This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_062807_TTUQ2b1x1_2720534_T6Q7VMHX
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 09.4559 2461169.9559 10.27 20:25:26.74 -08:05:14.5
36.38738 -24.55263 galactic Aql Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 9.1 pix
The object was found in VSX 0" EP Aql
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
10.100 V < 15.000 V 2455023.00000 199.700000000000 M5e
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits at 20:25:26.74 -08:05:14.5: 12.31 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits at 20:25:26.74 -08:05:14.5: 12.26 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.29 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
EP Aql,2461169.9559,10.27,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
EP Aql 20260509.4559 10.27CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 09.4559 2461169.9559 12.59 20:46:02.19 -10:29:50.5
36.43459 -30.17489 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.1" and 9.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.287 Nephthys -0 -1 1 12.7 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits at 20:46:02.19 -10:29:50.5: 15.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits at 20:46:02.19 -10:29:50.5: 15.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461169.9559,12.59,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260509.4559 12.59CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 09.4559 2461169.9559 13.52 20:18:32.47 -14:12:17.7
29.47337 -25.59221 galactic Cap Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 9.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.125 Liberatrix -0 -0 0 13.6 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits at 20:18:32.47 -14:12:17.7: 14.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits at 20:18:32.47 -14:12:17.7: 14.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 09.4558* 20 18 32.47 -14 12 17.7 13.5 U Cap 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461169.9559,13.52,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260509.4559 13.52CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 09.4559 2461169.9559 13.36 20:18:15.14 -08:17:32.9
35.32996 -23.04450 galactic Aql Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.3" and 9.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.345 Tercidina -2 -1 2 13.6 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits at 20:18:15.14 -08:17:32.9: 15.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits at 20:18:15.14 -08:17:32.9: 15.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461169.9559,13.36,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260509.4559 13.36CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461125.97108189 26.03.2026 11:18:11.475 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits
First image: 2461125.97108189 26.03.2026 11:18:11.475 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits
Last image: 2461169.95623647 09.05.2026 10:56:48.831 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_062807_TTUQ2b1x1_2720534_T6Q7VMHX/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-56-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0456.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 6
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.24
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 6450
Objects passed selection criteria: 6445
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 5523.25
Average stars matched: 5410 (97.9496 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 112800 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed May 6 12:14:36 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-43-g0c21e0c3
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat May 9 06:30:19 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461125.97108189 26.03.2026 11:18:11.475 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits
First image: 2461125.97108189 26.03.2026 11:18:11.475 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits
Last image: 2461169.95623647 09.05.2026 10:56:48.831 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_062807_TTUQ2b1x1_2720534_T6Q7VMHX/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-56-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0456.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 94
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.88
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 16 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 51299
Objects passed selection criteria: 51212
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 47384
Average stars matched: 45910.5 (96.8903 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 153888 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed May 6 12:14:36 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-43-g0c21e0c3
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat May 9 06:32:08 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_062807_TTUQ2b1x1_2720534_T6Q7VMHX/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-55-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_062807_TTUQ2b1x1_2720534_T6Q7VMHX/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-56-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0456.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_062807_TTUQ2b1x1_2720534_T6Q7VMHX/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-55-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_062807_TTUQ2b1x1_2720534_T6Q7VMHX/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-56-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0456.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461169.95546518
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits'
wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits'
wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-55-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-55-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-55-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-55-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits'
wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-56-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0456.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-56-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0456.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-56-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0456.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-56-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0456.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits
Image size: 938.8'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:18.108 -10:00:22.01 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.88"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-55-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-55-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:33:53.613 -09:58:35.44 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:34:18.108 -10:00:22.01
Second-epoch image center 20:33:53.613 -09:58:35.44
Angular distance between the image centers 0.1048 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-56-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0456.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-56-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0456.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:33:50.438 -09:59:02.09 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:34:18.108 -10:00:22.01
Second-epoch image center 20:33:50.438 -09:59:02.09
Angular distance between the image centers 0.1157 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 20:33:53.613 -09:58:35.44
Second-epoch second image center 20:33:50.438 -09:59:02.09
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01499 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits &> /tmp/tmp.B92BNprd0m
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits &> /tmp/tmp.H4l7sblK6j
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_062807_TTUQ2b1x1_2720534_T6Q7VMHX/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-55-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits &> /tmp/tmp.JPLrTxso7D
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_062807_TTUQ2b1x1_2720534_T6Q7VMHX/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-55-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_062807_TTUQ2b1x1_2720534_T6Q7VMHX/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-56-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0456.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ThXa6O3XXy
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_062807_TTUQ2b1x1_2720534_T6Q7VMHX/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-56-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0456.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits and wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits and wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits and wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 8342 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.4945 to 316.6343 deg, Dec -15.2768 to -4.6764 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.4945 to 316.6343 deg, Dec -15.2768 to -4.6764 deg
Loaded 9314 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6261 out of 6434 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6434 out of 8342 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.609800
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.609800
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.24
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.37
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.37
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 8342 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.4945 to 316.6343 deg, Dec -15.2768 to -4.6764 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.4945 to 316.6343 deg, Dec -15.2768 to -4.6764 deg
Loaded 9314 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6261 out of 6434 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6434 out of 8342 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits (aperture=6.4)
Read 8370 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.4944 to 316.6348 deg, Dec -15.2711 to -4.6671 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.4944 to 316.6348 deg, Dec -15.2711 to -4.6671 deg
Loaded 9315 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6287 out of 6449 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6449 out of 8370 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits (aperture=6.4)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 3 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.5 pix Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits
2.5 pix Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits
2.3 pix fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-55-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits
2.3 pix fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-56-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0456.fits
2.5 pix wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits
2.5 pix wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.4 mag. Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits
14.4 mag. Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-55-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits
13.9 mag. fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-56-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0456.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.9 (SNR ) 11.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.B92BNprd0m (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-09_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_062807_TTUQ2b1x1_2720534_T6Q7VMHX/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=465, passed=8342
Got 8342 stars (including 7863 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8342 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013039 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010431 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 924 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8156 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8152 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8152 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Excluding outliers - 943 stars left (next iteration limit 1037)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits -region wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.H4l7sblK6j (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-09_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_062807_TTUQ2b1x1_2720534_T6Q7VMHX/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=464, passed=8370
Got 8370 stars (including 7896 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8370 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013039 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010431 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 927 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8197 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8197 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8197 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Excluding outliers - 946 stars left (next iteration limit 1040)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits -region wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.JPLrTxso7D (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-09_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_062807_TTUQ2b1x1_2720534_T6Q7VMHX/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_062807_TTUQ2b1x1_2720534_T6Q7VMHX/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-55-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_062807_TTUQ2b1x1_2720534_T6Q7VMHX/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-55-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_062807_TTUQ2b1x1_2720534_T6Q7VMHX/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-55-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_062807_TTUQ2b1x1_2720534_T6Q7VMHX/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-55-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_062807_TTUQ2b1x1_2720534_T6Q7VMHX/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-55-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_062807_TTUQ2b1x1_2720534_T6Q7VMHX/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-55-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-55-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-55-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-55-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-55-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-55-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-55-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-55-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_062807_TTUQ2b1x1_2720534_T6Q7VMHX/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-55-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-55-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=481, passed=5489
Got 5489 stars (including 5003 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-55-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5489 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.2 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 949 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 932 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5360 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.2 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 949 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5361 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5361 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Excluding outliers - 948 stars left (next iteration limit 1042)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-55-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-55-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_062807_TTUQ2b1x1_2720534_T6Q7VMHX/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-55-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-55-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-55-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ThXa6O3XXy (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-09_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_062807_TTUQ2b1x1_2720534_T6Q7VMHX/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_062807_TTUQ2b1x1_2720534_T6Q7VMHX/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-56-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0456.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_062807_TTUQ2b1x1_2720534_T6Q7VMHX/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-56-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0456.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_062807_TTUQ2b1x1_2720534_T6Q7VMHX/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-56-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0456.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_062807_TTUQ2b1x1_2720534_T6Q7VMHX/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-56-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0456.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_062807_TTUQ2b1x1_2720534_T6Q7VMHX/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-56-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0456.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_062807_TTUQ2b1x1_2720534_T6Q7VMHX/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-56-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0456.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-56-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0456.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-56-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0456.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-56-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0456.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-56-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0456.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-56-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0456.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-56-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0456.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-56-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0456.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_062807_TTUQ2b1x1_2720534_T6Q7VMHX/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-56-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0456.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-56-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0456.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=468, passed=5321
Got 5321 stars (including 4847 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-56-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0456.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5321 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.2 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 952 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 939 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5215 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.2 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 952 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5214 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5214 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Excluding outliers - 952 stars left (next iteration limit 1047)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-56-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0456.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-56-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0456.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_062807_TTUQ2b1x1_2720534_T6Q7VMHX/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-56-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0456.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-56-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0456.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-56-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0456.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-55-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-55-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_062807_TTUQ2b1x1_2720534_T6Q7VMHX/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-55-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-56-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0456.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-56-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0456.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_062807_TTUQ2b1x1_2720534_T6Q7VMHX/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-56-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0456.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cap-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits at 20:25:26.74 -08:05:14.5: 12.31 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits at 20:40:41.10 -10:13:19.0: 10.85 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits at 20:40:41.10 -10:13:19.0: 10.84 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits at 20:25:26.74 -08:05:14.5: 12.26 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.84 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.29 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:40:41.10 -10:13:19.0: ref_mag=10.84 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.2596 delta=-0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:25:26.74 -08:05:14.5: ref_mag=12.29 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=10.2635 delta=2.02 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20408.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 5s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20394_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-56-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0456
The candidate 20394_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-56-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0456 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:15:11.10 -06:09:04.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20408_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-56-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0456
Preparing report for the candidate 20408_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-56-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0456
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20436_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-56-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0456
The candidate 20436_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-56-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0456 did not pass the final checks
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 6s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cap-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
20:25:26.74 -08:05:14.5
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_062807_TTUQ2b1x1_2720534_T6Q7VMHX/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-55-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_062807_TTUQ2b1x1_2720534_T6Q7VMHX/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-56-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0456.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_062807_TTUQ2b1x1_2720534_T6Q7VMHX/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-55-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_062807_TTUQ2b1x1_2720534_T6Q7VMHX/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-56-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0456.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-55-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-56-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0456.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-55-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-56-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0456.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits
Image size: 938.8'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:18.108 -10:00:22.01 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.88"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-55-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-55-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:33:53.613 -09:58:35.44 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:34:18.108 -10:00:22.01
Second-epoch image center 20:33:53.613 -09:58:35.44
Angular distance between the image centers 0.1048 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-56-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0456.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-56-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0456.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:33:50.438 -09:59:02.09 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:34:18.108 -10:00:22.01
Second-epoch image center 20:33:50.438 -09:59:02.09
Angular distance between the image centers 0.1157 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 20:33:53.613 -09:58:35.44
Second-epoch second image center 20:33:50.438 -09:59:02.09
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01499 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits &> /tmp/tmp.vYzvc2rmSJ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Z43L4B69OK
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_062807_TTUQ2b1x1_2720534_T6Q7VMHX/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-55-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits &> /tmp/tmp.hdPU1TINpM
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_062807_TTUQ2b1x1_2720534_T6Q7VMHX/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-55-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_062807_TTUQ2b1x1_2720534_T6Q7VMHX/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-56-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0456.fits &> /tmp/tmp.9Uwk5Z3LWR
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_062807_TTUQ2b1x1_2720534_T6Q7VMHX/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-56-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0456.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits and wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits and wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits and wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 62226 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.4584 to 316.6523 deg, Dec -15.2810 to -4.6636 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.4584 to 316.6523 deg, Dec -15.2810 to -4.6636 deg
Loaded 9351 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7527 out of 8327 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8327 out of 62226 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.426200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.426200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.88
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.55
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.55
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 62226 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.4584 to 316.6523 deg, Dec -15.2810 to -4.6636 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.4584 to 316.6523 deg, Dec -15.2810 to -4.6636 deg
Loaded 9351 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7527 out of 8327 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8327 out of 62226 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits (aperture=4.8)
Read 62427 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.4574 to 316.6348 deg, Dec -15.2743 to -4.6552 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.4574 to 316.6348 deg, Dec -15.2743 to -4.6552 deg
Loaded 9341 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7544 out of 8328 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8328 out of 62427 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits (aperture=4.8)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 43 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits
2.3 pix Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits
2.1 pix fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-55-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits
2.1 pix fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-56-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0456.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.5 mag. Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits
14.5 mag. Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-55-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-56-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0456.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.1 (SNR ) 13.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.vYzvc2rmSJ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-09_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_062807_TTUQ2b1x1_2720534_T6Q7VMHX/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=3361, passed=62217
Got 62217 stars (including 58784 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 62217 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013039 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010431 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 923 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 60890 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 60888 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 60888 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Excluding outliers - 945 stars left (next iteration limit 1039)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits -region wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Z43L4B69OK (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-09_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_062807_TTUQ2b1x1_2720534_T6Q7VMHX/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=3361, passed=62419
Got 62419 stars (including 58983 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 62419 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013039 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010431 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 929 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 60982 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 60979 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 60979 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Excluding outliers - 945 stars left (next iteration limit 1040)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits -region wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.hdPU1TINpM (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-09_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_062807_TTUQ2b1x1_2720534_T6Q7VMHX/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_062807_TTUQ2b1x1_2720534_T6Q7VMHX/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-55-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_062807_TTUQ2b1x1_2720534_T6Q7VMHX/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-55-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_062807_TTUQ2b1x1_2720534_T6Q7VMHX/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-55-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_062807_TTUQ2b1x1_2720534_T6Q7VMHX/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-55-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_062807_TTUQ2b1x1_2720534_T6Q7VMHX/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-55-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_062807_TTUQ2b1x1_2720534_T6Q7VMHX/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-55-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-55-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-55-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-55-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-55-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-55-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-55-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-55-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_062807_TTUQ2b1x1_2720534_T6Q7VMHX/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-55-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-55-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=1, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=2021, passed=47094
Got 47094 stars (including 45015 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-55-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 47094 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.2 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 949 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 929 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 45882 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.2 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 949 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 45887 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 45887 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Excluding outliers - 948 stars left (next iteration limit 1041)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-55-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-55-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_062807_TTUQ2b1x1_2720534_T6Q7VMHX/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-55-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-55-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-55-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.9Uwk5Z3LWR (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-09_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_062807_TTUQ2b1x1_2720534_T6Q7VMHX/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_062807_TTUQ2b1x1_2720534_T6Q7VMHX/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-56-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0456.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_062807_TTUQ2b1x1_2720534_T6Q7VMHX/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-56-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0456.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_062807_TTUQ2b1x1_2720534_T6Q7VMHX/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-56-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0456.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_062807_TTUQ2b1x1_2720534_T6Q7VMHX/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-56-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0456.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_062807_TTUQ2b1x1_2720534_T6Q7VMHX/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-56-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0456.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_062807_TTUQ2b1x1_2720534_T6Q7VMHX/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-56-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0456.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-56-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0456.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-56-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0456.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-56-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0456.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-56-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0456.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-56-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0456.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-56-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0456.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-56-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0456.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_062807_TTUQ2b1x1_2720534_T6Q7VMHX/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-56-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0456.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-56-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0456.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=3, blended=1840, passed=45397
Got 45397 stars (including 43483 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-56-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0456.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 45397 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 950 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 933 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 44442 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 950 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 44438 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 44438 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Excluding outliers - 949 stars left (next iteration limit 1043)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-56-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0456.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-56-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0456.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_062807_TTUQ2b1x1_2720534_T6Q7VMHX/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-56-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0456.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-56-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0456.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-56-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0456.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-55-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_062807_TTUQ2b1x1_2720534_T6Q7VMHX/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-55-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-56-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0456.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_062807_TTUQ2b1x1_2720534_T6Q7VMHX/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-56-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0456.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cap-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits at 20:30:14.96 -06:11:35.0: 11.82 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits at 20:49:29.11 -11:40:31.6: 12.86 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits at 20:20:50.80 -06:29:37.6: 13.12 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits at 20:16:40.89 -06:15:23.7: 13.83 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits at 20:29:21.85 -06:55:08.1: 12.86 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits at 20:27:15.65 -06:46:46.8: 12.57 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits at 20:20:45.90 -07:45:59.2: 11.67 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits at 20:26:20.95 -06:08:26.9: 11.37 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits at 20:30:14.96 -06:11:35.0: 11.79 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits at 20:20:50.80 -06:29:37.6: 13.03 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits at 20:49:29.11 -11:40:31.6: 12.96 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.81 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.07 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:30:14.96 -06:11:35.0: ref_mag=11.81 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1404 delta=-0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits at 20:16:40.89 -06:15:23.7: 13.93 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits at 20:27:15.65 -06:46:46.8: 12.57 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:20:50.80 -06:29:37.6: ref_mag=13.07 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.2404 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits at 20:29:21.85 -06:55:08.1: 12.74 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.90 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:49:29.11 -11:40:31.6: ref_mag=12.90 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.2120 delta=-0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.88 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.57 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits at 20:20:45.90 -07:45:59.2: 11.70 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.79 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:16:40.89 -06:15:23.7: ref_mag=13.88 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.8754 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:27:15.65 -06:46:46.8: ref_mag=12.57 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9975 delta=-0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:29:21.85 -06:55:08.1: ref_mag=12.79 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0574 delta=-0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.69 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:20:45.90 -07:45:59.2: ref_mag=11.69 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8309 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits at 20:46:02.19 -10:29:50.5: 15.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits at 20:23:04.09 -13:05:15.7: 12.74 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits at 20:26:20.95 -06:08:26.9: 11.42 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.39 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:26:20.95 -06:08:26.9: ref_mag=11.39 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.4561 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits at 20:46:02.19 -10:29:50.5: 15.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits at 20:23:04.09 -13:05:15.7: 12.62 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.67 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:23:04.09 -13:05:15.7: ref_mag=12.67 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.6898 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits at 20:27:54.33 -10:07:10.2: 12.47 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits at 20:10:56.95 -07:56:00.8: 12.30 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits at 20:22:03.03 -07:47:10.0: 12.62 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits at 20:20:05.75 -06:51:10.5: 12.84 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits at 20:19:42.07 -13:27:10.5: 12.84 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits at 20:10:04.95 -08:08:01.1: 12.83 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits at 20:16:57.27 -10:10:53.5: 12.64 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits at 20:27:54.33 -10:07:10.2: 12.45 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits at 20:20:05.75 -06:51:10.5: 12.74 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.46 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits at 20:22:03.03 -07:47:10.0: 12.58 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits at 20:10:56.95 -07:56:00.8: 12.26 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:27:54.33 -10:07:10.2: ref_mag=12.46 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7197 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.78 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:20:05.75 -06:51:10.5: ref_mag=12.78 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.8349 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.60 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.28 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:22:03.03 -07:47:10.0: ref_mag=12.60 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8641 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:10:56.95 -07:56:00.8: ref_mag=12.28 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6205 delta=-0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits at 20:19:42.07 -13:27:10.5: 12.85 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits at 20:10:04.95 -08:08:01.1: 12.82 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.84 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits at 20:16:57.27 -10:10:53.5: 12.59 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits at 20:17:58.94 -10:36:18.4: 12.90 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:19:42.07 -13:27:10.5: ref_mag=12.84 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.9954 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.83 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:10:04.95 -08:08:01.1: ref_mag=12.83 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.8945 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.62 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:16:57.27 -10:10:53.5: ref_mag=12.62 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.9851 delta=-0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits at 20:17:58.94 -10:36:18.4: 12.96 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits at 20:07:11.09 -07:01:24.1: 13.18 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits at 20:18:32.47 -14:12:17.7: 14.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.93 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits at 20:18:15.14 -08:17:32.9: 15.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:17:58.94 -10:36:18.4: ref_mag=12.93 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.0524 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits at 20:33:14.15 -10:08:23.4: 13.12 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits at 20:40:51.91 -14:14:37.0: 14.45 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits at 20:47:16.23 -10:08:46.4: 13.88 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits at 20:34:50.75 -07:13:53.6: 13.23 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits at 20:07:11.09 -07:01:24.1: 13.30 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits at 20:18:32.47 -14:12:17.7: 14.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.23 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:07:11.09 -07:01:24.1: ref_mag=13.23 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.2554 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits at 20:33:14.15 -10:08:23.4: 13.07 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits at 20:18:15.14 -08:17:32.9: 15.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.09 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:33:14.15 -10:08:23.4: ref_mag=13.09 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.1941 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits at 20:29:50.55 -10:16:41.7: 14.32 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits at 20:40:51.91 -14:14:37.0: 14.44 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.44 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:40:51.91 -14:14:37.0: ref_mag=14.44 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=13.4983 delta=0.94 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits at 20:47:16.23 -10:08:46.4: 13.88 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits at 20:34:50.75 -07:13:53.6: 13.39 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.88 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:47:16.23 -10:08:46.4: ref_mag=13.88 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.9085 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.30 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:34:50.75 -07:13:53.6: ref_mag=13.30 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.4603 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits at 20:29:50.55 -10:16:41.7: 14.28 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits at 20:46:03.03 -09:31:18.6: 14.04 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.30 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:29:50.55 -10:16:41.7: ref_mag=14.30 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.9656 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits at 20:31:39.93 -08:41:32.1: 14.61 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits at 20:46:03.03 -09:31:18.6: 13.99 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.01 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:46:03.03 -09:31:18.6: ref_mag=14.01 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.0212 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits at 20:31:39.93 -08:41:32.1: 14.35 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.45 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:31:39.93 -08:41:32.1: ref_mag=14.45 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.1093 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out77538.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out77307.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out77504.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out77513.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 8s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77054_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-56-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0456
The candidate 77054_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-56-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0456 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77069_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-56-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0456
The candidate 77069_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-56-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0456 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:19:48.97 -06:12:53.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77076_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-56-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0456
The candidate 77076_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-56-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0456 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:30:51.29 -12:37:39.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77079_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-56-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0456
The candidate 77079_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-56-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0456 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77080_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-56-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0456
The candidate 77080_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-56-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0456 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77081_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-56-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0456
The candidate 77081_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-56-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0456 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77084_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-56-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0456
The candidate 77084_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-56-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0456 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77095_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-56-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0456
The candidate 77095_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-56-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0456 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:21:13.93 -10:43:32.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77098_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-56-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0456
The candidate 77098_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-56-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0456 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77100_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-56-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0456
The candidate 77100_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-56-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0456 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77157_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-56-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0456
The candidate 77157_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-56-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0456 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77235_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-56-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0456
The candidate 77235_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-56-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0456 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:49:07.28 -13:52:32.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77242_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-56-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0456
The candidate 77242_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-56-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0456 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:18:03.62 -12:35:38.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77307_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-56-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0456
Preparing report for the candidate 77307_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-56-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0456
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77324_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-56-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0456
The candidate 77324_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-56-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0456 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77328_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-56-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0456
The candidate 77328_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-56-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0456 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:18:09.58 -12:35:22.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77333_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-56-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0456
The candidate 77333_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-56-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0456 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77342_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-56-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0456
The candidate 77342_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-56-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0456 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:18:33.00 -06:43:24.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77344_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-56-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0456
The candidate 77344_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-56-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0456 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:18:06.06 -12:35:35.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77351_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-56-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0456
The candidate 77351_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-56-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0456 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77364_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-56-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0456
The candidate 77364_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-56-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0456 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77367_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-56-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0456
The candidate 77367_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-56-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0456 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77399_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-56-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0456
The candidate 77399_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-56-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0456 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77400_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-56-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0456
The candidate 77400_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-56-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0456 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77408_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-56-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0456
The candidate 77408_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-56-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0456 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77428_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-56-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0456
The candidate 77428_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-56-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0456 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:11:47.95 -06:33:57.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77440_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-56-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0456
The candidate 77440_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-56-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0456 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77442_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-56-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0456
The candidate 77442_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-56-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0456 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:18:00.56 -06:08:43.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77469_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-56-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0456
The candidate 77469_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-56-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0456 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:13:27.46 -08:27:01.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77477_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-56-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0456
The candidate 77477_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-56-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0456 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77504_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-56-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0456
Preparing report for the candidate 77504_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-56-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0456
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77513_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-56-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0456
Preparing report for the candidate 77513_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-56-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0456
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77525_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-56-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0456
The candidate 77525_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-56-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0456 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77538_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-56-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0456
The candidate 77538_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-56-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0456 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:40:51.91 -14:14:37.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.50, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.48)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.208 6887526864309438976 310.21603057999 -14.24339056263 13.9456 13.5436 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.208#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77558_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-56-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0456
The candidate 77558_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-56-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0456 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:25:45.21 -12:37:24.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77559_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-56-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0456
The candidate 77559_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-56-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0456 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77643_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-56-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0456
The candidate 77643_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-56-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0456 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77645_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-56-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0456
The candidate 77645_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-56-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0456 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77670_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-56-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0456
The candidate 77670_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-56-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0456 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:12:01.46 -10:20:59.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77673_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-56-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0456
The candidate 77673_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-56-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0456 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77693_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-56-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0456
The candidate 77693_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-56-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0456 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51281_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-56-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0456
The candidate 51281_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-56-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0456 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:15:11.11 -06:09:04.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 60495_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-56-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0456
The candidate 60495_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_05-56-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0456 did not pass the final checks