187_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:06:10.80 -10:28:58.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 6s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Oph-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
16:55:23.22 -08:50:50.0
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235937_TTUQ2b1x1_874937_d3YmbYLd/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-52-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235937_TTUQ2b1x1_874937_d3YmbYLd/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235937_TTUQ2b1x1_874937_d3YmbYLd/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-52-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235937_TTUQ2b1x1_874937_d3YmbYLd/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-52-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235937_TTUQ2b1x1_874937_d3YmbYLd/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235937_TTUQ2b1x1_874937_d3YmbYLd/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235937_TTUQ2b1x1_874937_d3YmbYLd/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-52-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235937_TTUQ2b1x1_874937_d3YmbYLd/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-52-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235937_TTUQ2b1x1_874937_d3YmbYLd/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235937_TTUQ2b1x1_874937_d3YmbYLd/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-52-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235937_TTUQ2b1x1_874937_d3YmbYLd/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235937_TTUQ2b1x1_874937_d3YmbYLd/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-52-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235937_TTUQ2b1x1_874937_d3YmbYLd/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235937_TTUQ2b1x1_874937_d3YmbYLd/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235937_TTUQ2b1x1_874937_d3YmbYLd/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-52-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-52-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235937_TTUQ2b1x1_874937_d3YmbYLd/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-52-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
The guess is 605 arcmin.
The guess is 605 arcmin.
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits was not found.
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-52-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-52-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-52-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-52-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-52-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits was not found.
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235937_TTUQ2b1x1_874937_d3YmbYLd/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235937_TTUQ2b1x1_874937_d3YmbYLd/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-52-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-52-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
The guess is 571 arcmin.
The guess is 571 arcmin.
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits was not found.
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
verification OK: wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
verification OK: wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
Generating wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-52-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat from image00003.cat
Generating wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.cat from image00004.cat
Generating wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat from image00001.cat
Generating wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits.cat from image00002.cat
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-52-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-52-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-52-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-52-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits created.
Catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
verification OK: wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
verification OK: wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
verification OK: wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
Image size: 938.8'x624.5' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:08:34.006 -10:00:09.11 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
Image size: 938.7'x624.5' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:08:36.699 -09:59:23.47 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
Image size: 937.6'x624.5' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:08:28.018 -09:57:35.75 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
Image size: 937.6'x624.5' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:08:29.180 -09:57:37.01 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 42508 stars ###
### Converted positions of 42717 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-52-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235937_TTUQ2b1x1_874937_d3YmbYLd/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky1042299.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-52-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235937_TTUQ2b1x1_874937_d3YmbYLd/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky1042308.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
### Converted positions of 57760 stars ###
'wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
### Converted positions of 57367 stars ###
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235937_TTUQ2b1x1_874937_d3YmbYLd/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky1042361.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
'wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235937_TTUQ2b1x1_874937_d3YmbYLd/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky1042360.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-52-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
Image size: 937.6'x624.5' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:08:28.018 -09:57:35.75 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-52-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-52-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Image size: 938.8'x624.5' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:08:34.006 -10:00:09.11 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:08:28.018 -09:57:35.75
Second-epoch image center 17:08:34.006 -10:00:09.11
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0492 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
Image size: 938.7'x624.5' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:08:36.699 -09:59:23.47 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:08:28.018 -09:57:35.75
Second-epoch image center 17:08:36.699 -09:59:23.47
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0465 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
ref2=wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
new1=wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-52-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
new2=wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
reference average sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
INFO: WCS quality sigma_overall_arcsec not available for comparison (1st new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality sigma_overall_arcsec not available for comparison (2nd new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio not available for comparison (1st new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio not available for comparison (2nd new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 17:08:34.006 -10:00:09.11
Second-epoch second image center 17:08:36.699 -09:59:23.47
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01682 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits &> /tmp/tmp.KOo1BW6E0m
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits &> /tmp/tmp.0VtFhYlV3g
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235937_TTUQ2b1x1_874937_d3YmbYLd/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-52-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits &> /tmp/tmp.DkOdFCHuqc
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235937_TTUQ2b1x1_874937_d3YmbYLd/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-52-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235937_TTUQ2b1x1_874937_d3YmbYLd/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits &> /tmp/tmp.0MnJjP51qa
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235937_TTUQ2b1x1_874937_d3YmbYLd/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits and wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits and wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits and wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits) and catalog (wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 57760 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 249.1175 to 265.2927 deg, Dec -15.2552 to -4.5449 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 249.1175 to 265.2927 deg, Dec -15.2552 to -4.5449 deg
Loaded 4170 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3226 out of 3611 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3611 out of 57760 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.433700
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.433700
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.56
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.87
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.87
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 57760 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 249.1175 to 265.2927 deg, Dec -15.2552 to -4.5449 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 249.1175 to 265.2927 deg, Dec -15.2552 to -4.5449 deg
Loaded 4170 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3226 out of 3611 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3611 out of 57760 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 57367 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 249.1323 to 265.3001 deg, Dec -15.2554 to -4.5454 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 249.1323 to 265.3001 deg, Dec -15.2554 to -4.5454 deg
Loaded 4168 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3229 out of 3611 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3611 out of 57367 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 88 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
2.2 pix Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
2.1 pix fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-52-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits
2.1 pix fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.9 mag. Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
14.9 mag. Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-52-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.6 (SNR ) 14.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.KOo1BW6E0m (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235937_TTUQ2b1x1_874937_d3YmbYLd/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=2917, passed=57752
Got 57752 stars (including 54750 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 57752 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 927 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 56908 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 56904 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 56904 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Excluding outliers - 940 stars left (next iteration limit 1034)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits N_match=940 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.661 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.527 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.789 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.534 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.663 n_q1=195 n_q2=361 n_q3=190 n_q4=194 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.194
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits -region wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.0VtFhYlV3g (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235937_TTUQ2b1x1_874937_d3YmbYLd/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=2923, passed=57361
Got 57361 stars (including 54345 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 57361 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 928 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 56663 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 56662 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 56662 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Excluding outliers - 941 stars left (next iteration limit 1035)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits N_match=941 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.604 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.523 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.658 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.551 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.665 n_q1=195 n_q2=358 n_q3=190 n_q4=198 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.101
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits -region wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.DkOdFCHuqc (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235937_TTUQ2b1x1_874937_d3YmbYLd/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235937_TTUQ2b1x1_874937_d3YmbYLd/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-52-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235937_TTUQ2b1x1_874937_d3YmbYLd/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-52-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235937_TTUQ2b1x1_874937_d3YmbYLd/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-52-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235937_TTUQ2b1x1_874937_d3YmbYLd/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-52-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235937_TTUQ2b1x1_874937_d3YmbYLd/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-52-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235937_TTUQ2b1x1_874937_d3YmbYLd/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-52-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-52-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-52-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-52-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-52-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-52-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-52-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-52-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235937_TTUQ2b1x1_874937_d3YmbYLd/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-52-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-52-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=1627, passed=42504
Got 42504 stars (including 40815 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-52-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 42504 stars from the SExtractor catalog
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235937_TTUQ2b1x1_874937_d3YmbYLd/util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013039 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010431 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 928 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42121 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42120 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42119 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Excluding outliers - 939 stars left (next iteration limit 1032)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-52-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits N_match=939 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.621 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.540 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.788 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.603 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.713 n_q1=204 n_q2=323 n_q3=213 n_q4=199 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.268
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-52-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-52-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235937_TTUQ2b1x1_874937_d3YmbYLd/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-52-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-52-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-52-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.0MnJjP51qa (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235937_TTUQ2b1x1_874937_d3YmbYLd/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235937_TTUQ2b1x1_874937_d3YmbYLd/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235937_TTUQ2b1x1_874937_d3YmbYLd/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235937_TTUQ2b1x1_874937_d3YmbYLd/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235937_TTUQ2b1x1_874937_d3YmbYLd/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235937_TTUQ2b1x1_874937_d3YmbYLd/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235937_TTUQ2b1x1_874937_d3YmbYLd/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235937_TTUQ2b1x1_874937_d3YmbYLd/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=1644, passed=42709
Got 42709 stars (including 41010 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 42709 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013038 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010430 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 932 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42414 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42412 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42412 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Excluding outliers - 939 stars left (next iteration limit 1032)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits N_match=939 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.630 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.564 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.754 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.607 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.711 n_q1=200 n_q2=321 n_q3=217 n_q4=201 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.196
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235937_TTUQ2b1x1_874937_d3YmbYLd/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-52-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235937_TTUQ2b1x1_874937_d3YmbYLd/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-52-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235937_TTUQ2b1x1_874937_d3YmbYLd/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Oph-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 17:03:50.65 -10:37:26.4: 13.55 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 16:58:56.05 -11:24:25.4: 13.90 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 16:56:59.42 -08:14:41.2: 14.20 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 17:07:42.89 -09:26:02.0: 13.28 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 17:08:20.26 -05:51:23.4: 13.31 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 17:16:41.30 -07:40:24.7: 14.49 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 16:59:53.33 -11:28:50.7: 13.68 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 17:12:48.24 -08:01:51.5: 13.62 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 16:55:14.78 -06:15:40.3: 12.39 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 17:03:50.65 -10:37:26.4: 13.54 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 16:59:53.33 -11:28:50.7: 13.59 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 17:16:41.30 -07:40:24.7: 14.58 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 17:12:48.24 -08:01:51.5: 13.65 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 17:08:20.26 -05:51:23.4: 13.27 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 17:07:42.89 -09:26:02.0: 13.35 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 16:58:56.05 -11:24:25.4: 14.02 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 16:56:59.42 -08:14:41.2: 14.17 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.53 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.55 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.63 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.63 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.29 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:16:41.30 -07:40:24.7: ref_mag=14.53 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.3768 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:03:50.65 -10:37:26.4: ref_mag=13.55 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.7708 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.31 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.95 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:12:48.24 -08:01:51.5: ref_mag=13.63 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7004 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:59:53.33 -11:28:50.7: ref_mag=13.63 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.9152 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.18 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:08:20.26 -05:51:23.4: ref_mag=13.29 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4959 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:07:42.89 -09:26:02.0: ref_mag=13.31 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5190 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:58:56.05 -11:24:25.4: ref_mag=13.95 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.2561 delta=-0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:56:59.42 -08:14:41.2: ref_mag=14.18 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.1579 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 16:55:14.78 -06:15:40.3: 12.38 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.38 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:55:14.78 -06:15:40.3: ref_mag=12.38 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.7552 delta=-0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 17:19:17.41 -08:37:03.8: 15.52 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 17:23:24.51 -10:31:33.7: 15.44 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 16:52:05.41 -08:52:07.0: 13.35 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 16:47:13.70 -09:00:56.3: 13.39 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 16:55:52.90 -11:56:44.2: 13.90 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 16:52:42.63 -14:00:04.4: 13.44 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 16:44:16.76 -08:18:19.6: 13.76 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 17:19:17.41 -08:37:03.8: 15.52 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 16:52:05.41 -08:52:07.0: 13.30 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 17:23:24.51 -10:31:33.7: 15.44 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 16:47:13.70 -09:00:56.3: 13.29 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.32 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.33 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:52:05.41 -08:52:07.0: ref_mag=13.32 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.2914 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:47:13.70 -09:00:56.3: ref_mag=13.33 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6456 delta=-0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 17:12:45.70 -11:29:19.2: 15.51 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 16:50:21.35 -09:24:16.1: 13.80 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 16:50:20.46 -06:32:21.8: 13.76 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 16:44:16.76 -08:18:19.6: 13.43 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 16:52:42.63 -14:00:04.4: 13.37 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 16:55:52.90 -11:56:44.2: 13.80 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.55 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.41 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.84 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:44:16.76 -08:18:19.6: ref_mag=13.55 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.7079 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:55:52.90 -11:56:44.2: ref_mag=13.84 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.9016 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:52:42.63 -14:00:04.4: ref_mag=13.41 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.4898 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 17:12:45.70 -11:29:19.2: 15.53 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 16:50:21.35 -09:24:16.1: 13.77 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 16:50:20.46 -06:32:21.8: 13.69 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.79 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.72 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:50:21.35 -09:24:16.1: ref_mag=13.79 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.8666 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:50:20.46 -06:32:21.8: ref_mag=13.72 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.8691 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 16:42:52.47 -06:32:42.2: 14.33 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 16:43:26.18 -06:03:37.8: 14.65 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 17:17:08.63 -07:06:11.3: 15.35 +/- 0.35 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 16:42:52.47 -06:32:42.2: 14.17 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.24 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:42:52.47 -06:32:42.2: ref_mag=14.24 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.0692 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 16:42:32.94 -10:10:43.7: 14.84 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 16:42:14.76 -09:20:28.6: 14.34 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 16:48:00.98 -11:41:09.4: 14.61 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 16:43:26.18 -06:03:37.8: 14.43 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.52 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:43:26.18 -06:03:37.8: ref_mag=14.52 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.1519 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 17:17:08.63 -07:06:11.3: 14.95 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.07 +/- 0.19
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 17:17:08.63 -07:06:11.3: ref_mag=15.07 +/- 0.19 new_mean_mag=14.1183 delta=0.95 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 17:12:54.94 -10:36:01.3: 14.02 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 16:42:32.94 -10:10:43.7: 14.75 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 16:42:14.76 -09:20:28.6: 14.23 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 16:48:00.98 -11:41:09.4: 14.42 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.79 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:42:32.94 -10:10:43.7: ref_mag=14.79 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=14.2771 delta=0.51 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.28 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:42:14.76 -09:20:28.6: ref_mag=14.28 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.2086 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.50 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:48:00.98 -11:41:09.4: ref_mag=14.50 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.2685 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 16:48:17.60 -08:26:45.8: 14.58 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 17:12:54.94 -10:36:01.3: 14.07 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.04 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:12:54.94 -10:36:01.3: ref_mag=14.04 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.0590 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 16:56:01.90 -11:05:11.2: 14.58 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 16:48:17.60 -08:26:45.8: 14.33 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.43 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:48:17.60 -08:26:45.8: ref_mag=14.43 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.1855 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 16:48:57.04 -06:41:27.5: 14.76 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 16:41:53.46 -07:10:18.5: 14.35 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 16:40:59.83 -07:53:31.7: 14.65 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 16:56:01.90 -11:05:11.2: 14.74 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.65 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:56:01.90 -11:05:11.2: ref_mag=14.65 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.0243 delta=0.62 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 16:52:00.45 -07:51:33.4: 14.14 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 16:48:57.04 -06:41:27.5: 14.45 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 16:41:53.46 -07:10:18.5: 14.51 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.56 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.42 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 16:40:59.83 -07:53:31.7: 14.63 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:48:57.04 -06:41:27.5: ref_mag=14.56 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.3863 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:41:53.46 -07:10:18.5: ref_mag=14.42 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.2677 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.64 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:40:59.83 -07:53:31.7: ref_mag=14.64 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.4239 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 16:47:33.00 -06:07:58.6: 14.79 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 16:52:00.45 -07:51:33.4: 14.65 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.29 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:52:00.45 -07:51:33.4: ref_mag=14.29 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.3007 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 16:58:30.76 -06:37:46.9: 14.44 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 16:47:33.00 -06:07:58.6: 14.63 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.70 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:47:33.00 -06:07:58.6: ref_mag=14.70 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.3801 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 16:56:34.15 -12:11:12.2: 15.42 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 16:45:41.57 -12:21:01.9: 14.61 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 16:47:57.99 -10:32:30.4: 14.77 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 16:41:19.58 -09:21:05.4: 14.30 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 16:58:30.76 -06:37:46.9: 14.63 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.52 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:58:30.76 -06:37:46.9: ref_mag=14.52 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.3070 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 16:56:34.15 -12:11:12.2: 15.48 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 16:45:41.57 -12:21:01.9: 14.73 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 16:47:57.99 -10:32:30.4: 14.45 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.66 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:45:41.57 -12:21:01.9: ref_mag=14.66 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.3189 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.56 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:47:57.99 -10:32:30.4: ref_mag=14.56 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.3005 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 16:41:19.58 -09:21:05.4: 14.78 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.43 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:41:19.58 -09:21:05.4: ref_mag=14.43 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.3579 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 17:02:27.99 -08:37:21.1: 14.41 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 16:41:32.56 -09:19:25.5: 14.36 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 17:02:27.99 -08:37:21.1: 14.36 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.38 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:02:27.99 -08:37:21.1: ref_mag=14.38 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.2089 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 17:20:09.49 -07:57:28.8: 14.44 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 16:41:32.56 -09:19:25.5: 14.62 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.46 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:41:32.56 -09:19:25.5: ref_mag=14.46 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.4472 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 17:11:19.98 -12:40:08.4: 15.47 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 16:44:03.53 -05:48:01.0: 14.52 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 16:51:07.18 -06:21:16.8: 14.47 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 17:20:09.49 -07:57:28.8: 14.26 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.33 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:20:09.49 -07:57:28.8: ref_mag=14.33 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.2010 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 17:11:19.98 -12:40:08.4: 15.48 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 16:44:03.53 -05:48:01.0: 14.39 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 16:45:19.55 -09:09:56.6: 14.65 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.44 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:44:03.53 -05:48:01.0: ref_mag=14.44 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.4286 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 16:51:07.18 -06:21:16.8: 14.00 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.14 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:51:07.18 -06:21:16.8: ref_mag=14.14 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.2539 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 16:52:46.99 -13:46:54.3: 14.47 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 16:45:19.55 -09:09:56.6: 14.92 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.75 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:45:19.55 -09:09:56.6: ref_mag=14.75 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.5057 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 16:44:35.72 -13:00:14.5: 14.65 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 16:52:46.99 -13:46:54.3: 14.62 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.53 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:52:46.99 -13:46:54.3: ref_mag=14.53 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.3338 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 17:20:55.35 -13:45:34.5: 14.80 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 16:50:10.62 -08:13:42.1: 14.63 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 16:44:35.72 -13:00:14.5: 14.78 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.71 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:44:35.72 -13:00:14.5: ref_mag=14.71 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.2755 delta=0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 17:20:55.35 -13:45:34.5: 14.76 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.77 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:20:55.35 -13:45:34.5: ref_mag=14.77 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.0739 delta=0.70 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 16:50:10.62 -08:13:42.1: 14.59 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.61 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:50:10.62 -08:13:42.1: ref_mag=14.61 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.4162 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 17:13:50.91 -05:55:37.5: 14.78 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 17:03:30.13 -09:28:02.4: 14.27 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 16:51:17.12 -06:42:09.3: 14.58 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 17:13:50.91 -05:55:37.5: 14.69 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.74 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 16:57:47.97 -07:52:11.6: 15.26 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:13:50.91 -05:55:37.5: ref_mag=14.74 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.4149 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 16:49:17.78 -13:41:41.2: 14.74 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 17:03:30.13 -09:28:02.4: 14.58 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.39 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:03:30.13 -09:28:02.4: ref_mag=14.39 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.2420 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 16:51:17.12 -06:42:09.3: 14.57 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.57 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:51:17.12 -06:42:09.3: ref_mag=14.57 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.5578 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 16:56:40.16 -09:07:31.6: 14.74 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 16:57:47.97 -07:52:11.6: 14.87 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 16:49:17.78 -13:41:41.2: 14.54 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.00 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:57:47.97 -07:52:11.6: ref_mag=15.00 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.4805 delta=0.52 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.63 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:49:17.78 -13:41:41.2: ref_mag=14.63 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.2981 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 16:56:40.16 -09:07:31.6: 14.56 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.63 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:56:40.16 -09:07:31.6: ref_mag=14.63 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.4373 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 16:49:39.22 -08:37:59.0: 14.77 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 16:52:41.78 -12:51:08.6: 14.80 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 17:01:19.83 -08:25:20.8: 14.86 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 16:52:44.14 -11:49:16.7: 14.60 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 17:09:20.49 -07:29:17.5: 14.66 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 16:52:41.78 -12:51:08.6: 14.70 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 16:49:39.22 -08:37:59.0: 14.88 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.82 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.75 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:52:41.78 -12:51:08.6: ref_mag=14.75 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.2987 delta=0.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:49:39.22 -08:37:59.0: ref_mag=14.82 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.4848 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 17:01:19.83 -08:25:20.8: 14.65 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 17:01:55.95 -10:34:04.7: 14.87 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.74 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 16:52:44.14 -11:49:16.7: 14.44 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:01:19.83 -08:25:20.8: ref_mag=14.74 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.3030 delta=0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.51 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:52:44.14 -11:49:16.7: ref_mag=14.51 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.5090 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 17:09:20.49 -07:29:17.5: 14.80 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.72 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:09:20.49 -07:29:17.5: ref_mag=14.72 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.3743 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 17:01:55.95 -10:34:04.7: 15.32 +/- 0.30 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 17:12:56.27 -07:06:42.5: 14.43 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 17:25:55.51 -07:45:57.4: 14.33 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.01 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:01:55.95 -10:34:04.7: ref_mag=15.01 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=14.3754 delta=0.63 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 17:25:55.51 -07:45:57.4: 14.31 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.32 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:25:55.51 -07:45:57.4: ref_mag=14.32 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.4038 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 17:12:56.27 -07:06:42.5: 14.51 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.47 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:12:56.27 -07:06:42.5: ref_mag=14.47 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.4588 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out72349.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out72475.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out72052.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out72149.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out72250.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out72442.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 8s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71928_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172
The candidate 71928_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71936_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172
The candidate 71936_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71947_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172
The candidate 71947_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71948_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172
The candidate 71948_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71954_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172
The candidate 71954_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:54:20.86 -06:19:21.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71961_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172
The candidate 71961_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71968_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172
The candidate 71968_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71970_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172
The candidate 71970_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71971_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172
The candidate 71971_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:41:51.35 -11:33:16.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71976_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172
The candidate 71976_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71980_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172
The candidate 71980_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71989_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172
The candidate 71989_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:20:51.05 -12:50:07.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72013_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172
The candidate 72013_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:55:23.23 -08:50:50.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72052_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172
Preparing report for the candidate 72052_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72071_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172
The candidate 72071_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:14:11.80 -08:24:07.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72105_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172
The candidate 72105_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:19:09.51 -12:29:03.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72120_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172
The candidate 72120_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72144_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172
The candidate 72144_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:45:00.78 -07:07:08.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72146_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172
The candidate 72146_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:19:38.50 -14:09:49.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72149_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172
Preparing report for the candidate 72149_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72163_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172
The candidate 72163_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:53:43.24 -10:14:56.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72187_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172
The candidate 72187_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72190_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172
The candidate 72190_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:07:29.50 -12:43:41.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72203_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172
The candidate 72203_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72204_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172
The candidate 72204_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72222_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172
The candidate 72222_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:54:44.60 -11:48:22.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72240_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172
The candidate 72240_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:00:33.15 -12:16:11.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72246_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172
The candidate 72246_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72250_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172
Preparing report for the candidate 72250_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72252_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172
The candidate 72252_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72255_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172
The candidate 72255_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72263_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172
The candidate 72263_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:48:21.92 -14:10:41.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72294_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172
The candidate 72294_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72300_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172
The candidate 72300_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:06:42.64 -07:11:30.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72323_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172
The candidate 72323_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72335_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172
The candidate 72335_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:17:23.08 -14:00:07.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72349_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172
The candidate 72349_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:17:08.63 -07:06:11.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.15, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.13)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.882 4360415523784233088 259.28597684185 -07.10338324223 13.1546 11.7149 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.882#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72350_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172
The candidate 72350_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:48:09.85 -14:14:08.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72367_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172
The candidate 72367_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72379_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172
The candidate 72379_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72384_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172
The candidate 72384_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72385_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172
The candidate 72385_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72395_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172
The candidate 72395_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72397_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172
The candidate 72397_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72411_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172
The candidate 72411_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72414_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172
The candidate 72414_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72422_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172
The candidate 72422_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72435_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172
The candidate 72435_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72436_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172
The candidate 72436_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72437_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172
The candidate 72437_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72439_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172
The candidate 72439_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72442_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172
Preparing report for the candidate 72442_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72448_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172
The candidate 72448_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72449_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172
The candidate 72449_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72451_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172
The candidate 72451_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72453_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172
The candidate 72453_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72468_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172
The candidate 72468_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72473_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172
The candidate 72473_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72475_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172
The candidate 72475_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:11:19.98 -12:40:08.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.10, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.08)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 4.702 4142234689842073216 257.83366829555 -12.66775919232 13.5387 11.7275 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#4.702#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72484_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172
The candidate 72484_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72485_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172
The candidate 72485_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72486_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172
The candidate 72486_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72487_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172
The candidate 72487_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72488_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172
The candidate 72488_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72503_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172
The candidate 72503_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72530_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172
The candidate 72530_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:09:04.50 -13:45:02.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72536_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172
The candidate 72536_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72540_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172
The candidate 72540_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72543_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172
The candidate 72543_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72551_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172
The candidate 72551_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72558_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172
The candidate 72558_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72560_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172
The candidate 72560_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72562_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172
The candidate 72562_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72585_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172
The candidate 72585_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72593_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172
The candidate 72593_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72595_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172
The candidate 72595_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72611_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172
The candidate 72611_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72613_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172
The candidate 72613_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72627_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172
The candidate 72627_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72634_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172
The candidate 72634_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 48016_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172
The candidate 48016_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:06:03.31 -07:07:03.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36254_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172
The candidate 36254_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:16:09.38 -09:32:23.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 29697_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172
The candidate 29697_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:07:25.71 -10:50:56.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 15698_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172
The candidate 15698_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:23:06.29 -12:51:41.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26061_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172
The candidate 26061_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:06:30.33 -11:28:39.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68692_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172
The candidate 68692_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:24:13.53 -11:50:46.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56133_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172
The candidate 56133_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:14:04.75 -08:16:33.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31293_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172
The candidate 31293_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0172 did not pass the final checks
