This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_001841_TTUQ2b1x1_2384292_YaUk6M9H
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 08.2206 2461168.7206 12.65 15:05:27.28 -22:25:56.7
339.37128 30.79425 galactic Lib Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 5.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.362 Havnia 2 -0 2 12.7 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits at 15:05:27.28 -22:25:56.7: 15.36 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 15:05:27.28 -22:25:56.7: 15.34 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461168.7206,12.65,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260508.2206 12.65CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 08.2206 2461168.7206 13.60 15:38:49.39 -24:53:17.5
344.48793 24.17430 galactic Lib Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 5.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.541 Deborah 3 -0 3 13.9 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits at 15:38:49.39 -24:53:17.5: 15.31 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 15:38:49.39 -24:53:17.5: 15.22 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461168.7206,13.60,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260508.2206 13.60CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 08.2206 2461168.7206 13.77 15:31:36.48 -22:44:26.5
344.63064 26.87945 galactic Lib Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 5.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.898 Hildegard 3 -1 3 13.5 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits at 15:31:36.48 -22:44:26.5: 15.40 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 15:31:36.48 -22:44:26.5: 15.36 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461168.7206,13.77,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260508.2206 13.77CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 08.2206 2461168.7206 14.02 15:10:02.97 -27:18:46.2
337.19465 26.18475 galactic Lib Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.1" and 5.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.684 Hildburg 2 -0 2 13.8 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits at 15:10:02.97 -27:18:46.2: 15.34 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 15:10:02.97 -27:18:46.2: 15.30 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461168.7206,14.02,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260508.2206 14.02CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461140.90679434 10.04.2026 09:45:37.031 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
First image: 2461140.90679434 10.04.2026 09:45:37.031 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
Last image: 2461168.72091376 08.05.2026 05:17:56.949 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_001841_TTUQ2b1x1_2384292_YaUk6M9H/fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 7
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.17
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 6725
Objects passed selection criteria: 6710
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 5306.5
Average stars matched: 4749.5 (89.5034 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 112176 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed May 6 12:14:36 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-43-g0c21e0c3
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri May 8 00:20:11 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461140.90679434 10.04.2026 09:45:37.031 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
First image: 2461140.90679434 10.04.2026 09:45:37.031 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
Last image: 2461168.72091376 08.05.2026 05:17:56.949 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_001841_TTUQ2b1x1_2384292_YaUk6M9H/fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 53
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.84
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 19 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 55232
Objects passed selection criteria: 55102
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 45427.5
Average stars matched: 41361.8 (91.05 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 151384 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed May 6 12:14:36 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-43-g0c21e0c3
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri May 8 00:22:00 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_001841_TTUQ2b1x1_2384292_YaUk6M9H/fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_001841_TTUQ2b1x1_2384292_YaUk6M9H/fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_001841_TTUQ2b1x1_2384292_YaUk6M9H/fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_001841_TTUQ2b1x1_2384292_YaUk6M9H/fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461168.72030225
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits'
wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits'
wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits'
wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
Image size: 941.4'x627.3' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:21:46.981 -26:00:11.01 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits
Image size: 937.5'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:21:36.021 -25:59:30.46 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:21:46.981 -26:00:11.01
Second-epoch image center 15:21:36.021 -25:59:30.46
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0426 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160.fits
Image size: 937.5'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:21:38.257 -25:59:20.65 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:21:46.981 -26:00:11.01
Second-epoch image center 15:21:38.257 -25:59:20.65
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0355 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 15:21:36.021 -25:59:30.46
Second-epoch second image center 15:21:38.257 -25:59:20.65
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00881 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits &> /tmp/tmp.5KQTWsMADf
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits &> /tmp/tmp.CkguuFanWz
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_001841_TTUQ2b1x1_2384292_YaUk6M9H/fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits &> /tmp/tmp.alrj0qbmS0
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_001841_TTUQ2b1x1_2384292_YaUk6M9H/fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_001841_TTUQ2b1x1_2384292_YaUk6M9H/fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160.fits &> /tmp/tmp.xrJtMgrREv
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_001841_TTUQ2b1x1_2384292_YaUk6M9H/fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits and wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits and wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits and wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits) and catalog (wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 7201 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 220.9749 to 239.2375 deg, Dec -31.5358 to -20.0642 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 220.9749 to 239.2375 deg, Dec -31.5358 to -20.0642 deg
Loaded 7943 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5052 out of 5263 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5263 out of 7201 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.697000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.697000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.17
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.53
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.53
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 7201 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 220.9749 to 239.2375 deg, Dec -31.5358 to -20.0642 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 220.9749 to 239.2375 deg, Dec -31.5358 to -20.0642 deg
Loaded 7943 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5052 out of 5263 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5263 out of 7201 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 7308 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 221.4484 to 239.5880 deg, Dec -31.2802 to -20.4463 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 221.4484 to 239.5880 deg, Dec -31.2802 to -20.4463 deg
Loaded 7407 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5126 out of 5277 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5277 out of 7308 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits (aperture=6.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 6 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
2.3 pix Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
2.4 pix fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits
2.4 pix fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.5 mag. Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
14.5 mag. Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
14.3 mag. fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits
14.3 mag. fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.3 (SNR ) 11.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.5KQTWsMADf (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-08_CI_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_001841_TTUQ2b1x1_2384292_YaUk6M9H/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits' -> 'wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=570, passed=7201
Got 7201 stars (including 6619 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7201 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 949 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7046 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7046 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7046 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 970 stars left (next iteration limit 1067)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits -region wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.CkguuFanWz (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-08_CI_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_001841_TTUQ2b1x1_2384292_YaUk6M9H/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits' -> 'wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=471, passed=7308
Got 7308 stars (including 6831 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7308 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 953 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7219 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7221 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7221 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Excluding outliers - 969 stars left (next iteration limit 1065)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits -region wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.alrj0qbmS0 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-08_CI_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_001841_TTUQ2b1x1_2384292_YaUk6M9H/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_001841_TTUQ2b1x1_2384292_YaUk6M9H/fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_001841_TTUQ2b1x1_2384292_YaUk6M9H/fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_001841_TTUQ2b1x1_2384292_YaUk6M9H/fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_001841_TTUQ2b1x1_2384292_YaUk6M9H/fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_001841_TTUQ2b1x1_2384292_YaUk6M9H/fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_001841_TTUQ2b1x1_2384292_YaUk6M9H/fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_001841_TTUQ2b1x1_2384292_YaUk6M9H/fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=418, passed=6641
Got 6641 stars (including 6218 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6641 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 949 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6541 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6542 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6542 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Excluding outliers - 966 stars left (next iteration limit 1062)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_001841_TTUQ2b1x1_2384292_YaUk6M9H/fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits -region wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.xrJtMgrREv (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-08_CI_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_001841_TTUQ2b1x1_2384292_YaUk6M9H/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_001841_TTUQ2b1x1_2384292_YaUk6M9H/fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_001841_TTUQ2b1x1_2384292_YaUk6M9H/fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_001841_TTUQ2b1x1_2384292_YaUk6M9H/fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_001841_TTUQ2b1x1_2384292_YaUk6M9H/fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_001841_TTUQ2b1x1_2384292_YaUk6M9H/fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_001841_TTUQ2b1x1_2384292_YaUk6M9H/fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_001841_TTUQ2b1x1_2384292_YaUk6M9H/fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=406, passed=6580
Got 6580 stars (including 6167 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6580 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 957 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6486 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6486 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6486 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Excluding outliers - 968 stars left (next iteration limit 1064)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_001841_TTUQ2b1x1_2384292_YaUk6M9H/fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160.fits -region wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_001841_TTUQ2b1x1_2384292_YaUk6M9H/wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_001841_TTUQ2b1x1_2384292_YaUk6M9H/wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Lib-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits at 15:06:23.36 -26:07:34.7: 11.65 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits at 15:31:47.12 -28:22:25.2: 11.63 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits at 15:28:34.15 -24:29:60.0: 11.62 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits at 15:25:36.76 -26:01:27.4: 11.57 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits at 15:14:43.95 -29:03:54.2: 11.44 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 15:28:34.15 -24:29:60.0: 11.64 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 15:31:47.12 -28:22:25.2: 11.60 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 15:25:36.76 -26:01:27.4: 11.56 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.63 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.62 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:28:34.15 -24:29:60.0: ref_mag=11.63 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.6201 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.57 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:31:47.12 -28:22:25.2: ref_mag=11.62 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.6493 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:25:36.76 -26:01:27.4: ref_mag=11.57 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.5563 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 15:14:43.95 -29:03:54.2: 11.41 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.43 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:14:43.95 -29:03:54.2: ref_mag=11.43 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.4343 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 15:06:23.36 -26:07:34.7: 11.66 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.66 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:06:23.36 -26:07:34.7: ref_mag=11.66 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.6024 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21617_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160
The candidate 21617_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21754_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160
The candidate 21754_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21817_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160
The candidate 21817_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21824_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160
The candidate 21824_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21829_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160
The candidate 21829_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21865_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160
The candidate 21865_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:23:14.63 -26:24:12.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Lib-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_001841_TTUQ2b1x1_2384292_YaUk6M9H/fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_001841_TTUQ2b1x1_2384292_YaUk6M9H/fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_001841_TTUQ2b1x1_2384292_YaUk6M9H/fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_001841_TTUQ2b1x1_2384292_YaUk6M9H/fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
Image size: 941.4'x627.3' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:21:46.981 -26:00:11.01 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits
Image size: 937.5'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:21:36.021 -25:59:30.46 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:21:46.981 -26:00:11.01
Second-epoch image center 15:21:36.021 -25:59:30.46
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0426 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160.fits
Image size: 937.5'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:21:38.257 -25:59:20.65 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:21:46.981 -26:00:11.01
Second-epoch image center 15:21:38.257 -25:59:20.65
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0355 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 15:21:36.021 -25:59:30.46
Second-epoch second image center 15:21:38.257 -25:59:20.65
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00881 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits &> /tmp/tmp.teO7xAM4d2
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits &> /tmp/tmp.KrUtrrqP5s
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_001841_TTUQ2b1x1_2384292_YaUk6M9H/fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits &> /tmp/tmp.phvZfePpnt
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_001841_TTUQ2b1x1_2384292_YaUk6M9H/fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_001841_TTUQ2b1x1_2384292_YaUk6M9H/fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160.fits &> /tmp/tmp.y653jjt7cU
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_001841_TTUQ2b1x1_2384292_YaUk6M9H/fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits and wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits and wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits and wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits) and catalog (wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 62827 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 220.9429 to 239.2479 deg, Dec -31.5417 to -20.0548 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 220.9429 to 239.2479 deg, Dec -31.5417 to -20.0548 deg
Loaded 7989 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5812 out of 6412 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6412 out of 62827 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.533300
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.533300
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.84
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.69
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.69
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 62827 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 220.9429 to 239.2479 deg, Dec -31.5417 to -20.0548 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 220.9429 to 239.2479 deg, Dec -31.5417 to -20.0548 deg
Loaded 7989 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5812 out of 6412 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6412 out of 62827 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits (aperture=4.4)
Read 57360 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 221.3900 to 239.5974 deg, Dec -31.2822 to -20.4459 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 221.3900 to 239.5974 deg, Dec -31.2822 to -20.4459 deg
Loaded 7433 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5759 out of 6269 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6269 out of 57360 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 46 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
2.1 pix Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
2.2 pix fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits
2.2 pix fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160.fits
2.0 pix wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.7 mag. Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
14.6 mag. Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
14.5 mag. fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits
14.5 mag. fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.5 (SNR ) 14.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.teO7xAM4d2 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-08_CI_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_001841_TTUQ2b1x1_2384292_YaUk6M9H/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits' -> 'wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=21, blended=2899, passed=62806
Got 62806 stars (including 59791 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 62806 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 949 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 61286 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 61287 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 61287 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 969 stars left (next iteration limit 1065)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits -region wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.KrUtrrqP5s (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-08_CI_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_001841_TTUQ2b1x1_2384292_YaUk6M9H/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits' -> 'wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=2875, passed=57349
Got 57349 stars (including 54374 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 57349 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 949 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 56853 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 56853 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 56853 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Excluding outliers - 967 stars left (next iteration limit 1063)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits -region wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.phvZfePpnt (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-08_CI_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_001841_TTUQ2b1x1_2384292_YaUk6M9H/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_001841_TTUQ2b1x1_2384292_YaUk6M9H/fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_001841_TTUQ2b1x1_2384292_YaUk6M9H/fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_001841_TTUQ2b1x1_2384292_YaUk6M9H/fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_001841_TTUQ2b1x1_2384292_YaUk6M9H/fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_001841_TTUQ2b1x1_2384292_YaUk6M9H/fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_001841_TTUQ2b1x1_2384292_YaUk6M9H/fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_001841_TTUQ2b1x1_2384292_YaUk6M9H/fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=2273, passed=49477
Got 49477 stars (including 47139 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 49477 stars from the SExtractor catalog
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-08_CI_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_001841_TTUQ2b1x1_2384292_YaUk6M9H/util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 952 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48885 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48883 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48883 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Excluding outliers - 967 stars left (next iteration limit 1063)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_001841_TTUQ2b1x1_2384292_YaUk6M9H/fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits -region wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.y653jjt7cU (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-08_CI_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_001841_TTUQ2b1x1_2384292_YaUk6M9H/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_001841_TTUQ2b1x1_2384292_YaUk6M9H/fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_001841_TTUQ2b1x1_2384292_YaUk6M9H/fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_001841_TTUQ2b1x1_2384292_YaUk6M9H/fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_001841_TTUQ2b1x1_2384292_YaUk6M9H/fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_001841_TTUQ2b1x1_2384292_YaUk6M9H/fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_001841_TTUQ2b1x1_2384292_YaUk6M9H/fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_001841_TTUQ2b1x1_2384292_YaUk6M9H/fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=3, blended=2345, passed=50197
Got 50197 stars (including 47792 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 50197 stars from the SExtractor catalog
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-08_CI_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_001841_TTUQ2b1x1_2384292_YaUk6M9H/util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 953 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 49533 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 49534 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 49534 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Excluding outliers - 969 stars left (next iteration limit 1065)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_001841_TTUQ2b1x1_2384292_YaUk6M9H/fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160.fits -region wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_001841_TTUQ2b1x1_2384292_YaUk6M9H/wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_001841_TTUQ2b1x1_2384292_YaUk6M9H/wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Lib-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits at 15:41:25.62 -26:32:08.6: 13.57 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits at 15:39:11.41 -28:36:16.7: 13.32 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits at 15:10:34.62 -25:32:35.8: 14.24 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits at 15:36:05.53 -22:30:00.0: 13.76 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits at 15:09:26.55 -25:08:21.2: 14.03 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits at 15:09:31.31 -24:51:56.6: 13.82 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits at 15:05:27.28 -22:25:56.7: 15.36 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 15:10:34.62 -25:32:35.8: 14.05 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 15:09:31.31 -24:51:56.6: 13.82 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 15:41:25.62 -26:32:08.6: 13.59 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 15:39:11.41 -28:36:16.7: 13.10 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 15:36:05.53 -22:30:00.0: 13.69 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 15:09:26.55 -25:08:21.2: 13.81 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.14 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.82 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.58 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.73 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.20 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:41:25.62 -26:32:08.6: ref_mag=13.58 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.8305 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:09:31.31 -24:51:56.6: ref_mag=13.82 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.9609 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:10:34.62 -25:32:35.8: ref_mag=14.14 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.1324 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.91 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:36:05.53 -22:30:00.0: ref_mag=13.73 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.8465 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:39:11.41 -28:36:16.7: ref_mag=13.20 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.4990 delta=-0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:09:26.55 -25:08:21.2: ref_mag=13.91 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.9822 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits at 15:38:49.39 -24:53:17.5: 15.31 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits at 15:21:41.64 -28:39:47.5: 13.36 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 15:05:27.28 -22:25:56.7: 15.34 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 15:38:49.39 -24:53:17.5: 15.22 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 15:21:41.64 -28:39:47.5: 13.26 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.31 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:21:41.64 -28:39:47.5: ref_mag=13.31 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.4686 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits at 15:17:29.99 -29:39:01.7: 14.14 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits at 15:28:50.94 -24:31:34.6: 13.67 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits at 15:31:36.48 -22:44:26.5: 15.40 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits at 15:01:30.00 -27:28:46.8: 14.37 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits at 15:01:09.02 -29:30:11.3: 14.61 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits at 15:01:09.00 -29:18:17.9: 14.45 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 15:31:36.48 -22:44:26.5: 15.36 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 15:28:50.94 -24:31:34.6: 13.50 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 15:17:29.99 -29:39:01.7: 14.02 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 15:01:30.00 -27:28:46.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.58 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.08 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:28:50.94 -24:31:34.6: ref_mag=13.58 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.6647 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.37 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:17:29.99 -29:39:01.7: ref_mag=14.08 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.9960 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:01:30.00 -27:28:46.8: ref_mag=14.37 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.0608 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 15:01:09.02 -29:30:11.3: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.61 +/- 0.22
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:01:09.02 -29:30:11.3: ref_mag=14.61 +/- 0.22 new_mean_mag=14.1080 delta=0.51 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits at 15:13:40.23 -29:43:51.3: 14.90 +/- 0.30 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits at 15:25:05.43 -22:02:22.0: 14.41 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 15:01:09.00 -29:18:17.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.45 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:01:09.00 -29:18:17.9: ref_mag=14.45 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=14.0180 delta=0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 15:13:40.23 -29:43:51.3: 14.07 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.22 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 15:25:05.43 -22:02:22.0: 14.16 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:13:40.23 -29:43:51.3: ref_mag=14.22 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.0210 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.26 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:25:05.43 -22:02:22.0: ref_mag=14.26 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.1159 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits at 15:32:54.59 -22:04:55.2: 15.20 +/- 0.32 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits at 15:21:29.00 -27:50:23.0: 14.08 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits at 15:22:11.82 -23:44:44.0: 14.20 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits at 15:10:02.97 -27:18:46.2: 15.34 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits at 15:36:48.22 -28:42:58.5: 14.41 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 15:21:29.00 -27:50:23.0: 14.13 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 15:32:54.59 -22:04:55.2: 14.50 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 15:22:11.82 -23:44:44.0: 14.29 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 15:10:02.97 -27:18:46.2: 15.30 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.65 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.11 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.24 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:32:54.59 -22:04:55.2: ref_mag=14.65 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.1086 delta=0.54 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:21:29.00 -27:50:23.0: ref_mag=14.11 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.0583 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:22:11.82 -23:44:44.0: ref_mag=14.24 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.1496 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits at 15:00:31.77 -28:41:11.0: 14.69 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits at 15:40:43.01 -22:05:15.0: 14.43 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 15:36:48.22 -28:42:58.5: 14.13 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.24 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:36:48.22 -28:42:58.5: ref_mag=14.24 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.0281 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 15:40:43.01 -22:05:15.0: 14.92 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 15:00:31.77 -28:41:11.0: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.69 +/- 0.22
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.55 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:00:31.77 -28:41:11.0: ref_mag=14.69 +/- 0.22 new_mean_mag=14.1034 delta=0.59 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:40:43.01 -22:05:15.0: ref_mag=14.55 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.1502 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits at 15:00:58.59 -28:28:28.4: 14.51 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits at 15:36:13.83 -21:54:11.0: 14.77 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits at 15:16:17.88 -22:58:51.7: 15.27 +/- 0.31 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 15:00:58.59 -28:28:28.4: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 15:16:17.88 -22:58:51.7: 14.73 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 15:36:13.83 -21:54:11.0: 14.58 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.51 +/- 0.19
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits at 15:00:52.53 -28:14:36.2: 14.32 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:00:58.59 -28:28:28.4: ref_mag=14.51 +/- 0.19 new_mean_mag=14.2141 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.89 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.67 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:16:17.88 -22:58:51.7: ref_mag=14.89 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=14.4088 delta=0.48 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:36:13.83 -21:54:11.0: ref_mag=14.67 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.1922 delta=0.47 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits at 15:02:14.52 -25:35:19.1: 14.88 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits at 15:40:01.83 -23:06:42.7: 14.26 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 15:00:52.53 -28:14:36.2: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.32 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:00:52.53 -28:14:36.2: ref_mag=14.32 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.2029 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 15:02:14.52 -25:35:19.1: 14.75 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 15:40:01.83 -23:06:42.7: 14.13 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.81 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:02:14.52 -25:35:19.1: ref_mag=14.81 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.3343 delta=0.48 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.19 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:40:01.83 -23:06:42.7: ref_mag=14.19 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.1592 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits at 15:34:48.35 -23:59:34.7: 14.83 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits at 15:17:36.00 -27:47:03.7: 14.83 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits at 15:40:02.61 -21:53:09.6: 14.57 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 15:17:36.00 -27:47:03.7: 14.93 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 15:40:02.61 -21:53:09.6: 14.22 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.87 +/- 0.18
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 15:34:48.35 -23:59:34.7: 14.63 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:17:36.00 -27:47:03.7: ref_mag=14.87 +/- 0.18 new_mean_mag=14.3556 delta=0.52 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.36 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:40:02.61 -21:53:09.6: ref_mag=14.36 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.0839 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.72 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:34:48.35 -23:59:34.7: ref_mag=14.72 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.2359 delta=0.48 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits at 15:33:04.56 -23:35:01.1: 15.00 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 15:33:04.56 -23:35:01.1: 14.88 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.94 +/- 0.18
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:33:04.56 -23:35:01.1: ref_mag=14.94 +/- 0.18 new_mean_mag=14.3600 delta=0.58 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out80888.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out83866.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out84763.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out86548.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 7s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78232_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160
The candidate 78232_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78235_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160
The candidate 78235_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78236_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160
The candidate 78236_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78240_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160
The candidate 78240_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78243_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160
The candidate 78243_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78244_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160
The candidate 78244_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:07:17.24 -24:33:20.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78245_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160
The candidate 78245_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:39:09.63 -24:36:07.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78246_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160
The candidate 78246_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80231_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160
The candidate 80231_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:28:29.61 -21:48:57.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80328_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160
The candidate 80328_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:08:56.62 -26:28:00.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80888_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160
Preparing report for the candidate 80888_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81940_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160
The candidate 81940_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:31:07.35 -23:38:03.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82684_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160
The candidate 82684_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:37:42.09 -26:38:15.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82870_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160
The candidate 82870_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:33:22.89 -27:09:41.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83446_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160
The candidate 83446_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83866_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160
Preparing report for the candidate 83866_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83889_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160
The candidate 83889_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:27:02.59 -24:30:55.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83900_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160
The candidate 83900_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:27:43.42 -25:09:24.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84381_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160
The candidate 84381_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84763_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160
Preparing report for the candidate 84763_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85054_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160
The candidate 85054_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:12:37.22 -25:32:56.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85658_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160
The candidate 85658_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:02:11.36 -29:55:44.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85789_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160
The candidate 85789_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86051_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160
The candidate 86051_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86081_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160
The candidate 86081_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86233_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160
The candidate 86233_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86252_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160
The candidate 86252_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:04:45.21 -27:54:24.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86270_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160
The candidate 86270_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86308_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160
The candidate 86308_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86349_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160
The candidate 86349_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86509_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160
The candidate 86509_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86517_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160
The candidate 86517_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86548_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160
Preparing report for the candidate 86548_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86574_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160
The candidate 86574_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86632_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160
The candidate 86632_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86769_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160
The candidate 86769_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86816_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160
The candidate 86816_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86849_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160
The candidate 86849_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86870_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160
The candidate 86870_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86877_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160
The candidate 86877_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86878_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160
The candidate 86878_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86882_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160
The candidate 86882_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86911_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160
The candidate 86911_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86919_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160
The candidate 86919_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87024_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160
The candidate 87024_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87117_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160
The candidate 87117_fd_Lib-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0160 did not pass the final checks