This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_044126_TTUQ1b1x1_1497158_f1iXBj52
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 10.4029 2461170.9029 10.68 16:47:30.32 -20:48:40.7
359.17417 15.44150 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 4.7 pix
The object was found in VSX22" Gaia DR3 4127356888766482304
Type: RRAB
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
19.970 G 20.820 G 0.548020000000
The object was found in astcheck.21 Lutetia 1 -2 2 10.7 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:47:30.32 -20:48:40.7: 15.13 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:47:30.32 -20:48:40.7: 15.32 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 4127356888766482304,2461170.9029,10.68,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 4127356888766482304 20260510.4029 10.68CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 10.4029 2461170.9029 11.84 17:17:05.81 -16:49:12.6
6.70508 12.05873 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.0" and 5.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.119 Althaea 9 -3 9 12.4 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 17:17:05.81 -16:49:12.6: 14.09 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 17:17:05.81 -16:49:12.6: 14.22 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.16 +/- 0.09
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461170.9029,11.84,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260510.4029 11.84CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 10.4029 2461170.9029 11.76 16:45:32.13 -22:51:23.8
357.21450 14.54205 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 4.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.24 Themis 0 -1 1 12.0 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:45:32.13 -22:51:23.8: 15.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:45:32.13 -22:51:23.8: 15.28 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461170.9029,11.76,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260510.4029 11.76CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 10.4029 2461170.9029 12.12 17:01:28.30 -14:28:45.1
6.53387 16.48575 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 4.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.48 Doris 2 -0 2 12.2 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 17:01:28.30 -14:28:45.1: 15.39 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 17:01:28.30 -14:28:45.1: 15.52 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461170.9029,12.12,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260510.4029 12.12CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 10.4029 2461170.9029 12.58 16:55:21.61 -22:00:19.9
359.33681 13.26354 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 8.3" and 3.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 16:55:21.61 -22:00:19.9 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:55:21.61 -22:00:19.9: 13.76 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:55:21.61 -22:00:19.9: 14.24 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.93 +/- 0.10
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461170.9029,12.58,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260510.4029 12.58CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 10.4029 2461170.9029 12.58 17:11:31.59 -22:37:51.4
1.06158 9.87022 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 4.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.121 Hermione 2 -2 3 12.9 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 17:11:31.59 -22:37:51.4: 15.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 17:11:31.59 -22:37:51.4: 15.21 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461170.9029,12.58,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260510.4029 12.58CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 10.4029 2461170.9029 12.83 16:52:09.53 -16:00:34.7
3.87156 17.43614 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 4.7" and 4.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ATO J253.0438-16.0142 | 16:52:10.50 -16:00:51.3 (Gaia DR3) | dubious (ATLAS) | (ATLAS) | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:52:09.53 -16:00:34.7: 13.95 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:52:09.53 -16:00:34.7: 13.86 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.89 +/- 0.06
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J253.0438-16.0142,2461170.9029,12.83,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J253.0438-16.0142 20260510.4029 12.83CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 10.4029 2461170.9029 13.31 17:20:23.51 -15:40:34.9
8.12649 12.02373 galactic Ser Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.8" and 4.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.159 Aemilia 4 2 5 13.5 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 17:20:23.51 -15:40:34.9: 15.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 17:20:23.51 -15:40:34.9: 15.31 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 10.4029* 17 20 23.51 -15 40 34.9 13.3 U Ser 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461170.9029,13.31,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260510.4029 13.31CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 10.4029 2461170.9029 13.82 16:46:27.17 -15:50:29.1
3.16064 18.64157 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 4.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.364 Isara 0 -1 1 13.6 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:46:27.17 -15:50:29.1: 15.40 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:46:27.17 -15:50:29.1: 15.55 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461170.9029,13.82,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260510.4029 13.82CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 10.4029 2461170.9029 12.87 17:16:23.73 -18:02:59.6
5.56444 11.51702 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 4.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ATO J259.0955-18.0475 | 17:16:25.00 -18:03:13.7 (Gaia DR3) | dubious (ATLAS) | (ATLAS) | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 17:16:23.73 -18:02:59.6: 13.77 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 17:16:23.73 -18:02:59.6: 13.84 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.80 +/- 0.07
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J259.0955-18.0475,2461170.9029,12.87,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J259.0955-18.0475 20260510.4029 12.87CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461148.85630580 18.04.2026 08:32:54.821 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
First image: 2461148.85630580 18.04.2026 08:32:54.821 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
Last image: 2461170.90320980 10.05.2026 09:40:27.327 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_044126_TTUQ1b1x1_1497158_f1iXBj52/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 11
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.11
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 6613
Objects passed selection criteria: 6613
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 6214.25
Average stars matched: 5825.25 (93.7402 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 112692 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed May 6 12:14:36 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-43-g0c21e0c3
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun May 10 04:42:36 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461148.85630580 18.04.2026 08:32:54.821 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
First image: 2461148.85630580 18.04.2026 08:32:54.821 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
Last image: 2461170.90320980 10.05.2026 09:40:27.327 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_044126_TTUQ1b1x1_1497158_f1iXBj52/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 78
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.73
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 38 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 71418
Objects passed selection criteria: 71314
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 60672
Average stars matched: 55116.2 (90.843 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1923860 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed May 6 12:14:36 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-43-g0c21e0c3
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun May 10 04:46:09 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_044126_TTUQ1b1x1_1497158_f1iXBj52/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-39-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0093.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_044126_TTUQ1b1x1_1497158_f1iXBj52/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_044126_TTUQ1b1x1_1497158_f1iXBj52/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-39-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0093.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_044126_TTUQ1b1x1_1497158_f1iXBj52/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461170.90254661
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits'
wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits'
wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-39-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0093.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-39-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0093.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-39-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0093.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-39-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0093.fits'
wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
Image size: 937.6'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:53:14.795 -17:57:56.98 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-39-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0093.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-39-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:53:10.321 -17:59:22.84 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:53:14.795 -17:57:56.98
Second-epoch image center 16:53:10.321 -17:59:22.84
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0297 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:53:12.259 -17:59:21.70 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:53:14.795 -17:57:56.98
Second-epoch image center 16:53:12.259 -17:59:21.70
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0256 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 16:53:10.321 -17:59:22.84
Second-epoch second image center 16:53:12.259 -17:59:21.70
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00769 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits &> /tmp/tmp.kVikpVfgJ9
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits &> /tmp/tmp.yiZ55xA6JR
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_044126_TTUQ1b1x1_1497158_f1iXBj52/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-39-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0093.fits &> /tmp/tmp.u0yiainGpL
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_044126_TTUQ1b1x1_1497158_f1iXBj52/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-39-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_044126_TTUQ1b1x1_1497158_f1iXBj52/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094.fits &> /tmp/tmp.jAhIOFaQbT
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_044126_TTUQ1b1x1_1497158_f1iXBj52/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits and wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits and wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits and wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits) and catalog (wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 6602 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 244.9581 to 261.8337 deg, Dec -23.2408 to -12.5108 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 244.9581 to 261.8337 deg, Dec -23.2408 to -12.5108 deg
Loaded 6041 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4269 out of 4396 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4396 out of 6602 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.617200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.617200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.11
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.51
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.51
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 6602 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 244.9581 to 261.8337 deg, Dec -23.2408 to -12.5108 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 244.9581 to 261.8337 deg, Dec -23.2408 to -12.5108 deg
Loaded 6041 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4269 out of 4396 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4396 out of 6602 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits (aperture=6.3)
Read 7698 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 244.4593 to 261.6825 deg, Dec -23.5868 to -12.1003 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 244.4593 to 261.6825 deg, Dec -23.5868 to -12.1003 deg
Loaded 6563 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4621 out of 4787 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4787 out of 7698 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits (aperture=5.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 11 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
2.2 pix Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
4.5 pix fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-39-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
4.5 pix fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.5 mag. Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
14.6 mag. Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
13.9 mag. fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-39-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
13.9 mag. fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.9 (SNR ) 11.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.kVikpVfgJ9 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_044126_TTUQ1b1x1_1497158_f1iXBj52/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=378, passed=6602
Got 6602 stars (including 6214 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6602 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.2 to -12.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 921 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6406 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.2 to -12.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6406 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6406 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.63"
Excluding outliers - 947 stars left (next iteration limit 1041)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits -region wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.yiZ55xA6JR (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_044126_TTUQ1b1x1_1497158_f1iXBj52/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=483, passed=7698
Got 7698 stars (including 7205 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7698 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.6 to -12.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 926 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7485 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.6 to -12.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7484 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7484 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 944 stars left (next iteration limit 1038)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits -region wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.u0yiainGpL (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_044126_TTUQ1b1x1_1497158_f1iXBj52/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_044126_TTUQ1b1x1_1497158_f1iXBj52/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-39-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0093.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_044126_TTUQ1b1x1_1497158_f1iXBj52/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-39-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_044126_TTUQ1b1x1_1497158_f1iXBj52/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-39-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_044126_TTUQ1b1x1_1497158_f1iXBj52/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-39-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_044126_TTUQ1b1x1_1497158_f1iXBj52/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-39-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_044126_TTUQ1b1x1_1497158_f1iXBj52/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-39-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-39-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-39-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-39-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0093.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-39-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0093.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-39-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0093.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-39-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0093.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-39-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_044126_TTUQ1b1x1_1497158_f1iXBj52/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-39-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-39-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0093.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=373, passed=5447
Got 5447 stars (including 5073 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-39-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0093.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5447 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 917 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.65"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5307 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.66"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5305 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.66"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5305 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.66"
Excluding outliers - 938 stars left (next iteration limit 1032)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-39-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0093.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-39-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0093.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_044126_TTUQ1b1x1_1497158_f1iXBj52/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-39-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0093.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-39-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0093.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-39-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0093.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.jAhIOFaQbT (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_044126_TTUQ1b1x1_1497158_f1iXBj52/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_044126_TTUQ1b1x1_1497158_f1iXBj52/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_044126_TTUQ1b1x1_1497158_f1iXBj52/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_044126_TTUQ1b1x1_1497158_f1iXBj52/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_044126_TTUQ1b1x1_1497158_f1iXBj52/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_044126_TTUQ1b1x1_1497158_f1iXBj52/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_044126_TTUQ1b1x1_1497158_f1iXBj52/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_044126_TTUQ1b1x1_1497158_f1iXBj52/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=354, passed=5377
Got 5377 stars (including 5022 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5377 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 919 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.68"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5238 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.68"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5238 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.68"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5238 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.69"
Excluding outliers - 941 stars left (next iteration limit 1035)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_044126_TTUQ1b1x1_1497158_f1iXBj52/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-39-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-39-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0093.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_044126_TTUQ1b1x1_1497158_f1iXBj52/wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-39-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0093.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_044126_TTUQ1b1x1_1497158_f1iXBj52/wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Oph-07-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 17:03:42.66 -16:40:29.8: 10.92 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:32:35.93 -21:17:20.0: 11.21 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 17:06:42.30 -19:17:48.5: 11.02 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 17:25:16.58 -16:21:30.6: 11.94 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 17:24:06.36 -18:06:40.1: 11.71 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:47:30.32 -20:48:40.7: 15.13 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 17:03:42.66 -16:40:29.8: 11.04 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:47:30.32 -20:48:40.7: 15.32 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.98 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 17:06:42.30 -19:17:48.5: 11.13 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 17:24:06.36 -18:06:40.1: 11.81 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:03:42.66 -16:40:29.8: ref_mag=10.98 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.0774 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.08 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.76 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:06:42.30 -19:17:48.5: ref_mag=11.08 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.4346 delta=-0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:24:06.36 -18:06:40.1: ref_mag=11.76 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.4882 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:32:35.93 -21:17:20.0: 11.25 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 17:25:16.58 -16:21:30.6: 12.05 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.23 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:32:35.93 -21:17:20.0: ref_mag=11.23 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.4104 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.99 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:25:16.58 -16:21:30.6: ref_mag=11.99 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.6942 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out21509.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 7s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21502_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094
The candidate 21502_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21503_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094
The candidate 21503_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21505_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094
The candidate 21505_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21509_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094
Preparing report for the candidate 21509_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21512_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094
The candidate 21512_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:09:39.98 -19:08:04.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21513_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094
The candidate 21513_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21514_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094
The candidate 21514_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:18:06.16 -16:58:42.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21516_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094
The candidate 21516_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:08:22.38 -17:36:26.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21523_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094
The candidate 21523_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20284_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094
The candidate 20284_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:34:15.43 -17:09:39.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03060_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094
The candidate 03060_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:07:56.45 -18:48:39.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 9s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Oph-07-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
16:47:30.32 -20:48:40.7
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_044126_TTUQ1b1x1_1497158_f1iXBj52/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-39-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0093.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_044126_TTUQ1b1x1_1497158_f1iXBj52/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_044126_TTUQ1b1x1_1497158_f1iXBj52/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-39-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0093.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_044126_TTUQ1b1x1_1497158_f1iXBj52/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-39-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-39-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0093.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
Image size: 937.6'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:53:14.795 -17:57:56.98 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-39-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0093.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-39-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:53:10.321 -17:59:22.84 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:53:14.795 -17:57:56.98
Second-epoch image center 16:53:10.321 -17:59:22.84
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0297 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:53:12.259 -17:59:21.70 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:53:14.795 -17:57:56.98
Second-epoch image center 16:53:12.259 -17:59:21.70
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0256 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 16:53:10.321 -17:59:22.84
Second-epoch second image center 16:53:12.259 -17:59:21.70
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00769 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits &> /tmp/tmp.6NhqOEJrCk
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits &> /tmp/tmp.kBcYlwKA6n
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_044126_TTUQ1b1x1_1497158_f1iXBj52/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-39-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0093.fits &> /tmp/tmp.UAxru6wH10
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_044126_TTUQ1b1x1_1497158_f1iXBj52/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-39-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_044126_TTUQ1b1x1_1497158_f1iXBj52/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094.fits &> /tmp/tmp.WcMeDAqySB
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_044126_TTUQ1b1x1_1497158_f1iXBj52/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits and wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits and wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits and wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits) and catalog (wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 76360 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 244.9179 to 261.8708 deg, Dec -23.2533 to -12.4729 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 244.9179 to 261.8708 deg, Dec -23.2533 to -12.4729 deg
Loaded 6087 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4580 out of 5201 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5201 out of 76360 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.389800
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.389800
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.73
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.66
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.66
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 76360 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 244.9179 to 261.8708 deg, Dec -23.2533 to -12.4729 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 244.9179 to 261.8708 deg, Dec -23.2533 to -12.4729 deg
Loaded 6087 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4580 out of 5201 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5201 out of 76360 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits (aperture=4.4)
Read 90958 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 244.4593 to 261.6928 deg, Dec -23.6085 to -12.1003 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 244.4593 to 261.6928 deg, Dec -23.6085 to -12.1003 deg
Loaded 6585 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4745 out of 5431 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5431 out of 90958 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits (aperture=4.4)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 64 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
2.1 pix Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
3.5 pix fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-39-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
3.6 pix fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094.fits
2.0 pix wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.7 mag. Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
14.8 mag. Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-39-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.0 (SNR ) 13.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.6NhqOEJrCk (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_044126_TTUQ1b1x1_1497158_f1iXBj52/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=4634, passed=76351
Got 76351 stars (including 71611 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 76351 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 949 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 921 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 74166 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 949 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 74162 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 74161 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Excluding outliers - 949 stars left (next iteration limit 1043)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits -region wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.kBcYlwKA6n (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_044126_TTUQ1b1x1_1497158_f1iXBj52/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=5325, passed=90947
Got 90947 stars (including 85457 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 90947 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 331 to 391 (Dec -23.6 to -12.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 948 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 928 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 89497 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 331 to 391 (Dec -23.6 to -12.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 89499 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 89499 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 947 stars left (next iteration limit 1041)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits -region wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.UAxru6wH10 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_044126_TTUQ1b1x1_1497158_f1iXBj52/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_044126_TTUQ1b1x1_1497158_f1iXBj52/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-39-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0093.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_044126_TTUQ1b1x1_1497158_f1iXBj52/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-39-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_044126_TTUQ1b1x1_1497158_f1iXBj52/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-39-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_044126_TTUQ1b1x1_1497158_f1iXBj52/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-39-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_044126_TTUQ1b1x1_1497158_f1iXBj52/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-39-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_044126_TTUQ1b1x1_1497158_f1iXBj52/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-39-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-39-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-39-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-39-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0093.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-39-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0093.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-39-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0093.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-39-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0093.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-39-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_044126_TTUQ1b1x1_1497158_f1iXBj52/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-39-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-39-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0093.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=4281, passed=40114
Got 40114 stars (including 35786 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-39-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0093.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 40114 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.6 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 922 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.67"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39326 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.67"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.6 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39329 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.66"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39329 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.66"
Excluding outliers - 945 stars left (next iteration limit 1040)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-39-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0093.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-39-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0093.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_044126_TTUQ1b1x1_1497158_f1iXBj52/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-39-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0093.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-39-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0093.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-39-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0093.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.WcMeDAqySB (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_044126_TTUQ1b1x1_1497158_f1iXBj52/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_044126_TTUQ1b1x1_1497158_f1iXBj52/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_044126_TTUQ1b1x1_1497158_f1iXBj52/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_044126_TTUQ1b1x1_1497158_f1iXBj52/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_044126_TTUQ1b1x1_1497158_f1iXBj52/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_044126_TTUQ1b1x1_1497158_f1iXBj52/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_044126_TTUQ1b1x1_1497158_f1iXBj52/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_044126_TTUQ1b1x1_1497158_f1iXBj52/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=4314, passed=38855
Got 38855 stars (including 34499 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 38855 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.5 to -12.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 948 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 925 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.68"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38177 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.67"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.5 to -12.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38177 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.67"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38177 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.66"
Excluding outliers - 945 stars left (next iteration limit 1040)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_044126_TTUQ1b1x1_1497158_f1iXBj52/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-39-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_044126_TTUQ1b1x1_1497158_f1iXBj52/wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-39-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_044126_TTUQ1b1x1_1497158_f1iXBj52/wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Oph-07-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 17:15:12.23 -16:13:04.1: 13.36 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 17:07:33.35 -21:24:16.2: 13.31 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 17:18:50.14 -20:51:56.6: 13.58 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 17:10:12.18 -19:44:04.6: 13.33 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:50:30.79 -17:36:45.5: 13.37 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 17:08:25.79 -20:29:58.9: 13.28 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 17:15:41.48 -20:37:54.1: 13.04 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:56:26.94 -19:08:47.6: 12.99 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 17:15:12.23 -16:13:04.1: 13.53 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 17:18:50.14 -20:51:56.6: 13.57 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 17:10:12.18 -19:44:04.6: 13.43 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.44 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 17:07:33.35 -21:24:16.2: 13.20 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:50:30.79 -17:36:45.5: 13.06 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:15:12.23 -16:13:04.1: ref_mag=13.44 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.3067 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.58 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.24 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.39 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.14 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:18:50.14 -20:51:56.6: ref_mag=13.58 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.0777 delta=0.50 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:10:12.18 -19:44:04.6: ref_mag=13.39 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.2873 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:07:33.35 -21:24:16.2: ref_mag=13.24 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.1797 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:50:30.79 -17:36:45.5: ref_mag=13.14 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6217 delta=-0.48 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 17:06:59.81 -20:54:46.6: 12.62 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:40:16.43 -19:55:33.4: 13.29 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 17:08:25.79 -20:29:58.9: 13.43 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.36 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:08:25.79 -20:29:58.9: ref_mag=13.36 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=12.7932 delta=0.56 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:56:26.94 -19:08:47.6: 12.97 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.98 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:56:26.94 -19:08:47.6: ref_mag=12.98 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.8179 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 17:15:41.48 -20:37:54.1: 13.09 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.07 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:15:41.48 -20:37:54.1: ref_mag=13.07 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.9960 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 17:06:59.81 -20:54:46.6: 12.70 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:40:16.43 -19:55:33.4: 13.09 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.66 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:06:59.81 -20:54:46.6: ref_mag=12.66 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6826 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.15 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:40:16.43 -19:55:33.4: ref_mag=13.15 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.7040 delta=0.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:58:38.61 -18:48:55.5: 12.71 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 17:17:38.93 -17:41:58.2: 12.97 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:30:19.26 -15:38:31.0: 12.70 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 17:12:35.23 -19:09:24.3: 12.49 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 17:17:05.81 -16:49:12.6: 14.09 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:58:38.61 -18:48:55.5: 12.67 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.69 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:58:38.61 -18:48:55.5: ref_mag=12.69 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7024 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 17:17:38.93 -17:41:58.2: 13.20 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.08 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:17:38.93 -17:41:58.2: ref_mag=13.08 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.6113 delta=0.47 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:45:32.13 -22:51:23.8: 15.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 17:01:28.30 -14:28:45.1: 15.39 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:55:21.61 -22:00:19.9: 13.76 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 17:11:31.59 -22:37:51.4: 15.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:30:19.26 -15:38:31.0: 12.38 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 17:12:35.23 -19:09:24.3: 12.65 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.48 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.58 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:30:19.26 -15:38:31.0: ref_mag=12.48 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.5457 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:12:35.23 -19:09:24.3: ref_mag=12.58 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.5915 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 17:17:05.81 -16:49:12.6: 14.22 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.16 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 17:17:05.81 -16:49:12.6: ref_mag=14.16 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=11.8441 delta=2.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:52:09.53 -16:00:34.7: 13.95 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:45:32.13 -22:51:23.8: 15.28 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 17:01:28.30 -14:28:45.1: 15.52 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:55:21.61 -22:00:19.9: 14.24 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.93 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 16:55:21.61 -22:00:19.9: ref_mag=13.93 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=12.5767 delta=1.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 17:11:31.59 -22:37:51.4: 15.21 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:52:09.53 -16:00:34.7: 13.86 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.89 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 16:52:09.53 -16:00:34.7: ref_mag=13.89 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=12.8266 delta=1.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 17:13:06.15 -21:13:35.7: 14.40 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 17:20:23.51 -15:40:34.9: 15.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:46:27.17 -15:50:29.1: 15.40 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 17:13:06.15 -21:13:35.7: 14.57 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 17:20:23.51 -15:40:34.9: 15.31 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.48 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 17:13:06.15 -21:13:35.7: ref_mag=14.48 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=12.9024 delta=1.58 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:46:27.17 -15:50:29.1: 15.55 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:26:04.12 -12:33:20.6: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:26:04.12 -12:33:20.6: 11.00 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:26:04.12 -12:33:20.6: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 17:25:41.17 -14:14:58.5: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 17:25:41.17 -14:14:58.5: 12.64 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:25:41.17 -14:14:58.5: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 17:02:32.15 -16:22:25.3: 13.26 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 17:16:23.73 -18:02:59.6: 13.77 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 17:02:32.15 -16:22:25.3: 13.46 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.35 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:02:32.15 -16:22:25.3: ref_mag=13.35 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.1015 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 17:16:23.73 -18:02:59.6: 13.84 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.80 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 17:16:23.73 -18:02:59.6: ref_mag=13.80 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=12.8646 delta=0.94 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 17:25:19.22 -13:55:39.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 17:25:19.22 -13:55:39.9: 13.26 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:25:19.22 -13:55:39.9: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 17:04:39.14 -19:21:21.0: 13.20 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 17:05:51.11 -19:09:09.3: 12.49 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 17:04:39.14 -19:21:21.0: 13.27 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.24 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:04:39.14 -19:21:21.0: ref_mag=13.24 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.6710 delta=0.57 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 17:05:51.11 -19:09:09.3: 12.64 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.57 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:05:51.11 -19:09:09.3: ref_mag=12.57 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.2865 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 17:16:19.39 -20:07:42.6: 13.02 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 17:16:19.39 -20:07:42.6: 13.04 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.03 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:16:19.39 -20:07:42.6: ref_mag=13.03 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.6725 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out108336.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out108285.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out108296.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out108298.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out108312.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out108314.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out108318.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out108348.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out108376.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out90324.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 20s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 8s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108159_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094
The candidate 108159_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108168_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094
The candidate 108168_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108172_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094
The candidate 108172_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:20:16.25 -22:23:35.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108180_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094
The candidate 108180_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:21:29.55 -18:31:21.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108182_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094
The candidate 108182_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108187_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094
The candidate 108187_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108192_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094
The candidate 108192_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108194_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094
The candidate 108194_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:03:30.19 -20:27:58.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108195_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094
The candidate 108195_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108210_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094
The candidate 108210_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:20:35.81 -22:18:16.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108215_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094
The candidate 108215_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108223_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094
The candidate 108223_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:15:32.30 -21:11:03.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108225_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094
The candidate 108225_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108230_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094
The candidate 108230_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:16:51.53 -19:14:12.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108231_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094
The candidate 108231_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108236_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094
The candidate 108236_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108239_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094
The candidate 108239_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108251_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094
The candidate 108251_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:07:28.15 -22:54:05.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108254_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094
The candidate 108254_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:19:45.01 -22:01:13.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108257_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094
The candidate 108257_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:59:53.37 -23:10:28.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108260_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094
The candidate 108260_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108263_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094
The candidate 108263_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108269_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094
The candidate 108269_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108276_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094
The candidate 108276_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:31:47.08 -13:49:52.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108278_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094
The candidate 108278_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108279_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094
The candidate 108279_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108285_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094
Preparing report for the candidate 108285_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108288_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094
The candidate 108288_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:47:30.30 -20:48:40.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108296_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094
Preparing report for the candidate 108296_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108298_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094
Preparing report for the candidate 108298_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108305_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094
The candidate 108305_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108312_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094
Preparing report for the candidate 108312_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108314_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094
Preparing report for the candidate 108314_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108318_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094
Preparing report for the candidate 108318_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108325_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094
The candidate 108325_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:06:29.54 -22:41:59.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108335_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094
The candidate 108335_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:11:46.11 -18:21:00.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108336_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094
The candidate 108336_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:13:06.15 -21:13:35.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.90, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.88)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.707 4115829570204316416 258.27578557587 -21.22584631290 12.6358 10.8652 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.707#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108348_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094
Preparing report for the candidate 108348_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108362_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094
The candidate 108362_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:12:25.35 -14:20:28.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108376_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094
Preparing report for the candidate 108376_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90398_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094
The candidate 90398_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:11:23.69 -22:50:11.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87154_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094
The candidate 87154_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87647_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094
The candidate 87647_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91435_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094
The candidate 91435_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:25:26.12 -16:37:06.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91358_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094
The candidate 91358_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:10:51.62 -18:32:12.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 41742_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094
The candidate 41742_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:20:14.99 -17:55:01.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50158_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094
The candidate 50158_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:18:05.99 -16:58:41.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75669_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094
The candidate 75669_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90324_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094
Preparing report for the candidate 90324_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50122_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094
The candidate 50122_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:34:15.43 -17:09:39.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68411_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094
The candidate 68411_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:11:38.80 -15:05:19.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90243_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094
The candidate 90243_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:42:08.06 -20:30:49.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 41466_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094
The candidate 41466_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:06:31.63 -18:05:21.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90163_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094
The candidate 90163_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:25:45.51 -15:48:18.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89969_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094
The candidate 89969_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 48402_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094
The candidate 48402_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:15:49.15 -17:14:09.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 29576_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094
The candidate 29576_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34085_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094
The candidate 34085_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:07:56.44 -18:48:39.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01697_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094
The candidate 01697_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:18:55.22 -22:43:32.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31340_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094
The candidate 31340_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 13120_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094
The candidate 13120_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:09:30.05 -21:07:01.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31039_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094
The candidate 31039_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:09:39.87 -19:08:03.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 42070_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094
The candidate 42070_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:25:37.76 -18:06:10.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21368_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094
The candidate 21368_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_04-40-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0094 did not pass the final checks
