This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_233353_TTUQ2b1x1_3601842_MeGrmqA9
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 09.1678 2461169.6678 13.90 07:54:23.95 +29:19:54.5
191.57375 25.71231 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 8.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.432 Pythia -1 -0 1 14.3 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 07:54:23.95 +29:19:54.5: 16.23 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 07:54:23.95 +29:19:54.5: 16.23 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461169.6678,13.90,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260509.1678 13.90CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 09.1678 2461169.6678 13.91 07:52:40.68 +33:02:27.7
187.50821 26.46245 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.4" and 8.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.751 Faina -1 -1 1 14.4 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 07:52:40.68 +33:02:27.7: 16.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 07:52:40.68 +33:02:27.7: 16.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461169.6678,13.91,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260509.1678 13.91CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 09.1678 2461169.6678 14.78 08:17:20.90 +30:23:58.1
192.04038 30.78367 galactic Cnc Second-epoch detections are separated by 4.1" and 8.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.519 Sylvania -2 -1 2 15.2 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:17:20.90 +30:23:58.1: 16.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:17:20.90 +30:23:58.1: 16.10 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461169.6678,14.78,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260509.1678 14.78CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 09.1678 2461169.6678 14.60 08:11:35.83 +30:31:26.4
191.51481 29.62388 galactic Cnc Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 8.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.186 Celuta -1 -1 2 14.5 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:11:35.83 +30:31:26.4: 16.23 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:11:35.83 +30:31:26.4: 16.19 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461169.6678,14.60,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260509.1678 14.60CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461119.66450689 20.03.2026 03:56:43.395 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
First image: 2461119.66450689 20.03.2026 03:56:43.395 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
Last image: 2461169.66815890 09.05.2026 04:01:58.929 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_233353_TTUQ2b1x1_3601842_MeGrmqA9/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 3
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.58
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 9839
Objects passed selection criteria: 9824
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 8860
Average stars matched: 8684.5 (98.0192 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 116520 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed May 6 12:14:36 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-43-g0c21e0c3
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri May 8 23:36:13 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461119.66450689 20.03.2026 03:56:43.395 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
First image: 2461119.66450689 20.03.2026 03:56:43.395 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
Last image: 2461169.66815890 09.05.2026 04:01:58.929 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_233353_TTUQ2b1x1_3601842_MeGrmqA9/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 121
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.23
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 32 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 59185
Objects passed selection criteria: 59042
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 55059.8
Average stars matched: 53454 (97.0836 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 163760 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed May 6 12:14:36 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-43-g0c21e0c3
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri May 8 23:38:13 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_233353_TTUQ2b1x1_3601842_MeGrmqA9/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_233353_TTUQ2b1x1_3601842_MeGrmqA9/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_233353_TTUQ2b1x1_3601842_MeGrmqA9/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_233353_TTUQ2b1x1_3601842_MeGrmqA9/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461169.66750307
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits'
wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits'
wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits'
wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 08:00:08.031 +30:01:52.45 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 08:00:00.017 +30:00:17.23 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 08:00:08.031 +30:01:52.45
Second-epoch image center 08:00:00.017 +30:00:17.23
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0392 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:59:56.378 +30:00:23.77 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 08:00:08.031 +30:01:52.45
Second-epoch image center 07:59:56.378 +30:00:23.77
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0487 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 08:00:00.017 +30:00:17.23
Second-epoch second image center 07:59:56.378 +30:00:23.77
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01325 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits &> /tmp/tmp.0i2QulUn6j
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Vx1I2vNNVI
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_233353_TTUQ2b1x1_3601842_MeGrmqA9/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits &> /tmp/tmp.yVLkhzcF6K
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_233353_TTUQ2b1x1_3601842_MeGrmqA9/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_233353_TTUQ2b1x1_3601842_MeGrmqA9/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ASq0DdDjyq
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_233353_TTUQ2b1x1_3601842_MeGrmqA9/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits and wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits and wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits and wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 14578 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 110.6193 to 129.5920 deg, Dec +24.4232 to +35.3035 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 110.6193 to 129.5920 deg, Dec 24.4232 to 35.3035 deg
Loaded 9467 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7183 out of 7679 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7679 out of 14578 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.915000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.915000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.58
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.33
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.33
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 14578 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 110.6193 to 129.5920 deg, Dec +24.4232 to +35.3035 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 110.6193 to 129.5920 deg, Dec 24.4232 to 35.3035 deg
Loaded 9467 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7183 out of 7679 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7679 out of 14578 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits (aperture=6.5)
Read 14611 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 110.6189 to 129.5920 deg, Dec +24.4256 to +35.3044 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 110.6189 to 129.5920 deg, Dec 24.4256 to 35.3044 deg
Loaded 9463 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7187 out of 7676 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7676 out of 14611 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits (aperture=6.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 2 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.4 pix Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
2.3 pix Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
2.5 pix fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits
2.5 pix fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059.fits
2.4 pix wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
15.3 mag. Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
14.9 mag. fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits
14.9 mag. fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.9 (SNR ) 12.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.0i2QulUn6j (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_233353_TTUQ2b1x1_3601842_MeGrmqA9/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1032, passed=14578
Got 14578 stars (including 13536 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14578 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 969 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14452 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14452 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14452 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Excluding outliers - 976 stars left (next iteration limit 1073)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits -region wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Vx1I2vNNVI (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_233353_TTUQ2b1x1_3601842_MeGrmqA9/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1022, passed=14611
Got 14611 stars (including 13580 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14611 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 967 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14488 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14487 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14487 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Excluding outliers - 976 stars left (next iteration limit 1073)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits -region wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.yVLkhzcF6K (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_233353_TTUQ2b1x1_3601842_MeGrmqA9/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_233353_TTUQ2b1x1_3601842_MeGrmqA9/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_233353_TTUQ2b1x1_3601842_MeGrmqA9/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_233353_TTUQ2b1x1_3601842_MeGrmqA9/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_233353_TTUQ2b1x1_3601842_MeGrmqA9/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_233353_TTUQ2b1x1_3601842_MeGrmqA9/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_233353_TTUQ2b1x1_3601842_MeGrmqA9/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_233353_TTUQ2b1x1_3601842_MeGrmqA9/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=603, passed=10468
Got 10468 stars (including 9860 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10468 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 964 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10393 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10394 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10394 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Excluding outliers - 972 stars left (next iteration limit 1069)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_233353_TTUQ2b1x1_3601842_MeGrmqA9/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ASq0DdDjyq (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_233353_TTUQ2b1x1_3601842_MeGrmqA9/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_233353_TTUQ2b1x1_3601842_MeGrmqA9/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_233353_TTUQ2b1x1_3601842_MeGrmqA9/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_233353_TTUQ2b1x1_3601842_MeGrmqA9/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_233353_TTUQ2b1x1_3601842_MeGrmqA9/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_233353_TTUQ2b1x1_3601842_MeGrmqA9/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_233353_TTUQ2b1x1_3601842_MeGrmqA9/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_233353_TTUQ2b1x1_3601842_MeGrmqA9/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=644, passed=10462
Got 10462 stars (including 9807 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10462 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 961 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10382 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10381 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10381 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Excluding outliers - 969 stars left (next iteration limit 1065)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_233353_TTUQ2b1x1_3601842_MeGrmqA9/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_233353_TTUQ2b1x1_3601842_MeGrmqA9/wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_233353_TTUQ2b1x1_3601842_MeGrmqA9/wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-02-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:24:15.96 +30:12:34.1: 12.32 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:10:07.14 +28:56:33.1: 11.27 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:24:15.96 +30:12:34.1: 12.32 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:10:07.14 +28:56:33.1: 11.27 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.27 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.32 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:10:07.14 +28:56:33.1: ref_mag=11.27 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.4930 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:24:15.96 +30:12:34.1: ref_mag=12.32 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2976 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20555_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059
The candidate 20555_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20656_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059
The candidate 20656_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059 did not pass the final checks
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Gem-02-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_233353_TTUQ2b1x1_3601842_MeGrmqA9/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_233353_TTUQ2b1x1_3601842_MeGrmqA9/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_233353_TTUQ2b1x1_3601842_MeGrmqA9/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_233353_TTUQ2b1x1_3601842_MeGrmqA9/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 08:00:08.031 +30:01:52.45 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 08:00:00.017 +30:00:17.23 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 08:00:08.031 +30:01:52.45
Second-epoch image center 08:00:00.017 +30:00:17.23
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0392 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:59:56.378 +30:00:23.77 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 08:00:08.031 +30:01:52.45
Second-epoch image center 07:59:56.378 +30:00:23.77
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0487 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 08:00:00.017 +30:00:17.23
Second-epoch second image center 07:59:56.378 +30:00:23.77
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01325 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits &> /tmp/tmp.yAtREtP5fF
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits &> /tmp/tmp.LGQet2lIj5
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_233353_TTUQ2b1x1_3601842_MeGrmqA9/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits &> /tmp/tmp.PojFcAtKje
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_233353_TTUQ2b1x1_3601842_MeGrmqA9/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_233353_TTUQ2b1x1_3601842_MeGrmqA9/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059.fits &> /tmp/tmp.wwNEhzV1rj
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_233353_TTUQ2b1x1_3601842_MeGrmqA9/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits and wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits and wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits and wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 84052 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 110.6085 to 129.6414 deg, Dec +24.4232 to +35.3079 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 110.6085 to 129.6414 deg, Dec 24.4232 to 35.3079 deg
Loaded 9496 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6463 out of 7799 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7799 out of 84052 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.776500
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.776500
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.23
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.55
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.55
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 84052 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 110.6085 to 129.6414 deg, Dec +24.4232 to +35.3079 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 110.6085 to 129.6414 deg, Dec 24.4232 to 35.3079 deg
Loaded 9496 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6463 out of 7799 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7799 out of 84052 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits (aperture=4.9)
Read 84140 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 110.6089 to 129.6124 deg, Dec +24.4256 to +35.3113 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 110.6089 to 129.6124 deg, Dec 24.4256 to 35.3113 deg
Loaded 9485 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6460 out of 7793 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7793 out of 84140 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits (aperture=4.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 85 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
2.1 pix Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
2.2 pix fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits
2.2 pix fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
15.5 mag. Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
15.1 mag. fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits
15.1 mag. fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.1 (SNR ) 14.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.yAtREtP5fF (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_233353_TTUQ2b1x1_3601842_MeGrmqA9/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=32, blended=6475, passed=84020
Got 84020 stars (including 77437 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 84020 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 959 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 83150 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 83152 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 83152 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Excluding outliers - 972 stars left (next iteration limit 1069)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits -region wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.LGQet2lIj5 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_233353_TTUQ2b1x1_3601842_MeGrmqA9/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=30, blended=6514, passed=84110
Got 84110 stars (including 77507 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 84110 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 958 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 83116 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 83115 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 83115 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 975 stars left (next iteration limit 1072)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits -region wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.PojFcAtKje (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_233353_TTUQ2b1x1_3601842_MeGrmqA9/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_233353_TTUQ2b1x1_3601842_MeGrmqA9/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_233353_TTUQ2b1x1_3601842_MeGrmqA9/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_233353_TTUQ2b1x1_3601842_MeGrmqA9/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_233353_TTUQ2b1x1_3601842_MeGrmqA9/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_233353_TTUQ2b1x1_3601842_MeGrmqA9/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_233353_TTUQ2b1x1_3601842_MeGrmqA9/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_233353_TTUQ2b1x1_3601842_MeGrmqA9/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=22, blended=3468, passed=60533
Got 60533 stars (including 56997 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 60533 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 961 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 60139 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 60139 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 60140 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Excluding outliers - 969 stars left (next iteration limit 1065)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_233353_TTUQ2b1x1_3601842_MeGrmqA9/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.wwNEhzV1rj (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_233353_TTUQ2b1x1_3601842_MeGrmqA9/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_233353_TTUQ2b1x1_3601842_MeGrmqA9/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_233353_TTUQ2b1x1_3601842_MeGrmqA9/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_233353_TTUQ2b1x1_3601842_MeGrmqA9/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_233353_TTUQ2b1x1_3601842_MeGrmqA9/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_233353_TTUQ2b1x1_3601842_MeGrmqA9/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_233353_TTUQ2b1x1_3601842_MeGrmqA9/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_233353_TTUQ2b1x1_3601842_MeGrmqA9/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=3, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=20, blended=3545, passed=60620
Got 60620 stars (including 56998 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 60620 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 963 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 60135 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 60135 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 60136 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Excluding outliers - 968 stars left (next iteration limit 1064)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_233353_TTUQ2b1x1_3601842_MeGrmqA9/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_233353_TTUQ2b1x1_3601842_MeGrmqA9/wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_233353_TTUQ2b1x1_3601842_MeGrmqA9/wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-02-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:02:30.31 +28:57:25.8: 14.43 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:15:09.19 +27:59:00.6: 12.44 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:01:27.12 +29:21:03.0: 14.42 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 07:44:23.53 +31:53:56.7: 13.98 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:05:02.50 +29:16:27.0: 14.89 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:12:28.27 +32:58:18.6: 13.35 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:02:30.31 +28:57:25.8: 14.34 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.38 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:05:02.50 +29:16:27.0: 14.89 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:02:30.31 +28:57:25.8: ref_mag=14.38 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.6956 delta=-0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:01:27.12 +29:21:03.0: 14.49 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.89 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:05:02.50 +29:16:27.0: ref_mag=14.89 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.8585 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.46 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:01:27.12 +29:21:03.0: ref_mag=14.46 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.9144 delta=-0.46 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:12:28.27 +32:58:18.6: 13.23 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:15:09.19 +27:59:00.6: 12.46 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.28 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.45 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:12:28.27 +32:58:18.6: ref_mag=13.28 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.8354 delta=-0.55 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:15:09.19 +27:59:00.6: ref_mag=12.45 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.6896 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 07:44:23.53 +31:53:56.7: 14.09 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.03 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:44:23.53 +31:53:56.7: ref_mag=14.03 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.3706 delta=-0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:28:40.97 +28:18:40.4: 12.93 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:11:46.30 +25:57:30.5: 12.84 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:28:40.97 +28:18:40.4: 12.92 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.92 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:28:40.97 +28:18:40.4: ref_mag=12.92 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1501 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:11:46.30 +25:57:30.5: 12.86 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.85 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:11:46.30 +25:57:30.5: ref_mag=12.85 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.2854 delta=-0.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:20:47.85 +26:57:38.4: 13.99 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:19:26.80 +30:13:15.4: 13.94 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:25:51.88 +30:48:18.9: 13.85 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:13:11.84 +25:45:35.0: 13.73 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:20:47.85 +26:57:38.4: 14.01 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.00 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:20:47.85 +26:57:38.4: ref_mag=14.00 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9270 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:19:26.80 +30:13:15.4: 13.79 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.86 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:19:26.80 +30:13:15.4: ref_mag=13.86 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.9533 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:25:51.88 +30:48:18.9: 13.90 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.87 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:25:51.88 +30:48:18.9: ref_mag=13.87 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0177 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:13:11.84 +25:45:35.0: 13.70 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.72 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:13:11.84 +25:45:35.0: ref_mag=13.72 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.9274 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 07:54:23.95 +29:19:54.5: 16.23 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:14:33.33 +25:57:41.6: 13.92 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 07:48:14.36 +32:40:36.1: 14.00 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 07:41:21.81 +32:04:18.1: 14.06 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 07:54:23.95 +29:19:54.5: 16.23 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:16:36.37 +29:15:46.1: 13.97 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:30:22.14 +28:17:45.1: 14.13 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:21:02.03 +27:22:08.2: 14.41 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:14:33.33 +25:57:41.6: 14.02 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 07:48:14.36 +32:40:36.1: 13.94 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.97 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:14:33.33 +25:57:41.6: ref_mag=13.97 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.1879 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.97 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:48:14.36 +32:40:36.1: ref_mag=13.97 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.0164 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 07:52:40.68 +33:02:27.7: 16.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 07:41:21.81 +32:04:18.1: 13.85 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.94 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:41:21.81 +32:04:18.1: ref_mag=13.94 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0289 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:16:36.37 +29:15:46.1: 14.18 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.06 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:16:36.37 +29:15:46.1: ref_mag=14.06 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.1336 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:30:22.14 +28:17:45.1: 14.20 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.17 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:30:22.14 +28:17:45.1: ref_mag=14.17 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.1985 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:21:02.03 +27:22:08.2: 14.22 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.30 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:21:02.03 +27:22:08.2: ref_mag=14.30 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.2305 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 07:52:40.68 +33:02:27.7: 16.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:06:55.41 +31:33:30.7: 13.92 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:30:25.21 +28:50:26.2: 14.39 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:06:37.18 +33:53:28.6: 14.35 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 07:42:52.67 +29:50:22.4: 14.15 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:06:55.41 +31:33:30.7: 13.87 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.90 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:06:55.41 +31:33:30.7: ref_mag=13.90 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.1769 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:30:25.21 +28:50:26.2: 14.52 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:06:37.18 +33:53:28.6: 14.32 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.44 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.33 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:30:25.21 +28:50:26.2: ref_mag=14.44 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.3682 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:06:37.18 +33:53:28.6: ref_mag=14.33 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.2265 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 07:42:52.67 +29:50:22.4: 14.09 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.12 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:42:52.67 +29:50:22.4: ref_mag=14.12 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.3040 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:28:53.16 +26:32:44.9: 14.97 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 07:57:35.91 +27:28:47.4: 14.35 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:26:27.85 +29:33:12.6: 14.92 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:28:53.16 +26:32:44.9: 14.99 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:11:44.95 +28:59:39.3: 14.84 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 07:57:35.91 +27:28:47.4: 14.31 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.98 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:28:53.16 +26:32:44.9: ref_mag=14.98 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.6491 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.33 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:57:35.91 +27:28:47.4: ref_mag=14.33 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.3469 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:26:27.85 +29:33:12.6: 14.65 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.75 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:17:20.90 +30:23:58.1: 16.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:26:27.85 +29:33:12.6: ref_mag=14.75 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.6284 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:10:28.76 +30:19:55.4: 14.46 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:03:26.17 +31:00:41.7: 14.23 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:11:35.83 +30:31:26.4: 16.23 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:11:44.95 +28:59:39.3: 15.00 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.91 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:11:44.95 +28:59:39.3: ref_mag=14.91 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.6544 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:17:20.90 +30:23:58.1: 16.10 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:10:28.76 +30:19:55.4: 14.37 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.41 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:10:28.76 +30:19:55.4: ref_mag=14.41 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.6548 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:03:26.17 +31:00:41.7: 14.17 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.20 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:03:26.17 +31:00:41.7: ref_mag=14.20 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.6493 delta=-0.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:11:35.83 +30:31:26.4: 16.19 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:25:11.87 +32:40:39.7: 14.83 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:26:50.19 +27:35:31.8: 14.62 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:09:10.92 +27:15:14.3: 14.41 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:26:50.19 +27:35:31.8: 15.03 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:25:11.87 +32:40:39.7: 15.16 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:09:10.92 +27:15:14.3: 14.32 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.94 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.75 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:26:50.19 +27:35:31.8: ref_mag=14.75 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.8151 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:25:11.87 +32:40:39.7: ref_mag=14.94 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.8126 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.36 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:09:10.92 +27:15:14.3: ref_mag=14.36 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.6081 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:31:16.24 +28:31:57.4: 15.00 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:21:44.33 +25:56:25.8: 15.28 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:17:01.09 +26:12:27.3: 15.31 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:31:16.24 +28:31:57.4: 15.20 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.08 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:31:16.24 +28:31:57.4: ref_mag=15.08 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.8912 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:21:44.33 +25:56:25.8: 15.19 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.23 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:17:01.09 +26:12:27.3: 15.21 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:21:44.33 +25:56:25.8: ref_mag=15.23 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.9159 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.25 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:17:01.09 +26:12:27.3: ref_mag=15.25 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.9559 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:10:15.24 +27:21:44.0: 15.06 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:05:31.27 +27:48:49.5: 14.71 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:05:31.27 +27:48:49.5: 14.69 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:10:15.24 +27:21:44.0: 15.40 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.70 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.18 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:05:31.27 +27:48:49.5: ref_mag=14.70 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.8808 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:10:15.24 +27:21:44.0: ref_mag=15.18 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.9740 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out99285.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out99364.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out99614.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out99623.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 10s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98825_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059
The candidate 98825_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98828_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059
The candidate 98828_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98836_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059
The candidate 98836_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98838_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059
The candidate 98838_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:14:44.40 +32:43:45.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98842_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059
The candidate 98842_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98859_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059
The candidate 98859_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98860_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059
The candidate 98860_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:13:49.62 +25:45:38.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98861_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059
The candidate 98861_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:20:26.10 +26:46:28.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98862_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059
The candidate 98862_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98936_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059
The candidate 98936_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:14:29.75 +27:17:27.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98963_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059
The candidate 98963_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:43:57.71 +25:46:40.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98979_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059
The candidate 98979_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:06:15.60 +26:14:19.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99015_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059
The candidate 99015_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:14:34.94 +26:43:05.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99032_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059
The candidate 99032_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:56:12.71 +29:49:10.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99056_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059
The candidate 99056_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99065_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059
The candidate 99065_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:20:12.11 +31:29:35.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99070_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059
The candidate 99070_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:10:16.91 +28:49:14.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99076_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059
The candidate 99076_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:07:05.97 +27:04:17.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99082_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059
The candidate 99082_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99100_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059
The candidate 99100_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:13:42.09 +30:25:07.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99107_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059
The candidate 99107_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:29:50.44 +27:00:50.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99131_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059
The candidate 99131_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:46:57.00 +26:00:36.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99146_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059
The candidate 99146_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:53:12.14 +27:54:07.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99160_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059
The candidate 99160_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:56:13.96 +29:49:32.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99174_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059
The candidate 99174_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:26:54.19 +26:56:12.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99178_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059
The candidate 99178_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:03:06.85 +27:56:46.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99203_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059
The candidate 99203_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:03:55.09 +28:00:59.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99214_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059
The candidate 99214_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:09:48.70 +28:07:51.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99218_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059
The candidate 99218_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:48:42.95 +30:53:35.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99221_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059
The candidate 99221_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99234_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059
The candidate 99234_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:05:40.64 +27:30:25.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99236_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059
The candidate 99236_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99237_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059
The candidate 99237_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:04:48.57 +26:19:35.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99238_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059
The candidate 99238_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99239_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059
The candidate 99239_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99243_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059
The candidate 99243_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:08:26.49 +28:42:58.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99265_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059
The candidate 99265_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:56:56.03 +31:10:01.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99270_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059
The candidate 99270_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:42:47.18 +32:00:05.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99272_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059
The candidate 99272_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:05:30.55 +32:29:47.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99281_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059
The candidate 99281_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:15:54.13 +29:37:48.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99284_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059
The candidate 99284_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:43:28.29 +25:39:06.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99285_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 99285_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99298_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059
The candidate 99298_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:43:38.13 +32:25:52.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99310_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059
The candidate 99310_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99321_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059
The candidate 99321_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99324_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059
The candidate 99324_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:51:51.72 +30:13:37.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99333_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059
The candidate 99333_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99337_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059
The candidate 99337_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:53:34.71 +30:36:43.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99345_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059
The candidate 99345_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99349_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059
The candidate 99349_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:40:34.74 +27:44:22.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99353_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059
The candidate 99353_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99358_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059
The candidate 99358_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99362_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059
The candidate 99362_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:40:22.81 +28:48:29.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99364_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 99364_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99367_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059
The candidate 99367_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:53:10.62 +32:11:06.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99372_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059
The candidate 99372_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:59:22.04 +27:06:00.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99385_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059
The candidate 99385_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99443_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059
The candidate 99443_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:54:34.51 +26:10:07.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99449_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059
The candidate 99449_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:03:07.56 +27:04:22.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99460_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059
The candidate 99460_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99469_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059
The candidate 99469_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99473_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059
The candidate 99473_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99478_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059
The candidate 99478_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:49:03.59 +28:28:07.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99491_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059
The candidate 99491_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:06:28.07 +31:35:11.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99497_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059
The candidate 99497_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:54:53.47 +30:47:35.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99510_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059
The candidate 99510_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:04:07.70 +26:58:37.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99524_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059
The candidate 99524_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99529_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059
The candidate 99529_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99559_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059
The candidate 99559_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99563_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059
The candidate 99563_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:56:54.51 +33:54:05.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99590_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059
The candidate 99590_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:12:46.10 +30:39:07.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99591_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059
The candidate 99591_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99595_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059
The candidate 99595_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99614_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 99614_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99618_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059
The candidate 99618_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99623_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 99623_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99629_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059
The candidate 99629_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99630_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059
The candidate 99630_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99644_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059
The candidate 99644_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99671_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059
The candidate 99671_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99675_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059
The candidate 99675_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99698_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059
The candidate 99698_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99723_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059
The candidate 99723_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99761_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059
The candidate 99761_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34685_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059
The candidate 34685_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_23-01-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0059 did not pass the final checks