This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_235142_TTUQ2b1x1_19849_Bgnmv5tJ
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 11.1965 2461171.6965 13.41 11:45:38.11 +13:14:48.2
251.74620 69.28161 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 9.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.326 Tamara -1 0 1 13.0 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 11:45:38.11 +13:14:48.2: 16.05 +/- 0.32 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits at 11:45:38.11 +13:14:48.2: 16.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 16.05 +/- 0.32
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 11.1965* 11 45 38.11 +13 14 48.2 13.4 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461171.6965,13.41,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260511.1965 13.41CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 11.1965 2461171.6965 13.69 11:29:15.55 +11:29:00.6
247.98120 65.15953 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 9.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.595 Polyxena -1 -0 1 13.6 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 11:29:15.55 +11:29:00.6: 16.20 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits at 11:29:15.55 +11:29:00.6: 16.16 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 11.1965* 11 29 15.55 +11 29 00.6 13.7 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461171.6965,13.69,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260511.1965 13.69CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 11.1965 2461171.6965 14.45 11:36:11.25 +15:35:13.2
242.55370 69.06474 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 9.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.680 Genoveva -1 0 1 14.7 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 11:36:11.25 +15:35:13.2: 16.13 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits at 11:36:11.25 +15:35:13.2: 16.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 11.1965* 11 36 11.25 +15 35 13.2 14.4 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461171.6965,14.45,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260511.1965 14.45CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 11.1965 2461171.6965 14.99 11:34:01.71 +10:29:37.8
251.61999 65.32717 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.4" and 9.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.857 Glasenappia -3 1 3 15.5 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 11:34:01.71 +10:29:37.8: 16.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits at 11:34:01.71 +10:29:37.8: 16.13 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 11.1965* 11 34 01.71 +10 29 37.8 15.0 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461171.6965,14.99,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260511.1965 14.99CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461093.84038209 22.02.2026 08:09:59.013 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
First image: 2461093.84038209 22.02.2026 08:09:59.013 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Last image: 2461171.69671956 11.05.2026 04:43:06.570 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_235142_TTUQ2b1x1_19849_Bgnmv5tJ/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 6
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.58
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 2 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 5670
Objects passed selection criteria: 5647
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 4436.75
Average stars matched: 4043.75 (91.1422 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 111232 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun May 10 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-44-gd532a530
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-10)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun May 10 23:55:06 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461093.84038209 22.02.2026 08:09:59.013 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
First image: 2461093.84038209 22.02.2026 08:09:59.013 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Last image: 2461171.69671956 11.05.2026 04:43:06.570 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_235142_TTUQ2b1x1_19849_Bgnmv5tJ/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 36
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.28
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 9 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 28983
Objects passed selection criteria: 28884
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 23247
Average stars matched: 20998 (90.3256 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 129236 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun May 10 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-44-gd532a530
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-10)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun May 10 23:56:14 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_235142_TTUQ2b1x1_19849_Bgnmv5tJ/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-42-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_235142_TTUQ2b1x1_19849_Bgnmv5tJ/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_235142_TTUQ2b1x1_19849_Bgnmv5tJ/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-42-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_235142_TTUQ2b1x1_19849_Bgnmv5tJ/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461171.69621602
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_235142_TTUQ2b1x1_19849_Bgnmv5tJ/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_235142_TTUQ2b1x1_19849_Bgnmv5tJ/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_235142_TTUQ2b1x1_19849_Bgnmv5tJ/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-42-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_235142_TTUQ2b1x1_19849_Bgnmv5tJ/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-42-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_235142_TTUQ2b1x1_19849_Bgnmv5tJ/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_235142_TTUQ2b1x1_19849_Bgnmv5tJ/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-42-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_235142_TTUQ2b1x1_19849_Bgnmv5tJ/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_235142_TTUQ2b1x1_19849_Bgnmv5tJ/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-42-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_235142_TTUQ2b1x1_19849_Bgnmv5tJ/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_235142_TTUQ2b1x1_19849_Bgnmv5tJ/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_235142_TTUQ2b1x1_19849_Bgnmv5tJ/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-42-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-42-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_235142_TTUQ2b1x1_19849_Bgnmv5tJ/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-42-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
The guess is 605 arcmin.
The guess is 605 arcmin.
No image with WCS calibration found for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_235142_TTUQ2b1x1_19849_Bgnmv5tJ/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-42-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits .... Determining astrometry method...
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net software...
Choosing aperture...
Using the catalog image00003.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_235142_TTUQ2b1x1_19849_Bgnmv5tJ/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-42-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
No image with WCS calibration found for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_235142_TTUQ2b1x1_19849_Bgnmv5tJ/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits .... Determining astrometry method...
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net software...
Choosing aperture...
Using the catalog image00004.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_235142_TTUQ2b1x1_19849_Bgnmv5tJ/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits
util/wcs_image_calibration.sh: line 142: echo: write error: Broken pipe
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
The guess is 573 arcmin.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_235142_TTUQ2b1x1_19849_Bgnmv5tJ/lib/make_outxyls_for_astrometri'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits'
Catalog wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
verification OK: wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
The guess is 573 arcmin.
c_calibration found 5583 high-SNR stars for plate solving
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_235142_TTUQ2b1x1_19849_Bgnmv5tJ/lib/make_outxyls_for_astrometric_calibration found 5591 high-SNR stars for plate solving
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Generating wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat from image00002.cat
verification OK: wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
This service uses tools provided by Astrometry.net.
For more information visit http://astrometry.net/
This service uses tools provided by Astrometry.net.
For more information visit http://astrometry.net/
######### Trying to solve plate assuming 605' field of view #########
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_235142_TTUQ2b1x1_19849_Bgnmv5tJ/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net code
IMAGE_SIZE= --width 9576 --height 6388 SCALE_LOW=544.5 SCALE_HIGH=3025.0
Using solve-field binary
/usr/local/astrometry/bin/solve-field
######### Trying to solve plate assuming 605' field of view #########
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_235142_TTUQ2b1x1_19849_Bgnmv5tJ/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-42-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net code
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out47192.xyls"...
Catalog wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits created.
IMAGE_SIZE= --width 9576 --height 6388 SCALE_LOW=544.5 SCALE_HIGH=3025.0
Using solve-field binary
/usr/local/astrometry/bin/solve-field
verification OK: wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out47188.xyls"...
Generating wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat from image00001.cat
Catalog wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
verification OK: wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
verification OK: wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:33:20.692 +14:00:05.86 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
Image size: 941.7'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:33:22.632 +14:00:35.39 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 5845 stars ###
### Converted positions of 5851 stars ###
'wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_235142_TTUQ2b1x1_19849_Bgnmv5tJ/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky47608.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_235142_TTUQ2b1x1_19849_Bgnmv5tJ/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky47569.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading file "./out47192.axy"...
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4119.fits, field objects 1-10).
Reading file "./out47188.axy"...
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4118.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4119.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4118.fits, field objects 1-10).
'tocp_transients_list.txt' -> '../tocp_transients_list.txt'
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4117.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4117.fits, field objects 1-10).
log-odds ratio 81.8851 (3.64962e+35), 13 match, 0 conflict, 19 distractors, 24 index.
RA,Dec = (173.33,13.9926), pixel scale 5.95242 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -+-+--+++--+++---+--+--++------+(best)--------------------------------------------------------------------
log-odds ratio 85.0814 (8.91994e+36), 13 match, 0 conflict, 13 distractors, 24 index.
RA,Dec = (173.344,14.0022), pixel scale 5.95255 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -+-+--+++--+++---+--+--+++(best)--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Field 1: solved with index index-4116.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out47188.solved to indicate this.
Field: out47188.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (173.336743, 13.992963) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (11:33:20.818, +13:59:34.667).
Field size: 15.732 x 10.5341 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is 179.8 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Inserting WCS header... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_235142_TTUQ2b1x1_19849_Bgnmv5tJ/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-42-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits' -> 'fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-42-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits'
Field 1: solved with index index-4116.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out47192.solved to indicate this.
Field: out47192.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (173.350114, 14.002616) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (11:33:24.027, +14:00:09.416).
Field size: 15.732 x 10.5341 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is 179.799 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Inserting WCS header... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_235142_TTUQ2b1x1_19849_Bgnmv5tJ/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits' -> 'fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits'
WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M May 10 23:55 fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-42-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K May 10 23:55 out47188.wcs
Inserting WCS header (1st iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-42-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-42-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits)... done!
WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M May 10 23:55 fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K May 10 23:55 out47192.wcs
Inserting WCS header (1st iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits)... done!
done!
done!
All done!
done
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_235142_TTUQ2b1x1_19849_Bgnmv5tJ/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-42-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits (fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-42-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits)
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration01' / astrometry.net run
All done!
done
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_235142_TTUQ2b1x1_19849_Bgnmv5tJ/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits (fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits)
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration01' / astrometry.net run
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out47188.xyls"...
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out47192.xyls"...
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading file "./out47192.axy"...
Only searching for solutions within 15.6483 degrees of RA,Dec (173.349,14.0018)
log-odds ratio 85.0814 (8.91994e+36), 13 match, 0 conflict, 13 distractors, 24 index.
RA,Dec = (173.344,14.0022), pixel scale 5.95255 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -+-+--+++--+++---+--+--+++(best)--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading file "./out47188.axy"...
Only searching for solutions within 15.6483 degrees of RA,Dec (173.336,13.9921)
log-odds ratio 81.8851 (3.64962e+35), 13 match, 0 conflict, 19 distractors, 24 index.
RA,Dec = (173.33,13.9926), pixel scale 5.95242 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -+-+--+++--+++---+--+--++------+(best)--------------------------------------------------------------------
Field 1: solved with index index-4116.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out47192.solved to indicate this.
Field: out47192.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (173.350801, 14.001245) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (11:33:24.192, +14:00:04.481).
Field size: 15.7009 x 10.5307 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is 179.799 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Field 1: solved with index index-4116.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out47188.solved to indicate this.
Field: out47188.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (173.337413, 13.991597) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (11:33:20.979, +13:59:29.749).
Field size: 15.7008 x 10.5306 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is 179.799 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M May 10 23:55 fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K May 10 23:55 out47192.wcs
Inserting WCS header (2nd iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits)... done!
WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M May 10 23:55 fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-42-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K May 10 23:55 out47188.wcs
Inserting WCS header (2nd iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-42-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-42-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits)... done!
done!
done!
All done!
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors.
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration02' / astrometry.net run
The field of view is large: we'll try to run Astromety.net code on the image itself rather than a star list
Reading input file "wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits"...
Found an existing WCS header, will try to verify it.
Extracting sources...
All done!
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors.
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration02' / astrometry.net run
The field of view is large: we'll try to run Astromety.net code on the image itself rather than a star list
Reading input file "wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-42-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits"...
Found an existing WCS header, will try to verify it.
Extracting sources...
simplexy: found 21845 sources.
simplexy: found 22098 sources.
Solving...
Solving...
Reading file "./wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162.axy"...
Verifying WCS using indices with quads of size [63.4696, 951.447] arcmin
Reading file "./wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-42-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0161.axy"...
Verifying WCS using indices with quads of size [63.4697, 951.449] arcmin
Verifying WCS with index 39 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4117.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
Verifying WCS with index 39 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4117.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 39.2486 (1.11032e+17), 11 match, 0 conflict, 282 distractors, 11 index.
RA,Dec = (173.338,13.9924), pixel scale 5.96146 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -+-----------------------------+------+------------+--+-------------------------------------+-------
--> log-odds 17.4942
Verifying WCS with index 40 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4116.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 160.567 (5.41115e+69), 24 match, 0 conflict, 305 distractors, 24 index.
RA,Dec = (173.352,14.0021), pixel scale 5.96145 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: --+-+--------------------------++-----+------------+--+-----+---------------------------------------
--> log-odds 39.2486
Verifying WCS with index 40 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4116.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 158.677 (8.17785e+68), 24 match, 0 conflict, 269 distractors, 24 index.
RA,Dec = (173.338,13.9924), pixel scale 5.96146 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -++------------------+---------+------+------------+--+---------------------------------+---+-------
--> log-odds 160.567
Verifying WCS with index 41 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4115.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 398.132 (8.06305e+172), 44 match, 0 conflict, 285 distractors, 45 index.
RA,Dec = (173.352,14.0021), pixel scale 5.96145 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: --+-++---+----+-----+-----+--+-++-+---+--------+---+--+-----+-----+-+--+------+-------+-------------
--> log-odds 158.677
Verifying WCS with index 41 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4115.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 401.434 (2.19075e+174), 44 match, 0 conflict, 249 distractors, 45 index.
RA,Dec = (173.338,13.9924), pixel scale 5.96146 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -++--+-++---+--------+----+--+-+------+------------+--++----+---------++--+-----++----+-+---+-------
--> log-odds 398.132
Verifying WCS with index 42 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4114.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 829.293 (inf), 88 match, 0 conflict, 401 distractors, 90 index.
RA,Dec = (173.352,14.0021), pixel scale 5.96145 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: --++++---++---+-----+-----+-++-++-+-+-+-+++----+-+-+--+---+-+-+-+-+-+-+++-----+-----+-+---------+---
--> log-odds 401.434
Verifying WCS with index 42 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4114.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 843.455 (inf), 88 match, 0 conflict, 369 distractors, 90 index.
RA,Dec = (173.338,13.9924), pixel scale 5.96146 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -++-++-++--++----+---+----+-++-+------+-+-+-+---++++--+++---+-+--+----++-++---+-++---++-+---+---+---
--> log-odds 829.293
Verifying WCS with index 43 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4113.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 1788.63 (inf), 188 match, 0 conflict, 301 distractors, 191 index.
RA,Dec = (173.352,14.0021), pixel scale 5.96145 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +-+++++-+++-++++-+-++-++--+-++-++-+-+++-+++--++++++++-+++-+-+++-+-+++++++-+-++++++-++++++---+-+-++-+
--> log-odds 843.455
Verifying WCS with index 43 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4113.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 1797.66 (inf), 188 match, 0 conflict, 283 distractors, 191 index.
RA,Dec = (173.338,13.9924), pixel scale 5.96146 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++-++-++--+++++++++++-+-+++++++-++-+-+-+-+-++++++++--+++-+++++-+++++++++++--++++++--++++--++++-+--+
--> log-odds 1788.63
Verifying WCS with index 44 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4112.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 3416.56 (inf), 377 match, 0 conflict, 479 distractors, 383 index.
RA,Dec = (173.352,14.0021), pixel scale 5.96145 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++++++-++++++++++++++++-++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-+++++++++++++++++-+++++++++++++-+-++++++++
--> log-odds 1797.66
Verifying WCS with index 44 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4112.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 3421.63 (inf), 377 match, 0 conflict, 654 distractors, 383 index.
RA,Dec = (173.338,13.9924), pixel scale 5.96146 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++++++++++++++++++-+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-+++++++-+++++++++++++-+
--> log-odds 3416.56
Verifying WCS with index 45 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4111.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 5947.03 (inf), 702 match, 0 conflict, 1023 distractors, 710 index.
RA,Dec = (173.352,14.0021), pixel scale 5.96145 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++++++-++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
--> log-odds 3421.63
Verifying WCS with index 45 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4111.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 5947.33 (inf), 700 match, 0 conflict, 839 distractors, 708 index.
RA,Dec = (173.338,13.9924), pixel scale 5.96146 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++++++++++++++++++-+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
--> log-odds 5947.03
Verifying WCS with index 46 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4110.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 11049.1 (inf), 1422 match, 0 conflict, 3105 distractors, 1437 index.
RA,Dec = (173.352,14.0021), pixel scale 5.96145 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
--> log-odds 5947.33
Verifying WCS with index 46 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4110.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 11050.2 (inf), 1419 match, 0 conflict, 3212 distractors, 1434 index.
RA,Dec = (173.338,13.9924), pixel scale 5.96146 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
--> log-odds 11049.1
Got 7 solutions.
Field: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (173.349467, 14.000928) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (11:33:23.872, +14:00:03.340).
Field size: 15.7047 x 10.5293 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is 179.796 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Creating new FITS file "./wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162.new"...
--> log-odds 11050.2
Got 8 solutions.
Field: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-42-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (173.336083, 13.991302) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (11:33:20.660, +13:59:28.686).
Field size: 15.7047 x 10.5292 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is 179.796 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Creating new FITS file "./wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-42-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0161.new"...
renamed 'wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162.new' -> 'wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits'
renamed 'wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-42-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0161.new' -> 'wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-42-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits'
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-42-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-42-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-42-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-42-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits was not found.
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_235142_TTUQ2b1x1_19849_Bgnmv5tJ/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-42-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_235142_TTUQ2b1x1_19849_Bgnmv5tJ/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-42-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits
Generating wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits.cat from image00004.cat
Generating wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-42-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.cat from image00003.cat
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits created.
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-42-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-42-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-42-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-42-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits
Image size: 937.0'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:33:23.668 +14:00:00.35 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
Image size: 937.0'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:33:20.456 +13:59:25.70 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 5786 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
### Converted positions of 5804 stars ###
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_235142_TTUQ2b1x1_19849_Bgnmv5tJ/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky50328.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-42-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_235142_TTUQ2b1x1_19849_Bgnmv5tJ/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky50331.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-42-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits'
wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits'
wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-42-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-42-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-42-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-42-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits'
wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:33:20.692 +14:00:05.86 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-42-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-42-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Image size: 937.0'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:33:20.456 +13:59:25.70 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:33:20.692 +14:00:05.86
Second-epoch image center 11:33:20.456 +13:59:25.70
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0112 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits
Image size: 937.0'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:33:23.668 +14:00:00.35 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:33:20.692 +14:00:05.86
Second-epoch image center 11:33:23.668 +14:00:00.35
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0121 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
ref2=wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
new1=wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-42-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
new2=wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
reference average sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
INFO: WCS quality sigma_overall_arcsec not available for comparison (1st new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality sigma_overall_arcsec not available for comparison (2nd new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio not available for comparison (1st new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio not available for comparison (2nd new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 11:33:20.456 +13:59:25.70
Second-epoch second image center 11:33:23.668 +14:00:00.35
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01616 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits &> /tmp/tmp.X8BXJvPFqt
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits &> /tmp/tmp.JXXYu7bnhM
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_235142_TTUQ2b1x1_19849_Bgnmv5tJ/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-42-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits &> /tmp/tmp.EEpbyJ0w9e
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_235142_TTUQ2b1x1_19849_Bgnmv5tJ/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-42-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_235142_TTUQ2b1x1_19849_Bgnmv5tJ/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits &> /tmp/tmp.1jKgOzQXBj
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_235142_TTUQ2b1x1_19849_Bgnmv5tJ/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits) and catalog (wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 5845 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 164.9322 to 181.4966 deg, Dec +8.4844 to +19.3112 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 164.9322 to 181.4966 deg, Dec 8.4844 to 19.3112 deg
Loaded 3827 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2957 out of 3146 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3146 out of 5845 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.922700
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.922700
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.58
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.34
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.34
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 5845 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 164.9322 to 181.4966 deg, Dec +8.4844 to +19.3112 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 164.9322 to 181.4966 deg, Dec 8.4844 to 19.3112 deg
Loaded 3827 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2957 out of 3146 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3146 out of 5845 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (aperture=6.3)
Read 5851 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 164.9329 to 181.4972 deg, Dec +8.5231 to +19.3318 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 164.9329 to 181.4972 deg, Dec 8.5231 to 19.3318 deg
Loaded 3815 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2962 out of 3141 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3141 out of 5851 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits (aperture=6.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 6 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
2.2 pix Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
2.3 pix fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-42-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
2.3 pix fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
15.3 mag. Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
15.3 mag. fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-42-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
15.3 mag. fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.3 (SNR ) 12.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.X8BXJvPFqt (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_235142_TTUQ2b1x1_19849_Bgnmv5tJ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=451, passed=5845
Got 5845 stars (including 5387 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5845 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 965 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5754 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5755 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5755 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 978 stars left (next iteration limit 1075)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits N_match=978 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.420 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.465 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.410 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.409 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.383 n_q1=249 n_q2=272 n_q3=235 n_q4=222 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.107
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits -region wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.JXXYu7bnhM (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_235142_TTUQ2b1x1_19849_Bgnmv5tJ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=436, passed=5851
Got 5851 stars (including 5411 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5851 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 964 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5764 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5763 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5763 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 977 stars left (next iteration limit 1074)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits N_match=977 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.420 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.475 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.391 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.455 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.378 n_q1=257 n_q2=269 n_q3=229 n_q4=222 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.131
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits -region wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.EEpbyJ0w9e (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_235142_TTUQ2b1x1_19849_Bgnmv5tJ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_235142_TTUQ2b1x1_19849_Bgnmv5tJ/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-42-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_235142_TTUQ2b1x1_19849_Bgnmv5tJ/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-42-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_235142_TTUQ2b1x1_19849_Bgnmv5tJ/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-42-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_235142_TTUQ2b1x1_19849_Bgnmv5tJ/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-42-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_235142_TTUQ2b1x1_19849_Bgnmv5tJ/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-42-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_235142_TTUQ2b1x1_19849_Bgnmv5tJ/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-42-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-42-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-42-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-42-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-42-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-42-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-42-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-42-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_235142_TTUQ2b1x1_19849_Bgnmv5tJ/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-42-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-42-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=329, passed=5804
Got 5804 stars (including 5469 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-42-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5804 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.7 to 19.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 960 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5674 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.7 to 19.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5676 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5676 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 972 stars left (next iteration limit 1069)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-42-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits N_match=972 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.402 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.355 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.550 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.338 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.467 n_q1=204 n_q2=237 n_q3=257 n_q4=274 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.369
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-42-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-42-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_235142_TTUQ2b1x1_19849_Bgnmv5tJ/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-42-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-42-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-42-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.1jKgOzQXBj (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_235142_TTUQ2b1x1_19849_Bgnmv5tJ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_235142_TTUQ2b1x1_19849_Bgnmv5tJ/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_235142_TTUQ2b1x1_19849_Bgnmv5tJ/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_235142_TTUQ2b1x1_19849_Bgnmv5tJ/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_235142_TTUQ2b1x1_19849_Bgnmv5tJ/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_235142_TTUQ2b1x1_19849_Bgnmv5tJ/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_235142_TTUQ2b1x1_19849_Bgnmv5tJ/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_235142_TTUQ2b1x1_19849_Bgnmv5tJ/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=346, passed=5786
Got 5786 stars (including 5435 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5786 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.7 to 19.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 965 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5668 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.7 to 19.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5668 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5668 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 973 stars left (next iteration limit 1070)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits N_match=973 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.442 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.367 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.592 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.353 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.523 n_q1=207 n_q2=235 n_q3=252 n_q4=279 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.340
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_235142_TTUQ2b1x1_19849_Bgnmv5tJ/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-42-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-42-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_235142_TTUQ2b1x1_19849_Bgnmv5tJ/wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-42-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_235142_TTUQ2b1x1_19849_Bgnmv5tJ/wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Leo-06-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20476_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162
The candidate 20476_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:25:36.52 +16:28:17.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20862_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162
The candidate 20862_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:26:12.19 +17:39:39.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20923_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162
The candidate 20923_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:33:03.71 +12:09:12.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21030_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162
The candidate 21030_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:24:03.50 +10:29:10.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21053_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162
The candidate 21053_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:35:49.77 +11:23:25.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04578_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162
The candidate 04578_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:23:40.25 +16:51:04.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Leo-06-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_235142_TTUQ2b1x1_19849_Bgnmv5tJ/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-42-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_235142_TTUQ2b1x1_19849_Bgnmv5tJ/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_235142_TTUQ2b1x1_19849_Bgnmv5tJ/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-42-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_235142_TTUQ2b1x1_19849_Bgnmv5tJ/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-42-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_235142_TTUQ2b1x1_19849_Bgnmv5tJ/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_235142_TTUQ2b1x1_19849_Bgnmv5tJ/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_235142_TTUQ2b1x1_19849_Bgnmv5tJ/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-42-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_235142_TTUQ2b1x1_19849_Bgnmv5tJ/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-42-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_235142_TTUQ2b1x1_19849_Bgnmv5tJ/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-42-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_235142_TTUQ2b1x1_19849_Bgnmv5tJ/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_235142_TTUQ2b1x1_19849_Bgnmv5tJ/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-42-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_235142_TTUQ2b1x1_19849_Bgnmv5tJ/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_235142_TTUQ2b1x1_19849_Bgnmv5tJ/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-42-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-42-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_235142_TTUQ2b1x1_19849_Bgnmv5tJ/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-42-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_235142_TTUQ2b1x1_19849_Bgnmv5tJ/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_235142_TTUQ2b1x1_19849_Bgnmv5tJ/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
The guess is 605 arcmin.
The guess is 605 arcmin.
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-42-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-42-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-42-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-42-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-42-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits was not found.
util/wcs_image_calibration.sh: line 142: echo: write error: Broken pipe
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_235142_TTUQ2b1x1_19849_Bgnmv5tJ/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-42-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits was not found.
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-42-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_235142_TTUQ2b1x1_19849_Bgnmv5tJ/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
The guess is 573 arcmin.
The guess is 573 arcmin.
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits was not found.
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
verification OK: wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
verification OK: wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
Generating wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-42-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.cat from image00003.cat
Generating wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits.cat from image00004.cat
Generating wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat from image00002.cat
Generating wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat from image00001.cat
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-42-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-42-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-42-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits
Catalog wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
Catalog wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-42-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
verification OK: wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits
verification OK: wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
verification OK: wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:33:20.692 +14:00:05.86 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
Image size: 937.0'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:33:20.456 +13:59:25.70 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
Image size: 937.0'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:33:23.668 +14:00:00.35 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
Image size: 941.7'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:33:22.632 +14:00:35.39 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 27311 stars ###
### Converted positions of 27487 stars ###
### Converted positions of 30117 stars ###
### Converted positions of 30089 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-42-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_235142_TTUQ2b1x1_19849_Bgnmv5tJ/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky58610.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-42-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
'wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_235142_TTUQ2b1x1_19849_Bgnmv5tJ/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky58620.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits
'wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_235142_TTUQ2b1x1_19849_Bgnmv5tJ/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky58630.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_235142_TTUQ2b1x1_19849_Bgnmv5tJ/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky58641.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-42-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:33:20.692 +14:00:05.86 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-42-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-42-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Image size: 937.0'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:33:20.456 +13:59:25.70 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:33:20.692 +14:00:05.86
Second-epoch image center 11:33:20.456 +13:59:25.70
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0112 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits
Image size: 937.0'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:33:23.668 +14:00:00.35 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:33:20.692 +14:00:05.86
Second-epoch image center 11:33:23.668 +14:00:00.35
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0121 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
ref2=wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
new1=wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-42-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
new2=wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
reference average sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
INFO: WCS quality sigma_overall_arcsec not available for comparison (1st new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality sigma_overall_arcsec not available for comparison (2nd new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio not available for comparison (1st new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio not available for comparison (2nd new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 11:33:20.456 +13:59:25.70
Second-epoch second image center 11:33:23.668 +14:00:00.35
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01616 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits &> /tmp/tmp.wSqLGUPmNM
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits &> /tmp/tmp.DQULtX0aWI
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_235142_TTUQ2b1x1_19849_Bgnmv5tJ/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-42-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits &> /tmp/tmp.KHXAPPRerr
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_235142_TTUQ2b1x1_19849_Bgnmv5tJ/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-42-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_235142_TTUQ2b1x1_19849_Bgnmv5tJ/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits &> /tmp/tmp.oaqhV4a8bi
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_235142_TTUQ2b1x1_19849_Bgnmv5tJ/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits) and catalog (wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 30089 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 164.9322 to 181.5060 deg, Dec +8.4661 to +19.3314 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 164.9322 to 181.5060 deg, Dec 8.4661 to 19.3314 deg
Loaded 3838 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2863 out of 3171 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3171 out of 30089 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.808900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.808900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.28
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.53
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.53
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 30089 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 164.9322 to 181.5060 deg, Dec +8.4661 to +19.3314 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 164.9322 to 181.5060 deg, Dec 8.4661 to 19.3314 deg
Loaded 3838 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2863 out of 3171 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3171 out of 30089 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (aperture=4.9)
Read 30117 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 164.9329 to 181.5106 deg, Dec +8.4752 to +19.3348 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 164.9329 to 181.5106 deg, Dec 8.4752 to 19.3348 deg
Loaded 3840 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2876 out of 3175 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3175 out of 30117 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits (aperture=5.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 25 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
2.1 pix Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
2.2 pix fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-42-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
2.2 pix fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits
2.0 pix wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
15.5 mag. Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
15.4 mag. fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-42-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
15.4 mag. fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.4 (SNR ) 14.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.wSqLGUPmNM (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_235142_TTUQ2b1x1_19849_Bgnmv5tJ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=15, blended=1260, passed=30074
Got 30074 stars (including 28759 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 30074 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 971 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29780 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29780 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29780 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 978 stars left (next iteration limit 1075)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits N_match=978 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.400 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.427 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.382 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.396 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.366 n_q1=244 n_q2=273 n_q3=235 n_q4=226 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.069
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits -region wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.DQULtX0aWI (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_235142_TTUQ2b1x1_19849_Bgnmv5tJ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=16, blended=1200, passed=30101
Got 30101 stars (including 28849 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 30101 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 979 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 967 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29753 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 979 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29753 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29753 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 979 stars left (next iteration limit 1076)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits N_match=979 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.413 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.462 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.379 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.416 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.370 n_q1=252 n_q2=273 n_q3=231 n_q4=223 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.120
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits -region wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.KHXAPPRerr (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_235142_TTUQ2b1x1_19849_Bgnmv5tJ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_235142_TTUQ2b1x1_19849_Bgnmv5tJ/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-42-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_235142_TTUQ2b1x1_19849_Bgnmv5tJ/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-42-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_235142_TTUQ2b1x1_19849_Bgnmv5tJ/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-42-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_235142_TTUQ2b1x1_19849_Bgnmv5tJ/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-42-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_235142_TTUQ2b1x1_19849_Bgnmv5tJ/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-42-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_235142_TTUQ2b1x1_19849_Bgnmv5tJ/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-42-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-42-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-42-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-42-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-42-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-42-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-42-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-42-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_235142_TTUQ2b1x1_19849_Bgnmv5tJ/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-42-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-42-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=1282, passed=27303
Got 27303 stars (including 25991 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-42-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 27303 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 963 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26788 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26787 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26787 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 974 stars left (next iteration limit 1071)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-42-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits N_match=974 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.399 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.358 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.507 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.325 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.474 n_q1=217 n_q2=235 n_q3=265 n_q4=257 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.272
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-42-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-42-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_235142_TTUQ2b1x1_19849_Bgnmv5tJ/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-42-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-42-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-42-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.oaqhV4a8bi (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_235142_TTUQ2b1x1_19849_Bgnmv5tJ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_235142_TTUQ2b1x1_19849_Bgnmv5tJ/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_235142_TTUQ2b1x1_19849_Bgnmv5tJ/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_235142_TTUQ2b1x1_19849_Bgnmv5tJ/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_235142_TTUQ2b1x1_19849_Bgnmv5tJ/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_235142_TTUQ2b1x1_19849_Bgnmv5tJ/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_235142_TTUQ2b1x1_19849_Bgnmv5tJ/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_235142_TTUQ2b1x1_19849_Bgnmv5tJ/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=1298, passed=27476
Got 27476 stars (including 26135 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 27476 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.7 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 963 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27037 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.7 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27035 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27035 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 975 stars left (next iteration limit 1072)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits N_match=975 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.466 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.368 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.589 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.354 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.557 n_q1=214 n_q2=235 n_q3=264 n_q4=262 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.265
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_235142_TTUQ2b1x1_19849_Bgnmv5tJ/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-42-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_235142_TTUQ2b1x1_19849_Bgnmv5tJ/wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-42-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_235142_TTUQ2b1x1_19849_Bgnmv5tJ/wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Leo-06-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 11:45:38.11 +13:14:48.2: 16.05 +/- 0.32 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 11:40:24.80 +13:41:10.5: 13.78 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 11:45:50.31 +15:35:24.6: 14.42 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 11:38:04.81 +12:46:29.5: 13.74 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 11:29:15.55 +11:29:00.6: 16.20 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 11:36:11.25 +15:35:13.2: 16.13 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits at 11:45:38.11 +13:14:48.2: 16.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits at 11:40:24.80 +13:41:10.5: 13.73 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 16.05 +/- 0.32
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.75 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 11:45:38.11 +13:14:48.2: ref_mag=16.05 +/- 0.32 new_mean_mag=13.4062 delta=2.64 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:40:24.80 +13:41:10.5: ref_mag=13.75 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7288 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits at 11:45:50.31 +15:35:24.6: 14.30 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.36 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:45:50.31 +15:35:24.6: ref_mag=14.36 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.7361 delta=-0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits at 11:38:04.81 +12:46:29.5: 13.67 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.70 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:38:04.81 +12:46:29.5: ref_mag=13.70 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.9777 delta=-0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits at 11:29:15.55 +11:29:00.6: 16.16 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits at 11:36:11.25 +15:35:13.2: 16.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 11:48:18.03 +16:43:37.4: 15.12 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 11:34:01.71 +10:29:37.8: 16.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits at 11:48:18.03 +16:43:37.4: 15.38 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits at 11:34:01.71 +10:29:37.8: 16.13 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.22 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:48:18.03 +16:43:37.4: ref_mag=15.22 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.9648 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53465.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53898.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out55164.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out56586.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 8s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51687_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162
The candidate 51687_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51692_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162
The candidate 51692_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:26:19.98 +10:18:14.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51695_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162
The candidate 51695_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51696_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162
The candidate 51696_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:44:43.57 +12:06:45.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51697_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162
The candidate 51697_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51975_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162
The candidate 51975_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:25:36.51 +16:28:18.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53193_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162
The candidate 53193_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:15:56.21 +12:49:01.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53312_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162
The candidate 53312_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:38:01.99 +12:59:06.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53465_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162
Preparing report for the candidate 53465_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53618_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162
The candidate 53618_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:18:56.39 +10:11:22.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53898_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162
Preparing report for the candidate 53898_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54086_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162
The candidate 54086_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:43:39.46 +10:42:04.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54488_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162
The candidate 54488_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:31:23.65 +16:05:34.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54959_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162
The candidate 54959_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:31:37.59 +14:21:14.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54980_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162
The candidate 54980_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:50:19.76 +10:24:34.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55164_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162
Preparing report for the candidate 55164_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55518_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162
The candidate 55518_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:27:56.31 +12:00:13.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56317_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162
The candidate 56317_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:46:02.04 +12:19:59.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56332_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162
The candidate 56332_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:25:19.93 +12:14:25.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56423_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162
The candidate 56423_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:48:05.54 +16:18:16.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56554_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162
The candidate 56554_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:36:09.95 +10:03:20.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56558_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162
The candidate 56558_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56586_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162
Preparing report for the candidate 56586_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56725_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162
The candidate 56725_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:50:59.60 +15:29:19.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26067_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162
The candidate 26067_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0162 did not pass the final checks