This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_000141_TTUQ2b1x1_1223607_t5Ns6Gt0
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 08.2089 2461168.7089 12.69 12:05:59.96 -01:56:31.0
280.50442 58.93699 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 4.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.204 Kallisto 1 0 1 12.8 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits at 12:05:59.96 -01:56:31.0: 15.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits at 12:05:59.96 -01:56:31.0: 16.01 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 08.2089* 12 05 59.96 -01 56 31.0 12.7 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461168.7089,12.69,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260508.2089 12.69CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 08.2089 2461168.7089 12.83 11:53:55.21 +01:13:37.6
272.49322 60.65378 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 4.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.122 Gerda 0 1 1 12.9 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits at 11:53:55.21 +01:13:37.6: 16.02 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits at 11:53:55.21 +01:13:37.6: 16.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 08.2089* 11 53 55.21 +01 13 37.6 12.8 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461168.7089,12.83,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260508.2089 12.83CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 08.2089 2461168.7089 13.12 12:22:50.62 +01:47:05.0
286.60095 63.74614 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 4.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.238 Hypatia 0 -0 0 13.1 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits at 12:22:50.62 +01:47:05.0: 15.81 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits at 12:22:50.62 +01:47:05.0: 15.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 08.2089* 12 22 50.62 +01 47 05.0 13.1 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461168.7089,13.12,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260508.2089 13.12CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 08.2089 2461168.7089 13.21 12:17:39.81 -03:10:44.4
286.58051 58.61639 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 4.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.184 Dejopeja 1 0 1 13.2 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits at 12:17:39.81 -03:10:44.4: 15.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits at 12:17:39.81 -03:10:44.4: 15.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 08.2089* 12 17 39.81 -03 10 44.4 13.2 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461168.7089,13.21,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260508.2089 13.21CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 08.2089 2461168.7089 14.09 11:56:00.51 -01:45:38.5
275.93262 58.17546 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 3.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.109 Felicitas -0 0 0 14.0 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits at 11:56:00.51 -01:45:38.5: 16.10 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits at 11:56:00.51 -01:45:38.5: 16.16 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 08.2089* 11 56 00.51 -01 45 38.5 14.1 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461168.7089,14.09,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260508.2089 14.09CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 08.2089 2461168.7089 14.68 12:00:40.71 -01:47:46.4
278.00924 58.59764 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.8" and 4.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.766 Moguntia 2 0 2 15.0 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits at 12:00:40.71 -01:47:46.4: 16.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits at 12:00:40.71 -01:47:46.4: 16.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 08.2089* 12 00 40.71 -01 47 46.4 14.7 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461168.7089,14.68,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260508.2089 14.68CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461093.86218641 22.02.2026 08:41:22.906 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits
First image: 2461093.86218641 22.02.2026 08:41:22.906 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits
Last image: 2461168.70921274 08.05.2026 05:01:05.981 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_000141_TTUQ2b1x1_1223607_t5Ns6Gt0/fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 3
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.74
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 2 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 4450
Objects passed selection criteria: 4450
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.8 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.8 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 4352.75
Average stars matched: 4194.5 (96.3644 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 110988 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed May 6 12:14:36 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-43-g0c21e0c3
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri May 8 00:07:45 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461093.86218641 22.02.2026 08:41:22.906 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits
First image: 2461093.86218641 22.02.2026 08:41:22.906 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits
Last image: 2461168.70921274 08.05.2026 05:01:05.981 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_000141_TTUQ2b1x1_1223607_t5Ns6Gt0/fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 130
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.40
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 11 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 26504
Objects passed selection criteria: 26410
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 25841.2
Average stars matched: 24516.5 (94.8735 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 130760 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed May 6 12:14:36 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-43-g0c21e0c3
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri May 8 00:09:02 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_000141_TTUQ2b1x1_1223607_t5Ns6Gt0/fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_000141_TTUQ2b1x1_1223607_t5Ns6Gt0/fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_000141_TTUQ2b1x1_1223607_t5Ns6Gt0/fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_000141_TTUQ2b1x1_1223607_t5Ns6Gt0/fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461168.70868228
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits'
wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits'
wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits'
wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits
Image size: 941.8'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:59:59.773 -02:00:02.82 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits
util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:00:00.335 -01:59:58.63 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:59:59.773 -02:00:02.82
Second-epoch image center 12:00:00.335 -01:59:58.63
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0026 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:59:58.789 -01:59:55.39 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:59:59.773 -02:00:02.82
Second-epoch image center 11:59:58.789 -01:59:55.39
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0046 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 12:00:00.335 -01:59:58.63
Second-epoch second image center 11:59:58.789 -01:59:55.39
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00650 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits &> /tmp/tmp.JK4CKDMC4b
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits &> /tmp/tmp.yIfXqmWrV3
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_000141_TTUQ2b1x1_1223607_t5Ns6Gt0/fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits &> /tmp/tmp.qfarSZOQmk
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_000141_TTUQ2b1x1_1223607_t5Ns6Gt0/fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_000141_TTUQ2b1x1_1223607_t5Ns6Gt0/fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits &> /tmp/tmp.cTzRqaSDdA
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_000141_TTUQ2b1x1_1223607_t5Ns6Gt0/fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits and wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits and wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits and wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits) and catalog (wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 5852 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 172.0998 to 187.9210 deg, Dec -7.2990 to +3.3108 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 172.0998 to 187.9210 deg, Dec -7.2990 to 3.3108 deg
Loaded 3755 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3122 out of 3271 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3271 out of 5852 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.893250
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.893250
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.74
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.15
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.15
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 5852 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 172.0998 to 187.9210 deg, Dec -7.2990 to +3.3108 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 172.0998 to 187.9210 deg, Dec -7.2990 to 3.3108 deg
Loaded 3755 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3122 out of 3271 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3271 out of 5852 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits (aperture=6.4)
Read 5784 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 171.8081 to 188.1615 deg, Dec -7.7215 to +3.7639 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 171.8081 to 188.1615 deg, Dec -7.7215 to 3.7639 deg
Loaded 4166 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3130 out of 3252 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3252 out of 5784 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits (aperture=6.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 3 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits
2.2 pix Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
2.3 pix fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits
2.4 pix fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits
15.2 mag. Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
15.2 mag. fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits
15.2 mag. fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.2 (SNR ) 12.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.JK4CKDMC4b (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-08_CI_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_000141_TTUQ2b1x1_1223607_t5Ns6Gt0/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=443, passed=5852
Got 5852 stars (including 5404 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5852 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 980 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 973 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5821 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 980 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5820 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5820 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 980 stars left (next iteration limit 1078)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits -region wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.yIfXqmWrV3 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-08_CI_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_000141_TTUQ2b1x1_1223607_t5Ns6Gt0/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=413, passed=5784
Got 5784 stars (including 5364 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5784 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 973 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5726 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5725 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5725 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 978 stars left (next iteration limit 1075)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits -region wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.qfarSZOQmk (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-08_CI_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_000141_TTUQ2b1x1_1223607_t5Ns6Gt0/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_000141_TTUQ2b1x1_1223607_t5Ns6Gt0/fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_000141_TTUQ2b1x1_1223607_t5Ns6Gt0/fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_000141_TTUQ2b1x1_1223607_t5Ns6Gt0/fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_000141_TTUQ2b1x1_1223607_t5Ns6Gt0/fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_000141_TTUQ2b1x1_1223607_t5Ns6Gt0/fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_000141_TTUQ2b1x1_1223607_t5Ns6Gt0/fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_000141_TTUQ2b1x1_1223607_t5Ns6Gt0/fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=360, passed=5768
Got 5768 stars (including 5401 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5768 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 972 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5751 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5750 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5750 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 976 stars left (next iteration limit 1073)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_000141_TTUQ2b1x1_1223607_t5Ns6Gt0/fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits -region wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.cTzRqaSDdA (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-08_CI_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_000141_TTUQ2b1x1_1223607_t5Ns6Gt0/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_000141_TTUQ2b1x1_1223607_t5Ns6Gt0/fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_000141_TTUQ2b1x1_1223607_t5Ns6Gt0/fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_000141_TTUQ2b1x1_1223607_t5Ns6Gt0/fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_000141_TTUQ2b1x1_1223607_t5Ns6Gt0/fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_000141_TTUQ2b1x1_1223607_t5Ns6Gt0/fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_000141_TTUQ2b1x1_1223607_t5Ns6Gt0/fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_000141_TTUQ2b1x1_1223607_t5Ns6Gt0/fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=354, passed=5795
Got 5795 stars (including 5436 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5795 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 975 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5774 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5771 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5771 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 978 stars left (next iteration limit 1075)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_000141_TTUQ2b1x1_1223607_t5Ns6Gt0/fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits -region wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_000141_TTUQ2b1x1_1223607_t5Ns6Gt0/wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_000141_TTUQ2b1x1_1223607_t5Ns6Gt0/wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Vir-06-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits at 12:08:03.16 -02:24:05.1: 12.25 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits at 12:08:03.16 -02:24:05.1: 12.28 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.26 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:08:03.16 -02:24:05.1: ref_mag=12.26 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2402 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20457_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150
The candidate 20457_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:27:01.92 -03:32:28.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20458_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150
The candidate 20458_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20459_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150
The candidate 20459_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:49:48.70 +00:37:09.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Vir-06-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_000141_TTUQ2b1x1_1223607_t5Ns6Gt0/fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_000141_TTUQ2b1x1_1223607_t5Ns6Gt0/fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_000141_TTUQ2b1x1_1223607_t5Ns6Gt0/fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_000141_TTUQ2b1x1_1223607_t5Ns6Gt0/fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits
Image size: 941.8'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:59:59.773 -02:00:02.82 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:00:00.335 -01:59:58.63 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:59:59.773 -02:00:02.82
Second-epoch image center 12:00:00.335 -01:59:58.63
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0026 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:59:58.789 -01:59:55.39 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:59:59.773 -02:00:02.82
Second-epoch image center 11:59:58.789 -01:59:55.39
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0046 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 12:00:00.335 -01:59:58.63
Second-epoch second image center 11:59:58.789 -01:59:55.39
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00650 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits &> /tmp/tmp.89TrO092WK
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits &> /tmp/tmp.rNdrh2Y7BN
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_000141_TTUQ2b1x1_1223607_t5Ns6Gt0/fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits &> /tmp/tmp.mW9QwzhcwO
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_000141_TTUQ2b1x1_1223607_t5Ns6Gt0/fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_000141_TTUQ2b1x1_1223607_t5Ns6Gt0/fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits &> /tmp/tmp.BLoAqhxhfE
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_000141_TTUQ2b1x1_1223607_t5Ns6Gt0/fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits and wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits and wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits and wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits) and catalog (wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 32492 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 172.0947 to 187.9493 deg, Dec -7.3038 to +3.3170 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 172.0947 to 187.9493 deg, Dec -7.3038 to 3.3170 deg
Loaded 3770 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3039 out of 3314 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3314 out of 32492 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.755400
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.755400
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.40
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.36
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.36
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 32492 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 172.0947 to 187.9493 deg, Dec -7.3038 to +3.3170 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 172.0947 to 187.9493 deg, Dec -7.3038 to 3.3170 deg
Loaded 3770 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3039 out of 3314 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3314 out of 32492 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits (aperture=4.9)
Read 33433 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 171.7993 to 188.2138 deg, Dec -7.7228 to +3.7639 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 171.7993 to 188.2138 deg, Dec -7.7228 to 3.7639 deg
Loaded 4179 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3062 out of 3307 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3307 out of 33433 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits (aperture=4.8)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 91 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits
2.1 pix Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
2.1 pix fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits
2.1 pix fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits
15.4 mag. Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
15.4 mag. fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits
15.4 mag. fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.4 (SNR ) 14.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.89TrO092WK (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-08_CI_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_000141_TTUQ2b1x1_1223607_t5Ns6Gt0/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=1375, passed=32479
Got 32479 stars (including 31051 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 32479 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 980 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 974 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32410 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 980 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32410 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32410 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 980 stars left (next iteration limit 1078)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits -region wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.rNdrh2Y7BN (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-08_CI_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_000141_TTUQ2b1x1_1223607_t5Ns6Gt0/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=1372, passed=33420
Got 33420 stars (including 32000 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 33420 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 981 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 981 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 974 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 981 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33094 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 981 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 981 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33094 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 981 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33094 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 981 stars left (next iteration limit 1079)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits -region wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.mW9QwzhcwO (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-08_CI_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_000141_TTUQ2b1x1_1223607_t5Ns6Gt0/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_000141_TTUQ2b1x1_1223607_t5Ns6Gt0/fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_000141_TTUQ2b1x1_1223607_t5Ns6Gt0/fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_000141_TTUQ2b1x1_1223607_t5Ns6Gt0/fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_000141_TTUQ2b1x1_1223607_t5Ns6Gt0/fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_000141_TTUQ2b1x1_1223607_t5Ns6Gt0/fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_000141_TTUQ2b1x1_1223607_t5Ns6Gt0/fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_000141_TTUQ2b1x1_1223607_t5Ns6Gt0/fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=1328, passed=31665
Got 31665 stars (including 30296 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 31665 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 979 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 973 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31575 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 979 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31576 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31576 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Excluding outliers - 979 stars left (next iteration limit 1076)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_000141_TTUQ2b1x1_1223607_t5Ns6Gt0/fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits -region wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.BLoAqhxhfE (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-08_CI_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_000141_TTUQ2b1x1_1223607_t5Ns6Gt0/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_000141_TTUQ2b1x1_1223607_t5Ns6Gt0/fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_000141_TTUQ2b1x1_1223607_t5Ns6Gt0/fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_000141_TTUQ2b1x1_1223607_t5Ns6Gt0/fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_000141_TTUQ2b1x1_1223607_t5Ns6Gt0/fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_000141_TTUQ2b1x1_1223607_t5Ns6Gt0/fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_000141_TTUQ2b1x1_1223607_t5Ns6Gt0/fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_000141_TTUQ2b1x1_1223607_t5Ns6Gt0/fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=14, blended=1320, passed=31535
Got 31535 stars (including 30180 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 31535 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 980 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 974 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31449 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 980 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31451 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31451 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Excluding outliers - 980 stars left (next iteration limit 1078)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_000141_TTUQ2b1x1_1223607_t5Ns6Gt0/fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits -region wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_000141_TTUQ2b1x1_1223607_t5Ns6Gt0/wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-00-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0149.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-08_CI_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_000141_TTUQ2b1x1_1223607_t5Ns6Gt0/wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Vir-06-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits at 11:44:19.83 -00:55:51.4: 13.98 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits at 12:05:26.02 -01:52:13.6: 14.88 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits at 12:09:15.75 -00:55:23.1: 14.22 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits at 12:05:10.33 -00:57:01.5: 14.84 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits at 12:05:59.96 -01:56:31.0: 15.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits at 11:53:55.21 +01:13:37.6: 16.02 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits at 12:05:26.02 -01:52:13.6: 15.06 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits at 11:44:19.83 -00:55:51.4: 14.10 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.96 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:05:26.02 -01:52:13.6: ref_mag=14.96 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.9142 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.04 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:44:19.83 -00:55:51.4: ref_mag=14.04 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.4299 delta=-0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits at 12:05:10.33 -00:57:01.5: 14.71 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.77 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:05:10.33 -00:57:01.5: ref_mag=14.77 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.8685 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits at 12:09:15.75 -00:55:23.1: 14.51 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.32 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:09:15.75 -00:55:23.1: ref_mag=14.32 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.5817 delta=-0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits at 12:22:50.62 +01:47:05.0: 15.81 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits at 12:05:59.96 -01:56:31.0: 16.01 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits at 11:53:55.21 +01:13:37.6: 16.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits at 12:17:39.81 -03:10:44.4: 15.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits at 12:22:50.62 +01:47:05.0: 15.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits at 12:17:39.81 -03:10:44.4: 15.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits at 11:56:00.51 -01:45:38.5: 16.10 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits at 11:56:00.51 -01:45:38.5: 16.16 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits at 12:06:07.75 +00:59:15.6: 14.89 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits at 12:00:40.71 -01:47:46.4: 16.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits at 12:05:40.22 -04:09:21.5: 14.81 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits at 12:12:57.26 +01:18:38.2: 14.44 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits at 12:17:15.29 -02:46:41.0: 14.84 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits at 12:06:07.75 +00:59:15.6: 14.81 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.85 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:06:07.75 +00:59:15.6: ref_mag=14.85 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.7149 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits at 12:05:40.22 -04:09:21.5: 14.64 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.71 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:05:40.22 -04:09:21.5: ref_mag=14.71 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.6546 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits at 12:00:40.71 -01:47:46.4: 16.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits at 12:12:57.26 +01:18:38.2: 14.59 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.51 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits at 12:17:15.29 -02:46:41.0: 14.66 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:12:57.26 +01:18:38.2: ref_mag=14.51 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.7113 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.74 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:17:15.29 -02:46:41.0: ref_mag=14.74 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.7867 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits at 12:14:31.24 -05:57:10.0: 14.85 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits at 12:12:44.25 -03:28:18.6: 15.35 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits at 12:09:46.60 +00:56:17.7: 15.02 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits at 12:14:31.24 -05:57:10.0: 14.94 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.89 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:14:31.24 -05:57:10.0: ref_mag=14.89 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.8564 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits at 12:12:44.25 -03:28:18.6: 15.36 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.35 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:12:44.25 -03:28:18.6: ref_mag=15.35 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.9160 delta=0.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits at 12:09:46.60 +00:56:17.7: 15.11 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.07 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:09:46.60 +00:56:17.7: ref_mag=15.07 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.9188 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits at 12:26:23.85 -04:56:56.9: 14.79 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits at 12:26:23.85 -04:56:56.9: 14.85 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.82 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:26:23.85 -04:56:56.9: ref_mag=14.82 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.8083 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits at 11:59:19.03 -04:53:06.0: 14.98 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits at 11:59:19.03 -04:53:06.0: 14.92 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.95 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:59:19.03 -04:53:06.0: ref_mag=14.95 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.9378 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53299.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53300.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53308.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53311.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53378.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53465.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 8s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 5s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53269_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150
The candidate 53269_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53270_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150
The candidate 53270_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53272_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150
The candidate 53272_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53274_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150
The candidate 53274_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53282_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150
The candidate 53282_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:06:31.34 -04:36:09.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53286_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150
The candidate 53286_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53287_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150
The candidate 53287_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:03:31.86 -02:25:58.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53292_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150
The candidate 53292_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53294_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150
The candidate 53294_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53296_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150
The candidate 53296_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53297_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150
The candidate 53297_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53299_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150
Preparing report for the candidate 53299_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53300_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150
Preparing report for the candidate 53300_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53302_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150
The candidate 53302_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53303_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150
The candidate 53303_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53305_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150
The candidate 53305_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53306_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150
The candidate 53306_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:18:06.14 -01:50:24.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53307_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150
The candidate 53307_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53308_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150
Preparing report for the candidate 53308_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53310_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150
The candidate 53310_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:52:15.30 +00:16:51.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53311_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150
Preparing report for the candidate 53311_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53320_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150
The candidate 53320_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:26:14.27 +00:32:06.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53321_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150
The candidate 53321_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:45:21.20 -04:26:06.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53322_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150
The candidate 53322_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:56:59.87 +00:37:04.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53323_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150
The candidate 53323_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:42:30.10 -04:40:00.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53329_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150
The candidate 53329_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53335_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150
The candidate 53335_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:50:31.96 -02:24:59.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53336_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150
The candidate 53336_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:55:20.33 -03:36:30.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53342_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150
The candidate 53342_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53343_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150
The candidate 53343_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53344_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150
The candidate 53344_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:50:23.62 -01:14:36.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53352_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150
The candidate 53352_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53358_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150
The candidate 53358_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53364_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150
The candidate 53364_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:58:39.95 -00:48:06.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53368_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150
The candidate 53368_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53370_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150
The candidate 53370_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53372_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150
The candidate 53372_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53373_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150
The candidate 53373_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53378_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150
Preparing report for the candidate 53378_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53380_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150
The candidate 53380_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53381_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150
The candidate 53381_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:05:55.67 -02:28:55.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53383_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150
The candidate 53383_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:56:52.42 -02:35:25.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53386_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150
The candidate 53386_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53390_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150
The candidate 53390_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53393_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150
The candidate 53393_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53394_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150
The candidate 53394_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53397_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150
The candidate 53397_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53398_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150
The candidate 53398_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53400_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150
The candidate 53400_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53403_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150
The candidate 53403_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:51:06.38 +01:47:23.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53406_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150
The candidate 53406_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53408_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150
The candidate 53408_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53410_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150
The candidate 53410_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:58:16.77 +00:56:55.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53414_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150
The candidate 53414_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53415_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150
The candidate 53415_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53416_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150
The candidate 53416_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53418_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150
The candidate 53418_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53420_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150
The candidate 53420_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53424_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150
The candidate 53424_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53427_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150
The candidate 53427_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53431_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150
The candidate 53431_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53442_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150
The candidate 53442_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:12:09.33 +01:09:10.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53445_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150
The candidate 53445_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53447_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150
The candidate 53447_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53449_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150
The candidate 53449_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53451_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150
The candidate 53451_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53453_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150
The candidate 53453_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53455_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150
The candidate 53455_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53458_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150
The candidate 53458_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53461_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150
The candidate 53461_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53464_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150
The candidate 53464_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53465_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150
Preparing report for the candidate 53465_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53466_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150
The candidate 53466_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53467_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150
The candidate 53467_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53468_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150
The candidate 53468_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53472_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150
The candidate 53472_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53476_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150
The candidate 53476_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53479_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150
The candidate 53479_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53480_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150
The candidate 53480_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:59:41.16 -03:46:41.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53482_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150
The candidate 53482_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53485_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150
The candidate 53485_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53488_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150
The candidate 53488_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:10:23.95 +00:37:22.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53496_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150
The candidate 53496_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53497_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150
The candidate 53497_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53501_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150
The candidate 53501_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53508_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150
The candidate 53508_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53521_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150
The candidate 53521_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53525_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150
The candidate 53525_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53532_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150
The candidate 53532_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53534_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150
The candidate 53534_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:26:06.55 -01:26:21.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53541_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150
The candidate 53541_fd_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150 did not pass the final checks
