This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_001004_TTUQ1b1x1_1241260_AtyeGq7X
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 09.2145 2461169.7145 11.55 10:32:23.05 +26:35:09.3
205.85352 59.08164 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 3.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.511 Davida -2 0 2 11.9 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits at 10:32:23.05 +26:35:09.3: 15.87 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 10:32:23.05 +26:35:09.3: 15.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 09.2145* 10 32 23.05 +26 35 09.3 11.6 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461169.7145,11.55,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260509.2145 11.55CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 09.2145 2461169.7145 12.54 10:32:21.10 +24:03:19.9
210.65033 58.58799 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 3.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.416 Vaticana -2 1 2 12.6 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits at 10:32:21.10 +24:03:19.9: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 10:32:21.10 +24:03:19.9: 15.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 09.2145* 10 32 21.10 +24 03 19.9 12.5 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461169.7145,12.54,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260509.2145 12.54CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 09.2145 2461169.7145 13.89 10:30:42.65 +22:41:54.4
212.97435 57.88995 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 3.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.508 Princetonia -2 1 2 14.1 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits at 10:30:42.65 +22:41:54.4: 16.07 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 10:30:42.65 +22:41:54.4: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 09.2145* 10 30 42.65 +22 41 54.4 13.9 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461169.7145,13.89,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260509.2145 13.89CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 09.2145 2461169.7145 14.47 09:46:52.11 +23:43:35.6
206.97549 48.41735 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 3.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.567 Eleutheria -2 1 2 14.6 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits at 09:46:52.11 +23:43:35.6: 16.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 09:46:52.11 +23:43:35.6: 16.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 09.2145* 09 46 52.11 +23 43 35.6 14.5 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461169.7145,14.47,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260509.2145 14.47CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 09.2145 2461169.7145 14.93 10:06:32.94 +25:15:47.9
206.26508 53.12931 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 2.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.856 Backlunda -3 2 4 15.1 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits at 10:06:32.94 +25:15:47.9: 16.25 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 10:06:32.94 +25:15:47.9: 16.17 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 09.2145* 10 06 32.94 +25 15 47.9 14.9 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461169.7145,14.93,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260509.2145 14.93CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.85568031 18.01.2026 08:32:00.779 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits
First image: 2461058.85568031 18.01.2026 08:32:00.779 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits
Last image: 2461169.71484655 09.05.2026 05:09:12.742 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_001004_TTUQ1b1x1_1241260_AtyeGq7X/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 3
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.46
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 6780
Objects passed selection criteria: 6769
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 6083.75
Average stars matched: 5936 (97.5714 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 112584 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed May 6 12:14:36 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-43-g0c21e0c3
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat May 9 00:12:39 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.85568031 18.01.2026 08:32:00.779 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits
First image: 2461058.85568031 18.01.2026 08:32:00.779 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits
Last image: 2461169.71484655 09.05.2026 05:09:12.742 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_001004_TTUQ1b1x1_1241260_AtyeGq7X/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 149
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.23
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 13 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 36881
Objects passed selection criteria: 36773
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 33975.5
Average stars matched: 32964.8 (97.0251 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 137520 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed May 6 12:14:36 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-43-g0c21e0c3
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat May 9 00:14:08 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_001004_TTUQ1b1x1_1241260_AtyeGq7X/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-08-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_001004_TTUQ1b1x1_1241260_AtyeGq7X/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_001004_TTUQ1b1x1_1241260_AtyeGq7X/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-08-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_001004_TTUQ1b1x1_1241260_AtyeGq7X/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461169.71417774
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits'
wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits'
wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-08-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-08-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-08-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-08-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits'
wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:09:14.835 +22:00:04.34 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-08-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-08-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:09:37.764 +21:58:45.07 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:09:14.835 +22:00:04.34
Second-epoch image center 10:09:37.764 +21:58:45.07
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0913 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:09:38.105 +21:59:02.32 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:09:14.835 +22:00:04.34
Second-epoch image center 10:09:38.105 +21:59:02.32
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0915 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 10:09:37.764 +21:58:45.07
Second-epoch second image center 10:09:38.105 +21:59:02.32
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00497 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits &> /tmp/tmp.UMh0OfmhHV
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits &> /tmp/tmp.YY17GGb48S
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_001004_TTUQ1b1x1_1241260_AtyeGq7X/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-08-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits &> /tmp/tmp.sXFXhUTovn
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_001004_TTUQ1b1x1_1241260_AtyeGq7X/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-08-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_001004_TTUQ1b1x1_1241260_AtyeGq7X/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Ngf1uaAbzo
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_001004_TTUQ1b1x1_1241260_AtyeGq7X/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits and wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits and wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits and wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits) and catalog (wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 6968 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 143.3687 to 160.8868 deg, Dec +16.3927 to +27.3357 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 143.3687 to 160.8868 deg, Dec 16.3927 to 27.3357 deg
Loaded 4674 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3606 out of 3801 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3801 out of 6968 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.905550
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.905550
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.46
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.45
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.45
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 6968 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 143.3687 to 160.8868 deg, Dec +16.3927 to +27.3357 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 143.3687 to 160.8868 deg, Dec 16.3927 to 27.3357 deg
Loaded 4674 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3606 out of 3801 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3801 out of 6968 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits (aperture=6.1)
Read 6793 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 143.3688 to 160.8867 deg, Dec +16.3928 to +27.3358 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 143.3688 to 160.8867 deg, Dec 16.3928 to 27.3358 deg
Loaded 4674 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3603 out of 3798 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3798 out of 6793 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits (aperture=6.4)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 2 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits
2.2 pix Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits
2.2 pix fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-08-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
2.2 pix fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120.fits
2.0 pix wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits
15.4 mag. Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-08-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.0 (SNR ) 12.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.UMh0OfmhHV (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_001004_TTUQ1b1x1_1241260_AtyeGq7X/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=467, passed=6968
Got 6968 stars (including 6491 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6968 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.4 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 910 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 904 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6899 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.4 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 910 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6897 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6897 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 909 stars left (next iteration limit 999)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits -region wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.YY17GGb48S (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_001004_TTUQ1b1x1_1241260_AtyeGq7X/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=460, passed=6793
Got 6793 stars (including 6327 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6793 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.4 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 909 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 904 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6708 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.4 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 909 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6707 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6707 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 908 stars left (next iteration limit 998)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits -region wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.sXFXhUTovn (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_001004_TTUQ1b1x1_1241260_AtyeGq7X/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_001004_TTUQ1b1x1_1241260_AtyeGq7X/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-08-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_001004_TTUQ1b1x1_1241260_AtyeGq7X/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-08-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_001004_TTUQ1b1x1_1241260_AtyeGq7X/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-08-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_001004_TTUQ1b1x1_1241260_AtyeGq7X/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-08-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_001004_TTUQ1b1x1_1241260_AtyeGq7X/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-08-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_001004_TTUQ1b1x1_1241260_AtyeGq7X/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-08-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-08-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-08-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-08-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-08-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-08-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-08-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-08-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_001004_TTUQ1b1x1_1241260_AtyeGq7X/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-08-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-08-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=394, passed=5362
Got 5362 stars (including 4963 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-08-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5362 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 902 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 902 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 895 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 902 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5298 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 902 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 902 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5297 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 902 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5297 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 902 stars left (next iteration limit 992)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-08-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-08-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_001004_TTUQ1b1x1_1241260_AtyeGq7X/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-08-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-08-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-08-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Ngf1uaAbzo (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_001004_TTUQ1b1x1_1241260_AtyeGq7X/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_001004_TTUQ1b1x1_1241260_AtyeGq7X/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_001004_TTUQ1b1x1_1241260_AtyeGq7X/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_001004_TTUQ1b1x1_1241260_AtyeGq7X/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_001004_TTUQ1b1x1_1241260_AtyeGq7X/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_001004_TTUQ1b1x1_1241260_AtyeGq7X/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_001004_TTUQ1b1x1_1241260_AtyeGq7X/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_001004_TTUQ1b1x1_1241260_AtyeGq7X/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=365, passed=5351
Got 5351 stars (including 4979 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5351 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 900 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 900 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 893 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 900 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5291 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 900 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 900 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5292 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 900 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5292 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 900 stars left (next iteration limit 990)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_001004_TTUQ1b1x1_1241260_AtyeGq7X/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-08-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-08-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_001004_TTUQ1b1x1_1241260_AtyeGq7X/wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-08-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_001004_TTUQ1b1x1_1241260_AtyeGq7X/wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Leo-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits at 10:32:23.05 +26:35:09.3: 15.87 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 10:32:23.05 +26:35:09.3: 15.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20418.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 6s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20418_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120
Preparing report for the candidate 20418_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 02295_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120
The candidate 02295_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:43:25.72 +19:51:39.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 7s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Leo-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
10:32:23.05 +26:35:09.3
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_001004_TTUQ1b1x1_1241260_AtyeGq7X/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-08-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_001004_TTUQ1b1x1_1241260_AtyeGq7X/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_001004_TTUQ1b1x1_1241260_AtyeGq7X/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-08-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_001004_TTUQ1b1x1_1241260_AtyeGq7X/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-08-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-08-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:09:14.835 +22:00:04.34 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-08-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-08-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:09:37.764 +21:58:45.07 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:09:14.835 +22:00:04.34
Second-epoch image center 10:09:37.764 +21:58:45.07
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0913 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:09:38.105 +21:59:02.32 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:09:14.835 +22:00:04.34
Second-epoch image center 10:09:38.105 +21:59:02.32
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0915 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 10:09:37.764 +21:58:45.07
Second-epoch second image center 10:09:38.105 +21:59:02.32
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00497 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits &> /tmp/tmp.cbdDJEcKY9
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits &> /tmp/tmp.vpeICTxdGE
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_001004_TTUQ1b1x1_1241260_AtyeGq7X/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-08-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits &> /tmp/tmp.tF6h5yV4xD
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_001004_TTUQ1b1x1_1241260_AtyeGq7X/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-08-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_001004_TTUQ1b1x1_1241260_AtyeGq7X/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120.fits &> /tmp/tmp.2eqUXvCTuo
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_001004_TTUQ1b1x1_1241260_AtyeGq7X/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits and wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits and wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits and wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits) and catalog (wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 37822 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 143.3687 to 160.9043 deg, Dec +16.3249 to +27.3468 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 143.3687 to 160.9043 deg, Dec 16.3249 to 27.3468 deg
Loaded 4718 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3458 out of 3819 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3819 out of 37822 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.809000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.809000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.23
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.58
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.58
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 37822 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 143.3687 to 160.9043 deg, Dec +16.3249 to +27.3468 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 143.3687 to 160.9043 deg, Dec 16.3249 to 27.3468 deg
Loaded 4718 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3458 out of 3819 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3819 out of 37822 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits (aperture=4.9)
Read 36566 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 143.3688 to 160.9045 deg, Dec +16.3177 to +27.3431 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 143.3688 to 160.9045 deg, Dec 16.3177 to 27.3431 deg
Loaded 4721 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3449 out of 3818 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3818 out of 36566 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits (aperture=5.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 135 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits
2.1 pix Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits
2.0 pix fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-08-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
2.0 pix fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120.fits
1.9 pix wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits
15.5 mag. Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits
15.2 mag. fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-08-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
15.2 mag. fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.2 (SNR ) 14.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.cbdDJEcKY9 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_001004_TTUQ1b1x1_1241260_AtyeGq7X/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=17, blended=1597, passed=37805
Got 37805 stars (including 36130 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 37805 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 903 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 902 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 896 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 902 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37297 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 903 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 902 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37296 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 902 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37296 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 902 stars left (next iteration limit 992)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits -region wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.vpeICTxdGE (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_001004_TTUQ1b1x1_1241260_AtyeGq7X/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=20, blended=1590, passed=36546
Got 36546 stars (including 34883 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 36546 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 903 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 902 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 894 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 902 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36033 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 903 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 902 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36033 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 902 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36033 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 902 stars left (next iteration limit 992)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits -region wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.tF6h5yV4xD (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_001004_TTUQ1b1x1_1241260_AtyeGq7X/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_001004_TTUQ1b1x1_1241260_AtyeGq7X/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-08-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_001004_TTUQ1b1x1_1241260_AtyeGq7X/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-08-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_001004_TTUQ1b1x1_1241260_AtyeGq7X/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-08-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_001004_TTUQ1b1x1_1241260_AtyeGq7X/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-08-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_001004_TTUQ1b1x1_1241260_AtyeGq7X/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-08-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_001004_TTUQ1b1x1_1241260_AtyeGq7X/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-08-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-08-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-08-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-08-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-08-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-08-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-08-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-08-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_001004_TTUQ1b1x1_1241260_AtyeGq7X/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-08-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-08-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=21, blended=1298, passed=31254
Got 31254 stars (including 29906 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-08-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 31254 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 899 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 899 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 894 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 899 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30931 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 899 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 899 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30930 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 899 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30931 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 899 stars left (next iteration limit 988)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-08-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-08-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_001004_TTUQ1b1x1_1241260_AtyeGq7X/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-08-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-08-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-08-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.2eqUXvCTuo (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_001004_TTUQ1b1x1_1241260_AtyeGq7X/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_001004_TTUQ1b1x1_1241260_AtyeGq7X/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_001004_TTUQ1b1x1_1241260_AtyeGq7X/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_001004_TTUQ1b1x1_1241260_AtyeGq7X/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_001004_TTUQ1b1x1_1241260_AtyeGq7X/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_001004_TTUQ1b1x1_1241260_AtyeGq7X/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_001004_TTUQ1b1x1_1241260_AtyeGq7X/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_001004_TTUQ1b1x1_1241260_AtyeGq7X/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=18, blended=1173, passed=31268
Got 31268 stars (including 30045 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 31268 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 898 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 894 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30947 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 898 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30947 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30947 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 898 stars left (next iteration limit 987)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_001004_TTUQ1b1x1_1241260_AtyeGq7X/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-08-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_001004_TTUQ1b1x1_1241260_AtyeGq7X/wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-08-14_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-09_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_001004_TTUQ1b1x1_1241260_AtyeGq7X/wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Leo-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits at 10:43:02.35 +23:03:12.3: 14.65 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits at 10:11:18.30 +19:31:58.2: 14.22 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits at 10:28:16.25 +25:25:36.6: 15.45 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits at 10:32:21.10 +24:03:19.9: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 10:43:02.35 +23:03:12.3: 14.94 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.75 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 10:11:18.30 +19:31:58.2: 14.06 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:43:02.35 +23:03:12.3: ref_mag=14.75 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.5253 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 10:28:16.25 +25:25:36.6: 15.18 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.13 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:11:18.30 +19:31:58.2: ref_mag=14.13 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.3609 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.29 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:28:16.25 +25:25:36.6: ref_mag=15.29 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.9901 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 10:32:21.10 +24:03:19.9: 15.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits at 10:19:38.88 +22:31:50.0: 13.66 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits at 10:30:42.65 +22:41:54.4: 16.07 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits at 10:12:47.42 +24:40:30.8: 13.59 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 10:19:38.88 +22:31:50.0: 13.70 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.68 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:19:38.88 +22:31:50.0: ref_mag=13.68 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7223 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 10:30:42.65 +22:41:54.4: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 10:12:47.42 +24:40:30.8: 13.57 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.58 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:12:47.42 +24:40:30.8: ref_mag=13.58 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.9450 delta=-0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits at 10:06:37.34 +17:54:42.0: 14.25 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits at 10:21:46.14 +21:23:05.4: 14.26 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 10:06:37.34 +17:54:42.0: 14.13 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.19 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:06:37.34 +17:54:42.0: ref_mag=14.19 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.1728 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 10:21:46.14 +21:23:05.4: 14.30 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.28 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:21:46.14 +21:23:05.4: ref_mag=14.28 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.3133 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits at 09:59:49.47 +21:57:05.8: 14.30 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits at 09:46:52.11 +23:43:35.6: 16.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits at 10:36:17.93 +22:22:22.8: 15.19 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 09:59:49.47 +21:57:05.8: 14.23 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.26 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:59:49.47 +21:57:05.8: ref_mag=14.26 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.5900 delta=-0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits at 10:09:34.74 +27:04:19.8: 14.92 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 09:46:52.11 +23:43:35.6: 16.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 10:36:17.93 +22:22:22.8: 15.05 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.12 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:36:17.93 +22:22:22.8: ref_mag=15.12 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.7975 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits at 10:06:32.94 +25:15:47.9: 16.25 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 10:09:34.74 +27:04:19.8: 15.10 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-32-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits at 10:02:46.69 +26:43:04.2: 15.15 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.99 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:09:34.74 +27:04:19.8: ref_mag=14.99 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.8481 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 10:06:32.94 +25:15:47.9: 16.17 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-36-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 10:02:46.69 +26:43:04.2: 15.06 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.10 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:02:46.69 +26:43:04.2: ref_mag=15.10 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.8745 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52149.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52668.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53296.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53444.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 7s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51846_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120
The candidate 51846_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51847_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120
The candidate 51847_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:11:54.02 +18:46:10.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51850_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120
The candidate 51850_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51855_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120
The candidate 51855_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51856_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120
The candidate 51856_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:22:29.42 +21:40:58.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51858_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120
The candidate 51858_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:38:03.82 +25:53:54.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51860_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120
The candidate 51860_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:03:18.04 +25:46:38.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51862_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120
The candidate 51862_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:34:00.62 +22:55:45.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51863_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120
The candidate 51863_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51864_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120
The candidate 51864_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:25:42.11 +26:39:26.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51945_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120
The candidate 51945_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51996_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120
The candidate 51996_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:32:23.04 +26:35:09.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52034_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120
The candidate 52034_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52093_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120
The candidate 52093_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52132_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120
The candidate 52132_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52140_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120
The candidate 52140_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52149_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120
Preparing report for the candidate 52149_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52151_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120
The candidate 52151_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52192_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120
The candidate 52192_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:43:27.30 +24:48:03.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52201_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120
The candidate 52201_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52233_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120
The candidate 52233_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52252_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120
The candidate 52252_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52253_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120
The candidate 52253_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52254_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120
The candidate 52254_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52262_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120
The candidate 52262_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:51:55.58 +24:21:47.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52269_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120
The candidate 52269_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52272_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120
The candidate 52272_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52273_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120
The candidate 52273_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52285_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120
The candidate 52285_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52312_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120
The candidate 52312_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:26:52.49 +19:22:42.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52320_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120
The candidate 52320_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52325_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120
The candidate 52325_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52340_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120
The candidate 52340_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:45:39.54 +23:45:07.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52374_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120
The candidate 52374_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52377_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120
The candidate 52377_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52395_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120
The candidate 52395_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52396_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120
The candidate 52396_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52397_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120
The candidate 52397_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52430_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120
The candidate 52430_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52455_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120
The candidate 52455_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52466_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120
The candidate 52466_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52488_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120
The candidate 52488_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52524_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120
The candidate 52524_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52540_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120
The candidate 52540_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:50:55.90 +20:47:15.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52554_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120
The candidate 52554_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52561_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120
The candidate 52561_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52607_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120
The candidate 52607_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52621_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120
The candidate 52621_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:10:32.36 +25:56:25.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52641_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120
The candidate 52641_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:39:00.34 +26:15:36.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52650_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120
The candidate 52650_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52668_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120
Preparing report for the candidate 52668_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52675_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120
The candidate 52675_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52683_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120
The candidate 52683_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:36:21.16 +26:26:20.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52715_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120
The candidate 52715_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52716_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120
The candidate 52716_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52731_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120
The candidate 52731_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52757_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120
The candidate 52757_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:19:17.27 +20:56:37.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52772_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120
The candidate 52772_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52778_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120
The candidate 52778_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52800_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120
The candidate 52800_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52808_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120
The candidate 52808_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52835_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120
The candidate 52835_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52842_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120
The candidate 52842_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52858_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120
The candidate 52858_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52884_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120
The candidate 52884_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52890_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120
The candidate 52890_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52908_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120
The candidate 52908_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52912_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120
The candidate 52912_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52926_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120
The candidate 52926_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:46:05.98 +20:49:40.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52947_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120
The candidate 52947_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52948_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120
The candidate 52948_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:56:30.64 +26:53:55.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52962_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120
The candidate 52962_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:43:16.23 +22:41:36.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52971_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120
The candidate 52971_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52983_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120
The candidate 52983_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52993_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120
The candidate 52993_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:31:03.74 +22:13:42.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53010_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120
The candidate 53010_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53011_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120
The candidate 53011_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53013_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120
The candidate 53013_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53033_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120
The candidate 53033_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53043_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120
The candidate 53043_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53055_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120
The candidate 53055_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53097_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120
The candidate 53097_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53103_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120
The candidate 53103_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53104_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120
The candidate 53104_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53120_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120
The candidate 53120_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53127_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120
The candidate 53127_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53134_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120
The candidate 53134_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53136_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120
The candidate 53136_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53145_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120
The candidate 53145_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53146_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120
The candidate 53146_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53159_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120
The candidate 53159_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53166_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120
The candidate 53166_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53181_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120
The candidate 53181_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53184_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120
The candidate 53184_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53207_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120
The candidate 53207_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53213_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120
The candidate 53213_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53215_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120
The candidate 53215_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53239_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120
The candidate 53239_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53257_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120
The candidate 53257_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53263_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120
The candidate 53263_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53268_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120
The candidate 53268_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53271_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120
The candidate 53271_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53282_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120
The candidate 53282_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53287_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120
The candidate 53287_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53296_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120
Preparing report for the candidate 53296_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53298_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120
The candidate 53298_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53300_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120
The candidate 53300_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53303_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120
The candidate 53303_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53316_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120
The candidate 53316_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53337_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120
The candidate 53337_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53356_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120
The candidate 53356_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53362_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120
The candidate 53362_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53406_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120
The candidate 53406_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53409_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120
The candidate 53409_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53415_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120
The candidate 53415_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53419_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120
The candidate 53419_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53432_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120
The candidate 53432_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53444_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120
Preparing report for the candidate 53444_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53447_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120
The candidate 53447_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53452_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120
The candidate 53452_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53457_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120
The candidate 53457_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53458_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120
The candidate 53458_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53464_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120
The candidate 53464_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53470_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120
The candidate 53470_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:43:20.55 +23:31:55.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53473_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120
The candidate 53473_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53481_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120
The candidate 53481_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53484_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120
The candidate 53484_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53485_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120
The candidate 53485_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53494_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120
The candidate 53494_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53495_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120
The candidate 53495_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53514_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120
The candidate 53514_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53516_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120
The candidate 53516_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53526_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120
The candidate 53526_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03148_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120
The candidate 03148_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:37:56.85 +17:13:05.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12081_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120
The candidate 12081_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-09_00-09-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0120 did not pass the final checks