This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_002058_TTUQ1b1x1_2558296_Au9CibbH
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 08.2221 2461168.7221 13.54 11:31:01.97 -08:51:38.9
271.70814 49.07468 galactic Crt Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 4.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.639 Latona -0 1 1 13.8 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 11:31:01.97 -08:51:38.9: 15.58 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 11:31:01.97 -08:51:38.9: 15.59 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461168.7221,13.54,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260508.2221 13.54CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 08.2221 2461168.7221 13.62 12:26:22.46 -09:36:23.5
292.68736 52.76596 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 3.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.509 Iolanda -0 1 1 13.7 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 12:26:22.46 -09:36:23.5: 15.56 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 12:26:22.46 -09:36:23.5: 15.58 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 08.2221* 12 26 22.46 -09 36 23.5 13.6 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461168.7221,13.62,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260508.2221 13.62CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 08.2221 2461168.7221 13.67 11:36:42.27 -08:18:17.6
273.24314 50.20909 galactic Crt Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 3.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.227 Philosophia 0 1 1 13.5 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 11:36:42.27 -08:18:17.6: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 11:36:42.27 -08:18:17.6: 15.73 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461168.7221,13.67,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260508.2221 13.67CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 08.2221 2461168.7221 13.82 12:18:52.89 -12:05:18.7
290.49585 49.99546 galactic Crv Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 4.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.36 Atalante 1 0 1 14.0 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 12:18:52.89 -12:05:18.7: 15.63 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 12:18:52.89 -12:05:18.7: 15.65 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461168.7221,13.82,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260508.2221 13.82CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 08.2221 2461168.7221 14.21 11:38:58.93 -05:01:40.5
271.64847 53.38512 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.5" and 4.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.193 Ambrosia 1 0 1 14.5 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 11:38:58.93 -05:01:40.5: 15.69 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 11:38:58.93 -05:01:40.5: 15.73 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 08.2221* 11 38 58.93 -05 01 40.5 14.2 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461168.7221,14.21,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260508.2221 14.21CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461147.76570362 17.04.2026 06:22:26.793 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
First image: 2461147.76570362 17.04.2026 06:22:26.793 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
Last image: 2461168.72241602 08.05.2026 05:20:06.744 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_002058_TTUQ1b1x1_2558296_Au9CibbH/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 3
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.68
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 2 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 5606
Objects passed selection criteria: 5604
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.8 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.8 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 5448.25
Average stars matched: 5268 (96.6916 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 111520 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed May 6 12:14:36 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-43-g0c21e0c3
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri May 8 00:22:25 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461147.76570362 17.04.2026 06:22:26.793 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
First image: 2461147.76570362 17.04.2026 06:22:26.793 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
Last image: 2461168.72241602 08.05.2026 05:20:06.744 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_002058_TTUQ1b1x1_2558296_Au9CibbH/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 88
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.41
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 11 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 34468
Objects passed selection criteria: 34382
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.8 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 33373.5
Average stars matched: 32027.8 (95.9676 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 135384 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed May 6 12:14:36 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-43-g0c21e0c3
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri May 8 00:23:46 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_002058_TTUQ1b1x1_2558296_Au9CibbH/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-19-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0244.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_002058_TTUQ1b1x1_2558296_Au9CibbH/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_002058_TTUQ1b1x1_2558296_Au9CibbH/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-19-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0244.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_002058_TTUQ1b1x1_2558296_Au9CibbH/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461168.72174536
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits'
wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits'
wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-19-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0244.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-19-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0244.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-19-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0244.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-19-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0244.fits'
wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:00:03.184 -10:00:19.72 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-19-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0244.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-19-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0244.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:00:20.535 -10:00:53.63 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 12:00:03.184 -10:00:19.72
Second-epoch image center 12:00:20.535 -10:00:53.63
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0718 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:00:21.869 -10:01:05.84 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 12:00:03.184 -10:00:19.72
Second-epoch image center 12:00:21.869 -10:01:05.84
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0777 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 12:00:20.535 -10:00:53.63
Second-epoch second image center 12:00:21.869 -10:01:05.84
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00644 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits &> /tmp/tmp.CLPrjK7YLm
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits &> /tmp/tmp.wG8QPR94N1
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_002058_TTUQ1b1x1_2558296_Au9CibbH/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-19-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0244.fits &> /tmp/tmp.fCQ2UnI9Hw
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_002058_TTUQ1b1x1_2558296_Au9CibbH/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-19-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0244.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_002058_TTUQ1b1x1_2558296_Au9CibbH/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Woj7mskLoz
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_002058_TTUQ1b1x1_2558296_Au9CibbH/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits and wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits and wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits and wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits) and catalog (wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 5414 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 171.6120 to 188.1907 deg, Dec -15.6584 to -4.2135 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 171.6120 to 188.1907 deg, Dec -15.6584 to -4.2135 deg
Loaded 4776 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3415 out of 3518 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3518 out of 5414 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.685200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.685200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.68
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.01
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.01
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 5414 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 171.6120 to 188.1907 deg, Dec -15.6584 to -4.2135 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 171.6120 to 188.1907 deg, Dec -15.6584 to -4.2135 deg
Loaded 4776 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3415 out of 3518 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3518 out of 5414 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits (aperture=5.9)
Read 5369 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 171.6120 to 188.1907 deg, Dec -15.6584 to -4.2135 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 171.6120 to 188.1907 deg, Dec -15.6584 to -4.2135 deg
Loaded 4776 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3416 out of 3512 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3512 out of 5369 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits (aperture=5.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 2 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
2.1 pix Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
2.4 pix fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-19-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0244.fits
2.3 pix fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.0 mag. Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
15.0 mag. Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-19-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0244.fits
14.9 mag. fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.9 (SNR ) 12.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.CLPrjK7YLm (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-08_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_002058_TTUQ1b1x1_2558296_Au9CibbH/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=373, passed=5414
Got 5414 stars (including 5029 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5414 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.7 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 965 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5366 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.7 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5367 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5367 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 971 stars left (next iteration limit 1068)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits -region wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.wG8QPR94N1 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-08_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_002058_TTUQ1b1x1_2558296_Au9CibbH/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=356, passed=5369
Got 5369 stars (including 5000 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5369 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.7 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 964 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5325 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.7 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5327 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5327 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 970 stars left (next iteration limit 1067)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits -region wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.fCQ2UnI9Hw (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-08_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_002058_TTUQ1b1x1_2558296_Au9CibbH/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_002058_TTUQ1b1x1_2558296_Au9CibbH/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-19-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0244.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_002058_TTUQ1b1x1_2558296_Au9CibbH/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-19-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0244.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_002058_TTUQ1b1x1_2558296_Au9CibbH/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-19-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0244.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_002058_TTUQ1b1x1_2558296_Au9CibbH/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-19-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0244.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_002058_TTUQ1b1x1_2558296_Au9CibbH/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-19-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0244.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_002058_TTUQ1b1x1_2558296_Au9CibbH/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-19-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0244.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-19-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0244.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-19-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0244.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-19-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0244.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-19-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0244.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-19-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0244.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-19-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0244.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-19-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0244.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_002058_TTUQ1b1x1_2558296_Au9CibbH/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-19-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0244.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-19-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0244.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=389, passed=5585
Got 5585 stars (including 5191 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-19-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0244.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5585 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 969 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5530 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5529 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5529 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 973 stars left (next iteration limit 1070)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-19-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0244.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-19-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0244.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_002058_TTUQ1b1x1_2558296_Au9CibbH/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-19-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0244.fits -region wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-19-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0244.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-19-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0244.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Woj7mskLoz (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-08_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_002058_TTUQ1b1x1_2558296_Au9CibbH/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_002058_TTUQ1b1x1_2558296_Au9CibbH/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_002058_TTUQ1b1x1_2558296_Au9CibbH/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_002058_TTUQ1b1x1_2558296_Au9CibbH/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_002058_TTUQ1b1x1_2558296_Au9CibbH/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_002058_TTUQ1b1x1_2558296_Au9CibbH/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_002058_TTUQ1b1x1_2558296_Au9CibbH/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_002058_TTUQ1b1x1_2558296_Au9CibbH/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=378, passed=5607
Got 5607 stars (including 5222 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5607 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 965 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5560 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5561 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5561 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 972 stars left (next iteration limit 1069)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_002058_TTUQ1b1x1_2558296_Au9CibbH/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245.fits -region wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-19-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0244.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-19-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0244.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_002058_TTUQ1b1x1_2558296_Au9CibbH/wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-19-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0244.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_002058_TTUQ1b1x1_2558296_Au9CibbH/wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Vir-10-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 12:04:10.45 -10:38:23.2: 12.05 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 12:12:30.75 -07:37:11.9: 11.97 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 12:04:10.45 -10:38:23.2: 12.08 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 12:12:30.75 -07:37:11.9: 11.97 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.07 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:04:10.45 -10:38:23.2: ref_mag=12.07 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0860 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.97 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:12:30.75 -07:37:11.9: ref_mag=11.97 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9754 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20344_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245
The candidate 20344_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20351_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245
The candidate 20351_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245 did not pass the final checks
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Vir-10-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_002058_TTUQ1b1x1_2558296_Au9CibbH/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-19-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0244.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_002058_TTUQ1b1x1_2558296_Au9CibbH/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_002058_TTUQ1b1x1_2558296_Au9CibbH/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-19-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0244.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_002058_TTUQ1b1x1_2558296_Au9CibbH/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-19-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0244.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-19-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0244.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:00:03.184 -10:00:19.72 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-19-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0244.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-19-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0244.fits
util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Image size: 941.4'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:00:20.535 -10:00:53.63 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 12:00:03.184 -10:00:19.72
Second-epoch image center 12:00:20.535 -10:00:53.63
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0718 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:00:21.869 -10:01:05.84 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 12:00:03.184 -10:00:19.72
Second-epoch image center 12:00:21.869 -10:01:05.84
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0777 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 12:00:20.535 -10:00:53.63
Second-epoch second image center 12:00:21.869 -10:01:05.84
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00644 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits &> /tmp/tmp.3tmEfBJVqO
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits &> /tmp/tmp.0tYoMY1J7t
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_002058_TTUQ1b1x1_2558296_Au9CibbH/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-19-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0244.fits &> /tmp/tmp.MFsOTFJb6O
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_002058_TTUQ1b1x1_2558296_Au9CibbH/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-19-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0244.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_002058_TTUQ1b1x1_2558296_Au9CibbH/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245.fits &> /tmp/tmp.WGGw5Dh4OT
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_002058_TTUQ1b1x1_2558296_Au9CibbH/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits and wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits and wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits and wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits) and catalog (wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 33704 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 171.5751 to 188.2422 deg, Dec -15.6756 to -4.1628 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 171.5751 to 188.2422 deg, Dec -15.6756 to -4.1628 deg
Loaded 4830 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3511 out of 3743 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3743 out of 33704 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.569300
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.569300
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.41
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.16
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.16
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 33704 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 171.5751 to 188.2422 deg, Dec -15.6756 to -4.1628 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 171.5751 to 188.2422 deg, Dec -15.6756 to -4.1628 deg
Loaded 4830 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3511 out of 3743 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3743 out of 33704 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits (aperture=4.6)
Read 33871 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 171.5750 to 188.2422 deg, Dec -15.6584 to -4.1581 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 171.5750 to 188.2422 deg, Dec -15.6584 to -4.1581 deg
Loaded 4822 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3516 out of 3745 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3745 out of 33871 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits (aperture=4.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 76 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
2.0 pix Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
2.1 pix fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-19-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0244.fits
2.1 pix fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245.fits
2.0 pix wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
2.0 pix wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
15.2 mag. Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
15.1 mag. fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-19-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0244.fits
15.1 mag. fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.1 (SNR ) 14.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.3tmEfBJVqO (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-08_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_002058_TTUQ1b1x1_2558296_Au9CibbH/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=1232, passed=33691
Got 33691 stars (including 32410 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 33691 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 431 (Dec -15.7 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 964 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33453 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 431 (Dec -15.7 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33452 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33452 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 971 stars left (next iteration limit 1068)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits -region wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.0tYoMY1J7t (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-08_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_002058_TTUQ1b1x1_2558296_Au9CibbH/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=1199, passed=33862
Got 33862 stars (including 32597 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 33862 stars from the SExtractor catalog
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-08_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_002058_TTUQ1b1x1_2558296_Au9CibbH/util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 431 (Dec -15.7 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 968 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33593 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 431 (Dec -15.7 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33592 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33592 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 973 stars left (next iteration limit 1070)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits -region wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.MFsOTFJb6O (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-08_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_002058_TTUQ1b1x1_2558296_Au9CibbH/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_002058_TTUQ1b1x1_2558296_Au9CibbH/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-19-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0244.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_002058_TTUQ1b1x1_2558296_Au9CibbH/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-19-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0244.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_002058_TTUQ1b1x1_2558296_Au9CibbH/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-19-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0244.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_002058_TTUQ1b1x1_2558296_Au9CibbH/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-19-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0244.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_002058_TTUQ1b1x1_2558296_Au9CibbH/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-19-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0244.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_002058_TTUQ1b1x1_2558296_Au9CibbH/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-19-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0244.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-19-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0244.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-19-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0244.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-19-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0244.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-19-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0244.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-19-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0244.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-19-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0244.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-19-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0244.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_002058_TTUQ1b1x1_2558296_Au9CibbH/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-19-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0244.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-19-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0244.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=20, blended=1400, passed=33630
Got 33630 stars (including 32180 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-19-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0244.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 33630 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 967 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33364 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33365 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33365 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 973 stars left (next iteration limit 1070)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-19-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0244.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-19-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0244.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_002058_TTUQ1b1x1_2558296_Au9CibbH/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-19-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0244.fits -region wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-19-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0244.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-19-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0244.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.WGGw5Dh4OT (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-08_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_002058_TTUQ1b1x1_2558296_Au9CibbH/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_002058_TTUQ1b1x1_2558296_Au9CibbH/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_002058_TTUQ1b1x1_2558296_Au9CibbH/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_002058_TTUQ1b1x1_2558296_Au9CibbH/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_002058_TTUQ1b1x1_2558296_Au9CibbH/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_002058_TTUQ1b1x1_2558296_Au9CibbH/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_002058_TTUQ1b1x1_2558296_Au9CibbH/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_002058_TTUQ1b1x1_2558296_Au9CibbH/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=22, blended=1396, passed=33552
Got 33552 stars (including 32101 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 33552 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 967 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33275 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33274 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33274 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 972 stars left (next iteration limit 1069)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_002058_TTUQ1b1x1_2558296_Au9CibbH/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245.fits -region wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-19-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0244.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_002058_TTUQ1b1x1_2558296_Au9CibbH/wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-19-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0244.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_002058_TTUQ1b1x1_2558296_Au9CibbH/wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Vir-10-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 11:31:01.97 -08:51:38.9: 15.58 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 12:03:21.90 -15:09:51.5: 13.69 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 11:46:06.90 -11:33:34.7: 12.81 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 12:06:25.81 -06:39:09.5: 14.13 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 11:42:22.47 -14:35:11.5: 13.97 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 12:08:14.34 -13:35:00.4: 13.95 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 11:36:42.27 -08:18:17.6: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 12:26:22.46 -09:36:23.5: 15.56 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 12:18:52.89 -12:05:18.7: 15.63 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 11:38:58.93 -05:01:40.5: 15.69 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 11:31:01.97 -08:51:38.9: 15.59 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 12:06:25.81 -06:39:09.5: 14.26 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 11:46:06.90 -11:33:34.7: 12.80 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 11:42:22.47 -14:35:11.5: 13.94 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 12:03:21.90 -15:09:51.5: 13.71 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.19 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 12:08:14.34 -13:35:00.4: 13.84 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.70 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.80 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:06:25.81 -06:39:09.5: ref_mag=14.19 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.5481 delta=-0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.95 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:03:21.90 -15:09:51.5: ref_mag=13.70 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8786 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:46:06.90 -11:33:34.7: ref_mag=12.80 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1459 delta=-0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:42:22.47 -14:35:11.5: ref_mag=13.95 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.0255 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.89 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:08:14.34 -13:35:00.4: ref_mag=13.89 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.0874 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 11:36:42.27 -08:18:17.6: 15.73 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 11:38:58.93 -05:01:40.5: 15.73 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 12:26:22.46 -09:36:23.5: 15.58 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 12:18:52.89 -12:05:18.7: 15.65 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 12:25:54.64 -15:25:48.1: 14.67 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 12:27:23.65 -11:16:40.4: 14.87 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 12:28:36.63 -11:44:10.5: 14.90 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 12:28:23.71 -12:24:41.1: 14.87 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 12:20:46.69 -14:05:24.3: 14.72 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 12:27:23.65 -11:16:40.4: 14.65 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 12:28:23.71 -12:24:41.1: 15.18 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 12:28:36.63 -11:44:10.5: 14.76 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 12:25:54.64 -15:25:48.1: 14.69 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.73 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.98 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.83 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:27:23.65 -11:16:40.4: ref_mag=14.73 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.3350 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:28:23.71 -12:24:41.1: ref_mag=14.98 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=14.3709 delta=0.61 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.68 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:28:36.63 -11:44:10.5: ref_mag=14.83 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.5147 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:25:54.64 -15:25:48.1: ref_mag=14.68 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.4688 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 12:20:46.69 -14:05:24.3: 14.60 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.66 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:20:46.69 -14:05:24.3: ref_mag=14.66 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.4525 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 12:24:22.46 -13:40:07.3: 14.68 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 12:28:05.39 -13:53:41.2: 14.45 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 12:30:05.92 -14:47:08.4: 14.66 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 12:28:47.13 -06:07:11.8: 14.72 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 12:28:05.39 -13:53:41.2: 14.73 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 12:24:22.46 -13:40:07.3: 14.77 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 12:30:05.92 -14:47:08.4: 14.76 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 12:28:47.13 -06:07:11.8: 14.79 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.56 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.75 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.71 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.73 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:28:05.39 -13:53:41.2: ref_mag=14.56 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.5481 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:28:47.13 -06:07:11.8: ref_mag=14.75 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.5114 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:30:05.92 -14:47:08.4: ref_mag=14.71 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.4669 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:24:22.46 -13:40:07.3: ref_mag=14.73 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.5490 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 12:23:47.60 -07:06:36.3: 14.94 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 12:23:47.60 -07:06:36.3: 14.88 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.91 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:23:47.60 -07:06:36.3: ref_mag=14.91 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.5277 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 12:21:58.78 -14:41:37.6: 14.56 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 12:30:30.48 -12:18:12.0: 14.52 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 11:33:50.21 -12:35:23.0: 14.69 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 12:30:19.91 -05:59:53.9: 14.92 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 12:30:19.91 -05:59:53.9: 15.05 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 12:21:58.78 -14:41:37.6: 14.76 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 11:33:50.21 -12:35:23.0: 14.60 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 12:30:30.48 -12:18:12.0: 14.81 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.98 +/- 0.18
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.63 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.64 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.64 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:30:19.91 -05:59:53.9: ref_mag=14.98 +/- 0.18 new_mean_mag=14.7063 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:33:50.21 -12:35:23.0: ref_mag=14.64 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.4388 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:30:30.48 -12:18:12.0: ref_mag=14.63 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.5920 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:21:58.78 -14:41:37.6: ref_mag=14.64 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.4172 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 11:50:59.87 -13:01:56.2: 15.01 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 11:50:59.87 -13:01:56.2: 14.82 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.90 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:50:59.87 -13:01:56.2: ref_mag=14.90 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.5834 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 12:22:54.96 -07:17:59.5: 14.84 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 12:27:40.70 -13:41:14.0: 14.93 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 12:25:17.01 -06:59:13.7: 15.43 +/- 0.32 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 12:22:54.96 -07:17:59.5: 14.96 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 12:27:40.70 -13:41:14.0: 14.54 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.90 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:22:54.96 -07:17:59.5: ref_mag=14.90 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.6476 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 12:25:17.01 -06:59:13.7: 15.05 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.67 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:27:40.70 -13:41:14.0: ref_mag=14.67 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.5841 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.17 +/- 0.18
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:25:17.01 -06:59:13.7: ref_mag=15.17 +/- 0.18 new_mean_mag=14.7054 delta=0.47 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 12:26:45.79 -12:36:56.1: 14.66 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 11:28:16.05 -13:26:11.0: 14.62 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 12:26:45.79 -12:36:56.1: 14.75 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.70 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 11:28:16.05 -13:26:11.0: 14.69 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:26:45.79 -12:36:56.1: ref_mag=14.70 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.5555 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.65 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:28:16.05 -13:26:11.0: ref_mag=14.65 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.4892 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 12:27:06.25 -05:42:09.9: 14.81 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 12:27:16.93 -14:34:44.3: 14.80 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 12:27:45.35 -08:40:38.5: 14.39 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 12:27:06.25 -05:42:09.9: 15.05 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.90 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 12:27:16.93 -14:34:44.3: 14.97 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:27:06.25 -05:42:09.9: ref_mag=14.90 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.6624 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.87 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 12:27:45.35 -08:40:38.5: 14.45 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:27:16.93 -14:34:44.3: ref_mag=14.87 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=14.5397 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.41 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:27:45.35 -08:40:38.5: ref_mag=14.41 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.5190 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 12:31:05.77 -08:22:52.8: 14.86 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 12:30:34.04 -05:27:22.2: 14.87 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 12:31:05.77 -08:22:52.8: 15.04 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 12:30:34.04 -05:27:22.2: 14.78 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.93 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.82 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:31:05.77 -08:22:52.8: ref_mag=14.93 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.6645 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:30:34.04 -05:27:22.2: ref_mag=14.82 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.5976 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 12:27:23.74 -11:29:29.7: 14.90 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 12:16:17.54 -14:15:59.7: 15.03 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 12:24:37.55 -14:39:40.8: 14.64 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 12:27:23.74 -11:29:29.7: 14.80 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 12:16:17.54 -14:15:59.7: 15.19 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.84 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:27:23.74 -11:29:29.7: ref_mag=14.84 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.5508 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 12:24:37.55 -14:39:40.8: 14.81 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.10 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:16:17.54 -14:15:59.7: ref_mag=15.10 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.6696 delta=0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.71 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:24:37.55 -14:39:40.8: ref_mag=14.71 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.5460 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 12:30:51.23 -13:06:54.7: 14.97 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 11:31:58.03 -06:51:49.1: 15.02 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 12:25:34.36 -11:05:43.6: 14.78 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 11:36:27.09 -14:38:45.5: 14.93 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 11:31:58.03 -06:51:49.1: 15.42 +/- 0.29 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 12:30:51.23 -13:06:54.7: 14.56 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 12:29:28.06 -08:58:45.5: 14.85 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.15 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:31:58.03 -06:51:49.1: ref_mag=15.15 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=14.6581 delta=0.49 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.69 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:30:51.23 -13:06:54.7: ref_mag=14.69 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.5012 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 12:25:34.36 -11:05:43.6: 14.74 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 11:36:27.09 -14:38:45.5: 14.92 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.76 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.92 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:36:27.09 -14:38:45.5: ref_mag=14.92 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.6448 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:25:34.36 -11:05:43.6: ref_mag=14.76 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.7720 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 12:29:28.06 -08:58:45.5: 14.89 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.87 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:29:28.06 -08:58:45.5: ref_mag=14.87 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.5064 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 11:34:40.49 -13:47:21.2: 14.67 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 11:37:34.90 -13:01:30.8: 15.00 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 11:36:45.81 -06:41:31.1: 15.15 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 11:34:40.49 -13:47:21.2: 14.54 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.60 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:34:40.49 -13:47:21.2: ref_mag=14.60 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.6650 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 11:37:34.90 -13:01:30.8: 14.79 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.87 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:37:34.90 -13:01:30.8: ref_mag=14.87 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.6205 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 11:36:45.81 -06:41:31.1: 15.10 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.13 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:36:45.81 -06:41:31.1: ref_mag=15.13 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.7703 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 12:27:25.84 -09:37:41.4: 14.42 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 12:27:25.84 -09:37:41.4: 14.44 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 12:08:31.03 -14:46:49.4: 14.86 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 12:23:26.76 -07:44:20.2: 15.06 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.43 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:27:25.84 -09:37:41.4: ref_mag=14.43 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.4207 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 12:19:21.20 -12:36:14.2: 15.12 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 11:53:53.34 -05:10:10.8: 15.25 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 12:08:31.03 -14:46:49.4: 14.84 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 12:23:26.76 -07:44:20.2: 15.20 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.85 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:08:31.03 -14:46:49.4: ref_mag=14.85 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.6801 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.13 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:23:26.76 -07:44:20.2: ref_mag=15.13 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.7931 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 11:53:53.34 -05:10:10.8: 14.70 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 12:19:21.20 -12:36:14.2: 15.06 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.83 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.09 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:53:53.34 -05:10:10.8: ref_mag=14.83 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.6753 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:19:21.20 -12:36:14.2: ref_mag=15.09 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.7467 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 12:26:14.32 -13:14:54.8: 14.79 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 12:18:22.05 -14:02:51.4: 14.62 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 12:29:48.18 -15:19:29.6: 14.63 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 12:14:50.69 -15:07:11.0: 14.47 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 11:31:10.81 -13:11:31.6: 14.64 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 12:00:18.21 -14:26:00.0: 15.03 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 11:44:23.77 -12:20:09.7: 14.74 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 12:23:10.45 -14:11:17.9: 14.87 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 12:26:14.32 -13:14:54.8: 15.26 +/- 0.30 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.92 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:26:14.32 -13:14:54.8: ref_mag=14.92 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.4745 delta=0.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 12:18:22.05 -14:02:51.4: 15.13 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 12:29:48.18 -15:19:29.6: 14.72 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.77 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 12:14:50.69 -15:07:11.0: 14.74 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.67 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:18:22.05 -14:02:51.4: ref_mag=14.77 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.5735 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:29:48.18 -15:19:29.6: ref_mag=14.67 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.6127 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.57 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:14:50.69 -15:07:11.0: ref_mag=14.57 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.5323 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 11:31:10.81 -13:11:31.6: 15.06 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.77 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:31:10.81 -13:11:31.6: ref_mag=14.77 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.6345 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 11:28:22.67 -12:29:45.8: 14.85 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 11:32:49.04 -10:37:38.7: 15.29 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 12:00:18.21 -14:26:00.0: 14.84 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 11:44:23.77 -12:20:09.7: 14.74 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 12:23:10.45 -14:11:17.9: 14.68 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.92 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:00:18.21 -14:26:00.0: ref_mag=14.92 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.6160 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.74 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:44:23.77 -12:20:09.7: ref_mag=14.74 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.6417 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.76 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:23:10.45 -14:11:17.9: ref_mag=14.76 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.6222 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 11:28:22.67 -12:29:45.8: 14.90 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.87 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:28:22.67 -12:29:45.8: ref_mag=14.87 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.6030 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 11:32:49.04 -10:37:38.7: 14.76 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.91 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:32:49.04 -10:37:38.7: ref_mag=14.91 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.7167 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 11:34:26.17 -09:32:50.2: 14.90 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-22-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0157.fits at 11:46:01.40 -14:08:37.8: 14.83 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 11:34:26.17 -09:32:50.2: 15.09 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-23-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits at 11:46:01.40 -14:08:37.8: 15.02 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.97 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.91 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:34:26.17 -09:32:50.2: ref_mag=14.97 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.8342 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:46:01.40 -14:08:37.8: ref_mag=14.91 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.7402 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52812.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52814.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52822.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52836.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52900.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 7s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52642_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245
The candidate 52642_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:32:52.15 -11:50:37.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52644_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245
The candidate 52644_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52647_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245
The candidate 52647_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52649_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245
The candidate 52649_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:43:08.43 -10:38:22.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52650_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245
The candidate 52650_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52651_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245
The candidate 52651_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52653_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245
The candidate 52653_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:39:20.39 -10:37:07.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52655_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245
The candidate 52655_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52656_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245
The candidate 52656_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:41:16.51 -06:30:52.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52812_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245
Preparing report for the candidate 52812_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52814_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245
Preparing report for the candidate 52814_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52822_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245
Preparing report for the candidate 52822_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52836_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245
Preparing report for the candidate 52836_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52900_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245
Preparing report for the candidate 52900_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52905_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245
The candidate 52905_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52909_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245
The candidate 52909_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52925_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245
The candidate 52925_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52928_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245
The candidate 52928_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:29:46.27 -06:54:01.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52929_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245
The candidate 52929_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52932_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245
The candidate 52932_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52936_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245
The candidate 52936_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52938_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245
The candidate 52938_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52940_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245
The candidate 52940_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52942_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245
The candidate 52942_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52949_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245
The candidate 52949_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52977_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245
The candidate 52977_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52978_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245
The candidate 52978_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52981_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245
The candidate 52981_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52984_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245
The candidate 52984_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52985_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245
The candidate 52985_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52996_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245
The candidate 52996_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53000_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245
The candidate 53000_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53013_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245
The candidate 53013_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:17:32.26 -11:06:37.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53015_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245
The candidate 53015_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53019_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245
The candidate 53019_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:32:54.20 -07:50:58.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53027_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245
The candidate 53027_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53029_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245
The candidate 53029_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53039_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245
The candidate 53039_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53040_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245
The candidate 53040_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53041_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245
The candidate 53041_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53042_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245
The candidate 53042_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53043_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245
The candidate 53043_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53050_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245
The candidate 53050_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53057_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245
The candidate 53057_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53061_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245
The candidate 53061_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53065_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245
The candidate 53065_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53067_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245
The candidate 53067_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53072_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245
The candidate 53072_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53074_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245
The candidate 53074_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53075_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245
The candidate 53075_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53078_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245
The candidate 53078_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53083_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245
The candidate 53083_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53085_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245
The candidate 53085_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:29:25.69 -14:11:00.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53087_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245
The candidate 53087_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53089_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245
The candidate 53089_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:28:26.75 -08:18:33.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53090_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245
The candidate 53090_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:21:26.59 -14:14:54.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53091_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245
The candidate 53091_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53095_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245
The candidate 53095_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:39:53.98 -14:06:11.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53101_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245
The candidate 53101_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53102_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245
The candidate 53102_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53103_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245
The candidate 53103_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53104_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245
The candidate 53104_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53106_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245
The candidate 53106_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:38:24.37 -06:55:58.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53110_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245
The candidate 53110_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53112_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245
The candidate 53112_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53126_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245
The candidate 53126_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53134_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245
The candidate 53134_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53137_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245
The candidate 53137_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53156_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245
The candidate 53156_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:32:39.67 -14:13:42.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53158_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245
The candidate 53158_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53160_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245
The candidate 53160_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53174_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245
The candidate 53174_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53175_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245
The candidate 53175_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53178_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245
The candidate 53178_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53189_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245
The candidate 53189_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53197_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245
The candidate 53197_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-20-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245 did not pass the final checks