This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_030013_TTUQ1b1x1_3870179_IIHFb51s
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 08.3325 2461168.8325 11.17 14:40:21.67 -13:32:21.0
339.37089 41.49917 galactic Lib Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 8.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.116 Sirona 1 -0 1 11.1 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:40:21.67 -13:32:21.0: 15.45 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:40:21.67 -13:32:21.0: 15.41 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461168.8325,11.17,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260508.3325 11.17CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 08.3325 2461168.8325 11.87 14:02:41.48 -13:24:49.6
328.25926 45.92465 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 8.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.154 Bertha 1 -0 1 11.9 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:02:41.48 -13:24:49.6: 15.21 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:02:41.48 -13:24:49.6: 15.06 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 08.3325* 14 02 41.48 -13 24 49.6 11.9 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461168.8325,11.87,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260508.3325 11.87CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 08.3325 2461168.8325 12.02 14:26:04.97 -12:33:07.1
336.02477 44.15412 galactic Lib Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 8.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.79 Eurynome 1 -0 1 11.8 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:26:04.97 -12:33:07.1: 15.69 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:26:04.97 -12:33:07.1: 15.54 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461168.8325,12.02,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260508.3325 12.02CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 08.3325 2461168.8325 12.22 14:53:39.31 -12:48:14.2
343.44490 40.26325 galactic Lib Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 8.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.144 Vibilia 1 -0 1 12.3 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:53:39.31 -12:48:14.2: 15.51 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:53:39.31 -12:48:14.2: 15.54 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461168.8325,12.22,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260508.3325 12.22CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 08.3325 2461168.8325 12.98 14:18:19.73 -11:52:16.5
334.15050 45.66791 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 8.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.599 Luisa 1 -0 1 12.8 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:18:19.73 -11:52:16.5: 15.67 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:18:19.73 -11:52:16.5: 15.58 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 08.3325* 14 18 19.73 -11 52 16.5 13.0 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461168.8325,12.98,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260508.3325 12.98CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 08.3325 2461168.8325 13.40 14:51:19.08 -09:17:24.5
345.67188 43.41369 galactic Lib Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 8.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.758 Mancunia 1 -0 2 13.5 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:51:19.08 -09:17:24.5: 15.60 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:51:19.08 -09:17:24.5: 15.63 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461168.8325,13.40,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260508.3325 13.40CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 08.3325 2461168.8325 14.12 14:58:43.72 -13:01:53.8
344.55464 39.33948 galactic Lib Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.6" and 7.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1137 Raissa 0 -0 0 13.9 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:58:43.72 -13:01:53.8: 15.41 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:58:43.72 -13:01:53.8: 15.46 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461168.8325,14.12,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260508.3325 14.12CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 08.3325 2461168.8325 14.63 14:17:38.72 -12:00:59.3
333.84185 45.61815 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.2" and 8.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.279 Thule 2 0 2 14.7 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:17:38.72 -12:00:59.3: 15.60 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:17:38.72 -12:00:59.3: 15.50 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 08.3325* 14 17 38.72 -12 00 59.3 14.6 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461168.8325,14.63,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260508.3325 14.63CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461093.88465544 22.02.2026 09:13:44.230 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
First image: 2461093.88465544 22.02.2026 09:13:44.230 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
Last image: 2461168.83287859 08.05.2026 07:59:10.710 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_030013_TTUQ1b1x1_3870179_IIHFb51s/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 6
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.96
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 6403
Objects passed selection criteria: 6401
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 6089.75
Average stars matched: 5886.75 (96.6665 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 112096 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed May 6 12:14:36 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-43-g0c21e0c3
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri May 8 03:46:50 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461093.88465544 22.02.2026 09:13:44.230 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
First image: 2461093.88465544 22.02.2026 09:13:44.230 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
Last image: 2461168.83287859 08.05.2026 07:59:10.710 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_030013_TTUQ1b1x1_3870179_IIHFb51s/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 141
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.66
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 20 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 41508
Objects passed selection criteria: 41395
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 39168.2
Average stars matched: 37252.8 (95.1096 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 141276 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed May 6 12:14:36 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-43-g0c21e0c3
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri May 8 03:49:04 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_030013_TTUQ1b1x1_3870179_IIHFb51s/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_030013_TTUQ1b1x1_3870179_IIHFb51s/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_030013_TTUQ1b1x1_3870179_IIHFb51s/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_030013_TTUQ1b1x1_3870179_IIHFb51s/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461168.83216405
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits'
wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits'
wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits'
wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
Image size: 941.9'x627.3' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:34:21.145 -10:00:32.83 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:34:20.853 -09:59:07.13 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 14:34:21.145 -10:00:32.83
Second-epoch image center 14:34:20.853 -09:59:07.13
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0238 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:34:24.047 -09:59:16.01 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 14:34:21.145 -10:00:32.83
Second-epoch image center 14:34:24.047 -09:59:16.01
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0244 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 14:34:20.853 -09:59:07.13
Second-epoch second image center 14:34:24.047 -09:59:16.01
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01334 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits &> /tmp/tmp.YMXZJLWoQW
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits &> /tmp/tmp.8roMHGLzWV
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_030013_TTUQ1b1x1_3870179_IIHFb51s/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits &> /tmp/tmp.1EkKTc9t97
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_030013_TTUQ1b1x1_3870179_IIHFb51s/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_030013_TTUQ1b1x1_3870179_IIHFb51s/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits &> /tmp/tmp.iNFbSM6jOp
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_030013_TTUQ1b1x1_3870179_IIHFb51s/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits and wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits and wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits and wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits) and catalog (wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 6254 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 210.5114 to 226.6963 deg, Dec -15.2979 to -4.6850 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 210.5114 to 226.6963 deg, Dec -15.2979 to -4.6850 deg
Loaded 4529 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3605 out of 3773 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3773 out of 6254 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.850300
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.850300
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.96
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.89
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.89
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 6254 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 210.5114 to 226.6963 deg, Dec -15.2979 to -4.6850 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 210.5114 to 226.6963 deg, Dec -15.2979 to -4.6850 deg
Loaded 4529 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3605 out of 3773 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3773 out of 6254 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits (aperture=6.4)
Read 6302 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 210.5478 to 226.6969 deg, Dec -15.3043 to -4.6253 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 210.5478 to 226.6969 deg, Dec -15.3043 to -4.6253 deg
Loaded 4559 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3588 out of 3695 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3695 out of 6302 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits (aperture=6.8)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 6 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
2.5 pix Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
2.4 pix fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits
2.4 pix fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
2.5 pix wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.9 mag. Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
14.8 mag. Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.8 (SNR ) 11.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.YMXZJLWoQW (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-08_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_030013_TTUQ1b1x1_3870179_IIHFb51s/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits 569.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits' -> 'wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=490, passed=6254
Got 6254 stars (including 5757 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6254 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013082 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010466 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 966 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6183 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6184 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6184 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 972 stars left (next iteration limit 1069)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits -region wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.8roMHGLzWV (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-08_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_030013_TTUQ1b1x1_3870179_IIHFb51s/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits 567.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits' -> 'wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=417, passed=6302
Got 6302 stars (including 5882 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6302 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 964 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6236 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6235 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6235 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 972 stars left (next iteration limit 1069)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits -region wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.1EkKTc9t97 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-08_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_030013_TTUQ1b1x1_3870179_IIHFb51s/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_030013_TTUQ1b1x1_3870179_IIHFb51s/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_030013_TTUQ1b1x1_3870179_IIHFb51s/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_030013_TTUQ1b1x1_3870179_IIHFb51s/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_030013_TTUQ1b1x1_3870179_IIHFb51s/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_030013_TTUQ1b1x1_3870179_IIHFb51s/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_030013_TTUQ1b1x1_3870179_IIHFb51s/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_030013_TTUQ1b1x1_3870179_IIHFb51s/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=479, passed=5992
Got 5992 stars (including 5507 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5992 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 957 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5926 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5929 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5929 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 973 stars left (next iteration limit 1070)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_030013_TTUQ1b1x1_3870179_IIHFb51s/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits -region wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.iNFbSM6jOp (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-08_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_030013_TTUQ1b1x1_3870179_IIHFb51s/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_030013_TTUQ1b1x1_3870179_IIHFb51s/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_030013_TTUQ1b1x1_3870179_IIHFb51s/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_030013_TTUQ1b1x1_3870179_IIHFb51s/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_030013_TTUQ1b1x1_3870179_IIHFb51s/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_030013_TTUQ1b1x1_3870179_IIHFb51s/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_030013_TTUQ1b1x1_3870179_IIHFb51s/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_030013_TTUQ1b1x1_3870179_IIHFb51s/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=481, passed=5985
Got 5985 stars (including 5495 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5985 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 958 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5935 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5935 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5935 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 972 stars left (next iteration limit 1069)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_030013_TTUQ1b1x1_3870179_IIHFb51s/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits -region wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_030013_TTUQ1b1x1_3870179_IIHFb51s/wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_030013_TTUQ1b1x1_3870179_IIHFb51s/wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Lib-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:40:21.67 -13:32:21.0: 15.45 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:02:41.48 -13:24:49.6: 15.21 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:02:41.48 -13:24:49.6: 15.06 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:40:21.67 -13:32:21.0: 15.41 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20551.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20610.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 7s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20551_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365
Preparing report for the candidate 20551_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20599_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 20599_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:58:33.90 -09:31:10.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20603_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 20603_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:54:58.88 -05:38:23.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20610_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365
Preparing report for the candidate 20610_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20614_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 20614_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:16:48.56 -06:17:14.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20634_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 20634_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:35:18.05 -08:57:04.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 9s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Lib-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
14:40:21.67 -13:32:21.0
14:02:41.48 -13:24:49.6
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_030013_TTUQ1b1x1_3870179_IIHFb51s/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_030013_TTUQ1b1x1_3870179_IIHFb51s/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_030013_TTUQ1b1x1_3870179_IIHFb51s/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_030013_TTUQ1b1x1_3870179_IIHFb51s/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
Image size: 941.9'x627.3' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:34:21.145 -10:00:32.83 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:34:20.853 -09:59:07.13 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 14:34:21.145 -10:00:32.83
Second-epoch image center 14:34:20.853 -09:59:07.13
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0238 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:34:24.047 -09:59:16.01 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 14:34:21.145 -10:00:32.83
Second-epoch image center 14:34:24.047 -09:59:16.01
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0244 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 14:34:20.853 -09:59:07.13
Second-epoch second image center 14:34:24.047 -09:59:16.01
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01334 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits &> /tmp/tmp.aR289xBta4
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits &> /tmp/tmp.gBbmpzEdSi
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_030013_TTUQ1b1x1_3870179_IIHFb51s/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits &> /tmp/tmp.nKDqMj1Kfr
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_030013_TTUQ1b1x1_3870179_IIHFb51s/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_030013_TTUQ1b1x1_3870179_IIHFb51s/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits &> /tmp/tmp.GCkEJs57er
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_030013_TTUQ1b1x1_3870179_IIHFb51s/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits and wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits and wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits and wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits) and catalog (wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 40722 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 210.4556 to 226.7070 deg, Dec -15.3009 to -4.6848 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 210.4556 to 226.7070 deg, Dec -15.3009 to -4.6848 deg
Loaded 4550 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3575 out of 3952 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3952 out of 40722 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.701900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.701900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.66
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.04
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.04
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 40722 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 210.4556 to 226.7070 deg, Dec -15.3009 to -4.6848 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 210.4556 to 226.7070 deg, Dec -15.3009 to -4.6848 deg
Loaded 4550 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3575 out of 3952 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3952 out of 40722 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits (aperture=4.8)
Read 37655 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 210.5434 to 226.6969 deg, Dec -15.3297 to -4.6171 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 210.5434 to 226.6969 deg, Dec -15.3297 to -4.6171 deg
Loaded 4571 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3548 out of 3862 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3862 out of 37655 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits (aperture=5.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 126 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
2.3 pix Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
2.1 pix fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits
2.1 pix fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.0 mag. Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
15.0 mag. Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.0 (SNR ) 14.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.aR289xBta4 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-08_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_030013_TTUQ1b1x1_3870179_IIHFb51s/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits 569.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits' -> 'wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=1712, passed=40709
Got 40709 stars (including 38929 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 40709 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013082 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010466 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 965 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40241 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40240 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40240 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 973 stars left (next iteration limit 1070)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits -region wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.gBbmpzEdSi (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-08_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_030013_TTUQ1b1x1_3870179_IIHFb51s/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits 567.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits' -> 'wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=18, blended=1689, passed=37637
Got 37637 stars (including 35895 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 37637 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 960 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37148 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37150 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37150 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 969 stars left (next iteration limit 1065)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits -region wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.nKDqMj1Kfr (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-08_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_030013_TTUQ1b1x1_3870179_IIHFb51s/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_030013_TTUQ1b1x1_3870179_IIHFb51s/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_030013_TTUQ1b1x1_3870179_IIHFb51s/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_030013_TTUQ1b1x1_3870179_IIHFb51s/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_030013_TTUQ1b1x1_3870179_IIHFb51s/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_030013_TTUQ1b1x1_3870179_IIHFb51s/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_030013_TTUQ1b1x1_3870179_IIHFb51s/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_030013_TTUQ1b1x1_3870179_IIHFb51s/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=1746, passed=39934
Got 39934 stars (including 38116 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 39934 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 963 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39540 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39541 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39541 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 976 stars left (next iteration limit 1073)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_030013_TTUQ1b1x1_3870179_IIHFb51s/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits -region wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.GCkEJs57er (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-08_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_030013_TTUQ1b1x1_3870179_IIHFb51s/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_030013_TTUQ1b1x1_3870179_IIHFb51s/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_030013_TTUQ1b1x1_3870179_IIHFb51s/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_030013_TTUQ1b1x1_3870179_IIHFb51s/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_030013_TTUQ1b1x1_3870179_IIHFb51s/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_030013_TTUQ1b1x1_3870179_IIHFb51s/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_030013_TTUQ1b1x1_3870179_IIHFb51s/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_030013_TTUQ1b1x1_3870179_IIHFb51s/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=17, blended=1786, passed=39790
Got 39790 stars (including 37928 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 39790 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 431 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 964 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39479 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 431 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39479 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39479 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 976 stars left (next iteration limit 1073)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_030013_TTUQ1b1x1_3870179_IIHFb51s/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits -region wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_030013_TTUQ1b1x1_3870179_IIHFb51s/wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_030013_TTUQ1b1x1_3870179_IIHFb51s/wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Lib-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:39:58.46 -06:00:11.6: 14.51 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 15:05:21.53 -08:27:20.6: 13.56 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:35:17.81 -13:58:12.3: 14.06 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:28:07.43 -10:50:34.1: 13.51 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:38:12.26 -12:14:18.4: 12.97 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:43:28.52 -08:28:01.8: 14.87 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:39:58.46 -06:00:11.6: 14.57 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.54 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:39:58.46 -06:00:11.6: ref_mag=14.54 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.4636 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 15:05:21.53 -08:27:20.6: 13.58 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.57 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:41:00.51 -08:04:30.6: 12.03 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:05:21.53 -08:27:20.6: ref_mag=13.57 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.9495 delta=-0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:35:17.81 -13:58:12.3: 14.02 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.04 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:35:17.81 -13:58:12.3: ref_mag=14.04 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.2742 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:38:12.26 -12:14:18.4: 12.83 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.90 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:38:12.26 -12:14:18.4: ref_mag=12.90 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2351 delta=-0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:28:07.43 -10:50:34.1: 13.19 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.32 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:28:07.43 -10:50:34.1: ref_mag=13.32 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.2401 delta=-0.92 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:43:28.52 -08:28:01.8: 14.43 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.57 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:43:28.52 -08:28:01.8: ref_mag=14.57 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.5671 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:41:00.51 -08:04:30.6: 11.85 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.93 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:41:00.51 -08:04:30.6: ref_mag=11.93 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3444 delta=-0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:26:04.97 -12:33:07.1: 15.69 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:53:39.31 -12:48:14.2: 15.51 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:18:19.73 -11:52:16.5: 15.67 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:12:30.02 -11:11:10.5: 12.95 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:41:42.35 -05:31:39.5: 12.74 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:51:19.08 -09:17:24.5: 15.60 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:14:50.25 -10:29:27.8: 12.93 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:26:04.97 -12:33:07.1: 15.54 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:53:39.31 -12:48:14.2: 15.54 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:18:19.73 -11:52:16.5: 15.58 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:16:19.87 -04:43:11.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:16:19.87 -04:43:11.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:16:19.87 -04:43:11.9: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:12:30.02 -11:11:10.5: 12.73 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.82 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:12:30.02 -11:11:10.5: ref_mag=12.82 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1076 delta=-0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:41:42.35 -05:31:39.5: 12.63 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.69 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:41:42.35 -05:31:39.5: ref_mag=12.69 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1272 delta=-0.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:19:39.19 -05:09:39.9: 13.76 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:51:19.08 -09:17:24.5: 15.63 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:14:50.25 -10:29:27.8: 12.91 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.92 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:14:50.25 -10:29:27.8: ref_mag=12.92 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3734 delta=-0.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:19:14.72 -08:44:01.2: 13.88 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:19:39.19 -05:09:39.9: 13.60 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.68 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:19:39.19 -05:09:39.9: ref_mag=13.68 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.7469 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 15:01:04.01 -15:09:23.8: 15.25 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 15:01:04.01 -15:09:23.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:01:04.01 -15:09:23.8: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:03:16.67 -12:19:45.4: 13.98 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:19:14.72 -08:44:01.2: 13.89 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.89 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:19:14.72 -08:44:01.2: ref_mag=13.89 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.8162 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:03:16.67 -12:19:45.4: 13.59 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.75 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:25:48.55 -05:42:32.5: 13.53 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:03:16.67 -12:19:45.4: ref_mag=13.75 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.8310 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:58:43.72 -13:01:53.8: 15.41 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:18:10.90 -09:47:21.1: 13.92 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 15:05:50.71 -07:24:42.7: 14.49 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:25:48.55 -05:42:32.5: 13.75 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 15:05:50.71 -07:24:42.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:05:50.71 -07:24:42.7: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.61 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:25:48.55 -05:42:32.5: ref_mag=13.61 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8746 delta=-0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:58:43.72 -13:01:53.8: 15.46 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:18:10.90 -09:47:21.1: 13.92 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.92 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:18:10.90 -09:47:21.1: ref_mag=13.92 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.0463 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:01:58.48 -14:12:56.6: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:01:58.48 -14:12:56.6: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:01:58.48 -14:12:56.6: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 15:01:48.42 -14:46:08.1: 14.32 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 15:04:03.09 -11:42:52.6: 14.61 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:23:16.48 -12:56:59.5: 14.35 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 15:01:48.42 -14:46:08.1: 14.15 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.22 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:01:48.42 -14:46:08.1: ref_mag=14.22 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.3038 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 15:04:03.09 -11:42:52.6: 14.65 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.63 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:04:03.09 -11:42:52.6: ref_mag=14.63 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.3604 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:57:51.34 -14:55:15.5: 14.67 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:23:16.48 -12:56:59.5: 14.39 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.37 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:23:16.48 -12:56:59.5: ref_mag=14.37 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.3481 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:57:51.34 -14:55:15.5: 14.27 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.40 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:57:51.34 -14:55:15.5: ref_mag=14.40 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.3722 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:54:27.38 -14:43:24.5: 14.41 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:54:27.31 -09:48:26.5: 14.21 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:02:09.44 -12:31:03.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:02:09.44 -12:31:03.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:02:09.44 -12:31:03.9: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:54:27.38 -14:43:24.5: 14.48 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.45 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:54:27.38 -14:43:24.5: ref_mag=14.45 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.2482 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:02:44.28 -13:19:28.4: 14.77 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:54:27.31 -09:48:26.5: 14.26 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.23 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:54:27.31 -09:48:26.5: ref_mag=14.23 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.3417 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 15:05:36.48 -05:40:23.1: 14.79 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 15:05:36.48 -05:40:23.1: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:05:36.48 -05:40:23.1: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:02:44.28 -13:19:28.4: 14.80 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.78 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:02:44.28 -13:19:28.4: ref_mag=14.78 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.4212 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:03:25.96 -10:53:18.2: 14.21 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 15:01:59.15 -07:33:57.5: 14.61 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 15:05:35.55 -06:59:25.9: 14.50 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 15:05:35.55 -06:59:25.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:05:35.55 -06:59:25.9: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 15:05:41.17 -09:50:53.1: 14.53 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:23:11.94 -05:40:03.6: 14.64 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:03:25.96 -10:53:18.2: 14.12 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.17 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:03:25.96 -10:53:18.2: ref_mag=14.17 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.3274 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 15:01:59.15 -07:33:57.5: 14.51 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.56 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:01:59.15 -07:33:57.5: ref_mag=14.56 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.4350 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 15:05:41.17 -09:50:53.1: 14.51 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.52 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:05:41.17 -09:50:53.1: ref_mag=14.52 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.3827 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:23:11.94 -05:40:03.6: 15.04 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.76 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:23:11.94 -05:40:03.6: ref_mag=14.76 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.4092 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 15:05:55.80 -05:56:22.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 15:05:55.80 -05:56:22.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:05:55.80 -05:56:22.7: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:48:35.11 -07:06:41.9: 14.59 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:54:04.53 -05:53:16.4: 14.78 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:03:41.22 -13:27:27.2: 14.51 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:21:27.83 -05:14:39.0: 14.15 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:48:35.11 -07:06:41.9: 14.36 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.45 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:48:35.11 -07:06:41.9: ref_mag=14.45 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.3056 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:54:04.53 -05:53:16.4: 14.29 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.44 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:54:04.53 -05:53:16.4: ref_mag=14.44 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.5512 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 15:03:34.19 -06:04:05.2: 15.17 +/- 0.29 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:03:41.22 -13:27:27.2: 14.47 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.49 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:03:41.22 -13:27:27.2: ref_mag=14.49 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.3927 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:21:27.83 -05:14:39.0: 14.15 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.15 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:21:27.83 -05:14:39.0: ref_mag=14.15 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.4189 delta=-0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 15:03:34.19 -06:04:05.2: 14.82 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.93 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:03:34.19 -06:04:05.2: ref_mag=14.93 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=14.5642 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:03:12.43 -13:24:42.8: 14.66 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:57:07.59 -05:28:12.3: 15.01 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 15:05:46.10 -05:50:57.4: 14.39 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:29:38.79 -05:41:11.6: 14.33 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 15:05:46.10 -05:50:57.4: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:05:46.10 -05:50:57.4: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:03:12.43 -13:24:42.8: 14.87 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:57:07.59 -05:28:12.3: 14.82 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.73 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.89 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:03:12.43 -13:24:42.8: ref_mag=14.73 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.4582 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:57:07.59 -05:28:12.3: ref_mag=14.89 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.4669 delta=0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:29:38.79 -05:41:11.6: 14.15 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.24 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:29:38.79 -05:41:11.6: ref_mag=14.24 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.4959 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:58:02.47 -06:45:56.3: 14.52 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:07:05.95 -12:39:26.4: 14.85 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:30:45.95 -05:55:28.9: 14.51 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 15:01:11.94 -05:55:06.5: 14.34 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:58:02.47 -06:45:56.3: 14.67 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.58 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:58:02.47 -06:45:56.3: ref_mag=14.58 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.5591 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:07:05.95 -12:39:26.4: 14.83 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.84 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:02:24.28 -13:15:51.1: 14.63 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:07:05.95 -12:39:26.4: ref_mag=14.84 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.5237 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:30:45.95 -05:55:28.9: 14.49 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.50 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:30:45.95 -05:55:28.9: ref_mag=14.50 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.5029 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 15:01:11.94 -05:55:06.5: 14.62 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.45 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:01:11.94 -05:55:06.5: ref_mag=14.45 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.5959 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:02:24.28 -13:15:51.1: 14.55 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.60 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:02:24.28 -13:15:51.1: ref_mag=14.60 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.4858 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 15:03:26.19 -11:09:49.4: 14.98 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:13:29.89 -05:13:37.0: 14.81 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:10:39.52 -13:55:37.7: 14.55 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:39:36.23 -11:58:11.4: 14.39 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 15:03:26.19 -11:09:49.4: 14.76 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.84 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:03:26.19 -11:09:49.4: ref_mag=14.84 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.6031 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:13:29.89 -05:13:37.0: 14.86 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.83 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:13:29.89 -05:13:37.0: ref_mag=14.83 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.4999 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:19:06.79 -14:27:48.0: 14.64 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:10:39.52 -13:55:37.7: 14.69 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:39:36.23 -11:58:11.4: 14.73 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.60 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.50 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:10:39.52 -13:55:37.7: ref_mag=14.60 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.4618 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:39:36.23 -11:58:11.4: ref_mag=14.50 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.6330 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:19:06.79 -14:27:48.0: 14.60 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.62 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:19:06.79 -14:27:48.0: ref_mag=14.62 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.3483 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 15:05:13.76 -10:14:38.6: 15.29 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 15:05:44.78 -09:26:16.1: 14.60 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:31:03.55 -07:21:12.6: 14.64 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:42:53.17 -06:49:06.0: 14.62 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 15:05:13.76 -10:14:38.6: 14.71 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.71 +/- 0.20
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:05:13.76 -10:14:38.6: ref_mag=14.71 +/- 0.20 new_mean_mag=14.6783 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:58:57.33 -06:40:06.2: 14.60 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 15:05:44.78 -09:26:16.1: 14.33 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.43 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:05:44.78 -09:26:16.1: ref_mag=14.43 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.6302 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:31:03.55 -07:21:12.6: 14.48 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.55 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:31:03.55 -07:21:12.6: ref_mag=14.55 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.5631 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:42:53.17 -06:49:06.0: 14.75 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.68 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:42:53.17 -06:49:06.0: ref_mag=14.68 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.5683 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:58:57.33 -06:40:06.2: 14.81 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.68 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:58:57.33 -06:40:06.2: ref_mag=14.68 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.5309 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 15:01:58.89 -12:54:40.5: 14.77 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:17:38.72 -12:00:59.3: 15.60 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 15:06:00.97 -08:19:47.6: 14.73 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 15:06:00.97 -08:19:47.6: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:06:00.97 -08:19:47.6: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 15:01:58.89 -12:54:40.5: 14.85 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.81 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:08:42.43 -09:37:32.8: 14.90 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:01:58.89 -12:54:40.5: ref_mag=14.81 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.4521 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:17:38.72 -12:00:59.3: 15.50 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:08:42.43 -09:37:32.8: 15.14 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.97 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:08:42.43 -09:37:32.8: ref_mag=14.97 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.5448 delta=0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:54:11.02 -15:12:07.5: 14.35 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:17:22.03 -10:51:01.0: 14.86 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:54:11.02 -15:12:07.5: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:54:11.02 -15:12:07.5: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:23:45.79 -13:40:06.1: 14.99 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 15:04:03.30 -06:01:41.0: 14.69 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 15:02:02.33 -08:54:12.8: 14.80 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:04:40.42 -13:27:04.2: 14.58 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:28:13.00 -06:21:24.5: 14.70 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:17:22.03 -10:51:01.0: 14.84 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.85 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:17:22.03 -10:51:01.0: ref_mag=14.85 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.6080 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:23:45.79 -13:40:06.1: 14.88 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.93 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:23:45.79 -13:40:06.1: ref_mag=14.93 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.6443 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:21:05.93 -09:57:10.6: 14.81 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 15:04:03.30 -06:01:41.0: 14.80 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.74 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:04:03.30 -06:01:41.0: ref_mag=14.74 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.4544 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 15:05:47.78 -06:04:57.0: 14.86 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 15:05:47.78 -06:04:57.0: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:05:47.78 -06:04:57.0: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 15:02:02.33 -08:54:12.8: 14.52 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:04:40.42 -13:27:04.2: 14.67 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.63 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.61 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:02:02.33 -08:54:12.8: ref_mag=14.63 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.6741 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:04:40.42 -13:27:04.2: ref_mag=14.61 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.4344 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 15:02:15.26 -06:17:30.7: 14.49 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:28:13.00 -06:21:24.5: 14.98 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.80 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:28:13.00 -06:21:24.5: ref_mag=14.80 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.5635 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:21:05.93 -09:57:10.6: 15.02 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.88 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:21:05.93 -09:57:10.6: ref_mag=14.88 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.6427 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 15:02:15.26 -06:17:30.7: 14.92 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.63 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:12:07.97 -05:08:07.2: 14.83 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:02:15.26 -06:17:30.7: ref_mag=14.63 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.6591 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:46:01.14 -15:14:29.6: 14.51 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:46:01.14 -15:14:29.6: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:46:01.14 -15:14:29.6: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 15:04:41.56 -13:57:50.3: 15.16 +/- 0.33 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:04:35.82 -08:55:46.8: 14.86 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:36:34.38 -12:28:35.0: 14.40 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 15:02:48.37 -13:16:20.6: 14.39 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:46:49.74 -07:34:26.1: 15.07 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:12:07.97 -05:08:07.2: 15.31 +/- 0.33 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.94 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:12:07.97 -05:08:07.2: ref_mag=14.94 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.4841 delta=0.46 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:12:03.69 -08:58:14.0: 15.14 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 15:04:41.56 -13:57:50.3: 14.33 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.47 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:04:41.56 -13:57:50.3: ref_mag=14.47 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.4665 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:04:35.82 -08:55:46.8: 14.65 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.74 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:36:34.38 -12:28:35.0: 14.30 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:04:35.82 -08:55:46.8: ref_mag=14.74 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.5332 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 15:02:48.37 -13:16:20.6: 14.54 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.35 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:36:34.38 -12:28:35.0: ref_mag=14.35 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.5757 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.46 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:02:48.37 -13:16:20.6: ref_mag=14.46 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.4434 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:46:49.74 -07:34:26.1: 14.99 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:09:09.52 -05:11:56.3: 14.61 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.03 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:46:49.74 -07:34:26.1: ref_mag=15.03 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.7017 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:12:03.69 -08:58:14.0: 15.27 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.19 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:12:03.69 -08:58:14.0: ref_mag=15.19 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=14.7028 delta=0.48 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:09:09.52 -05:11:56.3: 15.33 +/- 0.35 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.73 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:09:09.52 -05:11:56.3: ref_mag=14.73 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.5400 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53550.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53578.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53738.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53864.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54167.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54596.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 14s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53344_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 53344_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53345_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 53345_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53347_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 53347_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53349_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 53349_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53353_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 53353_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53355_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 53355_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53356_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 53356_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:13:17.21 -05:28:03.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53359_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 53359_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:52:09.84 -05:15:29.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53360_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 53360_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53362_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 53362_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:51:32.76 -13:49:34.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53363_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 53363_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:29:34.55 -06:11:24.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53364_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 53364_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:38:45.13 -09:23:44.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53365_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 53365_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:41:46.13 -05:16:16.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53366_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 53366_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53367_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 53367_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:26:47.67 -07:46:51.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53456_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 53456_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:40:21.67 -13:32:21.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53517_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 53517_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:02:41.48 -13:24:49.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53550_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365
Preparing report for the candidate 53550_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53578_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365
Preparing report for the candidate 53578_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53638_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 53638_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:56:41.26 -13:58:44.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53650_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 53650_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:57:15.84 -14:08:18.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53656_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 53656_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:17:48.27 -05:07:37.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53669_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 53669_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:05:04.10 -11:01:57.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53738_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365
Preparing report for the candidate 53738_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53797_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 53797_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53809_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 53809_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53864_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365
Preparing report for the candidate 53864_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53896_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 53896_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53960_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 53960_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:06:11.08 -11:48:51.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53983_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 53983_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:42:44.76 -08:44:00.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53984_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 53984_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54031_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 54031_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:31:14.43 -05:35:38.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54073_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 54073_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54083_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 54083_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54087_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 54087_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54094_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 54094_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54107_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 54107_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:13:12.74 -12:30:55.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54114_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 54114_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:02:12.12 -13:42:24.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54129_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 54129_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:29:03.85 -06:12:14.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54131_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 54131_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54147_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 54147_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:06:00.09 -06:44:27.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54167_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365
Preparing report for the candidate 54167_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54210_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 54210_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54229_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 54229_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:08:09.24 -12:56:39.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54268_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 54268_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54292_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 54292_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:00:27.52 -14:49:04.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54293_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 54293_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54335_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 54335_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:04:50.18 -07:09:12.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54348_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 54348_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54356_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 54356_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:29:40.54 -05:57:10.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54374_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 54374_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:28:08.16 -11:45:07.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54379_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 54379_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54380_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 54380_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:21:37.50 -14:30:44.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54386_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 54386_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54389_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 54389_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:43:56.70 -14:50:06.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54407_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 54407_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:57:47.53 -15:09:48.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54409_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 54409_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54415_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 54415_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:48:52.24 -13:01:12.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54423_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 54423_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:19:08.74 -07:27:12.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54425_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 54425_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54426_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 54426_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54445_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 54445_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:48:19.56 -15:07:17.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54456_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 54456_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54457_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 54457_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54469_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 54469_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54473_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 54473_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:57:39.76 -15:08:03.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54478_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 54478_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:13:32.95 -11:19:01.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54483_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 54483_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54488_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 54488_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:05:41.99 -05:37:37.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54490_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 54490_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54492_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 54492_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54496_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 54496_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54497_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 54497_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54498_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 54498_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54499_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 54499_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54503_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 54503_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54510_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 54510_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54518_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 54518_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54519_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 54519_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54526_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 54526_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54532_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 54532_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54538_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 54538_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54540_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 54540_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54541_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 54541_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:51:58.83 -06:05:26.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54552_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 54552_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54557_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 54557_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54558_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 54558_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54559_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 54559_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54560_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 54560_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54561_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 54561_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54565_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 54565_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54571_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 54571_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54577_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 54577_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54579_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 54579_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54582_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 54582_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54586_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 54586_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:01:37.00 -05:34:05.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54588_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 54588_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54589_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 54589_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54591_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 54591_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54593_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 54593_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54595_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 54595_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54596_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365
Preparing report for the candidate 54596_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54600_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 54600_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54606_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 54606_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54613_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 54613_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:10:01.68 -05:48:30.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54615_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 54615_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54621_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 54621_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54629_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 54629_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54631_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 54631_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54635_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 54635_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54639_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 54639_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54642_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 54642_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54647_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 54647_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54648_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 54648_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54650_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 54650_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54652_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 54652_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54655_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 54655_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54663_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 54663_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54666_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 54666_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54673_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 54673_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54676_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 54676_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54689_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 54689_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54718_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 54718_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54727_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 54727_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:02:28.50 -12:31:58.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54752_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 54752_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54757_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365
The candidate 54757_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-59-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365 did not pass the final checks
