This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_224119_TTUQ1b1x1_2283195_YQkT0gvQ
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461169.6528,7.18,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260509.1528 7.18CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461169.6528,7.57,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260509.1528 7.57CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 09.1528 2461169.6528 11.94 07:44:40.20 +23:56:27.1
196.32763 21.85584 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 6.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.40 Harmonia 1 0 1 11.5 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:44:40.20 +23:56:27.1: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:44:40.20 +23:56:27.1: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461169.6528,11.94,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260509.1528 11.94CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461169.6528,7.81,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260509.1528 7.81CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461169.6528,7.84,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260509.1528 7.84CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 09.1528 2461169.6528 13.23 07:13:29.17 +22:22:57.1
194.96878 14.63621 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 6.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.17 Thetis 2 1 2 13.4 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:13:29.17 +22:22:57.1: 16.10 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:13:29.17 +22:22:57.1: 16.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461169.6528,13.23,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260509.1528 13.23CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 09.1528 2461169.6528 13.66 07:32:53.49 +23:07:50.2
196.07031 19.04762 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 6.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.200 Dynamene 2 1 2 13.9 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:32:53.49 +23:07:50.2: 16.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:32:53.49 +23:07:50.2: 16.22 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461169.6528,13.66,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260509.1528 13.66CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 09.1528 2461169.6528 13.72 07:28:01.51 +18:00:29.5
200.54512 15.99270 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 6.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.34 Circe 1 2 2 13.9 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:28:01.51 +18:00:29.5: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:28:01.51 +18:00:29.5: 15.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461169.6528,13.72,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260509.1528 13.72CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 09.1528 2461169.6528 13.92 07:35:50.96 +20:50:49.3
198.57843 18.81047 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 6.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.206 Hersilia 3 -2 4 14.4 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:35:50.96 +20:50:49.3: 16.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:35:50.96 +20:50:49.3: 16.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461169.6528,13.92,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260509.1528 13.92CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 09.1528 2461169.6528 14.12 07:32:18.66 +23:04:12.0
196.07637 18.90112 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.3" and 7.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.133 Cyrene 2 1 2 14.2 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:32:18.66 +23:04:12.0: 16.16 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:32:18.66 +23:04:12.0: 16.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461169.6528,14.12,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260509.1528 14.12CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.73760365 18.01.2026 05:41:58.955 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
First image: 2461058.73760365 18.01.2026 05:41:58.955 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Last image: 2461169.65318083 09.05.2026 03:40:24.824 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_224119_TTUQ1b1x1_2283195_YQkT0gvQ/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 5
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.62
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 7 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 21191
Objects passed selection criteria: 21151
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 18543.8
Average stars matched: 17667.2 (95.2733 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 125696 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed May 6 12:14:36 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-43-g0c21e0c3
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri May 8 22:42:26 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.73760365 18.01.2026 05:41:58.955 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
First image: 2461058.73760365 18.01.2026 05:41:58.955 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Last image: 2461169.65318083 09.05.2026 03:40:24.824 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_224119_TTUQ1b1x1_2283195_YQkT0gvQ/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 125
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.32
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 52 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 140025
Objects passed selection criteria: 139697
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 125648
Average stars matched: 120404 (95.8257 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1967396 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed May 6 12:14:36 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-43-g0c21e0c3
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri May 8 22:45:21 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_224119_TTUQ1b1x1_2283195_YQkT0gvQ/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-39-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_224119_TTUQ1b1x1_2283195_YQkT0gvQ/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_224119_TTUQ1b1x1_2283195_YQkT0gvQ/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-39-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_224119_TTUQ1b1x1_2283195_YQkT0gvQ/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461169.65243182
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits'
wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits'
wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-39-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-39-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-39-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-39-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits'
wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:22:55.118 +21:59:39.20 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-39-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-39-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits
Image size: 941.7'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:21.027 +22:00:25.71 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:22:55.118 +21:59:39.20
Second-epoch image center 07:23:21.027 +22:00:25.71
Angular distance between the image centers 0.1009 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050.fits
Image size: 941.7'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:22.885 +22:00:56.33 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:22:55.118 +21:59:39.20
Second-epoch image center 07:23:22.885 +22:00:56.33
Angular distance between the image centers 0.1094 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:23:21.027 +22:00:25.71
Second-epoch second image center 07:23:22.885 +22:00:56.33
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01113 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits &> /tmp/tmp.eB3hw35Dpb
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits &> /tmp/tmp.J6rOTwYqe3
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_224119_TTUQ1b1x1_2283195_YQkT0gvQ/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-39-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits &> /tmp/tmp.D435EkEKhv
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_224119_TTUQ1b1x1_2283195_YQkT0gvQ/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-39-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_224119_TTUQ1b1x1_2283195_YQkT0gvQ/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050.fits &> /tmp/tmp.38Piiqezvf
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_224119_TTUQ1b1x1_2283195_YQkT0gvQ/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 22550 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 101.7556 to 119.3352 deg, Dec +16.3006 to +27.3458 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 101.7556 to 119.3352 deg, Dec 16.3006 to 27.3458 deg
Loaded 14532 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10648 out of 11733 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11733 out of 22550 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.904800
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.904800
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.62
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.28
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.28
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 22550 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 101.7556 to 119.3352 deg, Dec +16.3006 to +27.3458 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 101.7556 to 119.3352 deg, Dec 16.3006 to 27.3458 deg
Loaded 14532 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10648 out of 11733 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11733 out of 22550 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits (aperture=6.2)
Read 23656 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 102.0351 to 119.5904 deg, Dec +16.4807 to +27.2946 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 102.0351 to 119.5904 deg, Dec 16.4807 to 27.2946 deg
Loaded 13969 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10670 out of 11761 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11761 out of 23656 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits (aperture=6.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 4 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
2.3 pix Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
2.3 pix fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-39-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits
2.3 pix fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
15.3 mag. Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-39-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.6 (SNR ) 11.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.eB3hw35Dpb (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_224119_TTUQ1b1x1_2283195_YQkT0gvQ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2218, passed=22550
Got 22550 stars (including 20300 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 22550 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 954 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 941 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22225 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 954 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22223 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22223 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 953 stars left (next iteration limit 1048)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits -region wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.J6rOTwYqe3 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_224119_TTUQ1b1x1_2283195_YQkT0gvQ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2265, passed=23656
Got 23656 stars (including 21362 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 23656 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 951 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 930 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22858 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 952 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22857 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22857 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 950 stars left (next iteration limit 1045)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits -region wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.D435EkEKhv (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_224119_TTUQ1b1x1_2283195_YQkT0gvQ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_224119_TTUQ1b1x1_2283195_YQkT0gvQ/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-39-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_224119_TTUQ1b1x1_2283195_YQkT0gvQ/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-39-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_224119_TTUQ1b1x1_2283195_YQkT0gvQ/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-39-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_224119_TTUQ1b1x1_2283195_YQkT0gvQ/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-39-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_224119_TTUQ1b1x1_2283195_YQkT0gvQ/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-39-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_224119_TTUQ1b1x1_2283195_YQkT0gvQ/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-39-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-39-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-39-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-39-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-39-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-39-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-39-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-39-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_224119_TTUQ1b1x1_2283195_YQkT0gvQ/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-39-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-39-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1103, passed=14210
Got 14210 stars (including 13093 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-39-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14210 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 935 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13944 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13943 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13942 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Excluding outliers - 942 stars left (next iteration limit 1037)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-39-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-39-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_224119_TTUQ1b1x1_2283195_YQkT0gvQ/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-39-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-39-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-39-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.38Piiqezvf (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_224119_TTUQ1b1x1_2283195_YQkT0gvQ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_224119_TTUQ1b1x1_2283195_YQkT0gvQ/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_224119_TTUQ1b1x1_2283195_YQkT0gvQ/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_224119_TTUQ1b1x1_2283195_YQkT0gvQ/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_224119_TTUQ1b1x1_2283195_YQkT0gvQ/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_224119_TTUQ1b1x1_2283195_YQkT0gvQ/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_224119_TTUQ1b1x1_2283195_YQkT0gvQ/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_224119_TTUQ1b1x1_2283195_YQkT0gvQ/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=5, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1080, passed=14235
Got 14235 stars (including 13144 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14235 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 929 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13898 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13897 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13896 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 942 stars left (next iteration limit 1037)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_224119_TTUQ1b1x1_2283195_YQkT0gvQ/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-39-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-39-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_224119_TTUQ1b1x1_2283195_YQkT0gvQ/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-39-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_224119_TTUQ1b1x1_2283195_YQkT0gvQ/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:44:40.20 +23:56:27.1: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:44:40.20 +23:56:27.1: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out33422.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 6s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33133_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050
Preparing report for the candidate 33133_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33134_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050
Preparing report for the candidate 33134_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33422_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050
Preparing report for the candidate 33422_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14622_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 14622_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:43:02.43 +23:26:56.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 9s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Gem-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
07:44:40.20 +23:56:27.1
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_224119_TTUQ1b1x1_2283195_YQkT0gvQ/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-39-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_224119_TTUQ1b1x1_2283195_YQkT0gvQ/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_224119_TTUQ1b1x1_2283195_YQkT0gvQ/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-39-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_224119_TTUQ1b1x1_2283195_YQkT0gvQ/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-39-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-39-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:22:55.118 +21:59:39.20 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-39-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-39-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits
Image size: 941.7'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:21.027 +22:00:25.71 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:22:55.118 +21:59:39.20
Second-epoch image center 07:23:21.027 +22:00:25.71
Angular distance between the image centers 0.1009 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050.fits
Image size: 941.7'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:22.885 +22:00:56.33 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:22:55.118 +21:59:39.20
Second-epoch image center 07:23:22.885 +22:00:56.33
Angular distance between the image centers 0.1094 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:23:21.027 +22:00:25.71
Second-epoch second image center 07:23:22.885 +22:00:56.33
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01113 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits &> /tmp/tmp.1VTUWJKZiA
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits &> /tmp/tmp.XOjFLsPBcR
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_224119_TTUQ1b1x1_2283195_YQkT0gvQ/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-39-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits &> /tmp/tmp.adMH6ovXNR
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_224119_TTUQ1b1x1_2283195_YQkT0gvQ/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-39-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_224119_TTUQ1b1x1_2283195_YQkT0gvQ/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050.fits &> /tmp/tmp.CyGQrk30CA
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_224119_TTUQ1b1x1_2283195_YQkT0gvQ/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 153680 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 101.7461 to 119.3352 deg, Dec +16.3007 to +27.3487 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 101.7461 to 119.3352 deg, Dec 16.3007 to 27.3487 deg
Loaded 14554 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8811 out of 12036 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12036 out of 153680 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.769600
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.769600
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.32
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.45
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.45
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 153680 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 101.7461 to 119.3352 deg, Dec +16.3007 to +27.3487 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 101.7461 to 119.3352 deg, Dec 16.3007 to 27.3487 deg
Loaded 14554 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8811 out of 12036 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12036 out of 153680 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits (aperture=4.7)
Read 151496 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 102.0337 to 119.6237 deg, Dec +16.4751 to +27.2973 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 102.0337 to 119.6237 deg, Dec 16.4751 to 27.2973 deg
Loaded 14001 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8799 out of 12010 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12010 out of 151496 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits (aperture=4.8)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 117 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
2.1 pix Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
2.1 pix fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-39-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits
2.1 pix fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050.fits
1.9 pix wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
15.4 mag. Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-39-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.8 (SNR ) 14.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.1VTUWJKZiA (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_224119_TTUQ1b1x1_2283195_YQkT0gvQ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=51, blended=17863, passed=153629
Got 153629 stars (including 135492 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 153629 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 941 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 151026 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 151027 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 151027 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 953 stars left (next iteration limit 1048)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits -region wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.XOjFLsPBcR (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_224119_TTUQ1b1x1_2283195_YQkT0gvQ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=46, blended=17705, passed=151450
Got 151450 stars (including 133487 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 151450 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 952 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 935 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 148360 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 952 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 951 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 148361 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 951 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 148362 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 951 stars left (next iteration limit 1047)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits -region wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.adMH6ovXNR (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_224119_TTUQ1b1x1_2283195_YQkT0gvQ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_224119_TTUQ1b1x1_2283195_YQkT0gvQ/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-39-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_224119_TTUQ1b1x1_2283195_YQkT0gvQ/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-39-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_224119_TTUQ1b1x1_2283195_YQkT0gvQ/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-39-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_224119_TTUQ1b1x1_2283195_YQkT0gvQ/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-39-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_224119_TTUQ1b1x1_2283195_YQkT0gvQ/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-39-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_224119_TTUQ1b1x1_2283195_YQkT0gvQ/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-39-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-39-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-39-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-39-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-39-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-39-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-39-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-39-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_224119_TTUQ1b1x1_2283195_YQkT0gvQ/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-39-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-39-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=45, blended=8024, passed=101485
Got 101485 stars (including 93283 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-39-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 101485 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 936 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 100035 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 100035 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 100035 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Excluding outliers - 946 stars left (next iteration limit 1041)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-39-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-39-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_224119_TTUQ1b1x1_2283195_YQkT0gvQ/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-39-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-39-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-39-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.CyGQrk30CA (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_224119_TTUQ1b1x1_2283195_YQkT0gvQ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_224119_TTUQ1b1x1_2283195_YQkT0gvQ/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_224119_TTUQ1b1x1_2283195_YQkT0gvQ/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_224119_TTUQ1b1x1_2283195_YQkT0gvQ/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_224119_TTUQ1b1x1_2283195_YQkT0gvQ/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_224119_TTUQ1b1x1_2283195_YQkT0gvQ/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_224119_TTUQ1b1x1_2283195_YQkT0gvQ/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_224119_TTUQ1b1x1_2283195_YQkT0gvQ/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=22, blended=7785, passed=99631
Got 99631 stars (including 91680 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 99631 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 933 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 98171 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 98171 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 98170 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 945 stars left (next iteration limit 1039)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_224119_TTUQ1b1x1_2283195_YQkT0gvQ/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-39-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_224119_TTUQ1b1x1_2283195_YQkT0gvQ/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-39-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_224119_TTUQ1b1x1_2283195_YQkT0gvQ/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:15:19.93 +26:23:28.3: 14.43 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:54:42.50 +20:59:50.1: 14.64 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 06:53:56.64 +22:10:43.8: 13.86 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:15:13.41 +19:32:29.3: 14.47 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 06:56:07.02 +20:42:25.1: 14.31 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:33:32.41 +19:25:56.3: 14.13 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:34:51.29 +23:48:24.1: 14.52 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 06:55:10.19 +19:46:25.7: 13.50 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:15:19.93 +26:23:28.3: 14.42 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:54:42.50 +20:59:50.1: 14.72 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 06:53:56.64 +22:10:43.8: 13.76 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:15:13.41 +19:32:29.3: 14.65 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.43 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.68 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:15:19.93 +26:23:28.3: ref_mag=14.43 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.3420 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:54:42.50 +20:59:50.1: ref_mag=14.68 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.4334 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.81 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.55 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:53:56.64 +22:10:43.8: ref_mag=13.81 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9216 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:15:13.41 +19:32:29.3: ref_mag=14.55 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.5143 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 06:56:07.02 +20:42:25.1: 13.96 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:34:51.29 +23:48:24.1: 14.52 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:33:32.41 +19:25:56.3: 14.16 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.09 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.52 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:56:07.02 +20:42:25.1: ref_mag=14.09 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.2032 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.15 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:34:51.29 +23:48:24.1: ref_mag=14.52 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.5370 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:33:32.41 +19:25:56.3: ref_mag=14.15 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.2425 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 06:55:10.19 +19:46:25.7: 13.44 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.47 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:55:10.19 +19:46:25.7: ref_mag=13.47 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8045 delta=-0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:05:26.73 +23:57:43.2: 12.86 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:21:54.91 +25:39:56.0: 13.14 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 06:57:08.11 +20:04:09.7: 12.62 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:05:26.73 +23:57:43.2: 12.92 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.88 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:05:26.73 +23:57:43.2: ref_mag=12.88 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.3053 delta=-0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:21:54.91 +25:39:56.0: 13.20 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.17 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:21:54.91 +25:39:56.0: ref_mag=13.17 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2359 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 06:57:08.11 +20:04:09.7: 12.53 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.57 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:57:08.11 +20:04:09.7: ref_mag=12.57 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.8001 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:13:29.17 +22:22:57.1: 16.10 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:13:29.17 +22:22:57.1: 16.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 06:55:13.21 +17:59:16.4: 13.90 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:27:20.62 +16:50:55.0: 13.62 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:32:53.49 +23:07:50.2: 16.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 06:51:30.50 +19:39:12.0: 13.51 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 06:55:13.21 +17:59:16.4: 13.72 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.80 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:55:13.21 +17:59:16.4: ref_mag=13.80 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.4607 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:28:01.51 +18:00:29.5: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:27:20.62 +16:50:55.0: 13.87 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:32:53.49 +23:07:50.2: 16.22 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.72 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:27:20.62 +16:50:55.0: ref_mag=13.72 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6275 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 06:51:30.50 +19:39:12.0: 13.65 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.57 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:51:30.50 +19:39:12.0: ref_mag=13.57 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6307 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:28:01.51 +18:00:29.5: 15.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:35:50.96 +20:50:49.3: 16.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:03:28.38 +23:00:18.8: 13.65 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:35:50.96 +20:50:49.3: 16.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:03:28.38 +23:00:18.8: 13.50 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.57 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:03:28.38 +23:00:18.8: ref_mag=13.57 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8012 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:15:38.47 +19:51:29.6: 13.93 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:15:38.47 +19:51:29.6: 13.91 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.92 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:15:38.47 +19:51:29.6: ref_mag=13.92 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8340 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:35:41.90 +23:18:56.4: 13.76 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:13:12.16 +26:11:51.0: 13.93 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:32:18.66 +23:04:12.0: 16.16 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:35:41.90 +23:18:56.4: 13.76 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.76 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:35:41.90 +23:18:56.4: ref_mag=13.76 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.0356 delta=-0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:10:00.35 +23:42:01.1: 13.95 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:13:12.16 +26:11:51.0: 13.81 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.86 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:13:12.16 +26:11:51.0: ref_mag=13.86 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.0064 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:32:18.66 +23:04:12.0: 16.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:10:00.35 +23:42:01.1: 14.01 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.97 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:10:00.35 +23:42:01.1: ref_mag=13.97 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0446 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:38:18.40 +22:13:48.5: 14.04 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:38:18.40 +22:13:48.5: 13.99 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.02 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:38:18.40 +22:13:48.5: ref_mag=14.02 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.1424 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:11:14.56 +24:22:07.1: 14.09 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:09:43.83 +26:37:58.1: 14.28 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:11:14.56 +24:22:07.1: 14.12 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:15:07.95 +21:35:22.5: 16.17 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.10 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:11:14.56 +24:22:07.1: ref_mag=14.10 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.2188 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:09:43.83 +26:37:58.1: 14.40 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.33 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:09:43.83 +26:37:58.1: ref_mag=14.33 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.3462 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:15:07.95 +21:35:22.5: 16.19 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:51:46.23 +26:21:53.6: 14.79 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:22:27.62 +26:45:51.2: 15.42 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:39:38.87 +21:43:56.3: 15.47 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:51:46.23 +26:21:53.6: 15.13 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.92 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:51:46.23 +26:21:53.6: ref_mag=14.92 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.5912 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:45:25.39 +25:17:26.5: 15.22 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:22:27.62 +26:45:51.2: 15.50 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.46 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:22:27.62 +26:45:51.2: ref_mag=15.46 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.6808 delta=0.78 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:39:38.87 +21:43:56.3: 15.57 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.52 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:39:38.87 +21:43:56.3: ref_mag=15.52 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.9110 delta=0.61 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:45:25.39 +25:17:26.5: 15.35 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.28 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:45:25.39 +25:17:26.5: ref_mag=15.28 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.8701 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out183505.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out182174.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out182481.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out182578.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out182618.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out182978.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 10s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181123_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 181123_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181129_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 181129_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181142_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 181142_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181149_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 181149_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181161_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 181161_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181170_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 181170_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181175_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 181175_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:46:35.45 +25:44:00.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181184_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 181184_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:55:15.25 +23:56:39.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181186_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 181186_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181193_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 181193_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181198_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 181198_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:47:06.40 +25:27:40.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181200_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 181200_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181204_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 181204_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:52:40.47 +25:53:23.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181208_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 181208_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:46:20.77 +17:00:51.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181213_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 181213_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:21:05.34 +21:26:56.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181218_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 181218_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:51:25.18 +20:17:00.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181224_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 181224_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:13:05.53 +18:18:49.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181228_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 181228_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:08:21.03 +18:46:55.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181231_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 181231_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:42.93 +23:18:01.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181233_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 181233_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181236_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 181236_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:45:11.37 +25:40:42.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181238_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 181238_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181239_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 181239_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:58:55.86 +26:11:01.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181241_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 181241_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:10:13.51 +23:35:06.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181243_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 181243_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:25.88 +22:06:41.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181245_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 181245_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181249_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 181249_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:21.09 +26:05:37.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181250_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 181250_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:54:09.26 +24:24:59.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181253_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050
Preparing report for the candidate 181253_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181255_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050
Preparing report for the candidate 181255_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181533_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 181533_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:44:40.18 +23:56:27.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181582_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 181582_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:58:38.68 +19:12:53.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181662_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 181662_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:43:14.54 +22:23:12.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181666_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 181666_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:58:40.91 +19:13:20.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181871_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 181871_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:33.05 +24:41:32.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181872_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 181872_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:51:54.38 +23:37:27.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181954_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 181954_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:11:55.71 +22:17:43.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181977_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 181977_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:31:54.29 +24:32:04.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181989_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 181989_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:50.94 +18:51:19.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182020_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 182020_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:01:49.18 +22:03:01.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182081_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 182081_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:55.44 +21:31:10.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182110_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 182110_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:48:28.37 +18:20:30.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182123_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 182123_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:56:25.23 +24:28:02.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182156_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 182156_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:38:21.52 +26:41:46.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182174_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050
Preparing report for the candidate 182174_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182227_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 182227_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:40:31.62 +25:24:01.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182263_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 182263_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:22.12 +23:05:08.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182269_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 182269_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:20:30.57 +20:05:43.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182280_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 182280_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:41:33.12 +18:14:38.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182299_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 182299_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:25:22.54 +24:00:04.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182315_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 182315_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:56:55.62 +20:35:46.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182329_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 182329_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:05.94 +23:59:43.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182364_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 182364_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:55.20 +24:28:14.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182391_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 182391_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:16:47.95 +26:38:49.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182406_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 182406_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:25.17 +26:03:04.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182414_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 182414_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:51:51.97 +25:02:24.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182416_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 182416_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182419_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 182419_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:28.68 +25:50:24.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182423_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 182423_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:58:31.19 +19:14:46.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182437_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 182437_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:31:50.05 +17:03:22.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182463_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 182463_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:53:39.80 +18:21:58.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182481_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050
Preparing report for the candidate 182481_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182482_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 182482_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182499_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 182499_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182509_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 182509_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:22:13.63 +22:40:20.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182571_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 182571_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:01:04.64 +18:53:55.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182578_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050
Preparing report for the candidate 182578_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182583_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 182583_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:52:54.75 +20:22:40.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182595_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 182595_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:51:54.23 +17:40:16.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182618_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050
Preparing report for the candidate 182618_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182649_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 182649_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:09.86 +19:03:39.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182654_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 182654_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:19:55.93 +20:49:18.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182669_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 182669_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182688_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 182688_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:18:39.16 +25:35:48.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182696_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 182696_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:22:37.77 +19:41:15.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182717_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 182717_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:49.75 +17:39:40.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182734_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 182734_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:25:09.96 +25:55:55.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182737_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 182737_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:45.60 +21:44:09.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182770_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 182770_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:33.24 +19:29:53.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182773_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 182773_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:11:16.84 +26:52:11.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182777_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 182777_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:18:03.46 +27:09:21.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182791_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 182791_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:11:01.55 +18:18:03.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182792_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 182792_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:57:41.71 +19:34:19.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182798_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 182798_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182804_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 182804_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:24:22.03 +25:44:37.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182807_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 182807_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:14:56.21 +26:45:57.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182815_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 182815_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:58.51 +26:47:20.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182853_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 182853_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:51:08.74 +20:50:31.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182855_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 182855_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:08:02.26 +26:00:41.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182880_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 182880_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:13.29 +21:35:24.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182884_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 182884_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182921_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 182921_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182930_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 182930_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:14:11.63 +24:02:03.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182939_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 182939_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:04:25.90 +17:50:04.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182978_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050
Preparing report for the candidate 182978_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183001_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 183001_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183009_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 183009_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:02.84 +26:39:45.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183010_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 183010_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:14:39.48 +25:20:33.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183110_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 183110_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:21:09.86 +26:30:50.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183112_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 183112_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:16.31 +17:33:23.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183118_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 183118_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183147_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 183147_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:22.44 +21:13:57.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183153_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 183153_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:03:11.57 +25:56:34.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183158_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 183158_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:16:42.91 +26:01:50.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183258_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 183258_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183287_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 183287_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:14:59.44 +27:10:55.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183382_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 183382_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:11:49.23 +24:26:35.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183439_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 183439_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183505_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 183505_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:15:07.95 +21:35:22.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.40, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.38)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.698 3367162379046057984 108.78332763474 +21.58953744484 14.0206 12.0632 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.698#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183574_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 183574_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:03.68 +24:24:04.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183718_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 183718_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:10:34.96 +22:10:31.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183722_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 183722_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183841_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 183841_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183907_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 183907_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183914_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 183914_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102023_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 102023_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:43:02.44 +23:26:57.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119081_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 119081_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-40-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
