This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_012726_TTUQ1b1x1_1631195_45IiMZqq
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 10.2682 2461170.7682 13.29 11:45:58.39 +13:27:58.3
251.46446 69.49396 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 7.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.326 Tamara -1 -0 1 12.9 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 11:45:58.39 +13:27:58.3: 16.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits at 11:45:58.39 +13:27:58.3: 16.16 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 10.2682* 11 45 58.39 +13 27 58.3 13.3 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461170.7682,13.29,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260510.2682 13.29CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 10.2682 2461170.7682 13.44 11:29:23.27 +11:33:41.5
247.89302 65.23512 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 7.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.595 Polyxena -1 0 1 13.6 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 11:29:23.27 +11:33:41.5: 16.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits at 11:29:23.27 +11:33:41.5: 16.17 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 10.2682* 11 29 23.27 +11 33 41.5 13.4 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461170.7682,13.44,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260510.2682 13.44CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 10.2682 2461170.7682 14.63 11:36:23.04 +15:41:05.6
242.41187 69.16099 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 7.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.680 Genoveva -0 0 0 14.7 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 11:36:23.04 +15:41:05.6: 16.20 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits at 11:36:23.04 +15:41:05.6: 16.21 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 10.2682* 11 36 23.04 +15 41 05.6 14.6 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461170.7682,14.63,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260510.2682 14.63CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 10.2682 2461170.7682 14.84 11:24:35.92 +09:51:11.3
248.96337 63.21369 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 7.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.627 Charis -2 -0 2 15.1 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 11:24:35.92 +09:51:11.3: 16.06 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits at 11:24:35.92 +09:51:11.3: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 10.2682* 11 24 35.92 +09 51 11.3 14.8 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461170.7682,14.84,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260510.2682 14.84CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461093.84038209 22.02.2026 08:09:59.013 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
First image: 2461093.84038209 22.02.2026 08:09:59.013 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Last image: 2461170.76856146 10.05.2026 06:26:33.710 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_012726_TTUQ1b1x1_1631195_45IiMZqq/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 1
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.58
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 5792
Objects passed selection criteria: 5789
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 5275.5
Average stars matched: 5150.5 (97.6306 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 111696 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed May 6 12:14:36 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-43-g0c21e0c3
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun May 10 01:28:31 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461093.84038209 22.02.2026 08:09:59.013 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
First image: 2461093.84038209 22.02.2026 08:09:59.013 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Last image: 2461170.76856146 10.05.2026 06:26:33.710 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_012726_TTUQ1b1x1_1631195_45IiMZqq/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 26
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.31
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 9 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 29634
Objects passed selection criteria: 29572
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 27520.5
Average stars matched: 26620.2 (96.7288 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 131540 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed May 6 12:14:36 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-43-g0c21e0c3
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun May 10 01:29:32 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_012726_TTUQ1b1x1_1631195_45IiMZqq/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-25-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0051.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_012726_TTUQ1b1x1_1631195_45IiMZqq/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_012726_TTUQ1b1x1_1631195_45IiMZqq/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-25-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0051.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_012726_TTUQ1b1x1_1631195_45IiMZqq/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461170.76786135
Plate-solving the images
'tocp_transients_list.txt' -> '../tocp_transients_list.txt'
'asassn_transients_list.txt' -> '../asassn_transients_list.txt'
'tns_transients_list.txt' -> '../tns_transients_list.txt'
wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits'
wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits'
wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-25-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0051.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-25-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0051.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-25-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0051.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-25-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0051.fits'
wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:33:20.692 +14:00:05.86 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-25-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0051.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-25-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0051.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:33:20.719 +13:59:25.81 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:33:20.692 +14:00:05.86
Second-epoch image center 11:33:20.719 +13:59:25.81
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0111 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:33:23.672 +13:59:26.79 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:33:20.692 +14:00:05.86
Second-epoch image center 11:33:23.672 +13:59:26.79
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0162 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 11:33:20.719 +13:59:25.81
Second-epoch second image center 11:33:23.672 +13:59:26.79
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01194 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits &> /tmp/tmp.TPuWtAjK1X
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits &> /tmp/tmp.SUbeYAVYzY
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_012726_TTUQ1b1x1_1631195_45IiMZqq/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-25-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0051.fits &> /tmp/tmp.9WWY8vraIA
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_012726_TTUQ1b1x1_1631195_45IiMZqq/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-25-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0051.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_012726_TTUQ1b1x1_1631195_45IiMZqq/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits &> /tmp/tmp.gsw76OFo0r
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_012726_TTUQ1b1x1_1631195_45IiMZqq/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits) and catalog (wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 5845 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 164.9322 to 181.4966 deg, Dec +8.4844 to +19.3112 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 164.9322 to 181.4966 deg, Dec 8.4844 to 19.3112 deg
Loaded 3827 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2957 out of 3146 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3146 out of 5845 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.922700
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.922700
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.58
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.34
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.34
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 5845 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 164.9322 to 181.4966 deg, Dec +8.4844 to +19.3112 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 164.9322 to 181.4966 deg, Dec 8.4844 to 19.3112 deg
Loaded 3827 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2957 out of 3146 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3146 out of 5845 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (aperture=6.4)
Read 5851 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 164.9329 to 181.4972 deg, Dec +8.5231 to +19.3318 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 164.9329 to 181.4972 deg, Dec 8.5231 to 19.3318 deg
Loaded 3815 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2962 out of 3141 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3141 out of 5851 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits (aperture=6.4)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 1 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
2.2 pix Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
2.2 pix fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-25-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0051.fits
2.2 pix fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
15.3 mag. Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-25-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0051.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.0 (SNR ) 12.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.TPuWtAjK1X (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_012726_TTUQ1b1x1_1631195_45IiMZqq/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=451, passed=5845
Got 5845 stars (including 5387 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5845 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 965 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5754 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5755 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5755 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 978 stars left (next iteration limit 1075)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits -region wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.SUbeYAVYzY (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_012726_TTUQ1b1x1_1631195_45IiMZqq/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=436, passed=5851
Got 5851 stars (including 5411 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5851 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 964 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5764 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5763 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5763 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 977 stars left (next iteration limit 1074)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits -region wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.9WWY8vraIA (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_012726_TTUQ1b1x1_1631195_45IiMZqq/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_012726_TTUQ1b1x1_1631195_45IiMZqq/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-25-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0051.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_012726_TTUQ1b1x1_1631195_45IiMZqq/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-25-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0051.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_012726_TTUQ1b1x1_1631195_45IiMZqq/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-25-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0051.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_012726_TTUQ1b1x1_1631195_45IiMZqq/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-25-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0051.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_012726_TTUQ1b1x1_1631195_45IiMZqq/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-25-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0051.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_012726_TTUQ1b1x1_1631195_45IiMZqq/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-25-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0051.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-25-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0051.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-25-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0051.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-25-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0051.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-25-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0051.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-25-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0051.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-25-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0051.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-25-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0051.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_012726_TTUQ1b1x1_1631195_45IiMZqq/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-25-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0051.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-25-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0051.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=298, passed=4809
Got 4809 stars (including 4503 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-25-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0051.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4809 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 964 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4761 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4760 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4760 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Excluding outliers - 971 stars left (next iteration limit 1068)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-25-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0051.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-25-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0051.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_012726_TTUQ1b1x1_1631195_45IiMZqq/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-25-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0051.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-25-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0051.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-25-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0051.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.gsw76OFo0r (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_012726_TTUQ1b1x1_1631195_45IiMZqq/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_012726_TTUQ1b1x1_1631195_45IiMZqq/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_012726_TTUQ1b1x1_1631195_45IiMZqq/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_012726_TTUQ1b1x1_1631195_45IiMZqq/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_012726_TTUQ1b1x1_1631195_45IiMZqq/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_012726_TTUQ1b1x1_1631195_45IiMZqq/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_012726_TTUQ1b1x1_1631195_45IiMZqq/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_012726_TTUQ1b1x1_1631195_45IiMZqq/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=306, passed=4724
Got 4724 stars (including 4413 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4724 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 965 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4670 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4670 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4670 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 972 stars left (next iteration limit 1069)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_012726_TTUQ1b1x1_1631195_45IiMZqq/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-25-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0051.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-25-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0051.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_012726_TTUQ1b1x1_1631195_45IiMZqq/wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-25-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0051.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_012726_TTUQ1b1x1_1631195_45IiMZqq/wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Leo-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04578_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0052
The candidate 04578_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0052 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:23:40.10 +16:51:05.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Leo-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_012726_TTUQ1b1x1_1631195_45IiMZqq/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-25-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0051.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_012726_TTUQ1b1x1_1631195_45IiMZqq/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_012726_TTUQ1b1x1_1631195_45IiMZqq/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-25-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0051.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_012726_TTUQ1b1x1_1631195_45IiMZqq/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-25-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0051.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-25-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0051.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:33:20.692 +14:00:05.86 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-25-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0051.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-25-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0051.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:33:20.719 +13:59:25.81 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:33:20.692 +14:00:05.86
Second-epoch image center 11:33:20.719 +13:59:25.81
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0111 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:33:23.672 +13:59:26.79 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:33:20.692 +14:00:05.86
Second-epoch image center 11:33:23.672 +13:59:26.79
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0162 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 11:33:20.719 +13:59:25.81
Second-epoch second image center 11:33:23.672 +13:59:26.79
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01194 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits &> /tmp/tmp.mZuRmNTJlC
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits &> /tmp/tmp.xro6V8HORU
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_012726_TTUQ1b1x1_1631195_45IiMZqq/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-25-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0051.fits &> /tmp/tmp.WYWkEBYbj6
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_012726_TTUQ1b1x1_1631195_45IiMZqq/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-25-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0051.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_012726_TTUQ1b1x1_1631195_45IiMZqq/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits &> /tmp/tmp.AYGvIpBar1
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_012726_TTUQ1b1x1_1631195_45IiMZqq/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits) and catalog (wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 30089 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 164.9322 to 181.5060 deg, Dec +8.4661 to +19.3314 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 164.9322 to 181.5060 deg, Dec 8.4661 to 19.3314 deg
Loaded 3838 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2863 out of 3171 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3171 out of 30089 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.808900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.808900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.31
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.50
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.50
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 30089 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 164.9322 to 181.5060 deg, Dec +8.4661 to +19.3314 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 164.9322 to 181.5060 deg, Dec 8.4661 to 19.3314 deg
Loaded 3838 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2863 out of 3171 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3171 out of 30089 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (aperture=5.0)
Read 30117 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 164.9329 to 181.5106 deg, Dec +8.4752 to +19.3348 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 164.9329 to 181.5106 deg, Dec 8.4752 to 19.3348 deg
Loaded 3840 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2876 out of 3175 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3175 out of 30117 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits (aperture=5.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 21 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
2.1 pix Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
2.1 pix fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-25-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0051.fits
2.1 pix fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits
2.0 pix wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
15.5 mag. Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
15.2 mag. fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-25-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0051.fits
15.2 mag. fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.2 (SNR ) 14.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.mZuRmNTJlC (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_012726_TTUQ1b1x1_1631195_45IiMZqq/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=15, blended=1260, passed=30074
Got 30074 stars (including 28759 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 30074 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 971 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29780 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29780 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29780 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 978 stars left (next iteration limit 1075)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits -region wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.xro6V8HORU (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_012726_TTUQ1b1x1_1631195_45IiMZqq/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=18, blended=1200, passed=30099
Got 30099 stars (including 28847 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 30099 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 979 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 967 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29751 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 979 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29752 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29752 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 979 stars left (next iteration limit 1076)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits -region wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.WYWkEBYbj6 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_012726_TTUQ1b1x1_1631195_45IiMZqq/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_012726_TTUQ1b1x1_1631195_45IiMZqq/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-25-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0051.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_012726_TTUQ1b1x1_1631195_45IiMZqq/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-25-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0051.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_012726_TTUQ1b1x1_1631195_45IiMZqq/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-25-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0051.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_012726_TTUQ1b1x1_1631195_45IiMZqq/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-25-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0051.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_012726_TTUQ1b1x1_1631195_45IiMZqq/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-25-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0051.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_012726_TTUQ1b1x1_1631195_45IiMZqq/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-25-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0051.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-25-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0051.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-25-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0051.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-25-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0051.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-25-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0051.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-25-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0051.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-25-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0051.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-25-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0051.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_012726_TTUQ1b1x1_1631195_45IiMZqq/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-25-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0051.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-25-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0051.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=839, passed=25238
Got 25238 stars (including 24359 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-25-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0051.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 25238 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 490 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 966 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24926 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 490 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24926 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24927 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 972 stars left (next iteration limit 1069)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-25-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0051.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-25-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0051.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_012726_TTUQ1b1x1_1631195_45IiMZqq/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-25-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0051.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-25-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0051.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-25-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0051.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.AYGvIpBar1 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_012726_TTUQ1b1x1_1631195_45IiMZqq/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_012726_TTUQ1b1x1_1631195_45IiMZqq/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_012726_TTUQ1b1x1_1631195_45IiMZqq/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_012726_TTUQ1b1x1_1631195_45IiMZqq/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_012726_TTUQ1b1x1_1631195_45IiMZqq/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_012726_TTUQ1b1x1_1631195_45IiMZqq/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_012726_TTUQ1b1x1_1631195_45IiMZqq/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_012726_TTUQ1b1x1_1631195_45IiMZqq/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=853, passed=25435
Got 25435 stars (including 24537 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 25435 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 490 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 969 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25113 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 490 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25111 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25111 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 973 stars left (next iteration limit 1070)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_012726_TTUQ1b1x1_1631195_45IiMZqq/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-25-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0051.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_012726_TTUQ1b1x1_1631195_45IiMZqq/wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-25-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0051.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_012726_TTUQ1b1x1_1631195_45IiMZqq/wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Leo-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 11:29:23.27 +11:33:41.5: 16.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 11:45:58.39 +13:27:58.3: 16.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 11:51:17.61 +11:59:15.4: 12.30 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 11:41:37.18 +13:22:04.7: 14.63 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 11:36:23.04 +15:41:05.6: 16.20 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 11:13:57.30 +12:30:21.7: 14.22 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits at 11:29:23.27 +11:33:41.5: 16.17 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits at 11:45:58.39 +13:27:58.3: 16.16 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits at 11:51:17.61 +11:59:15.4: 12.30 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.30 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:51:17.61 +11:59:15.4: ref_mag=12.30 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.7125 delta=-0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 11:24:35.92 +09:51:11.3: 16.06 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits at 11:41:37.18 +13:22:04.7: 14.67 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits at 11:36:23.04 +15:41:05.6: 16.21 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits at 11:13:57.30 +12:30:21.7: 14.24 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.65 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:41:37.18 +13:22:04.7: ref_mag=14.65 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.7303 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.23 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:13:57.30 +12:30:21.7: ref_mag=14.23 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.3224 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits at 11:24:35.92 +09:51:11.3: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52485.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52539.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53028.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53138.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 6s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52103_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0052
The candidate 52103_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0052 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:37:28.73 +18:08:18.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52369_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0052
The candidate 52369_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0052 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52442_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0052
The candidate 52442_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0052 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:15:56.25 +12:49:02.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52485_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0052
Preparing report for the candidate 52485_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0052
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52539_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0052
Preparing report for the candidate 52539_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0052
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52605_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0052
The candidate 52605_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0052 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:43:39.44 +10:42:04.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52678_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0052
The candidate 52678_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0052 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:44:59.38 +17:08:47.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52691_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0052
The candidate 52691_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0052 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:50:19.78 +10:24:35.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52702_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0052
The candidate 52702_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0052 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:53:10.93 +18:23:01.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52745_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0052
The candidate 52745_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0052 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:31:23.67 +16:05:33.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52767_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0052
The candidate 52767_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0052 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:13:18.33 +12:13:46.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52786_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0052
The candidate 52786_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0052 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:31:37.54 +14:21:15.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52796_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0052
The candidate 52796_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0052 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:09:39.38 +13:17:26.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52893_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0052
The candidate 52893_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0052 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52962_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0052
The candidate 52962_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0052 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:57:03.64 +09:27:13.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53028_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0052
Preparing report for the candidate 53028_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0052
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53036_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0052
The candidate 53036_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0052 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53084_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0052
The candidate 53084_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0052 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:50:59.68 +15:29:20.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53138_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0052
Preparing report for the candidate 53138_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0052
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26067_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0052
The candidate 26067_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0052 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:23:40.09 +16:51:05.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 13255_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0052
The candidate 13255_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_01-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0052 did not pass the final checks