This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_002311_TTUQ2b1x1_2671510_riR584qb
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 08.2238 2461168.7238 10.64 16:49:02.07 -20:49:07.1
359.39403 15.15379 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 4.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.21 Lutetia 1 -1 1 10.8 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:49:02.07 -20:49:07.1: 15.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:49:02.07 -20:49:07.1: 15.25 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461168.7238,10.64,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260508.2238 10.64CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 08.2238 2461168.7238 12.12 17:02:43.42 -14:35:02.4
6.62285 16.17673 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 4.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.48 Doris 0 -0 1 12.2 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 17:02:43.42 -14:35:02.4: 15.39 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 17:02:43.42 -14:35:02.4: 15.56 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461168.7238,12.12,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260508.2238 12.12CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 08.2238 2461168.7238 13.48 16:48:17.30 -15:53:09.3
3.39957 18.26020 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.8" and 4.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.364 Isara 1 0 1 13.6 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:48:17.30 -15:53:09.3: 15.40 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:48:17.30 -15:53:09.3: 15.60 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461168.7238,13.48,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260508.2238 13.48CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 08.2238 2461168.7238 14.26 16:50:48.41 -14:35:21.8
4.88096 18.53235 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.1" and 4.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.741 Botolphia -0 0 1 14.0 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:50:48.41 -14:35:21.8: 15.43 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:50:48.41 -14:35:21.8: 15.65 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461168.7238,14.26,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260508.2238 14.26CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 08.2238 2461168.7238 14.27 16:48:18.86 -17:38:13.1
1.92761 17.21105 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 4.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.358 Apollonia -0 0 0 14.2 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:48:18.86 -17:38:13.1: 15.30 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:48:18.86 -17:38:13.1: 15.52 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461168.7238,14.27,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260508.2238 14.27CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 08.2238 2461168.7238 12.81 17:06:31.53 -18:05:19.4
4.17773 13.43306 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 4.2 pix
The object was found in VSX 0" V1373 Oph
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.100 V < 14.900 V 2452840.00000 146.200000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 17:06:31.53 -18:05:19.4: 13.88 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 17:06:31.53 -18:05:19.4: 13.90 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.89 +/- 0.06
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V1373 Oph,2461168.7238,12.81,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V1373 Oph 20260508.2238 12.81CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461148.85630580 18.04.2026 08:32:54.821 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
First image: 2461148.85630580 18.04.2026 08:32:54.821 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
Last image: 2461168.72408212 08.05.2026 05:22:30.695 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_002311_TTUQ2b1x1_2671510_riR584qb/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 6
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.13
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 2 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 4306
Objects passed selection criteria: 4305
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 4238.5
Average stars matched: 3951 (93.2169 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 111232 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed May 6 12:14:36 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-43-g0c21e0c3
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri May 8 00:26:15 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461148.85630580 18.04.2026 08:32:54.821 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
First image: 2461148.85630580 18.04.2026 08:32:54.821 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
Last image: 2461168.72408212 08.05.2026 05:22:30.695 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_002311_TTUQ2b1x1_2671510_riR584qb/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 93
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.69
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 27 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 53811
Objects passed selection criteria: 53736
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 51141.5
Average stars matched: 46586 (91.0924 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 160144 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed May 6 12:14:36 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-43-g0c21e0c3
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri May 8 00:28:28 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_002311_TTUQ2b1x1_2671510_riR584qb/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-21-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_002311_TTUQ2b1x1_2671510_riR584qb/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_002311_TTUQ2b1x1_2671510_riR584qb/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-21-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_002311_TTUQ2b1x1_2671510_riR584qb/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461168.72354644
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits'
wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits'
wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-21-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-21-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-21-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-21-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits'
wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
Image size: 937.6'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:53:14.795 -17:57:56.98 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-21-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-21-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits
Image size: 938.5'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:53:19.807 -17:59:51.90 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:53:14.795 -17:57:56.98
Second-epoch image center 16:53:19.807 -17:59:51.90
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0376 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164.fits
util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Image size: 938.4'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:53:21.594 -17:59:48.27 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:53:14.795 -17:57:56.98
Second-epoch image center 16:53:21.594 -17:59:48.27
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0410 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 16:53:19.807 -17:59:51.90
Second-epoch second image center 16:53:21.594 -17:59:48.27
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00715 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits &> /tmp/tmp.uZZlKuvpBw
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits &> /tmp/tmp.wlXMOpmJrl
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_002311_TTUQ2b1x1_2671510_riR584qb/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-21-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits &> /tmp/tmp.TICwddaMfx
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_002311_TTUQ2b1x1_2671510_riR584qb/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-21-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_002311_TTUQ2b1x1_2671510_riR584qb/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164.fits &> /tmp/tmp.UiD1k1r28K
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_002311_TTUQ2b1x1_2671510_riR584qb/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits and wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits and wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits and wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits) and catalog (wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 6602 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 244.9581 to 261.8337 deg, Dec -23.2408 to -12.5108 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 244.9581 to 261.8337 deg, Dec -23.2408 to -12.5108 deg
Loaded 6041 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4269 out of 4396 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4396 out of 6602 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.624800
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.624800
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.13
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.49
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.49
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 6602 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 244.9581 to 261.8337 deg, Dec -23.2408 to -12.5108 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 244.9581 to 261.8337 deg, Dec -23.2408 to -12.5108 deg
Loaded 6041 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4269 out of 4396 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4396 out of 6602 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits (aperture=6.4)
Read 7698 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 244.4593 to 261.6825 deg, Dec -23.5868 to -12.1003 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 244.4593 to 261.6825 deg, Dec -23.5868 to -12.1003 deg
Loaded 6563 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4621 out of 4787 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4787 out of 7698 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits (aperture=5.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 5 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
2.2 pix Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
2.5 pix fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-21-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits
2.5 pix fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.5 mag. Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
14.8 mag. Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-21-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.4 (SNR ) 11.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.uZZlKuvpBw (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-08_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_002311_TTUQ2b1x1_2671510_riR584qb/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=378, passed=6602
Got 6602 stars (including 6214 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6602 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.2 to -12.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 921 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6406 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.2 to -12.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6404 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6404 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.63"
Excluding outliers - 947 stars left (next iteration limit 1041)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits -region wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.wlXMOpmJrl (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-08_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_002311_TTUQ2b1x1_2671510_riR584qb/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=483, passed=7698
Got 7698 stars (including 7205 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7698 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.6 to -12.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 926 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7485 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.6 to -12.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7484 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7484 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 944 stars left (next iteration limit 1038)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits -region wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.TICwddaMfx (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-08_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_002311_TTUQ2b1x1_2671510_riR584qb/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_002311_TTUQ2b1x1_2671510_riR584qb/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-21-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_002311_TTUQ2b1x1_2671510_riR584qb/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-21-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_002311_TTUQ2b1x1_2671510_riR584qb/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-21-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_002311_TTUQ2b1x1_2671510_riR584qb/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-21-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_002311_TTUQ2b1x1_2671510_riR584qb/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-21-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_002311_TTUQ2b1x1_2671510_riR584qb/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-21-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-21-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-21-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-21-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-21-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-21-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-21-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-21-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_002311_TTUQ2b1x1_2671510_riR584qb/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-21-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-21-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=291, passed=5679
Got 5679 stars (including 5381 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-21-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5679 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013035 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010428 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 921 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.66"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5561 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.67"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5562 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.68"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5562 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.72"
Excluding outliers - 941 stars left (next iteration limit 1035)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-21-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-21-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_002311_TTUQ2b1x1_2671510_riR584qb/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-21-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-21-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-21-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.UiD1k1r28K (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-08_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_002311_TTUQ2b1x1_2671510_riR584qb/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_002311_TTUQ2b1x1_2671510_riR584qb/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_002311_TTUQ2b1x1_2671510_riR584qb/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_002311_TTUQ2b1x1_2671510_riR584qb/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_002311_TTUQ2b1x1_2671510_riR584qb/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_002311_TTUQ2b1x1_2671510_riR584qb/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_002311_TTUQ2b1x1_2671510_riR584qb/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_002311_TTUQ2b1x1_2671510_riR584qb/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=290, passed=5750
Got 5750 stars (including 5455 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5750 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013033 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010427 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 918 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.64"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5595 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.66"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5595 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.66"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5595 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.71"
Excluding outliers - 941 stars left (next iteration limit 1035)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_002311_TTUQ2b1x1_2671510_riR584qb/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-21-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-21-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_002311_TTUQ2b1x1_2671510_riR584qb/wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-21-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_002311_TTUQ2b1x1_2671510_riR584qb/wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Oph-07-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:49:02.07 -20:49:07.1: 15.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:49:02.07 -20:49:07.1: 15.25 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out21116.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 6s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21116_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164
Preparing report for the candidate 21116_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21118_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164
The candidate 21118_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:09:39.88 -19:08:04.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20641_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164
The candidate 20641_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:44:50.03 -20:12:17.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20177_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164
The candidate 20177_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:34:15.36 -17:09:40.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03060_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164
The candidate 03060_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:07:56.51 -18:48:39.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 7s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Oph-07-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
16:49:02.07 -20:49:07.1
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_002311_TTUQ2b1x1_2671510_riR584qb/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-21-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_002311_TTUQ2b1x1_2671510_riR584qb/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_002311_TTUQ2b1x1_2671510_riR584qb/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-21-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_002311_TTUQ2b1x1_2671510_riR584qb/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-21-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-21-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
Image size: 937.6'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:53:14.795 -17:57:56.98 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-21-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-21-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits
Image size: 938.5'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:53:19.807 -17:59:51.90 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:53:14.795 -17:57:56.98
Second-epoch image center 16:53:19.807 -17:59:51.90
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0376 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164.fits
Image size: 938.4'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:53:21.594 -17:59:48.27 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:53:14.795 -17:57:56.98
Second-epoch image center 16:53:21.594 -17:59:48.27
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0410 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 16:53:19.807 -17:59:51.90
Second-epoch second image center 16:53:21.594 -17:59:48.27
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00715 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits &> /tmp/tmp.zd3zn0fOrA
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits &> /tmp/tmp.kMQDOBxRJ7
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_002311_TTUQ2b1x1_2671510_riR584qb/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-21-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits &> /tmp/tmp.MTqrC9k2Tn
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_002311_TTUQ2b1x1_2671510_riR584qb/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-21-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_002311_TTUQ2b1x1_2671510_riR584qb/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Cf9tP6GwWq
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_002311_TTUQ2b1x1_2671510_riR584qb/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits and wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits and wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits and wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits) and catalog (wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 76360 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 244.9179 to 261.8708 deg, Dec -23.2533 to -12.4729 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 244.9179 to 261.8708 deg, Dec -23.2533 to -12.4729 deg
Loaded 6087 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4580 out of 5201 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5201 out of 76360 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.389800
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.389800
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.69
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.70
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.70
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 76360 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 244.9179 to 261.8708 deg, Dec -23.2533 to -12.4729 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 244.9179 to 261.8708 deg, Dec -23.2533 to -12.4729 deg
Loaded 6087 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4580 out of 5201 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5201 out of 76360 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits (aperture=4.4)
Read 90958 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 244.4593 to 261.6928 deg, Dec -23.6085 to -12.1003 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 244.4593 to 261.6928 deg, Dec -23.6085 to -12.1003 deg
Loaded 6585 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4745 out of 5431 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5431 out of 90958 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits (aperture=4.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 62 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
2.1 pix Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
2.2 pix fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-21-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits
2.2 pix fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164.fits
2.0 pix wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.7 mag. Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
14.9 mag. Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-21-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.6 (SNR ) 14.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.zd3zn0fOrA (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-08_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_002311_TTUQ2b1x1_2671510_riR584qb/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=4634, passed=76351
Got 76351 stars (including 71611 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 76351 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 949 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 921 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 74166 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 949 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 74162 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 74161 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Excluding outliers - 949 stars left (next iteration limit 1043)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits -region wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.kMQDOBxRJ7 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-08_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_002311_TTUQ2b1x1_2671510_riR584qb/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=5325, passed=90948
Got 90948 stars (including 85458 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 90948 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 331 to 391 (Dec -23.6 to -12.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 948 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 928 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 89498 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 331 to 391 (Dec -23.6 to -12.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 89498 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 89498 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 947 stars left (next iteration limit 1041)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits -region wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.MTqrC9k2Tn (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-08_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_002311_TTUQ2b1x1_2671510_riR584qb/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_002311_TTUQ2b1x1_2671510_riR584qb/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-21-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_002311_TTUQ2b1x1_2671510_riR584qb/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-21-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_002311_TTUQ2b1x1_2671510_riR584qb/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-21-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_002311_TTUQ2b1x1_2671510_riR584qb/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-21-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_002311_TTUQ2b1x1_2671510_riR584qb/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-21-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_002311_TTUQ2b1x1_2671510_riR584qb/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-21-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-21-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-21-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-21-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-21-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-21-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-21-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-21-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_002311_TTUQ2b1x1_2671510_riR584qb/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-21-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-21-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=2842, passed=60171
Got 60171 stars (including 57260 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-21-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 60171 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013035 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010428 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 930 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.66"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 59250 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.62"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 59249 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.62"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 59249 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.66"
Excluding outliers - 944 stars left (next iteration limit 1038)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-21-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-21-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_002311_TTUQ2b1x1_2671510_riR584qb/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-21-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-21-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-21-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Cf9tP6GwWq (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-08_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_002311_TTUQ2b1x1_2671510_riR584qb/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_002311_TTUQ2b1x1_2671510_riR584qb/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_002311_TTUQ2b1x1_2671510_riR584qb/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_002311_TTUQ2b1x1_2671510_riR584qb/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_002311_TTUQ2b1x1_2671510_riR584qb/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_002311_TTUQ2b1x1_2671510_riR584qb/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_002311_TTUQ2b1x1_2671510_riR584qb/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_002311_TTUQ2b1x1_2671510_riR584qb/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=2921, passed=59734
Got 59734 stars (including 56756 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 59734 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013033 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010427 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 926 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.66"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 58770 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.62"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 58772 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.62"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 58773 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.66"
Excluding outliers - 945 stars left (next iteration limit 1039)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_002311_TTUQ2b1x1_2671510_riR584qb/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-21-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_002311_TTUQ2b1x1_2671510_riR584qb/wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-21-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_002311_TTUQ2b1x1_2671510_riR584qb/wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Oph-07-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:57:19.67 -19:03:15.4: 14.51 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:55:28.17 -21:36:22.2: 12.81 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 17:02:43.42 -14:35:02.4: 15.39 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:30:19.61 -15:38:18.7: 12.87 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:48:17.30 -15:53:09.3: 15.40 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:55:43.63 -16:41:36.5: 12.58 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:57:19.67 -19:03:15.4: 14.31 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.38 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:57:19.67 -19:03:15.4: ref_mag=14.38 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.3749 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 17:02:43.42 -14:35:02.4: 15.56 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:55:28.17 -21:36:22.2: 12.88 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:30:19.61 -15:38:18.7: 12.55 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.85 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.65 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:55:28.17 -21:36:22.2: ref_mag=12.85 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0582 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:30:19.61 -15:38:18.7: ref_mag=12.65 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0549 delta=-0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:48:17.30 -15:53:09.3: 15.60 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:55:43.63 -16:41:36.5: 12.78 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.68 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:55:43.63 -16:41:36.5: ref_mag=12.68 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9287 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:38:15.10 -18:30:31.5: 13.49 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:31:33.95 -17:42:50.2: 13.88 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 17:03:09.00 -15:54:43.2: 15.22 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:28:23.66 -16:42:44.5: 14.16 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:31:37.40 -20:51:29.3: 14.49 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 17:03:09.00 -15:54:43.2: 15.43 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:31:33.95 -17:42:50.2: 13.74 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.79 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:31:33.95 -17:42:50.2: ref_mag=13.79 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.9741 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:38:15.10 -18:30:31.5: 13.48 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.49 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:38:15.10 -18:30:31.5: ref_mag=13.49 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9196 delta=-0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 17:09:23.98 -20:24:47.8: 14.09 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 17:10:15.04 -19:06:08.0: 15.20 +/- 0.35 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:52:55.67 -20:06:36.7: 14.32 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:28:23.66 -16:42:44.5: 14.16 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.16 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:31:37.40 -20:51:29.3: 14.18 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:28:23.66 -16:42:44.5: ref_mag=14.16 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.2268 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.27 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:31:37.40 -20:51:29.3: ref_mag=14.27 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.9963 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 17:09:23.98 -20:24:47.8: 14.32 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.20 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:09:23.98 -20:24:47.8: ref_mag=14.20 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.8691 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 17:10:15.04 -19:06:08.0: 15.14 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:52:55.67 -20:06:36.7: 14.17 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.16 +/- 0.21
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.22 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:52:55.67 -20:06:36.7: ref_mag=14.22 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.0760 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 17:10:15.04 -19:06:08.0: ref_mag=15.16 +/- 0.21 new_mean_mag=13.7673 delta=1.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:50:56.56 -16:17:33.2: 14.19 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:27:00.21 -20:27:54.0: 14.74 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:50:56.56 -16:17:33.2: 14.20 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:50:48.41 -14:35:21.8: 15.43 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.20 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:50:56.56 -16:17:33.2: ref_mag=14.20 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.2205 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:53:07.66 -22:03:42.9: 14.28 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:24:50.67 -21:29:50.6: 14.39 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:27:00.21 -20:27:54.0: 14.42 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.52 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:27:00.21 -20:27:54.0: ref_mag=14.52 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.2987 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:50:48.41 -14:35:21.8: 15.65 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:48:18.86 -17:38:13.1: 15.30 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:53:07.66 -22:03:42.9: 14.09 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.15 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:53:07.66 -22:03:42.9: ref_mag=14.15 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.0652 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:24:50.67 -21:29:50.6: 14.10 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.17 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:24:50.67 -21:29:50.6: ref_mag=14.17 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.1406 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 17:12:04.41 -19:52:47.7: 14.09 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:48:18.86 -17:38:13.1: 15.52 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:34:15.45 -21:55:17.3: 14.25 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:55:05.40 -19:51:39.1: 14.51 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 17:12:04.41 -19:52:47.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.09 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:12:04.41 -19:52:47.7: ref_mag=14.09 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.9272 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 17:00:20.85 -15:35:15.4: 14.59 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 17:00:53.90 -16:45:06.5: 14.28 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:34:15.45 -21:55:17.3: 14.42 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.34 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:34:15.45 -21:55:17.3: ref_mag=14.34 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.2736 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:53:37.88 -20:39:50.4: 14.59 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:55:05.40 -19:51:39.1: 14.26 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.34 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:55:05.40 -19:51:39.1: ref_mag=14.34 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.2162 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 17:00:20.85 -15:35:15.4: 14.41 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.47 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:00:20.85 -15:35:15.4: ref_mag=14.47 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.3177 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 17:00:53.90 -16:45:06.5: 14.24 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.26 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:00:53.90 -16:45:06.5: ref_mag=14.26 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.1394 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:53:37.88 -20:39:50.4: 14.75 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.67 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:53:37.88 -20:39:50.4: ref_mag=14.67 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.3618 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 17:06:31.53 -18:05:19.4: 13.88 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 17:06:31.53 -18:05:19.4: 13.90 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.89 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 17:06:31.53 -18:05:19.4: ref_mag=13.89 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=12.8044 delta=1.09 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out103264.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out103313.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out103192.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out103227.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out103365.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out103377.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out41466.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 10s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103120_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164
The candidate 103120_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103124_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164
The candidate 103124_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:07:49.56 -17:33:36.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103150_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164
The candidate 103150_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:48:12.69 -20:10:31.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103168_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164
The candidate 103168_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103175_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164
The candidate 103175_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:05:44.19 -20:06:05.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103176_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164
The candidate 103176_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103182_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164
The candidate 103182_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:49:02.06 -20:49:06.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103192_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164
Preparing report for the candidate 103192_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103199_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164
The candidate 103199_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:11:46.27 -18:21:00.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103200_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164
The candidate 103200_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:04:47.21 -20:30:55.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103205_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164
The candidate 103205_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:05:34.80 -22:03:55.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103209_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164
The candidate 103209_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103217_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164
The candidate 103217_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:07:27.40 -19:15:00.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103220_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164
The candidate 103220_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:46:52.18 -20:05:53.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103227_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164
Preparing report for the candidate 103227_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103229_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164
The candidate 103229_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:11:04.87 -16:39:00.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103232_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164
The candidate 103232_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:51:13.51 -20:44:10.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103235_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164
The candidate 103235_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:10:56.39 -16:08:08.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103238_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164
The candidate 103238_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:56:19.41 -21:21:14.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103245_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164
The candidate 103245_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:12:23.48 -20:33:55.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103247_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164
The candidate 103247_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:04:29.23 -18:07:35.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103250_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164
The candidate 103250_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:56:16.20 -15:22:48.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103256_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164
The candidate 103256_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:09:11.75 -15:17:49.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103259_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164
The candidate 103259_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:47:02.40 -20:30:49.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103261_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164
The candidate 103261_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103264_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164
The candidate 103264_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:03:09.00 -15:54:43.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.72, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.70)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.763 4138939586635972864 255.78763238652 -15.91183038245 13.6748 11.5456 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.763#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103266_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164
The candidate 103266_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103273_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164
The candidate 103273_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:25:49.77 -21:43:43.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103274_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164
The candidate 103274_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103287_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164
The candidate 103287_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:12:22.04 -20:46:49.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103299_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164
The candidate 103299_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103303_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164
The candidate 103303_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103313_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164
The candidate 103313_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:10:15.04 -19:06:08.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.77, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.75)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.593 4128550163822158848 257.56278320378 -19.10209982784 12.2643 10.5816 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.593#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103317_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164
The candidate 103317_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103334_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164
The candidate 103334_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103336_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164
The candidate 103336_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:54:15.29 -14:22:03.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103337_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164
The candidate 103337_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:09:21.72 -16:18:20.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103347_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164
The candidate 103347_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103365_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164
Preparing report for the candidate 103365_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103370_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164
The candidate 103370_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:56:59.63 -14:57:29.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103374_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164
The candidate 103374_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103376_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164
The candidate 103376_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103377_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164
Preparing report for the candidate 103377_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103381_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164
The candidate 103381_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:11:43.78 -20:53:33.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103390_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164
The candidate 103390_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103397_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164
The candidate 103397_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103430_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164
The candidate 103430_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103444_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164
The candidate 103444_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103450_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164
The candidate 103450_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103510_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164
The candidate 103510_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34085_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164
The candidate 34085_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:07:56.50 -18:48:39.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50122_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164
The candidate 50122_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:34:15.37 -17:09:40.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 42070_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164
The candidate 42070_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:25:37.66 -18:06:10.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31039_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164
The candidate 31039_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:09:39.87 -19:08:04.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89638_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164
The candidate 89638_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:10:51.64 -18:32:13.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89327_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164
The candidate 89327_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:59:20.00 -20:59:17.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88925_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164
The candidate 88925_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:42:08.15 -20:30:47.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70330_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164
The candidate 70330_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:03:07.25 -15:27:16.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22381_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164
The candidate 22381_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:44:50.04 -20:12:16.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 13120_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164
The candidate 13120_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:09:29.94 -21:07:05.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 41466_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164
Preparing report for the candidate 41466_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 10122_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164
The candidate 10122_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-22-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0164 did not pass the final checks
