This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_235549_TTUQ1b1x1_60341_yuIGPnve
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 11.2045 2461171.7045 11.53 10:18:08.41 +14:50:31.7
224.05130 52.34599 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 8.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.11 Parthenope -2 1 3 11.7 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 10:18:08.41 +14:50:31.7: 15.75 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 10:18:08.41 +14:50:31.7: 15.76 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 11.2044* 10 18 08.41 +14 50 31.7 11.5 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461171.7045,11.53,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260511.2045 11.53CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 11.2045 2461171.7045 14.00 10:10:12.08 +16:27:09.3
220.40791 51.26329 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 8.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.161 Athor -2 1 3 14.3 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 10:10:12.08 +16:27:09.3: 15.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 10:10:12.08 +16:27:09.3: 15.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 11.2044* 10 10 12.08 +16 27 09.3 14.0 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461171.7045,14.00,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260511.2045 14.00CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 11.2045 2461171.7045 13.88 10:58:28.37 +10:34:46.0
239.38893 58.69755 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.1" and 8.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.140 Siwa -1 0 1 13.7 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 10:58:28.37 +10:34:46.0: 16.01 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 10:58:28.37 +10:34:46.0: 15.87 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 11.2044* 10 58 28.37 +10 34 46.0 13.9 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461171.7045,13.88,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260511.2045 13.88CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 11.2045 2461171.7045 14.20 11:01:06.38 +08:56:51.2
242.62479 58.22840 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.5" and 8.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.90 Antiope -1 0 1 14.3 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 11:01:06.38 +08:56:51.2: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 11:01:06.38 +08:56:51.2: 15.74 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 11.2044* 11 01 06.38 +08 56 51.2 14.2 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461171.7045,14.20,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260511.2045 14.20CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 11.2045 2461171.7045 14.39 10:17:41.95 +09:56:38.8
230.86259 49.94368 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 8.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.808 Merxia -2 1 3 14.9 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 10:17:41.95 +09:56:38.8: 15.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 10:17:41.95 +09:56:38.8: 15.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 11.2044* 10 17 41.95 +09 56 38.8 14.4 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461171.7045,14.39,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260511.2045 14.39CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461120.72857596 21.03.2026 05:28:58.963 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
First image: 2461120.72857596 21.03.2026 05:28:58.963 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
Last image: 2461171.70484546 11.05.2026 04:54:48.648 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_235549_TTUQ1b1x1_60341_yuIGPnve/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 1
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.60
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 6264
Objects passed selection criteria: 6261
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 5978.25
Average stars matched: 5836.5 (97.6289 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 112212 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun May 10 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-44-gd532a530
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-10)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun May 10 23:56:47 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461120.72857596 21.03.2026 05:28:58.963 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
First image: 2461120.72857596 21.03.2026 05:28:58.963 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
Last image: 2461171.70484546 11.05.2026 04:54:48.648 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_235549_TTUQ1b1x1_60341_yuIGPnve/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 94
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.37
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 12 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 32177
Objects passed selection criteria: 32092
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 30708.2
Average stars matched: 29362 (95.616 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 133600 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun May 10 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-44-gd532a530
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-10)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun May 10 23:58:17 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_235549_TTUQ1b1x1_60341_yuIGPnve/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0126.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_235549_TTUQ1b1x1_60341_yuIGPnve/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_235549_TTUQ1b1x1_60341_yuIGPnve/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0126.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_235549_TTUQ1b1x1_60341_yuIGPnve/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461171.70405789
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_235549_TTUQ1b1x1_60341_yuIGPnve/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_235549_TTUQ1b1x1_60341_yuIGPnve/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127.fits
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_235549_TTUQ1b1x1_60341_yuIGPnve/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0126.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_235549_TTUQ1b1x1_60341_yuIGPnve/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0126.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_235549_TTUQ1b1x1_60341_yuIGPnve/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127.fits
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_235549_TTUQ1b1x1_60341_yuIGPnve/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0126.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_235549_TTUQ1b1x1_60341_yuIGPnve/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_235549_TTUQ1b1x1_60341_yuIGPnve/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0126.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_235549_TTUQ1b1x1_60341_yuIGPnve/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0126.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0126.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_235549_TTUQ1b1x1_60341_yuIGPnve/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0126.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
The guess is 605 arcmin.
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_235549_TTUQ1b1x1_60341_yuIGPnve/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_235549_TTUQ1b1x1_60341_yuIGPnve/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
The guess is 605 arcmin.
No image with WCS calibration found for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_235549_TTUQ1b1x1_60341_yuIGPnve/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127.fits .... Determining astrometry method...
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net software...
Choosing aperture...
Using the catalog image00004.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_235549_TTUQ1b1x1_60341_yuIGPnve/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
No image with WCS calibration found for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_235549_TTUQ1b1x1_60341_yuIGPnve/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0126.fits .... Determining astrometry method...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_235549_TTUQ1b1x1_60341_yuIGPnve/lib/make_outxyls_for_astrometric_calibration found 5288 high-SNR stars for plate solving
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net software...
Choosing aperture...
Using the catalog image00003.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_235549_TTUQ1b1x1_60341_yuIGPnve/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0126.fits
The guess is 570 arcmin.
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
This service uses tools provided by Astrometry.net.
For more information visit http://astrometry.net/
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits'
######### Trying to solve plate assuming 605' field of view #########
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_235549_TTUQ1b1x1_60341_yuIGPnve/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127.fits
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net code
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits was not found.
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
The guess is 570 arcmin.
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_235549_TTUQ1b1x1_60341_yuIGPnve/lib/make_outxyls_for_astrometric_calibration found 5341 high-SNR stars for plate solving
IMAGE_SIZE= --width 9576 --height 6388 SCALE_LOW=544.5 SCALE_HIGH=3025.0
Using solve-field binary
/usr/local/astrometry/bin/solve-field
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out65150.xyls"...
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
This service uses tools provided by Astrometry.net.
For more information visit http://astrometry.net/
verification OK: wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits
verification OK: wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits
######### Trying to solve plate assuming 605' field of view #########
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_235549_TTUQ1b1x1_60341_yuIGPnve/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0126.fits
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net code
IMAGE_SIZE= --width 9576 --height 6388 SCALE_LOW=544.5 SCALE_HIGH=3025.0
Using solve-field binary
/usr/local/astrometry/bin/solve-field
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out65146.xyls"...
Generating wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.cat from image00001.cat
Generating wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits.cat from image00002.cat
Catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
Catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits
verification OK: wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
verification OK: wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:39:50.454 +14:01:49.13 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
Image size: 937.3'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:40:03.799 +13:58:58.11 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 6682 stars ###
### Converted positions of 6275 stars ###
'wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
'wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_235549_TTUQ1b1x1_60341_yuIGPnve/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky65781.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_235549_TTUQ1b1x1_60341_yuIGPnve/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky65809.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits
Reading file "./out65150.axy"...
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4119.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4118.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4117.fits, field objects 1-10).
log-odds ratio 60.2998 (1.5412e+26), 10 match, 0 conflict, 36 distractors, 22 index.
RA,Dec = (159.974,14.0418), pixel scale 5.97431 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ----++-+-+---+-------+--+--+-----+-----------+(best)------------------------------------------------------
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Field 1: solved with index index-4116.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out65150.solved to indicate this.
Reading file "./out65146.axy"...
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4119.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field: out65150.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (159.970632, 14.044415) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (10:39:52.952, +14:02:39.892).
Field size: 15.796 x 10.5804 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -176.459 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Inserting WCS header... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_235549_TTUQ1b1x1_60341_yuIGPnve/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127.fits' -> 'fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127.fits'
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4118.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4117.fits, field objects 1-10).
log-odds ratio 59.3652 (6.05311e+25), 10 match, 0 conflict, 36 distractors, 22 index.
RA,Dec = (159.983,14.0525), pixel scale 5.97416 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ----++-+-+---+-------+---+--+----+-----------+(best)------------------------------------------------------
WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M May 10 23:56 fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K May 10 23:56 out65150.wcs
Inserting WCS header (1st iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127.fits)... done!
Field 1: solved with index index-4116.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out65146.solved to indicate this.
Field: out65146.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (159.979998, 14.055095) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (10:39:55.200, +14:03:18.341).
Field size: 15.7958 x 10.5803 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -176.459 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Inserting WCS header... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_235549_TTUQ1b1x1_60341_yuIGPnve/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0126.fits' -> 'fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0126.fits'
WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M May 10 23:56 fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0126.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K May 10 23:56 out65146.wcs
Inserting WCS header (1st iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0126.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0126.fits)... done!
done!
done!
All done!
done
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_235549_TTUQ1b1x1_60341_yuIGPnve/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127.fits (fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127.fits)
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration01' / astrometry.net run
All done!
done
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_235549_TTUQ1b1x1_60341_yuIGPnve/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0126.fits (fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0126.fits)
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration01' / astrometry.net run
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out65150.xyls"...
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out65146.xyls"...
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading file "./out65150.axy"...
Only searching for solutions within 15.715 degrees of RA,Dec (159.97,14.0436)
log-odds ratio 60.2998 (1.5412e+26), 10 match, 0 conflict, 36 distractors, 22 index.
RA,Dec = (159.974,14.0418), pixel scale 5.97431 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ----++-+-+---+-------+--+--+-----+-----------+(best)------------------------------------------------------
Reading file "./out65146.axy"...
Only searching for solutions within 15.715 degrees of RA,Dec (159.979,14.0543)
log-odds ratio 59.3652 (6.05311e+25), 10 match, 0 conflict, 36 distractors, 22 index.
RA,Dec = (159.983,14.0525), pixel scale 5.97416 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ----++-+-+---+-------+---+--+----+-----------+(best)------------------------------------------------------
Field 1: solved with index index-4116.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out65150.solved to indicate this.
Field: out65150.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (159.971344, 14.043183) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (10:39:53.123, +14:02:35.458).
Field size: 15.7753 x 10.5803 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -176.467 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Field 1: solved with index index-4116.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out65146.solved to indicate this.
Field: out65146.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (159.980741, 14.053877) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (10:39:55.378, +14:03:13.958).
Field size: 15.7753 x 10.5802 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -176.467 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M May 10 23:56 fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K May 10 23:56 out65150.wcs
Inserting WCS header (2nd iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127.fits)... done!
WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M May 10 23:56 fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0126.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K May 10 23:56 out65146.wcs
Inserting WCS header (2nd iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0126.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0126.fits)... done!
done!
done!
All done!
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors.
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration02' / astrometry.net run
The field of view is large: we'll try to run Astromety.net code on the image itself rather than a star list
Reading input file "wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127.fits"...
Found an existing WCS header, will try to verify it.
Extracting sources...
All done!
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors.
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration02' / astrometry.net run
The field of view is large: we'll try to run Astromety.net code on the image itself rather than a star list
Reading input file "wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0126.fits"...
Found an existing WCS header, will try to verify it.
Extracting sources...
simplexy: found 23520 sources.
simplexy: found 23805 sources.
Solving...
Reading file "./wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0126.axy"...
Verifying WCS using indices with quads of size [63.742, 955.531] arcmin
Solving...
Verifying WCS with index 39 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4117.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 0
Verifying WCS with index 40 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4116.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 124.59 (1.28509e+54), 21 match, 0 conflict, 303 distractors, 22 index.
RA,Dec = (159.982,14.0547), pixel scale 5.98704 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ----------+----+-------+--------------------+------+--------------+--+-+----------------------------
Reading file "./wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127.axy"...
Verifying WCS using indices with quads of size [63.743, 955.546] arcmin
Verifying WCS with index 39 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4117.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 22.0404 (3.73263e+09), 12 match, 0 conflict, 285 distractors, 12 index.
RA,Dec = (159.972,14.044), pixel scale 5.98713 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -----------------------+---+--------------+-+--+----------------------------------------------------
--> log-odds 124.59
Verifying WCS with index 41 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4115.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 474.697 (1.44018e+206), 51 match, 0 conflict, 273 distractors, 52 index.
RA,Dec = (159.982,14.0547), pixel scale 5.98704 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -+----+---++---+-------+-------+--+---+---+-+-----++---------+-+--+--+-+-+--------+------+--+-------
--> log-odds 22.0404
Verifying WCS with index 40 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4116.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 143.727 (2.63041e+62), 22 match, 0 conflict, 278 distractors, 22 index.
RA,Dec = (159.972,14.044), pixel scale 5.98713 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ---------------+-------+---+-----+--------+-+--+-----------+------------------+---------------------
--> log-odds 474.697
Verifying WCS with index 42 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4114.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 930.914 (inf), 96 match, 0 conflict, 307 distractors, 97 index.
RA,Dec = (159.982,14.0547), pixel scale 5.98704 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -+-++-+---++--++--++---+--+----+--+---+---+++-++--++-------+-+-++-+--+-+++--+-----++--+--+--+-------
--> log-odds 143.727
Verifying WCS with index 41 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4115.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 487.785 (6.95307e+211), 52 match, 0 conflict, 254 distractors, 52 index.
RA,Dec = (159.972,14.044), pixel scale 5.98713 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -+++-----------+---+---+--++---+-+-----+-++-+--+--------+-++-----------+----+-+--------+-----+----+-
--> log-odds 930.914
Verifying WCS with index 43 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4113.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 487.785
Verifying WCS with index 42 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4114.fits)
log-odds ratio 1881.28 (inf), 195 match, 0 conflict, 256 distractors, 197 index.
RA,Dec = (159.982,14.0547), pixel scale 5.98704 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++++++-++++-+++-+++++-+++++-+-+-++-+-++-++++-++-+++-+---+++++-+++++++++++++++-+++++++++++++++++--++
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 939.443 (inf), 97 match, 0 conflict, 328 distractors, 97 index.
RA,Dec = (159.972,14.044), pixel scale 5.98713 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -+++--+-----++-+---+++-+--++---+-+-----++++++--+--------+-++----+--+++-+----+-+----+---+-++-++----++
--> log-odds 939.443
Verifying WCS with index 43 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4113.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 1883.71 (inf), 196 match, 0 conflict, 285 distractors, 197 index.
RA,Dec = (159.972,14.044), pixel scale 5.98713 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++++-+-+-++-+++++-+++-+++++++++-+-++--+++++++++-+++--+-+-++---+++++++-+-+++++++++++++++-++++++--+++
--> log-odds 1881.28
Verifying WCS with index 44 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4112.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 3447.84 (inf), 379 match, 0 conflict, 475 distractors, 382 index.
RA,Dec = (159.982,14.0547), pixel scale 5.98704 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-++-++++++++++++++++-+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
--> log-odds 1883.71
Verifying WCS with index 44 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4112.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 3444.11 (inf), 380 match, 0 conflict, 368 distractors, 382 index.
RA,Dec = (159.972,14.044), pixel scale 5.98713 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-++++-++++++-+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-+++
--> log-odds 3447.84
Verifying WCS with index 45 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4111.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 6107.3 (inf), 727 match, 0 conflict, 764 distractors, 734 index.
RA,Dec = (159.982,14.0547), pixel scale 5.98704 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
--> log-odds 3444.11
Verifying WCS with index 45 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4111.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 6076.82 (inf), 726 match, 1 conflict, 831 distractors, 734 index.
RA,Dec = (159.972,14.044), pixel scale 5.98713 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
--> log-odds 6107.3
Verifying WCS with index 46 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4110.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 11043.8 (inf), 1441 match, 0 conflict, 2098 distractors, 1461 index.
RA,Dec = (159.982,14.0547), pixel scale 5.98704 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
--> log-odds 6076.82
Verifying WCS with index 46 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4110.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 10979.6 (inf), 1441 match, 0 conflict, 2696 distractors, 1461 index.
RA,Dec = (159.972,14.044), pixel scale 5.98713 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
--> log-odds 11043.8
Got 7 solutions.
Field: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0126.fits
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (159.980422, 14.054119) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (10:39:55.301, +14:03:14.829).
Field size: 15.7748 x 10.5754 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -176.458 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Creating new FITS file "./wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0126.new"...
--> log-odds 10979.6
Got 8 solutions.
renamed 'wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0126.new' -> 'wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0126.fits'
Field: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127.fits
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (159.971014, 14.043428) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (10:39:53.043, +14:02:36.341).
Field size: 15.7748 x 10.5754 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -176.458 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Creating new FITS file "./wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127.new"...
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0126.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0126.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0126.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0126.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_235549_TTUQ1b1x1_60341_yuIGPnve/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0126.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0126.fits
Generating wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0126.fits.cat from image00003.cat
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0126.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0126.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0126.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0126.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:39:55.083 +14:03:12.03 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
renamed 'wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127.new' -> 'wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127.fits'
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_235549_TTUQ1b1x1_60341_yuIGPnve/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127.fits
### Converted positions of 5583 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0126.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_235549_TTUQ1b1x1_60341_yuIGPnve/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky124910.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0126.fits
Generating wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127.fits.cat from image00004.cat
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:39:52.825 +14:02:33.54 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 5519 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_235549_TTUQ1b1x1_60341_yuIGPnve/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky125040.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127.fits
wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits'
wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits'
wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0126.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0126.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0126.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0126.fits'
wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:39:50.454 +14:01:49.13 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0126.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0126.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:39:55.083 +14:03:12.03 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:39:50.454 +14:01:49.13
Second-epoch image center 10:39:55.083 +14:03:12.03
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0297 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:39:52.825 +14:02:33.54 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:39:50.454 +14:01:49.13
Second-epoch image center 10:39:52.825 +14:02:33.54
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0156 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
ref2=wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
new1=wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0126.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
new2=wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
reference average sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
INFO: WCS quality sigma_overall_arcsec not available for comparison (1st new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality sigma_overall_arcsec not available for comparison (2nd new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio not available for comparison (1st new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio not available for comparison (2nd new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 10:39:55.083 +14:03:12.03
Second-epoch second image center 10:39:52.825 +14:02:33.54
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01406 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits &> /tmp/tmp.L6uhR8Mu1j
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits &> /tmp/tmp.guIcCzfuLc
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_235549_TTUQ1b1x1_60341_yuIGPnve/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0126.fits &> /tmp/tmp.G1irHvLOoE
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_235549_TTUQ1b1x1_60341_yuIGPnve/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0126.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_235549_TTUQ1b1x1_60341_yuIGPnve/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127.fits &> /tmp/tmp.TiygvCBnEx
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_235549_TTUQ1b1x1_60341_yuIGPnve/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits and wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits and wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits and wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits) and catalog (wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 6682 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 151.7675 to 168.2412 deg, Dec +8.6439 to +19.2936 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 151.7675 to 168.2412 deg, Dec 8.6439 to 19.2936 deg
Loaded 4244 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3452 out of 3573 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3573 out of 6682 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.924550
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.924550
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.60
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.32
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.32
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 6682 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 151.7675 to 168.2412 deg, Dec +8.6439 to +19.2936 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 151.7675 to 168.2412 deg, Dec 8.6439 to 19.2936 deg
Loaded 4244 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3452 out of 3573 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3573 out of 6682 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits (aperture=6.6)
Read 6275 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 151.6959 to 168.1623 deg, Dec +8.5198 to +19.2643 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 151.6959 to 168.1623 deg, Dec 8.5198 to 19.2643 deg
Loaded 4298 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3432 out of 3542 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3542 out of 6275 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits (aperture=6.7)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 1 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.4 pix Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
2.5 pix Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits
2.6 pix fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0126.fits
2.6 pix fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127.fits
2.4 pix wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
2.5 pix wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
15.2 mag. Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0126.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.0 (SNR ) 12.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.L6uhR8Mu1j (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_235549_TTUQ1b1x1_60341_yuIGPnve/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=396, passed=6682
Got 6682 stars (including 6282 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6682 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 870 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 870 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 854 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 870 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6520 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 870 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 870 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6518 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 870 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6518 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 870 stars left (next iteration limit 957)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits N_match=870 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.352 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.282 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.434 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.337 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.353 n_q1=206 n_q2=258 n_q3=195 n_q4=211 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.232
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits -region wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.guIcCzfuLc (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_235549_TTUQ1b1x1_60341_yuIGPnve/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=378, passed=6275
Got 6275 stars (including 5894 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6275 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 864 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 864 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 850 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 864 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6135 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 864 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 864 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6139 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 864 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6139 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Excluding outliers - 864 stars left (next iteration limit 950)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits N_match=864 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.450 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.384 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.487 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.441 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.492 n_q1=199 n_q2=224 n_q3=235 n_q4=206 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.095
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits -region wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.G1irHvLOoE (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_235549_TTUQ1b1x1_60341_yuIGPnve/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_235549_TTUQ1b1x1_60341_yuIGPnve/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0126.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_235549_TTUQ1b1x1_60341_yuIGPnve/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0126.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_235549_TTUQ1b1x1_60341_yuIGPnve/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0126.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_235549_TTUQ1b1x1_60341_yuIGPnve/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0126.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_235549_TTUQ1b1x1_60341_yuIGPnve/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0126.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_235549_TTUQ1b1x1_60341_yuIGPnve/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0126.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0126.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0126.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0126.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0126.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0126.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0126.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0126.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_235549_TTUQ1b1x1_60341_yuIGPnve/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0126.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0126.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=349, passed=5583
Got 5583 stars (including 5228 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0126.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5583 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.3 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 876 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 876 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 868 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 876 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5455 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.3 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 876 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 876 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5456 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 876 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5456 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 876 stars left (next iteration limit 963)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0126.fits N_match=876 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.354 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.372 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.375 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.298 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.355 n_q1=232 n_q2=196 n_q3=252 n_q4=196 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.059
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0126.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0126.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_235549_TTUQ1b1x1_60341_yuIGPnve/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0126.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0126.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0126.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.TiygvCBnEx (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_235549_TTUQ1b1x1_60341_yuIGPnve/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_235549_TTUQ1b1x1_60341_yuIGPnve/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_235549_TTUQ1b1x1_60341_yuIGPnve/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_235549_TTUQ1b1x1_60341_yuIGPnve/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_235549_TTUQ1b1x1_60341_yuIGPnve/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_235549_TTUQ1b1x1_60341_yuIGPnve/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_235549_TTUQ1b1x1_60341_yuIGPnve/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_235549_TTUQ1b1x1_60341_yuIGPnve/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=367, passed=5519
Got 5519 stars (including 5144 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5519 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.3 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 877 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 877 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 868 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 877 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5386 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.3 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 877 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 877 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5385 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 877 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5385 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 877 stars left (next iteration limit 964)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127.fits N_match=877 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.397 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.373 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.442 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.337 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.405 n_q1=233 n_q2=197 n_q3=251 n_q4=196 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.112
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_235549_TTUQ1b1x1_60341_yuIGPnve/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0126.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0126.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_235549_TTUQ1b1x1_60341_yuIGPnve/wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0126.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_235549_TTUQ1b1x1_60341_yuIGPnve/wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Leo-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 10:18:08.41 +14:50:31.7: 15.75 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 10:18:08.41 +14:50:31.7: 15.76 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20431.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 6s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20431_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127
Preparing report for the candidate 20431_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 7s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Leo-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
10:18:08.41 +14:50:31.7
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_235549_TTUQ1b1x1_60341_yuIGPnve/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0126.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_235549_TTUQ1b1x1_60341_yuIGPnve/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_235549_TTUQ1b1x1_60341_yuIGPnve/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0126.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_235549_TTUQ1b1x1_60341_yuIGPnve/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0126.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_235549_TTUQ1b1x1_60341_yuIGPnve/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0126.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_235549_TTUQ1b1x1_60341_yuIGPnve/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0126.fits
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_235549_TTUQ1b1x1_60341_yuIGPnve/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_235549_TTUQ1b1x1_60341_yuIGPnve/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_235549_TTUQ1b1x1_60341_yuIGPnve/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0126.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_235549_TTUQ1b1x1_60341_yuIGPnve/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127.fits
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_235549_TTUQ1b1x1_60341_yuIGPnve/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_235549_TTUQ1b1x1_60341_yuIGPnve/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0126.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_235549_TTUQ1b1x1_60341_yuIGPnve/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_235549_TTUQ1b1x1_60341_yuIGPnve/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_235549_TTUQ1b1x1_60341_yuIGPnve/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0126.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0126.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_235549_TTUQ1b1x1_60341_yuIGPnve/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0126.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
The guess is 605 arcmin.
The guess is 605 arcmin.
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0126.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0126.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0126.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0126.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0126.fits was not found.
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_235549_TTUQ1b1x1_60341_yuIGPnve/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0126.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_235549_TTUQ1b1x1_60341_yuIGPnve/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0126.fits
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
The guess is 570 arcmin.
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
The guess is 570 arcmin.
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits was not found.
verification OK: wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
verification OK: wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
Generating wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127.fits.cat from image00004.cat
Generating wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0126.fits.cat from image00003.cat
Generating wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.cat from image00001.cat
Generating wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits.cat from image00002.cat
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127.fits
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0126.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0126.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0126.fits
Catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
Catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127.fits
verification OK: wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits
verification OK: wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0126.fits
verification OK: wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:39:50.454 +14:01:49.13 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
Image size: 941.5'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:39:52.825 +14:02:33.54 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
Image size: 941.5'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:39:55.083 +14:03:12.03 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
Image size: 937.3'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:40:03.799 +13:58:58.11 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 32385 stars ###
### Converted positions of 30001 stars ###
### Converted positions of 29906 stars ###
'wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_235549_TTUQ1b1x1_60341_yuIGPnve/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky150389.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
### Converted positions of 31779 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0126.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_235549_TTUQ1b1x1_60341_yuIGPnve/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky150326.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127.fits
'wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_235549_TTUQ1b1x1_60341_yuIGPnve/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky150356.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0126.fits
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_235549_TTUQ1b1x1_60341_yuIGPnve/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky150424.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits
wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0126.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:39:50.454 +14:01:49.13 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0126.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0126.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:39:55.083 +14:03:12.03 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:39:50.454 +14:01:49.13
Second-epoch image center 10:39:55.083 +14:03:12.03
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0297 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:39:52.825 +14:02:33.54 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:39:50.454 +14:01:49.13
Second-epoch image center 10:39:52.825 +14:02:33.54
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0156 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
ref2=wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
new1=wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0126.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
new2=wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
reference average sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
INFO: WCS quality sigma_overall_arcsec not available for comparison (1st new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality sigma_overall_arcsec not available for comparison (2nd new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio not available for comparison (1st new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio not available for comparison (2nd new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 10:39:55.083 +14:03:12.03
Second-epoch second image center 10:39:52.825 +14:02:33.54
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01406 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits &> /tmp/tmp.JiSxZqXOjs
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits &> /tmp/tmp.b38R4Cy8V2
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_235549_TTUQ1b1x1_60341_yuIGPnve/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0126.fits &> /tmp/tmp.1yodl1aqNG
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_235549_TTUQ1b1x1_60341_yuIGPnve/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0126.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_235549_TTUQ1b1x1_60341_yuIGPnve/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127.fits &> /tmp/tmp.nqNwPiBfdT
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_235549_TTUQ1b1x1_60341_yuIGPnve/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits and wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits and wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits and wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits) and catalog (wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 32385 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 151.7675 to 168.2695 deg, Dec +8.6169 to +19.3027 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 151.7675 to 168.2695 deg, Dec 8.6169 to 19.3027 deg
Loaded 4269 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3332 out of 3598 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3598 out of 32385 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.824350
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.824350
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.37
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.45
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.45
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 32385 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 151.7675 to 168.2695 deg, Dec +8.6169 to +19.3027 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 151.7675 to 168.2695 deg, Dec 8.6169 to 19.3027 deg
Loaded 4269 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3332 out of 3598 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3598 out of 32385 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits (aperture=5.3)
Read 31779 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 151.6728 to 168.1777 deg, Dec +8.5198 to +19.2712 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 151.6728 to 168.1777 deg, Dec 8.5198 to 19.2712 deg
Loaded 4310 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3341 out of 3603 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3603 out of 31779 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits (aperture=5.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 80 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
2.2 pix Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits
2.3 pix fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0126.fits
2.2 pix fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
15.4 mag. Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits
15.2 mag. fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0126.fits
15.2 mag. fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.2 (SNR ) 14.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.JiSxZqXOjs (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_235549_TTUQ1b1x1_60341_yuIGPnve/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=18, blended=1352, passed=32367
Got 32367 stars (including 30972 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 32367 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 874 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 874 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 866 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 874 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31787 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 874 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 874 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31784 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 874 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31784 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 874 stars left (next iteration limit 961)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits N_match=874 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.358 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.288 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.431 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.362 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.346 n_q1=204 n_q2=264 n_q3=191 n_q4=215 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.204
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits -region wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.b38R4Cy8V2 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_235549_TTUQ1b1x1_60341_yuIGPnve/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=21, blended=1252, passed=31758
Got 31758 stars (including 30468 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 31758 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 865 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 865 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 854 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 865 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31225 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 865 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 865 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31223 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 865 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31223 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 865 stars left (next iteration limit 951)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits N_match=865 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.455 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.393 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.472 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.454 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.464 n_q1=198 n_q2=235 n_q3=225 n_q4=207 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.036
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits -region wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.1yodl1aqNG (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_235549_TTUQ1b1x1_60341_yuIGPnve/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_235549_TTUQ1b1x1_60341_yuIGPnve/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0126.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_235549_TTUQ1b1x1_60341_yuIGPnve/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0126.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_235549_TTUQ1b1x1_60341_yuIGPnve/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0126.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_235549_TTUQ1b1x1_60341_yuIGPnve/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0126.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_235549_TTUQ1b1x1_60341_yuIGPnve/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0126.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_235549_TTUQ1b1x1_60341_yuIGPnve/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0126.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0126.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0126.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0126.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0126.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0126.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0126.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0126.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_235549_TTUQ1b1x1_60341_yuIGPnve/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0126.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0126.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=1278, passed=29893
Got 29893 stars (including 28567 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0126.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 29893 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 550 (Dec 8.2 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 878 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 878 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 864 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 878 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29209 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 550 (Dec 8.2 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 878 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 878 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29212 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 878 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29212 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 878 stars left (next iteration limit 965)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0126.fits N_match=878 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.329 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.347 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.352 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.279 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.308 n_q1=238 n_q2=202 n_q3=246 n_q4=192 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.068
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0126.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0126.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_235549_TTUQ1b1x1_60341_yuIGPnve/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0126.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0126.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0126.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.nqNwPiBfdT (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_235549_TTUQ1b1x1_60341_yuIGPnve/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_235549_TTUQ1b1x1_60341_yuIGPnve/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_235549_TTUQ1b1x1_60341_yuIGPnve/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_235549_TTUQ1b1x1_60341_yuIGPnve/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_235549_TTUQ1b1x1_60341_yuIGPnve/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_235549_TTUQ1b1x1_60341_yuIGPnve/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_235549_TTUQ1b1x1_60341_yuIGPnve/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_235549_TTUQ1b1x1_60341_yuIGPnve/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=36, blended=1243, passed=29965
Got 29965 stars (including 28682 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 29965 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 550 (Dec 8.2 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 880 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 870 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29242 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 550 (Dec 8.2 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 880 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29241 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29240 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 880 stars left (next iteration limit 968)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127.fits N_match=880 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.381 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.377 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.410 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.320 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.408 n_q1=236 n_q2=202 n_q3=245 n_q4=197 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.075
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_235549_TTUQ1b1x1_60341_yuIGPnve/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0126.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_235549_TTUQ1b1x1_60341_yuIGPnve/wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-53-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0126.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_235549_TTUQ1b1x1_60341_yuIGPnve/wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Leo-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 10:12:30.46 +17:24:39.0: 13.47 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 10:58:28.37 +10:34:46.0: 16.01 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 10:14:52.67 +12:53:53.6: 14.19 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 11:06:44.25 +17:42:00.7: 12.26 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 10:10:12.08 +16:27:09.3: 15.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 11:08:43.65 +08:48:17.6: 14.10 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 11:01:06.38 +08:56:51.2: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 11:04:41.28 +08:47:18.1: 14.56 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 11:09:23.46 +08:39:31.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 11:09:25.90 +08:47:12.9: 14.65 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 11:09:23.46 +08:39:31.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:09:23.46 +08:39:31.7: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 11:09:25.90 +08:47:12.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:09:25.90 +08:47:12.9: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 10:12:30.46 +17:24:39.0: 13.53 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.50 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:12:30.46 +17:24:39.0: ref_mag=13.50 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5860 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 10:58:28.37 +10:34:46.0: 15.87 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 10:10:12.08 +16:27:09.3: 15.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 11:08:43.65 +08:48:17.6: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:08:43.65 +08:48:17.6: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 11:06:44.25 +17:42:00.7: 12.30 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 11:01:06.38 +08:56:51.2: 15.74 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 10:14:52.67 +12:53:53.6: 14.04 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.28 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:06:44.25 +17:42:00.7: ref_mag=12.28 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2507 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.11 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:14:52.67 +12:53:53.6: ref_mag=14.11 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.4421 delta=-0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 11:04:41.28 +08:47:18.1: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:04:41.28 +08:47:18.1: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 11:08:28.82 +09:03:38.1: 15.06 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 11:00:06.46 +09:21:11.3: 14.66 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 11:03:34.69 +09:09:09.3: 15.01 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 11:09:38.72 +12:38:00.7: 14.85 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 10:49:54.20 +18:37:03.2: 15.63 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 11:09:29.23 +11:01:59.1: 15.00 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 10:17:41.95 +09:56:38.8: 15.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 10:49:54.20 +18:37:03.2: 15.65 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 11:08:28.82 +09:03:38.1: 14.68 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 11:09:29.23 +11:01:59.1: 14.55 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 11:09:38.72 +12:38:00.7: 14.73 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 11:00:06.46 +09:21:11.3: 14.74 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 11:03:34.69 +09:09:09.3: 14.98 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.64 +/- 0.18
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.83 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.72 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 10:49:54.20 +18:37:03.2: ref_mag=15.64 +/- 0.18 new_mean_mag=14.7185 delta=0.92 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.79 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.00 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.69 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:08:28.82 +09:03:38.1: ref_mag=14.83 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.3510 delta=0.48 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:09:29.23 +11:01:59.1: ref_mag=14.72 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.5508 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:09:38.72 +12:38:00.7: ref_mag=14.79 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.6167 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:03:34.69 +09:09:09.3: ref_mag=15.00 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.5448 delta=0.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:00:06.46 +09:21:11.3: ref_mag=14.69 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.3564 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 10:17:41.95 +09:56:38.8: 15.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 11:00:00.72 +14:07:41.9: 15.30 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 10:10:52.02 +17:37:24.4: 14.57 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 11:07:20.36 +10:35:33.4: 14.75 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 11:08:44.39 +09:50:46.1: 15.10 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 11:10:03.48 +14:43:00.1: 14.57 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 11:07:20.36 +10:35:33.4: 14.88 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.80 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:07:20.36 +10:35:33.4: ref_mag=14.80 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.5546 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 11:08:44.39 +09:50:46.1: 14.79 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 11:00:00.72 +14:07:41.9: 15.21 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 10:10:52.02 +17:37:24.4: 14.75 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 11:10:03.48 +14:43:00.1: 14.68 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.91 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.65 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.25 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.61 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:08:44.39 +09:50:46.1: ref_mag=14.91 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.5866 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:10:52.02 +17:37:24.4: ref_mag=14.65 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.5070 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:00:00.72 +14:07:41.9: ref_mag=15.25 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.5843 delta=0.67 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:10:03.48 +14:43:00.1: ref_mag=14.61 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.4886 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 11:05:40.94 +09:06:03.2: 14.90 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 11:10:03.98 +10:43:06.9: 15.00 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 11:07:13.73 +17:15:24.5: 15.38 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 11:08:44.39 +10:17:57.3: 14.78 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 10:11:56.69 +19:05:15.7: 15.21 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 10:11:56.69 +19:05:15.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:11:56.69 +19:05:15.7: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 11:05:40.94 +09:06:03.2: 14.95 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 11:10:03.98 +10:43:06.9: 14.94 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 11:08:44.39 +10:17:57.3: 14.76 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 11:07:13.73 +17:15:24.5: 14.87 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.92 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.97 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:05:40.94 +09:06:03.2: ref_mag=14.92 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.5954 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:10:03.98 +10:43:06.9: ref_mag=14.97 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.4928 delta=0.48 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.77 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.04 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:08:44.39 +10:17:57.3: ref_mag=14.77 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.6225 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:07:13.73 +17:15:24.5: ref_mag=15.04 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.7768 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 11:11:32.06 +17:19:41.0: 15.01 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 11:10:27.87 +13:49:13.6: 14.95 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 11:09:48.41 +09:05:02.1: 14.97 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 11:02:28.87 +11:17:59.0: 15.13 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 11:09:37.88 +08:57:34.5: 14.93 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 11:11:32.06 +17:19:41.0: 15.43 +/- 0.29 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.12 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:11:32.06 +17:19:41.0: ref_mag=15.12 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.8801 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 11:10:27.87 +13:49:13.6: 15.34 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 11:09:48.41 +09:05:02.1: 14.62 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.05 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.76 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:10:27.87 +13:49:13.6: ref_mag=15.05 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.6262 delta=0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:09:48.41 +09:05:02.1: ref_mag=14.76 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.4688 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 11:02:28.87 +11:17:59.0: 15.46 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 11:09:37.88 +08:57:34.5: 14.74 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.23 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:02:28.87 +11:17:59.0: ref_mag=15.23 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.7759 delta=0.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.83 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:09:37.88 +08:57:34.5: ref_mag=14.83 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.5933 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 10:57:34.77 +08:46:02.3: 14.83 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 10:57:34.77 +08:46:02.3: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:57:34.77 +08:46:02.3: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 11:08:46.72 +10:42:54.6: 14.89 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 11:08:01.50 +08:53:03.4: 14.88 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 11:04:32.46 +09:41:26.3: 15.00 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 11:09:36.82 +11:43:24.1: 14.91 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 11:12:42.21 +17:46:34.3: 15.03 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 11:12:42.21 +17:46:34.3: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:12:42.21 +17:46:34.3: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 11:08:46.72 +10:42:54.6: 14.82 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.86 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:08:46.72 +10:42:54.6: ref_mag=14.86 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.6826 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 11:04:32.46 +09:41:26.3: 14.64 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.78 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 11:08:01.50 +08:53:03.4: 15.18 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:04:32.46 +09:41:26.3: ref_mag=14.78 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.6933 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.97 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:08:01.50 +08:53:03.4: ref_mag=14.97 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.6636 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 10:51:47.06 +08:46:23.7: 14.88 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 11:09:36.82 +11:43:24.1: 15.26 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.00 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:09:36.82 +11:43:24.1: ref_mag=15.00 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.8615 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 11:10:19.38 +13:06:05.5: 14.70 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 10:51:47.06 +08:46:23.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:51:47.06 +08:46:23.7: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 11:04:54.57 +09:40:07.0: 15.11 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 10:46:07.67 +18:56:27.1: 15.23 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 10:11:57.17 +18:03:35.4: 15.18 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 11:10:19.38 +13:06:05.5: 15.05 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.79 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:10:19.38 +13:06:05.5: ref_mag=14.79 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.8363 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 10:14:34.97 +16:23:54.7: 15.16 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 11:04:54.57 +09:40:07.0: 15.09 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.10 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:04:54.57 +09:40:07.0: ref_mag=15.10 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.7672 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 10:11:57.17 +18:03:35.4: 15.00 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.08 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:11:57.17 +18:03:35.4: ref_mag=15.08 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.8988 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 10:46:07.67 +18:56:27.1: 15.17 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.20 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:46:07.67 +18:56:27.1: ref_mag=15.20 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.8765 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 10:46:25.00 +18:23:31.1: 15.08 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 10:14:34.97 +16:23:54.7: 15.32 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.22 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:14:34.97 +16:23:54.7: ref_mag=15.22 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.8842 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 11:10:37.26 +11:23:23.5: 14.86 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 11:11:04.91 +12:36:14.1: 14.74 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 10:46:25.00 +18:23:31.1: 15.14 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.10 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:46:25.00 +18:23:31.1: ref_mag=15.10 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.8906 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 10:07:57.75 +11:48:34.5: 15.07 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 10:07:57.75 +11:48:34.5: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:07:57.75 +11:48:34.5: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 10:15:56.30 +19:05:59.5: 15.00 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 10:15:56.30 +19:05:59.5: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:15:56.30 +19:05:59.5: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 11:11:04.91 +12:36:14.1: 15.15 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.85 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:11:04.91 +12:36:14.1: ref_mag=14.85 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.8159 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 11:10:23.87 +16:27:58.5: 14.91 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 11:10:37.26 +11:23:23.5: 15.54 +/- 0.32 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.98 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:10:37.26 +11:23:23.5: ref_mag=14.98 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.7038 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 11:10:23.87 +16:27:58.5: 15.16 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.99 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:10:23.87 +16:27:58.5: ref_mag=14.99 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.8634 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 10:57:14.98 +09:16:42.8: 14.84 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 11:11:06.19 +15:24:26.8: 14.83 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 10:08:47.08 +18:51:35.6: 15.02 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 10:11:05.77 +18:02:38.9: 15.46 +/- 0.29 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 10:56:57.60 +17:26:57.2: 15.34 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 10:57:14.98 +09:16:42.8: 14.78 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 11:11:06.19 +15:24:26.8: 15.26 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.81 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:57:14.98 +09:16:42.8: ref_mag=14.81 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.7760 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.94 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:11:06.19 +15:24:26.8: ref_mag=14.94 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.9293 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 10:08:47.08 +18:51:35.6: 14.65 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.77 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:08:47.08 +18:51:35.6: ref_mag=14.77 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.6585 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 10:11:05.77 +18:02:38.9: 14.65 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 10:56:57.60 +17:26:57.2: 15.12 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.78 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.22 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:11:05.77 +18:02:38.9: ref_mag=14.78 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.9429 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:56:57.60 +17:26:57.2: ref_mag=15.22 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.9598 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 11:09:53.31 +09:58:09.2: 14.97 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 11:04:14.70 +09:35:58.3: 14.82 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 11:09:48.34 +15:10:14.1: 14.97 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 10:56:59.21 +11:09:17.3: 15.84 +/- 0.31 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 10:08:58.07 +17:19:15.0: 15.21 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 11:09:53.31 +09:58:09.2: 15.10 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.01 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:09:53.31 +09:58:09.2: ref_mag=15.01 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.6658 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 11:04:14.70 +09:35:58.3: 14.83 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.82 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:04:14.70 +09:35:58.3: ref_mag=14.82 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.6112 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 11:09:48.34 +15:10:14.1: 14.90 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 10:10:13.69 +17:26:14.1: 14.87 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.94 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 10:56:59.21 +11:09:17.3: 15.50 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:09:48.34 +15:10:14.1: ref_mag=14.94 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.8187 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.63 +/- 0.19
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:56:59.21 +11:09:17.3: ref_mag=15.63 +/- 0.19 new_mean_mag=14.9193 delta=0.71 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 10:08:58.07 +17:19:15.0: 15.48 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.31 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:08:58.07 +17:19:15.0: ref_mag=15.31 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=14.9459 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 10:10:13.69 +17:26:14.1: 14.69 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.76 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:10:13.69 +17:26:14.1: ref_mag=14.76 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.8624 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 10:56:07.86 +14:27:29.6: 14.90 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 11:09:32.51 +10:54:01.2: 14.89 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 10:10:55.02 +17:38:14.9: 14.64 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 10:10:15.05 +16:56:25.3: 15.64 +/- 0.30 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 10:55:37.19 +08:43:34.6: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 10:55:37.19 +08:43:34.6: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:55:37.19 +08:43:34.6: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 10:56:07.86 +14:27:29.6: 14.86 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 11:11:07.37 +13:03:13.8: 14.79 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.88 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:56:07.86 +14:27:29.6: ref_mag=14.88 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.8457 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 11:09:32.51 +10:54:01.2: 15.51 +/- 0.31 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.01 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:09:32.51 +10:54:01.2: ref_mag=15.01 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.7914 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 10:10:55.02 +17:38:14.9: 14.60 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.62 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:10:55.02 +17:38:14.9: ref_mag=14.62 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.6245 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 10:10:15.05 +16:56:25.3: 15.02 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.16 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:10:15.05 +16:56:25.3: ref_mag=15.16 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.9458 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 11:11:07.37 +13:03:13.8: 15.39 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.91 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:11:07.37 +13:03:13.8: ref_mag=14.91 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.7459 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 10:24:45.88 +14:58:55.9: 15.05 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 11:08:11.52 +09:39:30.0: 14.87 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 11:00:06.79 +13:06:18.9: 14.91 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 11:00:24.46 +09:00:11.1: 15.59 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 10:24:45.88 +14:58:55.9: 15.07 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.06 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:24:45.88 +14:58:55.9: ref_mag=15.06 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.7599 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 11:08:11.52 +09:39:30.0: 15.06 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.93 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:08:11.52 +09:39:30.0: ref_mag=14.93 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.7233 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 11:00:06.79 +13:06:18.9: 15.80 +/- 0.33 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.03 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:00:06.79 +13:06:18.9: ref_mag=15.03 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.9363 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 11:00:24.46 +09:00:11.1: 15.75 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.59 +/- 0.28
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:00:24.46 +09:00:11.1: ref_mag=15.59 +/- 0.28 new_mean_mag=14.8405 delta=0.75 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53710.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53414.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53445.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53535.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53722.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 9s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52820_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 52820_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52896_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 52896_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:18:08.41 +14:50:31.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52952_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 52952_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53175_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 53175_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:57:56.28 +09:23:14.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53281_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 53281_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53352_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 53352_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:08:38.49 +11:59:18.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53414_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127
Preparing report for the candidate 53414_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53445_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127
Preparing report for the candidate 53445_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53472_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 53472_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53535_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127
Preparing report for the candidate 53535_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53587_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 53587_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53591_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 53591_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53606_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 53606_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53645_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 53645_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53688_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 53688_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53699_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 53699_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53703_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 53703_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53710_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 53710_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:49:54.20 +18:37:03.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.74, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.72)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.861 3983285337556150272 162.47587916390 +18.61732036080 14.1445 12.8797 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.861#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53720_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 53720_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53722_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127
Preparing report for the candidate 53722_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53727_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 53727_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53729_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 53729_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53735_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 53735_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53745_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 53745_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53752_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 53752_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53753_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 53753_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53759_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 53759_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:10:01.39 +09:54:03.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53763_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 53763_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53769_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 53769_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53774_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 53774_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53783_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 53783_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53796_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 53796_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53799_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 53799_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53807_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 53807_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:00:22.92 +10:19:24.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53814_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 53814_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53815_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 53815_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:11:34.36 +17:34:54.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53817_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 53817_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53818_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 53818_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53824_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 53824_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53839_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 53839_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53870_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 53870_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53877_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 53877_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53881_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 53881_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53884_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 53884_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53887_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 53887_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53888_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 53888_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53889_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 53889_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53903_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 53903_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53913_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 53913_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53917_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 53917_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53921_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 53921_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53922_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 53922_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53930_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 53930_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53937_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 53937_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53938_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 53938_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53945_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 53945_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53946_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 53946_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53947_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 53947_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53948_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 53948_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53950_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 53950_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53951_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 53951_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53964_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 53964_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:09:59.88 +12:56:33.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53967_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 53967_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53972_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 53972_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53979_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 53979_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53982_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 53982_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53984_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 53984_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:07:43.90 +10:10:36.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53992_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 53992_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53995_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 53995_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54000_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 54000_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:08:42.94 +10:01:50.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54003_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 54003_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54008_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 54008_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54014_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 54014_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54017_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 54017_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54021_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 54021_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54028_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 54028_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54036_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 54036_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54046_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 54046_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54065_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 54065_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54155_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 54155_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
