This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_033952_TTUQ2b1x1_462026_FvCjkPjB
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 09.3059 2461169.8059 11.35 15:47:58.64 -09:08:41.7
358.88467 33.92849 galactic Lib Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 5.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.92 Undina 1 -1 1 11.4 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits at 15:47:58.64 -09:08:41.7: 15.36 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-03-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 15:47:58.64 -09:08:41.7: 15.36 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461169.8059,11.35,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260509.3059 11.35CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 09.3059 2461169.8059 12.26 15:36:50.96 -09:13:38.5
356.54521 35.89565 galactic Lib Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 5.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.269 Justitia 2 -1 2 12.1 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits at 15:36:50.96 -09:13:38.5: 15.65 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-03-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 15:36:50.96 -09:13:38.5: 15.64 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461169.8059,12.26,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260509.3059 12.26CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 09.3059 2461169.8059 12.47 15:52:40.32 -08:48:58.6
0.09900 33.27352 galactic Lib Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 5.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.776 Berbericia 1 -0 1 12.6 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits at 15:52:40.32 -08:48:58.6: 15.45 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-03-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 15:52:40.32 -08:48:58.6: 15.47 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461169.8059,12.47,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260509.3059 12.47CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 09.3059 2461169.8059 14.41 15:07:44.83 -10:52:48.0
348.52938 39.63113 galactic Lib Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 5.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.562 Salome 1 0 1 14.2 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits at 15:07:44.83 -10:52:48.0: 15.65 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-03-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 15:07:44.83 -10:52:48.0: 15.70 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461169.8059,14.41,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260509.3059 14.41CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461148.91880361 18.04.2026 10:02:54.632 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits
First image: 2461148.91880361 18.04.2026 10:02:54.632 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits
Last image: 2461169.80612394 09.05.2026 07:20:39.108 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_033952_TTUQ2b1x1_462026_FvCjkPjB/fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 7
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.79
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 6 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 6413
Objects passed selection criteria: 6411
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.8 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.8 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 6168.25
Average stars matched: 5939.5 (96.2915 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 112564 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed May 6 12:14:36 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-43-g0c21e0c3
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat May 9 03:42:20 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461148.91880361 18.04.2026 10:02:54.632 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits
First image: 2461148.91880361 18.04.2026 10:02:54.632 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits
Last image: 2461169.80612394 09.05.2026 07:20:39.108 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_033952_TTUQ2b1x1_462026_FvCjkPjB/fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 140
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.50
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 21 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 41691
Objects passed selection criteria: 41624
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 40367
Average stars matched: 38506.5 (95.391 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 143256 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed May 6 12:14:36 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-43-g0c21e0c3
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat May 9 03:44:22 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-03-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0232.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_033952_TTUQ2b1x1_462026_FvCjkPjB/fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-19-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_033952_TTUQ2b1x1_462026_FvCjkPjB/fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-03-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-03-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0232.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_033952_TTUQ2b1x1_462026_FvCjkPjB/fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-19-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_033952_TTUQ2b1x1_462026_FvCjkPjB/fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461169.80557929
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits'
wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-03-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0232.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-03-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0232.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-03-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0232.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-03-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0232.fits'
wcs_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-19-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-19-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-19-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-19-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits'
wcs_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:25:39.738 -10:02:41.34 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-19-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-19-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:25:42.938 -10:00:10.20 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:25:39.738 -10:02:41.34
Second-epoch image center 15:25:42.938 -10:00:10.20
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0440 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:25:40.900 -10:00:04.15 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:25:39.738 -10:02:41.34
Second-epoch image center 15:25:40.900 -10:00:04.15
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0439 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 15:25:42.938 -10:00:10.20
Second-epoch second image center 15:25:40.900 -10:00:04.15
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00853 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits &> /tmp/tmp.lbgsrU0XSZ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-03-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0232.fits &> /tmp/tmp.fzwpt55ABZ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-03-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0232.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_033952_TTUQ2b1x1_462026_FvCjkPjB/fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-19-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits &> /tmp/tmp.wSxhPTGNwY
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_033952_TTUQ2b1x1_462026_FvCjkPjB/fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-19-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_033952_TTUQ2b1x1_462026_FvCjkPjB/fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Ichuhm3x3q
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_033952_TTUQ2b1x1_462026_FvCjkPjB/fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits and wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits and wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits and wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits) and catalog (wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 7551 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 223.4099 to 239.5770 deg, Dec -15.3329 to -4.6765 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 223.4099 to 239.5770 deg, Dec -15.3329 to -4.6765 deg
Loaded 5432 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4484 out of 4626 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4626 out of 7551 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.683300
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.683300
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.79
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.89
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.89
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 7551 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 223.4099 to 239.5770 deg, Dec -15.3329 to -4.6765 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 223.4099 to 239.5770 deg, Dec -15.3329 to -4.6765 deg
Loaded 5432 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4484 out of 4626 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4626 out of 7551 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits (aperture=6.3)
Read 7465 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 223.4305 to 239.5768 deg, Dec -15.3269 to -4.6766 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 223.4305 to 239.5768 deg, Dec -15.3269 to -4.6766 deg
Loaded 5426 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4446 out of 4595 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4595 out of 7465 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-03-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0232.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-03-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0232.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-03-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0232.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-03-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0232.fits (aperture=6.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 7 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.4 pix Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits
2.3 pix Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-03-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0232.fits
2.4 pix fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-19-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
2.4 pix fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249.fits
2.4 pix wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-03-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0232.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.9 mag. Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits
14.9 mag. Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-03-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0232.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-19-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.0 (SNR ) 12.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.lbgsrU0XSZ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-09_CI_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_033952_TTUQ2b1x1_462026_FvCjkPjB/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits' -> 'wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=467, passed=7551
Got 7551 stars (including 7072 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7551 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 967 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7496 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7497 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7497 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Excluding outliers - 971 stars left (next iteration limit 1068)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits -region wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.fzwpt55ABZ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-09_CI_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_033952_TTUQ2b1x1_462026_FvCjkPjB/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-03-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0232.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-03-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0232.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-03-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0232.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-03-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0232.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-03-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0232.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-03-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0232.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-03-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0232.fits' -> 'wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-03-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0232.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-03-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0232.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-03-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0232.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-03-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0232.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-03-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-03-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0232.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-03-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-03-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0232.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-03-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0232.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-03-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0232.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-03-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=482, passed=7465
Got 7465 stars (including 6976 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-03-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7465 stars from the SExtractor catalog
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-09_CI_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_033952_TTUQ2b1x1_462026_FvCjkPjB/util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 968 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7403 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7403 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7403 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Excluding outliers - 972 stars left (next iteration limit 1069)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-03-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-03-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-03-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0232.fits -region wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-03-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-03-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.wSxhPTGNwY (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-09_CI_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_033952_TTUQ2b1x1_462026_FvCjkPjB/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_033952_TTUQ2b1x1_462026_FvCjkPjB/fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-19-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_033952_TTUQ2b1x1_462026_FvCjkPjB/fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-19-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_033952_TTUQ2b1x1_462026_FvCjkPjB/fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-19-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_033952_TTUQ2b1x1_462026_FvCjkPjB/fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-19-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_033952_TTUQ2b1x1_462026_FvCjkPjB/fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-19-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_033952_TTUQ2b1x1_462026_FvCjkPjB/fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-19-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-19-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-19-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-19-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-19-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-19-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-19-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-19-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_033952_TTUQ2b1x1_462026_FvCjkPjB/fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-19-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-19-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=492, passed=8120
Got 8120 stars (including 7621 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-19-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8120 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.2 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 965 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8036 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.2 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8037 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8037 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Excluding outliers - 969 stars left (next iteration limit 1065)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-19-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-19-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_033952_TTUQ2b1x1_462026_FvCjkPjB/fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-19-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits -region wcs_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-19-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-19-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Ichuhm3x3q (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-09_CI_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_033952_TTUQ2b1x1_462026_FvCjkPjB/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_033952_TTUQ2b1x1_462026_FvCjkPjB/fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_033952_TTUQ2b1x1_462026_FvCjkPjB/fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_033952_TTUQ2b1x1_462026_FvCjkPjB/fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_033952_TTUQ2b1x1_462026_FvCjkPjB/fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_033952_TTUQ2b1x1_462026_FvCjkPjB/fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_033952_TTUQ2b1x1_462026_FvCjkPjB/fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_033952_TTUQ2b1x1_462026_FvCjkPjB/fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=520, passed=8076
Got 8076 stars (including 7552 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8076 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.2 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 961 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7972 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.2 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7971 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7971 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 967 stars left (next iteration limit 1063)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_033952_TTUQ2b1x1_462026_FvCjkPjB/fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249.fits -region wcs_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-19-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-19-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_033952_TTUQ2b1x1_462026_FvCjkPjB/wcs_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-19-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_033952_TTUQ2b1x1_462026_FvCjkPjB/wcs_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Lib-02-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits at 15:47:58.64 -09:08:41.7: 15.36 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits at 15:39:33.44 -09:34:26.8: 11.88 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits at 15:39:37.08 -08:12:36.2: 12.01 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits at 15:18:21.83 -08:27:42.4: 12.42 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits at 15:26:56.02 -08:08:22.1: 12.04 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-03-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 15:39:37.08 -08:12:36.2: 12.04 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-03-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 15:26:56.02 -08:08:22.1: 12.07 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-03-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 15:18:21.83 -08:27:42.4: 12.41 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.02 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.06 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-03-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 15:47:58.64 -09:08:41.7: 15.36 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.42 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:39:37.08 -08:12:36.2: ref_mag=12.02 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0343 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:26:56.02 -08:08:22.1: ref_mag=12.06 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0015 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-03-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 15:39:33.44 -09:34:26.8: 11.86 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:18:21.83 -08:27:42.4: ref_mag=12.42 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0577 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.87 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:39:33.44 -09:34:26.8: ref_mag=11.87 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8896 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20291.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 6s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20285_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 20285_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:21:45.64 -08:14:39.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20291_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249
Preparing report for the candidate 20291_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20303_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 20303_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20304_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 20304_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20305_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 20305_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20311_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 20311_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03227_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 03227_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:43:38.07 -09:23:08.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 7s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Lib-02-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
15:47:58.64 -09:08:41.7
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-03-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0232.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_033952_TTUQ2b1x1_462026_FvCjkPjB/fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-19-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_033952_TTUQ2b1x1_462026_FvCjkPjB/fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-03-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-03-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0232.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_033952_TTUQ2b1x1_462026_FvCjkPjB/fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-19-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_033952_TTUQ2b1x1_462026_FvCjkPjB/fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-03-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0232.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-19-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-03-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0232.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-19-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:25:39.738 -10:02:41.34 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-19-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-19-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Image size: 937.1'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:25:42.938 -10:00:10.20 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:25:39.738 -10:02:41.34
Second-epoch image center 15:25:42.938 -10:00:10.20
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0440 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:25:40.900 -10:00:04.15 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:25:39.738 -10:02:41.34
Second-epoch image center 15:25:40.900 -10:00:04.15
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0439 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 15:25:42.938 -10:00:10.20
Second-epoch second image center 15:25:40.900 -10:00:04.15
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00853 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits &> /tmp/tmp.trFGgunM71
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-03-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0232.fits &> /tmp/tmp.YTzJYWZYsv
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-03-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0232.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_033952_TTUQ2b1x1_462026_FvCjkPjB/fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-19-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits &> /tmp/tmp.NTY6F6zABZ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_033952_TTUQ2b1x1_462026_FvCjkPjB/fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-19-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_033952_TTUQ2b1x1_462026_FvCjkPjB/fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249.fits &> /tmp/tmp.iobLSMEn3k
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_033952_TTUQ2b1x1_462026_FvCjkPjB/fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits and wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits and wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits and wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits) and catalog (wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 47001 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 223.4099 to 239.5887 deg, Dec -15.3330 to -4.6429 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 223.4099 to 239.5887 deg, Dec -15.3330 to -4.6429 deg
Loaded 5451 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4379 out of 4779 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4779 out of 47001 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.531800
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.531800
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.50
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.03
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.03
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 47001 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 223.4099 to 239.5887 deg, Dec -15.3330 to -4.6429 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 223.4099 to 239.5887 deg, Dec -15.3330 to -4.6429 deg
Loaded 5451 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4379 out of 4779 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4779 out of 47001 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits (aperture=4.8)
Read 47607 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 223.4155 to 239.5900 deg, Dec -15.3311 to -4.6429 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 223.4155 to 239.5900 deg, Dec -15.3311 to -4.6429 deg
Loaded 5451 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4372 out of 4776 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4776 out of 47607 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-03-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0232.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-03-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0232.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-03-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0232.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-03-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0232.fits (aperture=4.7)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 67 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits
2.2 pix Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-03-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0232.fits
2.3 pix fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-19-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
2.3 pix fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-03-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0232.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.0 mag. Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits
15.0 mag. Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-03-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0232.fits
15.1 mag. fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-19-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
15.1 mag. fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.1 (SNR ) 14.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.trFGgunM71 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-09_CI_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_033952_TTUQ2b1x1_462026_FvCjkPjB/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits' -> 'wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=12, blended=2531, passed=46989
Got 46989 stars (including 44395 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 46989 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 968 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46474 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46475 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46475 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Excluding outliers - 974 stars left (next iteration limit 1071)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits -region wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.YTzJYWZYsv (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-09_CI_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_033952_TTUQ2b1x1_462026_FvCjkPjB/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-03-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0232.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-03-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0232.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-03-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0232.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-03-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0232.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-03-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0232.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-03-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0232.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-03-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0232.fits' -> 'wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-03-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0232.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-03-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0232.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-03-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0232.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-03-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0232.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-03-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-03-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0232.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-03-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-03-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0232.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-03-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0232.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-03-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0232.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-03-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=2570, passed=47597
Got 47597 stars (including 44963 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-03-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 47597 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 966 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46983 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46983 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46983 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Excluding outliers - 973 stars left (next iteration limit 1070)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-03-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-03-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-03-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0232.fits -region wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-03-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-03-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.NTY6F6zABZ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-09_CI_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_033952_TTUQ2b1x1_462026_FvCjkPjB/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_033952_TTUQ2b1x1_462026_FvCjkPjB/fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-19-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_033952_TTUQ2b1x1_462026_FvCjkPjB/fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-19-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_033952_TTUQ2b1x1_462026_FvCjkPjB/fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-19-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_033952_TTUQ2b1x1_462026_FvCjkPjB/fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-19-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_033952_TTUQ2b1x1_462026_FvCjkPjB/fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-19-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_033952_TTUQ2b1x1_462026_FvCjkPjB/fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-19-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-19-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-19-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-19-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-19-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-19-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-19-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-19-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_033952_TTUQ2b1x1_462026_FvCjkPjB/fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-19-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-19-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=2592, passed=47132
Got 47132 stars (including 44480 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-19-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 47132 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 957 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46492 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46494 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46494 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 968 stars left (next iteration limit 1064)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-19-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-19-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_033952_TTUQ2b1x1_462026_FvCjkPjB/fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-19-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits -region wcs_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-19-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-19-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.iobLSMEn3k (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-09_CI_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_033952_TTUQ2b1x1_462026_FvCjkPjB/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_033952_TTUQ2b1x1_462026_FvCjkPjB/fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_033952_TTUQ2b1x1_462026_FvCjkPjB/fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_033952_TTUQ2b1x1_462026_FvCjkPjB/fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_033952_TTUQ2b1x1_462026_FvCjkPjB/fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_033952_TTUQ2b1x1_462026_FvCjkPjB/fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_033952_TTUQ2b1x1_462026_FvCjkPjB/fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_033952_TTUQ2b1x1_462026_FvCjkPjB/fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=2716, passed=47470
Got 47470 stars (including 44700 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 47470 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 958 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46834 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46835 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46835 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 969 stars left (next iteration limit 1065)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_033952_TTUQ2b1x1_462026_FvCjkPjB/fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249.fits -region wcs_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-19-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_033952_TTUQ2b1x1_462026_FvCjkPjB/wcs_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-19-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_033952_TTUQ2b1x1_462026_FvCjkPjB/wcs_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Lib-02-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits at 15:44:06.65 -09:34:53.3: 14.05 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits at 15:36:50.96 -09:13:38.5: 15.65 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits at 15:50:02.57 -08:00:17.8: 12.15 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits at 15:50:40.75 -05:51:30.9: 14.13 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits at 15:38:58.17 -12:56:39.8: 14.22 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits at 15:52:40.32 -08:48:58.6: 15.45 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits at 15:51:51.15 -11:08:10.2: 13.57 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits at 15:45:57.93 -12:01:12.2: 13.00 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits at 15:45:50.35 -09:21:26.0: 12.98 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-03-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 15:44:06.65 -09:34:53.3: 13.84 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-03-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 15:50:02.57 -08:00:17.8: 12.14 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-03-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 15:50:40.75 -05:51:30.9: 14.17 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-03-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 15:36:50.96 -09:13:38.5: 15.64 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-03-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 15:52:40.32 -08:48:58.6: 15.47 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-03-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 15:38:58.17 -12:56:39.8: 14.52 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.15 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.92 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.15 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:44:06.65 -09:34:53.3: ref_mag=13.92 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.2628 delta=-0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:50:02.57 -08:00:17.8: ref_mag=12.15 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4051 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.33 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:38:58.17 -12:56:39.8: ref_mag=14.33 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.4164 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:50:40.75 -05:51:30.9: ref_mag=14.15 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.2799 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits at 15:45:55.23 -07:30:45.1: 14.41 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-03-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 15:51:51.15 -11:08:10.2: 13.71 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-03-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 15:45:57.93 -12:01:12.2: 12.91 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-03-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 15:45:50.35 -09:21:26.0: 12.99 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.63 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:51:51.15 -11:08:10.2: ref_mag=13.63 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.6788 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.95 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:45:57.93 -12:01:12.2: ref_mag=12.95 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0232 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.99 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:45:50.35 -09:21:26.0: ref_mag=12.99 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0507 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-03-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 15:45:55.23 -07:30:45.1: 14.53 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.46 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:45:55.23 -07:30:45.1: ref_mag=14.46 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.2948 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits at 15:51:04.62 -09:52:30.5: 14.25 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits at 15:46:56.01 -12:53:56.4: 15.15 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits at 15:49:44.21 -10:15:53.3: 14.40 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits at 15:53:02.49 -11:33:07.3: 15.08 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits at 15:52:36.00 -06:38:37.1: 14.48 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits at 15:53:40.70 -13:31:04.0: 14.67 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits at 15:46:44.06 -08:41:27.3: 14.90 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-03-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 15:51:04.62 -09:52:30.5: 14.60 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-03-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 15:46:56.01 -12:53:56.4: 14.69 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.38 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-03-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 15:53:02.49 -11:33:07.3: 14.95 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-03-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 15:49:44.21 -10:15:53.3: 14.75 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:51:04.62 -09:52:30.5: ref_mag=14.38 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.3509 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.82 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:46:56.01 -12:53:56.4: ref_mag=14.82 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.4234 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits at 15:45:33.27 -14:11:31.6: 15.01 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.53 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.01 +/- 0.18
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:49:44.21 -10:15:53.3: ref_mag=14.53 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.3472 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:53:02.49 -11:33:07.3: ref_mag=15.01 +/- 0.18 new_mean_mag=14.4907 delta=0.52 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-03-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 15:52:36.00 -06:38:37.1: 14.85 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-03-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 15:53:40.70 -13:31:04.0: 14.51 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.61 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:52:36.00 -06:38:37.1: ref_mag=14.61 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.4795 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.58 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:53:40.70 -13:31:04.0: ref_mag=14.58 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.3767 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-03-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 15:46:44.06 -08:41:27.3: 14.80 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.85 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:46:44.06 -08:41:27.3: ref_mag=14.85 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.4455 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-03-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 15:45:33.27 -14:11:31.6: 14.69 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.81 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:45:33.27 -14:11:31.6: ref_mag=14.81 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.4316 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits at 15:46:33.18 -11:20:10.1: 14.64 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits at 15:19:11.22 -09:07:15.4: 14.61 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits at 15:51:37.07 -12:10:01.8: 14.76 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits at 15:52:08.53 -13:31:00.1: 14.43 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits at 15:47:16.31 -06:17:29.7: 14.67 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits at 15:51:11.53 -07:21:16.6: 14.85 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits at 15:08:07.45 -10:17:58.8: 14.27 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-03-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 15:46:33.18 -11:20:10.1: 14.44 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-03-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 15:51:37.07 -12:10:01.8: 14.74 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-03-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 15:52:08.53 -13:31:00.1: 14.42 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-03-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 15:19:11.22 -09:07:15.4: 14.33 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.52 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.75 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:46:33.18 -11:20:10.1: ref_mag=14.52 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.4404 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.43 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:51:37.07 -12:10:01.8: ref_mag=14.75 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.4731 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.43 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits at 15:50:00.82 -06:20:20.8: 14.96 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:52:08.53 -13:31:00.1: ref_mag=14.43 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.5256 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:19:11.22 -09:07:15.4: ref_mag=14.43 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.4479 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-03-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 15:51:11.53 -07:21:16.6: 14.72 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-03-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 15:47:16.31 -06:17:29.7: 14.88 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.78 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-03-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 15:08:07.45 -10:17:58.8: 14.59 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:51:11.53 -07:21:16.6: ref_mag=14.78 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.5402 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.75 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:47:16.31 -06:17:29.7: ref_mag=14.75 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.5236 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.38 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:08:07.45 -10:17:58.8: ref_mag=14.38 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.4393 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-03-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 15:50:00.82 -06:20:20.8: 14.64 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.76 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:50:00.82 -06:20:20.8: ref_mag=14.76 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.5710 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits at 15:52:51.33 -07:57:25.2: 15.00 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits at 15:51:43.55 -06:33:57.0: 14.55 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits at 15:18:31.08 -13:28:16.4: 14.55 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits at 15:46:26.01 -09:56:32.7: 14.94 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits at 15:52:02.01 -06:04:27.2: 14.80 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits at 15:32:16.21 -09:36:11.7: 14.35 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits at 15:19:58.26 -13:49:56.7: 15.25 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-03-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 15:51:43.55 -06:33:57.0: 14.67 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-03-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 15:46:26.01 -09:56:32.7: 14.50 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-03-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 15:52:51.33 -07:57:25.2: 14.65 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-03-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 15:18:31.08 -13:28:16.4: 14.45 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits at 15:51:18.41 -08:54:39.1: 15.47 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.60 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.63 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.77 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.49 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:51:43.55 -06:33:57.0: ref_mag=14.60 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.6188 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:52:51.33 -07:57:25.2: ref_mag=14.77 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.5479 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:46:26.01 -09:56:32.7: ref_mag=14.63 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.5388 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:18:31.08 -13:28:16.4: ref_mag=14.49 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.4430 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-03-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 15:32:16.21 -09:36:11.7: 14.33 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-03-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 15:52:02.01 -06:04:27.2: 14.66 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-03-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 15:19:58.26 -13:49:56.7: 14.95 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.34 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:32:16.21 -09:36:11.7: ref_mag=14.34 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.3936 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.73 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.06 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:52:02.01 -06:04:27.2: ref_mag=14.73 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.5944 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:19:58.26 -13:49:56.7: ref_mag=15.06 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.5039 delta=0.55 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-03-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 15:51:18.41 -08:54:39.1: 14.81 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.81 +/- 0.20
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:51:18.41 -08:54:39.1: ref_mag=14.81 +/- 0.20 new_mean_mag=14.5511 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits at 15:19:43.45 -11:22:34.3: 14.73 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits at 15:51:39.06 -07:50:02.4: 14.87 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits at 15:42:18.97 -07:56:40.0: 14.60 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits at 15:47:48.24 -11:42:33.1: 14.48 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits at 15:52:53.08 -10:57:14.8: 14.90 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits at 15:49:43.39 -12:55:25.8: 14.82 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits at 15:49:45.17 -06:07:27.7: 14.89 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-03-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 15:42:18.97 -07:56:40.0: 14.58 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-03-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 15:51:39.06 -07:50:02.4: 14.71 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-03-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 15:19:43.45 -11:22:34.3: 14.85 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.79 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.59 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.79 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-03-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 15:47:48.24 -11:42:33.1: 14.70 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:19:43.45 -11:22:34.3: ref_mag=14.79 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.5193 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:51:39.06 -07:50:02.4: ref_mag=14.79 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.6279 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:42:18.97 -07:56:40.0: ref_mag=14.59 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.3994 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits at 15:44:57.86 -13:45:07.0: 14.86 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.56 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:47:48.24 -11:42:33.1: ref_mag=14.56 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.5431 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-03-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 15:52:53.08 -10:57:14.8: 14.29 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-03-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 15:49:43.39 -12:55:25.8: 14.82 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.42 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:52:53.08 -10:57:14.8: ref_mag=14.42 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.5937 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.82 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:49:43.39 -12:55:25.8: ref_mag=14.82 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.5331 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-03-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 15:49:45.17 -06:07:27.7: 14.61 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.72 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:49:45.17 -06:07:27.7: ref_mag=14.72 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.5203 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-03-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 15:44:57.86 -13:45:07.0: 14.67 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.75 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:44:57.86 -13:45:07.0: ref_mag=14.75 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.5729 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits at 15:07:44.83 -10:52:48.0: 15.65 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits at 15:08:31.51 -06:01:55.3: 14.90 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits at 15:50:54.88 -11:18:26.9: 14.79 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits at 15:50:18.93 -07:51:03.6: 14.93 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits at 15:45:54.29 -06:51:39.3: 14.66 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits at 15:38:15.37 -06:58:21.4: 14.72 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits at 15:45:49.17 -06:23:19.3: 14.59 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-03-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 15:08:31.51 -06:01:55.3: 14.95 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-03-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 15:50:54.88 -11:18:26.9: 15.04 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-03-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 15:07:44.83 -10:52:48.0: 15.70 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.93 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.90 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-03-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 15:50:18.93 -07:51:03.6: 14.76 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:08:31.51 -06:01:55.3: ref_mag=14.93 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.4978 delta=0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:50:54.88 -11:18:26.9: ref_mag=14.90 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.6007 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.83 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:50:18.93 -07:51:03.6: ref_mag=14.83 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.6420 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits at 15:53:52.35 -12:42:58.6: 14.59 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-03-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 15:38:15.37 -06:58:21.4: 14.86 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-03-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 15:45:54.29 -06:51:39.3: 14.73 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-03-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 15:45:49.17 -06:23:19.3: 14.73 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.78 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:38:15.37 -06:58:21.4: ref_mag=14.78 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.5464 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.70 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:45:54.29 -06:51:39.3: ref_mag=14.70 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.6088 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.65 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:45:49.17 -06:23:19.3: ref_mag=14.65 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.4629 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-03-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 15:53:52.35 -12:42:58.6: 14.54 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.56 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:53:52.35 -12:42:58.6: ref_mag=14.56 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.6339 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits at 15:53:15.38 -14:00:28.9: 14.64 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits at 15:51:23.21 -13:03:03.1: 14.69 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits at 15:51:25.29 -10:40:57.3: 15.11 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits at 15:43:24.85 -12:09:03.4: 15.23 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits at 15:19:09.49 -14:04:35.0: 15.05 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits at 15:45:04.05 -14:01:41.4: 14.78 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-03-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 15:51:23.21 -13:03:03.1: 14.66 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-03-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 15:53:15.38 -14:00:28.9: 14.51 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-03-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 15:51:25.29 -10:40:57.3: 14.85 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.67 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.57 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:51:23.21 -13:03:03.1: ref_mag=14.67 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.5945 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.95 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:53:15.38 -14:00:28.9: ref_mag=14.57 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.5961 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:51:25.29 -10:40:57.3: ref_mag=14.95 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=14.6384 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits at 15:26:59.22 -14:01:53.1: 14.81 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-03-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 15:43:24.85 -12:09:03.4: 15.57 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-03-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 15:19:09.49 -14:04:35.0: 14.98 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-03-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 15:45:04.05 -14:01:41.4: 14.78 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.23 +/- 0.28
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:43:24.85 -12:09:03.4: ref_mag=15.23 +/- 0.28 new_mean_mag=14.6438 delta=0.59 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.01 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.78 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:19:09.49 -14:04:35.0: ref_mag=15.01 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.6277 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:45:04.05 -14:01:41.4: ref_mag=14.78 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.6752 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-03-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 15:26:59.22 -14:01:53.1: 14.66 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.73 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:26:59.22 -14:01:53.1: ref_mag=14.73 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.5629 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits at 15:07:46.35 -07:52:32.4: 14.67 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits at 15:30:14.90 -12:47:58.7: 15.02 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-02-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0231.fits at 15:13:50.47 -12:21:10.3: 14.53 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-03-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 15:30:14.90 -12:47:58.7: 15.03 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-03-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 15:07:46.35 -07:52:32.4: 14.79 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-03-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 15:13:50.47 -12:21:10.3: 14.75 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.02 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.72 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.61 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:30:14.90 -12:47:58.7: ref_mag=15.02 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.6229 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:07:46.35 -07:52:32.4: ref_mag=14.72 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.5400 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:13:50.47 -12:21:10.3: ref_mag=14.61 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.5929 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53958.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53970.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54315.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 7s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53894_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 53894_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53902_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 53902_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53903_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 53903_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53905_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 53905_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:47:59.69 -08:24:00.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53907_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 53907_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:39:19.33 -10:57:25.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53912_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 53912_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:39:04.69 -09:23:38.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53914_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 53914_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53933_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 53933_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:47:58.66 -09:08:41.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53958_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249
Preparing report for the candidate 53958_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53970_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249
Preparing report for the candidate 53970_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54001_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 54001_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54005_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 54005_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54054_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 54054_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54137_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 54137_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:50:09.01 -05:57:16.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54155_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 54155_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54158_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 54158_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54174_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 54174_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54197_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 54197_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54202_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 54202_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54203_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 54203_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54205_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 54205_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54206_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 54206_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54226_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 54226_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54230_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 54230_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54231_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 54231_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54239_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 54239_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54240_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 54240_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54242_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 54242_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54243_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 54243_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54247_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 54247_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54251_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 54251_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54261_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 54261_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54264_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 54264_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54272_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 54272_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54273_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 54273_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54278_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 54278_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54279_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 54279_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54280_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 54280_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54282_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 54282_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54286_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 54286_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54293_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 54293_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54295_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 54295_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54299_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 54299_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54309_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 54309_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54311_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 54311_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54313_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 54313_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54314_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 54314_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54315_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249
Preparing report for the candidate 54315_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54319_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 54319_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54326_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 54326_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54334_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 54334_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54338_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 54338_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54343_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 54343_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54357_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 54357_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54359_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 54359_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54369_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 54369_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54376_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 54376_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54380_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 54380_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54396_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 54396_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54408_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 54408_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54411_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 54411_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54422_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 54422_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54457_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 54457_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54476_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 54476_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54530_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 54530_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14363_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 14363_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:21:45.64 -08:14:39.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 19981_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 19981_fd_Lib-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-20-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks