This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_220634_TTUQ1b1x1_396606_YcoNsPvZ
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 09.1285 2461169.6285 13.34 06:41:53.32 +15:44:03.7
197.82403 5.04682 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.1" and 7.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.107 Camilla 4 3 5 13.4 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:41:53.32 +15:44:03.7: 15.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:41:53.32 +15:44:03.7: 15.63 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461169.6285,13.34,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260509.1285 13.34CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 09.1285 2461169.6285 13.48 06:57:23.71 +15:21:03.1
199.84047 8.22253 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 7.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.80 Sappho 1 2 2 13.3 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:57:23.71 +15:21:03.1: 16.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:57:23.71 +15:21:03.1: 15.74 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461169.6285,13.48,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260509.1285 13.48CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 09.1285 2461169.6285 13.64 07:27:59.17 +18:00:32.3
200.54047 15.98454 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.6" and 8.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.34 Circe 2 2 3 13.9 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:27:59.17 +18:00:32.3: 15.81 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:27:59.17 +18:00:32.3: 15.57 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461169.6285,13.64,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260509.1285 13.64CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 09.1285 2461169.6285 13.82 07:23:17.12 +12:50:10.8
204.90651 12.79711 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 7.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.194 Prokne 2 4 4 14.0 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:23:17.12 +12:50:10.8: 15.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:23:17.12 +12:50:10.8: 15.72 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461169.6285,13.82,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260509.1285 13.82CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 09.1285 2461169.6285 14.19 06:49:28.77 +12:45:29.5
201.32362 5.35238 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 8.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.218 Bianca 2 3 3 14.3 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:49:28.77 +12:45:29.5: 15.62 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:49:28.77 +12:45:29.5: 15.45 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461169.6285,14.19,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260509.1285 14.19CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461082.64008763 11.02.2026 03:21:33.571 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
First image: 2461082.64008763 11.02.2026 03:21:33.571 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Last image: 2461169.62900432 09.05.2026 03:05:35.973 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_220634_TTUQ1b1x1_396606_YcoNsPvZ/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 4
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.78
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 9 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 25270
Objects passed selection criteria: 25241
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 22511.5
Average stars matched: 22075.2 (98.0621 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 129400 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed May 6 12:14:36 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-43-g0c21e0c3
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri May 8 22:12:46 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461082.64008763 11.02.2026 03:21:33.571 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
First image: 2461082.64008763 11.02.2026 03:21:33.571 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Last image: 2461169.62900432 09.05.2026 03:05:35.973 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_220634_TTUQ1b1x1_396606_YcoNsPvZ/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 146
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.41
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 112 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 174208
Objects passed selection criteria: 173814
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 159962
Average stars matched: 156160 (97.6233 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 2000852 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed May 6 12:14:36 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-43-g0c21e0c3
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri May 8 22:17:09 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_220634_TTUQ1b1x1_396606_YcoNsPvZ/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-04-12_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_220634_TTUQ1b1x1_396606_YcoNsPvZ/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_220634_TTUQ1b1x1_396606_YcoNsPvZ/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-04-12_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_220634_TTUQ1b1x1_396606_YcoNsPvZ/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461169.62803684
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
'asassn_transients_list.txt' -> '../asassn_transients_list.txt'
'tns_transients_list.txt' -> '../tns_transients_list.txt'
wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits'
wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits'
wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-04-12_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-04-12_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-04-12_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-04-12_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits'
wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:06:41.943 +14:00:23.80 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-04-12_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-04-12_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits
Image size: 941.7'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:06:57.371 +13:59:38.44 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:06:41.943 +14:00:23.80
Second-epoch image center 07:06:57.371 +13:59:38.44
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0636 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits
Image size: 941.7'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:06:54.659 +13:59:13.82 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:06:41.943 +14:00:23.80
Second-epoch image center 07:06:54.659 +13:59:13.82
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0550 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:06:57.371 +13:59:38.44
Second-epoch second image center 07:06:54.659 +13:59:13.82
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01292 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits &> /tmp/tmp.yExNxTwHgs
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits &> /tmp/tmp.KFEsgBGIGD
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_220634_TTUQ1b1x1_396606_YcoNsPvZ/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-04-12_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits &> /tmp/tmp.7fdNBZkxzn
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_220634_TTUQ1b1x1_396606_YcoNsPvZ/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-04-12_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_220634_TTUQ1b1x1_396606_YcoNsPvZ/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits &> /tmp/tmp.hRKUQlrtbe
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_220634_TTUQ1b1x1_396606_YcoNsPvZ/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits and wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits and wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits and wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 28861 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 98.2658 to 114.8194 deg, Dec +8.4660 to +19.3435 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 98.2658 to 114.8194 deg, Dec 8.4660 to 19.3435 deg
Loaded 18981 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 13233 out of 14919 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 14919 out of 28861 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.907000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.907000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.78
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.13
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.13
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 28861 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 98.2658 to 114.8194 deg, Dec +8.4660 to +19.3435 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 98.2658 to 114.8194 deg, Dec 8.4660 to 19.3435 deg
Loaded 18981 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 13233 out of 14919 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 14919 out of 28861 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits (aperture=6.4)
Read 25465 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 98.3423 to 114.8448 deg, Dec +8.5622 to +19.2817 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 98.3423 to 114.8448 deg, Dec 8.5622 to 19.2817 deg
Loaded 18666 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 13861 out of 14947 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 14947 out of 25465 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits (aperture=6.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 3 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
2.5 pix Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
2.6 pix fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-04-12_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits
2.6 pix fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
2.5 pix wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.1 mag. Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
14.9 mag. Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
14.5 mag. fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-04-12_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits
14.5 mag. fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.5 (SNR ) 11.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.yExNxTwHgs (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_220634_TTUQ1b1x1_396606_YcoNsPvZ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=3379, passed=28861
Got 28861 stars (including 25451 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 28861 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 934 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 915 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28178 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 934 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28180 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28159 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Excluding outliers - 933 stars left (next iteration limit 1027)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits -region wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.KFEsgBGIGD (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_220634_TTUQ1b1x1_396606_YcoNsPvZ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=7, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2216, passed=25458
Got 25458 stars (including 23222 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 25458 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 926 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 908 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.66"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25093 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.65"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 926 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25094 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.65"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25095 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.68"
Excluding outliers - 924 stars left (next iteration limit 1016)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits -region wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.7fdNBZkxzn (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_220634_TTUQ1b1x1_396606_YcoNsPvZ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_220634_TTUQ1b1x1_396606_YcoNsPvZ/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-04-12_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_220634_TTUQ1b1x1_396606_YcoNsPvZ/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-04-12_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_220634_TTUQ1b1x1_396606_YcoNsPvZ/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-04-12_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_220634_TTUQ1b1x1_396606_YcoNsPvZ/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-04-12_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_220634_TTUQ1b1x1_396606_YcoNsPvZ/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-04-12_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_220634_TTUQ1b1x1_396606_YcoNsPvZ/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-04-12_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-04-12_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-04-12_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-04-12_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-04-12_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-04-12_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-04-12_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-04-12_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_220634_TTUQ1b1x1_396606_YcoNsPvZ/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-04-12_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-04-12_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1527, passed=18167
Got 18167 stars (including 16621 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-04-12_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 18167 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 917 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 898 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17888 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 916 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17890 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17890 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Excluding outliers - 912 stars left (next iteration limit 1004)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-04-12_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-04-12_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_220634_TTUQ1b1x1_396606_YcoNsPvZ/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-04-12_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-04-12_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-04-12_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.hRKUQlrtbe (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_220634_TTUQ1b1x1_396606_YcoNsPvZ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_220634_TTUQ1b1x1_396606_YcoNsPvZ/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_220634_TTUQ1b1x1_396606_YcoNsPvZ/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_220634_TTUQ1b1x1_396606_YcoNsPvZ/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_220634_TTUQ1b1x1_396606_YcoNsPvZ/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_220634_TTUQ1b1x1_396606_YcoNsPvZ/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_220634_TTUQ1b1x1_396606_YcoNsPvZ/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_220634_TTUQ1b1x1_396606_YcoNsPvZ/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=1, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1514, passed=18149
Got 18149 stars (including 16615 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 18149 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 918 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 900 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17923 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 919 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17925 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17925 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Excluding outliers - 916 stars left (next iteration limit 1007)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_220634_TTUQ1b1x1_396606_YcoNsPvZ/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-04-12_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-04-12_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_220634_TTUQ1b1x1_396606_YcoNsPvZ/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-04-12_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_220634_TTUQ1b1x1_396606_YcoNsPvZ/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30939_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024
The candidate 30939_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:56:07.28 +09:35:39.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31142_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024
The candidate 31142_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:39.30 +10:34:51.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31219_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024
The candidate 31219_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:50:50.48 +19:05:29.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Gem-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_220634_TTUQ1b1x1_396606_YcoNsPvZ/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-04-12_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_220634_TTUQ1b1x1_396606_YcoNsPvZ/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_220634_TTUQ1b1x1_396606_YcoNsPvZ/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-04-12_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_220634_TTUQ1b1x1_396606_YcoNsPvZ/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-04-12_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-04-12_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:06:41.943 +14:00:23.80 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-04-12_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-04-12_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits
Image size: 941.7'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:06:57.371 +13:59:38.44 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:06:41.943 +14:00:23.80
Second-epoch image center 07:06:57.371 +13:59:38.44
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0636 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits
Image size: 941.7'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:06:54.659 +13:59:13.82 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:06:41.943 +14:00:23.80
Second-epoch image center 07:06:54.659 +13:59:13.82
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0550 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:06:57.371 +13:59:38.44
Second-epoch second image center 07:06:54.659 +13:59:13.82
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01292 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits &> /tmp/tmp.AcRrRKcDWc
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits &> /tmp/tmp.AheLeELOn3
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_220634_TTUQ1b1x1_396606_YcoNsPvZ/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-04-12_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits &> /tmp/tmp.8zhaS2Xzak
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_220634_TTUQ1b1x1_396606_YcoNsPvZ/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-04-12_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_220634_TTUQ1b1x1_396606_YcoNsPvZ/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits &> /tmp/tmp.B8s7Ma9i6w
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_220634_TTUQ1b1x1_396606_YcoNsPvZ/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits and wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits and wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits and wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 208537 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 98.2378 to 114.8303 deg, Dec +8.4571 to +19.3472 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 98.2378 to 114.8303 deg, Dec 8.4571 to 19.3472 deg
Loaded 19031 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10041 out of 15738 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 15738 out of 208537 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.747700
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.747700
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.41
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.34
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.34
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 208537 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 98.2378 to 114.8303 deg, Dec +8.4571 to +19.3472 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 98.2378 to 114.8303 deg, Dec 8.4571 to 19.3472 deg
Loaded 19031 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10041 out of 15738 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 15738 out of 208537 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits (aperture=4.7)
Read 174030 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 98.3423 to 114.8515 deg, Dec +8.5562 to +19.2862 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 98.3423 to 114.8515 deg, Dec 8.5562 to 19.2862 deg
Loaded 18685 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 11872 out of 16121 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 16121 out of 174030 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits (aperture=4.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 127 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
2.2 pix Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
2.3 pix fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-04-12_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits
2.3 pix fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits
2.0 pix wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
15.1 mag. Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-04-12_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.6 (SNR ) 14.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.AcRrRKcDWc (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_220634_TTUQ1b1x1_396606_YcoNsPvZ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=64, blended=33805, passed=208473
Got 208473 stars (including 174370 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 208473 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 927 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 917 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 204246 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 927 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 204243 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 204244 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Excluding outliers - 927 stars left (next iteration limit 1019)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits -region wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.AheLeELOn3 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_220634_TTUQ1b1x1_396606_YcoNsPvZ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=102, blended=23358, passed=173928
Got 173928 stars (including 150413 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 173928 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 929 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 917 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.62"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 171540 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 929 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 171538 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 171536 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
Excluding outliers - 927 stars left (next iteration limit 1020)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits -region wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.8zhaS2Xzak (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_220634_TTUQ1b1x1_396606_YcoNsPvZ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_220634_TTUQ1b1x1_396606_YcoNsPvZ/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-04-12_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_220634_TTUQ1b1x1_396606_YcoNsPvZ/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-04-12_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_220634_TTUQ1b1x1_396606_YcoNsPvZ/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-04-12_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_220634_TTUQ1b1x1_396606_YcoNsPvZ/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-04-12_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_220634_TTUQ1b1x1_396606_YcoNsPvZ/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-04-12_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_220634_TTUQ1b1x1_396606_YcoNsPvZ/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-04-12_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-04-12_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-04-12_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-04-12_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-04-12_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-04-12_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-04-12_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-04-12_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_220634_TTUQ1b1x1_396606_YcoNsPvZ/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-04-12_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-04-12_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=38, blended=16015, passed=131543
Got 131543 stars (including 115357 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-04-12_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 131543 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 919 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 910 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 129513 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 919 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 129512 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 129512 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Excluding outliers - 918 stars left (next iteration limit 1009)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-04-12_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-04-12_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_220634_TTUQ1b1x1_396606_YcoNsPvZ/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-04-12_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-04-12_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-04-12_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.B8s7Ma9i6w (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_220634_TTUQ1b1x1_396606_YcoNsPvZ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_220634_TTUQ1b1x1_396606_YcoNsPvZ/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_220634_TTUQ1b1x1_396606_YcoNsPvZ/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_220634_TTUQ1b1x1_396606_YcoNsPvZ/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_220634_TTUQ1b1x1_396606_YcoNsPvZ/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_220634_TTUQ1b1x1_396606_YcoNsPvZ/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_220634_TTUQ1b1x1_396606_YcoNsPvZ/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_220634_TTUQ1b1x1_396606_YcoNsPvZ/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=2, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=42, blended=15690, passed=130257
Got 130257 stars (including 114394 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 130257 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 490 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 922 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 909 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 128485 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 490 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 922 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 920 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 128486 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 920 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 128485 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Excluding outliers - 920 stars left (next iteration limit 1013)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_220634_TTUQ1b1x1_396606_YcoNsPvZ/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-04-12_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_220634_TTUQ1b1x1_396606_YcoNsPvZ/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-04-12_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_220634_TTUQ1b1x1_396606_YcoNsPvZ/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:49:38.29 +18:09:47.1: 14.23 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:21:06.72 +14:36:14.5: 14.59 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:08:05.59 +09:37:13.9: 13.84 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:09:15.52 +15:00:48.2: 14.06 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:21:06.72 +14:36:14.5: 14.79 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:08:05.59 +09:37:13.9: 13.78 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:09:15.52 +15:00:48.2: 14.02 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:49:38.29 +18:09:47.1: 14.15 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.65 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:21:06.72 +14:36:14.5: ref_mag=14.65 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.5598 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.81 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.04 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.19 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:08:05.59 +09:37:13.9: ref_mag=13.81 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9627 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:09:15.52 +15:00:48.2: ref_mag=14.04 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.2631 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:49:38.29 +18:09:47.1: ref_mag=14.19 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.3450 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:20:48.54 +17:18:14.0: 13.90 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:43:05.32 +17:31:23.0: 13.36 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:06:19.07 +09:38:04.0: 13.81 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:37:19.49 +12:21:23.3: 13.75 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:43:05.32 +17:31:23.0: 13.39 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.37 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:43:05.32 +17:31:23.0: ref_mag=13.37 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.0084 delta=-0.64 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:20:48.54 +17:18:14.0: 13.79 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:06:19.07 +09:38:04.0: 13.79 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:37:19.49 +12:21:23.3: 13.78 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.85 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:20:48.54 +17:18:14.0: ref_mag=13.85 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9998 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.80 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:06:19.07 +09:38:04.0: ref_mag=13.80 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9360 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.76 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:37:19.49 +12:21:23.3: ref_mag=13.76 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8938 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:10:23.67 +11:08:00.9: 13.71 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:10:23.67 +11:08:00.9: 13.45 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:11:02.18 +10:05:15.4: 13.47 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.58 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:10:23.67 +11:08:00.9: ref_mag=13.58 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.9181 delta=-0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:45:42.30 +14:24:52.7: 13.65 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:11:02.18 +10:05:15.4: 13.41 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.45 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:11:02.18 +10:05:15.4: ref_mag=13.45 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7139 delta=-0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:20:45.63 +13:14:39.9: 13.61 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:45:03.26 +17:45:51.1: 13.52 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:45:42.30 +14:24:52.7: 13.59 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.63 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:45:42.30 +14:24:52.7: ref_mag=13.63 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7477 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:12:42.43 +10:51:02.6: 13.32 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:20:45.63 +13:14:39.9: 13.67 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:45:03.26 +17:45:51.1: 13.52 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.63 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.52 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:20:45.63 +13:14:39.9: ref_mag=13.63 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7046 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:45:03.26 +17:45:51.1: ref_mag=13.52 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5961 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:12:42.43 +10:51:02.6: 13.22 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.28 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:12:42.43 +10:51:02.6: ref_mag=13.28 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.5633 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:39:10.15 +15:21:26.1: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:39:10.15 +15:21:26.1: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:39:10.15 +15:21:26.1: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:23:12.32 +12:44:22.8: 13.18 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:23:12.32 +12:44:22.8: 13.20 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.19 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:23:12.32 +12:44:22.8: ref_mag=13.19 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1406 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:41:53.32 +15:44:03.7: 15.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:41:53.32 +15:44:03.7: 15.63 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:16:19.16 +09:39:37.0: 13.48 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:57:23.71 +15:21:03.1: 16.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:16:19.16 +09:39:37.0: 13.50 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:16:25.33 +18:13:12.2: 13.86 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:57:23.71 +15:21:03.1: 15.74 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.49 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:16:19.16 +09:39:37.0: ref_mag=13.49 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.3319 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:27:59.17 +18:00:32.3: 15.81 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:35:06.78 +15:33:49.9: 13.81 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:16:25.33 +18:13:12.2: 13.62 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:27:59.17 +18:00:32.3: 15.57 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.74 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:16:25.33 +18:13:12.2: ref_mag=13.74 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6960 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:47:02.58 +16:15:41.3: 13.62 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:35:06.78 +15:33:49.9: 13.74 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.78 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:35:06.78 +15:33:49.9: ref_mag=13.78 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7060 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:47:02.58 +16:15:41.3: 13.72 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.66 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:47:02.58 +16:15:41.3: ref_mag=13.66 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6252 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:27:38.28 +14:49:03.6: 13.90 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:23:17.12 +12:50:10.8: 15.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:30:47.40 +14:48:20.9: 13.77 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:23:17.12 +12:50:10.8: 15.72 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:27:38.28 +14:49:03.6: 13.84 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.88 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:30:47.40 +14:48:20.9: 13.85 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:27:38.28 +14:49:03.6: ref_mag=13.88 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8949 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.80 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:30:47.40 +14:48:20.9: ref_mag=13.80 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.8170 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:49:28.77 +12:45:29.5: 15.62 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:28:24.19 +18:28:19.4: 14.93 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:58:30.23 +09:38:48.9: 14.61 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:02:01.97 +18:22:49.3: 14.66 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:05:11.04 +09:16:35.0: 14.96 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:49:28.77 +12:45:29.5: 15.45 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:58:30.23 +09:38:48.9: 14.55 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.58 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:58:30.23 +09:38:48.9: ref_mag=14.58 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.4314 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:02:01.97 +18:22:49.3: 14.75 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:28:24.19 +18:28:19.4: 14.97 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:05:11.04 +09:16:35.0: 14.90 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.69 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:02:01.97 +18:22:49.3: ref_mag=14.69 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.5018 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.94 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:28:24.19 +18:28:19.4: ref_mag=14.94 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.5007 delta=0.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.93 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:05:11.04 +09:16:35.0: ref_mag=14.93 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.6083 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:56:45.20 +09:03:23.6: 12.67 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:56:45.20 +09:03:23.6: 12.60 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.63 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:56:45.20 +09:03:23.6: ref_mag=12.63 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.5592 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out230215.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out230629.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out230825.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out231376.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out232207.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 11s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227620_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024
The candidate 227620_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227625_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024
The candidate 227625_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:04:07.14 +12:14:13.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227641_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024
The candidate 227641_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227651_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024
The candidate 227651_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:57:53.27 +14:51:31.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227652_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024
The candidate 227652_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227654_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024
The candidate 227654_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:40.46 +18:08:27.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227655_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024
The candidate 227655_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:11:28.49 +18:14:51.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227659_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024
The candidate 227659_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:50:59.48 +17:57:32.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227669_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024
The candidate 227669_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:51:02.37 +11:32:49.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227672_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024
The candidate 227672_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227674_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024
The candidate 227674_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:39:23.96 +12:51:08.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227675_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024
The candidate 227675_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227683_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024
The candidate 227683_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:51:24.64 +15:37:37.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227686_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024
The candidate 227686_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227692_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024
The candidate 227692_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227695_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024
The candidate 227695_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227701_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024
The candidate 227701_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227702_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024
The candidate 227702_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227707_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024
The candidate 227707_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227720_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024
The candidate 227720_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:03:07.28 +14:39:37.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227744_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024
The candidate 227744_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:51:24.32 +18:38:26.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227745_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024
The candidate 227745_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227748_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024
The candidate 227748_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:14:20.97 +10:56:18.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227750_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024
The candidate 227750_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:19:11.39 +18:47:36.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227754_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024
The candidate 227754_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227756_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024
The candidate 227756_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:33:05.31 +18:33:10.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227757_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024
The candidate 227757_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:47:43.51 +18:07:08.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227760_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024
The candidate 227760_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:14.44 +15:37:03.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227766_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024
The candidate 227766_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:31:55.99 +09:04:09.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227767_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024
The candidate 227767_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227770_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024
The candidate 227770_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227776_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024
The candidate 227776_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:05.58 +15:11:25.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227784_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024
The candidate 227784_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:37:52.34 +17:39:16.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227785_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024
The candidate 227785_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:39:50.26 +09:29:18.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227787_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024
The candidate 227787_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:41:18.27 +18:02:02.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227790_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024
The candidate 227790_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227794_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024
The candidate 227794_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:46:54.94 +17:46:19.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227796_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024
The candidate 227796_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:43:12.83 +18:20:08.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227798_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024
The candidate 227798_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:50:51.25 +13:24:48.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227807_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024
The candidate 227807_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:38:54.05 +12:32:56.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227809_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024
The candidate 227809_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:41:58.63 +12:32:17.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227815_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024
The candidate 227815_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:55:12.00 +17:59:07.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227819_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024
The candidate 227819_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227822_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024
The candidate 227822_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:43:15.92 +15:57:24.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227823_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024
The candidate 227823_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227824_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024
The candidate 227824_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227830_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024
The candidate 227830_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:15:37.43 +10:39:59.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227833_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024
The candidate 227833_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:01:01.99 +11:00:47.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227839_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024
The candidate 227839_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:54:17.18 +10:23:15.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227840_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024
The candidate 227840_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:08:28.89 +15:41:34.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227841_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024
The candidate 227841_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:53.75 +11:05:30.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227842_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024
The candidate 227842_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:23:57.75 +16:18:34.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227843_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024
The candidate 227843_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:37:01.95 +13:40:41.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227848_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024
The candidate 227848_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:54:05.04 +14:12:03.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227849_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024
The candidate 227849_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:53:44.72 +11:53:17.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227851_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024
The candidate 227851_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:19:52.77 +18:19:09.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227853_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024
The candidate 227853_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:51:09.10 +15:47:56.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228138_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024
The candidate 228138_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:50:50.45 +19:05:28.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228191_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024
The candidate 228191_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:39:13.70 +16:46:41.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228237_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024
The candidate 228237_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:39:13.21 +16:32:59.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228390_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024
The candidate 228390_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:33:11.03 +18:24:37.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228865_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024
The candidate 228865_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:39:11.40 +15:38:11.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229126_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024
The candidate 229126_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:46:58.17 +13:45:55.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229148_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024
The candidate 229148_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:43:49.24 +18:48:59.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229323_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024
The candidate 229323_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:54:13.19 +18:52:25.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229435_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024
The candidate 229435_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:53:14.60 +10:36:53.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229542_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024
The candidate 229542_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:36:40.11 +16:32:36.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229672_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024
The candidate 229672_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:40:46.94 +09:46:08.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229721_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024
The candidate 229721_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:52:26.90 +12:56:07.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229803_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024
The candidate 229803_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:43:11.05 +17:50:59.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229909_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024
The candidate 229909_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:18:11.80 +16:34:21.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229920_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024
The candidate 229920_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:47:19.49 +18:18:13.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230022_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024
The candidate 230022_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:15:06.12 +11:00:48.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230055_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024
The candidate 230055_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:40:28.94 +18:20:20.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230152_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024
The candidate 230152_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:40:43.90 +16:12:29.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230215_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024
Preparing report for the candidate 230215_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230245_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024
The candidate 230245_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:27:06.32 +11:58:49.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230364_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024
The candidate 230364_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:36:47.31 +09:32:57.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230365_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024
The candidate 230365_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:42:37.88 +10:50:33.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230400_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024
The candidate 230400_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:37:43.71 +13:46:29.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230433_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024
The candidate 230433_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:53:58.84 +09:58:01.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230494_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024
The candidate 230494_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:54:38.62 +18:11:20.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230500_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024
The candidate 230500_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:20:50.98 +09:18:59.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230509_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024
The candidate 230509_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230594_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024
The candidate 230594_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:35:53.37 +09:53:43.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230617_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024
The candidate 230617_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:15:55.71 +09:41:33.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230629_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024
Preparing report for the candidate 230629_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230636_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024
The candidate 230636_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:11:43.37 +16:56:55.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230645_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024
The candidate 230645_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:44:33.78 +16:50:45.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230649_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024
The candidate 230649_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:01:20.02 +17:46:35.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230742_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024
The candidate 230742_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:18:18.46 +11:38:34.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230757_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024
The candidate 230757_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230824_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024
The candidate 230824_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:44:42.89 +16:03:05.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230825_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024
Preparing report for the candidate 230825_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230861_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024
The candidate 230861_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230887_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024
The candidate 230887_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230983_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024
The candidate 230983_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:38:55.97 +17:47:08.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231017_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024
The candidate 231017_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:43.49 +13:30:08.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231046_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024
The candidate 231046_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:27.36 +18:14:51.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231057_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024
The candidate 231057_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:15:27.83 +10:30:56.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231072_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024
The candidate 231072_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:41:19.33 +12:01:42.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231112_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024
The candidate 231112_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:36:54.69 +09:20:02.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231180_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024
The candidate 231180_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:46:33.25 +15:22:59.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231332_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024
The candidate 231332_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231376_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024
Preparing report for the candidate 231376_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231390_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024
The candidate 231390_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231575_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024
The candidate 231575_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:05.03 +11:07:46.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231619_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024
The candidate 231619_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:53:22.60 +11:20:42.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231639_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024
The candidate 231639_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:46:10.30 +18:07:14.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231764_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024
The candidate 231764_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:42:11.59 +16:18:49.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231914_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024
The candidate 231914_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:46:57.92 +13:46:27.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231975_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024
The candidate 231975_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231989_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024
The candidate 231989_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:08:01.00 +15:10:05.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232152_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024
The candidate 232152_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:38:54.25 +17:47:22.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232153_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024
The candidate 232153_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:55:22.72 +17:55:31.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232202_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024
The candidate 232202_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:39:40.18 +17:56:45.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232207_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024
Preparing report for the candidate 232207_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232474_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024
The candidate 232474_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232658_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024
The candidate 232658_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:51:04.89 +11:07:53.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232682_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024
The candidate 232682_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232705_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024
The candidate 232705_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232716_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024
The candidate 232716_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 219819_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024
The candidate 219819_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:39.32 +10:34:49.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08039_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024
The candidate 08039_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 220513_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024
The candidate 220513_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:01:35.29 +15:01:00.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 219954_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024
The candidate 219954_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:03:29.77 +13:18:03.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 219541_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024
The candidate 219541_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_22-05-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024 did not pass the final checks