This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_235013_TTUQ1b1x1_527680_M9NrAfOg
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 08.2007 2461168.7007 11.24 10:16:36.83 +15:00:43.7
223.54375 52.08495 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 2.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.11 Parthenope -2 1 2 11.7 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 10:16:36.83 +15:00:43.7: 15.76 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits at 10:16:36.83 +15:00:43.7: 15.68 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 08.2007* 10 16 36.83 +15 00 43.7 11.2 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461168.7007,11.24,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260508.2007 11.24CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 08.2007 2461168.7007 11.98 09:20:07.27 +11:30:42.9
219.67677 38.16360 galactic Cnc Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 2.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.41 Daphne -2 1 2 12.0 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 09:20:07.27 +11:30:42.9: 15.64 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits at 09:20:07.27 +11:30:42.9: 15.71 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461168.7007,11.98,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260508.2007 11.98CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 08.2007 2461168.7007 13.08 09:56:12.16 +15:48:51.2
219.27746 47.92071 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 2.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.103 Hera -2 2 3 13.1 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 09:56:12.16 +15:48:51.2: 16.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits at 09:56:12.16 +15:48:51.2: 16.07 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 08.2007* 09 56 12.16 +15 48 51.2 13.1 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461168.7007,13.08,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260508.2007 13.08CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 08.2007 2461168.7007 13.37 09:40:30.63 +09:37:08.1
224.82593 41.78855 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 2.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.67 Asia -2 1 2 13.6 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 09:40:30.63 +09:37:08.1: 15.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits at 09:40:30.63 +09:37:08.1: 16.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 08.2007* 09 40 30.63 +09 37 08.1 13.4 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461168.7007,13.37,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260508.2007 13.37CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 08.2007 2461168.7007 13.91 10:08:46.54 +16:47:08.2
219.70700 51.07779 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 2.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.161 Athor -1 1 2 14.2 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 10:08:46.54 +16:47:08.2: 15.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits at 10:08:46.54 +16:47:08.2: 15.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 08.2007* 10 08 46.54 +16 47 08.2 13.9 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461168.7007,13.91,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260508.2007 13.91CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 08.2007 2461168.7007 13.90 09:43:13.59 +15:49:05.0
217.50348 45.04820 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.8" and 2.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.47 Aglaja -3 2 4 14.0 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 09:43:13.59 +15:49:05.0: 16.03 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits at 09:43:13.59 +15:49:05.0: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 08.2007* 09 43 13.59 +15 49 05.0 13.9 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461168.7007,13.90,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260508.2007 13.90CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 08.2007 2461168.7007 14.36 10:15:46.01 +10:02:29.4
230.35819 49.58358 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 2.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.808 Merxia -1 2 2 14.8 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 10:15:46.01 +10:02:29.4: 15.78 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits at 10:15:46.01 +10:02:29.4: 15.71 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 08.2007* 10 15 46.01 +10 02 29.4 14.4 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461168.7007,14.36,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260508.2007 14.36CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 08.2007 2461168.7007 14.85 10:15:05.73 +18:00:21.7
218.78739 52.93309 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 2.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.909 Ulla -0 2 2 15.2 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 10:15:05.73 +18:00:21.7: 15.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits at 10:15:05.73 +18:00:21.7: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 08.2007* 10 15 05.73 +18 00 21.7 14.8 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461168.7007,14.85,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260508.2007 14.85CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 08.2007 2461168.7007 14.94 09:48:44.89 +18:24:40.7
214.72290 47.22883 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 2.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.578 Happelia -2 2 3 15.1 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 09:48:44.89 +18:24:40.7: 16.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits at 09:48:44.89 +18:24:40.7: 16.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 08.2007* 09 48 44.89 +18 24 40.7 14.9 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461168.7007,14.94,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260508.2007 14.94CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461119.68287475 20.03.2026 04:23:10.378 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
First image: 2461119.68287475 20.03.2026 04:23:10.378 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Last image: 2461168.70102874 08.05.2026 04:49:18.883 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_235013_TTUQ1b1x1_527680_M9NrAfOg/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 3
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.63
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 7230
Objects passed selection criteria: 7226
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 6983.5
Average stars matched: 6881 (98.5323 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 113092 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed May 6 12:14:36 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-43-g0c21e0c3
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu May 7 23:52:56 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461119.68287475 20.03.2026 04:23:10.378 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
First image: 2461119.68287475 20.03.2026 04:23:10.378 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Last image: 2461168.70102874 08.05.2026 04:49:18.883 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_235013_TTUQ1b1x1_527680_M9NrAfOg/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 187
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.35
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 17 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 41497
Objects passed selection criteria: 41375
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 40058.8
Average stars matched: 38443.5 (95.9678 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 141284 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed May 6 12:14:36 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-43-g0c21e0c3
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu May 7 23:54:52 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_235013_TTUQ1b1x1_527680_M9NrAfOg/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0218.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_235013_TTUQ1b1x1_527680_M9NrAfOg/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_235013_TTUQ1b1x1_527680_M9NrAfOg/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0218.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_235013_TTUQ1b1x1_527680_M9NrAfOg/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461168.70038266
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits'
wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits'
wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0218.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0218.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0218.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0218.fits'
wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:46:31.742 +14:00:33.63 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0218.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0218.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:46:40.074 +14:00:35.19 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 09:46:31.742 +14:00:33.63
Second-epoch image center 09:46:40.074 +14:00:35.19
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0337 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:46:39.834 +14:00:20.83 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 09:46:31.742 +14:00:33.63
Second-epoch image center 09:46:39.834 +14:00:20.83
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0329 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 09:46:40.074 +14:00:35.19
Second-epoch second image center 09:46:39.834 +14:00:20.83
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00411 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Ab9ETVyH7h
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits &> /tmp/tmp.SgJS3meOPg
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_235013_TTUQ1b1x1_527680_M9NrAfOg/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0218.fits &> /tmp/tmp.EbZOY6KDjC
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_235013_TTUQ1b1x1_527680_M9NrAfOg/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0218.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_235013_TTUQ1b1x1_527680_M9NrAfOg/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Lw6frtAdlw
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_235013_TTUQ1b1x1_527680_M9NrAfOg/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits and wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits and wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
The guess is 570 arcmin.
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
The reference image (wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits) and catalog (wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 7795 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 138.4789 to 154.9675 deg, Dec +8.5563 to +19.3047 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 138.4789 to 154.9675 deg, Dec 8.5563 to 19.3047 deg
Loaded 4793 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3886 out of 4074 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4074 out of 7795 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.915650
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.915650
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.63
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.29
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.29
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 7795 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 138.4789 to 154.9675 deg, Dec +8.5563 to +19.3047 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 138.4789 to 154.9675 deg, Dec 8.5563 to 19.3047 deg
Loaded 4793 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3886 out of 4074 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4074 out of 7795 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits (aperture=6.6)
Read 7228 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 138.4295 to 155.2660 deg, Dec +8.1771 to +19.5842 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 138.4295 to 155.2660 deg, Dec 8.1771 to 19.5842 deg
Loaded 5215 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3899 out of 4084 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4084 out of 7228 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 3 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.4 pix Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
2.1 pix Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
2.2 pix fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0218.fits
2.2 pix fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits
2.4 pix wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
15.3 mag. Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
15.1 mag. fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0218.fits
15.1 mag. fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.1 (SNR ) 12.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.Ab9ETVyH7h (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_235013_TTUQ1b1x1_527680_M9NrAfOg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=485, passed=7795
Got 7795 stars (including 7304 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7795 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 906 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 883 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7515 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 906 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7517 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7517 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Excluding outliers - 906 stars left (next iteration limit 996)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits -region wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.SgJS3meOPg (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_235013_TTUQ1b1x1_527680_M9NrAfOg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_235013_TTUQ1b1x1_527680_M9NrAfOg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh: line 129: echo: write error: Broken pipe
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=490, passed=7228
Got 7228 stars (including 6724 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7228 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 490 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 912 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 897 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6991 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 490 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 912 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6991 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6991 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 912 stars left (next iteration limit 1003)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits -region wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.EbZOY6KDjC (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_235013_TTUQ1b1x1_527680_M9NrAfOg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_235013_TTUQ1b1x1_527680_M9NrAfOg/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0218.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_235013_TTUQ1b1x1_527680_M9NrAfOg/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0218.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_235013_TTUQ1b1x1_527680_M9NrAfOg/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0218.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_235013_TTUQ1b1x1_527680_M9NrAfOg/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0218.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_235013_TTUQ1b1x1_527680_M9NrAfOg/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0218.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_235013_TTUQ1b1x1_527680_M9NrAfOg/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0218.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0218.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0218.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0218.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0218.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0218.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0218.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0218.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_235013_TTUQ1b1x1_527680_M9NrAfOg/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0218.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0218.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=440, passed=6565
Got 6565 stars (including 6117 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0218.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6565 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 911 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 890 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6368 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 911 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6371 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6371 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 911 stars left (next iteration limit 1002)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0218.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0218.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_235013_TTUQ1b1x1_527680_M9NrAfOg/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0218.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0218.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0218.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Lw6frtAdlw (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_235013_TTUQ1b1x1_527680_M9NrAfOg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_235013_TTUQ1b1x1_527680_M9NrAfOg/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_235013_TTUQ1b1x1_527680_M9NrAfOg/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_235013_TTUQ1b1x1_527680_M9NrAfOg/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_235013_TTUQ1b1x1_527680_M9NrAfOg/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_235013_TTUQ1b1x1_527680_M9NrAfOg/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_235013_TTUQ1b1x1_527680_M9NrAfOg/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_235013_TTUQ1b1x1_527680_M9NrAfOg/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=457, passed=6520
Got 6520 stars (including 6050 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6520 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 914 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 900 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6316 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 914 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6316 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6316 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 914 stars left (next iteration limit 1005)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_235013_TTUQ1b1x1_527680_M9NrAfOg/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0218.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0218.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_235013_TTUQ1b1x1_527680_M9NrAfOg/wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0218.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_235013_TTUQ1b1x1_527680_M9NrAfOg/wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Leo-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 09:20:07.27 +11:30:42.9: 15.64 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 10:16:36.83 +15:00:43.7: 15.76 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 09:31:11.94 +15:34:41.0: 11.93 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits at 09:20:07.27 +11:30:42.9: 15.71 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits at 10:16:36.83 +15:00:43.7: 15.68 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits at 09:31:11.94 +15:34:41.0: 12.08 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.00 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:31:11.94 +15:34:41.0: ref_mag=12.00 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4340 delta=-0.44 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20368.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20371.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 7s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20368_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
Preparing report for the candidate 20368_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20371_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
Preparing report for the candidate 20371_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20376_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 20376_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 9s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Leo-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
10:16:36.83 +15:00:43.7
09:20:07.27 +11:30:42.9
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_235013_TTUQ1b1x1_527680_M9NrAfOg/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0218.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_235013_TTUQ1b1x1_527680_M9NrAfOg/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_235013_TTUQ1b1x1_527680_M9NrAfOg/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0218.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_235013_TTUQ1b1x1_527680_M9NrAfOg/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0218.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0218.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:46:31.742 +14:00:33.63 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0218.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0218.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:46:40.074 +14:00:35.19 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 09:46:31.742 +14:00:33.63
Second-epoch image center 09:46:40.074 +14:00:35.19
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0337 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:46:39.834 +14:00:20.83 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 09:46:31.742 +14:00:33.63
Second-epoch image center 09:46:39.834 +14:00:20.83
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0329 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 09:46:40.074 +14:00:35.19
Second-epoch second image center 09:46:39.834 +14:00:20.83
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00411 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits &> /tmp/tmp.M18irRivY1
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits &> /tmp/tmp.mIqildt0GW
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_235013_TTUQ1b1x1_527680_M9NrAfOg/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0218.fits &> /tmp/tmp.rAOBEfcbkq
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_235013_TTUQ1b1x1_527680_M9NrAfOg/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0218.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_235013_TTUQ1b1x1_527680_M9NrAfOg/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits &> /tmp/tmp.EjDNB43glI
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_235013_TTUQ1b1x1_527680_M9NrAfOg/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits and wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits and wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits and wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits) and catalog (wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 41224 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 138.4723 to 154.9674 deg, Dec +8.5474 to +19.3051 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 138.4723 to 154.9674 deg, Dec 8.5474 to 19.3051 deg
Loaded 4805 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3684 out of 4105 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4105 out of 41224 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.791850
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.791850
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.35
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.44
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.44
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 41224 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 138.4723 to 154.9674 deg, Dec +8.5474 to +19.3051 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 138.4723 to 154.9674 deg, Dec 8.5474 to 19.3051 deg
Loaded 4805 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3684 out of 4105 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4105 out of 41224 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits (aperture=5.1)
Read 42226 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 138.3858 to 155.2947 deg, Dec +8.1221 to +19.5907 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 138.3858 to 155.2947 deg, Dec 8.1221 to 19.5907 deg
Loaded 5272 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3734 out of 4128 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4128 out of 42226 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits (aperture=4.8)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 163 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
2.0 pix Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
2.0 pix fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0218.fits
2.0 pix fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
2.0 pix wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
15.4 mag. Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
15.3 mag. fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0218.fits
15.3 mag. fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.3 (SNR ) 14.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.M18irRivY1 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_235013_TTUQ1b1x1_527680_M9NrAfOg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=22, blended=1984, passed=41202
Got 41202 stars (including 39163 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 41202 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 904 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 879 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39941 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 904 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39939 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39938 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 904 stars left (next iteration limit 994)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits -region wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.mIqildt0GW (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_235013_TTUQ1b1x1_527680_M9NrAfOg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=16, blended=1796, passed=42210
Got 42210 stars (including 40354 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 42210 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 490 to 549 (Dec 8.1 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 911 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 899 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41062 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 490 to 549 (Dec 8.1 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 911 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41060 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41060 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 911 stars left (next iteration limit 1002)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits -region wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.rAOBEfcbkq (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_235013_TTUQ1b1x1_527680_M9NrAfOg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_235013_TTUQ1b1x1_527680_M9NrAfOg/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0218.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_235013_TTUQ1b1x1_527680_M9NrAfOg/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0218.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_235013_TTUQ1b1x1_527680_M9NrAfOg/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0218.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_235013_TTUQ1b1x1_527680_M9NrAfOg/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0218.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_235013_TTUQ1b1x1_527680_M9NrAfOg/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0218.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_235013_TTUQ1b1x1_527680_M9NrAfOg/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0218.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0218.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0218.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0218.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0218.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0218.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0218.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0218.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_235013_TTUQ1b1x1_527680_M9NrAfOg/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0218.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0218.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=27, blended=1628, passed=38878
Got 38878 stars (including 37192 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0218.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 38878 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 909 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 891 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37765 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 909 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37766 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37766 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 909 stars left (next iteration limit 999)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0218.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0218.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_235013_TTUQ1b1x1_527680_M9NrAfOg/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0218.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0218.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0218.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.EjDNB43glI (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_235013_TTUQ1b1x1_527680_M9NrAfOg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_235013_TTUQ1b1x1_527680_M9NrAfOg/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_235013_TTUQ1b1x1_527680_M9NrAfOg/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_235013_TTUQ1b1x1_527680_M9NrAfOg/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_235013_TTUQ1b1x1_527680_M9NrAfOg/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_235013_TTUQ1b1x1_527680_M9NrAfOg/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_235013_TTUQ1b1x1_527680_M9NrAfOg/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_235013_TTUQ1b1x1_527680_M9NrAfOg/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=34, blended=1649, passed=39134
Got 39134 stars (including 37413 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 39134 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 911 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 896 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37940 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 911 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37938 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37938 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 911 stars left (next iteration limit 1002)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_235013_TTUQ1b1x1_527680_M9NrAfOg/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0218.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_235013_TTUQ1b1x1_527680_M9NrAfOg/wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0218.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_235013_TTUQ1b1x1_527680_M9NrAfOg/wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Leo-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 10:14:41.33 +14:12:59.9: 14.80 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits at 10:14:41.33 +14:12:59.9: 14.61 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.69 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:14:41.33 +14:12:59.9: ref_mag=14.69 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.6716 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 09:56:12.16 +15:48:51.2: 16.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits at 09:56:12.16 +15:48:51.2: 16.07 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 09:40:30.63 +09:37:08.1: 15.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 10:08:46.54 +16:47:08.2: 15.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 09:43:13.59 +15:49:05.0: 16.03 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits at 09:40:30.63 +09:37:08.1: 16.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits at 10:08:46.54 +16:47:08.2: 15.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits at 09:43:13.59 +15:49:05.0: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 10:06:37.32 +17:54:42.8: 14.33 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 10:15:46.01 +10:02:29.4: 15.78 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 09:17:31.81 +10:51:15.1: 14.38 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits at 10:06:37.32 +17:54:42.8: 14.38 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.35 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits at 10:15:46.01 +10:02:29.4: 15.71 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:06:37.32 +17:54:42.8: ref_mag=14.35 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.2184 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits at 09:17:31.81 +10:51:15.1: 14.32 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.34 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:17:31.81 +10:51:15.1: ref_mag=14.34 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.2665 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 09:28:34.99 +12:12:31.2: 14.47 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 10:16:59.64 +10:05:19.7: 15.26 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits at 09:28:34.99 +12:12:31.2: 14.71 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.57 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:28:34.99 +12:12:31.2: ref_mag=14.57 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.5561 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 09:32:36.48 +19:16:51.3: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 10:19:02.07 +18:08:31.6: 14.46 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits at 10:16:59.64 +10:05:19.7: 15.00 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.12 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:16:59.64 +10:05:19.7: ref_mag=15.12 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.4886 delta=0.63 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits at 09:32:36.48 +19:16:51.3: 14.78 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:32:36.48 +19:16:51.3: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits at 10:19:02.07 +18:08:31.6: 14.67 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.54 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:19:02.07 +18:08:31.6: ref_mag=14.54 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.7056 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 10:17:52.48 +16:43:30.5: 15.23 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 09:25:39.53 +18:49:29.2: 15.31 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 10:15:05.73 +18:00:21.7: 15.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 09:18:08.76 +16:21:15.2: 14.67 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 10:15:52.88 +18:23:05.1: 14.68 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits at 10:17:52.48 +16:43:30.5: 14.98 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.08 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:17:52.48 +16:43:30.5: ref_mag=15.08 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.8253 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits at 09:25:39.53 +18:49:29.2: 15.15 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.21 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:25:39.53 +18:49:29.2: ref_mag=15.21 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.9234 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits at 10:15:05.73 +18:00:21.7: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits at 10:15:52.88 +18:23:05.1: 15.01 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits at 09:18:08.76 +16:21:15.2: 14.82 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.79 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.74 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:15:52.88 +18:23:05.1: ref_mag=14.79 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.8541 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:18:08.76 +16:21:15.2: ref_mag=14.74 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.7498 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 09:21:45.61 +10:17:08.6: 14.83 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 10:08:30.32 +09:21:31.9: 15.28 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 10:17:26.94 +12:07:04.6: 14.81 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 10:15:02.88 +09:10:10.6: 15.34 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits at 09:21:45.61 +10:17:08.6: 14.76 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.79 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:21:45.61 +10:17:08.6: ref_mag=14.79 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.6341 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits at 10:17:26.94 +12:07:04.6: 15.19 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.93 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits at 10:15:02.88 +09:10:10.6: 14.72 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:17:26.94 +12:07:04.6: ref_mag=14.93 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.4385 delta=0.49 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits at 10:08:30.32 +09:21:31.9: 14.63 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.89 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:15:02.88 +09:10:10.6: ref_mag=14.89 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.4650 delta=0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.80 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:08:30.32 +09:21:31.9: ref_mag=14.80 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.6955 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 09:48:44.89 +18:24:40.7: 16.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 09:15:06.74 +15:59:19.5: 14.90 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 10:03:42.07 +12:05:26.8: 15.00 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 09:16:34.48 +17:55:09.0: 14.84 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits at 09:48:44.89 +18:24:40.7: 16.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits at 09:15:06.74 +15:59:19.5: 14.89 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.90 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits at 09:16:34.48 +17:55:09.0: 14.89 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:15:06.74 +15:59:19.5: ref_mag=14.90 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.7481 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits at 10:03:42.07 +12:05:26.8: 15.39 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.87 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:16:34.48 +17:55:09.0: ref_mag=14.87 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.8988 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.12 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:03:42.07 +12:05:26.8: ref_mag=15.12 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.9079 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 09:19:25.40 +16:30:20.7: 15.78 +/- 0.34 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 10:09:40.58 +09:18:30.7: 14.83 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits at 10:09:40.58 +09:18:30.7: 15.01 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits at 09:19:25.40 +16:30:20.7: 15.00 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.90 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.14 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:09:40.58 +09:18:30.7: ref_mag=14.90 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.6114 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:19:25.40 +16:30:20.7: ref_mag=15.14 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.9721 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 10:03:52.26 +15:40:29.1: 14.60 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 10:15:50.70 +12:47:22.4: 15.03 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 10:11:36.06 +09:49:05.3: 15.42 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits at 10:03:52.26 +15:40:29.1: 14.84 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.69 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:03:52.26 +15:40:29.1: ref_mag=14.69 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.7541 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits at 10:11:36.06 +09:49:05.3: 14.99 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.14 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:11:36.06 +09:49:05.3: ref_mag=15.14 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.7535 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits at 10:15:50.70 +12:47:22.4: 15.46 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.16 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:15:50.70 +12:47:22.4: ref_mag=15.16 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.9421 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 10:01:28.16 +14:00:36.7: 14.96 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 10:09:30.81 +09:05:43.6: 15.12 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits at 10:01:28.16 +14:00:36.7: 15.18 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.04 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:01:28.16 +14:00:36.7: ref_mag=15.04 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.8765 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 09:21:39.78 +14:04:46.6: 14.95 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits at 10:09:30.81 +09:05:43.6: 14.85 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.96 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:09:30.81 +09:05:43.6: ref_mag=14.96 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.7497 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits at 09:21:39.78 +14:04:46.6: 15.09 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.01 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:21:39.78 +14:04:46.6: ref_mag=15.01 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.9435 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 10:14:14.77 +08:43:02.8: 14.99 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 09:36:50.51 +12:25:23.0: 14.78 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits at 10:14:14.77 +08:43:02.8: 15.09 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.03 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:14:14.77 +08:43:02.8: ref_mag=15.03 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.5382 delta=0.49 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 10:15:56.27 +10:37:14.7: 15.38 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 10:03:32.54 +10:17:51.6: 15.16 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits at 09:36:50.51 +12:25:23.0: 14.85 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.81 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:36:50.51 +12:25:23.0: ref_mag=14.81 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.8721 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits at 10:03:32.54 +10:17:51.6: 15.14 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.15 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits at 10:15:56.27 +10:37:14.7: 15.51 +/- 0.29 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:03:32.54 +10:17:51.6: ref_mag=15.15 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.9864 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.43 +/- 0.19
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:15:56.27 +10:37:14.7: ref_mag=15.43 +/- 0.19 new_mean_mag=14.8476 delta=0.58 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54862.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54890.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54909.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54911.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54950.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out55031.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out55051.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 10s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 5s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54824_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 54824_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54827_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 54827_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:45:53.31 +17:04:41.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54828_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 54828_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54831_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 54831_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:39:26.38 +14:13:16.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54836_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 54836_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:41:47.78 +11:28:56.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54838_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 54838_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:09:01.99 +09:34:22.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54844_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 54844_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54845_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 54845_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:16:36.84 +15:00:43.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54848_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 54848_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54849_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 54849_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54850_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 54850_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54851_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 54851_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:20:07.27 +11:30:43.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54852_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 54852_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54853_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 54853_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54854_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 54854_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54856_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 54856_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54857_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 54857_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54859_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 54859_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54861_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 54861_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54862_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
Preparing report for the candidate 54862_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54864_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 54864_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54865_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 54865_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54866_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 54866_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54867_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 54867_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54868_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 54868_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54869_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 54869_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54871_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 54871_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54872_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 54872_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54873_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 54873_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54876_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 54876_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54879_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 54879_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54880_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 54880_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54882_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 54882_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54887_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 54887_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54888_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 54888_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54889_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 54889_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54890_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
Preparing report for the candidate 54890_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54891_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 54891_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54892_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 54892_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54893_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 54893_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54897_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 54897_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54901_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 54901_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54902_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 54902_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54903_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 54903_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54904_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 54904_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54905_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 54905_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54906_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 54906_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54908_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 54908_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54909_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
Preparing report for the candidate 54909_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54910_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 54910_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54911_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
Preparing report for the candidate 54911_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54912_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 54912_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54913_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 54913_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:05:35.52 +15:44:27.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54914_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 54914_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54916_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 54916_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54917_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 54917_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54918_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 54918_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54919_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 54919_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54921_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 54921_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54922_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 54922_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54924_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 54924_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54926_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 54926_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54927_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 54927_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54928_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 54928_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54929_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 54929_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54930_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 54930_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54932_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 54932_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54934_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 54934_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54935_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 54935_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54936_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 54936_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54937_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 54937_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54938_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 54938_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:21:28.10 +18:59:52.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54939_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 54939_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54940_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 54940_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54941_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 54941_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54942_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 54942_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54943_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 54943_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54945_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 54945_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54946_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 54946_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54947_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 54947_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54948_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 54948_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54950_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
Preparing report for the candidate 54950_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54951_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 54951_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54953_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 54953_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54954_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 54954_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:16:16.87 +08:56:15.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54956_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 54956_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54957_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 54957_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:37:43.10 +09:03:32.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54959_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 54959_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54960_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 54960_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:18:59.72 +19:06:24.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54962_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 54962_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54964_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 54964_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54965_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 54965_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54967_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 54967_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54968_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 54968_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54970_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 54970_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54971_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 54971_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54972_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 54972_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54974_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 54974_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54975_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 54975_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54977_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 54977_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54978_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 54978_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54980_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 54980_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54981_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 54981_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54982_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 54982_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:30:19.53 +15:12:28.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54985_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 54985_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54986_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 54986_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54988_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 54988_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:14:58.01 +10:21:00.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54989_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 54989_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54990_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 54990_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54991_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 54991_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54992_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 54992_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54994_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 54994_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54995_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 54995_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54999_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 54999_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55000_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 55000_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55002_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 55002_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55004_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 55004_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55005_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 55005_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55006_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 55006_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55007_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 55007_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55009_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 55009_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55010_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 55010_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55015_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 55015_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:17:08.19 +10:32:43.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55016_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 55016_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55017_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 55017_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55018_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 55018_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55019_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 55019_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55021_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 55021_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55027_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 55027_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55031_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
Preparing report for the candidate 55031_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55032_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 55032_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55036_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 55036_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55037_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 55037_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55042_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 55042_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55043_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 55043_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55048_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 55048_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55050_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 55050_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55051_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
Preparing report for the candidate 55051_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55055_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 55055_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55065_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 55065_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55067_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 55067_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55078_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 55078_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55081_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 55081_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55082_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 55082_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55084_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 55084_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55086_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 55086_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55087_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 55087_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55091_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 55091_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55093_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 55093_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55095_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 55095_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55097_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 55097_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55099_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 55099_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55105_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 55105_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55107_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 55107_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55111_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 55111_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55118_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 55118_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55121_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 55121_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55130_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 55130_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55131_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 55131_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55158_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 55158_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55184_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 55184_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55203_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 55203_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34908_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 34908_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-49-18_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
