This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_000556_TTUQ2b1x1_1431959_8L7drlbG
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 08.2117 2461168.7117 11.67 16:57:24.18 -08:59:26.4
10.74084 20.38383 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 5.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.28 Bellona 1 -0 1 11.7 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 16:57:24.18 -08:59:26.4: 15.31 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 16:57:24.18 -08:59:26.4: 15.30 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461168.7117,11.67,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260508.2117 11.67CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 08.2117 2461168.7117 12.46 17:20:50.87 -08:59:55.9
14.00150 15.49527 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 5.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.258 Tyche 1 -0 1 12.5 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 17:20:50.87 -08:59:55.9: 15.48 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 17:20:50.87 -08:59:55.9: 15.43 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461168.7117,12.46,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260508.2117 12.46CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 08.2117 2461168.7117 13.18 17:25:02.30 -10:30:21.1
13.23228 13.82696 galactic Ser Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 5.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.412 Elisabetha 1 -0 1 13.3 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 17:25:02.30 -10:30:21.1: 15.40 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 17:25:02.30 -10:30:21.1: 15.36 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 08.2117* 17 25 02.30 -10 30 21.1 13.2 U Ser 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461168.7117,13.18,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260508.2117 13.18CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 08.2117 2461168.7117 13.38 16:42:14.98 -05:48:26.6
11.36238 25.27413 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.5" and 5.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.97 Klotho 1 -1 1 12.9 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 16:42:14.98 -05:48:26.6: 15.25 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 16:42:14.98 -05:48:26.6: 15.29 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461168.7117,13.38,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260508.2117 13.38CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 08.2117 2461168.7117 13.86 17:14:28.00 -11:31:31.1
10.91507 15.48338 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 5.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.740 Cantabia 1 0 1 13.8 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 17:14:28.00 -11:31:31.1: 15.53 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 17:14:28.00 -11:31:31.1: 15.60 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461168.7117,13.86,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260508.2117 13.86CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461148.84898149 18.04.2026 08:22:22.001 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
First image: 2461148.84898149 18.04.2026 08:22:22.001 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
Last image: 2461168.71200155 08.05.2026 05:05:06.934 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_000556_TTUQ2b1x1_1431959_8L7drlbG/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 7
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.01
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 3883
Objects passed selection criteria: 3878
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 3556.25
Average stars matched: 3481.25 (97.891 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 110692 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed May 6 12:14:36 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-43-g0c21e0c3
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri May 8 00:07:30 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461148.84898149 18.04.2026 08:22:22.001 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
First image: 2461148.84898149 18.04.2026 08:22:22.001 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
Last image: 2461168.71200155 08.05.2026 05:05:06.934 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_000556_TTUQ2b1x1_1431959_8L7drlbG/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 70
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.56
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 15 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 39769
Objects passed selection criteria: 39712
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 37244.8
Average stars matched: 35930 (96.47 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 145792 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed May 6 12:14:36 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-43-g0c21e0c3
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri May 8 00:09:12 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_000556_TTUQ2b1x1_1431959_8L7drlbG/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-04-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_000556_TTUQ2b1x1_1431959_8L7drlbG/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_000556_TTUQ2b1x1_1431959_8L7drlbG/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-04-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_000556_TTUQ2b1x1_1431959_8L7drlbG/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461168.71146208
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
'tocp_transients_list.txt' -> '../tocp_transients_list.txt'
wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits'
wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits'
wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-04-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-04-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-04-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-04-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits'
wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
Image size: 937.6'x624.5' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:08:28.018 -09:57:35.75 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-04-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-04-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Image size: 938.8'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:08:34.462 -10:00:02.16 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:08:28.018 -09:57:35.75
Second-epoch image center 17:08:34.462 -10:00:02.16
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0485 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits
util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Image size: 938.8'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:08:32.392 -10:00:01.03 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:08:28.018 -09:57:35.75
Second-epoch image center 17:08:32.392 -10:00:01.03
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0442 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 17:08:34.462 -10:00:02.16
Second-epoch second image center 17:08:32.392 -10:00:01.03
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00850 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits &> /tmp/tmp.RbtQmFDW5x
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits &> /tmp/tmp.UfBYLMTLiE
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_000556_TTUQ2b1x1_1431959_8L7drlbG/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-04-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ANEQ4Z0OlK
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_000556_TTUQ2b1x1_1431959_8L7drlbG/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-04-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_000556_TTUQ2b1x1_1431959_8L7drlbG/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits &> /tmp/tmp.giTTbQBLfc
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_000556_TTUQ2b1x1_1431959_8L7drlbG/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits and wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits and wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits and wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits) and catalog (wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 5737 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 249.1339 to 265.2840 deg, Dec -15.2443 to -4.5570 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 249.1339 to 265.2840 deg, Dec -15.2443 to -4.5570 deg
Loaded 4155 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3239 out of 3334 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3334 out of 5737 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.672700
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.672700
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.01
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.66
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.66
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 5737 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 249.1339 to 265.2840 deg, Dec -15.2443 to -4.5570 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 249.1339 to 265.2840 deg, Dec -15.2443 to -4.5570 deg
Loaded 4155 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3239 out of 3334 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3334 out of 5737 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits (aperture=6.7)
Read 5776 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 249.1338 to 265.2840 deg, Dec -15.2443 to -4.5573 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 249.1338 to 265.2840 deg, Dec -15.2443 to -4.5573 deg
Loaded 4155 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3238 out of 3332 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3332 out of 5776 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits (aperture=6.7)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 3 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.5 pix Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
2.5 pix Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
2.5 pix fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-04-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
2.5 pix fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits
2.5 pix wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
2.5 pix wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.7 mag. Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
14.7 mag. Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-04-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
14.3 mag. fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.3 (SNR ) 11.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.RbtQmFDW5x (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-08_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_000556_TTUQ2b1x1_1431959_8L7drlbG/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=344, passed=5737
Got 5737 stars (including 5384 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5737 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.2 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 925 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5659 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.2 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5661 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5661 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.63"
Excluding outliers - 937 stars left (next iteration limit 1030)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits -region wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.UfBYLMTLiE (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-08_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_000556_TTUQ2b1x1_1431959_8L7drlbG/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=340, passed=5776
Got 5776 stars (including 5426 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5776 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.2 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 926 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5678 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.2 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5677 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5677 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Excluding outliers - 937 stars left (next iteration limit 1030)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits -region wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ANEQ4Z0OlK (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-08_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_000556_TTUQ2b1x1_1431959_8L7drlbG/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_000556_TTUQ2b1x1_1431959_8L7drlbG/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-04-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_000556_TTUQ2b1x1_1431959_8L7drlbG/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-04-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_000556_TTUQ2b1x1_1431959_8L7drlbG/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-04-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_000556_TTUQ2b1x1_1431959_8L7drlbG/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-04-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_000556_TTUQ2b1x1_1431959_8L7drlbG/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-04-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_000556_TTUQ2b1x1_1431959_8L7drlbG/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-04-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-04-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-04-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-04-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-04-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-04-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-04-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-04-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_000556_TTUQ2b1x1_1431959_8L7drlbG/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-04-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-04-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=252, passed=4180
Got 4180 stars (including 3927 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-04-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4180 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013039 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010431 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 922 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.63"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4112 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.63"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4113 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.63"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4113 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.65"
Excluding outliers - 935 stars left (next iteration limit 1028)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-04-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-04-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_000556_TTUQ2b1x1_1431959_8L7drlbG/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-04-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-04-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-04-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.giTTbQBLfc (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-08_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_000556_TTUQ2b1x1_1431959_8L7drlbG/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_000556_TTUQ2b1x1_1431959_8L7drlbG/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_000556_TTUQ2b1x1_1431959_8L7drlbG/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_000556_TTUQ2b1x1_1431959_8L7drlbG/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_000556_TTUQ2b1x1_1431959_8L7drlbG/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_000556_TTUQ2b1x1_1431959_8L7drlbG/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_000556_TTUQ2b1x1_1431959_8L7drlbG/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_000556_TTUQ2b1x1_1431959_8L7drlbG/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=254, passed=4206
Got 4206 stars (including 3950 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4206 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013039 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010431 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 923 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.62"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4152 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.63"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4154 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.63"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4154 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.64"
Excluding outliers - 936 stars left (next iteration limit 1029)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_000556_TTUQ2b1x1_1431959_8L7drlbG/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-04-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-04-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_000556_TTUQ2b1x1_1431959_8L7drlbG/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-04-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_000556_TTUQ2b1x1_1431959_8L7drlbG/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Oph-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 16:57:24.18 -08:59:26.4: 15.31 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 16:57:24.18 -08:59:26.4: 15.30 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20292.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 6s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20286_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0154
The candidate 20286_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0154 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:07:25.68 -10:50:55.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20292_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0154
Preparing report for the candidate 20292_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0154
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03187_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0154
The candidate 03187_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0154 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:06:10.79 -10:28:59.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 7s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Oph-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
16:57:24.18 -08:59:26.4
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_000556_TTUQ2b1x1_1431959_8L7drlbG/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-04-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_000556_TTUQ2b1x1_1431959_8L7drlbG/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_000556_TTUQ2b1x1_1431959_8L7drlbG/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-04-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_000556_TTUQ2b1x1_1431959_8L7drlbG/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-04-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-04-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
Image size: 937.6'x624.5' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:08:28.018 -09:57:35.75 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-04-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-04-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Image size: 938.8'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:08:34.462 -10:00:02.16 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:08:28.018 -09:57:35.75
Second-epoch image center 17:08:34.462 -10:00:02.16
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0485 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits
util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Image size: 938.8'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:08:32.392 -10:00:01.03 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:08:28.018 -09:57:35.75
Second-epoch image center 17:08:32.392 -10:00:01.03
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0442 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 17:08:34.462 -10:00:02.16
Second-epoch second image center 17:08:32.392 -10:00:01.03
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00850 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits &> /tmp/tmp.TMjrZsBZl6
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits &> /tmp/tmp.TItVYt2e2R
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_000556_TTUQ2b1x1_1431959_8L7drlbG/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-04-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits &> /tmp/tmp.CbUOLG8xn0
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_000556_TTUQ2b1x1_1431959_8L7drlbG/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-04-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_000556_TTUQ2b1x1_1431959_8L7drlbG/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits &> /tmp/tmp.zQhHKZFCny
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_000556_TTUQ2b1x1_1431959_8L7drlbG/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits and wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits and wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits and wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits) and catalog (wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 57760 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 249.1175 to 265.2927 deg, Dec -15.2552 to -4.5449 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 249.1175 to 265.2927 deg, Dec -15.2552 to -4.5449 deg
Loaded 4170 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3226 out of 3611 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3611 out of 57760 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.433700
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.433700
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.56
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.87
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.87
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 57760 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 249.1175 to 265.2927 deg, Dec -15.2552 to -4.5449 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 249.1175 to 265.2927 deg, Dec -15.2552 to -4.5449 deg
Loaded 4170 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3226 out of 3611 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3611 out of 57760 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 57367 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 249.1323 to 265.3001 deg, Dec -15.2554 to -4.5454 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 249.1323 to 265.3001 deg, Dec -15.2554 to -4.5454 deg
Loaded 4168 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3229 out of 3611 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3611 out of 57367 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 38 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
2.2 pix Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
2.1 pix fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-04-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
2.1 pix fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.9 mag. Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
14.9 mag. Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-04-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.6 (SNR ) 14.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.TMjrZsBZl6 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-08_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_000556_TTUQ2b1x1_1431959_8L7drlbG/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=2917, passed=57752
Got 57752 stars (including 54750 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 57752 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 927 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 56908 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 56904 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 56904 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Excluding outliers - 940 stars left (next iteration limit 1034)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits -region wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.TItVYt2e2R (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-08_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_000556_TTUQ2b1x1_1431959_8L7drlbG/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=2923, passed=57361
Got 57361 stars (including 54345 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 57361 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 928 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 56663 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 56662 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 56662 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Excluding outliers - 941 stars left (next iteration limit 1035)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits -region wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.CbUOLG8xn0 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-08_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_000556_TTUQ2b1x1_1431959_8L7drlbG/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_000556_TTUQ2b1x1_1431959_8L7drlbG/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-04-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_000556_TTUQ2b1x1_1431959_8L7drlbG/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-04-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_000556_TTUQ2b1x1_1431959_8L7drlbG/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-04-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_000556_TTUQ2b1x1_1431959_8L7drlbG/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-04-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_000556_TTUQ2b1x1_1431959_8L7drlbG/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-04-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_000556_TTUQ2b1x1_1431959_8L7drlbG/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-04-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-04-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-04-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-04-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-04-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-04-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-04-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-04-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_000556_TTUQ2b1x1_1431959_8L7drlbG/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-04-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-04-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=1765, passed=43496
Got 43496 stars (including 41666 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-04-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 43496 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013039 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010431 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 925 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.62"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42908 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42910 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42908 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.63"
Excluding outliers - 943 stars left (next iteration limit 1037)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-04-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-04-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_000556_TTUQ2b1x1_1431959_8L7drlbG/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-04-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-04-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-04-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.zQhHKZFCny (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-08_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_000556_TTUQ2b1x1_1431959_8L7drlbG/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_000556_TTUQ2b1x1_1431959_8L7drlbG/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_000556_TTUQ2b1x1_1431959_8L7drlbG/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_000556_TTUQ2b1x1_1431959_8L7drlbG/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_000556_TTUQ2b1x1_1431959_8L7drlbG/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_000556_TTUQ2b1x1_1431959_8L7drlbG/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_000556_TTUQ2b1x1_1431959_8L7drlbG/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_000556_TTUQ2b1x1_1431959_8L7drlbG/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=1758, passed=43227
Got 43227 stars (including 41400 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 43227 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013039 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010431 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 927 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.62"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42667 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42668 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42668 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Excluding outliers - 942 stars left (next iteration limit 1036)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_000556_TTUQ2b1x1_1431959_8L7drlbG/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-04-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_000556_TTUQ2b1x1_1431959_8L7drlbG/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-04-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_000556_TTUQ2b1x1_1431959_8L7drlbG/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Oph-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 17:06:49.26 -06:32:19.4: 14.48 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 17:11:59.58 -10:46:40.1: 13.73 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 17:26:06.52 -12:38:43.4: 13.89 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 17:18:16.83 -14:13:22.7: 14.02 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 16:41:31.58 -13:17:00.4: 12.78 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 17:20:50.87 -08:59:55.9: 15.48 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 16:45:30.67 -06:13:07.0: 13.57 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 17:25:02.30 -10:30:21.1: 15.40 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 16:42:14.98 -05:48:26.6: 15.25 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 17:26:06.52 -12:38:43.4: 13.99 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 17:06:49.26 -06:32:19.4: 14.25 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 17:20:50.87 -08:59:55.9: 15.43 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.94 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.34 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:06:49.26 -06:32:19.4: ref_mag=14.34 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.3503 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:26:06.52 -12:38:43.4: ref_mag=13.94 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.9561 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 17:11:59.58 -10:46:40.1: 13.93 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 17:18:16.83 -14:13:22.7: 13.91 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.81 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:11:59.58 -10:46:40.1: ref_mag=13.81 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.1360 delta=-0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 16:45:30.67 -06:13:07.0: 13.52 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 17:25:02.30 -10:30:21.1: 15.36 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 16:41:31.58 -13:17:00.4: 12.72 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.96 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:18:16.83 -14:13:22.7: ref_mag=13.96 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.9716 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.55 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.75 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:45:30.67 -06:13:07.0: ref_mag=13.55 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.5466 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:41:31.58 -13:17:00.4: ref_mag=12.75 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.9511 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 16:42:14.98 -05:48:26.6: 15.29 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 17:14:28.00 -11:31:31.1: 15.53 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 17:17:23.05 -14:00:05.6: 15.03 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 16:43:32.47 -09:22:40.0: 14.63 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 17:24:48.62 -11:49:29.8: 14.60 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 17:17:08.69 -07:06:10.2: 15.32 +/- 0.34 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 17:14:28.00 -11:31:31.1: 15.60 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 16:54:16.44 -12:33:24.5: 14.90 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 16:42:58.94 -06:58:49.9: 14.28 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 17:17:23.05 -14:00:05.6: 15.01 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.02 +/- 0.19
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 16:43:32.47 -09:22:40.0: 14.35 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 17:17:23.05 -14:00:05.6: ref_mag=15.02 +/- 0.19 new_mean_mag=14.0685 delta=0.95 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 17:24:48.62 -11:49:29.8: 14.46 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.46 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:43:32.47 -09:22:40.0: ref_mag=14.46 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.2210 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.52 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:24:48.62 -11:49:29.8: ref_mag=14.52 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.2266 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 17:17:08.69 -07:06:10.2: 14.94 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.05 +/- 0.19
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:17:08.69 -07:06:10.2: ref_mag=15.05 +/- 0.19 new_mean_mag=14.1893 delta=0.86 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 16:54:16.44 -12:33:24.5: 14.91 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.91 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:54:16.44 -12:33:24.5: ref_mag=14.91 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=14.2514 delta=0.66 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 16:42:58.94 -06:58:49.9: 14.27 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.27 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:42:58.94 -06:58:49.9: ref_mag=14.27 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.2132 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 17:07:21.94 -12:16:27.9: 15.05 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 17:05:42.21 -09:16:06.6: 14.88 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 17:20:09.53 -07:57:28.2: 14.46 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 17:25:06.89 -09:36:31.5: 14.82 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 16:53:03.25 -14:02:27.7: 14.46 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 17:07:21.94 -12:16:27.9: 15.06 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 17:05:42.21 -09:16:06.6: 14.47 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 17:20:09.53 -07:57:28.2: 14.27 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.06 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.60 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:07:21.94 -12:16:27.9: ref_mag=15.06 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=14.4223 delta=0.63 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:05:42.21 -09:16:06.6: ref_mag=14.60 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.4280 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.35 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:20:09.53 -07:57:28.2: ref_mag=14.35 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.2734 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 17:25:06.89 -09:36:31.5: 14.80 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.81 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:25:06.89 -09:36:31.5: ref_mag=14.81 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.2947 delta=0.52 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 16:53:03.25 -14:02:27.7: 14.54 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.49 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:53:03.25 -14:02:27.7: ref_mag=14.49 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.3852 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 17:12:56.38 -07:06:42.0: 14.47 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 17:06:23.41 -06:58:17.9: 14.65 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 17:07:20.06 -13:02:27.8: 14.95 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 17:11:10.97 -10:11:16.1: 14.81 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 17:06:23.41 -06:58:17.9: 14.58 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.61 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:06:23.41 -06:58:17.9: ref_mag=14.61 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.3858 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 17:12:56.38 -07:06:42.0: 14.49 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 17:07:20.06 -13:02:27.8: 14.58 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.48 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.71 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:12:56.38 -07:06:42.0: ref_mag=14.48 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.4037 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:07:20.06 -13:02:27.8: ref_mag=14.71 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.3274 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 17:11:10.97 -10:11:16.1: 14.87 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.84 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:11:10.97 -10:11:16.1: ref_mag=14.84 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.4802 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out72257.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out72046.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out72103.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out72129.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out72246.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 7s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71935_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0154
The candidate 71935_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0154 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71937_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0154
The candidate 71937_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0154 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71940_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0154
The candidate 71940_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0154 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71948_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0154
The candidate 71948_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0154 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71957_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0154
The candidate 71957_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0154 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71984_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0154
The candidate 71984_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0154 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71992_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0154
The candidate 71992_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0154 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:20:51.05 -12:50:08.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72020_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0154
The candidate 72020_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0154 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:57:24.19 -08:59:26.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72046_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0154
Preparing report for the candidate 72046_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0154
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72103_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0154
Preparing report for the candidate 72103_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0154
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72129_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0154
Preparing report for the candidate 72129_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0154
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72155_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0154
The candidate 72155_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0154 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:19:38.54 -14:09:49.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72160_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0154
The candidate 72160_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0154 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:24:16.92 -13:16:51.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72246_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0154
Preparing report for the candidate 72246_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0154
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72257_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0154
The candidate 72257_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0154 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:17:23.05 -14:00:05.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.12, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.10)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.035 4138101316400956544 259.34628943280 -14.00206710035 13.2006 11.2978 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.035#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72291_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0154
The candidate 72291_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0154 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:48:09.82 -14:14:05.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72293_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0154
The candidate 72293_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0154 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:06:42.62 -07:11:29.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72299_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0154
The candidate 72299_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0154 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72301_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0154
The candidate 72301_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0154 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72302_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0154
The candidate 72302_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0154 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72344_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0154
The candidate 72344_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0154 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72348_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0154
The candidate 72348_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0154 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72368_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0154
The candidate 72368_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0154 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72389_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0154
The candidate 72389_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0154 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72396_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0154
The candidate 72396_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0154 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72409_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0154
The candidate 72409_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0154 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72411_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0154
The candidate 72411_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0154 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72419_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0154
The candidate 72419_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0154 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72429_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0154
The candidate 72429_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0154 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72451_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0154
The candidate 72451_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0154 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72465_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0154
The candidate 72465_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0154 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68692_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0154
The candidate 68692_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0154 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:24:13.64 -11:50:44.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 15698_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0154
The candidate 15698_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0154 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:23:06.31 -12:51:41.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 29697_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0154
The candidate 29697_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0154 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:07:25.70 -10:50:55.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 48016_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0154
The candidate 48016_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0154 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:06:03.35 -07:07:03.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56133_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0154
The candidate 56133_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0154 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:14:04.78 -08:16:32.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31293_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0154
The candidate 31293_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0154 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:06:10.79 -10:28:59.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36254_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0154
The candidate 36254_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-05-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0154 did not pass the final checks