Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461168.7152,11.72,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260508.2152 11.72CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC=
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.0
FLAT_FIELD_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-04-22_multinight.fit
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK=
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 8000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 4000
OMP_NUM_THREADS=
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN=
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 3.5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP=
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION=
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER=
HOME=
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory:
Leo-01-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Leo-01-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing Leo-01-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 641514 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 641514 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-09-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0236.png' -> 'transient_report/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-09-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0236.fits_preview.png'
Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-09-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0236.fits

renamed 'Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237.png' -> 'transient_report/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237.fits_preview.png'
Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237.fits

Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK
Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK
Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK
Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold.
----------------------------------------------
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 470.5140
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 511.8452
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1007.6196
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 502.5332
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1006.8357
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 501.9209
----------------------------------------------
INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 2.14153
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.001
----------------------------------------------
Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-04-22_multinight.fit
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= -5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= -4.9 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 18.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 17.0 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001113_TTUQ1b1x1_1795633_KJi4D5cx/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-09-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0236.fits
CCD-TEMP= -4.900000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001113_TTUQ1b1x1_1795633_KJi4D5cx/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-09-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0236.fits
SET-TEMP= -5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001113_TTUQ1b1x1_1795633_KJi4D5cx/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-09-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0236.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-05-08T00:09:14.8863724' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-05-08T05:09:14.8863724' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61168.214755625 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-05-08T05:09:24.7901846' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61168.2148702545 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP= -5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -4.9 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA = 149.999695154617 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC = 30.0001122669466 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT = 46.8341666666667 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ = 279.400277777778 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.36983606268803 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Leo-01' / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '10 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+30 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29458 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29458 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 18.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 18.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 6.2 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 49.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE= 899.19 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 17.0 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR = 30.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST= 14.801184 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD = 11.50092 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001113_TTUQ1b1x1_1795633_KJi4D5cx/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-09-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0236.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= -5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001113_TTUQ1b1x1_1795633_KJi4D5cx/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-09-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0236.fits
SET-TEMP= -5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-22.fit
CCD-TEMP= -4.900000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001113_TTUQ1b1x1_1795633_KJi4D5cx/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-09-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0236.fits
CCD-TEMP= -5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-22.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-22.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001113_TTUQ1b1x1_1795633_KJi4D5cx/d_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-09-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0236.fits :)
Spent 0.588510 seconds
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-22.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001113_TTUQ1b1x1_1795633_KJi4D5cx/d_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-09-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0236.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-04-22_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 37850.569222
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001113_TTUQ1b1x1_1795633_KJi4D5cx/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-09-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0236.fits :)
No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24504.0, right_median=28262.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-04-22_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001113_TTUQ1b1x1_1795633_KJi4D5cx/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-09-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0236.fits
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= -5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= -4.9 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 18.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 17.0 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001113_TTUQ1b1x1_1795633_KJi4D5cx/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
CCD-TEMP= -4.900000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001113_TTUQ1b1x1_1795633_KJi4D5cx/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
SET-TEMP= -5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001113_TTUQ1b1x1_1795633_KJi4D5cx/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-05-08T00:10:15.3870494' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-05-08T05:10:15.3870494' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61168.2154558683 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-05-08T05:10:25.2920586' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61168.2155705094 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP= -5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -4.9 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA = 149.999695185156 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC = 30.0001122527026 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT = 46.6283333333333 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ = 279.503055555556 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.37446050145078 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Leo-01' / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '10 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+30 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29458 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29458 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 18.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 18.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 6.2 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 49.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE= 899.19 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 17.0 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR = 30.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST= 14.801184 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD = 11.50092 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001113_TTUQ1b1x1_1795633_KJi4D5cx/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= -5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001113_TTUQ1b1x1_1795633_KJi4D5cx/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
SET-TEMP= -5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-22.fit
CCD-TEMP= -4.900000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001113_TTUQ1b1x1_1795633_KJi4D5cx/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
CCD-TEMP= -5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-22.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-22.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001113_TTUQ1b1x1_1795633_KJi4D5cx/d_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237.fits :)
Spent 0.594367 seconds
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-22.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001113_TTUQ1b1x1_1795633_KJi4D5cx/d_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-04-22_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 37850.569222
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001113_TTUQ1b1x1_1795633_KJi4D5cx/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237.fits :)
No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24504.0, right_median=28262.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-04-22_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001113_TTUQ1b1x1_1795633_KJi4D5cx/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt:
SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001113_TTUQ1b1x1_1795633_KJi4D5cx/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-09-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0236.fits
SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001113_TTUQ1b1x1_1795633_KJi4D5cx/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:
fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-09-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0236.fits

fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237.fits

Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001113_TTUQ1b1x1_1795633_KJi4D5cx/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-09-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0236.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001113_TTUQ1b1x1_1795633_KJi4D5cx/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001113_TTUQ1b1x1_1795633_KJi4D5cx/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-09-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0236.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001113_TTUQ1b1x1_1795633_KJi4D5cx/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461168.71487137
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits'
wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits'
wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-09-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0236.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-09-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0236.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-09-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0236.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-09-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0236.fits'
wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:00:00.034 +30:00:18.88 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-09-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0236.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-09-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0236.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:00:07.286 +30:00:25.30 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:00:00.034 +30:00:18.88
Second-epoch image center 10:00:07.286 +30:00:25.30
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0262 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:00:06.317 +29:59:47.86 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:00:00.034 +30:00:18.88
Second-epoch image center 10:00:06.317 +29:59:47.86
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0243 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 10:00:07.286 +30:00:25.30
Second-epoch second image center 10:00:06.317 +29:59:47.86
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01097 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits &> /tmp/tmp.7H7MGA6XX2
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits &> /tmp/tmp.lcNdSBxKFx
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001113_TTUQ1b1x1_1795633_KJi4D5cx/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-09-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0236.fits &> /tmp/tmp.oJnitHNwWA
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001113_TTUQ1b1x1_1795633_KJi4D5cx/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-09-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0236.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001113_TTUQ1b1x1_1795633_KJi4D5cx/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237.fits &> /tmp/tmp.njlzEmBiaX
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001113_TTUQ1b1x1_1795633_KJi4D5cx/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits and wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits and wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits and wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits) and catalog (wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 7322 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 140.2252 to 159.2855 deg, Dec +24.2125 to +35.3503 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 140.2252 to 159.2855 deg, Dec 24.2125 to 35.3503 deg
Loaded 5549 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4003 out of 4255 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4255 out of 7322 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.921700
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.921700
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.50
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.42
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.42
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 7322 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 140.2252 to 159.2855 deg, Dec +24.2125 to +35.3503 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 140.2252 to 159.2855 deg, Dec 24.2125 to 35.3503 deg
Loaded 5549 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4003 out of 4255 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4255 out of 7322 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits (aperture=6.4)
Read 7299 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 140.2251 to 159.2856 deg, Dec +24.2059 to +35.3397 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 140.2251 to 159.2856 deg, Dec 24.2059 to 35.3397 deg
Loaded 5551 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3994 out of 4263 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4263 out of 7299 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits (aperture=6.4)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 3 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
2.2 pix Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits
2.2 pix fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-09-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0236.fits
2.1 pix fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
15.4 mag. Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits
15.2 mag. fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-09-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0236.fits
15.2 mag. fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.2 (SNR ) 12.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.7H7MGA6XX2 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-08_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001113_TTUQ1b1x1_1795633_KJi4D5cx/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=551, passed=7322
Got 7322 stars (including 6763 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7322 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 918 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 903 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7171 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 918 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7170 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7169 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 918 stars left (next iteration limit 1009)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits -region wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.lcNdSBxKFx (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-08_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001113_TTUQ1b1x1_1795633_KJi4D5cx/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=579, passed=7299
Got 7299 stars (including 6711 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7299 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 923 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 903 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7140 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 923 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7140 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7139 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 923 stars left (next iteration limit 1015)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits -region wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.oJnitHNwWA (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-08_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001113_TTUQ1b1x1_1795633_KJi4D5cx/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001113_TTUQ1b1x1_1795633_KJi4D5cx/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-09-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0236.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001113_TTUQ1b1x1_1795633_KJi4D5cx/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-09-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0236.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001113_TTUQ1b1x1_1795633_KJi4D5cx/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-09-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0236.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001113_TTUQ1b1x1_1795633_KJi4D5cx/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-09-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0236.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001113_TTUQ1b1x1_1795633_KJi4D5cx/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-09-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0236.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001113_TTUQ1b1x1_1795633_KJi4D5cx/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-09-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0236.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-09-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0236.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-09-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0236.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-09-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0236.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-09-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0236.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-09-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0236.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-09-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0236.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-09-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0236.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001113_TTUQ1b1x1_1795633_KJi4D5cx/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-09-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0236.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-09-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0236.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=468, passed=6420
Got 6420 stars (including 5948 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-09-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0236.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6420 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 915 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 902 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6235 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 915 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6236 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6236 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 915 stars left (next iteration limit 1006)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-09-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0236.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-09-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0236.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001113_TTUQ1b1x1_1795633_KJi4D5cx/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-09-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0236.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-09-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0236.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-09-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0236.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.njlzEmBiaX (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-08_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001113_TTUQ1b1x1_1795633_KJi4D5cx/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001113_TTUQ1b1x1_1795633_KJi4D5cx/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001113_TTUQ1b1x1_1795633_KJi4D5cx/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001113_TTUQ1b1x1_1795633_KJi4D5cx/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001113_TTUQ1b1x1_1795633_KJi4D5cx/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001113_TTUQ1b1x1_1795633_KJi4D5cx/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001113_TTUQ1b1x1_1795633_KJi4D5cx/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001113_TTUQ1b1x1_1795633_KJi4D5cx/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=469, passed=6382
Got 6382 stars (including 5911 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6382 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 914 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 895 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6214 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 914 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6215 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6215 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 914 stars left (next iteration limit 1005)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001113_TTUQ1b1x1_1795633_KJi4D5cx/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-09-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0236.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-09-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0236.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001113_TTUQ1b1x1_1795633_KJi4D5cx/wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-09-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0236.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001113_TTUQ1b1x1_1795633_KJi4D5cx/wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Leo-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 10:31:56.02 +26:41:06.9: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits at 10:31:56.02 +26:41:06.9: 15.76 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20502.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 6s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20502_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237
Preparing report for the candidate 20502_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07076_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 07076_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 05 08.21557 | 2461168.71557 | 8.21 | 09:53:43.17 +34:55:33.4 | 5761 0266 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001113_TTUQ1b1x1_1795633_KJi4D5cx/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237.fits |
**** FOUND 09:53:43.18 +34:55:33.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 06231_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 06231_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 05 08.21557 | 2461168.71557 | 8.38 | 09:45:34.50 +34:30:38.4 | 6764 0553 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001113_TTUQ1b1x1_1795633_KJi4D5cx/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237.fits |
**** FOUND 09:45:34.49 +34:30:38.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 7s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Leo-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
10:31:56.02 +26:41:06.9
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001113_TTUQ1b1x1_1795633_KJi4D5cx/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-09-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0236.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001113_TTUQ1b1x1_1795633_KJi4D5cx/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001113_TTUQ1b1x1_1795633_KJi4D5cx/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-09-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0236.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001113_TTUQ1b1x1_1795633_KJi4D5cx/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-09-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0236.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-09-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0236.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:00:00.034 +30:00:18.88 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-09-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0236.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-09-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0236.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:00:07.286 +30:00:25.30 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:00:00.034 +30:00:18.88
Second-epoch image center 10:00:07.286 +30:00:25.30
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0262 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:00:06.317 +29:59:47.86 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:00:00.034 +30:00:18.88
Second-epoch image center 10:00:06.317 +29:59:47.86
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0243 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 10:00:07.286 +30:00:25.30
Second-epoch second image center 10:00:06.317 +29:59:47.86
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01097 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits &> /tmp/tmp.5Hz18idrne
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits &> /tmp/tmp.bt8LTiFxt9
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001113_TTUQ1b1x1_1795633_KJi4D5cx/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-09-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0236.fits &> /tmp/tmp.LtowIiImFo
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001113_TTUQ1b1x1_1795633_KJi4D5cx/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-09-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0236.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001113_TTUQ1b1x1_1795633_KJi4D5cx/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237.fits &> /tmp/tmp.UXn13zdXmU
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001113_TTUQ1b1x1_1795633_KJi4D5cx/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits and wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits and wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits and wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits) and catalog (wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 38207 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 140.2252 to 159.3111 deg, Dec +24.1997 to +35.3652 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 140.2252 to 159.3111 deg, Dec 24.1997 to 35.3652 deg
Loaded 5570 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3855 out of 4322 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4322 out of 38207 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.816900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.816900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.26
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.56
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.56
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 38207 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 140.2252 to 159.3111 deg, Dec +24.1997 to +35.3652 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 140.2252 to 159.3111 deg, Dec 24.1997 to 35.3652 deg
Loaded 5570 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3855 out of 4322 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4322 out of 38207 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits (aperture=5.1)
Read 38198 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 140.2251 to 159.2856 deg, Dec +24.1770 to +35.3601 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 140.2251 to 159.2856 deg, Dec 24.1770 to 35.3601 deg
Loaded 5577 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3842 out of 4322 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4322 out of 38198 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits (aperture=5.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 31 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
2.0 pix Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits
2.0 pix fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-09-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0236.fits
2.0 pix fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
2.0 pix wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
2.0 pix wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
15.6 mag. Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits
15.4 mag. fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-09-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0236.fits
15.4 mag. fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.4 (SNR ) 14.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.5Hz18idrne (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-08_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001113_TTUQ1b1x1_1795633_KJi4D5cx/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=23, blended=1809, passed=38184
Got 38184 stars (including 36309 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 38184 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 917 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 917 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 900 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 917 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37521 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 917 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 917 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37520 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 917 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37518 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 917 stars left (next iteration limit 1008)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits -region wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.bt8LTiFxt9 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-08_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001113_TTUQ1b1x1_1795633_KJi4D5cx/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=25, blended=1825, passed=38173
Got 38173 stars (including 36282 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 38173 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 916 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 901 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37462 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 916 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37463 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37462 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 916 stars left (next iteration limit 1007)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits -region wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.LtowIiImFo (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-08_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001113_TTUQ1b1x1_1795633_KJi4D5cx/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001113_TTUQ1b1x1_1795633_KJi4D5cx/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-09-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0236.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001113_TTUQ1b1x1_1795633_KJi4D5cx/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-09-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0236.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001113_TTUQ1b1x1_1795633_KJi4D5cx/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-09-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0236.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001113_TTUQ1b1x1_1795633_KJi4D5cx/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-09-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0236.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001113_TTUQ1b1x1_1795633_KJi4D5cx/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-09-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0236.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001113_TTUQ1b1x1_1795633_KJi4D5cx/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-09-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0236.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-09-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0236.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-09-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0236.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-09-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0236.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-09-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0236.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-09-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0236.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-09-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0236.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-09-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0236.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001113_TTUQ1b1x1_1795633_KJi4D5cx/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-09-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0236.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-09-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0236.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=18, blended=1466, passed=35099
Got 35099 stars (including 33564 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-09-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0236.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 35099 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 914 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 900 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34188 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 914 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34187 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34187 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 914 stars left (next iteration limit 1005)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-09-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0236.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-09-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0236.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001113_TTUQ1b1x1_1795633_KJi4D5cx/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-09-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0236.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-09-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0236.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-09-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0236.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.UXn13zdXmU (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-08_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001113_TTUQ1b1x1_1795633_KJi4D5cx/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001113_TTUQ1b1x1_1795633_KJi4D5cx/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001113_TTUQ1b1x1_1795633_KJi4D5cx/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001113_TTUQ1b1x1_1795633_KJi4D5cx/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001113_TTUQ1b1x1_1795633_KJi4D5cx/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001113_TTUQ1b1x1_1795633_KJi4D5cx/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001113_TTUQ1b1x1_1795633_KJi4D5cx/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001113_TTUQ1b1x1_1795633_KJi4D5cx/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=24, blended=1429, passed=35421
Got 35421 stars (including 33923 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 35421 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 915 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 901 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34611 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 915 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34609 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34609 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 915 stars left (next iteration limit 1006)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001113_TTUQ1b1x1_1795633_KJi4D5cx/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-09-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0236.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001113_TTUQ1b1x1_1795633_KJi4D5cx/wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-09-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0236.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001113_TTUQ1b1x1_1795633_KJi4D5cx/wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Leo-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 09:27:31.76 +34:42:12.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 10:06:51.86 +28:55:05.8: 13.91 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 09:36:19.31 +27:41:43.3: 14.56 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 10:19:44.16 +27:46:08.4: 14.78 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 10:09:14.92 +33:12:18.8: 14.08 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits at 09:27:31.76 +34:42:12.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:27:31.76 +34:42:12.8: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits at 10:06:51.86 +28:55:05.8: 13.95 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits at 10:19:44.16 +27:46:08.4: 14.73 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits at 09:36:19.31 +27:41:43.3: 14.99 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.93 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:06:51.86 +28:55:05.8: ref_mag=13.93 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9811 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.76 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.70 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:19:44.16 +27:46:08.4: ref_mag=14.76 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.8530 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:36:19.31 +27:41:43.3: ref_mag=14.70 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.8081 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 10:19:42.69 +33:39:04.7: 14.41 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 10:04:21.40 +34:29:04.4: 14.36 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 09:36:08.49 +32:42:21.0: 14.41 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits at 10:09:14.92 +33:12:18.8: 14.13 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.10 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:09:14.92 +33:12:18.8: ref_mag=14.10 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0832 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 09:53:06.38 +34:52:05.1: 14.65 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits at 10:19:42.69 +33:39:04.7: 14.49 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.45 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:19:42.69 +33:39:04.7: ref_mag=14.45 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.8721 delta=-0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits at 10:04:21.40 +34:29:04.4: 14.37 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits at 09:36:08.49 +32:42:21.0: 14.37 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.37 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.39 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:04:21.40 +34:29:04.4: ref_mag=14.37 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.4639 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:36:08.49 +32:42:21.0: ref_mag=14.39 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.8227 delta=-0.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 09:42:19.50 +30:22:22.2: 14.96 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 10:25:48.84 +28:38:57.2: 15.16 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 10:23:36.55 +28:41:03.0: 15.33 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 09:36:41.43 +27:28:51.3: 15.20 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits at 09:53:06.38 +34:52:05.1: 14.39 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.49 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:53:06.38 +34:52:05.1: ref_mag=14.49 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.6670 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits at 09:42:19.50 +30:22:22.2: 15.31 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits at 10:25:48.84 +28:38:57.2: 15.36 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits at 09:36:41.43 +27:28:51.3: 15.49 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits at 10:23:36.55 +28:41:03.0: 15.44 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.08 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.24 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:25:48.84 +28:38:57.2: ref_mag=15.24 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.9875 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:42:19.50 +30:22:22.2: ref_mag=15.08 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.9220 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.31 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.38 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:36:41.43 +27:28:51.3: ref_mag=15.31 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.9633 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:23:36.55 +28:41:03.0: ref_mag=15.38 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.9742 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 2s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52583_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 52583_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 05 08.21487 | 2461168.71487 | 14.88 | 10:19:44.19 +27:46:07.9 | 2095 4329 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001113_TTUQ1b1x1_1795633_KJi4D5cx/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-09-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0236.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 08.21557 | 2461168.71557 | 14.83 | 10:19:44.13 +27:46:08.9 | 2094 4322 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001113_TTUQ1b1x1_1795633_KJi4D5cx/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52584_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 52584_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 05 08.21487 | 2461168.71487 | 14.76 | 09:36:19.39 +27:41:45.0 | 7886 4704 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001113_TTUQ1b1x1_1795633_KJi4D5cx/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-09-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0236.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 08.21557 | 2461168.71557 | 14.88 | 09:36:19.23 +27:41:41.7 | 7884 4698 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001113_TTUQ1b1x1_1795633_KJi4D5cx/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52587_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 52587_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 08.21557 | 2461168.71557 | 14.42 | 10:26:56.13 +33:27:18.0 | 1542 0795 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001113_TTUQ1b1x1_1795633_KJi4D5cx/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237.fits |
**** FOUND 10:26:56.10 +33:27:17.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52624_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 52624_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 05 08.21487 | 2461168.71487 | 9.71 | 09:27:31.75 +34:42:12.9 | 9037 0443 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001113_TTUQ1b1x1_1795633_KJi4D5cx/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-09-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0236.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 08.21557 | 2461168.71557 | 9.72 | 09:27:31.76 +34:42:12.7 | 9035 0437 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001113_TTUQ1b1x1_1795633_KJi4D5cx/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52755_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 52755_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 08.21557 | 2461168.71557 | 11.75 | 10:31:56.01 +26:41:06.8 | 0369 4793 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001113_TTUQ1b1x1_1795633_KJi4D5cx/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237.fits |
**** FOUND 10:31:56.01 +26:41:06.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53137_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 53137_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 08.21557 | 2461168.71557 | 13.35 | 09:35:13.71 +32:13:52.3 | 8050 1953 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001113_TTUQ1b1x1_1795633_KJi4D5cx/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237.fits |
**** FOUND 09:35:13.73 +32:13:52.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53342_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 53342_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 08.21557 | 2461168.71557 | 13.74 | 09:52:41.68 +35:07:45.5 | 5894 0148 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001113_TTUQ1b1x1_1795633_KJi4D5cx/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237.fits |
**** FOUND 09:52:41.66 +35:07:45.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53357_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 53357_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 08.21557 | 2461168.71557 | 13.69 | 10:15:28.02 +28:05:54.7 | 2682 4179 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001113_TTUQ1b1x1_1795633_KJi4D5cx/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237.fits |
**** FOUND 10:15:28.03 +28:05:54.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53407_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 53407_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 08.21557 | 2461168.71557 | 13.86 | 09:44:01.82 +25:18:52.8 | 6812 6119 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001113_TTUQ1b1x1_1795633_KJi4D5cx/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237.fits |
**** FOUND 09:44:01.81 +25:18:52.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53463_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 53463_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 05 08.21487 | 2461168.71487 | 14.01 | 10:06:51.83 +28:55:05.5 | 3863 3788 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001113_TTUQ1b1x1_1795633_KJi4D5cx/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-09-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0236.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 08.21557 | 2461168.71557 | 13.95 | 10:06:51.89 +28:55:06.1 | 3861 3782 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001113_TTUQ1b1x1_1795633_KJi4D5cx/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53471_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 53471_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 05 08.21487 | 2461168.71487 | 14.07 | 10:09:14.85 +33:12:18.7 | 3759 1188 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001113_TTUQ1b1x1_1795633_KJi4D5cx/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-09-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0236.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 08.21557 | 2461168.71557 | 14.10 | 10:09:14.99 +33:12:19.0 | 3757 1182 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001113_TTUQ1b1x1_1795633_KJi4D5cx/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53513_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 53513_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 08.21557 | 2461168.71557 | 13.86 | 09:47:38.56 +33:15:13.1 | 6480 1308 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001113_TTUQ1b1x1_1795633_KJi4D5cx/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237.fits |
**** FOUND 09:47:38.56 +33:15:13.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53583_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 53583_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 08.21557 | 2461168.71557 | 14.26 | 10:05:00.44 +29:44:35.1 | 4141 3305 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001113_TTUQ1b1x1_1795633_KJi4D5cx/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237.fits |
**** FOUND 10:05:00.40 +29:44:35.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53635_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 53635_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 08.21557 | 2461168.71557 | 14.19 | 09:42:09.31 +33:46:39.1 | 7182 1007 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001113_TTUQ1b1x1_1795633_KJi4D5cx/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237.fits |
**** FOUND 09:42:09.33 +33:46:38.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53704_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 53704_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 08.21557 | 2461168.71557 | 14.18 | 09:53:44.30 +25:39:57.3 | 5494 5851 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001113_TTUQ1b1x1_1795633_KJi4D5cx/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237.fits |
**** FOUND 09:53:44.26 +25:39:57.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53709_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 53709_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 08.21557 | 2461168.71557 | 14.35 | 10:22:22.93 +30:48:32.1 | 1943 2458 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001113_TTUQ1b1x1_1795633_KJi4D5cx/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237.fits |
**** FOUND 10:22:22.94 +30:48:31.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53716_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 53716_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 08.21557 | 2461168.71557 | 14.66 | 10:00:16.95 +32:31:42.4 | 4860 1672 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001113_TTUQ1b1x1_1795633_KJi4D5cx/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237.fits |
**** FOUND 10:00:16.99 +32:31:43.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53718_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 53718_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 05 08.21487 | 2461168.71487 | 14.42 | 10:04:21.42 +34:29:04.3 | 4429 0463 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001113_TTUQ1b1x1_1795633_KJi4D5cx/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-09-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0236.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 08.21557 | 2461168.71557 | 14.51 | 10:04:21.38 +34:29:04.5 | 4427 0457 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001113_TTUQ1b1x1_1795633_KJi4D5cx/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53865_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 53865_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 08.21557 | 2461168.71557 | 14.27 | 09:48:20.46 +34:06:33.2 | 6410 0787 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001113_TTUQ1b1x1_1795633_KJi4D5cx/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237.fits |
**** FOUND 09:48:20.47 +34:06:32.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54023_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 54023_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 05 08.21487 | 2461168.71487 | 14.87 | 10:19:42.70 +33:39:04.5 | 2468 0792 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001113_TTUQ1b1x1_1795633_KJi4D5cx/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-09-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0236.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 08.21557 | 2461168.71557 | 14.88 | 10:19:42.68 +33:39:05.0 | 2466 0785 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001113_TTUQ1b1x1_1795633_KJi4D5cx/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54071_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 54071_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 05 08.21487 | 2461168.71487 | 14.83 | 09:36:08.44 +32:42:20.3 | 7937 1671 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001113_TTUQ1b1x1_1795633_KJi4D5cx/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-09-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0236.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 08.21557 | 2461168.71557 | 14.81 | 09:36:08.55 +32:42:21.7 | 7935 1664 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001113_TTUQ1b1x1_1795633_KJi4D5cx/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54087_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 54087_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 05 08.21487 | 2461168.71487 | 14.83 | 09:53:06.35 +34:52:05.1 | 5838 0311 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001113_TTUQ1b1x1_1795633_KJi4D5cx/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-09-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0236.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 08.21557 | 2461168.71557 | 14.57 | 09:53:06.42 +34:52:05.0 | 5836 0305 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001113_TTUQ1b1x1_1795633_KJi4D5cx/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54102_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 54102_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 08.21557 | 2461168.71557 | 14.99 | 10:31:01.65 +27:21:45.4 | 0546 4398 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001113_TTUQ1b1x1_1795633_KJi4D5cx/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237.fits |
**** FOUND 10:31:01.61 +27:21:46.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54115_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 54115_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 05 08.21487 | 2461168.71487 | 14.91 | 09:42:19.43 +30:22:21.9 | 7114 3071 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001113_TTUQ1b1x1_1795633_KJi4D5cx/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-09-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0236.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 08.21557 | 2461168.71557 | 14.95 | 09:42:19.56 +30:22:22.4 | 7112 3065 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001113_TTUQ1b1x1_1795633_KJi4D5cx/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54161_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 54161_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 05 08.21487 | 2461168.71487 | 14.89 | 09:36:41.41 +27:28:51.8 | 7835 4833 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001113_TTUQ1b1x1_1795633_KJi4D5cx/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-09-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0236.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 08.21557 | 2461168.71557 | 15.08 | 09:36:41.44 +27:28:50.8 | 7833 4827 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001113_TTUQ1b1x1_1795633_KJi4D5cx/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54196_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 54196_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 05 08.21487 | 2461168.71487 | 14.99 | 10:23:36.53 +28:41:03.5 | 1640 3724 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001113_TTUQ1b1x1_1795633_KJi4D5cx/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-09-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0236.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 08.21557 | 2461168.71557 | 14.96 | 10:23:36.56 +28:41:02.4 | 1638 3717 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001113_TTUQ1b1x1_1795633_KJi4D5cx/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54200_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 54200_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 05 08.21487 | 2461168.71487 | 14.99 | 10:25:48.83 +28:38:57.4 | 1345 3712 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001113_TTUQ1b1x1_1795633_KJi4D5cx/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-09-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0236.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 08.21557 | 2461168.71557 | 14.99 | 10:25:48.86 +28:38:57.0 | 1343 3706 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001113_TTUQ1b1x1_1795633_KJi4D5cx/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54207_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 54207_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 08.21557 | 2461168.71557 | 14.85 | 10:01:06.40 +31:38:55.3 | 4722 2195 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001113_TTUQ1b1x1_1795633_KJi4D5cx/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237.fits |
**** FOUND 10:01:06.41 +31:38:55.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23757_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 23757_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 05 08.21557 | 2461168.71557 | 8.33 | 09:53:43.19 +34:55:33.6 | 5761 0266 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001113_TTUQ1b1x1_1795633_KJi4D5cx/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237.fits |
**** FOUND 09:53:43.19 +34:55:33.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 24770_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 24770_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 05 08.21557 | 2461168.71557 | 8.62 | 09:45:34.52 +34:30:38.6 | 6764 0553 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001113_TTUQ1b1x1_1795633_KJi4D5cx/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237.fits |
**** FOUND 09:45:34.50 +34:30:38.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25373_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 25373_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 05 08.21557 | 2461168.71557 | 13.86 | 09:39:25.69 +34:14:52.1 | 7531 0725 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001113_TTUQ1b1x1_1795633_KJi4D5cx/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-10-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0237.fits |
**** FOUND 09:39:25.71 +34:14:52.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Leo-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
10:31:56.02 +26:41:06.9
########### Completed Leo-01-Q1b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
10:31:56.02 +26:41:06.9
###################################################################################
10:31:56.02 +26:41:06.9 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list)
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Nothing to add to the exclusion list ####
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461168.71487137 -observatory V36
02:30:51.19 +13:51:32.0 Mercury (-1.5mag)
05:01:23.07 +23:57:38.9 Venus (-3.9mag)
01:20:47.62 +07:36:44.2 Mars (1.2mag)
07:25:05.58 +22:23:42.6 Jupiter (-2.0mag)
00:38:37.44 +01:46:44.2 Saturn (0.9mag)
03:52:43.27 +20:03:13.4 Uranus (5.8mag)
00:13:30.92 +00:01:15.6 Neptune (7.8mag)
20:34:14.55 -22:55:23.7 Pluto (14.5mag)
20:08:18.03 -23:49:35.5 Moon (-10.9mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 363 May 8 00:14 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461168.71487137:
07:25:05.96 +22:23:39.4 Io (5.9mag)
07:25:17.70 +22:23:12.6 Europa (6.0mag)
07:25:15.20 +22:23:13.9 Ganymede (5.5mag)
07:24:53.91 +22:24:02.2 Callisto (6.7mag)
07:27:15.91 +22:03:08.3 Himalia (15.5mag)
07:25:09.61 +22:23:31.4 Thebe (16.4mag)
07:27:44.12 +22:30:57.8 Elara (17.4mag)
07:25:27.24 +22:52:03.3 Pasiphae (17.6mag)
07:32:49.96 +22:23:26.7 Carme (18.7mag)
00:38:31.69 +01:46:39.4 Titan (8.7mag)
00:38:33.87 +01:46:52.5 Rhea (10.0mag)
00:38:19.01 +01:44:39.5 Iapetus (11.4mag)
00:38:42.92 +01:47:09.5 Hyperion (14.7mag)
00:39:54.34 +01:52:54.8 Phoebe (16.8mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 569 May 8 00:14 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461168.71487137:
16:51:30.99 -28:04:49.7 JWST
17:28:54.97 +41:24:14.9 Chandra
08:15:31.17 -43:45:54.5 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 May 8 00:14 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461168.71487137 -observatory V36
-> Warning: Longitude 255.61742 is outside valid range [-180, 180]
07:18:45.16 +27:24:27.6 17.7mag P/2009 WX51 (Catalina)
18:55:49.18 -30:15:50.1 13.7mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
05:24:30.01 -68:45:27.6 17.4mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
05:38:22.16 +31:37:08.7 17.3mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
17:25:59.24 +12:59:29.7 17.7mag C/2021 G2 (ATLAS)
23:14:19.28 +30:12:37.9 17.1mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS)
04:55:52.33 +26:34:03.9 16.2mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
09:11:06.12 +31:53:31.8 16.4mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS)
08:36:41.97 +01:55:51.9 17.5mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS)
18:45:54.12 +20:13:30.8 17.6mag C/2023 A3 (Tsuchinshan-ATLAS)
15:32:07.34 -11:12:27.1 17.5mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS)
09:00:50.67 -08:41:24.0 17.9mag C/2023 F3 (ATLAS)
22:11:05.82 +64:22:18.0 17.6mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon)
18:51:46.86 -04:24:35.1 13.9mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS)
17:23:16.13 +88:18:42.7 17.9mag C/2023 X2 (Lemmon)
06:33:54.77 +63:35:47.5 17.4mag C/2024 A1 (ATLAS)
05:56:25.03 +23:48:42.3 12.3mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
16:02:50.68 +09:51:47.9 17.3mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS)
20:23:33.31 +21:40:03.5 14.3mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
03:47:13.80 -19:17:06.6 16.2mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
05:36:42.04 +40:17:44.6 17.8mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov)
12:19:56.42 +52:51:53.3 16.2mag C/2025 L1 (ATLAS)
04:03:55.09 -30:10:00.7 18.0mag C/2025 Q3 (ATLAS)
05:15:08.02 -06:20:59.0 9.7mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS)
12:45:27.04 +04:08:03.8 17.3mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
05:16:54.59 +01:28:43.8 17.4mag C/2026 A1 (MAPS)
00:57:09.81 +40:31:47.2 15.3mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao)
19:25:46.76 -08:33:30.1 10.5mag 10P/Tempel
14:32:11.56 +00:17:11.3 16.0mag 24P/Schaumasse
10:59:10.49 -00:59:21.4 15.8mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
10:41:43.05 -02:50:22.8 17.4mag 43P/Wolf-Harrington
02:23:18.60 +21:07:42.6 17.4mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson
07:54:32.02 +31:56:50.9 16.9mag 63P/Wild
23:55:48.82 -08:58:40.0 15.7mag 65P/Gunn
05:06:12.77 +27:54:15.6 16.1mag 76P/West-Kohoutek-Ikemura
01:55:48.92 +12:24:41.3 14.1mag 78P/Gehrels
00:05:59.37 -02:56:00.3 14.9mag 88P/Howell
03:16:11.79 +25:54:26.8 15.1mag 93P/Lovas
05:39:50.73 +33:10:17.4 15.9mag 123P/West-Hartley
08:59:02.50 +28:13:56.6 16.3mag 124P/Mrkos
03:08:20.68 +16:41:31.0 16.4mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt
03:31:35.31 +16:53:54.6 17.6mag 131P/Mueller
03:26:06.09 +18:44:21.0 11.1mag 141P/Machholz
03:30:57.12 +12:27:21.0 11.1mag 141P-A/Machholz
02:10:57.33 +08:28:37.2 10.7mag 141P-D/Machholz
02:34:34.22 -29:49:48.3 17.9mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS
02:05:40.41 +09:39:32.0 14.9mag 162P/SidingSpring
17:13:50.59 -11:13:14.7 16.1mag 235P/LINEAR
06:23:57.95 +35:47:40.1 17.1mag 240P/NEAT
07:52:04.38 -03:08:11.0 17.9mag 242P/Spahr
23:12:43.93 -14:17:24.2 17.2mag 260P/McNaught
02:46:25.37 +25:53:49.1 17.8mag 295P/LINEAR
15:31:47.29 +08:06:53.1 17.4mag 391P/Kowalski
07:45:15.88 +21:17:37.5 17.8mag 450P/LONEOS
06:09:51.31 +43:43:18.2 17.7mag 493P/LONEOS
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.8K May 8 00:14 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30 ASASSN-26de 2026-05-6.29 14.51
16:21:49.13 -61:36:14.60 ASASSN-26dd 2026-05-5.15 15.93
14:26:40.22 -24:48:37.50 AT2026lig 2026-05-4.27 14.63
13:17:51.04 +30:25:13.50 SN2026kcp 2026-05-4.46 16.43
11:27:55.57 -13:38:56.90 SN2026kza 2026-05-1.08 15.59
22:28:27.10 +30:17:54.30 SN 2026fov 2026-04-29.6 14.36
21:00:10.71 -32:17:03.90 AT2026kis 2026-04-27.36 16.15
14:32:57.37 -58:13:26.40 ASASSN-26dc 2026-04-27.27 13.42
15:32:05.35 -43:54:34.60 ASASSN-26db 2026-04-27.37 16.06
16:34:34.97 -54:34:58.00 ASASSN-26da 2026-04-25.32 16.11
10:06:55.04 -01:13:49.70 SN2026jsg 2026-04-24.99 16.28
15:15:57.17 +56:18:32.80 SN2026kid 2026-04-24.52 -3.65
07:58:28.45 +57:03:42.40 AT2026kcf 2026-04-24.2 16.89
11:38:21.80 -50:43:06.50 SN2026jkb 2026-04-24.24 15.38
10:06:11.41 -39:41:04.20 AT2026dil 2026-04-24.2 16.85
14:21:40.08 +13:13:46.30 SN2026jlm 2026-04-22.16 15.12
10:53:55.47 -16:06:07.00 ASASSN-26cz 2026-04-22.24 16.32
21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30 2026-05-6.29 14.51
13:45:02.03 +15:17:14.50 ASASSN-26cy 2026-04-21.27 15.78
13:20:52.22 -35:57:03.60 AT2026jcm 2026-04-19.01 16.65
13:36:15.66 -36:53:48.40 SN 2026iqy 2026-04-18.92 17.31
06:34:01.33 -40:07:34.00 ASASSN-26cx 2026-04-19.07 16.16
23:33:57.97 -45:12:11.90 SN 2026idu 2026-04-19.41 15.9
12:10:50.92 +66:55:31.20 SN 2026icv 2026-04-17.14 16.03
21:36:59.06 -60:43:35.90 ASASSN-26cv 2026-04-17.35 -1.18
08:13:26.26 -27:07:30.50 ASASSN-26cw 2026-04-17.07 -1.01
14:49:14.01 -27:29:20.10 ASASSN-26cu 2026-04-16.29 -2.7
17:21:59.44 -38:54:04.60 ASASSN-26ct 2026-04-14.4 15.15
15:25:54.99 +07:49:24.50 SN2026huo 2026-04-12.14 16.96
21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30 2026-05-6.29 14.51
12:23:20.40 +04:53:39.10 AT2026ixd 2026-04-12.14 17.65
17:46:09.76 -61:19:50.40 SN2026icy 2026-04-12.2 17.03
09:25:46.42 +02:13:46.30 SN2026gud 2026-04-11.98 16.49
16:52:15.46 -60:27:45.90 ASASSN-26cs 2026-04-12.4 15.5
04:20:55.37 -51:15:31.10 ASASSN-26cr 2026-04-12.01 15.37
22:25:39.35 +36:45:06.90 AT2026ihl 2026-04-10.48 14.21
19:40:44.94 +00:41:03.80 AT2026imw 2026-04-10.32 16.06
19:52:04.70 +05:53:33.50 ASASSN-26cq 2026-04-9.31 14.98
16:08:18.39 -64:11:08.80 ASASSN-26cp 2026-04-9.29 13.32
09:22:22.90 -61:02:43.70 SN2026idh 2026-04-7.97 16.34
05:06:54.12 -19:42:26.40 AT2026imr 2026-04-8 17.49
07:14:55.34 -36:03:21.40 AT2026hei 2026-04-8.12 16.7
21:35:33.14 -19:01:34.80 AT2026ihm 2026-04-8.36 16.7
04:28:24.08 -32:25:35.30 AT2026imo 2026-04-8.02 16.81
05:10:35.79 -39:38:40.80 SN 2026hnn 2026-04-7.04 17.07
09:54:32.04 -01:17:25.80 ASASSN-26cn 2026-04-7.01 15.58
07:46:24.43 -77:29:36.30 ASASSN-26co 2026-04-7.15 15.11
05:00:45.52 -29:51:06.20 AT2026hvw 2026-04-6.03 16.51
19:49:33.10 -23:37:11.00 ASASSN-26cl 2026-04-5.29 14.98
19:32:43.55 -22:39:33.40 ASASSN-26cm 2026-04-4.3 13.88
18:08:57.38 +76:48:23.60 ASASSN-26ck 2026-04-2.37 15.38
16:16:36.10 +44:52:30.20 AT2026hyy 2026-04-2.58 13.81
21:55:23.31 -34:48:53.90 ASASSN-26cj 2026-03-30.4 -1.47
11:19:50.81 -27:51:50.40 SN2026gvk 2026-03-30 15.28
11:53:57.02 -23:09:46.20 SN2026gzx 2026-03-28.75 15.27
07:13:46.14 -33:10:15.70 ASASSN-26ci 2026-03-28.15 15.14
09:03:36.09 -67:58:13.00 SN2026hkg 2026-03-28.19 15.82
07:03:00.72 +39:14:43.00 SN2026fin 2026-03-28.27 15.82
05:35:42.80 -63:44:05.50 ASASSN-26ch 2026-03-27.86 13.02
11:23:19.04 +34:22:38.00 SN2026fwt 2026-03-27.3 16.56
19:03:49.79 +37:04:05.20 ASASSN-26ce 2026-03-26.56 16.3
20:26:56.07 -52:54:06.50 AT2026hiy 2026-03-26.35 16.95
05:25:54.76 -30:15:35.80 ASASSN-26cg 2026-03-25.07 16.88
06:57:16.49 -26:54:37.20 SN2026fzb 2026-03-25.14 15.8
14:37:38.23 -43:00:52.30 ASASSN-26cd 2026-03-24.24 12.52
17:34:53.03 +06:04:29.70 AT2026gzl 2026-03-23.27 15.82
08:30:02.60 -35:12:47.50 ASASSN-26cf 2026-03-23.2 14.82
16:54:25.33 +37:49:56.60 SN 2026evz 2026-03-21.32 17.54
17:06:19.20 -18:54:19.50 ASASSN-26bx 2026-03-21.25 16.39
19:01:16.28 -29:29:23.10 ASASSN-26bw 2026-03-21.33 15.81
08:46:05.75 +10:47:39.80 ASASSN-26ca 2026-03-21.13 14.27
12:14:58.16 +63:47:16.20 SN 2026fvx 2026-03-21.12 15.6
18:02:55.90 -75:23:02.60 ASASSN-26bz 2026-03-21.32 16.16
12:16:02.88 -53:16:33.80 ASASSN-26cc 2026-03-20.04 15.48
13:08:21.85 +29:13:44.20 SN 2026fmh 2026-03-20.16 -0.33
19:56:38.48 -34:45:21.50 ASASSN-26cb 2026-03-20.35 -3.26
14:32:41.15 -41:38:48.50 ASASSN-26by 2026-03-20.15 -1.31
13:00:42.99 +37:18:34.60 SN2026fjc 2026-03-19.5 15.97
06:02:44.21 -04:11:06.20 ASASSN-26bv 2026-03-19.19 15.67
12:20:27.96 -45:55:38.40 ASASSN-26bt 2026-03-18.8 16.32
07:49:57.30 -56:14:35.10 ASASSN-26bu 2026-03-19.19 15.74
06:04:29.75 +53:23:34.00 SN 2026eza 2026-03-18.2 17.48
11:54:57.87 +69:19:28.90 AT2026fsf 2026-03-18.14 16.95
10:44:46.95 +58:27:29.30 SN 2026enn 2026-03-18.13 17.53
20:45:54.04 -73:26:43.00 AT 2026ezy 2026-03-18.13 16.83
06:53:18.10 -59:10:49.30 ASASSN-26bs 2026-03-18.02 16.93
07:45:09.29 -62:14:36.20 ASASSN-26br 2026-03-16.16 16.78
19:24:27.93 -52:04:36.40 AT 2023uk 2026-03-16.35 14.2
04:52:54.50 -15:20:57.10 AT2026fhw 2026-03-14.06 SDSS
11:10:34.24 +02:58:48.10 SN2026drr 2026-03-14.08 0.2
07:26:45.73 -27:45:13.90 ASASSN-26bo 2026-03-14.17 13.8
16:35:46.94 +58:12:28.40 SN2026ebt 2026-03-12.41 17.12
13:01:19.46 +15:42:15.50 SN2026ehe 2026-03-12.34 -0.18
09:15:55.41 +10:08:09.70 SN2026efq 2026-03-12.16 0.06
03:31:20.92 -35:29:29.00 SN2026evh 2026-03-12.05 17.29
06:26:19.15 -85:18:28.10 AT2026ffp 2026-03-12.16 0.37
14:16:42.30 -41:18:36.50 AT2026fij 2026-03-12.05 15.97
10:45:04.71 +00:06:13.10 SN 2026exe 2026-03-11.78 16.48
18:07:45.58 +69:43:01.00 SN2026ess 2026-03-12.37 17.37
13:11:03.58 +49:06:31.80 AT2026ewa 2026-03-12.42 16.77
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.8K May 8 00:14 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
05:19:15.40 -02:04:51.5 TCP J05191540-0204515 2026-02-13.4306 14.5mag
10:52:41.26 +36:40:08.9 TCP J10524126+3640089 2026-02-17.6065 17.4mag
05:50:50.81 +36:22:45.1 TCP J05505081+3622451 2026-02-17.5511 15.7mag
00:42:51.33 +41:13:49.1 PNV J00425133+4113491 2026-02-20.738 18.3mag
00:43:04.88 +41:29:41.4 PNV J00430488+4129414 2026-02-20.5923 18.84Cmag
17:43:29.74 +11:24:00.3 TCP J17432974+1124003 2026-02-22.3773 13.6mag
09:55:01.59 +69:08:42.7 PNV J09550159+6908427 2026-02-20.893 19.0mag
07:03:25.76 -12:41:40.1 TCP J07032576-1241401 2026-03-10.4268 15.4mag
00:42:36.82 +41:16:05.8 PNV J00423682+4116058 2026-03-12.5744 17.24Cmag
07:26:45.79 -27:45:14.1 TCP J07264579-2745141 2026-03-17.4417 14.8mag
17:57:19.56 -28:08:14.7 TCP J17571956-2808147 2026-03-19.7972 14.5mag
08:46:05.73 +10:47:39.7 TCP J08460573+1047397 2026-03-21.1936 14.5mag
09:55:38.83 +69:05:21.7 PNV J09553883+6905217 2026-04-01.893 19.4mag
19:32:43.67 -22:39:30.7 TCP J19324367-2239307 2026-04-05.4395 13.6mag
16:16:36.03 +44:52:28.9 TCP J16163603+4452289 2026-04-05.6655 14.2mag
00:43:38.36 +41:15:32.4 PNV J00433836+4115324 2026-04-08.079 17.2mag
15:41:11.68 +59:18:26.8 TCP J15411168+5918268 2026-04-12.9625 19.2mag
00:43:35.02 +41:46:28.0 PNV J00433502+4146280 2026-04-23.056 15.9mag
00:42:55.64 +41:14:12.2 PNV J00425564+4114122 2026-04-24.042 16.2mag
21:14:03.38 +56:46:44.1 TCP J21140338+5646441 2026-05-05.3534 16.7mag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 188K May 8 00:14 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
21:54:46.058 +01:05:30.99 AT 2026kws 2026-04-26.81 19.28
23:07:19.032 -15:00:00.40 AT 2026kwr 2026-04-26.81 19.21
19:07:15.267 -51:55:16.17 AT 2026kwq 2026-04-15.78 20.16
22:16:46.251 -03:34:28.60 AT 2026kwp 2026-04-26.81 19.34
15:16:39.314 +41:01:52.21 AT 2026kwo 2026-04-27.02 19.18
09:58:33.905 +03:50:25.88 AT 2026kwn 2026-01-10.17 23.03
15:36:03.770 +49:35:13.82 AT 2026kwm 2026-04-26.45 18.9
03:32:40.741 -29:11:08.44 AT 2026kwl 2026-02-17.10 23.11
04:23:20.674 -46:34:04.72 AT 2026kwk 2026-02-19.06 22.51
14:11:28.214 -28:28:23.04 AT 2026kwj 2026-04-25.49 19.41
19:59:17.390 +24:32:55.50 AT 2026kwi 2026-04-26.39 16.5
13:19:23.550 +50:22:38.25 AT 2026kwh 2026-04-12.88 21.52
13:20:45.080 +47:43:44.72 AT 2026kwg 2026-04-11.87 21.27
13:02:07.110 +01:21:38.24 AT 2026kwf 2026-04-20.72 22.46
11:09:19.050 +00:33:33.02 AT 2026kwe 2026-04-16.59 22.46
11:11:21.990 +05:07:38.27 AT 2026kwd 2026-04-16.59 22.58
11:00:59.360 +04:26:52.51 AT 2026kwc 2026-04-13.59 22.13
14:08:37.750 +03:51:47.04 AT 2026kwb 2026-04-06.66 21.97
13:36:23.900 +05:28:37.79 AT 2026kwa 2026-03-23.83 22.52
13:45:58.010 +03:12:52.08 AT 2026kvz 2026-03-19.83 21.94
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 30K May 8 00:14 tns_transients_list.txt