This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_233956_TTUQ2b1x1_3878151_lE9hqrXP
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461169.6472,7.18,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260509.1472 7.18CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461169.6472,7.67,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260509.1472 7.67CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461169.6472,7.79,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260509.1472 7.79CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461169.6472,7.88,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260509.1472 7.88CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 09.1472 2461169.6472 13.21 07:13:28.63 +22:22:56.5
194.96807 14.63424 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 0.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.17 Thetis 1 -0 1 13.4 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:13:28.63 +22:22:56.5: 16.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:13:28.63 +22:22:56.5: 16.13 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461169.6472,13.21,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260509.1472 13.21CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 09.1472 2461169.6472 13.56 07:32:52.93 +23:07:51.1
196.06921 19.04572 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 0.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.200 Dynamene 1 0 1 13.9 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:32:52.93 +23:07:51.1: 16.19 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:32:52.93 +23:07:51.1: 16.25 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461169.6472,13.56,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260509.1472 13.56CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 09.1472 2461169.6472 13.68 07:28:00.94 +18:00:29.7
200.54411 15.99066 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.0" and 1.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.34 Circe 1 2 2 13.9 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:28:00.94 +18:00:29.7: 15.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:28:00.94 +18:00:29.7: 15.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461169.6472,13.68,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260509.1472 13.68CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 09.1472 2461169.6472 14.11 07:35:50.48 +20:50:48.9
198.57778 18.80870 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 1.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.206 Hersilia 3 -3 4 14.4 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:35:50.48 +20:50:48.9: 16.17 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:35:50.48 +20:50:48.9: 16.17 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461169.6472,14.11,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260509.1472 14.11CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 09.1472 2461169.6472 14.12 07:32:18.26 +23:04:11.9
196.07578 18.89969 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.1" and 0.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.133 Cyrene 1 -0 1 14.2 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:32:18.26 +23:04:11.9: 16.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:32:18.26 +23:04:11.9: 16.20 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461169.6472,14.12,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260509.1472 14.12CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 09.1472 2461169.6472 14.51 07:35:18.74 +25:39:24.4
193.79127 20.49186 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.2" and 0.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.143 Adria 1 -1 1 14.9 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:35:18.74 +25:39:24.4: 16.07 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:35:18.74 +25:39:24.4: 15.98 +/- 0.33 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.98 +/- 0.33
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461169.6472,14.51,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260509.1472 14.51CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 09.1472 2461169.6472 14.68 07:36:54.21 +21:17:43.4
198.24049 19.20974 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.1" and 0.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.334 Chicago -3 4 5 14.6 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:36:54.21 +21:17:43.4: 16.07 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:36:54.21 +21:17:43.4: 16.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461169.6472,14.68,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260509.1472 14.68CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 09.1472 2461169.6472 14.89 07:31:58.79 +22:21:21.3
196.74317 18.55911 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.2" and 0.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.382 Dodona 1 -0 1 14.8 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:31:58.79 +22:21:21.3: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:31:58.79 +22:21:21.3: 16.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461169.6472,14.89,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260509.1472 14.89CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.73760365 18.01.2026 05:41:58.955 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
First image: 2461058.73760365 18.01.2026 05:41:58.955 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Last image: 2461169.64746936 09.05.2026 03:32:11.353 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_233956_TTUQ2b1x1_3878151_lE9hqrXP/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 8
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.60
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 7 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 13877
Objects passed selection criteria: 13855
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 13994.5
Average stars matched: 12837 (91.7289 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 122660 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed May 6 12:14:36 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-43-g0c21e0c3
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri May 8 23:44:16 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.73760365 18.01.2026 05:41:58.955 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
First image: 2461058.73760365 18.01.2026 05:41:58.955 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Last image: 2461169.64746936 09.05.2026 03:32:11.353 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_233956_TTUQ2b1x1_3878151_lE9hqrXP/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 152
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.28
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 64 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 96692
Objects passed selection criteria: 96506
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 98386.2
Average stars matched: 90104.8 (91.5827 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1903648 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed May 6 12:14:36 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-43-g0c21e0c3
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri May 8 23:47:05 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_233956_TTUQ2b1x1_3878151_lE9hqrXP/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-31-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_233956_TTUQ2b1x1_3878151_lE9hqrXP/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_233956_TTUQ2b1x1_3878151_lE9hqrXP/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-31-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_233956_TTUQ2b1x1_3878151_lE9hqrXP/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461169.64697633
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits'
wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits'
wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-31-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-31-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-31-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-31-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits'
wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:22:55.118 +21:59:39.20 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-31-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-31-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
Image size: 937.5'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:22:54.012 +21:58:36.22 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:22:55.118 +21:59:39.20
Second-epoch image center 07:22:54.012 +21:58:36.22
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0180 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034.fits
Image size: 937.5'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:22:54.394 +21:58:38.30 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:22:55.118 +21:59:39.20
Second-epoch image center 07:22:54.394 +21:58:38.30
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0171 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:22:54.012 +21:58:36.22
Second-epoch second image center 07:22:54.394 +21:58:38.30
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00159 deg.
###################################
ERROR: no shift applied between second-epoch images! The distance between image centers is 0.00159 deg. (min. required shift: 0.00164 deg.)
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits &> /tmp/tmp.lLJ4mj4n91
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits &> /tmp/tmp.5PfBhuZ112
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_233956_TTUQ2b1x1_3878151_lE9hqrXP/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-31-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits &> /tmp/tmp.qZO8gOKySn
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_233956_TTUQ2b1x1_3878151_lE9hqrXP/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-31-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_233956_TTUQ2b1x1_3878151_lE9hqrXP/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034.fits &> /tmp/tmp.t3L07nxTHO
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_233956_TTUQ2b1x1_3878151_lE9hqrXP/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 22550 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 101.7556 to 119.3352 deg, Dec +16.3006 to +27.3458 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 101.7556 to 119.3352 deg, Dec 16.3006 to 27.3458 deg
Loaded 14532 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10648 out of 11733 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11733 out of 22550 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.897900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.897900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.60
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.30
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.30
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 22550 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 101.7556 to 119.3352 deg, Dec +16.3006 to +27.3458 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 101.7556 to 119.3352 deg, Dec 16.3006 to 27.3458 deg
Loaded 14532 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10648 out of 11733 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11733 out of 22550 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits (aperture=6.1)
Read 23656 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 102.0351 to 119.5904 deg, Dec +16.4807 to +27.2946 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 102.0351 to 119.5904 deg, Dec 16.4807 to 27.2946 deg
Loaded 13969 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10670 out of 11761 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11761 out of 23656 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 7 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
2.3 pix Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
2.4 pix fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-31-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
2.4 pix fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
15.3 mag. Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-31-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.8 (SNR ) 11.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.lLJ4mj4n91 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_233956_TTUQ2b1x1_3878151_lE9hqrXP/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2218, passed=22550
Got 22550 stars (including 20300 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 22550 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 954 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 941 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22225 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 954 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22223 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22223 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 953 stars left (next iteration limit 1048)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits -region wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.5PfBhuZ112 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_233956_TTUQ2b1x1_3878151_lE9hqrXP/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2265, passed=23656
Got 23656 stars (including 21362 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 23656 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 951 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 930 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22858 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 952 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22858 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22858 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 949 stars left (next iteration limit 1045)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits -region wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.qZO8gOKySn (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_233956_TTUQ2b1x1_3878151_lE9hqrXP/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_233956_TTUQ2b1x1_3878151_lE9hqrXP/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-31-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_233956_TTUQ2b1x1_3878151_lE9hqrXP/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-31-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_233956_TTUQ2b1x1_3878151_lE9hqrXP/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-31-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_233956_TTUQ2b1x1_3878151_lE9hqrXP/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-31-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_233956_TTUQ2b1x1_3878151_lE9hqrXP/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-31-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_233956_TTUQ2b1x1_3878151_lE9hqrXP/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-31-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-31-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-31-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-31-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-31-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-31-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-31-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-31-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_233956_TTUQ2b1x1_3878151_lE9hqrXP/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-31-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-31-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1009, passed=15294
Got 15294 stars (including 14274 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-31-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 15294 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 924 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15049 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15049 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15049 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.67"
Excluding outliers - 938 stars left (next iteration limit 1032)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-31-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-31-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_233956_TTUQ2b1x1_3878151_lE9hqrXP/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-31-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-31-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-31-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.t3L07nxTHO (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_233956_TTUQ2b1x1_3878151_lE9hqrXP/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_233956_TTUQ2b1x1_3878151_lE9hqrXP/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_233956_TTUQ2b1x1_3878151_lE9hqrXP/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_233956_TTUQ2b1x1_3878151_lE9hqrXP/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_233956_TTUQ2b1x1_3878151_lE9hqrXP/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_233956_TTUQ2b1x1_3878151_lE9hqrXP/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_233956_TTUQ2b1x1_3878151_lE9hqrXP/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_233956_TTUQ2b1x1_3878151_lE9hqrXP/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1001, passed=15285
Got 15285 stars (including 14271 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 15285 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 926 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15027 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15024 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15024 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.68"
Excluding outliers - 937 stars left (next iteration limit 1032)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_233956_TTUQ2b1x1_3878151_lE9hqrXP/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-31-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-31-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_233956_TTUQ2b1x1_3878151_lE9hqrXP/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-31-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_233956_TTUQ2b1x1_3878151_lE9hqrXP/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:02:58.89 +25:26:06.5: 11.46 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:07:33.24 +21:20:41.1: 12.22 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:23:39.13 +25:58:43.6: 12.15 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:12:59.39 +22:26:11.5: 12.07 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:02:58.89 +25:26:06.5: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:12:59.39 +22:26:11.5: 11.87 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:07:33.24 +21:20:41.1: 12.22 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.46 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:02:58.89 +25:26:06.5: ref_mag=11.46 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7374 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.95 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.22 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:07:33.24 +21:20:41.1: ref_mag=12.22 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2842 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:23:39.13 +25:58:43.6: 11.98 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:12:59.39 +22:26:11.5: ref_mag=11.95 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0800 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.05 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:23:39.13 +25:58:43.6: ref_mag=12.05 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2818 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 3s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34568_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034
The candidate 34568_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34571_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034
Preparing report for the candidate 34571_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34572_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034
Preparing report for the candidate 34572_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34603_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034
The candidate 34603_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34609_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034
The candidate 34609_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34612_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034
The candidate 34612_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30957_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034
The candidate 30957_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:43:02.38 +23:26:57.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 6s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Gem-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_233956_TTUQ2b1x1_3878151_lE9hqrXP/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-31-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_233956_TTUQ2b1x1_3878151_lE9hqrXP/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_233956_TTUQ2b1x1_3878151_lE9hqrXP/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-31-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_233956_TTUQ2b1x1_3878151_lE9hqrXP/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-31-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-31-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:22:55.118 +21:59:39.20 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-31-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-31-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
Image size: 937.5'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:22:54.012 +21:58:36.22 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:22:55.118 +21:59:39.20
Second-epoch image center 07:22:54.012 +21:58:36.22
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0180 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034.fits
Image size: 937.5'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:22:54.394 +21:58:38.30 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:22:55.118 +21:59:39.20
Second-epoch image center 07:22:54.394 +21:58:38.30
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0171 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:22:54.012 +21:58:36.22
Second-epoch second image center 07:22:54.394 +21:58:38.30
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00159 deg.
###################################
ERROR: no shift applied between second-epoch images! The distance between image centers is 0.00159 deg. (min. required shift: 0.00164 deg.)
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits &> /tmp/tmp.1eEVIMnWbn
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits &> /tmp/tmp.W6vj19MYsd
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_233956_TTUQ2b1x1_3878151_lE9hqrXP/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-31-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits &> /tmp/tmp.fHSrTgQt7t
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_233956_TTUQ2b1x1_3878151_lE9hqrXP/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-31-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_233956_TTUQ2b1x1_3878151_lE9hqrXP/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034.fits &> /tmp/tmp.jiCAWr4ygA
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_233956_TTUQ2b1x1_3878151_lE9hqrXP/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 153680 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 101.7461 to 119.3352 deg, Dec +16.3007 to +27.3487 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 101.7461 to 119.3352 deg, Dec 16.3007 to 27.3487 deg
Loaded 14554 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8811 out of 12036 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12036 out of 153680 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.757100
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.757100
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.28
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.48
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.48
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 153680 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 101.7461 to 119.3352 deg, Dec +16.3007 to +27.3487 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 101.7461 to 119.3352 deg, Dec 16.3007 to 27.3487 deg
Loaded 14554 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8811 out of 12036 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12036 out of 153680 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits (aperture=4.6)
Read 151496 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 102.0337 to 119.6237 deg, Dec +16.4751 to +27.2973 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 102.0337 to 119.6237 deg, Dec 16.4751 to 27.2973 deg
Loaded 14001 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8799 out of 12010 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12010 out of 151496 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits (aperture=4.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 123 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
2.1 pix Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
2.2 pix fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-31-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
2.3 pix fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034.fits
1.9 pix wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
15.5 mag. Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
14.9 mag. fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-31-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
14.9 mag. fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.9 (SNR ) 14.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.1eEVIMnWbn (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_233956_TTUQ2b1x1_3878151_lE9hqrXP/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=36, blended=17863, passed=153644
Got 153644 stars (including 135507 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 153644 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 941 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 151041 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 151042 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 151042 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 953 stars left (next iteration limit 1048)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits -region wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.W6vj19MYsd (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_233956_TTUQ2b1x1_3878151_lE9hqrXP/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=23, blended=17705, passed=151473
Got 151473 stars (including 133510 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 151473 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 954 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 937 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 148383 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 954 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 148381 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 148382 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 953 stars left (next iteration limit 1049)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits -region wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.fHSrTgQt7t (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_233956_TTUQ2b1x1_3878151_lE9hqrXP/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_233956_TTUQ2b1x1_3878151_lE9hqrXP/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-31-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_233956_TTUQ2b1x1_3878151_lE9hqrXP/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-31-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_233956_TTUQ2b1x1_3878151_lE9hqrXP/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-31-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_233956_TTUQ2b1x1_3878151_lE9hqrXP/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-31-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_233956_TTUQ2b1x1_3878151_lE9hqrXP/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-31-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_233956_TTUQ2b1x1_3878151_lE9hqrXP/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-31-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-31-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-31-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-31-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-31-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-31-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-31-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-31-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_233956_TTUQ2b1x1_3878151_lE9hqrXP/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-31-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-31-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=20, blended=7618, passed=95382
Got 95382 stars (including 87663 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-31-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 95382 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 928 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 93913 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 93913 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 93913 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
Excluding outliers - 943 stars left (next iteration limit 1038)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-31-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-31-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_233956_TTUQ2b1x1_3878151_lE9hqrXP/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-31-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-31-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-31-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.jiCAWr4ygA (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_233956_TTUQ2b1x1_3878151_lE9hqrXP/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_233956_TTUQ2b1x1_3878151_lE9hqrXP/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_233956_TTUQ2b1x1_3878151_lE9hqrXP/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_233956_TTUQ2b1x1_3878151_lE9hqrXP/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_233956_TTUQ2b1x1_3878151_lE9hqrXP/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_233956_TTUQ2b1x1_3878151_lE9hqrXP/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_233956_TTUQ2b1x1_3878151_lE9hqrXP/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_233956_TTUQ2b1x1_3878151_lE9hqrXP/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=25, blended=7692, passed=94952
Got 94952 stars (including 87156 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 94952 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 920 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 92756 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 92757 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 92756 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Excluding outliers - 941 stars left (next iteration limit 1036)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_233956_TTUQ2b1x1_3878151_lE9hqrXP/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-31-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_233956_TTUQ2b1x1_3878151_lE9hqrXP/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-31-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_233956_TTUQ2b1x1_3878151_lE9hqrXP/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:16:12.35 +23:43:14.0: 14.80 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:23:44.05 +25:47:47.2: 13.82 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:03:21.32 +24:25:50.6: 13.90 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:13:01.29 +20:29:29.6: 13.94 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:35:46.72 +20:54:00.1: 14.31 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:21:22.26 +19:43:07.9: 14.41 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:18:13.78 +24:10:30.0: 13.96 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:16:02.63 +24:27:29.3: 14.34 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:13:36.34 +20:59:40.3: 14.63 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:13:01.29 +20:29:29.6: 14.04 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.98 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:23:44.05 +25:47:47.2: 13.86 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:13:01.29 +20:29:29.6: ref_mag=13.98 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.1979 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:21:22.26 +19:43:07.9: 14.34 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.84 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:16:12.35 +23:43:14.0: 15.00 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:23:44.05 +25:47:47.2: ref_mag=13.84 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8889 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.37 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.89 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:21:22.26 +19:43:07.9: ref_mag=14.37 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.5156 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:16:12.35 +23:43:14.0: ref_mag=14.89 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.8433 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:18:13.78 +24:10:30.0: 14.01 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:16:02.63 +24:27:29.3: 14.27 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:13:36.34 +20:59:40.3: 14.31 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:35:46.72 +20:54:00.1: 14.43 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.98 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:03:21.32 +24:25:50.6: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:18:13.78 +24:10:30.0: ref_mag=13.98 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.3220 delta=-0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.30 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.36 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.42 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:16:02.63 +24:27:29.3: ref_mag=14.30 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.2891 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:35:46.72 +20:54:00.1: ref_mag=14.36 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.3868 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:13:36.34 +20:59:40.3: ref_mag=14.42 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.5152 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.90 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:03:21.32 +24:25:50.6: ref_mag=13.90 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.9645 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:30:18.61 +18:26:46.4: 13.49 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:30:18.61 +18:26:46.4: 13.52 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.50 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:30:18.61 +18:26:46.4: ref_mag=13.50 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.8221 delta=-0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:25:02.65 +23:47:10.8: 13.70 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:36:44.94 +21:03:12.5: 13.28 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:02:58.89 +25:26:06.5: 11.67 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:25:02.65 +23:47:10.8: 13.76 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.73 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:25:02.65 +23:47:10.8: ref_mag=13.73 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6806 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:36:44.94 +21:03:12.5: 13.32 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.30 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:36:44.94 +21:03:12.5: ref_mag=13.30 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2808 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:02:58.89 +25:26:06.5: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.67 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:02:58.89 +25:26:06.5: ref_mag=11.67 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7680 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:13:28.63 +22:22:56.5: 16.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:32:52.93 +23:07:51.1: 16.19 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:34:25.76 +18:02:23.2: 13.36 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:13:28.63 +22:22:56.5: 16.13 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:28:00.94 +18:00:29.7: 15.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:32:52.93 +23:07:51.1: 16.25 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:34:25.76 +18:02:23.2: 13.54 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.44 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:34:25.76 +18:02:23.2: ref_mag=13.44 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5664 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:31:27.88 +24:22:23.2: 13.63 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:28:00.94 +18:00:29.7: 15.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:31:27.88 +24:22:23.2: 13.35 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.46 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:31:27.88 +24:22:23.2: ref_mag=13.46 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6584 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:29:33.19 +20:12:14.3: 13.70 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:25:54.51 +22:07:18.9: 13.81 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:29:33.19 +20:12:14.3: 13.81 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.75 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:29:33.19 +20:12:14.3: ref_mag=13.75 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7668 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:09:29.52 +17:38:59.0: 13.37 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:25:54.51 +22:07:18.9: 13.60 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.68 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:25:54.51 +22:07:18.9: ref_mag=13.68 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7087 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:13:12.04 +26:11:50.5: 13.95 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:09:29.52 +17:38:59.0: 13.60 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.47 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:09:29.52 +17:38:59.0: ref_mag=13.47 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8761 delta=-0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:13:12.04 +26:11:50.5: 13.84 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:19:40.21 +21:05:53.6: 13.51 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.89 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:13:12.04 +26:11:50.5: ref_mag=13.89 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.9394 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:21:05.43 +26:09:24.6: 13.83 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:19:40.21 +21:05:53.6: 13.70 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.58 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:19:40.21 +21:05:53.6: ref_mag=13.58 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8883 delta=-0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:21:05.43 +26:09:24.6: 13.98 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.89 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:21:05.43 +26:09:24.6: ref_mag=13.89 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0000 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:39:25.66 +21:29:24.8: 14.19 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:11:58.98 +22:30:35.7: 13.42 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:38:42.24 +20:50:44.0: 14.13 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:39:25.66 +21:29:24.8: 13.92 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:18:39.10 +25:35:47.5: 13.86 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.00 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:39:25.66 +21:29:24.8: ref_mag=14.00 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0670 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:34:18.62 +22:03:20.7: 14.09 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:11:58.98 +22:30:35.7: 13.66 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.52 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:11:58.98 +22:30:35.7: ref_mag=13.52 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8882 delta=-0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:38:42.24 +20:50:44.0: 14.16 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.15 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:38:42.24 +20:50:44.0: ref_mag=14.15 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.1015 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:18:39.10 +25:35:47.5: 14.04 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.94 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:18:39.10 +25:35:47.5: ref_mag=13.94 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0680 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:35:50.48 +20:50:48.9: 16.17 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:34:18.62 +22:03:20.7: 13.93 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.99 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:34:18.62 +22:03:20.7: ref_mag=13.99 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.1678 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:35:50.48 +20:50:48.9: 16.17 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:38:24.57 +21:35:17.3: 14.32 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:32:18.26 +23:04:11.9: 16.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:25:40.72 +24:58:29.3: 14.29 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:38:24.57 +21:35:17.3: 14.28 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.30 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:32:18.26 +23:04:11.9: 16.20 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:38:24.57 +21:35:17.3: ref_mag=14.30 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.2191 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:15:38.36 +19:51:30.1: 13.94 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:34:56.19 +23:55:39.3: 14.21 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:25:40.72 +24:58:29.3: 14.33 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.31 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:25:40.72 +24:58:29.3: ref_mag=14.31 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.3321 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:15:38.36 +19:51:30.1: 13.95 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.95 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:15:38.36 +19:51:30.1: ref_mag=13.95 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9615 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:34:56.19 +23:55:39.3: 14.28 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.24 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:34:56.19 +23:55:39.3: ref_mag=14.24 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.3362 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:20:02.72 +20:49:59.4: 13.91 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:20:02.72 +20:49:59.4: 13.91 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.91 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:20:02.72 +20:49:59.4: ref_mag=13.91 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0616 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:13:16.13 +25:08:54.1: 14.20 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:36:29.33 +18:19:45.1: 14.33 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:31:13.40 +21:02:55.4: 14.43 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:13:16.13 +25:08:54.1: 14.20 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.20 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:13:16.13 +25:08:54.1: ref_mag=14.20 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.3333 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:35:18.74 +25:39:24.4: 16.07 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:36:29.33 +18:19:45.1: 14.51 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.40 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:36:29.33 +18:19:45.1: ref_mag=14.40 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.5255 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:36:54.21 +21:17:43.4: 16.07 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:31:13.40 +21:02:55.4: 14.44 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.44 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:35:18.74 +25:39:24.4: 15.98 +/- 0.33 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:31:13.40 +21:02:55.4: ref_mag=14.44 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.6052 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.98 +/- 0.33
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 07:35:18.74 +25:39:24.4: ref_mag=15.98 +/- 0.33 new_mean_mag=14.5059 delta=1.48 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:36:54.21 +21:17:43.4: 16.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:33:21.05 +20:35:44.1: 14.83 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:33:21.05 +20:35:44.1: 14.74 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:40:55.50 +21:39:25.6: 15.09 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.78 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:33:21.05 +20:35:44.1: ref_mag=14.78 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.6851 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:40:55.50 +21:39:25.6: 15.52 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.22 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:40:55.50 +21:39:25.6: ref_mag=15.22 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.6643 delta=0.56 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:31:58.79 +22:21:21.3: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:31:58.79 +22:21:21.3: 16.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:16:02.29 +25:06:03.5: 14.32 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:16:02.29 +25:06:03.5: 14.45 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:29:35.96 +22:40:07.0: 14.94 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.38 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:16:02.29 +25:06:03.5: ref_mag=14.38 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.6133 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:29:35.96 +22:40:07.0: 15.12 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.02 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:29:35.96 +22:40:07.0: ref_mag=15.02 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.7787 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:09:43.10 +23:11:41.9: 14.84 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:28:48.67 +24:15:59.3: 15.17 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:19:57.80 +21:05:46.9: 15.04 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:09:43.10 +23:11:41.9: 14.93 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.88 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:09:43.10 +23:11:41.9: ref_mag=14.88 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.8253 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:28:48.67 +24:15:59.3: 15.38 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.26 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:28:48.67 +24:15:59.3: ref_mag=15.26 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.8556 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:19:57.80 +21:05:46.9: 15.09 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.07 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:19:57.80 +21:05:46.9: ref_mag=15.07 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.8255 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out195650.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out195677.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out195694.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out195851.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out195888.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out196014.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out196015.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out196081.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 12s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 6s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195461_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034
The candidate 195461_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:20:57.32 +25:04:51.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195466_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034
The candidate 195466_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195471_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034
The candidate 195471_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195474_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034
The candidate 195474_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195485_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034
The candidate 195485_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195486_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034
The candidate 195486_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195494_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034
The candidate 195494_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195504_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034
The candidate 195504_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195515_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034
The candidate 195515_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195518_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034
The candidate 195518_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195521_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034
The candidate 195521_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:18:22.84 +17:52:05.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195523_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034
The candidate 195523_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195529_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034
The candidate 195529_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195541_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034
The candidate 195541_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195545_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034
The candidate 195545_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195548_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034
Preparing report for the candidate 195548_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195549_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034
Preparing report for the candidate 195549_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195578_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034
The candidate 195578_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:19.26 +24:07:15.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195585_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034
The candidate 195585_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:25.16 +22:38:50.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195592_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034
The candidate 195592_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195607_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034
The candidate 195607_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:25.38 +25:56:20.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195608_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034
The candidate 195608_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:27:42.17 +22:10:17.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195611_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034
The candidate 195611_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195613_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034
The candidate 195613_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:42.51 +21:18:41.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195618_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034
The candidate 195618_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195619_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034
The candidate 195619_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:32:08.81 +23:56:51.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195629_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034
The candidate 195629_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:11:55.66 +22:17:42.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195632_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034
The candidate 195632_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195634_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034
The candidate 195634_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195635_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034
The candidate 195635_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:13:51.15 +17:46:45.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195638_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034
The candidate 195638_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:15.35 +21:47:42.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195640_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034
The candidate 195640_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:31:54.36 +24:32:04.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195643_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034
The candidate 195643_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:55.45 +21:31:09.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195648_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034
The candidate 195648_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:50.91 +18:51:19.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195650_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034
Preparing report for the candidate 195650_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195653_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034
The candidate 195653_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195657_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034
The candidate 195657_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:41:33.16 +18:14:36.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195661_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034
The candidate 195661_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:20:30.48 +20:05:39.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195667_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034
The candidate 195667_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:22.49 +20:30:18.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195670_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034
The candidate 195670_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:23:41.18 +21:33:52.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195673_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034
The candidate 195673_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:20.32 +24:08:06.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195677_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034
Preparing report for the candidate 195677_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195686_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034
The candidate 195686_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195687_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034
The candidate 195687_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:14:40.59 +20:31:55.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195689_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034
The candidate 195689_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:25:02.75 +19:56:33.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195694_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034
Preparing report for the candidate 195694_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195701_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034
The candidate 195701_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:22:13.60 +22:40:18.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195706_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034
The candidate 195706_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:27:03.69 +20:16:03.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195710_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034
The candidate 195710_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:09.63 +19:03:39.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195711_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034
The candidate 195711_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195717_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034
The candidate 195717_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:19:55.81 +20:49:18.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195719_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034
The candidate 195719_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:22.89 +18:10:10.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195724_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034
The candidate 195724_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:38:26.64 +21:32:36.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195725_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034
The candidate 195725_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:27:24.66 +19:09:58.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195726_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034
The candidate 195726_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:31:02.54 +25:10:29.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195729_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034
The candidate 195729_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:10:01.69 +21:27:59.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195730_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034
The candidate 195730_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:11.07 +20:06:30.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195736_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034
The candidate 195736_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195737_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034
The candidate 195737_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:24:29.44 +18:53:46.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195739_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034
The candidate 195739_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:10:22.66 +20:00:48.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195740_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034
The candidate 195740_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:32:27.71 +22:47:24.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195743_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034
The candidate 195743_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195746_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034
The candidate 195746_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:40.79 +21:21:31.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195755_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034
The candidate 195755_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:31:25.69 +17:43:24.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195763_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034
The candidate 195763_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195764_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034
The candidate 195764_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:15.77 +25:49:11.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195768_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034
The candidate 195768_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195775_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034
The candidate 195775_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:27:31.06 +19:26:16.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195776_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034
The candidate 195776_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195779_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034
The candidate 195779_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:24:12.02 +21:26:26.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195780_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034
The candidate 195780_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195782_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034
The candidate 195782_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195783_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034
The candidate 195783_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195784_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034
The candidate 195784_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:30:28.14 +25:27:46.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195786_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034
The candidate 195786_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:29:33.78 +23:02:48.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195787_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034
The candidate 195787_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195801_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034
The candidate 195801_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195802_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034
The candidate 195802_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:08:42.47 +20:49:20.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195820_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034
The candidate 195820_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:22.29 +21:31:48.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195822_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034
The candidate 195822_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195829_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034
The candidate 195829_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195836_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034
The candidate 195836_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195839_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034
The candidate 195839_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:11:01.51 +18:18:03.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195840_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034
The candidate 195840_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:11:16.13 +20:09:10.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195841_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034
The candidate 195841_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195843_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034
The candidate 195843_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:22.37 +21:13:57.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195851_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034
Preparing report for the candidate 195851_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195852_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034
The candidate 195852_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195855_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034
The candidate 195855_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:14:39.41 +25:20:31.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195861_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034
The candidate 195861_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195868_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034
The candidate 195868_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:20:22.90 +19:59:39.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195873_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034
The candidate 195873_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:11:39.80 +20:41:33.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195881_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034
The candidate 195881_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195888_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034
Preparing report for the candidate 195888_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195897_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034
The candidate 195897_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:10:10.83 +18:56:50.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195902_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034
The candidate 195902_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:04.79 +23:31:30.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195912_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034
The candidate 195912_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195914_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034
The candidate 195914_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195915_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034
The candidate 195915_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:21:31.07 +25:14:46.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195916_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034
The candidate 195916_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195922_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034
The candidate 195922_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195927_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034
The candidate 195927_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:15:08.14 +21:35:22.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195938_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034
The candidate 195938_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195951_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034
The candidate 195951_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:19:00.24 +20:18:06.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195967_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034
The candidate 195967_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195970_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034
The candidate 195970_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195979_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034
The candidate 195979_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195995_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034
The candidate 195995_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:26.81 +17:57:02.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195999_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034
The candidate 195999_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196003_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034
The candidate 196003_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196014_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034
Preparing report for the candidate 196014_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196015_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034
Preparing report for the candidate 196015_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196018_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034
The candidate 196018_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:22:05.60 +19:15:46.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196037_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034
The candidate 196037_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196053_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034
The candidate 196053_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:30:13.38 +22:10:39.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196055_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034
The candidate 196055_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196081_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034
Preparing report for the candidate 196081_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196083_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034
The candidate 196083_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196089_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034
The candidate 196089_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196105_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034
The candidate 196105_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196115_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034
The candidate 196115_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196119_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034
The candidate 196119_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 165521_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034
The candidate 165521_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_22-32-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0034 did not pass the final checks
