This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_222526_TTUQ2b1x1_2427488_tLq5vXQn
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461168.6420,7.22,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260508.1420 7.22CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461168.6420,7.80,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260508.1420 7.80CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461168.6420,7.91,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260508.1420 7.91CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 08.1420 2461168.6420 13.09 07:12:02.41 +22:24:21.1
194.80763 14.33971 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 5.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.17 Thetis -0 1 1 13.4 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:12:02.41 +22:24:21.1: 16.02 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:12:02.41 +22:24:21.1: 15.27 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.27 +/- 0.18
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461168.6420,13.09,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260508.1420 13.09CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 08.1420 2461168.6420 13.60 07:31:22.95 +23:12:58.1
195.84815 18.75879 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 5.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.200 Dynamene 1 1 1 13.9 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:31:22.95 +23:12:58.1: 16.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:31:22.95 +23:12:58.1: 16.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461168.6420,13.60,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260508.1420 13.60CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 08.1420 2461168.6420 13.61 07:26:23.29 +18:02:07.1
200.35507 15.64809 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 5.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.34 Circe 1 2 2 13.9 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:26:23.29 +18:02:07.1: 16.06 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:26:23.29 +18:02:07.1: 16.13 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461168.6420,13.61,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260508.1420 13.61CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 08.1420 2461168.6420 14.02 07:31:13.22 +23:07:57.4
195.91488 18.69267 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.1" and 5.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.133 Cyrene 0 0 1 14.2 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:31:13.22 +23:07:57.4: 15.52 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:31:13.22 +23:07:57.4: 16.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.52 +/- 0.22
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461168.6420,14.02,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260508.1420 14.02CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 08.1420 2461168.6420 14.52 07:30:50.02 +22:25:16.5
196.57271 18.33930 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.1" and 5.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.382 Dodona -0 2 2 14.8 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:30:50.02 +22:25:16.5: 16.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:30:50.02 +22:25:16.5: 16.21 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461168.6420,14.52,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260508.1420 14.52CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 08.1420 2461168.6420 14.69 07:33:58.13 +25:45:30.6
193.57352 20.24638 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 5.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.143 Adria 1 1 1 14.9 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:33:58.13 +25:45:30.6: 16.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:33:58.13 +25:45:30.6: 16.16 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461168.6420,14.69,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260508.1420 14.69CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 08.1420 2461168.6420 14.80 07:36:02.73 +21:19:02.2
198.13812 19.03350 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 5.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.334 Chicago -2 0 2 14.6 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:36:02.73 +21:19:02.2: 16.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:36:02.73 +21:19:02.2: 16.17 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461168.6420,14.80,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260508.1420 14.80CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461168.6420,13.48,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260508.1420 13.48CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.73760365 18.01.2026 05:41:58.955 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
First image: 2461058.73760365 18.01.2026 05:41:58.955 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Last image: 2461168.64229554 08.05.2026 03:24:44.335 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_222526_TTUQ2b1x1_2427488_tLq5vXQn/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 7
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.60
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 10 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 14093
Objects passed selection criteria: 14078
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 14357
Average stars matched: 13185 (91.8367 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 122664 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed May 6 12:14:36 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-43-g0c21e0c3
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu May 7 22:27:28 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.73760365 18.01.2026 05:41:58.955 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
First image: 2461058.73760365 18.01.2026 05:41:58.955 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Last image: 2461168.64229554 08.05.2026 03:24:44.335 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_222526_TTUQ2b1x1_2427488_tLq5vXQn/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 151
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.28
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 107 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 98566
Objects passed selection criteria: 98366
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 101258
Average stars matched: 92806 (91.6535 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1906332 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed May 6 12:14:36 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-43-g0c21e0c3
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu May 7 22:31:19 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_222526_TTUQ2b1x1_2427488_tLq5vXQn/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-23-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_222526_TTUQ2b1x1_2427488_tLq5vXQn/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_222526_TTUQ2b1x1_2427488_tLq5vXQn/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-23-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_222526_TTUQ2b1x1_2427488_tLq5vXQn/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461168.64169485
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits'
wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits'
wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-23-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-23-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-23-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-23-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits'
wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:22:55.118 +21:59:39.20 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-23-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-23-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:15.152 +22:01:14.60 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:22:55.118 +21:59:39.20
Second-epoch image center 07:23:15.152 +22:01:14.60
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0818 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055.fits
Image size: 937.5'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:13.949 +22:01:43.30 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:22:55.118 +21:59:39.20
Second-epoch image center 07:23:13.949 +22:01:43.30
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0805 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:23:15.152 +22:01:14.60
Second-epoch second image center 07:23:13.949 +22:01:43.30
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00923 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Tk1C0aS7av
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits &> /tmp/tmp.FwDSKyMLTD
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_222526_TTUQ2b1x1_2427488_tLq5vXQn/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-23-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits &> /tmp/tmp.fOfCkDSir5
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_222526_TTUQ2b1x1_2427488_tLq5vXQn/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-23-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_222526_TTUQ2b1x1_2427488_tLq5vXQn/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055.fits &> /tmp/tmp.R5YoBEZUnP
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_222526_TTUQ2b1x1_2427488_tLq5vXQn/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 22550 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 101.7556 to 119.3352 deg, Dec +16.3006 to +27.3458 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 101.7556 to 119.3352 deg, Dec 16.3006 to 27.3458 deg
Loaded 14532 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10648 out of 11733 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11733 out of 22550 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.897900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.897900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.60
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.30
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.30
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 22550 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 101.7556 to 119.3352 deg, Dec +16.3006 to +27.3458 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 101.7556 to 119.3352 deg, Dec 16.3006 to 27.3458 deg
Loaded 14532 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10648 out of 11733 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11733 out of 22550 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits (aperture=6.1)
Read 23656 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 102.0351 to 119.5904 deg, Dec +16.4807 to +27.2946 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 102.0351 to 119.5904 deg, Dec 16.4807 to 27.2946 deg
Loaded 13969 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10670 out of 11761 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11761 out of 23656 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 6 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
2.3 pix Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
2.5 pix fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-23-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits
2.5 pix fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
15.3 mag. Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
14.9 mag. fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-23-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits
14.9 mag. fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.9 (SNR ) 12.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.Tk1C0aS7av (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-07_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_222526_TTUQ2b1x1_2427488_tLq5vXQn/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2218, passed=22550
Got 22550 stars (including 20300 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 22550 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 954 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 941 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22225 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 954 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22223 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22223 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 953 stars left (next iteration limit 1048)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits -region wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.FwDSKyMLTD (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-07_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_222526_TTUQ2b1x1_2427488_tLq5vXQn/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2265, passed=23656
Got 23656 stars (including 21362 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 23656 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 951 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 930 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22858 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 952 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22858 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22858 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 949 stars left (next iteration limit 1045)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits -region wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.fOfCkDSir5 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-07_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_222526_TTUQ2b1x1_2427488_tLq5vXQn/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_222526_TTUQ2b1x1_2427488_tLq5vXQn/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-23-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_222526_TTUQ2b1x1_2427488_tLq5vXQn/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-23-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_222526_TTUQ2b1x1_2427488_tLq5vXQn/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-23-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_222526_TTUQ2b1x1_2427488_tLq5vXQn/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-23-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_222526_TTUQ2b1x1_2427488_tLq5vXQn/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-23-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_222526_TTUQ2b1x1_2427488_tLq5vXQn/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-23-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-23-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-23-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-23-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-23-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-23-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-23-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-23-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_222526_TTUQ2b1x1_2427488_tLq5vXQn/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-23-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-23-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1156, passed=16725
Got 16725 stars (including 15555 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-23-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 16725 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 938 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 924 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16525 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 938 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16524 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16524 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.65"
Excluding outliers - 937 stars left (next iteration limit 1030)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-23-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-23-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_222526_TTUQ2b1x1_2427488_tLq5vXQn/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-23-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-23-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-23-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.R5YoBEZUnP (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-07_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_222526_TTUQ2b1x1_2427488_tLq5vXQn/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_222526_TTUQ2b1x1_2427488_tLq5vXQn/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_222526_TTUQ2b1x1_2427488_tLq5vXQn/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_222526_TTUQ2b1x1_2427488_tLq5vXQn/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_222526_TTUQ2b1x1_2427488_tLq5vXQn/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_222526_TTUQ2b1x1_2427488_tLq5vXQn/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_222526_TTUQ2b1x1_2427488_tLq5vXQn/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_222526_TTUQ2b1x1_2427488_tLq5vXQn/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=5, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1153, passed=16682
Got 16682 stars (including 15518 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 16682 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 923 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16465 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16465 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16465 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.66"
Excluding outliers - 936 stars left (next iteration limit 1031)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_222526_TTUQ2b1x1_2427488_tLq5vXQn/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-23-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-23-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_222526_TTUQ2b1x1_2427488_tLq5vXQn/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-23-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_222526_TTUQ2b1x1_2427488_tLq5vXQn/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:07:33.25 +21:20:40.4: 12.22 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:05:57.37 +22:56:38.7: 12.34 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:05:57.37 +22:56:38.7: 9.01 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:07:33.25 +21:20:40.4: 12.21 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.34 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:05:57.37 +22:56:38.7: ref_mag=12.34 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3226 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.21 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:07:33.25 +21:20:40.4: ref_mag=12.21 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2955 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 3s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34568_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055
The candidate 34568_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:13:11.44 +24:00:00.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34570_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055
The candidate 34570_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:40:58.45 +21:47:48.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34571_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055
Preparing report for the candidate 34571_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34634_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055
The candidate 34634_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34638_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055
The candidate 34638_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30957_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055
The candidate 30957_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:43:02.36 +23:26:56.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 5s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Gem-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_222526_TTUQ2b1x1_2427488_tLq5vXQn/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-23-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_222526_TTUQ2b1x1_2427488_tLq5vXQn/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_222526_TTUQ2b1x1_2427488_tLq5vXQn/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-23-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_222526_TTUQ2b1x1_2427488_tLq5vXQn/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-23-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-23-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:22:55.118 +21:59:39.20 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-23-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-23-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:15.152 +22:01:14.60 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:22:55.118 +21:59:39.20
Second-epoch image center 07:23:15.152 +22:01:14.60
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0818 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055.fits
Image size: 937.5'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:13.949 +22:01:43.30 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:22:55.118 +21:59:39.20
Second-epoch image center 07:23:13.949 +22:01:43.30
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0805 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:23:15.152 +22:01:14.60
Second-epoch second image center 07:23:13.949 +22:01:43.30
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00923 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits &> /tmp/tmp.VKVZ5d4UbN
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits &> /tmp/tmp.jQqMhS1fy4
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_222526_TTUQ2b1x1_2427488_tLq5vXQn/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-23-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Ym24Cqjh06
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_222526_TTUQ2b1x1_2427488_tLq5vXQn/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-23-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_222526_TTUQ2b1x1_2427488_tLq5vXQn/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055.fits &> /tmp/tmp.93tEExcqKB
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_222526_TTUQ2b1x1_2427488_tLq5vXQn/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 153680 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 101.7461 to 119.3352 deg, Dec +16.3007 to +27.3487 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 101.7461 to 119.3352 deg, Dec 16.3007 to 27.3487 deg
Loaded 14554 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8811 out of 12036 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12036 out of 153680 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.757100
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.757100
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.28
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.48
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.48
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 153680 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 101.7461 to 119.3352 deg, Dec +16.3007 to +27.3487 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 101.7461 to 119.3352 deg, Dec 16.3007 to 27.3487 deg
Loaded 14554 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8811 out of 12036 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12036 out of 153680 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits (aperture=4.6)
Read 151496 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 102.0337 to 119.6237 deg, Dec +16.4751 to +27.2973 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 102.0337 to 119.6237 deg, Dec 16.4751 to 27.2973 deg
Loaded 14001 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8799 out of 12010 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12010 out of 151496 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits (aperture=4.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 129 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
2.1 pix Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
2.3 pix fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-23-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits
2.3 pix fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055.fits
1.9 pix wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
15.5 mag. Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
15.1 mag. fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-23-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits
15.1 mag. fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.1 (SNR ) 14.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.VKVZ5d4UbN (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-07_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_222526_TTUQ2b1x1_2427488_tLq5vXQn/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=36, blended=17863, passed=153644
Got 153644 stars (including 135507 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 153644 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 941 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 151041 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 151042 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 151042 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 953 stars left (next iteration limit 1048)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits -region wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.jQqMhS1fy4 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-07_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_222526_TTUQ2b1x1_2427488_tLq5vXQn/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=23, blended=17705, passed=151473
Got 151473 stars (including 133510 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 151473 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 954 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 937 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 148383 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 954 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 148381 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 148382 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 953 stars left (next iteration limit 1049)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits -region wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Ym24Cqjh06 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-07_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_222526_TTUQ2b1x1_2427488_tLq5vXQn/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_222526_TTUQ2b1x1_2427488_tLq5vXQn/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-23-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_222526_TTUQ2b1x1_2427488_tLq5vXQn/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-23-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_222526_TTUQ2b1x1_2427488_tLq5vXQn/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-23-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_222526_TTUQ2b1x1_2427488_tLq5vXQn/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-23-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_222526_TTUQ2b1x1_2427488_tLq5vXQn/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-23-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_222526_TTUQ2b1x1_2427488_tLq5vXQn/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-23-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-23-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-23-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-23-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-23-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-23-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-23-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-23-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_222526_TTUQ2b1x1_2427488_tLq5vXQn/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-23-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-23-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=33, blended=9088, passed=103975
Got 103975 stars (including 94776 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-23-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 103975 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 921 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 102290 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 102292 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 102291 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Excluding outliers - 941 stars left (next iteration limit 1036)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-23-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-23-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_222526_TTUQ2b1x1_2427488_tLq5vXQn/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-23-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-23-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-23-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.93tEExcqKB (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-07_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_222526_TTUQ2b1x1_2427488_tLq5vXQn/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_222526_TTUQ2b1x1_2427488_tLq5vXQn/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_222526_TTUQ2b1x1_2427488_tLq5vXQn/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_222526_TTUQ2b1x1_2427488_tLq5vXQn/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_222526_TTUQ2b1x1_2427488_tLq5vXQn/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_222526_TTUQ2b1x1_2427488_tLq5vXQn/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_222526_TTUQ2b1x1_2427488_tLq5vXQn/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_222526_TTUQ2b1x1_2427488_tLq5vXQn/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=3, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=31, blended=9198, passed=103776
Got 103776 stars (including 94478 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 103776 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 922 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 101891 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 101892 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 101893 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Excluding outliers - 945 stars left (next iteration limit 1039)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_222526_TTUQ2b1x1_2427488_tLq5vXQn/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-23-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_222526_TTUQ2b1x1_2427488_tLq5vXQn/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-23-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_222526_TTUQ2b1x1_2427488_tLq5vXQn/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:24:47.18 +20:17:27.2: 14.44 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:24:07.74 +20:44:52.3: 14.30 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:18:58.84 +21:31:30.8: 14.37 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:10:47.79 +24:40:43.5: 14.65 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:32:10.08 +18:48:53.3: 14.70 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:31:01.67 +20:59:09.6: 14.73 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:40:21.50 +23:49:16.9: 14.28 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:24:47.18 +20:17:27.2: 14.61 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:24:07.74 +20:44:52.3: 14.39 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:22:00.93 +24:21:45.5: 14.76 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.34 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.52 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:24:07.74 +20:44:52.3: ref_mag=14.34 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.6553 delta=-0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:24:47.18 +20:17:27.2: ref_mag=14.52 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.5848 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:32:10.08 +18:48:53.3: 14.73 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:18:58.84 +21:31:30.8: 14.46 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.72 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:32:10.08 +18:48:53.3: ref_mag=14.72 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.6945 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.41 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:18:58.84 +21:31:30.8: ref_mag=14.41 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.5497 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:10:47.79 +24:40:43.5: 14.75 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.69 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:10:47.79 +24:40:43.5: ref_mag=14.69 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.8702 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:31:01.67 +20:59:09.6: 14.63 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.67 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:31:01.67 +20:59:09.6: ref_mag=14.67 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.8260 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:41:26.96 +25:08:13.5: 14.41 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:22:00.93 +24:21:45.5: 14.82 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.79 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:22:00.93 +24:21:45.5: ref_mag=14.79 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.8961 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:38:55.79 +18:18:01.7: 14.80 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:40:21.50 +23:49:16.9: 14.28 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.28 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:40:21.50 +23:49:16.9: ref_mag=14.28 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.6592 delta=-0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:41:26.96 +25:08:13.5: 14.54 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.47 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:41:26.96 +25:08:13.5: ref_mag=14.47 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.6044 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:38:55.79 +18:18:01.7: 14.62 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.69 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:38:55.79 +18:18:01.7: ref_mag=14.69 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.5276 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:21:22.21 +19:43:07.9: 14.39 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:40:08.87 +22:08:36.8: 13.93 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:29:28.41 +20:03:03.8: 14.21 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:22:31.90 +23:54:44.1: 14.34 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:21:22.21 +19:43:07.9: 14.35 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:40:08.87 +22:08:36.8: 14.02 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:22:31.90 +23:54:44.1: 14.06 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.98 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:40:08.87 +22:08:36.8: ref_mag=13.98 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.1610 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.37 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.16 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:21:22.21 +19:43:07.9: ref_mag=14.37 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.5220 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:39:39.09 +22:41:48.4: 13.68 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:22:31.90 +23:54:44.1: ref_mag=14.16 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.5179 delta=-0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:29:28.41 +20:03:03.8: 14.20 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.20 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:29:28.41 +20:03:03.8: ref_mag=14.20 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.3143 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:39:39.09 +22:41:48.4: 13.81 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.75 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:39:39.09 +22:41:48.4: ref_mag=13.75 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.1778 delta=-0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:13:01.26 +20:29:31.0: 13.92 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:29:40.91 +22:30:06.5: 13.62 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:14:13.15 +23:10:38.2: 13.43 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:23:44.10 +25:47:48.3: 13.86 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:13:01.26 +20:29:31.0: 13.98 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:29:40.91 +22:30:06.5: 13.88 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.95 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:13:01.26 +20:29:31.0: ref_mag=13.95 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.1914 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.73 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:29:40.91 +22:30:06.5: ref_mag=13.73 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.1726 delta=-0.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:23:44.10 +25:47:48.3: 13.89 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.88 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:23:44.10 +25:47:48.3: ref_mag=13.88 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8592 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:14:13.15 +23:10:38.2: 13.41 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.42 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:14:13.15 +23:10:38.2: ref_mag=13.42 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.6397 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:41:56.82 +22:06:51.4: 12.60 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:41:56.82 +22:06:51.4: 12.69 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.64 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:41:56.82 +22:06:51.4: ref_mag=12.64 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.9876 delta=-0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:12:02.41 +22:24:21.1: 16.02 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:12:02.41 +22:24:21.1: 15.27 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.27 +/- 0.18
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 07:12:02.41 +22:24:21.1: ref_mag=15.27 +/- 0.18 new_mean_mag=13.0890 delta=2.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:37:13.45 +17:46:51.5: 13.40 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:31:22.95 +23:12:58.1: 16.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:37:13.45 +17:46:51.5: 13.45 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.43 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:37:13.45 +17:46:51.5: ref_mag=13.43 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5165 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:31:22.95 +23:12:58.1: 16.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:26:23.29 +18:02:07.1: 16.06 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:32:11.28 +23:57:10.0: 13.45 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:26:23.29 +18:02:07.1: 16.13 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:32:11.28 +23:57:10.0: 13.30 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.36 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:32:11.28 +23:57:10.0: ref_mag=13.36 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.6889 delta=-0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:31:27.89 +24:22:24.9: 13.61 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:31:27.89 +24:22:24.9: 13.32 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:19:40.15 +21:05:54.4: 13.56 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.44 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:31:27.89 +24:22:24.9: ref_mag=13.44 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.7339 delta=-0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:15:38.41 +19:51:30.4: 13.94 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:17:28.44 +23:06:50.9: 13.80 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:15:38.41 +19:51:30.4: 13.95 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.94 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:15:38.41 +19:51:30.4: ref_mag=13.94 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8842 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:17:28.44 +23:06:50.9: 13.92 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.86 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:17:28.44 +23:06:50.9: ref_mag=13.86 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8792 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:19:40.15 +21:05:54.4: 13.74 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.63 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:19:40.15 +21:05:54.4: ref_mag=13.63 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8728 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:13:12.07 +26:11:51.1: 13.94 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:18:39.11 +25:35:48.0: 13.86 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:13:12.07 +26:11:51.1: 13.83 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.88 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:13:12.07 +26:11:51.1: ref_mag=13.88 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.9663 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:18:39.11 +25:35:48.0: 14.05 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.94 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:18:39.11 +25:35:48.0: ref_mag=13.94 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0279 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:38:24.41 +21:35:17.9: 14.35 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:24:22.00 +25:44:36.2: 13.84 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:31:13.22 +23:07:57.4: 15.52 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:18:59.97 +20:18:51.3: 14.08 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:38:24.41 +21:35:17.9: 14.31 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:24:22.00 +25:44:36.2: 13.83 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.33 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:38:24.41 +21:35:17.9: ref_mag=14.33 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.0805 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.84 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:24:22.00 +25:44:36.2: ref_mag=13.84 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.9152 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:31:13.22 +23:07:57.4: 16.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:18:59.97 +20:18:51.3: 14.27 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.52 +/- 0.22
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.16 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 07:31:13.22 +23:07:57.4: ref_mag=15.52 +/- 0.22 new_mean_mag=14.0155 delta=1.50 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:18:59.97 +20:18:51.3: ref_mag=14.16 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.0818 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:18:25.74 +21:22:43.5: 13.92 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:39:25.60 +21:29:26.1: 14.24 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:38:42.26 +20:50:44.2: 14.13 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:18:25.74 +21:22:43.5: 14.23 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:39:25.60 +21:29:26.1: 13.97 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.02 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:18:25.74 +21:22:43.5: ref_mag=14.02 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0890 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.06 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:39:25.60 +21:29:26.1: ref_mag=14.06 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.1404 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:38:42.26 +20:50:44.2: 14.16 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.14 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:38:42.26 +20:50:44.2: ref_mag=14.14 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.1355 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:30:10.13 +22:10:50.4: 13.82 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:30:10.13 +22:10:50.4: 14.02 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.90 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:30:10.13 +22:10:50.4: ref_mag=13.90 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.1117 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:37:53.89 +23:39:41.6: 13.94 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:20:07.55 +18:26:10.3: 14.40 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:31:51.87 +22:09:03.1: 14.34 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:37:53.89 +23:39:41.6: 14.18 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.05 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:37:53.89 +23:39:41.6: ref_mag=14.05 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.2322 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:20:07.55 +18:26:10.3: 13.92 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.06 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:20:07.55 +18:26:10.3: ref_mag=14.06 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.3272 delta=-0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:24:17.90 +19:30:44.3: 14.08 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:31:51.87 +22:09:03.1: 14.32 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.33 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:31:51.87 +22:09:03.1: ref_mag=14.33 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.4193 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:24:17.90 +19:30:44.3: 14.46 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:31:13.35 +21:02:57.7: 14.41 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.20 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:24:17.90 +19:30:44.3: ref_mag=14.20 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.4409 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:11:53.60 +22:36:40.6: 14.54 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:30:50.02 +22:25:16.5: 16.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:31:13.35 +21:02:57.7: 14.40 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.41 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:31:13.35 +21:02:57.7: ref_mag=14.41 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.3465 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:11:53.60 +22:36:40.6: 14.36 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.44 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:11:53.60 +22:36:40.6: ref_mag=14.44 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.5336 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:26:03.58 +24:24:06.1: 14.31 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:30:50.02 +22:25:16.5: 16.21 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:08:57.31 +21:45:05.4: 14.21 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:33:58.13 +25:45:30.6: 16.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:26:03.58 +24:24:06.1: 14.28 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.29 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:26:03.58 +24:24:06.1: ref_mag=14.29 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.6040 delta=-0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:28:32.11 +25:06:52.3: 14.45 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:36:02.73 +21:19:02.2: 16.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:08:57.31 +21:45:05.4: 14.35 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:33:58.13 +25:45:30.6: 16.16 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.26 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:08:57.31 +21:45:05.4: ref_mag=14.26 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.5687 delta=-0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:15:11.39 +23:11:38.7: 15.03 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:28:32.11 +25:06:52.3: 14.46 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:23:14.86 +18:41:34.4: 16.08 +/- 0.36 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:36:02.73 +21:19:02.2: 16.17 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.45 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:22:29.75 +25:58:53.2: 14.70 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:28:32.11 +25:06:52.3: ref_mag=14.45 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.4668 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:15:11.39 +23:11:38.7: 15.17 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.09 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:15:11.39 +23:11:38.7: ref_mag=15.09 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.8548 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:22:29.75 +25:58:53.2: 14.83 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.75 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:22:29.75 +25:58:53.2: ref_mag=14.75 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.7653 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:23:14.86 +18:41:34.4: 15.59 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.74 +/- 0.20
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 07:23:14.86 +18:41:34.4: ref_mag=15.74 +/- 0.20 new_mean_mag=14.7349 delta=1.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:25:25.32 +25:13:00.9: 15.01 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:25:25.32 +25:13:00.9: 15.22 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.10 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:25:25.32 +25:13:00.9: ref_mag=15.10 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.8993 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:19:04.09 +20:43:41.1: 14.57 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:16:18.62 +22:58:41.6: 15.37 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:19:04.09 +20:43:41.1: 14.54 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.56 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:19:04.09 +20:43:41.1: ref_mag=14.56 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.8200 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:16:18.62 +22:58:41.6: 15.51 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.43 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:16:18.62 +22:58:41.6: ref_mag=15.43 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.9301 delta=0.50 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:12:13.09 +19:47:50.0: 14.83 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:11:49.23 +23:18:33.2: 15.22 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:30:44.74 +21:28:23.6: 15.00 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:12:13.09 +19:47:50.0: 14.52 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.62 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:12:13.09 +19:47:50.0: ref_mag=14.62 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.7444 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:11:49.23 +23:18:33.2: 15.43 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:19:28.21 +23:53:17.5: 14.58 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:30:44.74 +21:28:23.6: 15.12 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.30 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:11:49.23 +23:18:33.2: ref_mag=15.30 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.7028 delta=0.60 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.05 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:30:44.74 +21:28:23.6: ref_mag=15.05 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.9742 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:09:32.24 +19:54:33.6: 15.03 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:19:28.21 +23:53:17.5: 14.76 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.66 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:19:28.21 +23:53:17.5: ref_mag=14.66 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.7595 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:18:58.58 +25:55:18.7: 14.83 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:09:32.24 +19:54:33.6: 14.93 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.97 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:09:32.24 +19:54:33.6: ref_mag=14.97 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.9085 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:18:58.58 +25:55:18.7: 14.75 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.78 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:18:58.58 +25:55:18.7: ref_mag=14.78 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.7443 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out196338.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out195725.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out195796.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out195822.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out195947.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out196256.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out196291.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out196330.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 40s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 11s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195476_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055
The candidate 195476_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195478_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055
The candidate 195478_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195480_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055
The candidate 195480_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195482_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055
The candidate 195482_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:25:27.97 +22:46:00.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195486_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055
The candidate 195486_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195494_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055
The candidate 195494_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195496_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055
The candidate 195496_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:20:57.20 +25:04:52.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195497_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055
The candidate 195497_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195499_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055
The candidate 195499_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195501_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055
The candidate 195501_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195506_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055
The candidate 195506_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195508_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055
The candidate 195508_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195509_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055
The candidate 195509_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195510_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055
The candidate 195510_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195530_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055
The candidate 195530_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195533_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055
The candidate 195533_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195536_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055
The candidate 195536_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:22.20 +21:31:48.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195537_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055
The candidate 195537_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195538_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055
The candidate 195538_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195541_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055
The candidate 195541_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195546_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055
The candidate 195546_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195561_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055
The candidate 195561_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195563_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055
The candidate 195563_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:08:20.97 +18:46:52.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195564_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055
The candidate 195564_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195569_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055
The candidate 195569_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:25:22.46 +24:00:03.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195574_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055
The candidate 195574_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195576_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055
The candidate 195576_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:32.97 +24:41:32.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195577_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055
The candidate 195577_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:00.11 +19:41:41.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195582_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055
Preparing report for the candidate 195582_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195583_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055
Preparing report for the candidate 195583_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195640_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055
The candidate 195640_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:19.20 +24:07:16.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195649_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055
The candidate 195649_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:25.15 +22:38:51.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195679_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055
The candidate 195679_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:25.38 +25:56:21.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195693_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055
The candidate 195693_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:32:08.79 +23:56:52.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195709_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055
The candidate 195709_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:11:55.64 +22:17:43.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195724_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055
The candidate 195724_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:15.34 +21:47:43.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195725_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055
Preparing report for the candidate 195725_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195731_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055
The candidate 195731_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:55.42 +21:31:10.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195732_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055
The candidate 195732_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:50.87 +18:51:19.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195737_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055
The candidate 195737_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:31:54.33 +24:32:04.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195763_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055
The candidate 195763_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:20:30.43 +20:05:40.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195764_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055
The candidate 195764_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:14:40.66 +20:31:58.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195772_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055
The candidate 195772_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195790_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055
The candidate 195790_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:41:33.13 +18:14:37.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195796_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055
Preparing report for the candidate 195796_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195805_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055
The candidate 195805_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:51.70 +20:05:38.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195806_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055
The candidate 195806_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:27.69 +22:58:44.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195809_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055
The candidate 195809_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:11.04 +20:06:30.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195817_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055
The candidate 195817_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:22:13.54 +22:40:19.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195818_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055
The candidate 195818_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:27:24.58 +19:09:59.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195822_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055
Preparing report for the candidate 195822_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195830_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055
The candidate 195830_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:27:03.71 +20:16:03.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195831_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055
The candidate 195831_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195832_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055
The candidate 195832_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:11:33.56 +22:39:40.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195835_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055
The candidate 195835_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:19:55.78 +20:49:18.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195845_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055
The candidate 195845_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:10:22.66 +20:00:49.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195847_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055
The candidate 195847_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:24:29.36 +18:53:46.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195850_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055
The candidate 195850_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:22.89 +18:10:09.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195856_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055
The candidate 195856_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:40.69 +21:21:31.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195858_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055
The candidate 195858_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:10:01.71 +21:28:00.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195863_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055
The candidate 195863_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:38:26.47 +21:32:36.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195867_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055
The candidate 195867_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:15.62 +25:49:12.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195881_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055
The candidate 195881_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:31:02.55 +25:10:29.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195885_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055
The candidate 195885_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195889_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055
The candidate 195889_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195900_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055
The candidate 195900_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195912_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055
The candidate 195912_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195924_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055
The candidate 195924_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:30:28.06 +25:27:45.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195929_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055
The candidate 195929_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195933_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055
The candidate 195933_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195934_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055
The candidate 195934_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:25:32.33 +20:28:38.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195942_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055
The candidate 195942_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:14:39.50 +25:20:32.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195947_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055
Preparing report for the candidate 195947_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195953_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055
The candidate 195953_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195955_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055
The candidate 195955_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195960_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055
The candidate 195960_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:20:30.15 +22:26:09.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195965_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055
The candidate 195965_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195971_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055
The candidate 195971_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:08:42.74 +20:49:20.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195977_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055
The candidate 195977_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:14.34 +19:32:12.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195987_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055
The candidate 195987_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:15:18.05 +18:00:29.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195996_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055
The candidate 195996_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:29:33.76 +23:02:48.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195997_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055
The candidate 195997_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:18:22.82 +17:52:05.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196000_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055
The candidate 196000_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196002_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055
The candidate 196002_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196008_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055
The candidate 196008_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:11:39.77 +20:41:33.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196011_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055
The candidate 196011_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196028_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055
The candidate 196028_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196034_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055
The candidate 196034_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:08:29.51 +21:58:29.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196046_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055
The candidate 196046_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:15:56.92 +22:00:59.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196048_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055
The candidate 196048_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:22.33 +21:13:56.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196082_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055
The candidate 196082_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:37:00.62 +25:44:57.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196097_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055
The candidate 196097_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:14:11.55 +24:02:04.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196098_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055
The candidate 196098_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:24.31 +24:47:36.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196100_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055
The candidate 196100_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:04.46 +23:31:31.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196103_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055
The candidate 196103_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:11:01.42 +18:18:03.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196133_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055
The candidate 196133_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:10:34.99 +22:10:30.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196134_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055
The candidate 196134_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:11:24.34 +21:11:36.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196143_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055
The candidate 196143_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196146_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055
The candidate 196146_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:56.04 +21:35:31.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196172_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055
The candidate 196172_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196182_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055
The candidate 196182_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196193_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055
The candidate 196193_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:29:46.29 +20:58:15.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196210_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055
The candidate 196210_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:15:08.09 +21:35:23.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196234_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055
The candidate 196234_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196236_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055
The candidate 196236_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:22:05.57 +19:15:45.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196242_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055
The candidate 196242_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196255_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055
The candidate 196255_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196256_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055
Preparing report for the candidate 196256_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196281_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055
The candidate 196281_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196284_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055
The candidate 196284_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196291_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055
Preparing report for the candidate 196291_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196297_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055
The candidate 196297_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:14:09.69 +26:03:01.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196309_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055
The candidate 196309_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196330_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055
Preparing report for the candidate 196330_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196333_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055
The candidate 196333_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196338_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055
The candidate 196338_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:23:14.86 +18:41:34.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.73, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.71)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.494 3362573983880111744 110.81192315035 +18.69275178418 15.3005 14.8213 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.494#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196347_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055
The candidate 196347_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196360_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055
The candidate 196360_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196363_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055
The candidate 196363_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196387_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055
The candidate 196387_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196390_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055
The candidate 196390_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196402_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055
The candidate 196402_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196413_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055
The candidate 196413_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196414_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055
The candidate 196414_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196415_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055
The candidate 196415_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196467_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055
The candidate 196467_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196473_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055
The candidate 196473_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 165521_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055
The candidate 165521_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_22-24-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0055 did not pass the final checks
