This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_005002_TTUQ2b1x1_3283161_imsrzB7m
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 09.2276 2461169.7276 13.60 16:32:43.31 -27:41:21.9
351.47363 13.68046 galactic Sco Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.8" and 2.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.556 Phyllis 3 1 3 13.4 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits at 16:32:43.31 -27:41:21.9: 15.06 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits at 16:32:43.31 -27:41:21.9: 14.75 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461169.7276,13.60,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260509.2276 13.60CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 09.2276 2461169.7276 13.83 15:54:07.15 -21:45:41.7
349.63958 24.11295 galactic Sco Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.2" and 2.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.229 Adelinda 0 1 1 14.3 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits at 15:54:07.15 -21:45:41.7: 15.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits at 15:54:07.15 -21:45:41.7: 14.76 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461169.7276,13.83,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260509.2276 13.83CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 09.2276 2461169.7276 13.68 16:33:22.26 -26:37:48.9
352.39521 14.26604 galactic Sco Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.8" and 2.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.254 Augusta 2 -1 2 13.9 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits at 16:33:22.26 -26:37:48.9: 15.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits at 16:33:22.26 -26:37:48.9: 14.81 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461169.7276,13.68,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260509.2276 13.68CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 09.2276 2461169.7276 13.88 16:04:39.86 -26:52:47.6
347.63786 18.77494 galactic Sco Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 2.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.678 Fredegundis 1 -0 1 13.9 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits at 16:04:39.86 -26:52:47.6: 15.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits at 16:04:39.86 -26:52:47.6: 14.77 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461169.7276,13.88,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260509.2276 13.88CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461139.81765986 09.04.2026 07:37:15.812 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits
First image: 2461139.81765986 09.04.2026 07:37:15.812 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits
Last image: 2461169.72785394 09.05.2026 05:27:56.580 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_005002_TTUQ2b1x1_3283161_imsrzB7m/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 17
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.38
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 4358
Objects passed selection criteria: 4357
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 4087.25
Average stars matched: 4001 (97.8898 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 110952 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed May 6 12:14:36 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-43-g0c21e0c3
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat May 9 00:53:26 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461139.81765986 09.04.2026 07:37:15.812 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits
First image: 2461139.81765986 09.04.2026 07:37:15.812 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits
Last image: 2461169.72785394 09.05.2026 05:27:56.580 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_005002_TTUQ2b1x1_3283161_imsrzB7m/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 125
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.99
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 22 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 45784
Objects passed selection criteria: 45708
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 43195.5
Average stars matched: 42009.2 (97.2538 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 150364 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed May 6 12:14:36 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-43-g0c21e0c3
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat May 9 00:55:33 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_005002_TTUQ2b1x1_3283161_imsrzB7m/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-12_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0137.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_005002_TTUQ2b1x1_3283161_imsrzB7m/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_005002_TTUQ2b1x1_3283161_imsrzB7m/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-12_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0137.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_005002_TTUQ2b1x1_3283161_imsrzB7m/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461169.72734375
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits'
wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits'
wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-12_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0137.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-12_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0137.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-12_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0137.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-12_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0137.fits'
wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits
Image size: 941.9'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:19:12.320 -25:59:25.30 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-12_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0137.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-12_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0137.fits
util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Image size: 938.1'x624.7' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:19:12.806 -25:59:57.52 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:19:12.320 -25:59:25.30
Second-epoch image center 16:19:12.806 -25:59:57.52
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0091 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
Image size: 938.1'x624.7' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:19:12.615 -25:59:42.23 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:19:12.320 -25:59:25.30
Second-epoch image center 16:19:12.615 -25:59:42.23
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0048 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 16:19:12.806 -25:59:57.52
Second-epoch second image center 16:19:12.615 -25:59:42.23
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00431 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits &> /tmp/tmp.KVpNfuHxKL
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ok5cZrRjiA
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_005002_TTUQ2b1x1_3283161_imsrzB7m/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-12_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0137.fits &> /tmp/tmp.rHE75LOoiU
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_005002_TTUQ2b1x1_3283161_imsrzB7m/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-12_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0137.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_005002_TTUQ2b1x1_3283161_imsrzB7m/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits &> /tmp/tmp.KFLfuHStHd
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_005002_TTUQ2b1x1_3283161_imsrzB7m/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits and wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits and wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits and wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 6377 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 235.3884 to 253.5840 deg, Dec -31.5113 to -20.0797 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 235.3884 to 253.5840 deg, Dec -31.5113 to -20.0797 deg
Loaded 8583 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4654 out of 4825 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4825 out of 6377 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.627400
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.627400
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.38
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.25
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.25
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 6377 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 235.3884 to 253.5840 deg, Dec -31.5113 to -20.0797 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 235.3884 to 253.5840 deg, Dec -31.5113 to -20.0797 deg
Loaded 8583 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4654 out of 4825 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4825 out of 6377 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits (aperture=6.1)
Read 5296 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 235.4154 to 253.5845 deg, Dec -31.5353 to -20.0794 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 235.4154 to 253.5845 deg, Dec -31.5353 to -20.0794 deg
Loaded 8596 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4065 out of 4156 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4156 out of 5296 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits (aperture=6.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 15 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits
2.2 pix Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
2.4 pix fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-12_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0137.fits
2.4 pix fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.2 mag. Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits
14.0 mag. Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
13.9 mag. fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-12_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0137.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.9 (SNR ) 11.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.KVpNfuHxKL (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-09_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_005002_TTUQ2b1x1_3283161_imsrzB7m/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits' -> 'wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=576, passed=6377
Got 6377 stars (including 5785 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6377 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013082 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010466 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 939 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6230 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6232 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6231 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 961 stars left (next iteration limit 1057)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits -region wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ok5cZrRjiA (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-09_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_005002_TTUQ2b1x1_3283161_imsrzB7m/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits' -> 'wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=393, passed=5296
Got 5296 stars (including 4896 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5296 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013083 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010467 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 941 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5185 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5187 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5186 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 963 stars left (next iteration limit 1059)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits -region wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.rHE75LOoiU (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-09_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_005002_TTUQ2b1x1_3283161_imsrzB7m/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_005002_TTUQ2b1x1_3283161_imsrzB7m/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-12_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0137.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_005002_TTUQ2b1x1_3283161_imsrzB7m/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-12_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0137.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_005002_TTUQ2b1x1_3283161_imsrzB7m/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-12_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0137.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_005002_TTUQ2b1x1_3283161_imsrzB7m/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-12_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0137.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_005002_TTUQ2b1x1_3283161_imsrzB7m/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-12_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0137.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_005002_TTUQ2b1x1_3283161_imsrzB7m/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-12_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0137.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-12_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0137.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-12_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0137.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-12_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0137.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-12_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0137.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-12_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0137.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-12_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0137.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-12_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0137.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_005002_TTUQ2b1x1_3283161_imsrzB7m/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-12_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0137.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-12_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0137.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=385, passed=5289
Got 5289 stars (including 4898 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-12_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0137.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5289 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013029 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010423 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 348 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 936 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5157 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 348 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5156 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5156 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.63"
Excluding outliers - 960 stars left (next iteration limit 1056)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-12_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0137.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-12_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0137.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_005002_TTUQ2b1x1_3283161_imsrzB7m/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-12_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0137.fits -region wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-12_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0137.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-12_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0137.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.KFLfuHStHd (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-09_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_005002_TTUQ2b1x1_3283161_imsrzB7m/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_005002_TTUQ2b1x1_3283161_imsrzB7m/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_005002_TTUQ2b1x1_3283161_imsrzB7m/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_005002_TTUQ2b1x1_3283161_imsrzB7m/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_005002_TTUQ2b1x1_3283161_imsrzB7m/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_005002_TTUQ2b1x1_3283161_imsrzB7m/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_005002_TTUQ2b1x1_3283161_imsrzB7m/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_005002_TTUQ2b1x1_3283161_imsrzB7m/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=372, passed=5423
Got 5423 stars (including 5043 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5423 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013029 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010423 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 348 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 934 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5280 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 348 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5279 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5278 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.63"
Excluding outliers - 960 stars left (next iteration limit 1056)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_005002_TTUQ2b1x1_3283161_imsrzB7m/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits -region wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-12_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0137.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-12_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0137.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_005002_TTUQ2b1x1_3283161_imsrzB7m/wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-12_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0137.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_005002_TTUQ2b1x1_3283161_imsrzB7m/wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sco-02-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits at 16:20:44.08 -29:59:42.2: 11.40 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits at 16:26:10.21 -26:42:48.6: 11.33 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits at 16:22:35.07 -26:59:20.6: 11.33 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits at 16:07:37.99 -29:58:46.8: 11.19 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits at 16:20:44.08 -29:59:42.2: 11.53 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits at 16:07:37.99 -29:58:46.8: 11.30 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits at 16:22:35.07 -26:59:20.6: 11.31 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits at 16:26:10.21 -26:42:48.6: 11.37 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.32 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.23 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.45 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:22:35.07 -26:59:20.6: ref_mag=11.32 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.2967 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.35 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:07:37.99 -29:58:46.8: ref_mag=11.23 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.2723 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:20:44.08 -29:59:42.2: ref_mag=11.45 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.3612 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:26:10.21 -26:42:48.6: ref_mag=11.35 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.2825 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20160_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138
The candidate 20160_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:10:46.61 -23:03:57.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20167_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138
The candidate 20167_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:02:42.67 -26:54:37.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20170_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138
The candidate 20170_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:09:51.68 -25:08:41.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20210_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138
The candidate 20210_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:22:05.80 -26:43:47.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20230_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138
The candidate 20230_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20235_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138
The candidate 20235_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:19:35.45 -26:29:01.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20238_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138
The candidate 20238_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20241_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138
The candidate 20241_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20242_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138
The candidate 20242_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20243_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138
The candidate 20243_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:17:39.21 -22:56:40.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20250_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138
The candidate 20250_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:11:30.47 -28:36:23.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20265_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138
The candidate 20265_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:24:20.62 -29:14:40.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 02298_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138
The candidate 02298_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:38:12.97 -28:34:10.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20020_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138
The candidate 20020_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:17:40.34 -22:53:35.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04777_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138
The candidate 04777_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:04:36.20 -24:06:02.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Sco-02-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_005002_TTUQ2b1x1_3283161_imsrzB7m/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-12_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0137.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_005002_TTUQ2b1x1_3283161_imsrzB7m/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_005002_TTUQ2b1x1_3283161_imsrzB7m/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-12_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0137.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_005002_TTUQ2b1x1_3283161_imsrzB7m/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-12_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0137.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-12_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0137.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits
Image size: 941.9'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:19:12.320 -25:59:25.30 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-12_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0137.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-12_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0137.fits
Image size: 938.1'x624.7' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:19:12.806 -25:59:57.52 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:19:12.320 -25:59:25.30
Second-epoch image center 16:19:12.806 -25:59:57.52
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0091 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
Image size: 938.1'x624.7' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:19:12.615 -25:59:42.23 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:19:12.320 -25:59:25.30
Second-epoch image center 16:19:12.615 -25:59:42.23
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0048 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 16:19:12.806 -25:59:57.52
Second-epoch second image center 16:19:12.615 -25:59:42.23
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00431 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits &> /tmp/tmp.YTKUFo7iy3
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits &> /tmp/tmp.kFEsFDLq33
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_005002_TTUQ2b1x1_3283161_imsrzB7m/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-12_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0137.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ZQ6rAUQdut
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_005002_TTUQ2b1x1_3283161_imsrzB7m/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-12_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0137.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_005002_TTUQ2b1x1_3283161_imsrzB7m/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits &> /tmp/tmp.nereTV7Tc6
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_005002_TTUQ2b1x1_3283161_imsrzB7m/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits and wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits and wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits and wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 70432 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 235.3318 to 253.5851 deg, Dec -31.5213 to -20.0064 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 235.3318 to 253.5851 deg, Dec -31.5213 to -20.0064 deg
Loaded 8671 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6325 out of 7000 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7000 out of 70432 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.413100
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.413100
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.99
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.42
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.42
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 70432 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 235.3318 to 253.5851 deg, Dec -31.5213 to -20.0064 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 235.3318 to 253.5851 deg, Dec -31.5213 to -20.0064 deg
Loaded 8671 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6325 out of 7000 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7000 out of 70432 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits (aperture=4.3)
Read 56523 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 235.3388 to 253.5858 deg, Dec -31.5513 to -20.0429 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 235.3388 to 253.5858 deg, Dec -31.5513 to -20.0429 deg
Loaded 8686 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6533 out of 7007 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7007 out of 56523 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits (aperture=4.4)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 89 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits
2.1 pix Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
2.2 pix fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-12_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0137.fits
2.3 pix fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
2.0 pix wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.4 mag. Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits
14.2 mag. Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-12_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0137.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.1 (SNR ) 13.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.YTKUFo7iy3 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-09_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_005002_TTUQ2b1x1_3283161_imsrzB7m/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits' -> 'wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=3556, passed=70421
Got 70421 stars (including 66735 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 70421 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013082 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010466 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 943 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 68366 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 68366 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 68364 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 968 stars left (next iteration limit 1064)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits -region wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.kFEsFDLq33 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-09_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_005002_TTUQ2b1x1_3283161_imsrzB7m/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits' -> 'wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=2201, passed=56519
Got 56519 stars (including 54206 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 56519 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013083 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010467 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.6 to -20.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 950 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 55146 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.6 to -20.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 55149 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 55148 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 967 stars left (next iteration limit 1063)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits -region wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ZQ6rAUQdut (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-09_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_005002_TTUQ2b1x1_3283161_imsrzB7m/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_005002_TTUQ2b1x1_3283161_imsrzB7m/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-12_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0137.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_005002_TTUQ2b1x1_3283161_imsrzB7m/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-12_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0137.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_005002_TTUQ2b1x1_3283161_imsrzB7m/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-12_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0137.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_005002_TTUQ2b1x1_3283161_imsrzB7m/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-12_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0137.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_005002_TTUQ2b1x1_3283161_imsrzB7m/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-12_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0137.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_005002_TTUQ2b1x1_3283161_imsrzB7m/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-12_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0137.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-12_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0137.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-12_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0137.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-12_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0137.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-12_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0137.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-12_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0137.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-12_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0137.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-12_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0137.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_005002_TTUQ2b1x1_3283161_imsrzB7m/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-12_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0137.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-12_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0137.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=2280, passed=52100
Got 52100 stars (including 49745 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-12_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0137.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 52100 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013029 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010423 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 936 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 50472 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 50471 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 50471 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
Excluding outliers - 965 stars left (next iteration limit 1061)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-12_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0137.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-12_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0137.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_005002_TTUQ2b1x1_3283161_imsrzB7m/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-12_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0137.fits -region wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-12_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0137.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-12_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0137.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.nereTV7Tc6 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-09_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_005002_TTUQ2b1x1_3283161_imsrzB7m/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_005002_TTUQ2b1x1_3283161_imsrzB7m/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_005002_TTUQ2b1x1_3283161_imsrzB7m/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_005002_TTUQ2b1x1_3283161_imsrzB7m/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_005002_TTUQ2b1x1_3283161_imsrzB7m/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_005002_TTUQ2b1x1_3283161_imsrzB7m/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_005002_TTUQ2b1x1_3283161_imsrzB7m/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_005002_TTUQ2b1x1_3283161_imsrzB7m/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=2, blended=2269, passed=51765
Got 51765 stars (including 49420 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 51765 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013029 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010423 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 939 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 50026 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 50023 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 50022 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Excluding outliers - 968 stars left (next iteration limit 1064)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_005002_TTUQ2b1x1_3283161_imsrzB7m/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits -region wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-12_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0137.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_005002_TTUQ2b1x1_3283161_imsrzB7m/wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-12_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0137.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_005002_TTUQ2b1x1_3283161_imsrzB7m/wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sco-02-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits at 15:52:03.91 -22:17:34.8: 12.40 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits at 15:54:08.89 -29:27:10.0: 12.43 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits at 16:16:26.85 -22:58:32.9: 13.79 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits at 15:59:21.45 -28:04:43.8: 11.34 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits at 16:22:22.70 -29:29:26.4: 13.78 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits at 16:19:26.55 -28:20:51.4: 13.15 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits at 15:59:21.45 -28:04:43.8: 11.26 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits at 15:52:03.91 -22:17:34.8: 12.35 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.30 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:59:21.45 -28:04:43.8: ref_mag=11.30 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.6448 delta=-1.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.38 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:52:03.91 -22:17:34.8: ref_mag=12.38 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.6553 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits at 16:19:26.55 -28:20:51.4: 13.01 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits at 16:22:22.70 -29:29:26.4: 13.92 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.08 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:19:26.55 -28:20:51.4: ref_mag=13.08 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.2404 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits at 15:54:08.89 -29:27:10.0: 12.32 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits at 16:16:26.85 -22:58:32.9: 13.76 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.38 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.83 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:54:08.89 -29:27:10.0: ref_mag=12.38 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.4951 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:22:22.70 -29:29:26.4: ref_mag=13.83 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.7662 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.78 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:16:26.85 -22:58:32.9: ref_mag=13.78 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.8316 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits at 15:57:14.18 -27:47:58.8: 11.45 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits at 15:57:14.18 -27:47:58.8: 11.51 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.47 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:57:14.18 -27:47:58.8: ref_mag=11.47 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.5276 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits at 16:10:23.66 -26:17:46.1: 13.06 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits at 16:23:31.29 -26:35:34.6: 14.22 +/- 0.32 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits at 15:55:38.35 -29:15:40.4: 14.47 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits at 16:10:23.66 -26:17:46.1: 13.01 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.04 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:10:23.66 -26:17:46.1: ref_mag=13.04 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.1118 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits at 16:23:31.29 -26:35:34.6: 14.25 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits at 16:26:41.18 -22:00:09.3: 14.49 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.22 +/- 0.32
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 16:23:31.29 -26:35:34.6: ref_mag=14.22 +/- 0.32 new_mean_mag=13.2120 delta=1.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits at 15:55:38.35 -29:15:40.4: 13.94 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.14 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits at 15:55:14.10 -29:02:52.3: 14.03 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:55:38.35 -29:15:40.4: ref_mag=14.14 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=13.2479 delta=0.89 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits at 16:26:41.18 -22:00:09.3: 14.29 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.39 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits at 16:31:12.69 -26:34:26.4: 13.83 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:26:41.18 -22:00:09.3: ref_mag=14.39 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=13.6214 delta=0.77 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits at 16:10:14.00 -25:56:54.9: 13.78 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits at 15:55:14.10 -29:02:52.3: 13.91 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.98 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:55:14.10 -29:02:52.3: ref_mag=13.98 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.5747 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits at 15:49:54.85 -27:42:30.9: 13.89 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits at 16:00:58.63 -29:49:53.4: 14.23 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits at 16:10:14.00 -25:56:54.9: 13.84 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits at 16:35:47.72 -27:39:24.3: 14.26 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.80 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:10:14.00 -25:56:54.9: ref_mag=13.80 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.6031 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits at 16:31:12.69 -26:34:26.4: 13.94 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.87 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:31:12.69 -26:34:26.4: ref_mag=13.87 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.6712 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits at 16:32:43.31 -27:41:21.9: 15.06 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits at 15:49:54.85 -27:42:30.9: 14.13 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits at 16:00:58.63 -29:49:53.4: 14.28 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.96 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.25 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:49:54.85 -27:42:30.9: ref_mag=13.96 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.5796 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:00:58.63 -29:49:53.4: ref_mag=14.25 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=13.5921 delta=0.66 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits at 16:35:47.72 -27:39:24.3: 14.29 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.27 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:35:47.72 -27:39:24.3: ref_mag=14.27 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=13.8170 delta=0.46 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits at 16:32:43.31 -27:41:21.9: 14.75 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits at 15:54:07.15 -21:45:41.7: 15.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits at 16:36:43.23 -26:07:18.3: 13.87 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits at 16:07:08.65 -24:39:12.7: 13.87 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits at 15:54:07.15 -21:45:41.7: 14.76 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits at 15:59:56.82 -28:43:52.0: 13.91 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits at 15:58:42.65 -29:30:59.6: 14.11 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits at 16:07:08.65 -24:39:12.7: 13.86 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.86 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:07:08.65 -24:39:12.7: ref_mag=13.86 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.7166 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits at 15:55:45.45 -22:14:20.6: 14.26 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits at 16:36:43.23 -26:07:18.3: 13.94 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.90 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:36:43.23 -26:07:18.3: ref_mag=13.90 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.7660 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits at 16:29:36.13 -26:35:15.2: 13.93 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits at 15:59:56.82 -28:43:52.0: 14.13 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.97 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:59:56.82 -28:43:52.0: ref_mag=13.97 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.7663 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits at 15:58:42.65 -29:30:59.6: 13.77 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.92 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:58:42.65 -29:30:59.6: ref_mag=13.92 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.6480 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits at 15:55:45.45 -22:14:20.6: 13.77 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.96 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:55:45.45 -22:14:20.6: ref_mag=13.96 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.8570 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits at 16:29:36.13 -26:35:15.2: 13.88 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.90 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:29:36.13 -26:35:15.2: ref_mag=13.90 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.9266 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits at 16:10:17.05 -26:22:54.1: 13.88 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits at 16:08:29.21 -22:32:30.6: 14.58 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits at 16:33:22.26 -26:37:48.9: 15.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits at 15:50:46.45 -29:05:00.9: 14.07 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits at 15:58:16.51 -29:07:18.6: 14.21 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits at 16:10:17.05 -26:22:54.1: 13.74 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits at 16:07:25.94 -26:04:05.3: 14.05 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.81 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:10:17.05 -26:22:54.1: ref_mag=13.81 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.8092 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits at 16:08:29.21 -22:32:30.6: 14.09 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits at 16:36:14.92 -24:38:19.6: 14.54 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.28 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:08:29.21 -22:32:30.6: ref_mag=14.28 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.9071 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits at 16:33:22.26 -26:37:48.9: 14.81 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits at 15:50:46.45 -29:05:00.9: 14.06 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits at 16:36:52.32 -25:41:31.1: 14.39 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.06 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:50:46.45 -29:05:00.9: ref_mag=14.06 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.7215 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits at 15:58:16.51 -29:07:18.6: 14.01 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.11 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:58:16.51 -29:07:18.6: ref_mag=14.11 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=13.7516 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits at 16:07:25.94 -26:04:05.3: 14.14 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.08 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:07:25.94 -26:04:05.3: ref_mag=14.08 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.8308 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits at 16:36:14.92 -24:38:19.6: 14.10 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.27 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:36:14.92 -24:38:19.6: ref_mag=14.27 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.9554 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits at 16:11:19.46 -28:27:50.5: 14.09 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits at 16:36:52.32 -25:41:31.1: 13.98 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.16 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:36:52.32 -25:41:31.1: ref_mag=14.16 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.9410 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits at 15:51:10.52 -24:54:07.3: 13.76 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits at 15:49:13.14 -26:29:08.2: 14.22 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits at 16:11:19.46 -28:27:50.5: 13.88 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.99 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:11:19.46 -28:27:50.5: ref_mag=13.99 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.8760 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits at 15:55:03.30 -28:36:57.2: 14.07 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits at 16:16:18.17 -25:06:17.8: 14.22 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits at 15:51:10.52 -24:54:07.3: 13.96 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.83 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:51:10.52 -24:54:07.3: ref_mag=13.83 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.9378 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits at 16:04:47.81 -28:32:59.7: 14.34 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits at 16:10:45.88 -23:23:26.6: 14.25 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits at 15:49:13.14 -26:29:08.2: 14.02 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.12 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:49:13.14 -26:29:08.2: ref_mag=14.12 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.8614 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits at 15:55:03.30 -28:36:57.2: 14.00 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.04 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:55:03.30 -28:36:57.2: ref_mag=14.04 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.7443 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits at 16:16:18.17 -25:06:17.8: 14.36 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.27 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:16:18.17 -25:06:17.8: ref_mag=14.27 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.0063 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits at 16:10:45.88 -23:23:26.6: 14.40 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits at 16:36:15.61 -23:33:33.9: 14.74 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits at 16:04:47.81 -28:32:59.7: 14.02 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.30 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:10:45.88 -23:23:26.6: ref_mag=14.30 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.8981 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.16 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:04:47.81 -28:32:59.7: ref_mag=14.16 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.9662 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits at 16:19:52.11 -23:03:26.1: 14.31 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits at 16:36:15.61 -23:33:33.9: 14.53 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.64 +/- 0.18
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:36:15.61 -23:33:33.9: ref_mag=14.64 +/- 0.18 new_mean_mag=14.0808 delta=0.56 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits at 16:30:40.92 -23:25:06.7: 14.46 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits at 16:36:37.49 -26:19:56.8: 14.32 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits at 16:13:34.29 -28:47:07.1: 13.67 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits at 16:19:52.11 -23:03:26.1: 14.07 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.20 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:19:52.11 -23:03:26.1: ref_mag=14.20 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.0796 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits at 16:12:08.14 -22:48:58.9: 14.21 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits at 16:36:37.49 -26:19:56.8: 14.49 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits at 16:30:40.92 -23:25:06.7: 14.10 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.38 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:36:37.49 -26:19:56.8: ref_mag=14.38 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=13.9489 delta=0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.26 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:30:40.92 -23:25:06.7: ref_mag=14.26 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.0735 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits at 16:07:15.98 -29:48:09.4: 13.67 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits at 16:13:34.29 -28:47:07.1: 14.02 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.75 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:13:34.29 -28:47:07.1: ref_mag=13.75 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.9278 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits at 16:12:08.14 -22:48:58.9: 14.28 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.24 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:12:08.14 -22:48:58.9: ref_mag=14.24 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.9937 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits at 16:07:15.98 -29:48:09.4: 13.85 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.73 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:07:15.98 -29:48:09.4: ref_mag=13.73 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.6125 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits at 16:04:39.86 -26:52:47.6: 15.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits at 16:34:59.36 -28:38:37.3: 14.00 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits at 15:57:44.93 -26:51:48.2: 13.98 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits at 16:04:39.86 -26:52:47.6: 14.77 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits at 16:34:59.36 -28:38:37.3: 14.14 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.05 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:34:59.36 -28:38:37.3: ref_mag=14.05 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.9193 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits at 15:57:44.93 -26:51:48.2: 14.21 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.06 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:57:44.93 -26:51:48.2: ref_mag=14.06 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.0203 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out83259.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out83592.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out83632.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out83707.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out83921.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 14s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82331_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138
The candidate 82331_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82334_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138
The candidate 82334_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82351_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138
The candidate 82351_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82355_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138
The candidate 82355_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:27:13.92 -26:01:13.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82360_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138
The candidate 82360_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82361_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138
The candidate 82361_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82362_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138
The candidate 82362_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:11:24.32 -25:54:03.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82365_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138
The candidate 82365_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82369_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138
The candidate 82369_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:53:44.66 -25:50:59.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82551_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138
The candidate 82551_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82561_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138
The candidate 82561_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82605_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138
The candidate 82605_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82750_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138
The candidate 82750_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:23:26.42 -26:29:46.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82752_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138
The candidate 82752_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82776_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138
The candidate 82776_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:23:28.57 -26:29:52.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82872_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138
The candidate 82872_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82896_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138
The candidate 82896_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:07:52.12 -24:29:06.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83084_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138
The candidate 83084_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83110_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138
The candidate 83110_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83144_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138
The candidate 83144_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:37:25.62 -28:05:46.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83217_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138
The candidate 83217_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:16:59.07 -23:00:13.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83252_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138
The candidate 83252_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83259_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138
The candidate 83259_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:23:31.29 -26:35:34.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.21, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.19)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.541 6045463375930616832 245.88024963629 -26.59304466307 13.5088 12.7741 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.541#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83296_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138
The candidate 83296_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83348_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138
The candidate 83348_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83374_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138
The candidate 83374_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:11:41.25 -27:03:35.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83384_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138
The candidate 83384_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:31:18.54 -26:33:32.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83425_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138
The candidate 83425_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83435_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138
The candidate 83435_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:11:03.35 -25:39:32.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83447_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138
The candidate 83447_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:10:17.18 -30:14:10.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83497_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138
The candidate 83497_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83516_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138
The candidate 83516_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83522_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138
The candidate 83522_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83526_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138
The candidate 83526_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83592_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138
Preparing report for the candidate 83592_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83599_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138
The candidate 83599_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83605_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138
The candidate 83605_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83616_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138
The candidate 83616_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:33:54.48 -26:41:42.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83618_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138
The candidate 83618_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83632_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138
Preparing report for the candidate 83632_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83640_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138
The candidate 83640_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83644_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138
The candidate 83644_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83654_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138
The candidate 83654_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83662_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138
The candidate 83662_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:28:58.24 -26:21:40.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83669_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138
The candidate 83669_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83676_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138
The candidate 83676_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83682_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138
The candidate 83682_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:32:18.26 -22:11:59.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83684_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138
The candidate 83684_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:54:16.57 -28:46:02.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83687_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138
The candidate 83687_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83698_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138
The candidate 83698_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83707_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138
Preparing report for the candidate 83707_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83711_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138
The candidate 83711_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83714_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138
The candidate 83714_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83724_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138
The candidate 83724_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83729_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138
The candidate 83729_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83734_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138
The candidate 83734_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83744_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138
The candidate 83744_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83749_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138
The candidate 83749_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83762_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138
The candidate 83762_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83766_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138
The candidate 83766_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83767_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138
The candidate 83767_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83792_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138
The candidate 83792_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83814_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138
The candidate 83814_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83830_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138
The candidate 83830_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83836_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138
The candidate 83836_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83841_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138
The candidate 83841_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83848_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138
The candidate 83848_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83849_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138
The candidate 83849_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83861_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138
The candidate 83861_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83864_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138
The candidate 83864_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:58:19.98 -22:59:15.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83873_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138
The candidate 83873_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83890_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138
The candidate 83890_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83911_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138
The candidate 83911_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:07:27.93 -29:25:00.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83921_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138
Preparing report for the candidate 83921_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83952_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138
The candidate 83952_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83976_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138
The candidate 83976_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83990_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138
The candidate 83990_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:55:20.27 -27:08:53.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69019_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138
The candidate 69019_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:04:36.20 -24:06:02.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35045_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138
The candidate 35045_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:03:53.84 -26:48:36.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59244_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138
The candidate 59244_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:10:46.61 -23:03:57.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56554_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138
The candidate 56554_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:17:40.34 -22:53:35.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57096_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138
The candidate 57096_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:17:39.21 -22:56:41.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11922_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138
The candidate 11922_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:15:37.08 -29:50:44.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 24486_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138
The candidate 24486_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:38:12.97 -28:34:10.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67403_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138
The candidate 67403_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:59:24.01 -23:46:25.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64825_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138
The candidate 64825_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:07:08.55 -23:40:11.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81008_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138
The candidate 81008_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:00:18.47 -22:30:12.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81006_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138
The candidate 81006_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:05:30.92 -23:28:39.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33935_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138
The candidate 33935_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_00-27-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138 did not pass the final checks