NMW transient search results

This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh

The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.

Processing fields Leo-05-Q1b1x1

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 05 09.22449    2461169.72449    11.41    10:17:06.77 +14:57:22.6   8211 2773   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 05 09.22521    2461169.72521    11.44    10:17:06.80 +14:57:22.4   8213 2766   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 05 09.2248  2461169.7248  11.43  10:17:06.78 +14:57:22.5
223.70957  52.17035 galactic  Leo  Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 6.7 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
11 Parthenope              -2      1       3  11.7     0    0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 10:17:06.78 +14:57:22.5:  15.82 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 10:17:06.78 +14:57:22.5:  15.82 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 05 09.22449    2461169.72449    13.74    10:58:15.15 +10:38:06.1   2008 5026   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 05 09.22521    2461169.72521    13.65    10:58:15.09 +10:38:07.0   2010 5019   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 05 09.2248  2461169.7248  13.70  10:58:15.12 +10:38:06.5
239.24092  58.68611 galactic  Leo  Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 6.9 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
140 Siwa                    -1     -0       1  13.7    -0    0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 10:58:15.12 +10:38:06.5:  16.02 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 10:58:15.12 +10:38:06.5:  15.89 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 05 09.22449    2461169.72449    13.84    10:09:14.30 +16:40:24.0   9408 1763   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 05 09.22521    2461169.72521    13.76    10:09:14.42 +16:40:23.6   9410 1756   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 05 09.2248  2461169.7248  13.80  10:09:14.36 +16:40:23.8
219.94027  51.13688 galactic  Leo  Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.8" and 6.7 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
161 Athor                   -2      1       2  14.2    -0    0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 10:09:14.36 +16:40:23.8:  15.78 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 10:09:14.36 +16:40:23.8:  15.87 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 05 09.22449    2461169.72449    13.96    11:01:00.81 +08:59:05.5   1511 5996   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 05 09.22521    2461169.72521    14.05    11:01:00.87 +08:59:05.5   1512 5990   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 05 09.2248  2461169.7248  14.01  11:01:00.84 +08:59:05.5
242.54237  58.23375 galactic  Leo  Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 6.7 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
90 Antiope                  0     -0       0  14.3     0    0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 11:01:00.84 +08:59:05.5:  15.88 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 11:01:00.84 +08:59:05.5:  15.73 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 05 09.22449    2461169.72449    14.28    10:16:24.30 +10:00:37.0   8208 5776   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 05 09.22521    2461169.72521    14.29    10:16:24.43 +10:00:38.5   8210 5769   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 05 09.2248  2461169.7248  14.29  10:16:24.37 +10:00:37.8
230.52270  49.70352 galactic  Leo  Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.4" and 7.0 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
808 Merxia                  -2      2       3  14.8     0   -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 10:16:24.37 +10:00:37.8:  15.87 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 10:16:24.37 +10:00:37.8:  15.85 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Processing complete!

Total number of candidates identified: 5

Processing log:

Filtering log:

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.0
FLAT_FIELD_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-04-22_multinight.fit
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 8000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 4000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 3.5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
Leo-05-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Leo-05-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing Leo-05-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 461832 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 461832 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.png' -> 'transient_report/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits_preview.png'
Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits

renamed 'Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.png' -> 'transient_report/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits_preview.png'
Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits


Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold. ---------------------------------------------- INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 534.9247 INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 496.4573 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1168.6383 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 482.6831 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1170.8435 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 481.7384 ---------------------------------------------- INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 2.18468 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.002 ---------------------------------------------- Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-04-22_multinight.fit EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= -5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 19.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 17.7 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits CCD-TEMP= -5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits SET-TEMP= -5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-05-09T00:23:05.6138592' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-05-09T05:23:05.6138592' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61169.224370521 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-05-09T05:23:15.5162576' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61169.2244851389 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= -5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 159.995985923639 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 14.0000323730229 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 44.2747222222222 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 255.581666666667 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.43098699268904 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Leo-05' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '10 40 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+14 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29464 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29464 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 19.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 19.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= -0.1 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 30.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 896.72 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 17.7 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 339.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 9.400752 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 7.200576 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= -5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits SET-TEMP= -5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-22.fit CCD-TEMP= -5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits CCD-TEMP= -5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-22.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-22.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/d_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits :) Spent 0.513805 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-22.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/d_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-04-22_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 37850.569222 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24504.0, right_median=28262.5) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-04-22_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= -5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -4.9 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 19.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 17.7 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits CCD-TEMP= -4.900000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits SET-TEMP= -5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-05-09T00:24:08.2577447' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-05-09T05:24:08.2577447' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61169.2250955673 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-05-09T05:24:18.1596433' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61169.2252101735 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= -5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -4.9 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 159.99598595669 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 14.0000323554312 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 44.0525 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 255.789722222222 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.43669153205773 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Leo-05' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '10 40 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+14 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29464 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29464 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 19.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 19.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= -0.1 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 30.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 896.72 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 17.7 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 339.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 9.400752 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 7.200576 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= -5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits SET-TEMP= -5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-22.fit CCD-TEMP= -4.900000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits CCD-TEMP= -5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-22.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-22.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/d_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits :) Spent 0.514386 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-22.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/d_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-04-22_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 37850.569222 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24504.0, right_median=28262.5) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-04-22_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:

fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits


fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits


Updating neverexclude_list.txt '/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt' Choosing bad regions list '/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst' wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461169.72448626 Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt '../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt '../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt '../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt' Plate-solving the images wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits' wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits' wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits' wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits' ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits Image size: 937.3'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 10:39:50.454 +14:01:49.13 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits Image size: 941.4'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 10:40:19.863 +13:58:49.20 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 10:39:50.454 +14:01:49.13 Second-epoch image center 10:40:19.863 +13:58:49.20 Angular distance between the image centers 0.1290 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits Image size: 941.4'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 10:40:20.482 +13:58:10.26 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 10:39:50.454 +14:01:49.13 Second-epoch image center 10:40:20.482 +13:58:10.26 Angular distance between the image centers 0.1358 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 10:40:19.863 +13:58:49.20 Second-epoch second image center 10:40:20.482 +13:58:10.26 Angular distance between the image centers 0.01110 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for ar aprallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits &> /tmp/tmp.4kVshb19IB Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits &> /tmp/tmp.JoyMynjZhd Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits &> /tmp/tmp.v5kYBZfpcB Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits &> /tmp/tmp.4JvL1m7b4g Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits and wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.cat Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits and wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.cat Found non-empty wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits and wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.cat The reference image (wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits) and catalog (wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.cat) found 'wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 6682 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 151.7675 to 168.2412 deg, Dec +8.6439 to +19.2936 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 151.7675 to 168.2412 deg, Dec 8.6439 to 19.2936 deg Loaded 4244 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3452 out of 3573 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3573 out of 6682 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.924550 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.924550 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.60 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.32 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.32
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 6682 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 151.7675 to 168.2412 deg, Dec +8.6439 to +19.2936 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 151.7675 to 168.2412 deg, Dec 8.6439 to 19.2936 deg Loaded 4244 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3452 out of 3573 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3573 out of 6682 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits (aperture=6.6) Read 6275 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 151.6959 to 168.1623 deg, Dec +8.5198 to +19.2643 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 151.6959 to 168.1623 deg, Dec 8.5198 to 19.2643 deg Loaded 4298 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3432 out of 3542 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3542 out of 6275 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits (aperture=6.7) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 1 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.4 pix Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits 2.5 pix Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits 2.4 pix fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits 2.4 pix fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits 2.4 pix wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits 2.5 pix wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.3 mag. Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits 15.2 mag. Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits 14.9 mag. fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits 14.9 mag. fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.9 (SNR ) 12.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.4kVshb19IB (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits 570.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=396, passed=6682 Got 6682 stars (including 6282 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6682 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 870 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 870 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 854 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 870 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6520 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 870 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 870 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6518 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 870 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6518 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Excluding outliers - 870 stars left (next iteration limit 957) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits -region wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.JoyMynjZhd (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits 570.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=378, passed=6275 Got 6275 stars (including 5894 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6275 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 864 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 864 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 850 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 864 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6135 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 864 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 864 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6139 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 864 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6139 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44" Excluding outliers - 864 stars left (next iteration limit 950) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits -region wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.v5kYBZfpcB (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=339, passed=5093 Got 5093 stars (including 4743 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5093 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 879 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 879 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 869 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 879 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4989 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 879 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 879 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4990 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 879 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4990 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Excluding outliers - 879 stars left (next iteration limit 966) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.4JvL1m7b4g (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=341, passed=5034 Got 5034 stars (including 4689 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5034 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 877 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 877 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 865 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 877 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4928 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 877 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 877 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4929 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 877 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4929 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Excluding outliers - 877 stars left (next iteration limit 964) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits' Preparing the HTML report for the field Leo-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 10:17:06.78 +14:57:22.5: 15.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 10:17:06.78 +14:57:22.5: 15.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20431.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 5s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20431_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 Preparing report for the candidate 20431_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 6s Prepared the HTML report for the field Leo-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### 10:17:06.78 +14:57:22.5 wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images Plate-solving the images wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits Image size: 937.3'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 10:39:50.454 +14:01:49.13 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits Image size: 941.4'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 10:40:19.863 +13:58:49.20 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 10:39:50.454 +14:01:49.13 Second-epoch image center 10:40:19.863 +13:58:49.20 Angular distance between the image centers 0.1290 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits Image size: 941.4'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 10:40:20.482 +13:58:10.26 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 10:39:50.454 +14:01:49.13 Second-epoch image center 10:40:20.482 +13:58:10.26 Angular distance between the image centers 0.1358 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 10:40:19.863 +13:58:49.20 Second-epoch second image center 10:40:20.482 +13:58:10.26 Angular distance between the image centers 0.01110 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for ar aprallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits &> /tmp/tmp.R52gAm2pPl Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits &> /tmp/tmp.52jwV9wKZj Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits &> /tmp/tmp.wJWN2gZ1Nn Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits &> /tmp/tmp.GPPxtyfdek Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits and wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.cat Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits and wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.cat Found non-empty wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits and wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.cat The reference image (wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits) and catalog (wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.cat) found 'wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 32385 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 151.7675 to 168.2695 deg, Dec +8.6169 to +19.3027 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 151.7675 to 168.2695 deg, Dec 8.6169 to 19.3027 deg Loaded 4269 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3332 out of 3598 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3598 out of 32385 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.824350 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.824350 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.37 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.45 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.45
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 32385 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 151.7675 to 168.2695 deg, Dec +8.6169 to +19.3027 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 151.7675 to 168.2695 deg, Dec 8.6169 to 19.3027 deg Loaded 4269 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3332 out of 3598 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3598 out of 32385 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits (aperture=5.3) Read 31779 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 151.6728 to 168.1777 deg, Dec +8.5198 to +19.2712 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 151.6728 to 168.1777 deg, Dec 8.5198 to 19.2712 deg Loaded 4310 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3341 out of 3603 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3603 out of 31779 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits (aperture=5.2) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 67 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.3 pix Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits 2.2 pix Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits 2.1 pix fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits 2.2 pix fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits 2.3 pix wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits 2.2 pix wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.5 mag. Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits 15.4 mag. Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits 15.1 mag. fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits 15.1 mag. fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.1 (SNR ) 14.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.R52gAm2pPl (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits 570.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=18, blended=1352, passed=32367 Got 32367 stars (including 30972 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 32367 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 874 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 874 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 866 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 874 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31787 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 874 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 874 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31784 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 874 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31784 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Excluding outliers - 874 stars left (next iteration limit 961) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits -region wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.52jwV9wKZj (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits 570.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=21, blended=1252, passed=31758 Got 31758 stars (including 30468 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 31758 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 865 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 865 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 854 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 865 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31225 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 865 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 865 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31223 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 865 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31223 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42" Excluding outliers - 865 stars left (next iteration limit 951) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits -region wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.wJWN2gZ1Nn (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=17, blended=1070, passed=28174 Got 28174 stars (including 27069 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 28174 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 490 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 882 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 869 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27579 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 490 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 882 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27580 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27580 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Excluding outliers - 882 stars left (next iteration limit 970) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.GPPxtyfdek (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=19, blended=1030, passed=28113 Got 28113 stars (including 27041 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 28113 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 490 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 882 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 870 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27479 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 490 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 882 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27479 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27479 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Excluding outliers - 882 stars left (next iteration limit 970) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits Preparing the HTML report for the field Leo-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 10:17:56.33 +18:47:39.6: 14.93 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 10:44:05.15 +09:30:59.0: 14.57 +/- 0.10 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 10:16:50.40 +13:43:31.7: 13.11 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 11:09:20.61 +08:39:14.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 11:09:01.51 +08:47:06.3: 13.39 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 11:08:47.79 +08:47:59.9: 9.83 +/- 0.00 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 11:06:44.25 +17:42:00.9: 12.26 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 11:09:17.52 +08:39:33.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 11:09:20.61 +08:39:14.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:09:20.61 +08:39:14.7: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 11:09:17.52 +08:39:33.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:09:17.52 +08:39:33.9: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 11:09:01.51 +08:47:06.3: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:09:01.51 +08:47:06.3: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 11:09:55.57 +08:38:26.4: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 11:09:55.57 +08:38:26.4: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:09:55.57 +08:38:26.4: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 10:17:56.33 +18:47:39.6: 14.77 +/- 0.13 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 10:44:05.15 +09:30:59.0: 14.81 +/- 0.13 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 11:08:47.79 +08:47:59.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:08:47.79 +08:47:59.9: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.84 +/- 0.10 Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 10:16:50.40 +13:43:31.7: 13.14 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:17:56.33 +18:47:39.6: ref_mag=14.84 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.8261 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.66 +/- 0.08 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:44:05.15 +09:30:59.0: ref_mag=14.66 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.6053 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.13 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:16:50.40 +13:43:31.7: ref_mag=13.13 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2857 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 11:06:44.25 +17:42:00.9: 12.30 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.28 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:06:44.25 +17:42:00.9: ref_mag=12.28 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2808 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 10:12:30.49 +17:24:39.6: 13.47 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 11:09:41.30 +08:44:29.8: 13.77 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 11:09:34.51 +08:40:12.7: 13.80 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 11:09:41.30 +08:44:29.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:09:41.30 +08:44:29.8: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 11:09:34.51 +08:40:12.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:09:34.51 +08:40:12.7: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 10:12:30.49 +17:24:39.6: 13.54 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.50 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:12:30.49 +17:24:39.6: ref_mag=13.50 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6048 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 10:58:15.12 +10:38:06.5: 16.02 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 11:09:49.81 +08:45:36.6: 14.17 +/- 0.09 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 10:09:14.36 +16:40:23.8: 15.78 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 11:01:00.84 +08:59:05.5: 15.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 11:09:49.81 +08:45:36.6: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:09:49.81 +08:45:36.6: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 11:06:38.18 +08:45:48.8: 14.45 +/- 0.11 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 11:06:38.18 +08:45:48.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:06:38.18 +08:45:48.8: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 11:08:43.63 +08:48:16.8: 14.10 +/- 0.09 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 10:28:32.99 +14:19:17.5: 13.60 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 10:58:15.12 +10:38:06.5: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 11:09:47.93 +08:38:42.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 11:09:47.93 +08:38:42.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:09:47.93 +08:38:42.7: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 11:01:00.84 +08:59:05.5: 15.73 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 10:09:14.36 +16:40:23.8: 15.87 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 10:16:24.37 +10:00:37.8: 15.87 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 11:08:43.63 +08:48:16.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:08:43.63 +08:48:16.8: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 11:10:03.49 +14:42:59.4: 14.58 +/- 0.12 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 10:28:32.99 +14:19:17.5: 13.85 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.68 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:28:32.99 +14:19:17.5: ref_mag=13.68 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.0760 delta=-0.39 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 11:04:41.30 +08:47:18.3: 14.56 +/- 0.12 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 10:16:24.37 +10:00:37.8: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 11:10:03.49 +14:42:59.4: 14.68 +/- 0.16 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.62 +/- 0.10 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:10:03.49 +14:42:59.4: ref_mag=14.62 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.4741 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 11:09:13.50 +09:54:25.0: 14.36 +/- 0.10 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 11:09:29.29 +11:01:57.0: 15.01 +/- 0.17 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 11:04:41.30 +08:47:18.3: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:04:41.30 +08:47:18.3: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 11:11:49.97 +13:54:21.0: 15.05 +/- 0.17 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 11:09:13.50 +09:54:25.0: 14.58 +/- 0.14 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.44 +/- 0.08 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:09:13.50 +09:54:25.0: ref_mag=14.44 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.2671 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 11:00:06.41 +09:21:12.2: 14.67 +/- 0.12 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 11:09:29.29 +11:01:57.0: 14.58 +/- 0.14 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.75 +/- 0.11 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:09:29.29 +11:01:57.0: ref_mag=14.75 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.4963 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 11:11:49.97 +13:54:21.0: 14.83 +/- 0.16 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 11:12:38.05 +16:32:30.3: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.93 +/- 0.12 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:11:49.97 +13:54:21.0: ref_mag=14.93 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.4900 delta=0.44 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 11:12:38.05 +16:32:30.3: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:12:38.05 +16:32:30.3: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 11:00:06.41 +09:21:12.2: 14.75 +/- 0.14 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.70 +/- 0.09 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:00:06.41 +09:21:12.2: ref_mag=14.70 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.4167 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 10:13:38.84 +18:30:52.8: 15.05 +/- 0.18 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 11:03:34.62 +09:09:12.6: 14.93 +/- 0.17 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 10:13:38.84 +18:30:52.8: 15.01 +/- 0.17 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.03 +/- 0.12 Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 10:59:24.25 +14:00:56.5: 14.09 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:13:38.84 +18:30:52.8: ref_mag=15.03 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.6719 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 11:10:19.32 +13:06:05.6: 14.74 +/- 0.12 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 11:02:59.29 +17:19:49.0: 14.97 +/- 0.14 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 11:03:34.62 +09:09:12.6: 15.02 +/- 0.20 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.97 +/- 0.13 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:03:34.62 +09:09:12.6: ref_mag=14.97 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.5491 delta=0.42 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 11:09:58.43 +08:42:46.9: 14.75 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 11:09:58.43 +08:42:46.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:09:58.43 +08:42:46.9: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 11:10:19.32 +13:06:05.6: 15.03 +/- 0.19 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 10:59:24.25 +14:00:56.5: 14.07 +/- 0.07 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.82 +/- 0.10 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:10:19.32 +13:06:05.6: ref_mag=14.82 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.5682 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.08 +/- 0.04 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:59:24.25 +14:00:56.5: ref_mag=14.08 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.5176 delta=-0.43 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 11:02:59.29 +17:19:49.0: 15.05 +/- 0.17 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.00 +/- 0.11 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:02:59.29 +17:19:49.0: ref_mag=15.00 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.5949 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 11:08:44.31 +10:43:55.9: 15.16 +/- 0.20 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 11:11:07.39 +13:03:13.4: 14.83 +/- 0.14 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 11:07:50.16 +18:23:59.3: 15.15 +/- 0.19 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 11:08:44.49 +10:17:58.7: 14.76 +/- 0.14 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 10:10:55.04 +16:29:01.8: 15.01 +/- 0.17 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 11:11:05.61 +11:11:49.4: 14.89 +/- 0.16 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 11:08:44.31 +10:43:55.9: 14.86 +/- 0.17 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 11:11:07.39 +13:03:13.4: 15.40 +/- 0.27 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.99 +/- 0.13 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:08:44.31 +10:43:55.9: ref_mag=14.99 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.6516 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.95 +/- 0.12 Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 11:07:50.16 +18:23:59.3: 15.29 +/- 0.24 detection Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:11:07.39 +13:03:13.4: ref_mag=14.95 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.7064 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.20 +/- 0.15 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:07:50.16 +18:23:59.3: ref_mag=15.20 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.8398 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 11:08:44.49 +10:17:58.7: 14.77 +/- 0.16 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 11:11:05.61 +11:11:49.4: 15.01 +/- 0.20 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.76 +/- 0.10 Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 10:10:55.04 +16:29:01.8: 15.09 +/- 0.19 detection Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:08:44.49 +10:17:58.7: ref_mag=14.76 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.5772 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.94 +/- 0.12 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.05 +/- 0.12 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:11:05.61 +11:11:49.4: ref_mag=14.94 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.7514 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:10:55.04 +16:29:01.8: ref_mag=15.05 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.7119 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 11:10:27.94 +13:49:14.4: 14.97 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 11:08:44.44 +09:50:45.5: 15.10 +/- 0.19 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 10:10:51.95 +17:37:26.6: 14.54 +/- 0.12 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 11:09:56.06 +16:24:43.5: 15.07 +/- 0.17 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 11:08:01.60 +08:53:01.7: 14.98 +/- 0.18 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 10:23:44.10 +19:15:30.4: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 10:23:44.10 +19:15:30.4: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:23:44.10 +19:15:30.4: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 11:10:27.94 +13:49:14.4: 15.33 +/- 0.25 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 11:08:44.44 +09:50:45.5: 14.79 +/- 0.16 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.06 +/- 0.13 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:10:27.94 +13:49:14.4: ref_mag=15.06 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.7649 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.91 +/- 0.12 Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 10:10:51.95 +17:37:26.6: 14.63 +/- 0.12 detection Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:08:44.44 +09:50:45.5: ref_mag=14.91 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.6264 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.58 +/- 0.08 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:10:51.95 +17:37:26.6: ref_mag=14.58 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.6835 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 11:09:56.06 +16:24:43.5: 15.09 +/- 0.20 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.08 +/- 0.13 Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 11:08:01.60 +08:53:01.7: 15.25 +/- 0.27 detection Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:09:56.06 +16:24:43.5: ref_mag=15.08 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.8812 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.07 +/- 0.15 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:08:01.60 +08:53:01.7: ref_mag=15.07 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.6352 delta=0.43 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 11:07:59.78 +16:32:21.2: 15.60 +/- 0.26 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 11:09:38.74 +12:38:02.2: 14.84 +/- 0.14 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 11:11:28.11 +16:56:08.2: 15.09 +/- 0.17 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 11:10:02.91 +15:22:42.1: 15.23 +/- 0.19 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 10:08:55.11 +15:06:34.2: 15.01 +/- 0.17 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 11:07:59.78 +16:32:21.2: 15.22 +/- 0.22 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 11:07:27.44 +10:53:15.4: 15.07 +/- 0.17 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.38 +/- 0.17 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:07:59.78 +16:32:21.2: ref_mag=15.38 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=14.8897 delta=0.49 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 11:09:38.74 +12:38:02.2: 14.73 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 11:11:28.11 +16:56:08.2: 14.88 +/- 0.17 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.79 +/- 0.10 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:09:38.74 +12:38:02.2: ref_mag=14.79 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.6789 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.98 +/- 0.12 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:11:28.11 +16:56:08.2: ref_mag=14.98 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.8629 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 11:10:02.91 +15:22:42.1: 15.33 +/- 0.25 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 10:08:55.11 +15:06:34.2: 15.22 +/- 0.21 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.27 +/- 0.15 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:10:02.91 +15:22:42.1: ref_mag=15.27 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.9440 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.09 +/- 0.13 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:08:55.11 +15:06:34.2: ref_mag=15.09 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.8196 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 11:07:27.44 +10:53:15.4: 15.40 +/- 0.27 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.16 +/- 0.14 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:07:27.44 +10:53:15.4: ref_mag=15.16 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.8182 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 10:13:06.65 +18:30:11.2: 15.18 +/- 0.20 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 10:56:57.65 +17:26:57.0: 15.33 +/- 0.19 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 10:57:34.76 +08:46:01.9: 14.84 +/- 0.13 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 10:57:34.76 +08:46:01.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:57:34.76 +08:46:01.9: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 11:12:08.23 +14:06:39.3: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 10:51:47.16 +08:46:24.0: 14.91 +/- 0.14 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 10:13:06.65 +18:30:11.2: 15.14 +/- 0.19 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.16 +/- 0.14 Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 10:56:57.65 +17:26:57.0: 15.10 +/- 0.18 detection Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:13:06.65 +18:30:11.2: ref_mag=15.16 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.8513 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.20 +/- 0.13 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:56:57.65 +17:26:57.0: ref_mag=15.20 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.8041 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 11:12:08.23 +14:06:39.3: 15.10 +/- 0.20 detection Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:12:08.23 +14:06:39.3: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 10:51:47.16 +08:46:24.0: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:51:47.16 +08:46:24.0: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53297.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53311.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53388.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53509.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 10s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52809_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 The candidate 52809_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 09.22449    2461169.72449    14.79    10:44:05.17 +09:31:00.4   4064 5848   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 09.22521    2461169.72521    14.50    10:44:05.13 +09:30:57.6   4066 5842   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52811_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 The candidate 52811_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 09.22449    2461169.72449    14.83    10:17:56.41 +18:47:39.9   8181 0438   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 09.22521    2461169.72521    14.82    10:17:56.24 +18:47:39.2   8184 0432   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52817_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 The candidate 52817_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 09.22521    2461169.72521    13.20    11:03:55.64 +15:01:06.2   1395 2306   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits **** FOUND 11:03:55.68 +15:01:06.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52829_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 The candidate 52829_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 09.22449    2461169.72449    9.51    11:08:47.78 +08:47:60.0   0323 6020   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 09.22521    2461169.72521    9.51    11:08:47.79 +08:47:59.9   0325 6013   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52890_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 The candidate 52890_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 09.22521    2461169.72521    11.42    10:17:06.78 +14:57:22.4   8213 2766   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits **** FOUND 10:17:06.77 +14:57:22.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52959_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 The candidate 52959_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 09.22449    2461169.72449    12.09    11:09:17.51 +08:39:34.0   0239 6100   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 09.22521    2461169.72521    12.03    11:09:17.54 +08:39:33.9   0241 6093   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52961_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 The candidate 52961_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 09.22449    2461169.72449    12.30    11:06:44.26 +17:42:01.0   1124 0651   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 09.22521    2461169.72521    12.27    11:06:44.25 +17:42:00.7   1126 0644   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53032_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 The candidate 53032_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 09.22449    2461169.72449    12.56    11:09:20.61 +08:39:14.5   0231 6103   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 09.22521    2461169.72521    12.45    11:09:20.60 +08:39:15.0   0233 6096   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53131_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 The candidate 53131_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 09.22449    2461169.72449    13.13    11:09:01.50 +08:47:06.5   0287 6026   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 09.22521    2461169.72521    13.19    11:09:01.52 +08:47:06.0   0289 6020   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53153_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 The candidate 53153_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 09.22449    2461169.72449    13.29    10:16:50.39 +13:43:31.8   8223 3519   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 09.22521    2461169.72521    13.28    10:16:50.42 +13:43:31.6   8225 3512   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53169_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 The candidate 53169_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 09.22521    2461169.72521    13.28    10:57:56.34 +09:23:13.8   1995 5779   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits **** FOUND 10:57:56.31 +09:23:14.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53210_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 The candidate 53210_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 09.22449    2461169.72449    13.42    11:09:55.56 +08:38:25.7   0141 6104   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 09.22521    2461169.72521    13.42    11:09:55.59 +08:38:27.1   0143 6097   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53218_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 The candidate 53218_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 09.22449    2461169.72449    13.61    10:12:30.46 +17:24:39.4   8941 1302   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 09.22521    2461169.72521    13.60    10:12:30.51 +17:24:39.8   8943 1296   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53229_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 The candidate 53229_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 09.22449    2461169.72449    13.53    11:09:41.30 +08:44:29.4   0184 6045   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 09.22521    2461169.72521    13.56    11:09:41.31 +08:44:30.2   0186 6038   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53230_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 The candidate 53230_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 09.22449    2461169.72449    13.52    11:09:34.51 +08:40:12.5   0197 6090   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 09.22521    2461169.72521    13.59    11:09:34.51 +08:40:13.0   0199 6084   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53257_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 The candidate 53257_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 09.22521    2461169.72521    13.72    10:28:21.53 +15:46:16.6   6591 2207   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits **** FOUND 10:28:21.62 +15:46:16.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53258_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 The candidate 53258_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 09.22521    2461169.72521    13.87    10:08:38.66 +11:59:19.4   9417 4610   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits **** FOUND 10:08:38.55 +11:59:19.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53297_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 Preparing report for the candidate 53297_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53311_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 Preparing report for the candidate 53311_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53317_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 The candidate 53317_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 09.22449    2461169.72449    13.74    11:09:49.81 +08:45:36.5   0163 6032   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 09.22521    2461169.72521    13.60    11:09:49.80 +08:45:36.7   0165 6025   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53386_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 The candidate 53386_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 09.22521    2461169.72521    13.98    11:07:54.80 +17:43:04.1   0956 0616   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits **** FOUND 11:07:54.80 +17:43:04.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53388_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 Preparing report for the candidate 53388_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53407_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 The candidate 53407_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 09.22449    2461169.72449    14.02    11:06:38.17 +08:45:48.1   0649 6068   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 09.22521    2461169.72521    14.23    11:06:38.19 +08:45:49.6   0651 6061   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53417_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 The candidate 53417_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 09.22449    2461169.72449    14.02    11:08:43.63 +08:48:17.3   0334 6018   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 09.22521    2461169.72521    13.72    11:08:43.62 +08:48:16.3   0336 6011   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53426_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 The candidate 53426_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 09.22521    2461169.72521    14.08    11:11:18.02 +11:33:16.8   0107 4304   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits **** FOUND 11:11:18.00 +11:33:16.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53453_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 The candidate 53453_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 09.22449    2461169.72449    14.19    10:28:32.97 +14:19:17.2   6518 3085   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 09.22521    2461169.72521    14.00    10:28:33.00 +14:19:17.7   6519 3079   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53480_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 The candidate 53480_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 09.22449    2461169.72449    14.22    11:09:47.96 +08:38:42.4   0161 6103   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 09.22521    2461169.72521    14.37    11:09:47.90 +08:38:43.1   0163 6096   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53509_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 Preparing report for the candidate 53509_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53515_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 The candidate 53515_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 09.22449    2461169.72449    14.43    11:10:03.54 +14:43:00.5   0473 2411   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 09.22521    2461169.72521    14.54    11:10:03.44 +14:42:58.4   0475 2405   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53519_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 The candidate 53519_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 09.22521    2461169.72521    14.77    10:12:09.68 +18:55:25.9   9026 0372   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits **** FOUND 10:12:09.71 +18:55:25.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53528_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 The candidate 53528_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 09.22449    2461169.72449    14.30    11:04:41.31 +08:47:19.6   0945 6075   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 09.22521    2461169.72521    14.37    11:04:41.29 +08:47:17.1   0947 6069   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53529_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 The candidate 53529_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 09.22449    2461169.72449    14.33    11:09:13.47 +09:54:25.1   0322 5339   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 09.22521    2461169.72521    14.22    11:09:13.53 +09:54:24.8   0324 5332   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53560_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 The candidate 53560_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 09.22449    2461169.72449    14.44    11:09:29.30 +11:01:57.0   0348 4651   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 09.22521    2461169.72521    14.59    11:09:29.29 +11:01:57.0   0350 4644   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53566_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 The candidate 53566_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 09.22449    2461169.72449    14.49    11:11:49.90 +13:54:21.8   0163 2877   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 09.22521    2461169.72521    14.49    11:11:50.04 +13:54:20.2   0164 2871   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53576_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 The candidate 53576_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 09.22449    2461169.72449    14.41    11:00:06.46 +09:21:11.6   1666 5782   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 09.22521    2461169.72521    14.43    11:00:06.36 +09:21:12.7   1668 5776   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53578_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 The candidate 53578_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 09.22449    2461169.72449    14.57    11:12:38.07 +16:32:29.9   0196 1267   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 09.22521    2461169.72521    14.57    11:12:38.02 +16:32:30.7   0198 1260   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53583_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 The candidate 53583_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 09.22449    2461169.72449    14.58    10:13:38.82 +18:30:52.6   8799 0625   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 09.22521    2461169.72521    14.89    10:13:38.85 +18:30:53.0   8800 0618   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53592_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 The candidate 53592_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 09.22449    2461169.72449    14.44    11:03:34.57 +09:09:13.9   1133 5865   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 09.22521    2461169.72521    14.77    11:03:34.67 +09:09:11.3   1135 5858   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53593_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 The candidate 53593_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 09.22521    2461169.72521    14.66    10:10:34.95 +18:40:42.8   9252 0527   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits **** FOUND 10:10:34.93 +18:40:42.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53599_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 The candidate 53599_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 09.22449    2461169.72449    14.53    10:59:24.14 +14:00:54.8   2006 2974   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 09.22521    2461169.72521    14.50    10:59:24.35 +14:00:58.3   2008 2967   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53601_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 The candidate 53601_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 09.22449    2461169.72449    14.57    11:10:19.38 +13:06:05.8   0341 3385   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 09.22521    2461169.72521    14.57    11:10:19.26 +13:06:05.4   0344 3379   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53604_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 The candidate 53604_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 09.22449    2461169.72449    14.61    11:02:59.30 +17:19:48.5   1650 0927   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 09.22521    2461169.72521    14.58    11:02:59.28 +17:19:49.5   1652 0921   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53614_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 The candidate 53614_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 09.22449    2461169.72449    14.46    11:09:58.53 +08:42:46.2   0138 6059   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 09.22521    2461169.72521    14.47    11:09:58.32 +08:42:47.7   0141 6053   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53620_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 The candidate 53620_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 09.22449    2461169.72449    14.54    11:08:44.19 +10:43:58.5   0444 4842   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 09.22521    2461169.72521    14.86    11:08:44.43 +10:43:53.4   0445 4837   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53624_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 The candidate 53624_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 09.22449    2461169.72449    14.62    11:11:07.35 +13:03:13.7   0219 3403   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 09.22521    2461169.72521    14.86    11:11:07.43 +13:03:13.1   0221 3397   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53630_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 The candidate 53630_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 09.22449    2461169.72449    14.79    11:07:50.12 +18:23:58.9   1002 0209   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 09.22521    2461169.72521    14.94    11:07:50.20 +18:23:59.8   1004 0202   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53633_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 The candidate 53633_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 09.22449    2461169.72449    14.61    10:10:55.05 +16:29:01.4   9157 1873   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 09.22521    2461169.72521    14.89    10:10:55.03 +16:29:02.2   9159 1866   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53640_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 The candidate 53640_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 09.22449    2461169.72449    14.56    11:08:44.48 +10:17:57.9   0418 5106   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 09.22521    2461169.72521    14.60    11:08:44.50 +10:17:59.6   0420 5099   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53641_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 The candidate 53641_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 09.22449    2461169.72449    14.73    11:11:05.57 +11:11:49.0   0115 4530   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 09.22521    2461169.72521    14.81    11:11:05.66 +11:11:49.8   0117 4524   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53650_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 The candidate 53650_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 09.22449    2461169.72449    14.69    11:10:27.93 +13:49:15.0   0361 2948   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 09.22521    2461169.72521    14.91    11:10:27.96 +13:49:13.9   0363 2942   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53662_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 The candidate 53662_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 09.22449    2461169.72449    14.69    10:10:51.91 +17:37:27.7   9187 1177   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 09.22521    2461169.72521    14.68    10:10:52.00 +17:37:25.6   9189 1171   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53674_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 The candidate 53674_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 09.22449    2461169.72449    14.61    11:08:44.44 +09:50:45.7   0392 5382   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 09.22521    2461169.72521    14.65    11:08:44.44 +09:50:45.2   0394 5375   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53690_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 The candidate 53690_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 09.22449    2461169.72449    14.80    11:09:56.05 +16:24:43.1   0586 1386   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 09.22521    2461169.72521    15.03    11:09:56.06 +16:24:43.8   0588 1380   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53697_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 The candidate 53697_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 09.22449    2461169.72449    14.64    11:08:01.57 +08:53:01.3   0445 5978   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 09.22521    2461169.72521    14.63    11:08:01.63 +08:53:02.2   0447 5971   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53698_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 The candidate 53698_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 09.22449    2461169.72449    14.80    10:23:44.17 +19:15:30.4   7358 0128   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 09.22521    2461169.72521    14.84    10:23:44.03 +19:15:30.4   7360 0122   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53701_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 The candidate 53701_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 09.22449    2461169.72449    14.81    11:07:59.81 +16:32:21.1   0878 1337   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 09.22521    2461169.72521    15.00    11:07:59.75 +16:32:21.3   0880 1331   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53704_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 The candidate 53704_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 09.22449    2461169.72449    14.72    11:09:38.76 +12:38:02.4   0416 3678   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 09.22521    2461169.72521    14.65    11:09:38.73 +12:38:02.0   0418 3671   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53719_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 The candidate 53719_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 09.22521    2461169.72521    14.99    11:10:01.41 +09:54:02.2   0203 5326   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits **** FOUND 11:10:01.39 +09:54:02.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53720_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 The candidate 53720_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 09.22449    2461169.72449    14.86    11:11:28.06 +16:56:08.8   0391 1045   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 09.22521    2461169.72521    14.86    11:11:28.16 +16:56:07.5   0392 1039   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53734_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 The candidate 53734_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 09.22449    2461169.72449    14.79    10:08:55.09 +15:06:33.1   9427 2716   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 09.22521    2461169.72521    14.88    10:08:55.13 +15:06:35.3   9429 2709   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53735_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 The candidate 53735_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 09.22449    2461169.72449    14.92    11:10:03.00 +15:22:41.4   0511 2011   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 09.22521    2461169.72521    14.99    11:10:02.83 +15:22:42.8   0514 2004   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53736_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 The candidate 53736_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 09.22449    2461169.72449    14.75    11:07:27.42 +10:53:16.4   0645 4764   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 09.22521    2461169.72521    14.92    11:07:27.46 +10:53:14.5   0647 4758   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53739_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 The candidate 53739_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 09.22449    2461169.72449    14.84    10:13:06.71 +18:30:11.0   8876 0633   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 09.22521    2461169.72521    14.86    10:13:06.59 +18:30:11.5   8879 0627   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53749_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 The candidate 53749_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 09.22449    2461169.72449    14.88    10:56:57.72 +17:26:56.5   2528 0933   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 09.22521    2461169.72521    14.75    10:56:57.58 +17:26:57.4   2530 0927   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53751_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 The candidate 53751_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 09.22449    2461169.72449    14.71    10:57:34.75 +08:46:01.5   2016 6167   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 09.22521    2461169.72521    14.72    10:57:34.77 +08:46:02.4   2018 6160   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53775_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 The candidate 53775_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 09.22449    2461169.72449    14.89    11:12:08.24 +14:06:38.9   0129 2749   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 09.22521    2461169.72521    14.66    11:12:08.22 +14:06:39.6   0131 2742   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53792_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 The candidate 53792_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 09.22449    2461169.72449    14.84    10:51:47.16 +08:46:25.7   2884 6223   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-23-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 09.22521    2461169.72521    14.88    10:51:47.16 +08:46:22.3   2886 6217   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002504_TTUQ1b1x1_1907349_NxqiBYKh/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-24-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0128.fits make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 13s Prepared the HTML report for the field Leo-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### 10:17:06.78 +14:57:22.5 10:58:15.12 +10:38:06.5 10:09:14.36 +16:40:23.8 11:01:00.84 +08:59:05.5 10:16:24.37 +10:00:37.8 ########### Completed Leo-05-Q1b1x1 ########### The analysis was running at tau We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt #### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources #### 10:17:06.78 +14:57:22.5 10:58:15.12 +10:38:06.5 10:09:14.36 +16:40:23.8 11:01:00.84 +08:59:05.5 10:16:24.37 +10:00:37.8 ################################################################################### 10:17:06.78 +14:57:22.5 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) 10:58:15.12 +10:38:06.5 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) 10:09:14.36 +16:40:23.8 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) 11:01:00.84 +08:59:05.5 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) 10:16:24.37 +10:00:37.8 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' # Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix) Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars). ################################################################################### 0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels) This does not look like a test run ################################################################################### exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES #### Nothing to add to the exclusion list #### The observatory MPC code is V36 ############################################################ Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461169.72448626 -observatory V36 02:38:53.04 +14:39:57.8 Mercury (-1.6mag) 05:06:40.02 +24:07:04.7 Venus (-3.9mag) 01:23:39.59 +07:54:20.0 Mars (1.2mag) 07:25:45.55 +22:22:23.9 Jupiter (-2.0mag) 00:39:01.58 +01:49:08.5 Saturn (0.9mag) 03:52:57.71 +20:03:57.6 Uranus (5.8mag) 00:13:37.43 +00:01:55.4 Neptune (7.8mag) 20:34:14.50 -22:55:36.2 Pluto (14.5mag) 20:58:19.00 -19:56:46.9 Moon (-10.6mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 363 May 9 00:26 planets.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461169.72448626: -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 0 May 9 00:26 moons.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461169.72448626: -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 0 May 9 00:26 spacecraft.txt ############################################################ Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461169.72448626 -observatory V36 -> Warning: Longitude 255.61742 is outside valid range [-180, 180] 07:26:11.05 +26:56:11.4 17.7mag P/2009 WX51 (Catalina) 18:55:44.30 -30:20:21.0 13.7mag P/2010 H2 (Vales) 05:25:22.84 -68:43:26.5 17.4mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein) 05:38:40.97 +31:37:43.3 17.4mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS) 17:25:41.52 +13:05:27.8 17.7mag C/2021 G2 (ATLAS) 23:14:24.86 +30:15:28.5 17.1mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS) 04:57:06.49 +26:35:15.7 16.2mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS) 09:11:34.59 +31:52:33.4 16.4mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS) 08:37:03.04 +02:00:46.8 17.5mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS) 18:45:26.07 +20:17:29.2 17.6mag C/2023 A3 (Tsuchinshan-ATLAS) 15:31:41.54 -11:11:42.3 17.5mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS) 09:00:41.14 -08:33:47.6 17.9mag C/2023 F3 (ATLAS) 22:11:36.02 +64:26:37.1 17.6mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon) 18:50:07.71 -04:27:28.5 13.9mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS) 16:58:29.11 +88:17:08.2 17.9mag C/2023 X2 (Lemmon) 06:34:52.28 +63:36:32.0 17.4mag C/2024 A1 (ATLAS) 05:58:12.81 +23:59:39.5 12.4mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos) 16:02:01.36 +10:00:32.1 17.3mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS) 20:23:30.02 +21:58:19.7 14.3mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS) 03:48:12.72 -19:09:27.9 16.2mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS) 05:37:38.65 +40:05:21.0 17.8mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov) 12:17:17.40 +52:58:03.3 16.2mag C/2025 L1 (ATLAS) 05:22:29.88 -06:52:10.2 9.9mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS) 12:45:07.44 +04:10:21.6 17.3mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS) 05:19:57.59 +01:26:44.5 17.5mag C/2026 A1 (MAPS) 00:59:32.17 +40:39:00.1 15.3mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao) 19:27:42.38 -08:30:52.2 10.5mag 10P/Tempel 14:31:09.58 +00:07:55.5 16.1mag 24P/Schaumasse 10:59:07.33 -00:58:27.9 15.8mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 10:42:07.38 -02:48:25.0 17.4mag 43P/Wolf-Harrington 02:24:53.51 +21:17:12.0 17.4mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson 07:56:36.96 +31:42:08.1 16.9mag 63P/Wild 23:56:57.10 -08:52:32.1 15.7mag 65P/Gunn 05:09:13.88 +28:09:25.5 16.2mag 76P/West-Kohoutek-Ikemura 01:58:08.98 +12:35:25.6 14.1mag 78P/Gehrels 00:08:39.70 -02:39:05.7 15.0mag 88P/Howell 03:19:18.58 +26:06:38.5 15.1mag 93P/Lovas 05:42:01.42 +33:11:42.6 15.9mag 123P/West-Hartley 09:00:35.54 +27:46:45.0 16.3mag 124P/Mrkos 03:09:58.36 +16:47:21.0 16.4mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt 03:33:36.38 +16:59:33.1 17.6mag 131P/Mueller 03:31:31.60 +18:52:25.2 11.2mag 141P/Machholz 03:36:11.80 +12:44:26.4 11.2mag 141P-A/Machholz 02:16:15.64 +08:48:43.2 10.7mag 141P-D/Machholz 02:35:20.42 -29:38:12.3 17.8mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS 02:08:38.04 +10:09:31.3 14.9mag 162P/SidingSpring 17:13:22.27 -11:06:09.6 16.1mag 235P/LINEAR 06:26:15.70 +35:49:02.6 17.1mag 240P/NEAT 07:52:47.83 -03:03:42.3 17.9mag 242P/Spahr 23:15:17.27 -13:56:58.8 17.2mag 260P/McNaught 02:48:45.60 +26:08:04.5 17.8mag 295P/LINEAR 15:31:13.60 +08:08:46.9 17.4mag 391P/Kowalski 07:45:52.35 +21:17:02.6 17.8mag 450P/LONEOS 06:11:27.34 +43:39:37.3 17.7mag 493P/LONEOS -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.7K May 9 00:26 comets.txt ############################################################ List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html : 21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30 ASASSN-26de 2026-05-6.29 14.51 16:21:49.13 -61:36:14.60 ASASSN-26dd 2026-05-5.15 15.93 14:26:40.22 -24:48:37.50 AT2026lig 2026-05-4.27 14.63 13:17:51.04 +30:25:13.50 SN2026kcp 2026-05-4.46 16.43 11:27:55.57 -13:38:56.90 SN2026kza 2026-05-1.08 15.59 22:28:27.10 +30:17:54.30 SN 2026fov 2026-04-29.6 14.36 21:00:10.71 -32:17:03.90 AT2026kis 2026-04-27.36 16.15 14:32:57.37 -58:13:26.40 ASASSN-26dc 2026-04-27.27 13.42 15:32:05.35 -43:54:34.60 ASASSN-26db 2026-04-27.37 16.06 16:34:34.97 -54:34:58.00 ASASSN-26da 2026-04-25.32 16.11 10:06:55.04 -01:13:49.70 SN2026jsg 2026-04-24.99 16.28 15:15:57.17 +56:18:32.80 SN2026kid 2026-04-24.52 -3.65 07:58:28.45 +57:03:42.40 AT2026kcf 2026-04-24.2 16.89 11:38:21.80 -50:43:06.50 SN2026jkb 2026-04-24.24 15.38 10:06:11.41 -39:41:04.20 AT2026dil 2026-04-24.2 16.85 14:21:40.08 +13:13:46.30 SN2026jlm 2026-04-22.16 15.12 10:53:55.47 -16:06:07.00 ASASSN-26cz 2026-04-22.24 16.32 21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30 2026-05-6.29 14.51 13:45:02.03 +15:17:14.50 ASASSN-26cy 2026-04-21.27 15.78 13:20:52.22 -35:57:03.60 AT2026jcm 2026-04-19.01 16.65 13:36:15.66 -36:53:48.40 SN 2026iqy 2026-04-18.92 17.31 06:34:01.33 -40:07:34.00 ASASSN-26cx 2026-04-19.07 16.16 23:33:57.97 -45:12:11.90 SN 2026idu 2026-04-19.41 15.9 12:10:50.92 +66:55:31.20 SN 2026icv 2026-04-17.14 16.03 21:36:59.06 -60:43:35.90 ASASSN-26cv 2026-04-17.35 -1.18 08:13:26.26 -27:07:30.50 ASASSN-26cw 2026-04-17.07 -1.01 14:49:14.01 -27:29:20.10 ASASSN-26cu 2026-04-16.29 -2.7 17:21:59.44 -38:54:04.60 ASASSN-26ct 2026-04-14.4 15.15 15:25:54.99 +07:49:24.50 SN2026huo 2026-04-12.14 16.96 21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30 2026-05-6.29 14.51 12:23:20.40 +04:53:39.10 AT2026ixd 2026-04-12.14 17.65 17:46:09.76 -61:19:50.40 SN2026icy 2026-04-12.2 17.03 09:25:46.42 +02:13:46.30 SN2026gud 2026-04-11.98 16.49 16:52:15.46 -60:27:45.90 ASASSN-26cs 2026-04-12.4 15.5 04:20:55.37 -51:15:31.10 ASASSN-26cr 2026-04-12.01 15.37 22:25:39.35 +36:45:06.90 AT2026ihl 2026-04-10.48 14.21 19:40:44.94 +00:41:03.80 AT2026imw 2026-04-10.32 16.06 19:52:04.70 +05:53:33.50 ASASSN-26cq 2026-04-9.31 14.98 16:08:18.39 -64:11:08.80 ASASSN-26cp 2026-04-9.29 13.32 09:22:22.90 -61:02:43.70 SN2026idh 2026-04-7.97 16.34 05:06:54.12 -19:42:26.40 AT2026imr 2026-04-8 17.49 07:14:55.34 -36:03:21.40 AT2026hei 2026-04-8.12 16.7 21:35:33.14 -19:01:34.80 AT2026ihm 2026-04-8.36 16.7 04:28:24.08 -32:25:35.30 AT2026imo 2026-04-8.02 16.81 05:10:35.79 -39:38:40.80 SN 2026hnn 2026-04-7.04 17.07 09:54:32.04 -01:17:25.80 ASASSN-26cn 2026-04-7.01 15.58 07:46:24.43 -77:29:36.30 ASASSN-26co 2026-04-7.15 15.11 05:00:45.52 -29:51:06.20 AT2026hvw 2026-04-6.03 16.51 19:49:33.10 -23:37:11.00 ASASSN-26cl 2026-04-5.29 14.98 19:32:43.55 -22:39:33.40 ASASSN-26cm 2026-04-4.3 13.88 18:08:57.38 +76:48:23.60 ASASSN-26ck 2026-04-2.37 15.38 16:16:36.10 +44:52:30.20 AT2026hyy 2026-04-2.58 13.81 21:55:23.31 -34:48:53.90 ASASSN-26cj 2026-03-30.4 -1.47 11:19:50.81 -27:51:50.40 SN2026gvk 2026-03-30 15.28 11:53:57.02 -23:09:46.20 SN2026gzx 2026-03-28.75 15.27 07:13:46.14 -33:10:15.70 ASASSN-26ci 2026-03-28.15 15.14 09:03:36.09 -67:58:13.00 SN2026hkg 2026-03-28.19 15.82 07:03:00.72 +39:14:43.00 SN2026fin 2026-03-28.27 15.82 05:35:42.80 -63:44:05.50 ASASSN-26ch 2026-03-27.86 13.02 11:23:19.04 +34:22:38.00 SN2026fwt 2026-03-27.3 16.56 19:03:49.79 +37:04:05.20 ASASSN-26ce 2026-03-26.56 16.3 20:26:56.07 -52:54:06.50 AT2026hiy 2026-03-26.35 16.95 05:25:54.76 -30:15:35.80 ASASSN-26cg 2026-03-25.07 16.88 06:57:16.49 -26:54:37.20 SN2026fzb 2026-03-25.14 15.8 14:37:38.23 -43:00:52.30 ASASSN-26cd 2026-03-24.24 12.52 17:34:53.03 +06:04:29.70 AT2026gzl 2026-03-23.27 15.82 08:30:02.60 -35:12:47.50 ASASSN-26cf 2026-03-23.2 14.82 16:54:25.33 +37:49:56.60 SN 2026evz 2026-03-21.32 17.54 17:06:19.20 -18:54:19.50 ASASSN-26bx 2026-03-21.25 16.39 19:01:16.28 -29:29:23.10 ASASSN-26bw 2026-03-21.33 15.81 08:46:05.75 +10:47:39.80 ASASSN-26ca 2026-03-21.13 14.27 12:14:58.16 +63:47:16.20 SN 2026fvx 2026-03-21.12 15.6 18:02:55.90 -75:23:02.60 ASASSN-26bz 2026-03-21.32 16.16 12:16:02.88 -53:16:33.80 ASASSN-26cc 2026-03-20.04 15.48 13:08:21.85 +29:13:44.20 SN 2026fmh 2026-03-20.16 -0.33 19:56:38.48 -34:45:21.50 ASASSN-26cb 2026-03-20.35 -3.26 14:32:41.15 -41:38:48.50 ASASSN-26by 2026-03-20.15 -1.31 13:00:42.99 +37:18:34.60 SN2026fjc 2026-03-19.5 15.97 06:02:44.21 -04:11:06.20 ASASSN-26bv 2026-03-19.19 15.67 12:20:27.96 -45:55:38.40 ASASSN-26bt 2026-03-18.8 16.32 07:49:57.30 -56:14:35.10 ASASSN-26bu 2026-03-19.19 15.74 06:04:29.75 +53:23:34.00 SN 2026eza 2026-03-18.2 17.48 11:54:57.87 +69:19:28.90 AT2026fsf 2026-03-18.14 16.95 10:44:46.95 +58:27:29.30 SN 2026enn 2026-03-18.13 17.53 20:45:54.04 -73:26:43.00 AT 2026ezy 2026-03-18.13 16.83 06:53:18.10 -59:10:49.30 ASASSN-26bs 2026-03-18.02 16.93 07:45:09.29 -62:14:36.20 ASASSN-26br 2026-03-16.16 16.78 19:24:27.93 -52:04:36.40 AT 2023uk 2026-03-16.35 14.2 04:52:54.50 -15:20:57.10 AT2026fhw 2026-03-14.06 SDSS 11:10:34.24 +02:58:48.10 SN2026drr 2026-03-14.08 0.2 07:26:45.73 -27:45:13.90 ASASSN-26bo 2026-03-14.17 13.8 16:35:46.94 +58:12:28.40 SN2026ebt 2026-03-12.41 17.12 13:01:19.46 +15:42:15.50 SN2026ehe 2026-03-12.34 -0.18 09:15:55.41 +10:08:09.70 SN2026efq 2026-03-12.16 0.06 03:31:20.92 -35:29:29.00 SN2026evh 2026-03-12.05 17.29 06:26:19.15 -85:18:28.10 AT2026ffp 2026-03-12.16 0.37 14:16:42.30 -41:18:36.50 AT2026fij 2026-03-12.05 15.97 10:45:04.71 +00:06:13.10 SN 2026exe 2026-03-11.78 16.48 18:07:45.58 +69:43:01.00 SN2026ess 2026-03-12.37 17.37 13:11:03.58 +49:06:31.80 AT2026ewa 2026-03-12.42 16.77 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.8K May 9 00:26 asassn_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html : 05:50:50.81 +36:22:45.1 TCP J05505081+3622451 2026-02-17.5511 15.7mag 00:42:51.33 +41:13:49.1 PNV J00425133+4113491 2026-02-20.738 18.3mag 00:43:04.88 +41:29:41.4 PNV J00430488+4129414 2026-02-20.5923 18.84Cmag 17:43:29.74 +11:24:00.3 TCP J17432974+1124003 2026-02-22.3773 13.6mag 09:55:01.59 +69:08:42.7 PNV J09550159+6908427 2026-02-20.893 19.0mag 07:03:25.76 -12:41:40.1 TCP J07032576-1241401 2026-03-10.4268 15.4mag 00:42:36.82 +41:16:05.8 PNV J00423682+4116058 2026-03-12.5744 17.24Cmag 07:26:45.79 -27:45:14.1 TCP J07264579-2745141 2026-03-17.4417 14.8mag 17:57:19.56 -28:08:14.7 TCP J17571956-2808147 2026-03-19.7972 14.5mag 08:46:05.73 +10:47:39.7 TCP J08460573+1047397 2026-03-21.1936 14.5mag 09:55:38.83 +69:05:21.7 PNV J09553883+6905217 2026-04-01.893 19.4mag 19:32:43.67 -22:39:30.7 TCP J19324367-2239307 2026-04-05.4395 13.6mag 16:16:36.03 +44:52:28.9 TCP J16163603+4452289 2026-04-05.6655 14.2mag 00:43:38.36 +41:15:32.4 PNV J00433836+4115324 2026-04-08.079 17.2mag 15:41:11.68 +59:18:26.8 TCP J15411168+5918268 2026-04-12.9625 19.2mag 00:43:35.02 +41:46:28.0 PNV J00433502+4146280 2026-04-23.056 15.9mag 00:42:55.64 +41:14:12.2 PNV J00425564+4114122 2026-04-24.042 16.2mag 21:14:03.38 +56:46:44.1 TCP J21140338+5646441 2026-05-05.3534 16.7mag 15:03:05.19 +22:02:04.1 TCP J15030519+2202041 2026-05-08.3260 13.9mag 07:15:18.25 +47:53:16.7 TCP J07151825+4753167 2026-05-09.1599 14.4mag -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 188K May 9 00:26 tocp_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ : 18:01:42.100 +21:32:35.13 AT 2026kzk 2026-04-03.90 20.91 16:00:29.470 +56:42:30.56 AT 2026kzj 2026-03-30.82 20.63 15:00:42.230 +43:44:51.39 AT 2026kzi 2026-03-23.79 22.16 14:06:25.970 +03:12:50.08 AT 2026kzh 2026-04-24.65 21.75 14:10:15.440 -01:10:59.11 AT 2026kzg 2026-04-24.65 21.84 13:47:04.130 +01:13:46.03 AT 2026kzf 2026-04-24.65 22.19 13:47:52.620 +02:27:07.29 AT 2026kze 2026-04-22.73 22.16 13:08:17.370 +04:32:05.97 AT 2026kzd 2026-04-22.71 22.33 14:08:10.510 +04:19:24.63 AT 2026kzc 2026-04-20.75 21.92 14:13:53.820 -01:39:30.67 AT 2026kzb 2026-04-12.73 22.21 11:27:55.560 -13:38:57.45 SN 2026kza 2026-04-23.30 19.353 22:41:38.669 +02:38:13.00 AT 2026kyz 2026-04-28.49 19.0985 23:29:16.576 +24:40:52.05 AT 2026kyy 2026-04-28.50 19.7087 20:15:32.140 -42:29:45.40 AT 2026kyx 2026-04-27.76 19.99 17:47:21.616 +45:04:00.51 AT 2026kyw 2026-04-15.47 21.0191 17:33:03.665 -03:45:29.01 AT 2026kyv 2026-04-23.41 20.4091 18:12:54.411 +11:22:56.95 AT 2026kyu 2026-04-28.25 19.73 15:07:23.368 -19:30:18.38 AT 2026kyt 2026-04-21.39 20.1002 15:11:40.065 +03:40:33.00 AT 2026kys 2026-04-23.37 20.1546 16:57:17.265 +19:58:21.32 AT 2026kyr 2026-03-06.53 19.9013 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 30K May 9 00:26 tns_transients_list.txt

Profiling:

CPU temperature: 95 C - WARNING