This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_023359_TTUQ2b1x1_1257996_o9D8KIAb
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 09.2699 2461169.7699 12.80 17:13:03.12 -28:53:28.8
356.10359 5.97079 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.0" and 8.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.108 Hecuba 3 1 3 12.8 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 17:13:03.12 -28:53:28.8: 15.03 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 17:13:03.12 -28:53:28.8: 14.88 +/- 0.34 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.88 +/- 0.34
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461169.7699,12.80,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260509.2699 12.80CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 09.2699 2461169.7699 12.86 17:08:24.03 -29:05:48.9
355.33635 6.67457 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 8.0 pix
The object was found in VSX 6" Gaia DR3 6029154079496167552
Type: E
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
18.290 G 18.560 G 0.459970000000
The object was found in astcheck.1048 Feodosia 2 0 2 12.8 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 17:08:24.03 -29:05:48.9: 14.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 17:08:24.03 -29:05:48.9: 14.76 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 6029154079496167552,2461169.7699,12.86,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 6029154079496167552 20260509.2699 12.86CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 09.2699 2461169.7699 13.04 17:16:57.55 -26:32:16.5
358.53996 6.62017 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 7.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.175 Andromache 1 0 1 13.3 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 17:16:57.55 -26:32:16.5: 15.31 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 17:16:57.55 -26:32:16.5: 15.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461169.7699,13.04,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260509.2699 13.04CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 09.2699 2461169.7699 13.05 17:12:08.75 -22:36:54.4
1.15792 9.76221 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.5" and 8.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.121 Hermione 1 2 2 12.9 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 17:12:08.75 -22:36:54.4: 15.27 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 17:12:08.75 -22:36:54.4: 15.06 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461169.7699,13.05,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260509.2699 13.05CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461118.94973911 19.03.2026 10:47:27.459 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
First image: 2461118.94973911 19.03.2026 10:47:27.459 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
Last image: 2461169.77021218 09.05.2026 06:28:56.332 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_023359_TTUQ2b1x1_1257996_o9D8KIAb/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 2
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.44
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 7505
Objects passed selection criteria: 7503
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 6545.5
Average stars matched: 6360.75 (97.1775 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 114348 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed May 6 12:14:36 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-43-g0c21e0c3
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat May 9 04:05:38 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461118.94973911 19.03.2026 10:47:27.459 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
First image: 2461118.94973911 19.03.2026 10:47:27.459 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
Last image: 2461169.77021218 09.05.2026 06:28:56.332 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_023359_TTUQ2b1x1_1257996_o9D8KIAb/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 128
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.05
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 32 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 83051
Objects passed selection criteria: 82926
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.2 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.2 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 74788.2
Average stars matched: 72348.5 (96.7378 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1950116 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed May 6 12:14:36 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-43-g0c21e0c3
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat May 9 04:08:32 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_023359_TTUQ2b1x1_1257996_o9D8KIAb/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_023359_TTUQ2b1x1_1257996_o9D8KIAb/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_023359_TTUQ2b1x1_1257996_o9D8KIAb/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_023359_TTUQ2b1x1_1257996_o9D8KIAb/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461169.76951678
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
'asassn_transients_list.txt' -> '../asassn_transients_list.txt'
'tns_transients_list.txt' -> '../tns_transients_list.txt'
wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits'
wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits'
wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits'
wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
Image size: 937.6'x624.8' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:16:47.272 -26:00:40.45 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits
Image size: 938.3'x624.8' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:16:46.343 -25:58:14.19 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:16:47.272 -26:00:40.45
Second-epoch image center 17:16:46.343 -25:58:14.19
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0408 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197.fits
Image size: 938.2'x624.8' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:16:48.567 -25:57:38.04 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:16:47.272 -26:00:40.45
Second-epoch image center 17:16:48.567 -25:57:38.04
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0509 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 17:16:46.343 -25:58:14.19
Second-epoch second image center 17:16:48.567 -25:57:38.04
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01305 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits &> /tmp/tmp.8LVyb0HL9N
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits &> /tmp/tmp.1cnozIkMvr
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_023359_TTUQ2b1x1_1257996_o9D8KIAb/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits &> /tmp/tmp.UkdHnsWHxh
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_023359_TTUQ2b1x1_1257996_o9D8KIAb/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_023359_TTUQ2b1x1_1257996_o9D8KIAb/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Td4fW1nRgY
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_023359_TTUQ2b1x1_1257996_o9D8KIAb/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits and wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits and wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits and wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits) and catalog (wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 11434 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 250.0424 to 268.2082 deg, Dec -31.2975 to -20.4648 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 250.0424 to 268.2082 deg, Dec -31.2975 to -20.4648 deg
Loaded 11333 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7330 out of 7692 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7692 out of 11434 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.802900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.802900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.44
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.36
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.36
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 11434 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 250.0424 to 268.2082 deg, Dec -31.2975 to -20.4648 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 250.0424 to 268.2082 deg, Dec -31.2975 to -20.4648 deg
Loaded 11333 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7330 out of 7692 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7692 out of 11434 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits (aperture=6.3)
Read 10448 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 249.7244 to 267.9414 deg, Dec -31.5299 to -20.1054 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 249.7244 to 267.9414 deg, Dec -31.5299 to -20.1054 deg
Loaded 11826 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7072 out of 7305 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7305 out of 10448 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits (aperture=6.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 1 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.5 pix Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
2.7 pix Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
2.6 pix fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits
2.6 pix fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197.fits
2.5 pix wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
2.7 pix wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.4 mag. Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
14.2 mag. Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
13.8 mag. fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits
13.8 mag. fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.8 (SNR ) 11.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.8LVyb0HL9N (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-09_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_023359_TTUQ2b1x1_1257996_o9D8KIAb/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=894, passed=11434
Got 11434 stars (including 10527 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11434 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 931 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 908 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.62"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11116 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.63"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 931 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11116 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.63"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11116 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.66"
Excluding outliers - 927 stars left (next iteration limit 1019)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits -region wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.1cnozIkMvr (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-09_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_023359_TTUQ2b1x1_1257996_o9D8KIAb/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=616, passed=10448
Got 10448 stars (including 9823 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10448 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 928 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 906 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10125 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 927 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10122 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10122 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 922 stars left (next iteration limit 1016)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits -region wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.UkdHnsWHxh (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-09_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_023359_TTUQ2b1x1_1257996_o9D8KIAb/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_023359_TTUQ2b1x1_1257996_o9D8KIAb/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_023359_TTUQ2b1x1_1257996_o9D8KIAb/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_023359_TTUQ2b1x1_1257996_o9D8KIAb/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_023359_TTUQ2b1x1_1257996_o9D8KIAb/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_023359_TTUQ2b1x1_1257996_o9D8KIAb/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_023359_TTUQ2b1x1_1257996_o9D8KIAb/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_023359_TTUQ2b1x1_1257996_o9D8KIAb/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=474, passed=6691
Got 6691 stars (including 6210 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6691 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013032 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010426 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.2 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 931 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 926 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 911 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.64"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 926 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6554 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.66"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.2 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 931 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 926 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6556 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.66"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 926 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6556 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.67"
Excluding outliers - 926 stars left (next iteration limit 1018)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_023359_TTUQ2b1x1_1257996_o9D8KIAb/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Td4fW1nRgY (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-09_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_023359_TTUQ2b1x1_1257996_o9D8KIAb/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_023359_TTUQ2b1x1_1257996_o9D8KIAb/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_023359_TTUQ2b1x1_1257996_o9D8KIAb/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_023359_TTUQ2b1x1_1257996_o9D8KIAb/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_023359_TTUQ2b1x1_1257996_o9D8KIAb/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_023359_TTUQ2b1x1_1257996_o9D8KIAb/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_023359_TTUQ2b1x1_1257996_o9D8KIAb/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_023359_TTUQ2b1x1_1257996_o9D8KIAb/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=467, passed=6774
Got 6774 stars (including 6298 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6774 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013031 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010424 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.2 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 929 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 911 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.65"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6633 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.67"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.2 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 929 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6632 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.67"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6632 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.68"
Excluding outliers - 924 stars left (next iteration limit 1016)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_023359_TTUQ2b1x1_1257996_o9D8KIAb/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_023359_TTUQ2b1x1_1257996_o9D8KIAb/wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_023359_TTUQ2b1x1_1257996_o9D8KIAb/wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Oph-08-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 17:25:35.21 -26:50:47.5: 10.07 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 17:25:35.21 -26:50:47.5: 10.08 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.07 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:25:35.21 -26:50:47.5: ref_mag=10.07 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.3740 delta=-0.30 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20671_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 20671_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Oph-08-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_023359_TTUQ2b1x1_1257996_o9D8KIAb/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_023359_TTUQ2b1x1_1257996_o9D8KIAb/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_023359_TTUQ2b1x1_1257996_o9D8KIAb/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_023359_TTUQ2b1x1_1257996_o9D8KIAb/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
Image size: 937.6'x624.8' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:16:47.272 -26:00:40.45 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits
Image size: 938.3'x624.8' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:16:46.343 -25:58:14.19 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:16:47.272 -26:00:40.45
Second-epoch image center 17:16:46.343 -25:58:14.19
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0408 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197.fits
Image size: 938.2'x624.8' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:16:48.567 -25:57:38.04 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:16:47.272 -26:00:40.45
Second-epoch image center 17:16:48.567 -25:57:38.04
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0509 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 17:16:46.343 -25:58:14.19
Second-epoch second image center 17:16:48.567 -25:57:38.04
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01305 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits &> /tmp/tmp.JfN5lUxmWB
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits &> /tmp/tmp.bgeLhJjiX6
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_023359_TTUQ2b1x1_1257996_o9D8KIAb/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Buk5RplxK3
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_023359_TTUQ2b1x1_1257996_o9D8KIAb/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_023359_TTUQ2b1x1_1257996_o9D8KIAb/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197.fits &> /tmp/tmp.yfOLUESFNz
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_023359_TTUQ2b1x1_1257996_o9D8KIAb/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits and wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits and wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits and wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits) and catalog (wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 128283 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 250.0047 to 268.2082 deg, Dec -31.2994 to -20.4316 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 250.0047 to 268.2082 deg, Dec -31.2994 to -20.4316 deg
Loaded 11378 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7909 out of 9675 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9675 out of 128283 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.584200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.584200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.05
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.53
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.53
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 128283 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 250.0047 to 268.2082 deg, Dec -31.2994 to -20.4316 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 250.0047 to 268.2082 deg, Dec -31.2994 to -20.4316 deg
Loaded 11378 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7909 out of 9675 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9675 out of 128283 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 109163 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 249.6942 to 267.9448 deg, Dec -31.5317 to -20.0498 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 249.6942 to 267.9448 deg, Dec -31.5317 to -20.0498 deg
Loaded 11895 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8453 out of 9764 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9764 out of 109163 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits (aperture=4.7)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 73 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
2.4 pix Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
2.3 pix fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits
2.3 pix fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
2.4 pix wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.5 mag. Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
14.4 mag. Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
13.9 mag. fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits
13.9 mag. fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.9 (SNR ) 13.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.JfN5lUxmWB (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-09_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_023359_TTUQ2b1x1_1257996_o9D8KIAb/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=15, blended=11806, passed=128268
Got 128268 stars (including 116305 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 128268 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 921 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.62"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 124241 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 124240 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 124239 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Excluding outliers - 937 stars left (next iteration limit 1030)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits -region wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.bgeLhJjiX6 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-09_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_023359_TTUQ2b1x1_1257996_o9D8KIAb/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=1, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=7684, passed=109157
Got 109157 stars (including 101310 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 109157 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 930 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 911 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 105754 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 930 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 926 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 105752 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 926 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 105749 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 926 stars left (next iteration limit 1019)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits -region wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Buk5RplxK3 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-09_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_023359_TTUQ2b1x1_1257996_o9D8KIAb/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_023359_TTUQ2b1x1_1257996_o9D8KIAb/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_023359_TTUQ2b1x1_1257996_o9D8KIAb/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_023359_TTUQ2b1x1_1257996_o9D8KIAb/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_023359_TTUQ2b1x1_1257996_o9D8KIAb/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_023359_TTUQ2b1x1_1257996_o9D8KIAb/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_023359_TTUQ2b1x1_1257996_o9D8KIAb/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_023359_TTUQ2b1x1_1257996_o9D8KIAb/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=1, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=12, blended=4802, passed=74075
Got 74075 stars (including 69140 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 74075 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013032 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010426 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.2 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 937 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 931 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 910 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.63"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 931 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 72078 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.62"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.2 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 937 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 931 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 72078 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.62"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 931 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 72076 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.64"
Excluding outliers - 931 stars left (next iteration limit 1024)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_023359_TTUQ2b1x1_1257996_o9D8KIAb/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.yfOLUESFNz (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-09_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_023359_TTUQ2b1x1_1257996_o9D8KIAb/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_023359_TTUQ2b1x1_1257996_o9D8KIAb/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_023359_TTUQ2b1x1_1257996_o9D8KIAb/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_023359_TTUQ2b1x1_1257996_o9D8KIAb/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_023359_TTUQ2b1x1_1257996_o9D8KIAb/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_023359_TTUQ2b1x1_1257996_o9D8KIAb/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_023359_TTUQ2b1x1_1257996_o9D8KIAb/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_023359_TTUQ2b1x1_1257996_o9D8KIAb/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=15, blended=4915, passed=73959
Got 73959 stars (including 68920 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 73959 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013031 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010424 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.2 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 936 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 907 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.64"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 71981 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.62"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.2 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 936 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 71980 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.62"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 71979 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.64"
Excluding outliers - 930 stars left (next iteration limit 1023)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_023359_TTUQ2b1x1_1257996_o9D8KIAb/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_023359_TTUQ2b1x1_1257996_o9D8KIAb/wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_023359_TTUQ2b1x1_1257996_o9D8KIAb/wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Oph-08-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 17:30:15.55 -30:02:37.5: 12.87 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 16:59:03.89 -23:15:31.2: 12.94 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 17:12:56.15 -24:44:46.5: 13.02 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 17:02:29.88 -26:56:43.6: 13.10 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 17:23:07.05 -29:26:14.5: 13.23 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 17:01:52.81 -21:58:37.8: 13.09 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 17:23:55.69 -21:53:16.1: 13.53 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 17:01:22.75 -27:57:29.8: 13.21 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 17:23:07.05 -29:26:14.5: 13.32 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 17:02:29.88 -26:56:43.6: 13.10 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.26 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 17:30:15.55 -30:02:37.5: 12.93 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:23:07.05 -29:26:14.5: ref_mag=13.26 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.5293 delta=-0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.10 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:02:29.88 -26:56:43.6: ref_mag=13.10 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.1537 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.90 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:30:15.55 -30:02:37.5: ref_mag=12.90 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.0904 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 17:01:52.81 -21:58:37.8: 12.71 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 17:12:56.15 -24:44:46.5: 12.89 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.87 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:01:52.81 -21:58:37.8: ref_mag=12.87 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1329 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.96 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:12:56.15 -24:44:46.5: ref_mag=12.96 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.9191 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 17:26:34.71 -28:22:46.2: 12.82 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 16:59:03.89 -23:15:31.2: 12.73 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 17:23:55.69 -21:53:16.1: 13.41 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.48 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.83 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:23:55.69 -21:53:16.1: ref_mag=13.48 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.6141 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:59:03.89 -23:15:31.2: ref_mag=12.83 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1030 delta=-0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 17:01:22.75 -27:57:29.8: 13.32 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.25 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:01:22.75 -27:57:29.8: ref_mag=13.25 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.2033 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 17:26:34.71 -28:22:46.2: 12.97 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.87 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:26:34.71 -28:22:46.2: ref_mag=12.87 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.1855 delta=-0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 17:12:41.46 -29:47:41.3: 12.67 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 17:29:43.55 -29:54:42.7: 12.63 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 17:25:59.77 -29:23:20.2: 12.76 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 17:29:48.98 -30:03:13.7: 12.58 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 17:12:41.46 -29:47:41.3: 12.82 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.73 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:12:41.46 -29:47:41.3: ref_mag=12.73 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.9671 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 17:00:22.21 -29:49:57.1: 12.50 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 17:25:39.86 -29:22:15.9: 12.54 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 17:29:43.55 -29:54:42.7: 12.69 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.65 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:29:43.55 -29:54:42.7: ref_mag=12.65 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.7216 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 17:01:57.48 -24:46:30.8: 12.09 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 17:25:35.29 -26:50:42.7: 10.42 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 17:25:59.77 -29:23:20.2: 12.85 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.79 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:25:59.77 -29:23:20.2: ref_mag=12.79 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.7759 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 17:29:48.98 -30:03:13.7: 12.70 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.63 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:29:48.98 -30:03:13.7: ref_mag=12.63 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.7046 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 17:00:22.21 -29:49:57.1: 12.54 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.52 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:00:22.21 -29:49:57.1: ref_mag=12.52 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.6993 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 17:25:39.86 -29:22:15.9: 12.54 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.54 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:25:39.86 -29:22:15.9: ref_mag=12.54 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.6385 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 17:01:57.48 -24:46:30.8: 11.92 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.01 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:01:57.48 -24:46:30.8: ref_mag=12.01 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2658 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 17:25:35.29 -26:50:42.7: 10.39 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.40 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:25:35.29 -26:50:42.7: ref_mag=10.40 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.8601 delta=-0.46 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 17:36:27.26 -29:10:37.2: 10.96 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 17:33:33.78 -29:18:58.2: 12.02 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 17:36:27.26 -29:10:37.2: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.96 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:36:27.26 -29:10:37.2: ref_mag=10.96 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.2440 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 17:33:33.78 -29:18:58.2: 11.97 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.00 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:33:33.78 -29:18:58.2: ref_mag=12.00 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.0195 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 16:58:45.99 -29:16:05.0: 12.54 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 17:13:03.12 -28:53:28.8: 15.03 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 17:08:24.03 -29:05:48.9: 14.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 16:58:45.99 -29:16:05.0: 12.54 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.54 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:58:45.99 -29:16:05.0: ref_mag=12.54 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.6659 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 17:16:57.55 -26:32:16.5: 15.31 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 17:25:17.30 -29:40:35.4: 12.87 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 17:13:03.12 -28:53:28.8: 14.88 +/- 0.34 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 17:12:08.75 -22:36:54.4: 15.27 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.88 +/- 0.34
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 17:13:03.12 -28:53:28.8: ref_mag=14.88 +/- 0.34 new_mean_mag=12.8001 delta=2.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 17:19:54.05 -29:59:43.2: 13.15 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 17:08:24.03 -29:05:48.9: 14.76 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 17:16:57.55 -26:32:16.5: 15.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 17:25:17.30 -29:40:35.4: 12.89 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.88 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:25:17.30 -29:40:35.4: ref_mag=12.88 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.9707 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 17:12:08.75 -22:36:54.4: 15.06 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 17:36:56.69 -29:48:47.8: 12.84 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 17:19:54.05 -29:59:43.2: 13.25 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.19 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:19:54.05 -29:59:43.2: ref_mag=13.19 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.0058 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 17:36:56.69 -29:48:47.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.84 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 17:26:10.20 -28:57:45.2: 13.19 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:36:56.69 -29:48:47.8: ref_mag=12.84 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.1656 delta=-0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 17:26:10.20 -28:57:45.2: 13.21 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.20 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:26:10.20 -28:57:45.2: ref_mag=13.20 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.1776 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 17:18:33.64 -28:42:28.6: 14.39 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 17:30:05.58 -29:24:43.0: 13.35 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 16:48:24.37 -26:26:55.6: 14.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 17:33:40.50 -29:38:10.3: 13.16 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 17:18:33.64 -28:42:28.6: 14.10 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.22 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:18:33.64 -28:42:28.6: ref_mag=14.22 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.4143 delta=0.81 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 17:30:05.58 -29:24:43.0: 13.44 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.38 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:30:05.58 -29:24:43.0: ref_mag=13.38 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.4338 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 16:48:24.37 -26:26:55.6: 14.35 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.35 +/- 0.23
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 16:48:24.37 -26:26:55.6: ref_mag=14.35 +/- 0.23 new_mean_mag=13.4386 delta=0.91 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 17:33:40.50 -29:38:10.3: 13.14 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.15 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:33:40.50 -29:38:10.3: ref_mag=13.15 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.4828 delta=-0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 17:33:30.63 -29:26:35.5: 13.87 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 17:33:30.63 -29:26:35.5: 14.24 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.97 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:33:30.63 -29:26:35.5: ref_mag=13.97 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.6988 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 16:50:49.65 -25:00:43.6: 13.50 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 16:53:40.19 -27:32:43.5: 12.10 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 16:54:11.89 -28:53:22.7: 13.73 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 16:50:49.65 -25:00:43.6: 13.38 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.44 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:50:49.65 -25:00:43.6: ref_mag=13.44 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=12.5413 delta=0.90 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 16:53:40.19 -27:32:43.5: 12.02 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.06 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:53:40.19 -27:32:43.5: ref_mag=12.06 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.9587 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 16:54:11.89 -28:53:22.7: 13.48 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.60 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:54:11.89 -28:53:22.7: ref_mag=13.60 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=12.8237 delta=0.78 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out147476.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out147176.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out147202.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out147246.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out147305.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 11s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146745_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 146745_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146749_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 146749_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:24:18.14 -28:22:54.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146750_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 146750_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146781_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 146781_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146787_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 146787_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146793_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 146793_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146794_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 146794_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146795_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 146795_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146797_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 146797_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:00:31.34 -29:30:08.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146799_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 146799_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146801_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 146801_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:53:30.33 -23:11:34.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146807_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 146807_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146815_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 146815_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:28:48.59 -30:03:11.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146828_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 146828_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:56:21.36 -29:55:50.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146830_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 146830_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146832_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 146832_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:31:58.76 -28:00:12.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146833_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 146833_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:52:54.51 -24:08:25.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146838_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 146838_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:05:38.01 -22:53:11.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146839_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 146839_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146846_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 146846_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146847_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 146847_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146848_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 146848_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146849_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 146849_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146855_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 146855_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146861_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 146861_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:08:38.09 -28:12:33.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146864_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 146864_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:19:10.03 -28:15:40.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146868_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 146868_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146873_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 146873_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146938_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 146938_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147012_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 147012_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147053_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 147053_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:27:39.57 -27:40:01.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147084_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 147084_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:18:55.38 -22:43:34.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147099_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 147099_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:58:44.74 -29:34:43.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147109_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 147109_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:58:14.68 -29:31:15.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147142_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 147142_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147145_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 147145_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:28:21.98 -29:04:19.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147147_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 147147_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:02:50.15 -27:44:59.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147161_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 147161_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:47:19.27 -24:53:59.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147165_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 147165_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:29:16.95 -29:54:26.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147176_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197
Preparing report for the candidate 147176_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147202_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197
Preparing report for the candidate 147202_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147207_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 147207_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:02:50.53 -27:57:14.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147226_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 147226_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147246_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197
Preparing report for the candidate 147246_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147305_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197
Preparing report for the candidate 147305_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147307_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 147307_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147309_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 147309_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:13:07.08 -28:14:47.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147330_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 147330_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:00:16.83 -29:15:57.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147335_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 147335_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147337_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 147337_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147340_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 147340_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:17:58.21 -29:24:55.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147349_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 147349_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:28:01.01 -22:29:51.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147415_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 147415_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:34:56.42 -22:40:55.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147470_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 147470_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147474_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 147474_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147476_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 147476_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:48:24.37 -26:26:55.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.44, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.42)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.563 6034184997976927360 252.10250699222 -26.44926019876 13.0710 11.5918 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.563#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147477_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 147477_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:06:29.05 -22:41:57.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147510_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 147510_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147516_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 147516_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:25:23.01 -27:34:52.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147523_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 147523_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:18:29.73 -28:14:48.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147555_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 147555_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147558_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 147558_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:50:25.50 -26:53:37.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147589_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 147589_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:33:22.88 -21:40:22.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 141132_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 141132_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:09:12.50 -28:42:11.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59225_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 59225_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:04:25.75 -27:02:09.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 141401_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 141401_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:52:31.10 -25:42:31.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 140903_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 140903_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:02:16.73 -24:13:08.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 140201_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 140201_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:58:18.58 -25:34:11.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 140045_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 140045_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:11:09.58 -22:44:44.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 140004_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 140004_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51103_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 51103_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 13684_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 13684_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:04:51.87 -30:05:08.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30432_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 30432_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks