NMW transient search results

This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn

The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.

Processing fields Leo-02-Q1b1x1

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 05 11.19688    2461171.69688    11.76    10:33:19.88 +26:23:04.0   1685 0305   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 05 11.19767    2461171.69767    11.76    10:33:19.92 +26:23:03.7   1679 0299   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 05 11.1973  2461171.6973  11.76  10:33:19.90 +26:23:03.9
206.30756  59.25887 galactic  Leo  Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 8.1 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
511 Davida                  -2      1       2  11.9     0    0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits at 10:33:19.90 +26:23:03.9:  15.85 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 10:33:19.90 +26:23:03.9:  15.77 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 05 11.19688    2461171.69688    12.38    10:33:08.17 +23:45:46.4   1553 1893   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 05 11.19767    2461171.69767    12.35    10:33:08.19 +23:45:46.5   1548 1887   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 05 11.1973  2461171.6973  12.37  10:33:08.18 +23:45:46.4
211.27707  58.69487 galactic  Leo  Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 8.1 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
416 Vaticana                -1      1       1  12.6    -0    0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits at 10:33:08.18 +23:45:46.4:  15.99 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 10:33:08.18 +23:45:46.4:  15.88 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 05 11.19688    2461171.69688    13.98    10:31:18.41 +22:27:39.4   1730 2703   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 05 11.19767    2461171.69767    13.99    10:31:18.38 +22:27:38.8   1725 2697   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 05 11.1973  2461171.6973  13.98  10:31:18.40 +22:27:39.1
213.47459  57.95923 galactic  Leo  Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 8.0 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
508 Princetonia             -2      1       2  14.1     0    0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits at 10:31:18.40 +22:27:39.1:  16.16 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 10:31:18.40 +22:27:39.1:  16.05 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 05 11.19688    2461171.69688    14.40    09:48:13.77 +23:29:47.5   7743 2451   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 05 11.19767    2461171.69767    14.39    09:48:13.81 +23:29:46.7   7737 2446   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 05 11.1973  2461171.6973  14.39  09:48:13.79 +23:29:47.1
207.43238  48.65962 galactic  Leo  Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 7.8 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
567 Eleutheria              -4      2       4  14.6    -0    0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits at 09:48:13.79 +23:29:47.1:  16.21 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 09:48:13.79 +23:29:47.1:  16.13 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Processing complete!

Total number of candidates identified: 4

Processing log:

Filtering log:

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.0
FLAT_FIELD_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-04-22_multinight.fit
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 8000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 4000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 3.5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
Leo-02-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Leo-02-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing Leo-02-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 168189 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 168189 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0118.png' -> 'transient_report/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits_preview.png'
Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits

renamed 'Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.png' -> 'transient_report/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits_preview.png'
Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits


Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold. ---------------------------------------------- INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 480.6160 INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 507.6271 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 996.2308 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 498.3514 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 994.6738 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 499.7283 ---------------------------------------------- INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 2.07282 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.003 ---------------------------------------------- Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-04-22_multinight.fit EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= -5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 14.289999961853 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 11.7 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits CCD-TEMP= -5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits SET-TEMP= -5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-05-10T23:43:20.5802847' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-05-11T04:43:20.5802847' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61171.1967659723 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-05-11T04:43:30.4824776' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61171.1968805785 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= -5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 152.306476040399 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 21.9995631982618 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 48.5861111111111 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 265.399444444444 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.33237756855035 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Leo-02' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '10 09 14' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+22 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29458 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29458 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 14.289999961853 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 14.289999961853 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 9.3 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 85.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 908.09 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 11.7 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 235.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 16.601328 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 13.701096 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= -5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits SET-TEMP= -5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-22.fit CCD-TEMP= -5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits CCD-TEMP= -5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-22.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-22.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/d_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits :) Spent 0.515589 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-22.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/d_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-04-22_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 37850.569222 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24504.0, right_median=28262.5) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-04-22_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= -5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -4.9 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 14.289999961853 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 11.7 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits CCD-TEMP= -4.900000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits SET-TEMP= -5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-05-10T23:44:28.8661972' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-05-11T04:44:28.8661972' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61171.1975563196 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-05-11T04:44:38.7669598' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61171.1976709026 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= -5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -4.9 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 152.306476098464 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 21.9995631741498 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 48.3502777777778 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 265.578333333333 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.33722830101264 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Leo-02' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '10 09 14' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+22 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29458 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29458 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 14.289999961853 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 14.289999961853 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 9.3 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 85.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 908.09 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 11.7 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 235.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 16.601328 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 13.701096 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= -5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits SET-TEMP= -5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-22.fit CCD-TEMP= -4.900000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits CCD-TEMP= -5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-22.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-22.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/d_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits :) Spent 0.507907 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-22.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/d_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-04-22_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 37850.569222 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24504.0, right_median=28262.5) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-04-22_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:

fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits


fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits


Updating neverexclude_list.txt '/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt' Choosing bad regions list '/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst' wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461171.69688171 Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt '../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt '../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt '../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt' Plate-solving the images Entering WCS image calibration mode. Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits Entering WCS image calibration mode. Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits was not set. Trying to guess... The guess is 605 arcmin. It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits was not set. Trying to guess... The guess is 605 arcmin. It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits was not set. Trying to guess... No image with WCS calibration found for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits .... Determining astrometry method... The guess is 573 arcmin. No image with WCS calibration found for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits .... Determining astrometry method... Using the local copy of Astrometry.net software... It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Using the local copy of Astrometry.net software... Catalog wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits was not found. Choosing aperture... Choosing aperture... Using the catalog image00004.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits Using the catalog image00003.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits verification OK: wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits was not set. Trying to guess... The guess is 573 arcmin. /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/lib/make_outxyls_for_astrometric_calibration found 5643 high-SNR stars for plate solving /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/lib/make_outxyls_for_astrometric_calibration found 5629 high-SNR stars for plate solving WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits was not found. verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits This service uses tools provided by Astrometry.net. For more information visit http://astrometry.net/ Generating wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits.cat from image00001.cat This service uses tools provided by Astrometry.net. For more information visit http://astrometry.net/ ######### Trying to solve plate assuming 605' field of view ######### /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits Using the local copy of Astrometry.net code verification OK: wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits ######### Trying to solve plate assuming 605' field of view ######### /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits Using the local copy of Astrometry.net code IMAGE_SIZE= --width 9576 --height 6388 SCALE_LOW=544.5 SCALE_HIGH=3025.0 Using solve-field binary /usr/local/astrometry/bin/solve-field Reading input file 1 of 1: "out3975169.xyls"... IMAGE_SIZE= --width 9576 --height 6388 SCALE_LOW=544.5 SCALE_HIGH=3025.0 Using solve-field binary /usr/local/astrometry/bin/solve-field Reading input file 1 of 1: "out3975165.xyls"... Catalog wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits created. verification OK: wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits Generating wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits.cat from image00002.cat Catalog wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits created. verification OK: wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits verification OK: wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits verification OK: wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits Image size: 941.7'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 10:09:14.835 +22:00:04.34 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ### Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 10:09:14.104 +22:00:00.95 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ### ### Converted positions of 6968 stars ### 'wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log' '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3975549.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log' The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits ### Converted positions of 6793 stars ### 'wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log' '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3975635.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log' The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits Reading sort column "FLUX_APER" Sorting sort column mmapping input file Copying table header. Writing row 0 Done Solving... Reading file "./out3975165.axy"... Field 1 did not solve (index index-4119.fits, field objects 1-10). Reading sort column "FLUX_APER" Sorting sort column mmapping input file Copying table header. Writing row 0 Done Solving... Field 1 did not solve (index index-4118.fits, field objects 1-10). Field 1 did not solve (index index-4117.fits, field objects 1-10). Reading file "./out3975169.axy"... log-odds ratio 160.847 (7.16227e+69), 15 match, 0 conflict, 7 distractors, 22 index. RA,Dec = (152.305,22.0518), pixel scale 5.9846 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -+-+++-++++++-+++--+-+(best)------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Field 1 did not solve (index index-4119.fits, field objects 1-10). Field 1 did not solve (index index-4118.fits, field objects 1-10). Field 1 did not solve (index index-4117.fits, field objects 1-10). log-odds ratio 160.421 (4.67504e+69), 15 match, 0 conflict, 7 distractors, 23 index. RA,Dec = (152.294,22.0435), pixel scale 5.98465 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -+-+++-++++++-+++--+-+(best)------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Field 1: solved with index index-4116.fits. Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out3975165.solved to indicate this. Field 1: solved with index index-4116.fits. Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out3975169.solved to indicate this. Field: out3975165.xyls Field center: (RA,Dec) = (152.304865, 22.053097) deg. Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (10:09:13.168, +22:03:11.151). Field size: 15.7923 x 10.5724 degrees Field rotation angle: up is -176.48 degrees E of N Field parity: neg Inserting WCS header... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits' -> 'fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits' Field: out3975169.xyls Field center: (RA,Dec) = (152.293834, 22.044861) deg. Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (10:09:10.520, +22:02:41.501). Field size: 15.7925 x 10.5724 degrees Field rotation angle: up is -176.48 degrees E of N Field parity: neg Inserting WCS header... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits' -> 'fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits' WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file. -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M May 10 23:46 fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K May 10 23:46 out3975165.wcs Inserting WCS header (1st iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits for reading... done! Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits)... done! WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file. -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M May 10 23:46 fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K May 10 23:46 out3975169.wcs Inserting WCS header (1st iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits for reading... done! Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits)... done! done! done! All done! done The WCS header appears to be added with no errors in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits (fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits) Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST004 = 'iteration01' / astrometry.net run All done! done The WCS header appears to be added with no errors in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits (fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits) Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST004 = 'iteration01' / astrometry.net run Reading input file 1 of 1: "out3975169.xyls"... Reading input file 1 of 1: "out3975165.xyls"... Reading sort column "FLUX_APER" Sorting sort column mmapping input file Copying table header. Writing row 0 Done Solving... Reading sort column "FLUX_APER" Sorting sort column mmapping input file Copying table header. Writing row 0 Done Solving... Reading file "./out3975169.axy"... Only searching for solutions within 15.7217 degrees of RA,Dec (152.293,22.0441) log-odds ratio 160.421 (4.67504e+69), 15 match, 0 conflict, 7 distractors, 23 index. RA,Dec = (152.294,22.0435), pixel scale 5.98465 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -+-+++-++++++-+++--+-+(best)------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Reading file "./out3975165.axy"... Only searching for solutions within 15.7217 degrees of RA,Dec (152.304,22.0523) log-odds ratio 160.847 (7.16227e+69), 15 match, 0 conflict, 7 distractors, 22 index. RA,Dec = (152.305,22.0518), pixel scale 5.9846 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -+-+++-++++++-+++--+-+(best)------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Field 1: solved with index index-4116.fits. Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out3975169.solved to indicate this. Field 1: solved with index index-4116.fits. Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out3975165.solved to indicate this. Field: out3975169.xyls Field center: (RA,Dec) = (152.291405, 22.043691) deg. Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (10:09:09.937, +22:02:37.286). Field size: 15.7762 x 10.574 degrees Field rotation angle: up is -176.467 degrees E of N Field parity: neg Field: out3975165.xyls Field center: (RA,Dec) = (152.302453, 22.051947) deg. Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (10:09:12.589, +22:03:07.008). Field size: 15.7761 x 10.574 degrees Field rotation angle: up is -176.467 degrees E of N Field parity: neg WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file. -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M May 10 23:46 fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K May 10 23:46 out3975169.wcs Inserting WCS header (2nd iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits for reading... done! Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits)... done! WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file. -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M May 10 23:46 fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K May 10 23:46 out3975165.wcs Inserting WCS header (2nd iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits for reading... done! Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits)... done! done! done! All done! The WCS header appears to be added with no errors. Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST004 = 'iteration02' / astrometry.net run The field of view is large: we'll try to run Astromety.net code on the image itself rather than a star list Reading input file "wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits"... Found an existing WCS header, will try to verify it. Extracting sources... All done! The WCS header appears to be added with no errors. Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST004 = 'iteration02' / astrometry.net run The field of view is large: we'll try to run Astromety.net code on the image itself rather than a star list Reading input file "wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits"... Found an existing WCS header, will try to verify it. Extracting sources... simplexy: found 25440 sources. simplexy: found 25425 sources. Solving... Solving... Reading file "./wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.axy"... Verifying WCS using indices with quads of size [63.7436, 955.556] arcmin Reading file "./wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0118.axy"... Verifying WCS using indices with quads of size [63.7437, 955.557] arcmin Verifying WCS with index 39 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4117.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. --> log-odds 0 Verifying WCS with index 40 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4116.fits) Verifying WCS with index 39 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4117.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 80.0441 (5.79033e+34), 21 match, 0 conflict, 348 distractors, 22 index. RA,Dec = (152.292,22.0445), pixel scale 5.98719 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -+--------------------+-----+---+--+------------------------------------------------+----+---------+ Verifying WCS of field 1. --> log-odds 0 Verifying WCS with index 40 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4116.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 48.3194 (9.65704e+20), 20 match, 0 conflict, 390 distractors, 22 index. RA,Dec = (152.303,22.0527), pixel scale 5.9872 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ----+-----------------+---------+----------+-------------------------------++--------------+-------- --> log-odds 80.0441 Verifying WCS with index 41 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4115.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 327.785 (2.26585e+142), 42 match, 0 conflict, 327 distractors, 43 index. RA,Dec = (152.292,22.0445), pixel scale 5.98719 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -+-----------------+--+-----+---+--+--------------++-------+-+----------------------+----+-------+-+ --> log-odds 48.3194 Verifying WCS with index 41 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4115.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 304.131 (1.20884e+132), 41 match, 0 conflict, 369 distractors, 43 index. RA,Dec = (152.303,22.0527), pixel scale 5.9872 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ----+-----------------+---------+---------++-+--------------------+++------++-------------+++------+ --> log-odds 304.131 Verifying WCS with index 42 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4114.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 714.653 (inf), 80 match, 0 conflict, 402 distractors, 82 index. RA,Dec = (152.303,22.0527), pixel scale 5.9872 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ---++-------------+---+----+-+--+-----+---++++--+----+----------+-+++------++--++-+--+----+++------+ --> log-odds 327.785 Verifying WCS with index 42 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4114.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 733.27 (inf), 81 match, 0 conflict, 345 distractors, 82 index. RA,Dec = (152.292,22.0445), pixel scale 5.98719 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -+----------------++--+-+---+---+--+-++----+------++-------+-+--+--------++--+------+--+-++------+-+ --> log-odds 714.653 Verifying WCS with index 43 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4113.fits) --> log-odds 733.27 Verifying WCS with index 43 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4113.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 1749.67 (inf), 184 match, 0 conflict, 298 distractors, 189 index. RA,Dec = (152.303,22.0527), pixel scale 5.9872 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -++++-+++--++-++--++++++--++++++++--+-++--++++-++-+++++++-+---+++-+++-+---++++-++-+--+++-++++---++++ Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 1769.63 (inf), 185 match, 0 conflict, 241 distractors, 189 index. RA,Dec = (152.292,22.0445), pixel scale 5.98719 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -+++++-++-----++--++--+++++++++++-++-+++--+++-++--++--++-+-+-++-+--++-++++++-+---++-+--+++++-+-+++-+ --> log-odds 1749.67 Verifying WCS with index 44 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4112.fits) --> log-odds 1769.63 Verifying WCS with index 44 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4112.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 3269.93 (inf), 360 match, 0 conflict, 507 distractors, 366 index. RA,Dec = (152.303,22.0527), pixel scale 5.9872 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -++++-+++++++++++++++++++-+++++++++++++++++++++++-++++++++++--+++++++-+-+++++++++++++++++++++-++++++ Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 3297.05 (inf), 362 match, 0 conflict, 594 distractors, 367 index. RA,Dec = (152.292,22.0445), pixel scale 5.98719 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -+++++-++++++++++++++++++++++++++-+++++++-+++++++-++-+++++++-++-++++++++++++-++-+++++-++++++++++++++ --> log-odds 3269.93 Verifying WCS with index 45 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4111.fits) --> log-odds 3297.05 Verifying WCS with index 45 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4111.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 6009.96 (inf), 712 match, 0 conflict, 1261 distractors, 723 index. RA,Dec = (152.303,22.0527), pixel scale 5.9872 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ log-odds ratio 6059.18 (inf), 715 match, 0 conflict, 1338 distractors, 724 index. RA,Dec = (152.292,22.0445), pixel scale 5.98719 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ --> log-odds 6009.96 Verifying WCS with index 46 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4110.fits) --> log-odds 6059.18 Verifying WCS with index 46 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4110.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 11079.1 (inf), 1434 match, 1 conflict, 2517 distractors, 1453 index. RA,Dec = (152.303,22.0527), pixel scale 5.9872 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 11138.4 (inf), 1438 match, 1 conflict, 2577 distractors, 1455 index. RA,Dec = (152.292,22.0445), pixel scale 5.98719 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ --> log-odds 11079.1 --> log-odds 11138.4 Got 7 solutions. Got 7 solutions. Field: wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits Field center: (RA,Dec) = (152.301480, 22.051945) deg. Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (10:09:12.355, +22:03:07.003). Field size: 15.7752 x 10.575 degrees Field rotation angle: up is -176.479 degrees E of N Field parity: neg Creating new FITS file "./wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0118.new"... Field: wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits Field center: (RA,Dec) = (152.290447, 22.043671) deg. Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (10:09:09.707, +22:02:37.214). Field size: 15.7753 x 10.5749 degrees Field rotation angle: up is -176.479 degrees E of N Field parity: neg Creating new FITS file "./wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.new"... renamed 'wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0118.new' -> 'wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits' renamed 'wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.new' -> 'wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits' Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits was not found. Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits was not found. verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits Generating wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits.cat from image00003.cat Generating wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits.cat from image00004.cat Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits created. verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits created. verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits Image size: 941.5'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 10:09:09.479 +22:02:34.41 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ### Image size: 941.5'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 10:09:12.127 +22:03:04.20 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ### ### Converted positions of 5854 stars ### 'wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log' ### Converted positions of 5860 stars ### '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3979860.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log' 'wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log' The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3979851.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log' The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits' wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits' wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits' wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits' ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits Image size: 941.7'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 10:09:14.835 +22:00:04.34 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits Image size: 941.5'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 10:09:12.127 +22:03:04.20 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 10:09:14.835 +22:00:04.34 Second-epoch image center 10:09:12.127 +22:03:04.20 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0510 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits Image size: 941.5'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 10:09:09.479 +22:02:34.41 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 10:09:14.835 +22:00:04.34 Second-epoch image center 10:09:09.479 +22:02:34.41 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0465 deg. ################################### ################################### # Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above) ref1=wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A ref2=wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A new1=wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A new2=wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A reference average sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference ################################### INFO: WCS quality sigma_overall_arcsec not available for comparison (1st new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A) INFO: WCS quality sigma_overall_arcsec not available for comparison (2nd new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A) INFO: WCS quality worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio not available for comparison (1st new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A) INFO: WCS quality worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio not available for comparison (2nd new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A) ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 10:09:12.127 +22:03:04.20 Second-epoch second image center 10:09:09.479 +22:02:34.41 Angular distance between the image centers 0.01316 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for ar aprallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits &> /tmp/tmp.i7Tlb5nusF Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits &> /tmp/tmp.dd1bEBc1CH Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits &> /tmp/tmp.LB8DZNkPTE Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits &> /tmp/tmp.kKLmoJajWt Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits and wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits.cat Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits and wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits.cat Found non-empty wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits and wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits.cat The reference image (wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits) and catalog (wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits.cat) found 'wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 6968 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 143.3687 to 160.8868 deg, Dec +16.3927 to +27.3357 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 143.3687 to 160.8868 deg, Dec 16.3927 to 27.3357 deg Loaded 4674 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3606 out of 3801 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3801 out of 6968 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.905550 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.905550 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.46 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.45 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.45
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 6968 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 143.3687 to 160.8868 deg, Dec +16.3927 to +27.3357 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 143.3687 to 160.8868 deg, Dec 16.3927 to 27.3357 deg Loaded 4674 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3606 out of 3801 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3801 out of 6968 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits (aperture=6.1) Read 6793 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 143.3688 to 160.8867 deg, Dec +16.3928 to +27.3358 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 143.3688 to 160.8867 deg, Dec 16.3928 to 27.3358 deg Loaded 4674 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3603 out of 3798 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3798 out of 6793 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits (aperture=6.4) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 4 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.0 pix Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits 2.2 pix Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits 2.5 pix fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits 2.5 pix fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits 2.0 pix wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits 2.2 pix wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.4 mag. Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits 15.4 mag. Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits 15.1 mag. fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits 15.1 mag. fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.1 (SNR ) 12.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.i7Tlb5nusF (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=467, passed=6968 Got 6968 stars (including 6491 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6968 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.4 to 27.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 910 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 904 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6899 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.4 to 27.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 910 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6897 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6897 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Excluding outliers - 909 stars left (next iteration limit 999) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits N_match=909 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.316 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.369 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.340 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.313 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.259 n_q1=242 n_q2=222 n_q3=230 n_q4=215 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.169 The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits -region wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.dd1bEBc1CH (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=460, passed=6793 Got 6793 stars (including 6327 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6793 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.4 to 27.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 909 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 904 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6708 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.4 to 27.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 909 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6707 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6707 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Excluding outliers - 908 stars left (next iteration limit 998) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits N_match=908 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.371 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.439 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.340 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.340 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.369 n_q1=243 n_q2=222 n_q3=231 n_q4=212 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.184 The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits -region wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.LB8DZNkPTE (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=396, passed=5860 Got 5860 stars (including 5458 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5860 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 907 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 901 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5803 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 907 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5800 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5800 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" Excluding outliers - 907 stars left (next iteration limit 997) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits N_match=907 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.434 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.464 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.460 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.389 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.379 n_q1=217 n_q2=234 n_q3=212 n_q4=244 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.070 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.kKLmoJajWt (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=415, passed=5854 Got 5854 stars (including 5436 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5854 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 908 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 900 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5788 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 908 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5786 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5786 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" Excluding outliers - 908 stars left (next iteration limit 998) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits N_match=908 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.435 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.507 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.488 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.377 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.381 n_q1=215 n_q2=234 n_q3=217 n_q4=242 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.167 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits' Preparing the HTML report for the field Leo-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits at 10:33:19.90 +26:23:03.9: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits at 10:33:08.18 +23:45:46.4: 15.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 10:33:19.90 +26:23:03.9: 15.77 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 10:33:08.18 +23:45:46.4: 15.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20439.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20544.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 5s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20439_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119 Preparing report for the candidate 20439_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20467_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119 The candidate 20467_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 11.19767    2461171.69767    11.98    10:07:32.26 +22:06:36.4   5017 3168   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits **** FOUND 10:07:32.26 +22:06:36.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20544_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119 Preparing report for the candidate 20544_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 02295_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119 The candidate 02295_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 11.19767    2461171.69767    9.53    09:43:25.76 +19:51:40.8   8366 4662   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits **** FOUND 09:43:25.75 +19:51:40.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 7s Prepared the HTML report for the field Leo-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### 10:33:19.90 +26:23:03.9 10:33:08.18 +23:45:46.4 wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images Plate-solving the images Entering WCS image calibration mode. Entering WCS image calibration mode. Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits Entering WCS image calibration mode. FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits was not set. Trying to guess... The guess is 605 arcmin. It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits was not set. Trying to guess... The guess is 605 arcmin. WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits was not found. It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits was not found. It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits was not set. Trying to guess... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits was not set. Trying to guess... The guess is 573 arcmin. The guess is 573 arcmin. WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits was not found. WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits was not found. verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits verification OK: wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits verification OK: wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits Generating wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits.cat from image00004.cat Generating wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits.cat from image00003.cat Generating wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits.cat from image00002.cat Generating wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits.cat from image00001.cat Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits created. verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits created. verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits Catalog wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits created. verification OK: wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits Catalog wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits created. verification OK: wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits verification OK: wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits verification OK: wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits Image size: 941.5'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 10:09:09.479 +22:02:34.41 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ### Image size: 941.5'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 10:09:12.127 +22:03:04.20 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 Image size: 941.7'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 10:09:14.835 +22:00:04.34 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ### ### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ### Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 10:09:14.104 +22:00:00.95 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ### ### Converted positions of 32305 stars ### ### Converted positions of 32267 stars ### ### Converted positions of 37822 stars ### 'wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log' ### Converted positions of 36566 stars ### 'wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log' '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3989432.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log' The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits 'wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log' '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3989441.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log' The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits 'wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log' '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3989462.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log' The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3989452.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log' The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits Image size: 941.7'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 10:09:14.835 +22:00:04.34 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits Image size: 941.5'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 10:09:12.127 +22:03:04.20 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 10:09:14.835 +22:00:04.34 Second-epoch image center 10:09:12.127 +22:03:04.20 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0510 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits Image size: 941.5'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 10:09:09.479 +22:02:34.41 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 10:09:14.835 +22:00:04.34 Second-epoch image center 10:09:09.479 +22:02:34.41 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0465 deg. ################################### ################################### # Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above) ref1=wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A ref2=wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A new1=wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A new2=wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A reference average sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference ################################### INFO: WCS quality sigma_overall_arcsec not available for comparison (1st new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A) INFO: WCS quality sigma_overall_arcsec not available for comparison (2nd new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A) INFO: WCS quality worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio not available for comparison (1st new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A) INFO: WCS quality worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio not available for comparison (2nd new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A) ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 10:09:12.127 +22:03:04.20 Second-epoch second image center 10:09:09.479 +22:02:34.41 Angular distance between the image centers 0.01316 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for ar aprallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits &> /tmp/tmp.7Wpvev16DO Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits &> /tmp/tmp.EEN9pjdqev Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits &> /tmp/tmp.P1X5KJPtgt Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits &> /tmp/tmp.1NU2ej4ZUd Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits and wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits.cat Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits and wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits.cat Found non-empty wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits and wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits.cat The reference image (wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits) and catalog (wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits.cat) found 'wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 37822 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 143.3687 to 160.9043 deg, Dec +16.3249 to +27.3468 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 143.3687 to 160.9043 deg, Dec 16.3249 to 27.3468 deg Loaded 4718 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3458 out of 3819 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3819 out of 37822 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.809000 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.809000 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.23 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.58 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.58
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 37822 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 143.3687 to 160.9043 deg, Dec +16.3249 to +27.3468 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 143.3687 to 160.9043 deg, Dec 16.3249 to 27.3468 deg Loaded 4718 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3458 out of 3819 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3819 out of 37822 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits (aperture=4.9) Read 36566 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 143.3688 to 160.9045 deg, Dec +16.3177 to +27.3431 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 143.3688 to 160.9045 deg, Dec 16.3177 to 27.3431 deg Loaded 4721 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3449 out of 3818 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3818 out of 36566 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits (aperture=5.0) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 28 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 1.9 pix Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits 2.1 pix Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits 2.2 pix fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits 2.2 pix fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits 1.9 pix wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits 2.1 pix wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.6 mag. Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits 15.5 mag. Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits 15.2 mag. fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits 15.2 mag. fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.2 (SNR ) 14.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.7Wpvev16DO (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=17, blended=1597, passed=37805 Got 37805 stars (including 36130 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 37805 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 903 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 902 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 896 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 902 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37297 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 903 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 902 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37296 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 902 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37296 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Excluding outliers - 902 stars left (next iteration limit 992) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits N_match=902 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.316 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.342 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.337 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.330 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.250 n_q1=244 n_q2=223 n_q3=228 n_q4=207 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.082 The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits -region wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.EEN9pjdqev (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=20, blended=1590, passed=36546 Got 36546 stars (including 34883 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 36546 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 903 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 902 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 894 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 902 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36033 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 903 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 902 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36033 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 902 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36033 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Excluding outliers - 902 stars left (next iteration limit 992) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits N_match=902 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.402 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.330 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.344 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.337 n_q1=244 n_q2=221 n_q3=229 n_q4=208 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.128 The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits -region wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.P1X5KJPtgt (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=1381, passed=32254 Got 32254 stars (including 30819 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 32254 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 900 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 900 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 890 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 900 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31857 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 900 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 900 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31857 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 900 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31857 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" Excluding outliers - 900 stars left (next iteration limit 990) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits N_match=900 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.426 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.423 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.495 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.395 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.397 n_q1=217 n_q2=232 n_q3=213 n_q4=238 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.160 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.1NU2ej4ZUd (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=31, blended=1405, passed=32274 Got 32274 stars (including 30813 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 32274 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 899 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 899 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 889 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 899 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31868 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 899 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 899 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31869 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 899 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31869 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" Excluding outliers - 899 stars left (next iteration limit 988) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits N_match=899 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.422 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.475 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.454 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.348 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.371 n_q1=214 n_q2=228 n_q3=216 n_q4=241 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.125 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits Preparing the HTML report for the field Leo-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits at 10:14:00.16 +25:34:36.6: 14.44 +/- 0.07 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits at 10:28:22.59 +17:41:33.0: 12.90 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits at 09:40:45.35 +21:41:22.7: 14.13 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits at 10:10:33.61 +27:08:37.6: 14.50 +/- 0.07 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits at 09:50:58.51 +27:03:34.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits at 10:28:16.09 +25:25:36.1: 15.36 +/- 0.18 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 10:28:16.09 +25:25:36.1: 15.09 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 09:50:58.51 +27:03:34.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:50:58.51 +27:03:34.7: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 09:40:45.35 +21:41:22.7: 13.94 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 10:28:22.59 +17:41:33.0: 12.95 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 10:14:00.16 +25:34:36.6: 14.46 +/- 0.08 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.20 +/- 0.11 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:28:16.09 +25:25:36.1: ref_mag=15.20 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.8093 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 10:10:33.61 +27:08:37.6: 14.50 +/- 0.08 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.02 +/- 0.04 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.92 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.45 +/- 0.05 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:40:45.35 +21:41:22.7: ref_mag=14.02 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.4204 delta=-0.40 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:28:22.59 +17:41:33.0: ref_mag=12.92 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.0446 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.50 +/- 0.06 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:14:00.16 +25:34:36.6: ref_mag=14.45 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.6147 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:10:33.61 +27:08:37.6: ref_mag=14.50 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.5494 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits at 10:31:18.40 +22:27:39.1: 16.16 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits at 09:59:49.53 +21:57:06.7: 14.25 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits at 09:48:13.79 +23:29:47.1: 16.21 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits at 10:23:35.56 +20:17:07.2: 14.75 +/- 0.09 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 10:31:18.40 +22:27:39.1: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 09:59:49.53 +21:57:06.7: 14.19 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.22 +/- 0.04 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:59:49.53 +21:57:06.7: ref_mag=14.22 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.4609 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits at 10:23:26.57 +26:28:38.3: 14.74 +/- 0.10 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits at 10:37:13.12 +25:31:04.0: 14.97 +/- 0.14 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits at 10:09:34.86 +27:04:17.6: 14.89 +/- 0.13 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits at 10:28:16.43 +25:05:34.9: 15.18 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 09:48:13.79 +23:29:47.1: 16.13 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 10:23:35.56 +20:17:07.2: 14.84 +/- 0.11 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.78 +/- 0.07 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:23:35.56 +20:17:07.2: ref_mag=14.78 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.5814 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits at 09:41:31.26 +25:53:16.0: 14.95 +/- 0.16 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 10:23:26.57 +26:28:38.3: 14.63 +/- 0.10 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 10:37:13.12 +25:31:04.0: 15.16 +/- 0.17 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 10:09:34.86 +27:04:17.6: 15.00 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 10:28:16.43 +25:05:34.9: 15.12 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.04 +/- 0.11 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.69 +/- 0.07 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.94 +/- 0.10 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:37:13.12 +25:31:04.0: ref_mag=15.04 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.8020 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:23:26.57 +26:28:38.3: ref_mag=14.69 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.6298 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.15 +/- 0.11 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:09:34.86 +27:04:17.6: ref_mag=14.94 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.7737 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:28:16.43 +25:05:34.9: ref_mag=15.15 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.8358 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 09:41:31.26 +25:53:16.0: 14.85 +/- 0.16 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.90 +/- 0.11 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:41:31.26 +25:53:16.0: ref_mag=14.90 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.7707 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90) Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52788.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53141.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 6s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 51850_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119 The candidate 51850_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 11.19688    2461171.69688    14.94    10:28:16.04 +25:25:36.6   2320 0957   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 11.19767    2461171.69767    14.74    10:28:16.14 +25:25:35.7   2314 0952   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 51854_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119 The candidate 51854_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 11.19688    2461171.69688    14.61    10:14:00.21 +25:34:36.1   4268 1031   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 11.19767    2461171.69767    14.62    10:14:00.11 +25:34:37.0   4263 1026   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 51856_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119 The candidate 51856_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 11.19688    2461171.69688    14.58    10:10:33.58 +27:08:37.8   4796 0114   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 11.19767    2461171.69767    14.52    10:10:33.64 +27:08:37.4   4790 0109   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 51858_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119 The candidate 51858_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 11.19688    2461171.69688    14.41    09:40:45.31 +21:41:22.9   8773 3566   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 11.19767    2461171.69767    14.43    09:40:45.39 +21:41:22.4   8767 3561   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 51864_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119 The candidate 51864_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 11.19767    2461171.69767    13.96    10:34:00.75 +22:55:44.9   1375 2377   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits **** FOUND 10:34:00.74 +22:55:45.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 51866_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119 The candidate 51866_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 11.19767    2461171.69767    13.32    10:25:42.12 +26:39:26.3   2730 0240   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits **** FOUND 10:25:42.14 +26:39:26.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 51867_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119 The candidate 51867_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 11.19688    2461171.69688    13.25    10:28:22.65 +17:41:32.1   1869 5617   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 11.19767    2461171.69767    12.94    10:28:22.53 +17:41:33.8   1863 5612   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52024_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119 The candidate 52024_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 11.19767    2461171.69767    11.83    10:33:19.88 +26:23:03.6   1679 0299   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits **** FOUND 10:33:19.88 +26:23:03.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52026_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119 The candidate 52026_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 11.19688    2461171.69688    11.75    09:50:58.52 +27:03:34.6   7432 0281   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 11.19767    2461171.69767    11.75    09:50:58.49 +27:03:34.9   7426 0275   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52138_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119 The candidate 52138_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 11.19767    2461171.69767    12.40    10:33:08.16 +23:45:46.4   1548 1887   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits **** FOUND 10:33:08.16 +23:45:46.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52193_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119 The candidate 52193_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 11.19767    2461171.69767    12.69    10:43:27.29 +24:48:03.0   0181 1094   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits **** FOUND 10:43:27.29 +24:48:03.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52743_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119 The candidate 52743_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 11.19767    2461171.69767    13.72    09:39:00.24 +26:15:37.2   9052 0783   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits **** FOUND 09:39:00.25 +26:15:37.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52760_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119 The candidate 52760_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 11.19767    2461171.69767    14.03    09:46:05.94 +20:49:41.7   7996 4067   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits **** FOUND 09:46:06.04 +20:49:41.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52764_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119 The candidate 52764_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 11.19767    2461171.69767    13.93    09:36:22.36 +26:14:14.0   9417 0796   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits **** FOUND 09:36:22.37 +26:14:14.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52788_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119 Preparing report for the candidate 52788_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52832_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119 The candidate 52832_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 11.19767    2461171.69767    14.13    10:36:21.09 +26:26:19.8   1271 0219   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits **** FOUND 10:36:21.19 +26:26:20.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52953_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119 The candidate 52953_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 11.19767    2461171.69767    14.22    09:40:35.82 +23:33:51.5   8806 2424   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits **** FOUND 09:40:35.82 +23:33:51.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53140_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119 The candidate 53140_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 11.19688    2461171.69688    14.45    09:59:49.56 +21:57:06.9   6092 3325   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 11.19767    2461171.69767    14.47    09:59:49.51 +21:57:06.5   6086 3320   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53141_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119 Preparing report for the candidate 53141_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53293_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119 The candidate 53293_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 11.19688    2461171.69688    14.58    10:23:35.63 +20:17:08.0   2694 4109   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 11.19767    2461171.69767    14.58    10:23:35.48 +20:17:06.4   2689 4104   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53311_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119 The candidate 53311_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 11.19688    2461171.69688    14.75    10:37:13.10 +25:31:03.3   1099 0770   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 11.19767    2461171.69767    14.88    10:37:13.14 +25:31:04.7   1093 0764   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53325_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119 The candidate 53325_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 11.19688    2461171.69688    14.69    10:23:26.68 +26:28:36.2   3032 0384   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 11.19767    2461171.69767    14.59    10:23:26.46 +26:28:40.4   3026 0378   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53328_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119 The candidate 53328_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 11.19688    2461171.69688    14.73    10:28:16.43 +25:05:34.5   2301 1159   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 11.19767    2461171.69767    15.03    10:28:16.44 +25:05:35.3   2295 1153   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53374_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119 The candidate 53374_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 11.19688    2461171.69688    14.77    10:09:34.85 +27:04:17.6   4924 0167   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 11.19767    2461171.69767    14.78    10:09:34.87 +27:04:17.6   4918 0162   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53398_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119 The candidate 53398_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 11.19767    2461171.69767    14.75    10:43:20.53 +23:31:56.3   0107 1864   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits **** FOUND 10:43:20.47 +23:31:55.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53430_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119 The candidate 53430_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 11.19767    2461171.69767    14.93    10:37:33.59 +20:25:02.9   0712 3839   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits **** FOUND 10:37:33.77 +20:25:01.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53557_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119 The candidate 53557_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 11.19688    2461171.69688    14.87    09:41:31.20 +25:53:15.5   8707 1014   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-43-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 11.19767    2461171.69767    14.72    09:41:31.32 +25:53:16.5   8701 1009   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 12081_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119 The candidate 12081_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 05 11.19767    2461171.69767    9.58    09:43:25.74 +19:51:40.2   8366 4662   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_234519_TTUQ1b1x1_3960090_ChND5cEn/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-44-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0119.fits **** FOUND 09:43:25.74 +19:51:40.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 7s Prepared the HTML report for the field Leo-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### 10:33:19.90 +26:23:03.9 10:33:08.18 +23:45:46.4 10:31:18.40 +22:27:39.1 09:48:13.79 +23:29:47.1 ########### Completed Leo-02-Q1b1x1 ########### The analysis was running at tau We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt #### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources #### 10:33:19.90 +26:23:03.9 10:33:08.18 +23:45:46.4 10:31:18.40 +22:27:39.1 09:48:13.79 +23:29:47.1 ################################################################################### 10:33:19.90 +26:23:03.9 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) 10:33:08.18 +23:45:46.4 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) 10:31:18.40 +22:27:39.1 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) 09:48:13.79 +23:29:47.1 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' # Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix) Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars). ################################################################################### 0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels) This does not look like a test run ################################################################################### exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES #### Nothing to add to the exclusion list #### The observatory MPC code is V36 ############################################################ Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461171.69688171 -observatory V36 02:54:59.96 +16:13:14.0 Mercury (-1.9mag) 05:17:00.63 +24:23:30.3 Venus (-3.9mag) 01:29:15.71 +08:28:26.4 Mars (1.2mag) 07:27:04.93 +22:19:45.7 Jupiter (-2.0mag) 00:39:48.21 +01:53:46.5 Saturn (0.9mag) 03:53:26.03 +20:05:24.1 Uranus (5.8mag) 00:13:49.92 +00:03:11.5 Neptune (7.8mag) 20:34:14.07 -22:56:01.8 Pluto (14.5mag) 22:31:22.62 -09:51:47.4 Moon (-10.0mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 363 May 10 23:46 planets.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461171.69688171: 07:27:12.38 +22:19:28.4 Io (5.9mag) 07:27:13.53 +22:19:26.1 Europa (6.1mag) 07:26:49.90 +22:20:25.8 Ganymede (5.5mag) 07:26:33.52 +22:21:00.5 Callisto (6.7mag) 07:29:04.71 +21:58:26.6 Himalia (15.5mag) 07:27:01.90 +22:19:54.0 Thebe (16.4mag) 07:29:32.88 +22:25:24.5 Elara (17.4mag) 07:27:38.02 +22:46:31.6 Pasiphae (17.6mag) 07:34:43.68 +22:19:40.9 Carme (18.7mag) 00:39:54.75 +01:53:29.9 Titan (8.7mag) 00:39:50.83 +01:53:59.3 Rhea (10.0mag) 00:39:35.98 +01:51:48.8 Iapetus (11.4mag) 00:39:41.89 +01:54:14.6 Hyperion (14.7mag) 00:41:02.09 +01:59:34.2 Phoebe (16.8mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 569 May 10 23:46 moons.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461171.69688171: 16:57:58.18 -29:10:25.7 JWST 18:01:24.24 +35:00:28.8 Chandra 18:12:10.29 -33:55:53.8 XMM-Newton -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 May 10 23:46 spacecraft.txt ############################################################ Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461171.69688171 -observatory V36 -> Warning: Longitude 255.61742 is outside valid range [-180, 180] 07:40:49.21 +25:55:11.0 17.7mag P/2009 WX51 (Catalina) 18:55:30.87 -30:29:15.2 13.7mag P/2010 H2 (Vales) 05:27:06.96 -68:39:37.1 17.4mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein) 05:39:18.27 +31:38:52.3 17.4mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS) 17:25:05.69 +13:16:54.2 17.7mag C/2021 G2 (ATLAS) 23:14:34.19 +30:21:02.8 17.2mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS) 04:59:31.60 +26:37:31.9 16.2mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS) 09:12:31.98 +31:50:31.4 16.4mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS) 08:37:45.50 +02:10:11.0 17.5mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS) 18:44:29.76 +20:25:02.9 17.6mag C/2023 A3 (Tsuchinshan-ATLAS) 15:30:50.89 -11:10:17.4 17.5mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS) 09:00:24.51 -08:19:13.0 17.9mag C/2023 F3 (ATLAS) 22:12:30.72 +64:35:05.8 17.6mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon) 18:46:47.63 -04:33:24.9 13.8mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS) 16:13:08.94 +88:10:19.1 17.9mag C/2023 X2 (Lemmon) 06:36:47.66 +63:38:07.3 17.4mag C/2024 A1 (ATLAS) 06:01:41.43 +24:20:17.3 12.5mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos) 16:00:24.38 +10:17:21.4 17.3mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS) 20:23:20.56 +22:34:10.5 14.3mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS) 03:50:08.23 -18:54:44.4 16.2mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS) 05:39:29.55 +39:41:23.4 17.8mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov) 12:12:22.74 +53:07:59.0 16.3mag C/2025 L1 (ATLAS) 05:34:55.28 -07:41:47.1 10.3mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS) 12:44:30.56 +04:14:37.6 17.3mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS) 05:25:40.03 +01:22:50.5 17.7mag C/2026 A1 (MAPS) 01:04:06.61 +40:52:43.6 15.3mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao) 19:31:27.82 -08:26:00.4 10.3mag 10P/Tempel 14:29:13.85 -00:10:21.9 16.3mag 24P/Schaumasse 10:59:02.83 -00:56:52.2 15.8mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 10:42:57.89 -02:44:57.0 17.4mag 43P/Wolf-Harrington 02:27:58.95 +21:35:37.3 17.4mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson 08:00:42.02 +31:13:09.4 16.9mag 63P/Wild 23:59:09.22 -08:40:43.7 15.7mag 65P/Gunn 05:15:09.88 +28:38:15.4 16.2mag 76P/West-Kohoutek-Ikemura 02:02:43.32 +12:56:11.8 14.1mag 78P/Gehrels 00:13:50.05 -02:06:19.4 15.0mag 88P/Howell 03:25:25.05 +26:29:50.3 15.1mag 93P/Lovas 05:46:18.42 +33:14:11.6 15.9mag 123P/West-Hartley 09:03:39.11 +26:53:45.3 16.3mag 124P/Mrkos 03:13:09.53 +16:58:36.1 16.4mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt 03:37:33.03 +17:10:19.7 17.6mag 131P/Mueller 03:42:04.27 +19:06:22.3 11.4mag 141P/Machholz 03:46:24.18 +13:16:35.8 11.3mag 141P-A/Machholz 02:26:40.08 +09:27:22.6 10.6mag 141P-D/Machholz 02:36:50.63 -29:15:50.7 17.8mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS 02:14:26.59 +11:07:49.3 14.9mag 162P/SidingSpring 17:12:22.57 -10:52:31.3 16.1mag 235P/LINEAR 06:30:45.23 +35:51:20.1 17.1mag 240P/NEAT 07:54:14.16 -02:55:13.4 18.0mag 242P/Spahr 23:20:17.15 -13:16:31.9 17.2mag 260P/McNaught 02:53:21.75 +26:35:43.6 17.8mag 295P/LINEAR 15:30:07.38 +08:12:08.4 17.4mag 391P/Kowalski 07:47:05.04 +21:15:48.8 17.8mag 450P/LONEOS 06:14:35.49 +43:32:23.7 17.7mag 493P/LONEOS -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.7K May 10 23:46 comets.txt ############################################################ List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html : 21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30 ASASSN-26de 2026-05-6.29 14.51 16:21:49.13 -61:36:14.60 ASASSN-26dd 2026-05-5.15 15.93 14:26:40.22 -24:48:37.50 AT2026lig 2026-05-4.27 14.63 13:17:51.04 +30:25:13.50 SN2026kcp 2026-05-4.46 16.43 11:27:55.57 -13:38:56.90 SN2026kza 2026-05-1.08 15.59 22:28:27.10 +30:17:54.30 SN 2026fov 2026-04-29.6 14.36 21:00:10.71 -32:17:03.90 AT2026kis 2026-04-27.36 16.15 14:32:57.37 -58:13:26.40 ASASSN-26dc 2026-04-27.27 13.42 15:32:05.35 -43:54:34.60 ASASSN-26db 2026-04-27.37 16.06 16:34:34.97 -54:34:58.00 ASASSN-26da 2026-04-25.32 16.11 10:06:55.04 -01:13:49.70 SN2026jsg 2026-04-24.99 16.28 15:15:57.17 +56:18:32.80 SN2026kid 2026-04-24.52 -3.65 07:58:28.45 +57:03:42.40 AT2026kcf 2026-04-24.2 16.89 11:38:21.80 -50:43:06.50 SN2026jkb 2026-04-24.24 15.38 10:06:11.41 -39:41:04.20 AT2026dil 2026-04-24.2 16.85 14:21:40.08 +13:13:46.30 SN2026jlm 2026-04-22.16 15.12 10:53:55.47 -16:06:07.00 ASASSN-26cz 2026-04-22.24 16.32 21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30 2026-05-6.29 14.51 13:45:02.03 +15:17:14.50 ASASSN-26cy 2026-04-21.27 15.78 13:20:52.22 -35:57:03.60 AT2026jcm 2026-04-19.01 16.65 13:36:15.66 -36:53:48.40 SN 2026iqy 2026-04-18.92 17.31 06:34:01.33 -40:07:34.00 ASASSN-26cx 2026-04-19.07 16.16 23:33:57.97 -45:12:11.90 SN 2026idu 2026-04-19.41 15.9 12:10:50.92 +66:55:31.20 SN 2026icv 2026-04-17.14 16.03 21:36:59.06 -60:43:35.90 ASASSN-26cv 2026-04-17.35 -1.18 08:13:26.26 -27:07:30.50 ASASSN-26cw 2026-04-17.07 -1.01 14:49:14.01 -27:29:20.10 ASASSN-26cu 2026-04-16.29 -2.7 17:21:59.44 -38:54:04.60 ASASSN-26ct 2026-04-14.4 15.15 15:25:54.99 +07:49:24.50 SN2026huo 2026-04-12.14 16.96 21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30 2026-05-6.29 14.51 12:23:20.40 +04:53:39.10 AT2026ixd 2026-04-12.14 17.65 17:46:09.76 -61:19:50.40 SN2026icy 2026-04-12.2 17.03 09:25:46.42 +02:13:46.30 SN2026gud 2026-04-11.98 16.49 16:52:15.46 -60:27:45.90 ASASSN-26cs 2026-04-12.4 15.5 04:20:55.37 -51:15:31.10 ASASSN-26cr 2026-04-12.01 15.37 22:25:39.35 +36:45:06.90 AT2026ihl 2026-04-10.48 14.21 19:40:44.94 +00:41:03.80 AT2026imw 2026-04-10.32 16.06 19:52:04.70 +05:53:33.50 ASASSN-26cq 2026-04-9.31 14.98 16:08:18.39 -64:11:08.80 ASASSN-26cp 2026-04-9.29 13.32 09:22:22.90 -61:02:43.70 SN2026idh 2026-04-7.97 16.34 05:06:54.12 -19:42:26.40 AT2026imr 2026-04-8 17.49 07:14:55.34 -36:03:21.40 AT2026hei 2026-04-8.12 16.7 21:35:33.14 -19:01:34.80 AT2026ihm 2026-04-8.36 16.7 04:28:24.08 -32:25:35.30 AT2026imo 2026-04-8.02 16.81 05:10:35.79 -39:38:40.80 SN 2026hnn 2026-04-7.04 17.07 09:54:32.04 -01:17:25.80 ASASSN-26cn 2026-04-7.01 15.58 07:46:24.43 -77:29:36.30 ASASSN-26co 2026-04-7.15 15.11 05:00:45.52 -29:51:06.20 AT2026hvw 2026-04-6.03 16.51 19:49:33.10 -23:37:11.00 ASASSN-26cl 2026-04-5.29 14.98 19:32:43.55 -22:39:33.40 ASASSN-26cm 2026-04-4.3 13.88 18:08:57.38 +76:48:23.60 ASASSN-26ck 2026-04-2.37 15.38 16:16:36.10 +44:52:30.20 AT2026hyy 2026-04-2.58 13.81 21:55:23.31 -34:48:53.90 ASASSN-26cj 2026-03-30.4 -1.47 11:19:50.81 -27:51:50.40 SN2026gvk 2026-03-30 15.28 11:53:57.02 -23:09:46.20 SN2026gzx 2026-03-28.75 15.27 07:13:46.14 -33:10:15.70 ASASSN-26ci 2026-03-28.15 15.14 09:03:36.09 -67:58:13.00 SN2026hkg 2026-03-28.19 15.82 07:03:00.72 +39:14:43.00 SN2026fin 2026-03-28.27 15.82 05:35:42.80 -63:44:05.50 ASASSN-26ch 2026-03-27.86 13.02 11:23:19.04 +34:22:38.00 SN2026fwt 2026-03-27.3 16.56 19:03:49.79 +37:04:05.20 ASASSN-26ce 2026-03-26.56 16.3 20:26:56.07 -52:54:06.50 AT2026hiy 2026-03-26.35 16.95 05:25:54.76 -30:15:35.80 ASASSN-26cg 2026-03-25.07 16.88 06:57:16.49 -26:54:37.20 SN2026fzb 2026-03-25.14 15.8 14:37:38.23 -43:00:52.30 ASASSN-26cd 2026-03-24.24 12.52 17:34:53.03 +06:04:29.70 AT2026gzl 2026-03-23.27 15.82 08:30:02.60 -35:12:47.50 ASASSN-26cf 2026-03-23.2 14.82 16:54:25.33 +37:49:56.60 SN 2026evz 2026-03-21.32 17.54 17:06:19.20 -18:54:19.50 ASASSN-26bx 2026-03-21.25 16.39 19:01:16.28 -29:29:23.10 ASASSN-26bw 2026-03-21.33 15.81 08:46:05.75 +10:47:39.80 ASASSN-26ca 2026-03-21.13 14.27 12:14:58.16 +63:47:16.20 SN 2026fvx 2026-03-21.12 15.6 18:02:55.90 -75:23:02.60 ASASSN-26bz 2026-03-21.32 16.16 12:16:02.88 -53:16:33.80 ASASSN-26cc 2026-03-20.04 15.48 13:08:21.85 +29:13:44.20 SN 2026fmh 2026-03-20.16 -0.33 19:56:38.48 -34:45:21.50 ASASSN-26cb 2026-03-20.35 -3.26 14:32:41.15 -41:38:48.50 ASASSN-26by 2026-03-20.15 -1.31 13:00:42.99 +37:18:34.60 SN2026fjc 2026-03-19.5 15.97 06:02:44.21 -04:11:06.20 ASASSN-26bv 2026-03-19.19 15.67 12:20:27.96 -45:55:38.40 ASASSN-26bt 2026-03-18.8 16.32 07:49:57.30 -56:14:35.10 ASASSN-26bu 2026-03-19.19 15.74 06:04:29.75 +53:23:34.00 SN 2026eza 2026-03-18.2 17.48 11:54:57.87 +69:19:28.90 AT2026fsf 2026-03-18.14 16.95 10:44:46.95 +58:27:29.30 SN 2026enn 2026-03-18.13 17.53 20:45:54.04 -73:26:43.00 AT 2026ezy 2026-03-18.13 16.83 06:53:18.10 -59:10:49.30 ASASSN-26bs 2026-03-18.02 16.93 07:45:09.29 -62:14:36.20 ASASSN-26br 2026-03-16.16 16.78 19:24:27.93 -52:04:36.40 AT 2023uk 2026-03-16.35 14.2 04:52:54.50 -15:20:57.10 AT2026fhw 2026-03-14.06 SDSS 11:10:34.24 +02:58:48.10 SN2026drr 2026-03-14.08 0.2 07:26:45.73 -27:45:13.90 ASASSN-26bo 2026-03-14.17 13.8 16:35:46.94 +58:12:28.40 SN2026ebt 2026-03-12.41 17.12 13:01:19.46 +15:42:15.50 SN2026ehe 2026-03-12.34 -0.18 09:15:55.41 +10:08:09.70 SN2026efq 2026-03-12.16 0.06 03:31:20.92 -35:29:29.00 SN2026evh 2026-03-12.05 17.29 06:26:19.15 -85:18:28.10 AT2026ffp 2026-03-12.16 0.37 14:16:42.30 -41:18:36.50 AT2026fij 2026-03-12.05 15.97 10:45:04.71 +00:06:13.10 SN 2026exe 2026-03-11.78 16.48 18:07:45.58 +69:43:01.00 SN2026ess 2026-03-12.37 17.37 13:11:03.58 +49:06:31.80 AT2026ewa 2026-03-12.42 16.77 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.8K May 10 23:46 asassn_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html : 00:42:51.33 +41:13:49.1 PNV J00425133+4113491 2026-02-20.738 18.3mag 00:43:04.88 +41:29:41.4 PNV J00430488+4129414 2026-02-20.5923 18.84Cmag 17:43:29.74 +11:24:00.3 TCP J17432974+1124003 2026-02-22.3773 13.6mag 09:55:01.59 +69:08:42.7 PNV J09550159+6908427 2026-02-20.893 19.0mag 07:03:25.76 -12:41:40.1 TCP J07032576-1241401 2026-03-10.4268 15.4mag 00:42:36.82 +41:16:05.8 PNV J00423682+4116058 2026-03-12.5744 17.24Cmag 07:26:45.79 -27:45:14.1 TCP J07264579-2745141 2026-03-17.4417 14.8mag 17:57:19.56 -28:08:14.7 TCP J17571956-2808147 2026-03-19.7972 14.5mag 08:46:05.73 +10:47:39.7 TCP J08460573+1047397 2026-03-21.1936 14.5mag 09:55:38.83 +69:05:21.7 PNV J09553883+6905217 2026-04-01.893 19.4mag 19:32:43.67 -22:39:30.7 TCP J19324367-2239307 2026-04-05.4395 13.6mag 16:16:36.03 +44:52:28.9 TCP J16163603+4452289 2026-04-05.6655 14.2mag 00:43:38.36 +41:15:32.4 PNV J00433836+4115324 2026-04-08.079 17.2mag 15:41:11.68 +59:18:26.8 TCP J15411168+5918268 2026-04-12.9625 19.2mag 00:43:35.02 +41:46:28.0 PNV J00433502+4146280 2026-04-23.056 15.9mag 00:42:55.64 +41:14:12.2 PNV J00425564+4114122 2026-04-24.042 16.2mag 21:14:03.38 +56:46:44.1 TCP J21140338+5646441 2026-05-05.3534 16.7mag 15:03:05.19 +22:02:04.1 TCP J15030519+2202041 2026-05-08.3260 13.9mag 07:15:18.25 +47:53:16.7 TCP J07151825+4753167 2026-05-09.1599 14.4mag 16:00:18.44 -22:30:10.6 TCP J16001844-2230106 2026-05-09.6135 13.3mag -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 188K May 10 23:46 tocp_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ : 10:52:38.850 +04:28:22.81 AT 2026liq 2026-04-16.58 22.12 09:17:17.861 +24:52:59.16 AT 2026lip 2026-05-04.29 19.167 18:43:35.838 -18:26:46.49 AT 2026lio 2026-04-29.46 17.465 19:45:06.300 +04:59:48.72 AT 2026lin 2026-05-02.45 18.394 18:13:26.628 +10:07:10.12 AT 2026lim 2026-05-01.46 19.503 09:21:14.008 -20:11:51.31 AT 2026lil 2026-04-08.38 20.07 19:39:56.943 +09:19:03.51 AT 2026lik 2026-04-30.43 18.527 19:36:07.718 -13:37:37.69 AT 2026lij 2026-04-30.42 18.198 19:43:59.404 +10:35:29.56 AT 2026lii 2026-04-29.43 19.494 17:53:28.438 -13:50:29.84 AT 2026lih 2026-04-29.42 17.636 14:26:40.200 -24:48:39.30 AT 2026lig 2026-05-04.25 14.7 09:37:27.727 +05:56:37.23 AT 2026lif 2026-05-03.87 19.246 11:03:06.682 +17:02:24.06 AT 2026lie 2026-05-03.89 19.67 10:50:39.250 +31:29:59.62 AT 2026lid 2026-05-01.88 19.34 11:59:09.620 +30:06:03.09 AT 2026lic 2026-05-03.91 19.53 18:55:17.574 -17:29:14.73 AT 2026lib 2026-04-29.30 17.84 18:24:57.703 +42:18:13.96 AT 2026lia 2026-04-23.09 19.139 22:23:20.273 -48:24:16.87 AT 2026lhz 2026-04-26.11 19.321 23:35:39.073 -30:16:37.21 AT 2026lhy 2026-04-27.40 18.692 22:01:11.748 -71:42:56.69 AT 2026lhx 2026-04-26.15 19.179 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 30K May 10 23:46 tns_transients_list.txt

Profiling:

CPU temperature: 65 C