This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_052337_TTUQ2b1x1_2233110_ryP0jG0F
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 07.4238 2461167.9238 11.97 16:11:56.63 -13:44:15.5
359.33171 26.48475 galactic Sco Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 9.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.346 Hermentaria 1 -1 2 11.7 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:11:56.63 -13:44:15.5: 15.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:11:56.63 -13:44:15.5: 15.22 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461167.9238,11.97,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260507.4238 11.97CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 07.4238 2461167.9238 12.92 16:13:46.68 -08:28:52.1
4.27412 29.44926 galactic Sco Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 9.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.559 Nanon 2 -0 2 13.1 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:13:46.68 -08:28:52.1: 15.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:13:46.68 -08:28:52.1: 15.34 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461167.9238,12.92,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260507.4238 12.92CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 07.4238 2461167.9238 13.29 16:03:27.12 -13:43:12.2
357.82893 28.05617 galactic Sco Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 9.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.563 Suleika 1 -0 1 13.3 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:03:27.12 -13:43:12.2: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:03:27.12 -13:43:12.2: 15.19 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461167.9238,13.29,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260507.4238 13.29CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 07.4238 2461167.9238 14.55 16:03:29.46 -10:14:24.9
0.85721 30.31930 galactic Sco Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.5" and 9.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1391 Carelia 2 -1 2 14.6 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:03:29.46 -10:14:24.9: 15.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:03:29.46 -10:14:24.9: 15.34 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461167.9238,14.55,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260507.4238 14.55CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461098.97005181 27.02.2026 11:16:42.476 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
First image: 2461098.97005181 27.02.2026 11:16:42.476 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
Last image: 2461167.92410230 07.05.2026 10:10:32.439 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_052337_TTUQ2b1x1_2233110_ryP0jG0F/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0101.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 1
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.82
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 5295
Objects passed selection criteria: 5282
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 4510.75
Average stars matched: 4250 (94.2194 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 111744 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed May 6 12:14:36 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-43-g0c21e0c3
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu May 7 05:29:42 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461098.97005181 27.02.2026 11:16:42.476 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
First image: 2461098.97005181 27.02.2026 11:16:42.476 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
Last image: 2461167.92410230 07.05.2026 10:10:32.439 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_052337_TTUQ2b1x1_2233110_ryP0jG0F/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0101.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 44
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.50
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 18 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 44024
Objects passed selection criteria: 43933
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 38456.5
Average stars matched: 36163.5 (94.0374 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 147296 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed May 6 12:14:36 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-43-g0c21e0c3
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu May 7 05:31:43 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_052337_TTUQ2b1x1_2233110_ryP0jG0F/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-09-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_052337_TTUQ2b1x1_2233110_ryP0jG0F/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0101.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_052337_TTUQ2b1x1_2233110_ryP0jG0F/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-09-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_052337_TTUQ2b1x1_2233110_ryP0jG0F/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0101.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461167.92348729
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits'
wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits'
wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-09-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-09-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-09-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-09-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits'
wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0101.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0101.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0101.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0101.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:17:09.052 -09:59:57.66 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-09-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-09-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:17:10.895 -10:00:29.23 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:17:09.052 -09:59:57.66
Second-epoch image center 16:17:10.895 -10:00:29.23
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0116 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0101.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0101.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:17:14.111 -10:00:59.99 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:17:09.052 -09:59:57.66
Second-epoch image center 16:17:14.111 -10:00:59.99
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0270 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 16:17:10.895 -10:00:29.23
Second-epoch second image center 16:17:14.111 -10:00:59.99
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01572 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits &> /tmp/tmp.K2dvdqVbBA
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits &> /tmp/tmp.XzuEL0FbTR
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_052337_TTUQ2b1x1_2233110_ryP0jG0F/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-09-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits &> /tmp/tmp.SlwCx5UU3u
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_052337_TTUQ2b1x1_2233110_ryP0jG0F/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-09-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_052337_TTUQ2b1x1_2233110_ryP0jG0F/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0101.fits &> /tmp/tmp.XPTTaXBY5Y
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_052337_TTUQ2b1x1_2233110_ryP0jG0F/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0101.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits and wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits and wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits and wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 7722 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 236.1744 to 252.3750 deg, Dec -15.2624 to -4.6754 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 236.1744 to 252.3750 deg, Dec -15.2624 to -4.6754 deg
Loaded 4809 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3998 out of 4171 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4171 out of 7722 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.905700
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.905700
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.82
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.09
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.09
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 7722 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 236.1744 to 252.3750 deg, Dec -15.2624 to -4.6754 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 236.1744 to 252.3750 deg, Dec -15.2624 to -4.6754 deg
Loaded 4809 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3998 out of 4171 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4171 out of 7722 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits (aperture=5.6)
Read 5066 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 236.2082 to 252.3187 deg, Dec -15.2481 to -4.6756 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 236.2082 to 252.3187 deg, Dec -15.2481 to -4.6756 deg
Loaded 4791 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3538 out of 3621 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3621 out of 5066 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits (aperture=6.4)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 1 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
2.4 pix Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits
2.3 pix fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-09-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits
2.3 pix fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0101.fits
2.0 pix wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
2.4 pix wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.1 mag. Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
14.5 mag. Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits
14.5 mag. fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-09-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits
14.5 mag. fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0101.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.5 (SNR ) 11.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.K2dvdqVbBA (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-07_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_052337_TTUQ2b1x1_2233110_ryP0jG0F/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits' -> 'wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=3, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=451, passed=7719
Got 7719 stars (including 7254 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7719 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 952 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7517 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7518 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7518 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 968 stars left (next iteration limit 1064)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits -region wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.XzuEL0FbTR (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-07_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_052337_TTUQ2b1x1_2233110_ryP0jG0F/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits' -> 'wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=289, passed=5066
Got 5066 stars (including 4773 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5066 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013028 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010422 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.2 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 958 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4961 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.2 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4959 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4959 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Excluding outliers - 968 stars left (next iteration limit 1064)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits -region wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.SlwCx5UU3u (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-07_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_052337_TTUQ2b1x1_2233110_ryP0jG0F/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_052337_TTUQ2b1x1_2233110_ryP0jG0F/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-09-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_052337_TTUQ2b1x1_2233110_ryP0jG0F/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-09-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_052337_TTUQ2b1x1_2233110_ryP0jG0F/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-09-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_052337_TTUQ2b1x1_2233110_ryP0jG0F/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-09-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_052337_TTUQ2b1x1_2233110_ryP0jG0F/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-09-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_052337_TTUQ2b1x1_2233110_ryP0jG0F/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-09-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-09-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-09-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-09-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-09-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-09-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-09-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-09-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_052337_TTUQ2b1x1_2233110_ryP0jG0F/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-09-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-09-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=306, passed=5192
Got 5192 stars (including 4880 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-09-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5192 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 952 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5059 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5059 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5059 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Excluding outliers - 968 stars left (next iteration limit 1064)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-09-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-09-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_052337_TTUQ2b1x1_2233110_ryP0jG0F/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-09-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits -region wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-09-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-09-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.XPTTaXBY5Y (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-07_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_052337_TTUQ2b1x1_2233110_ryP0jG0F/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_052337_TTUQ2b1x1_2233110_ryP0jG0F/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0101.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_052337_TTUQ2b1x1_2233110_ryP0jG0F/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0101.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_052337_TTUQ2b1x1_2233110_ryP0jG0F/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0101.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_052337_TTUQ2b1x1_2233110_ryP0jG0F/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0101.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_052337_TTUQ2b1x1_2233110_ryP0jG0F/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0101.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_052337_TTUQ2b1x1_2233110_ryP0jG0F/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0101.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0101.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0101.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0101.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0101.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0101.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0101.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0101.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_052337_TTUQ2b1x1_2233110_ryP0jG0F/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0101.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0101.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=312, passed=5271
Got 5271 stars (including 4955 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0101.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5271 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 949 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5139 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5142 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5142 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Excluding outliers - 967 stars left (next iteration limit 1063)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0101.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0101.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_052337_TTUQ2b1x1_2233110_ryP0jG0F/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0101.fits -region wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0101.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0101.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-09-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-09-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_052337_TTUQ2b1x1_2233110_ryP0jG0F/wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-09-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0101.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0101.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_052337_TTUQ2b1x1_2233110_ryP0jG0F/wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0101.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sco-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20489_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0101
The candidate 20489_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0101 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:21:24.43 -07:42:02.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 0s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Sco-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_052337_TTUQ2b1x1_2233110_ryP0jG0F/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-09-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_052337_TTUQ2b1x1_2233110_ryP0jG0F/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0101.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_052337_TTUQ2b1x1_2233110_ryP0jG0F/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-09-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_052337_TTUQ2b1x1_2233110_ryP0jG0F/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0101.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-09-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0101.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-09-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0101.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:17:09.052 -09:59:57.66 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-09-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-09-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:17:10.895 -10:00:29.23 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:17:09.052 -09:59:57.66
Second-epoch image center 16:17:10.895 -10:00:29.23
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0116 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0101.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0101.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:17:14.111 -10:00:59.99 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:17:09.052 -09:59:57.66
Second-epoch image center 16:17:14.111 -10:00:59.99
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0270 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 16:17:10.895 -10:00:29.23
Second-epoch second image center 16:17:14.111 -10:00:59.99
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01572 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits &> /tmp/tmp.TZkkjpYOyL
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Fub1EY1vEw
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_052337_TTUQ2b1x1_2233110_ryP0jG0F/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-09-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ng0mRKwzO4
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_052337_TTUQ2b1x1_2233110_ryP0jG0F/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-09-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_052337_TTUQ2b1x1_2233110_ryP0jG0F/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0101.fits &> /tmp/tmp.OVUEzLXTjJ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_052337_TTUQ2b1x1_2233110_ryP0jG0F/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0101.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits and wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits and wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits and wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 62439 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 236.1591 to 252.4002 deg, Dec -15.2898 to -4.6725 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 236.1591 to 252.4002 deg, Dec -15.2898 to -4.6725 deg
Loaded 4831 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3832 out of 4290 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4290 out of 62439 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.781350
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.781350
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.50
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.28
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.28
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 62439 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 236.1591 to 252.4002 deg, Dec -15.2898 to -4.6725 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 236.1591 to 252.4002 deg, Dec -15.2898 to -4.6725 deg
Loaded 4831 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3832 out of 4290 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4290 out of 62439 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits (aperture=4.3)
Read 40555 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 236.1835 to 252.3628 deg, Dec -15.2669 to -4.6542 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 236.1835 to 252.3628 deg, Dec -15.2669 to -4.6542 deg
Loaded 4815 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3958 out of 4238 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4238 out of 40555 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits (aperture=4.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 42 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
2.1 pix Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits
2.1 pix fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-09-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits
2.1 pix fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0101.fits
1.9 pix wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
14.7 mag. Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-09-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0101.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.7 (SNR ) 14.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.TZkkjpYOyL (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-07_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_052337_TTUQ2b1x1_2233110_ryP0jG0F/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits' -> 'wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=2730, passed=62432
Got 62432 stars (including 59601 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 62432 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 955 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 61067 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 61066 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 61066 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 971 stars left (next iteration limit 1068)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits -region wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Fub1EY1vEw (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-07_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_052337_TTUQ2b1x1_2233110_ryP0jG0F/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits' -> 'wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=12, blended=1580, passed=40543
Got 40543 stars (including 38912 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 40543 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013028 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010422 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 958 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39952 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39952 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39952 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Excluding outliers - 968 stars left (next iteration limit 1064)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits -region wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ng0mRKwzO4 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-07_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_052337_TTUQ2b1x1_2233110_ryP0jG0F/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_052337_TTUQ2b1x1_2233110_ryP0jG0F/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-09-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_052337_TTUQ2b1x1_2233110_ryP0jG0F/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-09-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_052337_TTUQ2b1x1_2233110_ryP0jG0F/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-09-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_052337_TTUQ2b1x1_2233110_ryP0jG0F/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-09-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_052337_TTUQ2b1x1_2233110_ryP0jG0F/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-09-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_052337_TTUQ2b1x1_2233110_ryP0jG0F/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-09-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-09-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-09-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-09-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-09-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-09-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-09-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-09-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_052337_TTUQ2b1x1_2233110_ryP0jG0F/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-09-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-09-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1689, passed=41103
Got 41103 stars (including 39364 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-09-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 41103 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 947 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39931 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39933 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39933 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Excluding outliers - 970 stars left (next iteration limit 1067)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-09-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-09-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_052337_TTUQ2b1x1_2233110_ryP0jG0F/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-09-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits -region wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-09-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-09-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.OVUEzLXTjJ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-07_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_052337_TTUQ2b1x1_2233110_ryP0jG0F/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_052337_TTUQ2b1x1_2233110_ryP0jG0F/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0101.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_052337_TTUQ2b1x1_2233110_ryP0jG0F/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0101.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_052337_TTUQ2b1x1_2233110_ryP0jG0F/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0101.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_052337_TTUQ2b1x1_2233110_ryP0jG0F/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0101.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_052337_TTUQ2b1x1_2233110_ryP0jG0F/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0101.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_052337_TTUQ2b1x1_2233110_ryP0jG0F/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0101.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0101.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0101.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0101.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0101.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0101.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0101.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0101.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_052337_TTUQ2b1x1_2233110_ryP0jG0F/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0101.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0101.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=1659, passed=41165
Got 41165 stars (including 39458 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0101.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 41165 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 950 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40082 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40077 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40075 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 969 stars left (next iteration limit 1065)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0101.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0101.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_052337_TTUQ2b1x1_2233110_ryP0jG0F/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0101.fits -region wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0101.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0101.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-09-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_052337_TTUQ2b1x1_2233110_ryP0jG0F/wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-09-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0101.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_052337_TTUQ2b1x1_2233110_ryP0jG0F/wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0101.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sco-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:35:12.03 -13:09:17.5: 13.07 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:02:20.87 -08:56:23.3: 13.84 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:18:08.60 -12:15:37.1: 14.21 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:27:53.49 -12:54:37.4: 12.88 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:27:43.43 -11:43:31.9: 14.46 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:24:38.88 -12:41:09.1: 14.72 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:00:03.81 -14:10:21.9: 14.07 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:32:18.06 -12:34:10.6: 14.06 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:11:56.63 -13:44:15.5: 15.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:06:54.90 -07:42:02.2: 11.98 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:35:12.03 -13:09:17.5: 12.91 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:18:08.60 -12:15:37.1: 14.07 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.02 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:27:43.43 -11:43:31.9: 14.10 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:35:12.03 -13:09:17.5: ref_mag=13.02 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1248 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:24:38.88 -12:41:09.1: 14.61 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.17 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:18:08.60 -12:15:37.1: ref_mag=14.17 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.3310 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.69 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.32 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:00:03.81 -14:10:21.9: 13.76 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:02:20.87 -08:56:23.3: 13.65 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:27:53.49 -12:54:37.4: 12.66 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:27:43.43 -11:43:31.9: ref_mag=14.32 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.4693 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:24:38.88 -12:41:09.1: ref_mag=14.69 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.4820 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:32:18.06 -12:34:10.6: 14.08 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.95 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.78 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.80 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:00:03.81 -14:10:21.9: ref_mag=13.95 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.1229 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:02:20.87 -08:56:23.3: ref_mag=13.78 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.8581 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:27:53.49 -12:54:37.4: ref_mag=12.80 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1397 delta=-0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.07 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:32:18.06 -12:34:10.6: ref_mag=14.07 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.9236 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:11:56.63 -13:44:15.5: 15.22 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:06:54.90 -07:42:02.2: 11.83 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.93 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:06:54.90 -07:42:02.2: ref_mag=11.93 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0576 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:13:46.68 -08:28:52.1: 15.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:03:27.12 -13:43:12.2: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:11:34.96 -08:06:33.2: 13.78 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:09:16.26 -11:32:06.3: 14.33 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:24:44.32 -08:47:39.0: 14.82 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:25:51.99 -11:05:59.0: 15.05 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:17:23.56 -13:17:03.5: 14.55 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:00:08.07 -07:07:37.9: 14.60 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:14:09.94 -09:46:29.4: 14.84 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:13:46.68 -08:28:52.1: 15.34 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:03:27.12 -13:43:12.2: 15.19 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:11:34.96 -08:06:33.2: 13.57 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.70 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:11:34.96 -08:06:33.2: ref_mag=13.70 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7183 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:09:16.26 -11:32:06.3: 14.11 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.26 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:09:16.26 -11:32:06.3: ref_mag=14.26 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.2152 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:24:44.32 -08:47:39.0: 14.35 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.61 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:24:44.32 -08:47:39.0: ref_mag=14.61 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.5419 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:25:51.99 -11:05:59.0: 14.68 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:17:23.56 -13:17:03.5: 14.25 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.91 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.44 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:25:51.99 -11:05:59.0: ref_mag=14.91 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.3704 delta=0.54 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:00:08.07 -07:07:37.9: 14.48 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:17:23.56 -13:17:03.5: ref_mag=14.44 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.3577 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.57 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:00:08.07 -07:07:37.9: ref_mag=14.57 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.3792 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:14:09.94 -09:46:29.4: 14.73 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.80 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:14:09.94 -09:46:29.4: ref_mag=14.80 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.4955 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:17:55.40 -11:59:32.9: 13.45 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:03:19.47 -05:51:35.1: 15.24 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:03:29.46 -10:14:24.9: 15.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:11:25.29 -13:46:31.0: 14.85 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:25:49.50 -07:38:30.2: 15.05 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:04:26.85 -08:42:35.6: 15.02 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:01:53.93 -10:19:56.4: 14.96 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:17:55.40 -11:59:32.9: 14.31 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:03:19.47 -05:51:35.1: 14.77 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.54 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:17:55.40 -11:59:32.9: ref_mag=13.54 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.4837 delta=-0.94 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.04 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:03:19.47 -05:51:35.1: ref_mag=15.04 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.4752 delta=0.56 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:03:29.46 -10:14:24.9: 15.34 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:25:49.50 -07:38:30.2: 15.09 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:11:25.29 -13:46:31.0: 14.54 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.06 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.74 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:25:49.50 -07:38:30.2: ref_mag=15.06 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.6179 delta=0.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:11:25.29 -13:46:31.0: ref_mag=14.74 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.5734 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:04:26.85 -08:42:35.6: 14.80 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.95 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:04:26.85 -08:42:35.6: ref_mag=14.95 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.6215 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:01:53.93 -10:19:56.4: 14.80 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.91 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:01:53.93 -10:19:56.4: ref_mag=14.91 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.5904 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:27:33.42 -09:47:31.9: 14.64 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:22:38.97 -11:05:50.5: 14.82 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:10:52.47 -07:20:04.1: 15.03 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:07:55.94 -08:24:11.0: 15.28 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:16:06.71 -07:14:21.0: 14.82 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:21:50.94 -11:30:32.2: 14.20 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:27:33.42 -09:47:31.9: 14.81 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.68 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:27:33.42 -09:47:31.9: ref_mag=14.68 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.6616 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:22:38.97 -11:05:50.5: 15.06 +/- 0.29 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.86 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:22:38.97 -11:05:50.5: ref_mag=14.86 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.6971 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:07:55.94 -08:24:11.0: 14.89 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.12 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:10:52.47 -07:20:04.1: 15.43 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:07:55.94 -08:24:11.0: ref_mag=15.12 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.7611 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:16:06.71 -07:14:21.0: 15.07 +/- 0.29 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.03 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:10:52.47 -07:20:04.1: ref_mag=15.03 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.7634 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.86 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:16:06.71 -07:14:21.0: ref_mag=14.86 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.8294 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:21:50.94 -11:30:32.2: 14.86 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.28 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:21:50.94 -11:30:32.2: ref_mag=14.28 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.8337 delta=-0.56 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:20:16.74 -09:30:01.3: 15.24 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:02:54.02 -07:48:59.6: 15.07 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:20:16.74 -09:30:01.3: 15.02 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.17 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:20:16.74 -09:30:01.3: ref_mag=15.17 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.7989 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:02:54.02 -07:48:59.6: 14.76 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.95 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:02:54.02 -07:48:59.6: ref_mag=14.95 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.7478 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out73726.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out75052.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out76046.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out80402.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 9s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72795_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0101
The candidate 72795_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0101 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72796_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0101
The candidate 72796_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0101 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72804_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0101
The candidate 72804_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0101 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72808_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0101
The candidate 72808_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0101 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:26:35.74 -10:40:52.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72809_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0101
The candidate 72809_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0101 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72816_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0101
The candidate 72816_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0101 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72819_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0101
The candidate 72819_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0101 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72822_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0101
The candidate 72822_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0101 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:34:59.67 -05:52:29.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72824_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0101
The candidate 72824_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0101 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72825_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0101
The candidate 72825_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0101 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73726_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0101
Preparing report for the candidate 73726_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0101
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73810_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0101
The candidate 73810_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0101 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74815_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0101
The candidate 74815_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0101 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:02:58.22 -05:49:24.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75052_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0101
Preparing report for the candidate 75052_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0101
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75414_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0101
The candidate 75414_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0101 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:07:19.88 -13:09:12.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75783_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0101
The candidate 75783_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0101 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:19:02.80 -07:20:00.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76046_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0101
Preparing report for the candidate 76046_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0101
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77339_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0101
The candidate 77339_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0101 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78124_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0101
The candidate 78124_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0101 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:27:41.58 -08:21:17.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79697_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0101
The candidate 79697_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0101 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79822_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0101
The candidate 79822_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0101 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79919_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0101
The candidate 79919_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0101 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80076_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0101
The candidate 80076_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0101 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80161_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0101
The candidate 80161_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0101 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80275_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0101
The candidate 80275_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0101 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80337_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0101
The candidate 80337_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0101 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80338_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0101
The candidate 80338_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0101 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80402_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0101
Preparing report for the candidate 80402_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0101
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80406_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0101
The candidate 80406_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0101 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80408_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0101
The candidate 80408_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0101 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80411_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0101
The candidate 80411_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0101 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80424_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0101
The candidate 80424_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0101 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80441_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0101
The candidate 80441_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0101 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80461_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0101
The candidate 80461_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0101 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80462_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0101
The candidate 80462_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0101 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80464_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0101
The candidate 80464_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0101 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80481_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0101
The candidate 80481_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0101 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80497_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0101
The candidate 80497_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0101 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80512_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0101
The candidate 80512_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0101 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80515_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0101
The candidate 80515_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0101 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 49470_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0101
The candidate 49470_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0101 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:21:24.40 -07:42:02.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14434_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0101
The candidate 14434_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_05-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0101 did not pass the final checks