This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_021753_TTUQ2b1x1_3116758_OoBKY0AT
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 09.2905 2461169.7905 11.20 14:39:31.12 -13:29:57.4
339.16984 41.64376 galactic Lib Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 3.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.116 Sirona 1 -0 1 11.1 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:39:31.12 -13:29:57.4: 15.47 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:39:31.12 -13:29:57.4: 15.38 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461169.7905,11.20,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260509.2905 11.20CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 09.2905 2461169.7905 12.03 14:25:14.29 -12:27:47.0
335.83659 44.33366 galactic Lib Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 3.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.79 Eurynome 1 -1 1 11.8 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:25:14.29 -12:27:47.0: 15.71 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:25:14.29 -12:27:47.0: 15.59 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461169.7905,12.03,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260509.2905 12.03CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 09.2905 2461169.7905 13.01 14:17:21.15 -11:52:09.8
333.84961 45.78165 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 3.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.599 Luisa 1 0 1 12.8 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:17:21.15 -11:52:09.8: 15.66 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:17:21.15 -11:52:09.8: 15.58 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 09.2905* 14 17 21.15 -11 52 09.8 13.0 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461169.7905,13.01,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260509.2905 13.01CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 09.2905 2461169.7905 13.72 14:50:36.50 -09:14:50.7
345.51684 43.55451 galactic Lib Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.5" and 3.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.758 Mancunia 1 -0 1 13.5 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:50:36.50 -09:14:50.7: 15.62 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:50:36.50 -09:14:50.7: 15.65 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461169.7905,13.72,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260509.2905 13.72CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461093.88465544 22.02.2026 09:13:44.230 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
First image: 2461093.88465544 22.02.2026 09:13:44.230 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
Last image: 2461169.79070977 09.05.2026 06:58:27.324 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_021753_TTUQ2b1x1_3116758_OoBKY0AT/fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 2
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.96
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 6369
Objects passed selection criteria: 6353
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 5000.25
Average stars matched: 4380.5 (87.6056 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 111824 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed May 6 12:14:36 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-43-g0c21e0c3
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat May 9 02:29:40 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461093.88465544 22.02.2026 09:13:44.230 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
First image: 2461093.88465544 22.02.2026 09:13:44.230 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
Last image: 2461169.79070977 09.05.2026 06:58:27.324 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_021753_TTUQ2b1x1_3116758_OoBKY0AT/fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 131
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.61
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 19 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 37785
Objects passed selection criteria: 37694
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 30970.8
Average stars matched: 27554 (88.9678 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 137600 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed May 6 12:14:36 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-43-g0c21e0c3
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat May 9 02:31:50 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_021753_TTUQ2b1x1_3116758_OoBKY0AT/fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-57-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_021753_TTUQ2b1x1_3116758_OoBKY0AT/fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_021753_TTUQ2b1x1_3116758_OoBKY0AT/fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-57-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_021753_TTUQ2b1x1_3116758_OoBKY0AT/fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461169.79020736
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits'
wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits'
wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-57-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-57-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-57-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-57-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits'
wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
Image size: 941.9'x627.3' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:34:21.145 -10:00:32.83 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-57-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-57-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:34:14.859 -10:03:27.90 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 14:34:21.145 -10:00:32.83
Second-epoch image center 14:34:14.859 -10:03:27.90
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0550 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:34:16.038 -10:03:19.82 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 14:34:21.145 -10:00:32.83
Second-epoch image center 14:34:16.038 -10:03:19.82
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0509 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 14:34:14.859 -10:03:27.90
Second-epoch second image center 14:34:16.038 -10:03:19.82
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00533 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits &> /tmp/tmp.4sxAQNJGYd
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits &> /tmp/tmp.DJi0G8wouo
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_021753_TTUQ2b1x1_3116758_OoBKY0AT/fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-57-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits &> /tmp/tmp.GsPJNXITfG
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_021753_TTUQ2b1x1_3116758_OoBKY0AT/fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-57-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_021753_TTUQ2b1x1_3116758_OoBKY0AT/fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225.fits &> /tmp/tmp.tsU7QJur9d
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_021753_TTUQ2b1x1_3116758_OoBKY0AT/fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits and wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits and wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits and wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits) and catalog (wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 6254 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 210.5114 to 226.6963 deg, Dec -15.2979 to -4.6850 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 210.5114 to 226.6963 deg, Dec -15.2979 to -4.6850 deg
Loaded 4529 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3605 out of 3773 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3773 out of 6254 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.850300
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.850300
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.96
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.89
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.89
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 6254 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 210.5114 to 226.6963 deg, Dec -15.2979 to -4.6850 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 210.5114 to 226.6963 deg, Dec -15.2979 to -4.6850 deg
Loaded 4529 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3605 out of 3773 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3773 out of 6254 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits (aperture=6.4)
Read 6302 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 210.5478 to 226.6969 deg, Dec -15.3043 to -4.6253 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 210.5478 to 226.6969 deg, Dec -15.3043 to -4.6253 deg
Loaded 4559 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3588 out of 3695 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3695 out of 6302 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits (aperture=7.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 2 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
2.5 pix Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
2.4 pix fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-57-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits
2.4 pix fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
2.5 pix wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.9 mag. Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
14.8 mag. Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
14.9 mag. fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-57-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits
14.9 mag. fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.9 (SNR ) 11.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.4sxAQNJGYd (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-09_CI_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_021753_TTUQ2b1x1_3116758_OoBKY0AT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits 569.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits' -> 'wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=490, passed=6254
Got 6254 stars (including 5757 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6254 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013082 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010466 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 966 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6183 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6184 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6184 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 972 stars left (next iteration limit 1069)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits -region wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.DJi0G8wouo (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-09_CI_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_021753_TTUQ2b1x1_3116758_OoBKY0AT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits 567.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits' -> 'wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=417, passed=6302
Got 6302 stars (including 5882 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6302 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 964 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6236 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6236 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6236 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 972 stars left (next iteration limit 1069)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits -region wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.GsPJNXITfG (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-09_CI_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_021753_TTUQ2b1x1_3116758_OoBKY0AT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_021753_TTUQ2b1x1_3116758_OoBKY0AT/fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-57-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_021753_TTUQ2b1x1_3116758_OoBKY0AT/fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-57-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_021753_TTUQ2b1x1_3116758_OoBKY0AT/fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-57-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_021753_TTUQ2b1x1_3116758_OoBKY0AT/fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-57-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_021753_TTUQ2b1x1_3116758_OoBKY0AT/fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-57-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_021753_TTUQ2b1x1_3116758_OoBKY0AT/fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-57-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-57-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-57-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-57-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-57-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-57-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-57-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-57-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_021753_TTUQ2b1x1_3116758_OoBKY0AT/fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-57-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-57-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=429, passed=6742
Got 6742 stars (including 6305 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-57-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6742 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 960 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6680 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6682 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6682 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 970 stars left (next iteration limit 1067)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-57-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-57-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_021753_TTUQ2b1x1_3116758_OoBKY0AT/fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-57-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits -region wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-57-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-57-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.tsU7QJur9d (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-09_CI_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_021753_TTUQ2b1x1_3116758_OoBKY0AT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_021753_TTUQ2b1x1_3116758_OoBKY0AT/fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_021753_TTUQ2b1x1_3116758_OoBKY0AT/fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_021753_TTUQ2b1x1_3116758_OoBKY0AT/fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_021753_TTUQ2b1x1_3116758_OoBKY0AT/fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_021753_TTUQ2b1x1_3116758_OoBKY0AT/fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_021753_TTUQ2b1x1_3116758_OoBKY0AT/fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_021753_TTUQ2b1x1_3116758_OoBKY0AT/fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=450, passed=6682
Got 6682 stars (including 6227 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6682 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 957 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6627 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6628 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6628 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Excluding outliers - 967 stars left (next iteration limit 1063)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_021753_TTUQ2b1x1_3116758_OoBKY0AT/fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225.fits -region wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-57-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-57-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_021753_TTUQ2b1x1_3116758_OoBKY0AT/wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-57-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_021753_TTUQ2b1x1_3116758_OoBKY0AT/wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Lib-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:39:31.12 -13:29:57.4: 15.47 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:35:18.08 -08:57:06.0: 11.95 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:39:31.12 -13:29:57.4: 15.38 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:35:18.08 -08:57:06.0: 11.94 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.94 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:35:18.08 -08:57:06.0: ref_mag=11.94 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0136 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20988.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 7s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20988_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225
Preparing report for the candidate 20988_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21566_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225
The candidate 21566_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225 did not pass the final checks
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 8s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Lib-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
14:39:31.12 -13:29:57.4
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_021753_TTUQ2b1x1_3116758_OoBKY0AT/fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-57-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_021753_TTUQ2b1x1_3116758_OoBKY0AT/fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_021753_TTUQ2b1x1_3116758_OoBKY0AT/fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-57-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_021753_TTUQ2b1x1_3116758_OoBKY0AT/fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-57-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-57-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
Image size: 941.9'x627.3' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:34:21.145 -10:00:32.83 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-57-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-57-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:34:14.859 -10:03:27.90 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 14:34:21.145 -10:00:32.83
Second-epoch image center 14:34:14.859 -10:03:27.90
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0550 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:34:16.038 -10:03:19.82 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 14:34:21.145 -10:00:32.83
Second-epoch image center 14:34:16.038 -10:03:19.82
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0509 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 14:34:14.859 -10:03:27.90
Second-epoch second image center 14:34:16.038 -10:03:19.82
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00533 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits &> /tmp/tmp.XtJP5NSLre
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits &> /tmp/tmp.2LvlWCoRM0
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_021753_TTUQ2b1x1_3116758_OoBKY0AT/fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-57-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Zi3co384m1
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_021753_TTUQ2b1x1_3116758_OoBKY0AT/fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-57-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_021753_TTUQ2b1x1_3116758_OoBKY0AT/fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225.fits &> /tmp/tmp.AXEF4mLvsE
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_021753_TTUQ2b1x1_3116758_OoBKY0AT/fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits and wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits and wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits and wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits) and catalog (wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 40722 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 210.4556 to 226.7070 deg, Dec -15.3009 to -4.6848 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 210.4556 to 226.7070 deg, Dec -15.3009 to -4.6848 deg
Loaded 4550 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3575 out of 3952 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3952 out of 40722 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.701900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.701900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.61
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.09
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.09
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 40722 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 210.4556 to 226.7070 deg, Dec -15.3009 to -4.6848 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 210.4556 to 226.7070 deg, Dec -15.3009 to -4.6848 deg
Loaded 4550 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3575 out of 3952 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3952 out of 40722 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits (aperture=4.8)
Read 37655 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 210.5434 to 226.6969 deg, Dec -15.3297 to -4.6171 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 210.5434 to 226.6969 deg, Dec -15.3297 to -4.6171 deg
Loaded 4571 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3548 out of 3862 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3862 out of 37655 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits (aperture=5.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 96 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
2.3 pix Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
2.4 pix fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-57-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits
2.3 pix fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.1 mag. Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
15.0 mag. Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-57-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits
15.1 mag. fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.0 (SNR ) 14.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.XtJP5NSLre (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-09_CI_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_021753_TTUQ2b1x1_3116758_OoBKY0AT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits 569.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits' -> 'wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=1712, passed=40709
Got 40709 stars (including 38929 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 40709 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013082 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010466 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 965 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40241 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40240 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40240 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 973 stars left (next iteration limit 1070)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits -region wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.2LvlWCoRM0 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-09_CI_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_021753_TTUQ2b1x1_3116758_OoBKY0AT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits 567.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits' -> 'wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=18, blended=1689, passed=37637
Got 37637 stars (including 35895 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 37637 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 960 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37148 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37150 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37150 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 969 stars left (next iteration limit 1065)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits -region wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Zi3co384m1 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-09_CI_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_021753_TTUQ2b1x1_3116758_OoBKY0AT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_021753_TTUQ2b1x1_3116758_OoBKY0AT/fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-57-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_021753_TTUQ2b1x1_3116758_OoBKY0AT/fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-57-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_021753_TTUQ2b1x1_3116758_OoBKY0AT/fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-57-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_021753_TTUQ2b1x1_3116758_OoBKY0AT/fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-57-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_021753_TTUQ2b1x1_3116758_OoBKY0AT/fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-57-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_021753_TTUQ2b1x1_3116758_OoBKY0AT/fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-57-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-57-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-57-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-57-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-57-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-57-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-57-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-57-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_021753_TTUQ2b1x1_3116758_OoBKY0AT/fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-57-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-57-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=3, blended=1951, passed=37243
Got 37243 stars (including 35247 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-57-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 37243 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 959 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36993 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36992 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36992 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 968 stars left (next iteration limit 1064)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-57-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-57-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_021753_TTUQ2b1x1_3116758_OoBKY0AT/fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-57-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits -region wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-57-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-57-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.AXEF4mLvsE (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-09_CI_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_021753_TTUQ2b1x1_3116758_OoBKY0AT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_021753_TTUQ2b1x1_3116758_OoBKY0AT/fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_021753_TTUQ2b1x1_3116758_OoBKY0AT/fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_021753_TTUQ2b1x1_3116758_OoBKY0AT/fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_021753_TTUQ2b1x1_3116758_OoBKY0AT/fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_021753_TTUQ2b1x1_3116758_OoBKY0AT/fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_021753_TTUQ2b1x1_3116758_OoBKY0AT/fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_021753_TTUQ2b1x1_3116758_OoBKY0AT/fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=2132, passed=37781
Got 37781 stars (including 35607 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 37781 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 956 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37423 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37423 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37423 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 966 stars left (next iteration limit 1062)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_021753_TTUQ2b1x1_3116758_OoBKY0AT/fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225.fits -region wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-57-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_021753_TTUQ2b1x1_3116758_OoBKY0AT/wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-57-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_021753_TTUQ2b1x1_3116758_OoBKY0AT/wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Lib-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:25:14.29 -12:27:47.0: 15.71 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:39:58.52 -06:00:12.1: 14.47 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:17:21.15 -11:52:09.8: 15.66 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:25:14.29 -12:27:47.0: 15.59 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:50:36.50 -09:14:50.7: 15.62 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:39:58.52 -06:00:12.1: 14.56 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.51 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:39:58.52 -06:00:12.1: ref_mag=14.51 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.4716 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:17:21.15 -11:52:09.8: 15.58 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:50:36.50 -09:14:50.7: 15.65 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:19:14.76 -08:44:00.6: 13.89 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:38:07.04 -13:16:07.7: 14.15 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:35:49.84 -13:10:55.2: 13.80 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:19:14.76 -08:44:00.6: 13.91 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.90 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:19:14.76 -08:44:00.6: ref_mag=13.90 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.9887 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:38:07.04 -13:16:07.7: 14.53 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:35:49.84 -13:10:55.2: 13.73 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.27 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:38:07.04 -13:16:07.7: ref_mag=14.27 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.0389 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.77 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:35:49.84 -13:10:55.2: ref_mag=13.77 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.0332 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:50:51.40 -11:59:23.0: 13.96 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:37:28.71 -06:03:26.7: 14.42 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:50:51.40 -11:59:23.0: 13.86 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.90 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:50:51.40 -11:59:23.0: ref_mag=13.90 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.1356 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:37:28.71 -06:03:26.7: 14.62 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.49 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:37:28.71 -06:03:26.7: ref_mag=14.49 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.2846 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:35:15.50 -07:23:42.9: 14.22 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:35:15.50 -07:23:42.9: 13.84 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.97 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:35:15.50 -07:23:42.9: ref_mag=13.97 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.3205 delta=-0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:35:18.85 -07:05:00.9: 14.75 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:42:53.09 -06:49:07.1: 14.60 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:34:43.80 -10:53:24.6: 14.13 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:17:22.04 -10:51:01.6: 14.85 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:35:18.85 -07:05:00.9: 15.37 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.89 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:35:18.85 -07:05:00.9: ref_mag=14.89 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.4638 delta=0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:42:53.09 -06:49:07.1: 14.72 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.65 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:42:53.09 -06:49:07.1: ref_mag=14.65 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.4244 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:34:43.80 -10:53:24.6: 14.09 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:17:22.04 -10:51:01.6: 14.85 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:21:59.33 -13:38:49.7: 15.36 +/- 0.29 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.11 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:34:43.80 -10:53:24.6: ref_mag=14.11 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.3426 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.85 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:17:22.04 -10:51:01.6: ref_mag=14.85 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.3472 delta=0.50 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:22:38.63 -07:23:41.6: 14.85 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:21:59.33 -13:38:49.7: 15.12 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.22 +/- 0.19
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:21:59.33 -13:38:49.7: ref_mag=15.22 +/- 0.19 new_mean_mag=14.4461 delta=0.78 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:44:46.78 -13:28:39.4: 14.88 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:22:38.63 -07:23:41.6: 14.81 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.83 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:22:38.63 -07:23:41.6: ref_mag=14.83 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.5195 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:39:36.14 -11:58:11.6: 14.41 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:48:35.08 -07:06:42.2: 14.55 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:42:00.02 -06:28:33.2: 14.68 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:44:46.78 -13:28:39.4: 14.91 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.89 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:44:46.78 -13:28:39.4: ref_mag=14.89 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.6157 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:39:36.14 -11:58:11.6: 14.72 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:48:35.08 -07:06:42.2: 14.37 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.51 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:39:36.14 -11:58:11.6: ref_mag=14.51 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.4883 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.45 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:42:00.02 -06:28:33.2: 15.09 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:48:35.08 -07:06:42.2: ref_mag=14.45 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.5056 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.82 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:42:00.02 -06:28:33.2: ref_mag=14.82 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.6628 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:48:17.51 -09:01:03.8: 14.97 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:31:57.86 -05:57:35.0: 14.72 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:50:45.44 -08:14:51.1: 14.78 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:48:17.51 -09:01:03.8: 14.35 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.50 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:48:17.51 -09:01:03.8: ref_mag=14.50 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.4259 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:51:25.01 -09:07:23.9: 15.12 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:31:57.86 -05:57:35.0: 15.11 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.84 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:31:57.86 -05:57:35.0: ref_mag=14.84 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.5982 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:50:45.44 -08:14:51.1: 14.68 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.72 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:50:45.44 -08:14:51.1: ref_mag=14.72 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.6013 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:24:25.15 -09:59:54.1: 14.53 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:51:25.01 -09:07:23.9: 15.05 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.08 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:51:25.01 -09:07:23.9: ref_mag=15.08 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.6672 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:48:52.30 -13:01:14.3: 14.58 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:24:25.15 -09:59:54.1: 14.73 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.60 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:24:25.15 -09:59:54.1: ref_mag=14.60 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.5194 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:30:00.09 -07:04:06.9: 14.53 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:18:43.75 -12:09:31.4: 15.25 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:44:47.18 -07:24:03.4: 14.77 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:48:52.30 -13:01:14.3: 14.65 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.61 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:48:52.30 -13:01:14.3: ref_mag=14.61 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.5787 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:30:00.09 -07:04:06.9: 14.40 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:40:52.99 -05:47:31.9: 15.40 +/- 0.29 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.47 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:30:00.09 -07:04:06.9: ref_mag=14.47 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.4953 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:44:21.18 -06:32:38.5: 14.68 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:18:43.75 -12:09:31.4: 15.56 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.25 +/- 0.25
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:18:43.75 -12:09:31.4: ref_mag=15.25 +/- 0.25 new_mean_mag=14.4919 delta=0.76 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:44:47.18 -07:24:03.4: 15.07 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:37:18.99 -07:13:03.0: 15.28 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.88 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:44:47.18 -07:24:03.4: ref_mag=14.88 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.6618 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:40:52.99 -05:47:31.9: 14.93 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.08 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:40:52.99 -05:47:31.9: ref_mag=15.08 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.7199 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:44:21.18 -06:32:38.5: 14.88 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.76 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:44:21.18 -06:32:38.5: ref_mag=14.76 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.6422 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:29:37.36 -12:25:37.3: 14.88 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:37:18.99 -07:13:03.0: 15.66 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.28 +/- 0.24
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:37:18.99 -07:13:03.0: ref_mag=15.28 +/- 0.24 new_mean_mag=14.7159 delta=0.56 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:21:38.82 -10:06:23.0: 14.86 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:28:54.33 -13:59:03.8: 15.15 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:29:37.36 -12:25:37.3: 15.02 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.93 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:29:37.36 -12:25:37.3: ref_mag=14.93 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.6495 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:30:09.05 -06:50:02.6: 14.94 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:19:10.65 -07:55:19.9: 14.87 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:30:21.28 -09:20:38.6: 15.04 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:28:54.33 -13:59:03.8: 15.08 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.12 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:21:38.82 -10:06:23.0: 14.99 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:28:54.33 -13:59:03.8: ref_mag=15.12 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=14.6359 delta=0.48 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.91 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:21:38.82 -10:06:23.0: ref_mag=14.91 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.5121 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:26:34.22 -10:42:38.4: 15.49 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:25:37.47 -06:40:10.3: 14.88 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:30:09.05 -06:50:02.6: 15.09 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.99 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:30:09.05 -06:50:02.6: ref_mag=14.99 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.7424 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:19:10.65 -07:55:19.9: 14.79 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.83 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:19:10.65 -07:55:19.9: ref_mag=14.83 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.5002 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:30:21.28 -09:20:38.6: 15.05 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.04 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:30:21.28 -09:20:38.6: ref_mag=15.04 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.5059 delta=0.54 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:26:34.22 -10:42:38.4: 15.11 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:26:49.33 -08:35:51.4: 15.12 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.25 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:26:34.22 -10:42:38.4: ref_mag=15.25 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=14.7675 delta=0.49 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:25:37.47 -06:40:10.3: 15.09 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.95 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:25:37.47 -06:40:10.3: ref_mag=14.95 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.6874 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:26:49.33 -08:35:51.4: 14.83 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.95 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:26:49.33 -08:35:51.4: ref_mag=14.95 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.6334 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53460.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out55021.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out56449.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 9s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52182_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225
The candidate 52182_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52184_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225
The candidate 52184_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:26:33.05 -07:00:16.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52185_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225
The candidate 52185_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52194_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225
The candidate 52194_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:29:27.78 -12:05:22.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52817_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225
The candidate 52817_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:39:31.11 -13:29:57.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53335_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225
The candidate 53335_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53460_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225
Preparing report for the candidate 53460_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53881_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225
The candidate 53881_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53927_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225
The candidate 53927_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53986_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225
The candidate 53986_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54492_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225
The candidate 54492_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:32:21.97 -14:10:32.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54552_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225
The candidate 54552_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55021_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225
Preparing report for the candidate 55021_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55092_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225
The candidate 55092_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55738_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225
The candidate 55738_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55935_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225
The candidate 55935_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56004_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225
The candidate 56004_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:22:36.63 -07:47:37.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56449_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225
Preparing report for the candidate 56449_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56676_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225
The candidate 56676_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56720_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225
The candidate 56720_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56722_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225
The candidate 56722_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:35:14.53 -07:22:08.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56753_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225
The candidate 56753_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:18:29.28 -09:25:10.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56892_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225
The candidate 56892_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56894_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225
The candidate 56894_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57263_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225
The candidate 57263_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57322_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225
The candidate 57322_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57335_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225
The candidate 57335_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57597_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225
The candidate 57597_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57867_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225
The candidate 57867_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57950_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225
The candidate 57950_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57998_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225
The candidate 57998_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58007_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225
The candidate 58007_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58066_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225
The candidate 58066_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58123_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225
The candidate 58123_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58157_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225
The candidate 58157_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:32:59.84 -10:56:02.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58163_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225
The candidate 58163_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58179_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225
The candidate 58179_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58183_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225
The candidate 58183_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58237_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225
The candidate 58237_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58254_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225
The candidate 58254_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58355_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225
The candidate 58355_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58447_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225
The candidate 58447_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58492_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225
The candidate 58492_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58513_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225
The candidate 58513_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58563_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225
The candidate 58563_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58778_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225
The candidate 58778_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:29:40.56 -05:57:11.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58830_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225
The candidate 58830_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:18:10.87 -09:47:22.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58849_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225
The candidate 58849_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:21:08.53 -12:36:58.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59036_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225
The candidate 59036_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59164_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225
The candidate 59164_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59281_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225
The candidate 59281_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59322_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225
The candidate 59322_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59453_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225
The candidate 59453_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59498_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225
The candidate 59498_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59520_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225
The candidate 59520_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59558_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225
The candidate 59558_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59663_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225
The candidate 59663_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59753_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225
The candidate 59753_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59864_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225
The candidate 59864_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59868_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225
The candidate 59868_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 60001_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225
The candidate 60001_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:28:12.90 -06:21:25.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 60012_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225
The candidate 60012_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 60023_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225
The candidate 60023_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 60067_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225
The candidate 60067_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 60111_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225
The candidate 60111_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 60148_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225
The candidate 60148_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 60152_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225
The candidate 60152_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 60167_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225
The candidate 60167_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 60175_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225
The candidate 60175_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 60199_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225
The candidate 60199_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 60226_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225
The candidate 60226_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 60242_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225
The candidate 60242_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 60244_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225
The candidate 60244_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 60263_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225
The candidate 60263_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 60304_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225
The candidate 60304_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 60311_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225
The candidate 60311_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 60313_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225
The candidate 60313_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 60317_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225
The candidate 60317_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:37:13.80 -13:30:29.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 60364_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225
The candidate 60364_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 60368_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225
The candidate 60368_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 60397_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225
The candidate 60397_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 60423_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225
The candidate 60423_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 60443_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225
The candidate 60443_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 60454_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225
The candidate 60454_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 60458_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225
The candidate 60458_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 60474_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225
The candidate 60474_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 60482_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225
The candidate 60482_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 60490_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225
The candidate 60490_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 60611_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225
The candidate 60611_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:34:13.39 -14:02:20.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 60638_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225
The candidate 60638_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 60665_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225
The candidate 60665_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 60669_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225
The candidate 60669_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 60675_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225
The candidate 60675_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 60714_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225
The candidate 60714_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 60772_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225
The candidate 60772_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 60798_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225
The candidate 60798_fd_Lib-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_01-58-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0225 did not pass the final checks