This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_004734_TTUQ1b1x1_3083862_ogpuimXj
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 09.2387 2461169.7387 13.45 11:30:54.85 -08:47:48.4
271.62286 49.11758 galactic Crt Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.6" and 9.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.639 Latona 0 1 1 13.8 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 11:30:54.85 -08:47:48.4: 15.65 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 11:30:54.85 -08:47:48.4: 15.64 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461169.7387,13.45,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260509.2387 13.45CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 09.2387 2461169.7387 13.59 12:26:03.33 -09:29:29.1
292.52820 52.86684 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.5" and 9.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.509 Iolanda 2 1 2 13.7 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 12:26:03.33 -09:29:29.1: 15.58 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 12:26:03.33 -09:29:29.1: 15.61 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 09.2387* 12 26 03.33 -09 29 29.1 13.6 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461169.7387,13.59,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260509.2387 13.59CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 09.2387 2461169.7387 13.70 11:36:38.12 -08:16:56.3
273.20348 50.22168 galactic Crt Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 9.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.227 Philosophia -1 1 1 13.5 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 11:36:38.12 -08:16:56.3: 15.77 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 11:36:38.12 -08:16:56.3: 15.72 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461169.7387,13.70,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260509.2387 13.70CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 09.2387 2461169.7387 13.80 12:18:21.73 -12:03:09.9
290.29122 50.00545 galactic Crv Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.9" and 10.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.36 Atalante 1 -1 1 14.0 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 12:18:21.73 -12:03:09.9: 15.64 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 12:18:21.73 -12:03:09.9: 15.69 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461169.7387,13.80,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260509.2387 13.80CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 09.2387 2461169.7387 14.38 11:38:48.89 -05:01:31.1
271.58457 53.36808 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 9.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.193 Ambrosia -1 0 1 14.5 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 11:38:48.89 -05:01:31.1: 15.71 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 11:38:48.89 -05:01:31.1: 15.71 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 09.2387* 11 38 48.89 -05 01 31.1 14.4 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461169.7387,14.38,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260509.2387 14.38CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 09.2387 2461169.7387 14.51 11:37:49.97 -07:03:48.7
272.75816 51.44412 galactic Crt Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.6" and 9.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.624 Hektor -0 1 1 14.7 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 11:37:49.97 -07:03:48.7: 15.78 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 11:37:49.97 -07:03:48.7: 15.72 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461169.7387,14.51,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260509.2387 14.51CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461147.76570362 17.04.2026 06:22:26.793 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
First image: 2461147.76570362 17.04.2026 06:22:26.793 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
Last image: 2461169.74080634 09.05.2026 05:46:35.668 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_004734_TTUQ1b1x1_3083862_ogpuimXj/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-46-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 2
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.68
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 5281
Objects passed selection criteria: 5281
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.8 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.8 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 5126.25
Average stars matched: 5022.5 (97.9761 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 111280 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed May 6 12:14:36 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-43-g0c21e0c3
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat May 9 00:48:37 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461147.76570362 17.04.2026 06:22:26.793 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
First image: 2461147.76570362 17.04.2026 06:22:26.793 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
Last image: 2461169.74080634 09.05.2026 05:46:35.668 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_004734_TTUQ1b1x1_3083862_ogpuimXj/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-46-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 51
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.41
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 10 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 32741
Objects passed selection criteria: 32658
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 31389.2
Average stars matched: 30434.5 (96.9584 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 134592 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed May 6 12:14:36 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-43-g0c21e0c3
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat May 9 00:50:02 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_004734_TTUQ1b1x1_3083862_ogpuimXj/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-40-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0141.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_004734_TTUQ1b1x1_3083862_ogpuimXj/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-46-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_004734_TTUQ1b1x1_3083862_ogpuimXj/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-40-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0141.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_004734_TTUQ1b1x1_3083862_ogpuimXj/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-46-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461169.73665104
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits'
wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits'
wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-40-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0141.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-40-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0141.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-40-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0141.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-40-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0141.fits'
wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-46-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-46-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-46-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-46-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:00:03.184 -10:00:19.72 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-40-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0141.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-40-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0141.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:00:18.131 -10:02:14.09 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 12:00:03.184 -10:00:19.72
Second-epoch image center 12:00:18.131 -10:02:14.09
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0691 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-46-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-46-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits
util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Image size: 941.4'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:00:15.490 -10:01:30.82 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 12:00:03.184 -10:00:19.72
Second-epoch image center 12:00:15.490 -10:01:30.82
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0542 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 12:00:18.131 -10:02:14.09
Second-epoch second image center 12:00:15.490 -10:01:30.82
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01618 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits &> /tmp/tmp.CHUaDBmWnY
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits &> /tmp/tmp.EUvgAYqscY
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_004734_TTUQ1b1x1_3083862_ogpuimXj/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-40-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0141.fits &> /tmp/tmp.jA7RfvI2vA
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_004734_TTUQ1b1x1_3083862_ogpuimXj/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-40-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0141.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_004734_TTUQ1b1x1_3083862_ogpuimXj/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-46-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits &> /tmp/tmp.0WEnfS7EYm
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_004734_TTUQ1b1x1_3083862_ogpuimXj/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-46-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits and wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits and wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits and wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits) and catalog (wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 5414 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 171.6120 to 188.1907 deg, Dec -15.6584 to -4.2135 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 171.6120 to 188.1907 deg, Dec -15.6584 to -4.2135 deg
Loaded 4776 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3415 out of 3518 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3518 out of 5414 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.685200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.685200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.68
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.01
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.01
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 5414 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 171.6120 to 188.1907 deg, Dec -15.6584 to -4.2135 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 171.6120 to 188.1907 deg, Dec -15.6584 to -4.2135 deg
Loaded 4776 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3415 out of 3518 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3518 out of 5414 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits (aperture=5.9)
Read 5369 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 171.6120 to 188.1907 deg, Dec -15.6584 to -4.2135 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 171.6120 to 188.1907 deg, Dec -15.6584 to -4.2135 deg
Loaded 4776 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3416 out of 3512 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3512 out of 5369 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits (aperture=5.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 2 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
2.1 pix Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
2.6 pix fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-40-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0141.fits
2.4 pix fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-46-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.0 mag. Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
15.0 mag. Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-40-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0141.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-46-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.7 (SNR ) 11.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.CHUaDBmWnY (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-09_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_004734_TTUQ1b1x1_3083862_ogpuimXj/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=373, passed=5414
Got 5414 stars (including 5029 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5414 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.7 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 965 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5366 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.7 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5367 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5367 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 971 stars left (next iteration limit 1068)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits -region wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.EUvgAYqscY (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-09_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_004734_TTUQ1b1x1_3083862_ogpuimXj/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=356, passed=5369
Got 5369 stars (including 5000 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5369 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.7 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 964 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5325 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.7 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5327 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5327 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 970 stars left (next iteration limit 1067)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits -region wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.jA7RfvI2vA (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-09_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_004734_TTUQ1b1x1_3083862_ogpuimXj/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_004734_TTUQ1b1x1_3083862_ogpuimXj/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-40-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0141.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_004734_TTUQ1b1x1_3083862_ogpuimXj/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-40-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0141.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_004734_TTUQ1b1x1_3083862_ogpuimXj/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-40-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0141.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_004734_TTUQ1b1x1_3083862_ogpuimXj/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-40-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0141.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_004734_TTUQ1b1x1_3083862_ogpuimXj/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-40-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0141.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_004734_TTUQ1b1x1_3083862_ogpuimXj/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-40-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0141.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-40-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0141.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-40-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0141.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-40-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0141.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-40-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0141.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-40-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0141.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-40-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0141.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-40-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0141.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_004734_TTUQ1b1x1_3083862_ogpuimXj/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-40-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0141.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-40-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0141.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=322, passed=4916
Got 4916 stars (including 4589 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-40-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0141.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4916 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 966 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4874 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4874 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4874 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 971 stars left (next iteration limit 1068)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-40-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0141.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-40-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0141.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_004734_TTUQ1b1x1_3083862_ogpuimXj/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-40-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0141.fits -region wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-40-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0141.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-40-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0141.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.0WEnfS7EYm (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-09_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_004734_TTUQ1b1x1_3083862_ogpuimXj/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_004734_TTUQ1b1x1_3083862_ogpuimXj/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-46-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_004734_TTUQ1b1x1_3083862_ogpuimXj/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-46-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_004734_TTUQ1b1x1_3083862_ogpuimXj/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-46-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_004734_TTUQ1b1x1_3083862_ogpuimXj/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-46-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_004734_TTUQ1b1x1_3083862_ogpuimXj/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-46-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_004734_TTUQ1b1x1_3083862_ogpuimXj/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-46-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-46-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-46-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-46-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-46-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-46-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-46-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-46-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_004734_TTUQ1b1x1_3083862_ogpuimXj/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-46-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-46-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=362, passed=4997
Got 4997 stars (including 4633 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-46-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4997 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 966 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4963 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4964 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4964 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 971 stars left (next iteration limit 1068)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-46-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-46-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_004734_TTUQ1b1x1_3083862_ogpuimXj/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-46-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits -region wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-46-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-46-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-40-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0141.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-40-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0141.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_004734_TTUQ1b1x1_3083862_ogpuimXj/wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-40-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0141.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-46-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-46-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_004734_TTUQ1b1x1_3083862_ogpuimXj/wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-46-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Vir-10-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 12:00:50.36 -10:42:18.2: 12.08 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 12:00:50.36 -10:42:18.2: 12.08 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.08 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:00:50.36 -10:42:18.2: ref_mag=12.08 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0893 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20306_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-46-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0142
The candidate 20306_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-46-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0142 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:50:40.45 -12:35:54.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20343_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-46-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0142
The candidate 20343_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-46-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0142 did not pass the final checks
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Vir-10-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_004734_TTUQ1b1x1_3083862_ogpuimXj/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-40-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0141.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_004734_TTUQ1b1x1_3083862_ogpuimXj/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-46-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_004734_TTUQ1b1x1_3083862_ogpuimXj/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-40-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0141.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_004734_TTUQ1b1x1_3083862_ogpuimXj/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-46-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-40-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0141.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-46-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-40-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0141.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-46-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Image size: 941.3'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:00:03.184 -10:00:19.72 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-40-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0141.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-40-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0141.fits
util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Image size: 941.4'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:00:18.131 -10:02:14.09 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 12:00:03.184 -10:00:19.72
Second-epoch image center 12:00:18.131 -10:02:14.09
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0691 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-46-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-46-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:00:15.490 -10:01:30.82 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 12:00:03.184 -10:00:19.72
Second-epoch image center 12:00:15.490 -10:01:30.82
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0542 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 12:00:18.131 -10:02:14.09
Second-epoch second image center 12:00:15.490 -10:01:30.82
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01618 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits &> /tmp/tmp.MzdSJhYvqj
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits &> /tmp/tmp.WYZGjGfWte
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_004734_TTUQ1b1x1_3083862_ogpuimXj/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-40-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0141.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Ivae4jXpIx
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_004734_TTUQ1b1x1_3083862_ogpuimXj/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-40-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0141.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_004734_TTUQ1b1x1_3083862_ogpuimXj/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-46-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits &> /tmp/tmp.jY90bjb6W9
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_004734_TTUQ1b1x1_3083862_ogpuimXj/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-46-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits and wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits and wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits and wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits) and catalog (wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 33704 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 171.5751 to 188.2422 deg, Dec -15.6756 to -4.1628 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 171.5751 to 188.2422 deg, Dec -15.6756 to -4.1628 deg
Loaded 4830 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3511 out of 3743 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3743 out of 33704 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.569300
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.569300
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.41
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.16
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.16
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 33704 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 171.5751 to 188.2422 deg, Dec -15.6756 to -4.1628 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 171.5751 to 188.2422 deg, Dec -15.6756 to -4.1628 deg
Loaded 4830 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3511 out of 3743 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3743 out of 33704 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits (aperture=4.6)
Read 33871 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 171.5750 to 188.2422 deg, Dec -15.6584 to -4.1581 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 171.5750 to 188.2422 deg, Dec -15.6584 to -4.1581 deg
Loaded 4822 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3516 out of 3745 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3745 out of 33871 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits (aperture=4.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 46 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
2.0 pix Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
2.3 pix fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-40-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0141.fits
2.1 pix fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-46-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits
2.0 pix wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
2.0 pix wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
15.2 mag. Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
14.9 mag. fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-40-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0141.fits
14.9 mag. fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-46-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.9 (SNR ) 14.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.MzdSJhYvqj (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-09_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_004734_TTUQ1b1x1_3083862_ogpuimXj/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=1232, passed=33691
Got 33691 stars (including 32410 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 33691 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 431 (Dec -15.7 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 964 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33453 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 431 (Dec -15.7 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33452 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33452 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 971 stars left (next iteration limit 1068)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits -region wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.WYZGjGfWte (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-09_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_004734_TTUQ1b1x1_3083862_ogpuimXj/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=1199, passed=33862
Got 33862 stars (including 32597 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 33862 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 431 (Dec -15.7 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 968 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33593 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 431 (Dec -15.7 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33592 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33592 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 973 stars left (next iteration limit 1070)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits -region wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Ivae4jXpIx (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-09_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_004734_TTUQ1b1x1_3083862_ogpuimXj/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_004734_TTUQ1b1x1_3083862_ogpuimXj/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-40-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0141.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_004734_TTUQ1b1x1_3083862_ogpuimXj/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-40-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0141.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_004734_TTUQ1b1x1_3083862_ogpuimXj/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-40-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0141.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_004734_TTUQ1b1x1_3083862_ogpuimXj/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-40-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0141.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_004734_TTUQ1b1x1_3083862_ogpuimXj/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-40-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0141.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_004734_TTUQ1b1x1_3083862_ogpuimXj/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-40-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0141.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-40-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0141.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-40-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0141.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-40-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0141.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-40-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0141.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-40-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0141.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-40-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0141.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-40-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0141.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_004734_TTUQ1b1x1_3083862_ogpuimXj/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-40-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0141.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-40-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0141.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=12, blended=1210, passed=28978
Got 28978 stars (including 27720 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-40-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0141.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 28978 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 966 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28771 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28771 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28771 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 971 stars left (next iteration limit 1068)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-40-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0141.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-40-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0141.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_004734_TTUQ1b1x1_3083862_ogpuimXj/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-40-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0141.fits -region wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-40-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0141.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-40-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0141.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.jY90bjb6W9 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-09_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_004734_TTUQ1b1x1_3083862_ogpuimXj/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_004734_TTUQ1b1x1_3083862_ogpuimXj/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-46-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_004734_TTUQ1b1x1_3083862_ogpuimXj/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-46-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_004734_TTUQ1b1x1_3083862_ogpuimXj/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-46-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_004734_TTUQ1b1x1_3083862_ogpuimXj/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-46-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_004734_TTUQ1b1x1_3083862_ogpuimXj/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-46-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_004734_TTUQ1b1x1_3083862_ogpuimXj/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-46-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-46-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-46-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-46-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-46-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-46-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-46-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-46-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_004734_TTUQ1b1x1_3083862_ogpuimXj/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-46-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-46-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=1123, passed=30174
Got 30174 stars (including 28998 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-46-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 30174 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 964 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29977 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29978 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29978 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 971 stars left (next iteration limit 1068)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-46-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-46-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_004734_TTUQ1b1x1_3083862_ogpuimXj/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-46-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits -region wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-46-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-46-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-40-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0141.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_004734_TTUQ1b1x1_3083862_ogpuimXj/wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-40-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0141.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-46-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_004734_TTUQ1b1x1_3083862_ogpuimXj/wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-46-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Vir-10-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 12:21:02.23 -14:27:38.9: 12.97 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 11:42:22.53 -14:35:11.9: 13.95 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 11:49:44.40 -12:35:50.3: 14.06 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 12:03:21.93 -15:09:52.8: 13.77 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 11:54:50.45 -05:50:11.8: 13.40 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 12:05:40.62 -06:20:49.2: 14.39 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 11:30:54.85 -08:47:48.4: 15.65 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 12:08:34.53 -12:44:12.4: 14.38 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 12:26:03.33 -09:29:29.1: 15.58 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 11:36:38.12 -08:16:56.3: 15.77 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 11:54:50.45 -05:50:11.8: 13.29 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 12:26:03.33 -09:29:29.1: 15.61 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 12:05:40.62 -06:20:49.2: 14.46 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 12:08:34.53 -12:44:12.4: 14.49 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 12:03:21.93 -15:09:52.8: 13.77 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 11:49:44.40 -12:35:50.3: 14.00 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 11:30:54.85 -08:47:48.4: 15.64 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 11:42:22.53 -14:35:11.9: 13.90 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 12:21:02.23 -14:27:38.9: 12.88 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.34 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.43 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:54:50.45 -05:50:11.8: ref_mag=13.34 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4371 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.77 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.43 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:05:40.62 -06:20:49.2: ref_mag=14.43 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.4561 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.92 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:03:21.93 -15:09:52.8: ref_mag=13.77 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.1342 delta=-0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.03 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.93 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:08:34.53 -12:44:12.4: ref_mag=14.43 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.5697 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:21:02.23 -14:27:38.9: ref_mag=12.92 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1567 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:42:22.53 -14:35:11.9: ref_mag=13.93 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.0082 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:49:44.40 -12:35:50.3: ref_mag=14.03 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.0905 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 11:36:38.12 -08:16:56.3: 15.72 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 12:18:21.73 -12:03:09.9: 15.64 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 12:27:45.34 -08:40:39.4: 14.38 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 11:57:22.58 -14:53:41.3: 14.95 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 12:22:38.05 -14:25:32.8: 14.55 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 12:27:16.96 -14:34:44.7: 14.83 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 12:23:47.67 -07:06:36.7: 14.92 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 11:38:48.89 -05:01:31.1: 15.71 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 12:27:45.34 -08:40:39.4: 14.44 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 12:18:21.73 -12:03:09.9: 15.69 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 12:27:16.96 -14:34:44.7: 14.99 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 12:22:38.05 -14:25:32.8: 14.46 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 11:38:48.89 -05:01:31.1: 15.71 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 11:57:22.58 -14:53:41.3: 14.92 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.41 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 12:23:47.67 -07:06:36.7: 14.85 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:27:45.34 -08:40:39.4: ref_mag=14.41 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.3379 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.90 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.94 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.50 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:27:16.96 -14:34:44.7: ref_mag=14.90 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=14.3259 delta=0.57 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:57:22.58 -14:53:41.3: ref_mag=14.94 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.3635 delta=0.57 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.88 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:23:47.67 -07:06:36.7: ref_mag=14.88 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.5359 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:22:38.05 -14:25:32.8: ref_mag=14.50 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.3782 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 12:29:29.84 -06:06:01.7: 14.94 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 12:12:45.01 -05:06:56.9: 14.99 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 11:50:59.87 -13:01:56.1: 15.00 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 12:22:10.59 -05:19:54.5: 15.17 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 12:25:34.36 -11:05:41.3: 14.72 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 12:25:34.36 -11:05:41.3: 14.78 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 12:12:45.01 -05:06:56.9: 15.14 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 12:22:10.59 -05:19:54.5: 15.00 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 11:50:59.87 -13:01:56.1: 14.82 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 12:29:29.84 -06:06:01.7: 14.78 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.75 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.05 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:25:34.36 -11:05:41.3: ref_mag=14.75 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.5870 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.07 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.90 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.85 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:12:45.01 -05:06:56.9: ref_mag=15.05 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.6499 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:22:10.59 -05:19:54.5: ref_mag=15.07 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=14.3030 delta=0.77 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:50:59.87 -13:01:56.1: ref_mag=14.90 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.5591 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:29:29.84 -06:06:01.7: ref_mag=14.85 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.5016 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 12:20:36.64 -09:19:52.5: 14.62 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 12:14:41.63 -06:12:44.7: 14.88 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 11:50:05.91 -04:46:19.5: 14.74 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 12:29:54.73 -06:10:43.3: 14.72 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 11:39:33.25 -12:07:33.1: 14.91 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 12:20:36.64 -09:19:52.5: 14.75 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 11:50:05.91 -04:46:19.5: 14.93 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 12:29:54.73 -06:10:43.3: 15.01 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.67 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 12:14:41.63 -06:12:44.7: 14.85 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.82 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:20:36.64 -09:19:52.5: ref_mag=14.67 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.5791 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:50:05.91 -04:46:19.5: ref_mag=14.82 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.6846 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.83 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:29:54.73 -06:10:43.3: ref_mag=14.83 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.4373 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.86 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:14:41.63 -06:12:44.7: ref_mag=14.86 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.5566 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 11:39:33.25 -12:07:33.1: 15.28 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.03 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:39:33.25 -12:07:33.1: ref_mag=15.03 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.6293 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 12:28:06.14 -09:02:56.8: 14.88 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 11:46:01.47 -14:08:36.5: 14.80 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 11:53:53.47 -05:10:12.0: 15.32 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 12:15:02.39 -10:52:12.2: 15.03 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 12:28:06.14 -09:02:56.8: 15.53 +/- 0.35 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 11:53:53.47 -05:10:12.0: 14.71 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 11:46:01.47 -14:08:36.5: 15.02 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.03 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:28:06.14 -09:02:56.8: ref_mag=15.03 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=14.7339 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.85 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:53:53.47 -05:10:12.0: ref_mag=14.85 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.7154 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.89 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:46:01.47 -14:08:36.5: ref_mag=14.89 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.6114 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 12:15:02.39 -10:52:12.2: 15.21 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 12:25:23.12 -08:09:41.3: 14.98 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.11 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:15:02.39 -10:52:12.2: ref_mag=15.11 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.7542 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 12:25:23.12 -08:09:41.3: 14.91 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.95 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:25:23.12 -08:09:41.3: ref_mag=14.95 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.7054 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 11:37:49.97 -07:03:48.7: 15.78 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 12:14:40.72 -09:55:25.8: 15.43 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 12:22:54.57 -09:11:44.3: 15.20 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 12:27:23.78 -11:16:41.0: 14.83 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 11:37:49.97 -07:03:48.7: 15.72 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 12:14:40.72 -09:55:25.8: 15.19 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 12:22:54.57 -09:11:44.3: 15.11 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.28 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:14:40.72 -09:55:25.8: ref_mag=15.28 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.7633 delta=0.52 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.15 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:22:54.57 -09:11:44.3: ref_mag=15.15 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.6601 delta=0.49 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 12:27:23.78 -11:16:41.0: 14.68 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.74 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:27:23.78 -11:16:41.0: ref_mag=14.74 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.6184 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 12:04:09.90 -12:18:14.7: 14.86 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 12:04:09.90 -12:18:14.7: 14.74 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.80 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:04:09.90 -12:18:14.7: ref_mag=14.80 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.6372 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 12:19:51.45 -13:49:21.5: 14.81 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 12:03:00.76 -07:16:39.5: 14.58 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 12:27:12.86 -11:17:59.7: 15.26 +/- 0.29 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 12:19:51.45 -13:49:21.5: 14.77 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 12:03:00.76 -07:16:39.5: 14.75 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.79 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.64 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:19:51.45 -13:49:21.5: ref_mag=14.79 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.5376 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:03:00.76 -07:16:39.5: ref_mag=14.64 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.6129 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 12:27:12.86 -11:17:59.7: 15.23 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.24 +/- 0.20
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:27:12.86 -11:17:59.7: ref_mag=15.24 +/- 0.20 new_mean_mag=14.7518 delta=0.49 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 11:43:22.76 -12:31:10.9: 14.76 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 11:43:22.76 -12:31:10.9: 14.94 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.84 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:43:22.76 -12:31:10.9: ref_mag=14.84 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.4888 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 11:59:40.49 -14:41:32.9: 14.95 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 11:34:50.02 -09:56:31.9: 15.02 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 11:42:08.93 -10:21:27.0: 15.41 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 11:34:50.02 -09:56:31.9: 15.49 +/- 0.30 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 11:42:08.93 -10:21:27.0: 15.54 +/- 0.29 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 11:59:40.49 -14:41:32.9: 14.98 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.16 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:34:50.02 -09:56:31.9: ref_mag=15.16 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=14.7195 delta=0.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.47 +/- 0.19
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.96 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:42:08.93 -10:21:27.0: ref_mag=15.47 +/- 0.19 new_mean_mag=14.7533 delta=0.71 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:59:40.49 -14:41:32.9: ref_mag=14.96 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.7105 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52783.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52802.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52832.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52849.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52936.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53044.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 7s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52632_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-46-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0142
The candidate 52632_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-46-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0142 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52634_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-46-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0142
The candidate 52634_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-46-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0142 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52635_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-46-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0142
The candidate 52635_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-46-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0142 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52636_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-46-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0142
The candidate 52636_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-46-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0142 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52637_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-46-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0142
The candidate 52637_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-46-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0142 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52641_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-46-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0142
The candidate 52641_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-46-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0142 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52643_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-46-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0142
The candidate 52643_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-46-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0142 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52644_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-46-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0142
The candidate 52644_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-46-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0142 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:41:16.54 -06:30:52.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52783_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-46-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0142
Preparing report for the candidate 52783_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-46-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0142
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52802_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-46-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0142
Preparing report for the candidate 52802_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-46-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0142
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52832_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-46-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0142
Preparing report for the candidate 52832_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-46-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0142
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52849_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-46-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0142
Preparing report for the candidate 52849_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-46-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0142
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52895_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-46-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0142
The candidate 52895_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-46-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0142 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52913_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-46-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0142
The candidate 52913_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-46-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0142 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52919_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-46-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0142
The candidate 52919_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-46-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0142 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52932_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-46-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0142
The candidate 52932_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-46-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0142 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52936_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-46-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0142
Preparing report for the candidate 52936_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-46-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0142
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52953_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-46-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0142
The candidate 52953_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-46-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0142 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52958_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-46-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0142
The candidate 52958_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-46-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0142 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52963_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-46-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0142
The candidate 52963_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-46-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0142 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52965_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-46-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0142
The candidate 52965_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-46-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0142 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52966_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-46-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0142
The candidate 52966_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-46-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0142 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52974_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-46-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0142
The candidate 52974_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-46-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0142 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52985_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-46-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0142
The candidate 52985_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-46-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0142 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:29:19.30 -12:01:49.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52989_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-46-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0142
The candidate 52989_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-46-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0142 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52993_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-46-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0142
The candidate 52993_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-46-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0142 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52995_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-46-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0142
The candidate 52995_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-46-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0142 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52996_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-46-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0142
The candidate 52996_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-46-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0142 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53005_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-46-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0142
The candidate 53005_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-46-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0142 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53011_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-46-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0142
The candidate 53011_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-46-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0142 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53015_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-46-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0142
The candidate 53015_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-46-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0142 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53016_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-46-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0142
The candidate 53016_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-46-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0142 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53032_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-46-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0142
The candidate 53032_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-46-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0142 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53036_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-46-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0142
The candidate 53036_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-46-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0142 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53044_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-46-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0142
Preparing report for the candidate 53044_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-46-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0142
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53048_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-46-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0142
The candidate 53048_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-46-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0142 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53050_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-46-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0142
The candidate 53050_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-46-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0142 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53051_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-46-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0142
The candidate 53051_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-46-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0142 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53055_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-46-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0142
The candidate 53055_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-46-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0142 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53056_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-46-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0142
The candidate 53056_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-46-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0142 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53061_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-46-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0142
The candidate 53061_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-46-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0142 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53064_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-46-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0142
The candidate 53064_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-46-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0142 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53066_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-46-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0142
The candidate 53066_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-46-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0142 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53074_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-46-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0142
The candidate 53074_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-46-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0142 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53093_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-46-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0142
The candidate 53093_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-46-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0142 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53094_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-46-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0142
The candidate 53094_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-46-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0142 did not pass the final checks
