This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_221542_TTUQ2b1x1_3157753_kmQSRUWW
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461171.6346,7.12,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260511.1346 7.12CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461171.6346,7.21,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260511.1346 7.21CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461171.6346,7.67,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260511.1346 7.67CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461171.6346,7.70,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260511.1346 7.70CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461171.6346,7.74,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260511.1346 7.74CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461171.6346,7.87,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260511.1346 7.87CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J111.9286+22.1603,2461171.6346,12.77,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J111.9286+22.1603 20260511.1346 12.77CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 11.1346 2461171.6346 13.36 07:16:20.51 +22:19:59.5
195.28930 15.22140 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.9" and 8.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.17 Thetis 2 -1 2 13.4 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:16:20.51 +22:19:59.5: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:16:20.51 +22:19:59.5: 15.94 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461171.6346,13.36,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260511.1346 13.36CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 11.1346 2461171.6346 13.79 07:35:51.81 +22:57:36.7
196.51003 19.61712 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 8.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.200 Dynamene 2 -0 2 13.9 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:35:51.81 +22:57:36.7: 16.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:35:51.81 +22:57:36.7: 16.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461171.6346,13.79,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260511.1346 13.79CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
PS1-3PI J072732.58+220840.7,2461171.6346,14.03,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
PS1-3PI J072732.58+220840.7 20260511.1346 14.03CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 11.1346 2461171.6346 14.24 07:34:28.43 +22:56:41.8
196.39760 19.31489 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 8.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.133 Cyrene 2 0 2 14.3 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:34:28.43 +22:56:41.8: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:34:28.43 +22:56:41.8: 16.13 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461171.6346,14.24,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260511.1346 14.24CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 11.1346 2461171.6346 14.37 07:38:42.93 +20:46:08.5
198.92726 19.39875 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 8.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.206 Hersilia 2 0 2 14.4 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:38:42.93 +20:46:08.5: 16.07 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:38:42.93 +20:46:08.5: 16.13 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461171.6346,14.37,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260511.1346 14.37CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.73760365 18.01.2026 05:41:58.955 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
First image: 2461058.73760365 18.01.2026 05:41:58.955 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Last image: 2461171.63490132 11.05.2026 03:14:05.474 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_221542_TTUQ2b1x1_3157753_kmQSRUWW/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 5
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.60
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 8 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 13778
Objects passed selection criteria: 13755
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 13648.8
Average stars matched: 12483 (91.4589 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 122660 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun May 10 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-44-gd532a530
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-10)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun May 10 22:19:03 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.73760365 18.01.2026 05:41:58.955 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
First image: 2461058.73760365 18.01.2026 05:41:58.955 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Last image: 2461171.63490132 11.05.2026 03:14:05.474 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_221542_TTUQ2b1x1_3157753_kmQSRUWW/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 164
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.28
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 67 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 95944
Objects passed selection criteria: 95764
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 98441.8
Average stars matched: 90028.2 (91.4533 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1904264 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun May 10 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-44-gd532a530
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-10)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun May 10 22:22:17 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_221542_TTUQ2b1x1_3157753_kmQSRUWW/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-13-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0067.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_221542_TTUQ2b1x1_3157753_kmQSRUWW/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_221542_TTUQ2b1x1_3157753_kmQSRUWW/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-13-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0067.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_221542_TTUQ2b1x1_3157753_kmQSRUWW/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461171.63420067
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_221542_TTUQ2b1x1_3157753_kmQSRUWW/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-13-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0067.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_221542_TTUQ2b1x1_3157753_kmQSRUWW/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-13-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0067.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_221542_TTUQ2b1x1_3157753_kmQSRUWW/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_221542_TTUQ2b1x1_3157753_kmQSRUWW/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_221542_TTUQ2b1x1_3157753_kmQSRUWW/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-13-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0067.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_221542_TTUQ2b1x1_3157753_kmQSRUWW/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_221542_TTUQ2b1x1_3157753_kmQSRUWW/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-13-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0067.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_221542_TTUQ2b1x1_3157753_kmQSRUWW/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_221542_TTUQ2b1x1_3157753_kmQSRUWW/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-13-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0067.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-13-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0067.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_221542_TTUQ2b1x1_3157753_kmQSRUWW/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-13-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0067.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_221542_TTUQ2b1x1_3157753_kmQSRUWW/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_221542_TTUQ2b1x1_3157753_kmQSRUWW/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
The guess is 605 arcmin.
The guess is 605 arcmin.
No image with WCS calibration found for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_221542_TTUQ2b1x1_3157753_kmQSRUWW/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-13-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0067.fits .... Determining astrometry method...
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net software...
Choosing aperture...
Using the catalog image00003.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_221542_TTUQ2b1x1_3157753_kmQSRUWW/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-13-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0067.fits
No image with WCS calibration found for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_221542_TTUQ2b1x1_3157753_kmQSRUWW/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068.fits .... Determining astrometry method...
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits'
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net software...
Choosing aperture...
Using the catalog image00004.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_221542_TTUQ2b1x1_3157753_kmQSRUWW/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068.fits
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
The guess is 573 arcmin.
The guess is 573 arcmin.
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
verification OK: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
verification OK: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-10_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_221542_TTUQ2b1x1_3157753_kmQSRUWW/lib/make_outxyls_for_astrometric_calibration found 14104 high-SNR stars for plate solving
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-10_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_221542_TTUQ2b1x1_3157753_kmQSRUWW/lib/make_outxyls_for_astrometric_calibration found 14182 high-SNR stars for plate solving
Generating wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat from image00002.cat
Generating wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat from image00001.cat
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
This service uses tools provided by Astrometry.net.
For more information visit http://astrometry.net/
######### Trying to solve plate assuming 605' field of view #########
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_221542_TTUQ2b1x1_3157753_kmQSRUWW/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-13-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0067.fits
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net code
This service uses tools provided by Astrometry.net.
For more information visit http://astrometry.net/
IMAGE_SIZE= --width 9576 --height 6388 SCALE_LOW=544.5 SCALE_HIGH=3025.0
Using solve-field binary
/usr/local/astrometry/bin/solve-field
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out3269850.xyls"...
######### Trying to solve plate assuming 605' field of view #########
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_221542_TTUQ2b1x1_3157753_kmQSRUWW/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068.fits
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net code
verification OK: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
IMAGE_SIZE= --width 9576 --height 6388 SCALE_LOW=544.5 SCALE_HIGH=3025.0
Using solve-field binary
/usr/local/astrometry/bin/solve-field
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out3269851.xyls"...
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
verification OK: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:03.842 +21:59:59.85 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:22:55.118 +21:59:39.20 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 23656 stars ###
'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-10_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_221542_TTUQ2b1x1_3157753_kmQSRUWW/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3270224.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
### Converted positions of 22550 stars ###
'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-10_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_221542_TTUQ2b1x1_3157753_kmQSRUWW/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3270280.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading file "./out3269851.axy"...
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4119.fits, field objects 1-10).
Reading file "./out3269850.axy"...
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4118.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4119.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4117.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4118.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4117.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4116.fits, field objects 1-10).
log-odds ratio 27.6714 (1.04124e+12), 12 match, 0 conflict, 41 distractors, 43 index.
RA,Dec = (110.88,22.0101), pixel scale 5.93332 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ----+-------+-----+--++-+-----+-----+--+--+--------++(best)-----------------------------------------------
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4116.fits, field objects 1-10).
log-odds ratio 30.3837 (1.56847e+13), 11 match, 0 conflict, 32 distractors, 43 index.
RA,Dec = (110.87,22.02), pixel scale 5.93321 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ----+-------+-----+---+-+--+--+-----+--++-+(best)--------+------------------------------------------------
Field 1: solved with index index-4115.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out3269851.solved to indicate this.
Field: out3269851.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (110.858236, 22.006165) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (07:23:25.977, +22:00:22.195).
Field size: 15.7388 x 10.5329 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is 179.316 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Inserting WCS header... Field 1: solved with index index-4115.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out3269850.solved to indicate this.
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_221542_TTUQ2b1x1_3157753_kmQSRUWW/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068.fits' -> 'fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068.fits'
Field: out3269850.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (110.848285, 22.016074) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (07:23:23.588, +22:00:57.866).
Field size: 15.7386 x 10.5329 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is 179.319 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Inserting WCS header... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_221542_TTUQ2b1x1_3157753_kmQSRUWW/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-13-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0067.fits' -> 'fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-13-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0067.fits'
WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M May 10 22:19 fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K May 10 22:19 out3269851.wcs
Inserting WCS header (1st iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068.fits)... done!
WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M May 10 22:19 fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-13-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0067.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K May 10 22:19 out3269850.wcs
Inserting WCS header (1st iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-13-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0067.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-13-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0067.fits)... done!
done!
done!
All done!
done
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_221542_TTUQ2b1x1_3157753_kmQSRUWW/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068.fits (fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068.fits)
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration01' / astrometry.net run
All done!
done
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_221542_TTUQ2b1x1_3157753_kmQSRUWW/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-13-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0067.fits (fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-13-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0067.fits)
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration01' / astrometry.net run
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out3269851.xyls"...
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out3269850.xyls"...
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading file "./out3269850.axy"...
Only searching for solutions within 15.6667 degrees of RA,Dec (110.847,22.0152)
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
log-odds ratio 131.566 (1.37514e+57), 17 match, 0 conflict, 24 distractors, 25 index.
RA,Dec = (110.848,22.0158), pixel scale 5.95229 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -+-++-++--++++++-++----++----------+----+(best)-----------------------------------------------------------
Reading file "./out3269851.axy"...
Only searching for solutions within 15.6667 degrees of RA,Dec (110.857,22.0053)
log-odds ratio 131.641 (1.48226e+57), 17 match, 0 conflict, 22 distractors, 25 index.
RA,Dec = (110.858,22.0058), pixel scale 5.95238 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -+-++-++--++++++-++-----+----+---+----+(best)-------------------------------------------------------------
Field 1: solved with index index-4116.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out3269850.solved to indicate this.
Field: out3269850.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (110.849349, 22.015483) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (07:23:23.844, +22:00:55.740).
Field size: 15.7152 x 10.5354 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is 179.314 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Field 1: solved with index index-4116.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out3269851.solved to indicate this.
Field: out3269851.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (110.859302, 22.005545) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (07:23:26.233, +22:00:19.962).
Field size: 15.7153 x 10.5354 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is 179.312 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M May 10 22:19 fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-13-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0067.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K May 10 22:19 out3269850.wcs
Inserting WCS header (2nd iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-13-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0067.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-13-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0067.fits)... done!
WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M May 10 22:19 fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K May 10 22:19 out3269851.wcs
Inserting WCS header (2nd iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068.fits)... done!
done!
done!
All done!
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors.
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration02' / astrometry.net run
The field of view is large: we'll try to run Astromety.net code on the image itself rather than a star list
Reading input file "wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-13-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0067.fits"...
Found an existing WCS header, will try to verify it.
Extracting sources...
All done!
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors.
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration02' / astrometry.net run
The field of view is large: we'll try to run Astromety.net code on the image itself rather than a star list
Reading input file "wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068.fits"...
Found an existing WCS header, will try to verify it.
Extracting sources...
simplexy: found 70241 sources.
simplexy: found 69105 sources.
Solving...
Solving...
Reading file "./wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-13-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0067.axy"...
Verifying WCS using indices with quads of size [63.4986, 951.882] arcmin
Reading file "./wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068.axy"...
Verifying WCS using indices with quads of size [63.4989, 951.887] arcmin
Verifying WCS with index 39 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4117.fits)
Verifying WCS with index 39 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4117.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 31.2214 (3.62476e+13), 3 match, 0 conflict, 8 distractors, 12 index.
RA,Dec = (110.85,22.0163), pixel scale 5.96417 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -++-------+(best)------------------------+------------------------------+---------------------------------
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 13.9839
Verifying WCS with index 40 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4116.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 91.6377 (6.277e+39), 25 match, 0 conflict, 666 distractors, 25 index.
RA,Dec = (110.86,22.0064), pixel scale 5.9642 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: --+----+----------------+---++--------------+-----+--------+--------------+-------------------------
--> log-odds 31.2214
Verifying WCS with index 40 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4116.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 42.9871 (4.66738e+18), 24 match, 0 conflict, 746 distractors, 25 index.
RA,Dec = (110.85,22.0163), pixel scale 5.96417 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -++-------+------------------------+------+-----------------------+----------------+----------------
--> log-odds 42.9871
--> log-odds 91.6377
Verifying WCS with index 41 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4115.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 251.516 (1.70614e+109), 42 match, 0 conflict, 728 distractors, 44 index.
RA,Dec = (110.85,22.0163), pixel scale 5.96417 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -+++-----++--+--------+------------+------+--------------------+--+----------+-----+--+----+--------
Verifying WCS with index 41 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4115.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 236.882 (7.52823e+102), 41 match, 0 conflict, 650 distractors, 44 index.
RA,Dec = (110.86,22.0064), pixel scale 5.9642 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: --+++--+----------------+---++-------------++-----+--------+---------+----+--+------++--------------
--> log-odds 236.882
--> log-odds 251.516
Verifying WCS with index 42 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4114.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 675.105 (1.5639e+293), 81 match, 0 conflict, 610 distractors, 87 index.
RA,Dec = (110.86,22.0064), pixel scale 5.9642 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: --+++--+---+------------+---++----+--------++-----+----+---+--+-+-+--+----++-+----+-++-----+--------
Verifying WCS with index 42 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4114.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 658.142 (6.71881e+285), 81 match, 0 conflict, 689 distractors, 88 index.
RA,Dec = (110.85,22.0163), pixel scale 5.96417 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -+++-----++-+---------+------------+-+---++----+-------+--+++--++-+----------+--+--+--+--+-+-----+--
--> log-odds 675.105
Verifying WCS with index 43 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4113.fits)
--> log-odds 658.142
Verifying WCS with index 43 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4113.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 1606.11 (inf), 174 match, 0 conflict, 547 distractors, 186 index.
RA,Dec = (110.86,22.0064), pixel scale 5.9642 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: --+++--+++++-+--+-++++--+-+-++--+-+-+++-+--++-----++---+---+-++++-+--+----++-+-++-++++--++++-+------
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 1563.08 (inf), 173 match, 0 conflict, 668 distractors, 189 index.
RA,Dec = (110.85,22.0163), pixel scale 5.96417 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++++----++-++--+-++--+-++-+------+++++-++++-+-+----+--+--+++--++-++-+------++--+-++--++-+-+----++++
--> log-odds 1563.08
Verifying WCS with index 44 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4112.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 3154.5 (inf), 347 match, 0 conflict, 494 distractors, 373 index.
RA,Dec = (110.85,22.0163), pixel scale 5.96417 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++--+++++++++-+++-++++++++--+++++++++++++-++++-++--++++++--+++++-+--+++++++-+++++-++++-+++--++++
--> log-odds 1606.11
Verifying WCS with index 44 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4112.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 3166.09 (inf), 346 match, 0 conflict, 493 distractors, 370 index.
RA,Dec = (110.86,22.0064), pixel scale 5.9642 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++++++++++-+++++++-++++++++-+-+-+-+++++++++-++++---+++-++++++++--+++++++++-+++++++++++++-++-++++
--> log-odds 3154.5
Verifying WCS with index 45 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4111.fits)
--> log-odds 3166.09
Verifying WCS with index 45 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4111.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 5751.2 (inf), 678 match, 1 conflict, 1135 distractors, 734 index.
RA,Dec = (110.85,22.0163), pixel scale 5.96417 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-+++-+++++++-+++++++-+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
log-odds ratio 5711.29 (inf), 676 match, 1 conflict, 1705 distractors, 731 index.
RA,Dec = (110.86,22.0064), pixel scale 5.9642 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-++++++++-++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
--> log-odds 5711.29
Verifying WCS with index 46 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4110.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 10401.2 (inf), 1334 match, 0 conflict, 2873 distractors, 1445 index.
RA,Dec = (110.86,22.0064), pixel scale 5.9642 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
--> log-odds 5751.2
Verifying WCS with index 46 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4110.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 10479.7 (inf), 1342 match, 0 conflict, 2385 distractors, 1451 index.
RA,Dec = (110.85,22.0163), pixel scale 5.96417 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
--> log-odds 10401.2
--> log-odds 10479.7
Got 7 solutions.
Field: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068.fits
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (110.858945, 22.005522) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (07:23:26.147, +22:00:19.879).
Field size: 15.7145 x 10.5318 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is 179.315 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Creating new FITS file "./wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068.new"...
renamed 'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068.new' -> 'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068.fits'
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_221542_TTUQ2b1x1_3157753_kmQSRUWW/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068.fits
Generating wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068.fits.cat from image00004.cat
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068.fits
Image size: 937.6'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:25.935 +22:00:16.86 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
Got 8 solutions.
Field: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-13-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0067.fits
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (110.848966, 22.015480) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (07:23:23.752, +22:00:55.729).
Field size: 15.7143 x 10.5318 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is 179.318 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Creating new FITS file "./wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-13-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0067.new"...
renamed 'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-13-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0067.new' -> 'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-13-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0067.fits'
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-13-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-13-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0067.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-13-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-13-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0067.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_221542_TTUQ2b1x1_3157753_kmQSRUWW/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-13-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0067.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-13-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0067.fits
Generating wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-13-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat from image00003.cat
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-13-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-13-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0067.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-13-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0067.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-13-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0067.fits
### Converted positions of 14919 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-10_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_221542_TTUQ2b1x1_3157753_kmQSRUWW/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3281004.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068.fits
Image size: 937.6'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:23.540 +22:00:52.71 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 14800 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-13-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-10_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_221542_TTUQ2b1x1_3157753_kmQSRUWW/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3281118.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-13-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0067.fits
wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits'
wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits'
wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-13-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0067.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-13-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0067.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-13-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0067.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-13-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0067.fits'
wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:22:55.118 +21:59:39.20 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-13-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0067.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-13-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0067.fits
Image size: 937.6'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:23.540 +22:00:52.71 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:22:55.118 +21:59:39.20
Second-epoch image center 07:23:23.540 +22:00:52.71
Angular distance between the image centers 0.1117 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068.fits
Image size: 937.6'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:25.935 +22:00:16.86 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:22:55.118 +21:59:39.20
Second-epoch image center 07:23:25.935 +22:00:16.86
Angular distance between the image centers 0.1195 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
ref2=wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
new1=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-13-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0067.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
new2=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
reference average sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
INFO: WCS quality sigma_overall_arcsec not available for comparison (1st new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality sigma_overall_arcsec not available for comparison (2nd new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio not available for comparison (1st new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio not available for comparison (2nd new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:23:23.540 +22:00:52.71
Second-epoch second image center 07:23:25.935 +22:00:16.86
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01359 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits &> /tmp/tmp.0aZb0UNdq2
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits &> /tmp/tmp.V1DeIHPjVw
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_221542_TTUQ2b1x1_3157753_kmQSRUWW/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-13-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0067.fits &> /tmp/tmp.9op0ZyZMW9
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_221542_TTUQ2b1x1_3157753_kmQSRUWW/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-13-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0067.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_221542_TTUQ2b1x1_3157753_kmQSRUWW/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068.fits &> /tmp/tmp.O5kcuGlp5D
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_221542_TTUQ2b1x1_3157753_kmQSRUWW/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 22550 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 101.7556 to 119.3352 deg, Dec +16.3006 to +27.3458 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 101.7556 to 119.3352 deg, Dec 16.3006 to 27.3458 deg
Loaded 14532 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10648 out of 11733 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11733 out of 22550 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.897900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.897900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.60
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.30
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.30
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 22550 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 101.7556 to 119.3352 deg, Dec +16.3006 to +27.3458 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 101.7556 to 119.3352 deg, Dec 16.3006 to 27.3458 deg
Loaded 14532 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10648 out of 11733 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11733 out of 22550 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits (aperture=6.1)
Read 23656 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 102.0351 to 119.5904 deg, Dec +16.4807 to +27.2946 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 102.0351 to 119.5904 deg, Dec 16.4807 to 27.2946 deg
Loaded 13969 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10670 out of 11761 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11761 out of 23656 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 4 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
2.3 pix Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
2.5 pix fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-13-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0067.fits
2.5 pix fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
15.3 mag. Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-13-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0067.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.7 (SNR ) 11.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.0aZb0UNdq2 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-10_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_221542_TTUQ2b1x1_3157753_kmQSRUWW/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2218, passed=22550
Got 22550 stars (including 20300 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 22550 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 954 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 941 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22225 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 954 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22223 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22223 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 953 stars left (next iteration limit 1048)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits N_match=953 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.378 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.382 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.369 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.403 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.326 n_q1=221 n_q2=248 n_q3=257 n_q4=227 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.067
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits -region wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.V1DeIHPjVw (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-10_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_221542_TTUQ2b1x1_3157753_kmQSRUWW/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2265, passed=23656
Got 23656 stars (including 21362 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 23656 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 951 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 930 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22858 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 952 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22858 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22858 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 949 stars left (next iteration limit 1045)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits N_match=949 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.429 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.494 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.445 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.379 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.360 n_q1=167 n_q2=274 n_q3=215 n_q4=293 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.152
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits -region wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.9op0ZyZMW9 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-10_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_221542_TTUQ2b1x1_3157753_kmQSRUWW/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_221542_TTUQ2b1x1_3157753_kmQSRUWW/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-13-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0067.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_221542_TTUQ2b1x1_3157753_kmQSRUWW/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-13-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0067.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_221542_TTUQ2b1x1_3157753_kmQSRUWW/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-13-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0067.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_221542_TTUQ2b1x1_3157753_kmQSRUWW/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-13-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0067.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_221542_TTUQ2b1x1_3157753_kmQSRUWW/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-13-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0067.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_221542_TTUQ2b1x1_3157753_kmQSRUWW/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-13-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0067.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-13-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0067.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-13-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0067.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-13-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-13-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0067.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-13-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-13-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0067.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-13-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0067.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_221542_TTUQ2b1x1_3157753_kmQSRUWW/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-13-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0067.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-13-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=999, passed=14800
Got 14800 stars (including 13790 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-13-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14800 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 927 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14608 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.62"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14609 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.63"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14609 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.70"
Excluding outliers - 938 stars left (next iteration limit 1031)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-13-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0067.fits N_match=938 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.669 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.504 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.779 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.605 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.716 n_q1=183 n_q2=278 n_q3=204 n_q4=273 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.163
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-13-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-13-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_221542_TTUQ2b1x1_3157753_kmQSRUWW/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-13-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0067.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-13-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-13-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.O5kcuGlp5D (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-10_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_221542_TTUQ2b1x1_3157753_kmQSRUWW/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_221542_TTUQ2b1x1_3157753_kmQSRUWW/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_221542_TTUQ2b1x1_3157753_kmQSRUWW/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_221542_TTUQ2b1x1_3157753_kmQSRUWW/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_221542_TTUQ2b1x1_3157753_kmQSRUWW/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_221542_TTUQ2b1x1_3157753_kmQSRUWW/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_221542_TTUQ2b1x1_3157753_kmQSRUWW/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_221542_TTUQ2b1x1_3157753_kmQSRUWW/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=979, passed=14919
Got 14919 stars (including 13929 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14919 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 927 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14720 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.63"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14720 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.63"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14720 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.70"
Excluding outliers - 938 stars left (next iteration limit 1032)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068.fits N_match=938 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.629 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.446 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.667 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.575 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.721 n_q1=186 n_q2=277 n_q3=199 n_q4=276 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.148
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_221542_TTUQ2b1x1_3157753_kmQSRUWW/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-13-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0067.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-13-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0067.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_221542_TTUQ2b1x1_3157753_kmQSRUWW/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-13-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0067.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_221542_TTUQ2b1x1_3157753_kmQSRUWW/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 4s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34571_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068
Preparing report for the candidate 34571_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34572_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068
Preparing report for the candidate 34572_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34573_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068
Preparing report for the candidate 34573_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30957_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068
The candidate 30957_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:43:02.32 +23:26:56.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 7s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Gem-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_221542_TTUQ2b1x1_3157753_kmQSRUWW/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-13-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0067.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_221542_TTUQ2b1x1_3157753_kmQSRUWW/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_221542_TTUQ2b1x1_3157753_kmQSRUWW/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-13-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0067.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_221542_TTUQ2b1x1_3157753_kmQSRUWW/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-13-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0067.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_221542_TTUQ2b1x1_3157753_kmQSRUWW/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-13-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0067.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_221542_TTUQ2b1x1_3157753_kmQSRUWW/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-13-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0067.fits
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_221542_TTUQ2b1x1_3157753_kmQSRUWW/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-13-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0067.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_221542_TTUQ2b1x1_3157753_kmQSRUWW/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_221542_TTUQ2b1x1_3157753_kmQSRUWW/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_221542_TTUQ2b1x1_3157753_kmQSRUWW/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-13-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0067.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_221542_TTUQ2b1x1_3157753_kmQSRUWW/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_221542_TTUQ2b1x1_3157753_kmQSRUWW/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_221542_TTUQ2b1x1_3157753_kmQSRUWW/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-13-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0067.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-13-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0067.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_221542_TTUQ2b1x1_3157753_kmQSRUWW/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-13-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0067.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_221542_TTUQ2b1x1_3157753_kmQSRUWW/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_221542_TTUQ2b1x1_3157753_kmQSRUWW/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
The guess is 605 arcmin.
The guess is 605 arcmin.
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-13-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0067.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-13-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-13-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0067.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-13-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-13-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0067.fits was not found.
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068.fits was not found.
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_221542_TTUQ2b1x1_3157753_kmQSRUWW/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-13-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0067.fits
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-13-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0067.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_221542_TTUQ2b1x1_3157753_kmQSRUWW/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068.fits
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068.fits
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
The guess is 573 arcmin.
The guess is 573 arcmin.
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits was not found.
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
verification OK: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
verification OK: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Generating wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-13-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat from image00003.cat
Generating wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068.fits.cat from image00004.cat
Generating wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat from image00001.cat
Generating wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat from image00002.cat
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068.fits
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-13-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-13-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0067.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-13-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0067.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-13-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0067.fits
Image size: 937.6'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:25.935 +22:00:16.86 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
Image size: 937.6'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:23.540 +22:00:52.71 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits created.
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
verification OK: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
verification OK: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
verification OK: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:22:55.118 +21:59:39.20 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:03.842 +21:59:59.85 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 97453 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-10_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_221542_TTUQ2b1x1_3157753_kmQSRUWW/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3318552.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068.fits
### Converted positions of 99344 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-13-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-10_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_221542_TTUQ2b1x1_3157753_kmQSRUWW/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3318561.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-13-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0067.fits
### Converted positions of 151496 stars ###
'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-10_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_221542_TTUQ2b1x1_3157753_kmQSRUWW/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3318734.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
### Converted positions of 153680 stars ###
'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-10_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_221542_TTUQ2b1x1_3157753_kmQSRUWW/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3318737.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-13-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0067.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:22:55.118 +21:59:39.20 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-13-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0067.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-13-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0067.fits
Image size: 937.6'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:23.540 +22:00:52.71 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:22:55.118 +21:59:39.20
Second-epoch image center 07:23:23.540 +22:00:52.71
Angular distance between the image centers 0.1117 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068.fits
Image size: 937.6'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:25.935 +22:00:16.86 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:22:55.118 +21:59:39.20
Second-epoch image center 07:23:25.935 +22:00:16.86
Angular distance between the image centers 0.1195 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
ref2=wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
new1=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-13-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0067.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
new2=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
reference average sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
INFO: WCS quality sigma_overall_arcsec not available for comparison (1st new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality sigma_overall_arcsec not available for comparison (2nd new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio not available for comparison (1st new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio not available for comparison (2nd new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:23:23.540 +22:00:52.71
Second-epoch second image center 07:23:25.935 +22:00:16.86
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01359 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits &> /tmp/tmp.IQOi0HHoY5
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits &> /tmp/tmp.EUH2y2zPte
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_221542_TTUQ2b1x1_3157753_kmQSRUWW/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-13-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0067.fits &> /tmp/tmp.YVrqGyZR5n
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_221542_TTUQ2b1x1_3157753_kmQSRUWW/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-13-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0067.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_221542_TTUQ2b1x1_3157753_kmQSRUWW/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068.fits &> /tmp/tmp.FwQN9NQExW
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_221542_TTUQ2b1x1_3157753_kmQSRUWW/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 153680 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 101.7461 to 119.3352 deg, Dec +16.3007 to +27.3487 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 101.7461 to 119.3352 deg, Dec 16.3007 to 27.3487 deg
Loaded 14554 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8811 out of 12036 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12036 out of 153680 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.757100
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.757100
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.28
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.48
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.48
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 153680 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 101.7461 to 119.3352 deg, Dec +16.3007 to +27.3487 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 101.7461 to 119.3352 deg, Dec 16.3007 to 27.3487 deg
Loaded 14554 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8811 out of 12036 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12036 out of 153680 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits (aperture=4.6)
Read 151496 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 102.0337 to 119.6237 deg, Dec +16.4751 to +27.2973 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 102.0337 to 119.6237 deg, Dec 16.4751 to 27.2973 deg
Loaded 14001 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8799 out of 12010 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12010 out of 151496 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits (aperture=4.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 135 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
2.1 pix Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
2.2 pix fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-13-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0067.fits
2.2 pix fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068.fits
1.9 pix wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
15.5 mag. Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-13-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0067.fits
14.9 mag. fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.9 (SNR ) 14.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.IQOi0HHoY5 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-10_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_221542_TTUQ2b1x1_3157753_kmQSRUWW/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=36, blended=17863, passed=153644
Got 153644 stars (including 135507 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 153644 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 941 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 151041 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 151042 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 151042 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 953 stars left (next iteration limit 1048)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits N_match=953 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.357 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.384 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.394 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.367 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.271 n_q1=234 n_q2=237 n_q3=245 n_q4=237 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.102
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits -region wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.EUH2y2zPte (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-10_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_221542_TTUQ2b1x1_3157753_kmQSRUWW/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=23, blended=17705, passed=151473
Got 151473 stars (including 133510 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 151473 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 954 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 937 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 148383 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 954 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 148381 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 148382 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 953 stars left (next iteration limit 1049)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits N_match=953 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.447 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.453 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.476 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.432 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.371 n_q1=183 n_q2=265 n_q3=224 n_q4=281 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.066
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits -region wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.YVrqGyZR5n (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-10_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_221542_TTUQ2b1x1_3157753_kmQSRUWW/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_221542_TTUQ2b1x1_3157753_kmQSRUWW/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-13-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0067.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_221542_TTUQ2b1x1_3157753_kmQSRUWW/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-13-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0067.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_221542_TTUQ2b1x1_3157753_kmQSRUWW/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-13-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0067.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_221542_TTUQ2b1x1_3157753_kmQSRUWW/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-13-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0067.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_221542_TTUQ2b1x1_3157753_kmQSRUWW/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-13-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0067.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_221542_TTUQ2b1x1_3157753_kmQSRUWW/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-13-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0067.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-13-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0067.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-13-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0067.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-13-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-13-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0067.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-13-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-13-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0067.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-13-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0067.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_221542_TTUQ2b1x1_3157753_kmQSRUWW/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-13-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0067.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-13-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=37, blended=7836, passed=99307
Got 99307 stars (including 91360 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-13-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 99307 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 919 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 97400 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 97403 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 97403 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.64"
Excluding outliers - 943 stars left (next iteration limit 1037)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-13-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0067.fits N_match=943 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.666 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.515 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.694 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.673 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.697 n_q1=184 n_q2=278 n_q3=206 n_q4=275 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.047
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-13-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-13-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_221542_TTUQ2b1x1_3157753_kmQSRUWW/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-13-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0067.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-13-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-13-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.FwQN9NQExW (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-10_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_221542_TTUQ2b1x1_3157753_kmQSRUWW/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_221542_TTUQ2b1x1_3157753_kmQSRUWW/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_221542_TTUQ2b1x1_3157753_kmQSRUWW/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_221542_TTUQ2b1x1_3157753_kmQSRUWW/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_221542_TTUQ2b1x1_3157753_kmQSRUWW/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_221542_TTUQ2b1x1_3157753_kmQSRUWW/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_221542_TTUQ2b1x1_3157753_kmQSRUWW/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_221542_TTUQ2b1x1_3157753_kmQSRUWW/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=30, blended=7456, passed=97423
Got 97423 stars (including 89858 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 97423 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 924 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 95761 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 95761 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 95761 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Excluding outliers - 941 stars left (next iteration limit 1036)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068.fits N_match=941 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.593 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.472 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.604 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.594 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.637 n_q1=189 n_q2=274 n_q3=203 n_q4=275 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.073
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_221542_TTUQ2b1x1_3157753_kmQSRUWW/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-13-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0067.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_221542_TTUQ2b1x1_3157753_kmQSRUWW/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-13-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0067.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_221542_TTUQ2b1x1_3157753_kmQSRUWW/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:18:26.38 +21:34:44.4: 14.04 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:24:47.22 +20:17:26.9: 14.46 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:13:51.03 +23:12:08.5: 15.15 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:25:38.52 +23:11:11.3: 14.37 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:11:55.20 +24:15:45.6: 14.03 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:24:07.72 +20:44:50.5: 14.29 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:31:28.03 +22:55:09.4: 14.38 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:27:57.30 +24:23:10.8: 14.50 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:18:13.96 +24:10:28.5: 13.82 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:30:27.84 +25:59:45.6: 14.28 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:18:26.38 +21:34:44.4: 13.97 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.00 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:24:47.22 +20:17:26.9: 14.62 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:18:26.38 +21:34:44.4: ref_mag=14.00 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.3396 delta=-0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.53 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:24:07.72 +20:44:50.5: 14.42 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:24:47.22 +20:17:26.9: ref_mag=14.53 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.5870 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:25:38.52 +23:11:11.3: 14.58 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:13:51.03 +23:12:08.5: 14.91 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:11:55.20 +24:15:45.6: 13.98 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:31:28.03 +22:55:09.4: 14.55 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.34 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.46 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.00 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:24:07.72 +20:44:50.5: ref_mag=14.34 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.6368 delta=-0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.00 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:27:57.30 +24:23:10.8: 14.62 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:25:38.52 +23:11:11.3: ref_mag=14.46 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.8526 delta=-0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:13:51.03 +23:12:08.5: ref_mag=15.00 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.8437 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.45 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:11:55.20 +24:15:45.6: ref_mag=14.00 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.4350 delta=-0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:31:28.03 +22:55:09.4: ref_mag=14.45 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.6580 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.56 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:27:57.30 +24:23:10.8: ref_mag=14.56 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.5506 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:18:13.96 +24:10:28.5: 13.82 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:30:27.84 +25:59:45.6: 14.34 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.82 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.31 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:18:13.96 +24:10:28.5: ref_mag=13.82 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.1431 delta=-0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:30:27.84 +25:59:45.6: ref_mag=14.31 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.1417 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:26:43.09 +18:08:57.3: 13.88 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:13:01.39 +20:29:29.8: 13.89 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:23:44.00 +25:47:45.9: 13.75 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:21:05.09 +21:26:56.2: 13.76 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:31:17.06 +17:57:04.6: 13.78 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:17:46.01 +24:13:27.7: 13.27 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:26:43.09 +18:08:57.3: 13.93 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:13:01.39 +20:29:29.8: 13.97 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:21:21.07 +23:34:28.0: 12.96 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:23:44.00 +25:47:45.9: 13.80 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.91 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:21:05.09 +21:26:56.2: 13.89 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.93 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:26:43.09 +18:08:57.3: ref_mag=13.91 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.1062 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:13:01.39 +20:29:29.8: ref_mag=13.93 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.0791 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.78 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:31:17.06 +17:57:04.6: 13.76 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:23:44.00 +25:47:45.9: ref_mag=13.78 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7208 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.82 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:21:05.09 +21:26:56.2: ref_mag=13.82 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.9758 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.77 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:31:17.06 +17:57:04.6: ref_mag=13.77 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6437 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:17:46.01 +24:13:27.7: 13.32 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.29 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:17:46.01 +24:13:27.7: ref_mag=13.29 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.5896 delta=-0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:21:21.07 +23:34:28.0: 13.01 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.99 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:21:21.07 +23:34:28.0: ref_mag=12.99 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.2880 delta=-0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:31:35.98 +20:51:44.0: 12.84 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:05:01.35 +19:41:49.1: 12.69 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:42:10.07 +23:48:40.7: 12.71 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:31:35.98 +20:51:44.0: 12.81 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.82 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:31:35.98 +20:51:44.0: ref_mag=12.82 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.1229 delta=-0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:05:01.35 +19:41:49.1: 12.62 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:28:34.82 +22:15:14.5: 11.66 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.66 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:05:01.35 +19:41:49.1: ref_mag=12.66 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.7999 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:42:10.07 +23:48:40.7: 12.72 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.71 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:42:10.07 +23:48:40.7: ref_mag=12.71 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.8998 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:28:34.82 +22:15:14.5: 11.55 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.60 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:28:34.82 +22:15:14.5: ref_mag=11.60 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=12.0198 delta=-0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:16:20.51 +22:19:59.5: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:16:20.51 +22:19:59.5: 15.94 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:35:51.81 +22:57:36.7: 16.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:13:11.86 +26:11:50.0: 13.96 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:35:51.81 +22:57:36.7: 16.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:19:40.21 +21:05:53.1: 13.50 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:13:11.86 +26:11:50.0: 13.87 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.91 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:13:11.86 +26:11:50.0: ref_mag=13.91 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8599 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:19:40.21 +21:05:53.1: 13.69 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.57 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:19:40.21 +21:05:53.1: ref_mag=13.57 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7898 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:08:02.20 +26:00:39.8: 13.54 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:08:02.20 +26:00:39.8: 13.75 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.62 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:08:02.20 +26:00:39.8: ref_mag=13.62 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8427 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:18:39.15 +25:35:46.7: 13.85 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:20:02.66 +20:49:58.5: 13.90 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:18:39.15 +25:35:46.7: 14.02 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.92 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:18:39.15 +25:35:46.7: ref_mag=13.92 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0291 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:20:02.66 +20:49:58.5: 13.91 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.91 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:20:02.66 +20:49:58.5: ref_mag=13.91 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0363 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:30:10.21 +22:10:49.4: 13.78 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:38:18.18 +22:13:46.8: 14.06 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:15:38.28 +19:51:30.2: 13.96 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:34:28.43 +22:56:41.8: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:38:18.18 +22:13:46.8: 14.04 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:30:10.21 +22:10:49.4: 14.02 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.05 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:15:38.28 +19:51:30.2: 13.98 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.88 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:38:18.18 +22:13:46.8: ref_mag=14.05 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.1678 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:34:28.43 +22:56:41.8: 16.13 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:30:10.21 +22:10:49.4: ref_mag=13.88 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.1577 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.97 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:15:38.28 +19:51:30.2: ref_mag=13.97 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0039 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:11:53.63 +22:36:37.9: 14.50 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:11:14.35 +24:22:08.7: 14.17 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:11:05.17 +22:10:20.8: 14.38 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:11:53.63 +22:36:37.9: 14.32 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.40 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:11:53.63 +22:36:37.9: ref_mag=14.40 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.3078 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:31:22.55 +25:01:52.9: 14.42 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:11:14.35 +24:22:08.7: 14.19 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.18 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:11:14.35 +24:22:08.7: ref_mag=14.18 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.2426 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:11:05.17 +22:10:20.8: 14.48 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.43 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:11:05.17 +22:10:20.8: ref_mag=14.43 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.4589 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:31:22.55 +25:01:52.9: 14.38 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.40 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:31:22.55 +25:01:52.9: ref_mag=14.40 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.3711 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:38:42.93 +20:46:08.5: 16.07 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:14:47.00 +24:28:45.4: 14.90 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:22:46.14 +24:58:43.5: 14.80 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:11:36.97 +20:58:30.9: 14.33 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:20:22.74 +22:30:02.3: 14.34 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:38:42.93 +20:46:08.5: 16.13 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:27:35.99 +24:37:13.9: 15.06 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:32:04.50 +23:19:39.6: 14.96 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:14:47.00 +24:28:45.4: 14.86 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.88 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:11:36.97 +20:58:30.9: 14.42 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:14:47.00 +24:28:45.4: ref_mag=14.88 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.6118 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:20:22.74 +22:30:02.3: 15.29 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:22:46.14 +24:58:43.5: 14.82 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.38 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:11:36.97 +20:58:30.9: ref_mag=14.38 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.5563 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.29 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.81 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:20:22.74 +22:30:02.3: ref_mag=15.29 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=14.6290 delta=0.66 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:22:46.14 +24:58:43.5: ref_mag=14.81 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.5155 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:27:35.99 +24:37:13.9: 15.21 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.13 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:27:35.99 +24:37:13.9: ref_mag=15.13 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.8278 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:32:04.50 +23:19:39.6: 14.95 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.95 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:32:04.50 +23:19:39.6: ref_mag=14.95 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.6062 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:24:20.13 +19:53:15.3: 14.91 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:13:51.40 +21:22:28.1: 15.13 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:22:50.05 +24:56:27.7: 15.16 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:30:54.27 +23:56:11.6: 14.94 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:19:01.53 +18:41:58.5: 15.05 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:24:20.13 +19:53:15.3: 14.79 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.84 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:24:20.13 +19:53:15.3: ref_mag=14.84 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.7902 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:13:51.40 +21:22:28.1: 14.89 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:25:10.69 +22:59:30.8: 15.07 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.98 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:13:51.40 +21:22:28.1: ref_mag=14.98 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.7862 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:22:50.05 +24:56:27.7: 14.98 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.06 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:22:50.05 +24:56:27.7: ref_mag=15.06 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.7760 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:30:54.27 +23:56:11.6: 15.05 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.99 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:30:54.27 +23:56:11.6: ref_mag=14.99 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.8040 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:19:01.53 +18:41:58.5: 15.30 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.15 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:19:01.53 +18:41:58.5: ref_mag=15.15 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.8764 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:25:10.69 +22:59:30.8: 15.01 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.04 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:25:10.69 +22:59:30.8: ref_mag=15.04 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.9510 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:21:51.22 +23:15:20.9: 15.65 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:15:11.44 +23:11:35.8: 15.02 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:21:51.22 +23:15:20.9: 15.42 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.50 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:21:51.22 +23:15:20.9: ref_mag=15.50 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.8432 delta=0.66 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:15:11.44 +23:11:35.8: 15.14 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.08 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:15:11.44 +23:11:35.8: ref_mag=15.08 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.9690 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out195843.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out195997.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out196212.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out196428.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 17s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 6s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195478_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068
The candidate 195478_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195479_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068
The candidate 195479_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195483_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068
The candidate 195483_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195497_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068
The candidate 195497_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195519_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068
The candidate 195519_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195526_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068
The candidate 195526_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:22:32.56 +18:04:29.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195528_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068
The candidate 195528_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195532_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068
The candidate 195532_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195542_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068
The candidate 195542_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195556_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068
The candidate 195556_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:21:34.31 +22:00:47.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195567_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068
The candidate 195567_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195575_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068
The candidate 195575_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195577_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068
The candidate 195577_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:00.35 +22:07:02.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195578_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068
The candidate 195578_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195582_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068
The candidate 195582_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:22.35 +21:31:48.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195584_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068
The candidate 195584_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195588_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068
The candidate 195588_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:14:32.18 +21:40:06.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195590_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068
The candidate 195590_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195603_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068
The candidate 195603_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195604_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068
The candidate 195604_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195605_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068
The candidate 195605_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:32:01.85 +19:06:40.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195607_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068
The candidate 195607_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195611_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068
The candidate 195611_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:08:21.18 +24:30:46.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195614_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068
The candidate 195614_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195615_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068
The candidate 195615_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:26.62 +25:01:10.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195616_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068
The candidate 195616_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:25:22.49 +24:00:03.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195619_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068
The candidate 195619_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:21:54.99 +25:39:56.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195622_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068
The candidate 195622_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195623_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068
The candidate 195623_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:33.02 +24:41:31.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195624_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068
The candidate 195624_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195625_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068
The candidate 195625_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195628_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068
The candidate 195628_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:39:58.76 +18:06:23.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195630_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068
Preparing report for the candidate 195630_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195631_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068
Preparing report for the candidate 195631_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195632_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068
Preparing report for the candidate 195632_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195697_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068
The candidate 195697_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:19.25 +24:07:14.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195699_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068
The candidate 195699_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195706_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068
The candidate 195706_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:25.17 +22:38:50.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195757_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068
The candidate 195757_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:25.41 +25:56:20.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195769_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068
Preparing report for the candidate 195769_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195788_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068
The candidate 195788_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:32:08.85 +23:56:51.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195797_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068
The candidate 195797_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:11:55.65 +22:17:42.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195803_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068
The candidate 195803_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:15.38 +21:47:41.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195805_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068
The candidate 195805_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:45.96 +25:33:06.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195808_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068
The candidate 195808_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:14.89 +20:00:16.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195813_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068
The candidate 195813_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:50.90 +18:51:18.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195816_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068
The candidate 195816_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:31:54.31 +24:32:03.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195826_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068
The candidate 195826_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:55.46 +21:31:08.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195843_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068
Preparing report for the candidate 195843_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195853_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068
The candidate 195853_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:13.77 +20:22:55.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195855_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068
The candidate 195855_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:11:03.00 +18:51:17.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195869_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068
The candidate 195869_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:20:30.49 +20:05:39.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195870_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068
The candidate 195870_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:20.24 +24:08:07.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195887_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068
The candidate 195887_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:14:40.69 +20:31:56.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195912_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068
The candidate 195912_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:11.03 +20:06:30.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195916_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068
The candidate 195916_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:22:13.61 +22:40:18.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195920_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068
The candidate 195920_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:08.60 +25:49:45.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195921_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068
The candidate 195921_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:22:30.31 +22:57:31.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195922_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068
The candidate 195922_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:25:02.75 +19:56:33.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195926_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068
The candidate 195926_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:22.91 +18:10:08.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195937_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068
The candidate 195937_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:09.08 +23:28:11.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195943_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068
The candidate 195943_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:31:02.45 +25:10:28.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195946_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068
The candidate 195946_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:51.76 +20:05:37.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195947_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068
The candidate 195947_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:27:24.69 +19:09:59.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195958_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068
The candidate 195958_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:10:01.69 +21:27:58.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195965_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068
The candidate 195965_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:11:33.61 +22:39:38.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195969_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068
The candidate 195969_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:27:03.72 +20:16:02.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195975_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068
The candidate 195975_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:40.68 +21:21:31.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195997_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068
Preparing report for the candidate 195997_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195999_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068
The candidate 195999_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:38:26.57 +21:32:35.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196008_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068
The candidate 196008_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196009_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068
The candidate 196009_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:15.75 +25:49:11.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196013_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068
The candidate 196013_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196017_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068
The candidate 196017_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:10:37.91 +19:20:29.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196026_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068
The candidate 196026_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:24:29.41 +18:53:46.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196029_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068
The candidate 196029_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:30:28.05 +25:27:44.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196030_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068
The candidate 196030_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196050_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068
The candidate 196050_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:33:32.94 +25:09:36.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196060_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068
The candidate 196060_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:11:01.44 +18:18:03.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196065_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068
The candidate 196065_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:19:55.87 +20:49:15.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196068_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068
The candidate 196068_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196073_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068
The candidate 196073_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:15:57.01 +22:00:57.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196079_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068
The candidate 196079_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196092_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068
The candidate 196092_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:14.39 +19:32:10.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196093_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068
The candidate 196093_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:37.91 +24:18:39.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196100_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068
The candidate 196100_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:24.42 +24:47:36.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196103_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068
Preparing report for the candidate 196103_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196115_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068
The candidate 196115_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:08:42.65 +20:49:19.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196119_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068
The candidate 196119_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:15:50.92 +26:08:29.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196150_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068
The candidate 196150_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:20:30.15 +22:26:07.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196154_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068
The candidate 196154_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:37.74 +23:35:53.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196161_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068
The candidate 196161_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:29:33.89 +23:02:48.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196167_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068
The candidate 196167_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:10:30.40 +17:57:54.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196179_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068
The candidate 196179_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:11:16.14 +20:09:10.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196182_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068
The candidate 196182_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:14:39.47 +25:20:31.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196184_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068
The candidate 196184_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:11:39.82 +20:41:32.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196185_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068
The candidate 196185_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:18:22.82 +17:52:04.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196186_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068
The candidate 196186_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196193_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068
The candidate 196193_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196200_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068
The candidate 196200_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196212_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068
Preparing report for the candidate 196212_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196225_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068
The candidate 196225_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:10:00.20 +23:42:00.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196228_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068
The candidate 196228_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:04.55 +23:31:30.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196230_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068
The candidate 196230_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:08:00.54 +22:06:59.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196238_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068
The candidate 196238_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:19:37.06 +24:45:28.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196239_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068
The candidate 196239_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:18:58.98 +25:56:57.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196245_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068
The candidate 196245_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:43.80 +24:30:19.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196250_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068
The candidate 196250_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196274_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068
The candidate 196274_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:22.41 +21:13:56.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196327_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068
The candidate 196327_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:16:15.28 +18:20:29.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196342_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068
The candidate 196342_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196354_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068
The candidate 196354_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196364_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068
The candidate 196364_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196375_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068
The candidate 196375_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:15:08.05 +21:35:21.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196397_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068
The candidate 196397_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:10:10.93 +18:56:49.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196404_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068
The candidate 196404_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:37.36 +21:41:21.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196428_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068
Preparing report for the candidate 196428_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196444_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068
The candidate 196444_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:25:32.26 +20:28:38.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196504_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068
The candidate 196504_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196518_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068
The candidate 196518_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196520_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068
The candidate 196520_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196528_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068
The candidate 196528_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196546_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068
The candidate 196546_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196554_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068
The candidate 196554_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196571_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068
The candidate 196571_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196577_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068
The candidate 196577_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:19:07.14 +24:22:09.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196578_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068
The candidate 196578_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196582_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068
The candidate 196582_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196586_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068
The candidate 196586_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196589_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068
The candidate 196589_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196608_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068
The candidate 196608_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196613_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068
The candidate 196613_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:19:55.52 +25:44:07.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196619_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068
The candidate 196619_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196633_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068
The candidate 196633_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 165521_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068
The candidate 165521_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_22-14-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0068 did not pass the final checks
