This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 09.2248 2461169.7248 11.43 10:17:06.78 +14:57:22.5
223.70957 52.17035 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 6.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.11 Parthenope -2 1 3 11.7 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 10:17:06.78 +14:57:22.5: 15.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 10:17:06.78 +14:57:22.5: 15.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 09.2248* 10 17 06.78 +14 57 22.5 11.4 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461169.7248,11.43,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260509.2248 11.43CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 09.2248 2461169.7248 13.70 10:58:15.12 +10:38:06.5
239.24092 58.68611 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 6.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.140 Siwa -1 -0 1 13.7 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 10:58:15.12 +10:38:06.5: 16.02 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 10:58:15.12 +10:38:06.5: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 09.2248* 10 58 15.12 +10 38 06.5 13.7 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461169.7248,13.70,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260509.2248 13.70CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 09.2248 2461169.7248 13.80 10:09:14.36 +16:40:23.8
219.94027 51.13688 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.8" and 6.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.161 Athor -2 1 2 14.2 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 10:09:14.36 +16:40:23.8: 15.78 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 10:09:14.36 +16:40:23.8: 15.87 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 09.2248* 10 09 14.36 +16 40 23.8 13.8 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461169.7248,13.80,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260509.2248 13.80CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 09.2248 2461169.7248 14.01 11:01:00.84 +08:59:05.5
242.54237 58.23375 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 6.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.90 Antiope 0 -0 0 14.3 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 11:01:00.84 +08:59:05.5: 15.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 11:01:00.84 +08:59:05.5: 15.73 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 09.2248* 11 01 00.84 +08 59 05.5 14.0 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461169.7248,14.01,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260509.2248 14.01CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 09.2248 2461169.7248 14.29 10:16:24.37 +10:00:37.8
230.52270 49.70352 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.4" and 7.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.808 Merxia -2 2 3 14.8 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 10:16:24.37 +10:00:37.8: 15.87 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 10:16:24.37 +10:00:37.8: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 09.2248* 10 16 24.37 +10 00 37.8 14.3 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461169.7248,14.29,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260509.2248 14.29CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461120.72857596 21.03.2026 05:28:58.963 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
First image: 2461120.72857596 21.03.2026 05:28:58.963 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
Last image: 2461169.72521131 09.05.2026 05:24:08.257 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 1
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.60
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 6159
Objects passed selection criteria: 6156
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 5737
Average stars matched: 5599 (97.5946 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 112216 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed May 6 12:14:36 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-43-g0c21e0c3
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat May 9 00:26:04 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461120.72857596 21.03.2026 05:28:58.963 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
First image: 2461120.72857596 21.03.2026 05:28:58.963 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
Last image: 2461169.72521131 09.05.2026 05:24:08.257 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 71
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.37
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 10 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 31496
Objects passed selection criteria: 31420
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 29865
Average stars matched: 28737.8 (96.2255 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 133288 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed May 6 12:14:36 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-43-g0c21e0c3
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat May 9 00:27:19 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461169.72448626
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits'
wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits'
wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits'
wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:39:50.454 +14:01:49.13 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:40:19.863 +13:58:49.20 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:39:50.454 +14:01:49.13
Second-epoch image center 10:40:19.863 +13:58:49.20
Angular distance between the image centers 0.1290 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:40:20.482 +13:58:10.26 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:39:50.454 +14:01:49.13
Second-epoch image center 10:40:20.482 +13:58:10.26
Angular distance between the image centers 0.1358 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 10:40:19.863 +13:58:49.20
Second-epoch second image center 10:40:20.482 +13:58:10.26
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01110 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits &> /tmp/tmp.4kVshb19IB
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits &> /tmp/tmp.JoyMynjZhd
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits &> /tmp/tmp.v5kYBZfpcB
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits &> /tmp/tmp.4JvL1m7b4g
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits and wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits and wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits and wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits) and catalog (wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 6682 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 151.7675 to 168.2412 deg, Dec +8.6439 to +19.2936 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 151.7675 to 168.2412 deg, Dec 8.6439 to 19.2936 deg
Loaded 4244 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3452 out of 3573 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3573 out of 6682 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.924550
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.924550
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.60
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.32
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.32
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 6682 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 151.7675 to 168.2412 deg, Dec +8.6439 to +19.2936 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 151.7675 to 168.2412 deg, Dec 8.6439 to 19.2936 deg
Loaded 4244 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3452 out of 3573 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3573 out of 6682 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits (aperture=6.6)
Read 6275 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 151.6959 to 168.1623 deg, Dec +8.5198 to +19.2643 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 151.6959 to 168.1623 deg, Dec 8.5198 to 19.2643 deg
Loaded 4298 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3432 out of 3542 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3542 out of 6275 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits (aperture=6.7)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 1 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.4 pix Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
2.5 pix Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits
2.4 pix fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits
2.4 pix fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits
2.4 pix wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
2.5 pix wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
15.2 mag. Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits
14.9 mag. fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits
14.9 mag. fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.9 (SNR ) 12.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.4kVshb19IB (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=396, passed=6682
Got 6682 stars (including 6282 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6682 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 870 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 870 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 854 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 870 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6520 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 870 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 870 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6518 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 870 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6518 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 870 stars left (next iteration limit 957)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits -region wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.JoyMynjZhd (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=378, passed=6275
Got 6275 stars (including 5894 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6275 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 864 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 864 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 850 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 864 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6135 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 864 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 864 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6139 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 864 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6139 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Excluding outliers - 864 stars left (next iteration limit 950)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits -region wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.v5kYBZfpcB (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=339, passed=5093
Got 5093 stars (including 4743 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5093 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 879 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 879 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 869 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 879 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4989 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 879 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 879 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4990 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 879 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4990 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 879 stars left (next iteration limit 966)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.4JvL1m7b4g (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=341, passed=5034
Got 5034 stars (including 4689 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5034 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 877 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 877 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 865 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 877 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4928 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 877 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 877 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4929 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 877 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4929 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 877 stars left (next iteration limit 964)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Leo-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 10:17:06.78 +14:57:22.5: 15.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 10:17:06.78 +14:57:22.5: 15.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20431.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 5s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20431_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128
Preparing report for the candidate 20431_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 6s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Leo-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
10:17:06.78 +14:57:22.5
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:39:50.454 +14:01:49.13 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:40:19.863 +13:58:49.20 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:39:50.454 +14:01:49.13
Second-epoch image center 10:40:19.863 +13:58:49.20
Angular distance between the image centers 0.1290 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:40:20.482 +13:58:10.26 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:39:50.454 +14:01:49.13
Second-epoch image center 10:40:20.482 +13:58:10.26
Angular distance between the image centers 0.1358 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 10:40:19.863 +13:58:49.20
Second-epoch second image center 10:40:20.482 +13:58:10.26
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01110 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits &> /tmp/tmp.R52gAm2pPl
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits &> /tmp/tmp.52jwV9wKZj
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits &> /tmp/tmp.wJWN2gZ1Nn
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits &> /tmp/tmp.GPPxtyfdek
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits and wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits and wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits and wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits) and catalog (wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 32385 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 151.7675 to 168.2695 deg, Dec +8.6169 to +19.3027 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 151.7675 to 168.2695 deg, Dec 8.6169 to 19.3027 deg
Loaded 4269 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3332 out of 3598 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3598 out of 32385 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.824350
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.824350
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.37
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.45
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.45
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 32385 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 151.7675 to 168.2695 deg, Dec +8.6169 to +19.3027 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 151.7675 to 168.2695 deg, Dec 8.6169 to 19.3027 deg
Loaded 4269 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3332 out of 3598 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3598 out of 32385 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits (aperture=5.3)
Read 31779 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 151.6728 to 168.1777 deg, Dec +8.5198 to +19.2712 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 151.6728 to 168.1777 deg, Dec 8.5198 to 19.2712 deg
Loaded 4310 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3341 out of 3603 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3603 out of 31779 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits (aperture=5.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 67 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
2.2 pix Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits
2.1 pix fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits
2.2 pix fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
15.4 mag. Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits
15.1 mag. fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits
15.1 mag. fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.1 (SNR ) 14.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.R52gAm2pPl (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=18, blended=1352, passed=32367
Got 32367 stars (including 30972 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 32367 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 874 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 874 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 866 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 874 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31787 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 874 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 874 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31784 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 874 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31784 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 874 stars left (next iteration limit 961)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits -region wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.52jwV9wKZj (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=21, blended=1252, passed=31758
Got 31758 stars (including 30468 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 31758 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 865 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 865 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 854 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 865 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31225 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 865 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 865 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31223 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 865 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31223 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 865 stars left (next iteration limit 951)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits -region wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.wJWN2gZ1Nn (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=17, blended=1070, passed=28174
Got 28174 stars (including 27069 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 28174 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 490 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 882 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 869 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27579 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 490 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 882 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27580 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27580 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 882 stars left (next iteration limit 970)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.GPPxtyfdek (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=19, blended=1030, passed=28113
Got 28113 stars (including 27041 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 28113 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 490 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 882 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 870 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27479 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 490 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 882 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27479 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27479 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 882 stars left (next iteration limit 970)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Leo-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 10:17:56.33 +18:47:39.6: 14.93 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 10:44:05.15 +09:30:59.0: 14.57 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 10:16:50.40 +13:43:31.7: 13.11 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 11:09:20.61 +08:39:14.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 11:09:01.51 +08:47:06.3: 13.39 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 11:08:47.79 +08:47:59.9: 9.83 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 11:06:44.25 +17:42:00.9: 12.26 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 11:09:17.52 +08:39:33.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 11:09:20.61 +08:39:14.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:09:20.61 +08:39:14.7: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 11:09:17.52 +08:39:33.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:09:17.52 +08:39:33.9: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 11:09:01.51 +08:47:06.3: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:09:01.51 +08:47:06.3: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 11:09:55.57 +08:38:26.4: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 11:09:55.57 +08:38:26.4: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:09:55.57 +08:38:26.4: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 10:17:56.33 +18:47:39.6: 14.77 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 10:44:05.15 +09:30:59.0: 14.81 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 11:08:47.79 +08:47:59.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:08:47.79 +08:47:59.9: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.84 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 10:16:50.40 +13:43:31.7: 13.14 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:17:56.33 +18:47:39.6: ref_mag=14.84 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.8261 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.66 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:44:05.15 +09:30:59.0: ref_mag=14.66 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.6053 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.13 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:16:50.40 +13:43:31.7: ref_mag=13.13 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2857 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 11:06:44.25 +17:42:00.9: 12.30 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.28 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:06:44.25 +17:42:00.9: ref_mag=12.28 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2808 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 10:12:30.49 +17:24:39.6: 13.47 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 11:09:41.30 +08:44:29.8: 13.77 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 11:09:34.51 +08:40:12.7: 13.80 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 11:09:41.30 +08:44:29.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:09:41.30 +08:44:29.8: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 11:09:34.51 +08:40:12.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:09:34.51 +08:40:12.7: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 10:12:30.49 +17:24:39.6: 13.54 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.50 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:12:30.49 +17:24:39.6: ref_mag=13.50 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6048 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 10:58:15.12 +10:38:06.5: 16.02 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 11:09:49.81 +08:45:36.6: 14.17 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 10:09:14.36 +16:40:23.8: 15.78 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 11:01:00.84 +08:59:05.5: 15.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 11:09:49.81 +08:45:36.6: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:09:49.81 +08:45:36.6: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 11:06:38.18 +08:45:48.8: 14.45 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 11:06:38.18 +08:45:48.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:06:38.18 +08:45:48.8: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 11:08:43.63 +08:48:16.8: 14.10 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 10:28:32.99 +14:19:17.5: 13.60 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 10:58:15.12 +10:38:06.5: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 11:09:47.93 +08:38:42.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 11:09:47.93 +08:38:42.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:09:47.93 +08:38:42.7: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 11:01:00.84 +08:59:05.5: 15.73 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 10:09:14.36 +16:40:23.8: 15.87 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 10:16:24.37 +10:00:37.8: 15.87 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 11:08:43.63 +08:48:16.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:08:43.63 +08:48:16.8: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 11:10:03.49 +14:42:59.4: 14.58 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 10:28:32.99 +14:19:17.5: 13.85 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.68 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:28:32.99 +14:19:17.5: ref_mag=13.68 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.0760 delta=-0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 11:04:41.30 +08:47:18.3: 14.56 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 10:16:24.37 +10:00:37.8: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 11:10:03.49 +14:42:59.4: 14.68 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.62 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:10:03.49 +14:42:59.4: ref_mag=14.62 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.4741 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 11:09:13.50 +09:54:25.0: 14.36 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 11:09:29.29 +11:01:57.0: 15.01 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 11:04:41.30 +08:47:18.3: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:04:41.30 +08:47:18.3: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 11:11:49.97 +13:54:21.0: 15.05 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 11:09:13.50 +09:54:25.0: 14.58 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.44 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:09:13.50 +09:54:25.0: ref_mag=14.44 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.2671 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 11:00:06.41 +09:21:12.2: 14.67 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 11:09:29.29 +11:01:57.0: 14.58 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.75 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:09:29.29 +11:01:57.0: ref_mag=14.75 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.4963 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 11:11:49.97 +13:54:21.0: 14.83 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 11:12:38.05 +16:32:30.3: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.93 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:11:49.97 +13:54:21.0: ref_mag=14.93 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.4900 delta=0.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 11:12:38.05 +16:32:30.3: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:12:38.05 +16:32:30.3: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 11:00:06.41 +09:21:12.2: 14.75 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.70 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:00:06.41 +09:21:12.2: ref_mag=14.70 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.4167 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 10:13:38.84 +18:30:52.8: 15.05 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 11:03:34.62 +09:09:12.6: 14.93 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 10:13:38.84 +18:30:52.8: 15.01 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.03 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 10:59:24.25 +14:00:56.5: 14.09 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:13:38.84 +18:30:52.8: ref_mag=15.03 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.6719 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 11:10:19.32 +13:06:05.6: 14.74 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 11:02:59.29 +17:19:49.0: 14.97 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 11:03:34.62 +09:09:12.6: 15.02 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.97 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:03:34.62 +09:09:12.6: ref_mag=14.97 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.5491 delta=0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 11:09:58.43 +08:42:46.9: 14.75 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 11:09:58.43 +08:42:46.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:09:58.43 +08:42:46.9: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 11:10:19.32 +13:06:05.6: 15.03 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 10:59:24.25 +14:00:56.5: 14.07 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.82 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:10:19.32 +13:06:05.6: ref_mag=14.82 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.5682 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.08 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:59:24.25 +14:00:56.5: ref_mag=14.08 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.5176 delta=-0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 11:02:59.29 +17:19:49.0: 15.05 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.00 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:02:59.29 +17:19:49.0: ref_mag=15.00 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.5949 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 11:08:44.31 +10:43:55.9: 15.16 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 11:11:07.39 +13:03:13.4: 14.83 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 11:07:50.16 +18:23:59.3: 15.15 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 11:08:44.49 +10:17:58.7: 14.76 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 10:10:55.04 +16:29:01.8: 15.01 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 11:11:05.61 +11:11:49.4: 14.89 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 11:08:44.31 +10:43:55.9: 14.86 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 11:11:07.39 +13:03:13.4: 15.40 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.99 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:08:44.31 +10:43:55.9: ref_mag=14.99 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.6516 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.95 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 11:07:50.16 +18:23:59.3: 15.29 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:11:07.39 +13:03:13.4: ref_mag=14.95 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.7064 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.20 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:07:50.16 +18:23:59.3: ref_mag=15.20 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.8398 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 11:08:44.49 +10:17:58.7: 14.77 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 11:11:05.61 +11:11:49.4: 15.01 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.76 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 10:10:55.04 +16:29:01.8: 15.09 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:08:44.49 +10:17:58.7: ref_mag=14.76 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.5772 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.94 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.05 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:11:05.61 +11:11:49.4: ref_mag=14.94 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.7514 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:10:55.04 +16:29:01.8: ref_mag=15.05 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.7119 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 11:10:27.94 +13:49:14.4: 14.97 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 11:08:44.44 +09:50:45.5: 15.10 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 10:10:51.95 +17:37:26.6: 14.54 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 11:09:56.06 +16:24:43.5: 15.07 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 11:08:01.60 +08:53:01.7: 14.98 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 10:23:44.10 +19:15:30.4: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 10:23:44.10 +19:15:30.4: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:23:44.10 +19:15:30.4: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 11:10:27.94 +13:49:14.4: 15.33 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 11:08:44.44 +09:50:45.5: 14.79 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.06 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:10:27.94 +13:49:14.4: ref_mag=15.06 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.7649 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.91 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 10:10:51.95 +17:37:26.6: 14.63 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:08:44.44 +09:50:45.5: ref_mag=14.91 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.6264 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.58 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:10:51.95 +17:37:26.6: ref_mag=14.58 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.6835 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 11:09:56.06 +16:24:43.5: 15.09 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.08 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 11:08:01.60 +08:53:01.7: 15.25 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:09:56.06 +16:24:43.5: ref_mag=15.08 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.8812 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.07 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:08:01.60 +08:53:01.7: ref_mag=15.07 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.6352 delta=0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 11:07:59.78 +16:32:21.2: 15.60 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 11:09:38.74 +12:38:02.2: 14.84 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 11:11:28.11 +16:56:08.2: 15.09 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 11:10:02.91 +15:22:42.1: 15.23 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 10:08:55.11 +15:06:34.2: 15.01 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 11:07:59.78 +16:32:21.2: 15.22 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 11:07:27.44 +10:53:15.4: 15.07 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.38 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:07:59.78 +16:32:21.2: ref_mag=15.38 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=14.8897 delta=0.49 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 11:09:38.74 +12:38:02.2: 14.73 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 11:11:28.11 +16:56:08.2: 14.88 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.79 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:09:38.74 +12:38:02.2: ref_mag=14.79 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.6789 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.98 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:11:28.11 +16:56:08.2: ref_mag=14.98 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.8629 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 11:10:02.91 +15:22:42.1: 15.33 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 10:08:55.11 +15:06:34.2: 15.22 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.27 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:10:02.91 +15:22:42.1: ref_mag=15.27 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.9440 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.09 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:08:55.11 +15:06:34.2: ref_mag=15.09 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.8196 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 11:07:27.44 +10:53:15.4: 15.40 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.16 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:07:27.44 +10:53:15.4: ref_mag=15.16 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.8182 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 10:13:06.65 +18:30:11.2: 15.18 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 10:56:57.65 +17:26:57.0: 15.33 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 10:57:34.76 +08:46:01.9: 14.84 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 10:57:34.76 +08:46:01.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:57:34.76 +08:46:01.9: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 11:12:08.23 +14:06:39.3: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 10:51:47.16 +08:46:24.0: 14.91 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 10:13:06.65 +18:30:11.2: 15.14 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.16 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 10:56:57.65 +17:26:57.0: 15.10 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:13:06.65 +18:30:11.2: ref_mag=15.16 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.8513 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.20 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:56:57.65 +17:26:57.0: ref_mag=15.20 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.8041 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 11:12:08.23 +14:06:39.3: 15.10 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:12:08.23 +14:06:39.3: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 10:51:47.16 +08:46:24.0: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:51:47.16 +08:46:24.0: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53297.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53311.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53388.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53509.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 10s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52809_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128
The candidate 52809_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52811_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128
The candidate 52811_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52817_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128
The candidate 52817_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:03:55.68 +15:01:06.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52829_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128
The candidate 52829_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52890_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128
The candidate 52890_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:17:06.77 +14:57:22.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52959_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128
The candidate 52959_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52961_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128
The candidate 52961_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53032_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128
The candidate 53032_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53131_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128
The candidate 53131_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53153_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128
The candidate 53153_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53169_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128
The candidate 53169_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:57:56.31 +09:23:14.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53210_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128
The candidate 53210_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53218_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128
The candidate 53218_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53229_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128
The candidate 53229_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53230_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128
The candidate 53230_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53257_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128
The candidate 53257_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:28:21.62 +15:46:16.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53258_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128
The candidate 53258_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:08:38.55 +11:59:19.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53297_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128
Preparing report for the candidate 53297_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53311_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128
Preparing report for the candidate 53311_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53317_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128
The candidate 53317_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53386_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128
The candidate 53386_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:07:54.80 +17:43:04.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53388_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128
Preparing report for the candidate 53388_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53407_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128
The candidate 53407_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53417_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128
The candidate 53417_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53426_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128
The candidate 53426_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:11:18.00 +11:33:16.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53453_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128
The candidate 53453_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53480_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128
The candidate 53480_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53509_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128
Preparing report for the candidate 53509_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53515_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128
The candidate 53515_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53519_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128
The candidate 53519_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:12:09.71 +18:55:25.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53528_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128
The candidate 53528_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53529_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128
The candidate 53529_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53560_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128
The candidate 53560_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53566_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128
The candidate 53566_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53576_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128
The candidate 53576_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53578_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128
The candidate 53578_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53583_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128
The candidate 53583_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53592_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128
The candidate 53592_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53593_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128
The candidate 53593_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:10:34.93 +18:40:42.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53599_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128
The candidate 53599_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53601_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128
The candidate 53601_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53604_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128
The candidate 53604_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53614_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128
The candidate 53614_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53620_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128
The candidate 53620_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53624_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128
The candidate 53624_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53630_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128
The candidate 53630_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53633_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128
The candidate 53633_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53640_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128
The candidate 53640_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53641_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128
The candidate 53641_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53650_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128
The candidate 53650_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53662_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128
The candidate 53662_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53674_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128
The candidate 53674_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53690_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128
The candidate 53690_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53697_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128
The candidate 53697_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53698_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128
The candidate 53698_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53701_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128
The candidate 53701_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53704_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128
The candidate 53704_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53719_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128
The candidate 53719_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:10:01.39 +09:54:02.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53720_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128
The candidate 53720_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53734_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128
The candidate 53734_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53735_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128
The candidate 53735_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53736_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128
The candidate 53736_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53739_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128
The candidate 53739_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53749_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128
The candidate 53749_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53751_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128
The candidate 53751_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53775_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128
The candidate 53775_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53792_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128
The candidate 53792_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 did not pass the final checks