This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_035818_TTUQ1b1x1_603434_3pe35MnJ
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 07.3729 2461167.8729 13.21 23:09:10.05 +64:47:54.2
112.31577 4.05586 galactic Cep Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.9" and 6.3 pix
The object was found in VSX20" Gaia DR3 2208670546677328000
Type: E
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.960 G 13.120 G 4.760530000000 A
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits at 23:09:10.05 +64:47:54.2: 14.22 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits at 23:09:10.05 +64:47:54.2: 14.10 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.19 +/- 0.07
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 2208670546677328000,2461167.8729,13.21,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 2208670546677328000 20260507.3729 13.21CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 07.3729 2461167.8729 13.05 22:09:14.61 +63:05:25.7
105.73123 5.77063 galactic Cep Second-epoch detections are separated by 8.7" and 6.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 22:09:14.61 +63:05:25.7 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits at 22:09:14.61 +63:05:25.7: 14.50 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits at 22:09:14.61 +63:05:25.7: 14.45 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.49 +/- 0.07
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461167.8729,13.05,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260507.3729 13.05CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 07.3729 2461167.8729 13.18 22:38:23.55 +62:55:11.4
108.43993 3.85391 galactic Cep Second-epoch detections are separated by 5.6" and 7.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 22:38:23.55 +62:55:11.4 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits at 22:38:23.55 +62:55:11.4: 14.46 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits at 22:38:23.55 +62:55:11.4: 14.27 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.41 +/- 0.06
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461167.8729,13.18,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260507.3729 13.18CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 07.3729 2461167.8729 12.80 21:41:39.34 +66:48:48.3
105.77626 10.49633 galactic Cep Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 5.6 pix
The object was found in VSX18" NSV 13851
Type: CEP:
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
11.800 pg 12.200 pg
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits at 21:41:39.34 +66:48:48.3: 13.91 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits at 21:41:39.34 +66:48:48.3: 13.36 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.69 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSV 13851,2461167.8729,12.80,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSV 13851 20260507.3729 12.80CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 07.3729 2461167.8729 11.68 21:31:27.60 +65:36:49.9
104.18078 10.31591 galactic Cep Second-epoch detections are separated by 5.9" and 6.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | Gaia DR3 2220917697457009408 | 21:31:32.93 +65:37:05.2 (Gaia DR3) | T | P | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE SpType: A2 1956PMcCO..13a....B AG+65 1114
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits at 21:31:27.60 +65:36:49.9: 14.63 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits at 21:31:27.60 +65:36:49.9: 14.06 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.39 +/- 0.11
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 2220917697457009408,2461167.8729,11.68,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 2220917697457009408 20260507.3729 11.68CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 07.3729 2461167.8729 12.38 21:37:31.09 +62:52:07.4
102.76965 7.86101 galactic Cep Second-epoch detections are separated by 8.9" and 5.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | Gaia DR3 2216292803654188672 | 21:37:32.06 +62:51:27.3 (Gaia DR3) | T | P | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits at 21:37:31.09 +62:52:07.4: 13.89 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits at 21:37:31.09 +62:52:07.4: 13.38 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.67 +/- 0.06
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 2216292803654188672,2461167.8729,12.38,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 2216292803654188672 20260507.3729 12.38CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 07.3729 2461167.8729 12.47 22:15:53.31 +62:28:06.9
106.00093 4.82621 galactic Cep Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.3" and 5.7 pix
The object was found in VSX17" Gaia DR3 2204960450839348096
Type: E
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
19.300 G 19.680 G 5.598700000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits at 22:15:53.31 +62:28:06.9: 14.02 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits at 22:15:53.31 +62:28:06.9: 13.90 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.99 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 2204960450839348096,2461167.8729,12.47,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 2204960450839348096 20260507.3729 12.47CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 07.3729 2461167.8729 13.02 22:14:32.22 +65:19:54.5
107.50141 7.27447 galactic Cep Second-epoch detections are separated by 6.2" and 6.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | Gaia DR3 2218607279930128768 | 22:14:31.31 +65:20:29.4 (Gaia DR3) | T | P | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits at 22:14:32.22 +65:19:54.5: 14.77 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits at 22:14:32.22 +65:19:54.5: 14.45 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.68 +/- 0.09
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 2218607279930128768,2461167.8729,13.02,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 2218607279930128768 20260507.3729 13.02CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461032.62570392 23.12.2025 03:00:50.819 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits
First image: 2461032.62570392 23.12.2025 03:00:50.819 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits
Last image: 2461167.87321277 07.05.2026 08:57:15.583 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_035818_TTUQ1b1x1_603434_3pe35MnJ/fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 3
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.73
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 7 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 14514
Objects passed selection criteria: 14504
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 15888.8
Average stars matched: 15805.5 (99.476 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 124196 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed May 6 12:14:36 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-43-g0c21e0c3
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu May 7 03:59:31 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461032.62570392 23.12.2025 03:00:50.819 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits
First image: 2461032.62570392 23.12.2025 03:00:50.819 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits
Last image: 2461167.87321277 07.05.2026 08:57:15.583 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_035818_TTUQ1b1x1_603434_3pe35MnJ/fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 137
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.43
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 60 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 115384
Objects passed selection criteria: 115200
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 109524
Average stars matched: 108400 (98.9728 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1915704 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed May 6 12:14:36 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-43-g0c21e0c3
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu May 7 04:03:17 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_035818_TTUQ1b1x1_603434_3pe35MnJ/fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-56-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0014.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_035818_TTUQ1b1x1_603434_3pe35MnJ/fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_035818_TTUQ1b1x1_603434_3pe35MnJ/fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-56-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0014.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_035818_TTUQ1b1x1_603434_3pe35MnJ/fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461167.87249013
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits'
wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits'
wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-56-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0014.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-56-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0014.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-56-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0014.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-56-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0014.fits'
wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits
Image size: 941.6'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 22:17:13.968 +61:59:38.42 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-56-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0014.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-56-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0014.fits
Image size: 942.2'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 22:16:55.611 +61:59:51.87 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 22:17:13.968 +61:59:38.42
Second-epoch image center 22:16:55.611 +61:59:51.87
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0361 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits
Image size: 942.2'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 22:16:58.083 +62:00:22.45 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 22:17:13.968 +61:59:38.42
Second-epoch image center 22:16:58.083 +62:00:22.45
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0334 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 22:16:55.611 +61:59:51.87
Second-epoch second image center 22:16:58.083 +62:00:22.45
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00977 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits &> /tmp/tmp.d9FPcTAiuE
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits &> /tmp/tmp.64FJE3HzI5
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_035818_TTUQ1b1x1_603434_3pe35MnJ/fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-56-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0014.fits &> /tmp/tmp.y1fLKyjaFG
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_035818_TTUQ1b1x1_603434_3pe35MnJ/fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-56-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0014.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_035818_TTUQ1b1x1_603434_3pe35MnJ/fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits &> /tmp/tmp.fuQ9iIt8Wi
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_035818_TTUQ1b1x1_603434_3pe35MnJ/fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits and wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits and wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits and wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 26505 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 315.7073 to 354.1451 deg, Dec +55.3424 to +67.4078 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 315.7073 to 354.1451 deg, Dec 55.3424 to 67.4078 deg
Loaded 22030 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 12349 out of 13829 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 13829 out of 26505 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.942700
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.942700
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.73
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.21
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.21
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 26505 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 315.7073 to 354.1451 deg, Dec +55.3424 to +67.4078 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 315.7073 to 354.1451 deg, Dec 55.3424 to 67.4078 deg
Loaded 22030 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 12349 out of 13829 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 13829 out of 26505 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 13833 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 315.3774 to 354.0209 deg, Dec +55.5200 to +67.3681 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 315.3774 to 354.0209 deg, Dec 55.5200 to 67.3681 deg
Loaded 21406 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9846 out of 10295 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10295 out of 13833 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits (aperture=6.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 2 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits
2.2 pix Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
4.3 pix fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-56-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0014.fits
4.3 pix fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits
14.4 mag. Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
13.9 mag. fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-56-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0014.fits
13.9 mag. fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.9 (SNR ) 11.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.d9FPcTAiuE (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-07_CI_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_035818_TTUQ1b1x1_603434_3pe35MnJ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits' -> 'wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=3069, passed=26505
Got 26505 stars (including 23407 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 26505 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.3 to 67.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 951 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24985 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.3 to 67.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24985 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24984 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 972 stars left (next iteration limit 1069)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits -region wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.64FJE3HzI5 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-07_CI_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_035818_TTUQ1b1x1_603434_3pe35MnJ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits' -> 'wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1104, passed=13833
Got 13833 stars (including 12711 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 13833 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013094 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010476 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 788 (Dec 55.5 to 67.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 956 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13654 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 788 (Dec 55.5 to 67.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13656 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13656 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 966 stars left (next iteration limit 1062)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits -region wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.y1fLKyjaFG (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-07_CI_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_035818_TTUQ1b1x1_603434_3pe35MnJ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_035818_TTUQ1b1x1_603434_3pe35MnJ/fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-56-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0014.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_035818_TTUQ1b1x1_603434_3pe35MnJ/fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-56-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0014.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_035818_TTUQ1b1x1_603434_3pe35MnJ/fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-56-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0014.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_035818_TTUQ1b1x1_603434_3pe35MnJ/fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-56-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0014.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_035818_TTUQ1b1x1_603434_3pe35MnJ/fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-56-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0014.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_035818_TTUQ1b1x1_603434_3pe35MnJ/fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-56-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0014.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-56-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0014.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-56-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0014.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-56-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0014.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-56-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0014.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-56-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0014.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-56-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0014.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-56-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0014.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_035818_TTUQ1b1x1_603434_3pe35MnJ/fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-56-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0014.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-56-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0014.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1207, passed=11900
Got 11900 stars (including 10688 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-56-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0014.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11900 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013086 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010469 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 788 (Dec 55.6 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 959 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.74"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11743 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.76"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 788 (Dec 55.6 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11744 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.76"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11744 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.75"
Excluding outliers - 970 stars left (next iteration limit 1067)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-56-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0014.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-56-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0014.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_035818_TTUQ1b1x1_603434_3pe35MnJ/fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-56-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0014.fits -region wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-56-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0014.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-56-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0014.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.fuQ9iIt8Wi (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-07_CI_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_035818_TTUQ1b1x1_603434_3pe35MnJ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_035818_TTUQ1b1x1_603434_3pe35MnJ/fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_035818_TTUQ1b1x1_603434_3pe35MnJ/fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_035818_TTUQ1b1x1_603434_3pe35MnJ/fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_035818_TTUQ1b1x1_603434_3pe35MnJ/fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_035818_TTUQ1b1x1_603434_3pe35MnJ/fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_035818_TTUQ1b1x1_603434_3pe35MnJ/fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_035818_TTUQ1b1x1_603434_3pe35MnJ/fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1194, passed=11841
Got 11841 stars (including 10643 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11841 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013086 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010469 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 788 (Dec 55.6 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 956 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.75"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11674 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.76"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 788 (Dec 55.6 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11677 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.76"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11677 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.74"
Excluding outliers - 969 stars left (next iteration limit 1065)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_035818_TTUQ1b1x1_603434_3pe35MnJ/fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits -region wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-56-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0014.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-56-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0014.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_035818_TTUQ1b1x1_603434_3pe35MnJ/wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-56-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0014.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_035818_TTUQ1b1x1_603434_3pe35MnJ/wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cep-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits at 22:17:47.43 +60:06:52.3: 10.70 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits at 22:17:47.43 +60:06:52.3: 10.58 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.67 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:17:47.43 +60:06:52.3: ref_mag=10.67 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.6877 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30237_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 30237_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 19102_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 19102_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201241_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 201241_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201253_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 201253_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201259_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 201259_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201260_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 201260_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201263_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 201263_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201264_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 201264_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201265_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 201265_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201268_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 201268_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201276_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 201276_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201279_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 201279_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:36:00.20 +60:43:51.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201281_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 201281_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201282_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015
Preparing report for the candidate 201282_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201285_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 201285_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201287_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 201287_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201290_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 201290_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201296_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 201296_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201297_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 201297_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201300_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 201300_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201303_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 201303_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201304_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 201304_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201311_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 201311_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201312_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015
Preparing report for the candidate 201312_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201313_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 201313_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201318_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 201318_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201320_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 201320_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201327_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015
Preparing report for the candidate 201327_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201329_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 201329_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201330_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 201330_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201333_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 201333_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201337_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 201337_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201340_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 201340_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201346_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 201346_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201348_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 201348_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201356_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 201356_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201358_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 201358_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:31:57.24 +66:53:11.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201363_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 201363_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201366_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 201366_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201369_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 201369_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201375_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 201375_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201376_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 201376_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201378_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015
Preparing report for the candidate 201378_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201384_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 201384_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:08:48.15 +58:50:12.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201388_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 201388_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201391_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 201391_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201392_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 201392_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:53:51.73 +57:15:38.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201399_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 201399_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:25:32.97 +61:14:43.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201405_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 201405_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:04:35.79 +65:41:34.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201406_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 201406_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201409_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 201409_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201411_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 201411_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201413_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 201413_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201424_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 201424_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201428_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 201428_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201439_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 201439_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201443_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 201443_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201445_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 201445_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201446_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 201446_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201453_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 201453_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:13:14.75 +57:37:01.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201457_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 201457_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201459_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 201459_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201463_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 201463_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201465_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 201465_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:59:44.18 +59:27:07.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201468_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 201468_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201470_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 201470_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201472_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 201472_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201477_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 201477_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:04:50.10 +65:42:01.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201484_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 201484_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201485_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 201485_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201489_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 201489_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201490_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 201490_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201492_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 201492_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201501_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 201501_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:01:44.64 +59:02:24.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201504_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 201504_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201508_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 201508_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201512_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 201512_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201513_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 201513_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:50:46.88 +58:55:31.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201514_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 201514_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201596_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015
Preparing report for the candidate 201596_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201659_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 201659_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201679_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015
Preparing report for the candidate 201679_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201713_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015
Preparing report for the candidate 201713_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201800_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 201800_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:19:05.25 +64:52:57.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201825_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 201825_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:12:19.86 +63:10:35.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201884_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015
Preparing report for the candidate 201884_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201910_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 201910_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 202009_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 202009_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 202019_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 202019_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147650_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 147650_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05665_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 05665_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12384_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 12384_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50068_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 50068_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200237_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 200237_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:19:18.81 +56:44:51.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68096_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 68096_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161737_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 161737_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (36.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05032_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 05032_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08564_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 08564_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146276_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 146276_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146066_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 146066_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:02:01.20 +57:38:20.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 149278_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 149278_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:23:30.71 +58:52:24.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 125413_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 125413_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (36.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36319_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 36319_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 48731_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 48731_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11737_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 11737_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_03-57-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
