This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_004329_TTUQ2b1x1_684265_Iz0VSurp
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 07.2367 2461167.7367 12.14 11:01:31.19 +05:13:11.4
247.94308 55.87194 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 2.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.19 Fortuna -1 0 1 12.3 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 11:01:31.19 +05:13:11.4: 15.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 11:01:31.19 +05:13:11.4: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 07.2367* 11 01 31.19 +05 13 11.4 12.1 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461167.7367,12.14,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260507.2367 12.14CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 07.2367 2461167.7367 12.13 11:23:22.63 +06:19:05.8
253.78693 60.48934 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 2.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.65 Cybele -0 0 1 12.3 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 11:23:22.63 +06:19:05.8: 15.68 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 11:23:22.63 +06:19:05.8: 15.77 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 07.2367* 11 23 22.63 +06 19 05.8 12.1 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461167.7367,12.13,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260507.2367 12.13CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 07.2367 2461167.7367 13.53 11:14:11.58 +04:37:44.2
252.77128 57.69549 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 2.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.453 Tea -1 -0 1 13.8 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 11:14:11.58 +04:37:44.2: 15.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 11:14:11.58 +04:37:44.2: 16.01 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 07.2367* 11 14 11.58 +04 37 44.2 13.5 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461167.7367,13.53,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260507.2367 13.53CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 07.2367 2461167.7367 13.71 11:35:44.62 +04:13:54.9
261.34815 60.83729 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 2.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.207 Hedda -0 1 1 13.9 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 11:35:44.62 +04:13:54.9: 15.74 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 11:35:44.62 +04:13:54.9: 15.75 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 07.2367* 11 35 44.62 +04 13 54.9 13.7 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461167.7367,13.71,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260507.2367 13.71CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 07.2367 2461167.7367 13.62 11:01:35.28 +03:55:47.2
249.60943 54.99396 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 2.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.189 Phthia -0 1 1 13.8 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 11:01:35.28 +03:55:47.2: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 11:01:35.28 +03:55:47.2: 16.07 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 07.2367* 11 01 35.28 +03 55 47.2 13.6 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461167.7367,13.62,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260507.2367 13.62CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 07.2367 2461167.7367 14.12 11:00:59.60 +09:00:54.8
242.49115 58.24861 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 2.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.90 Antiope 0 1 1 14.3 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 11:00:59.60 +09:00:54.8: 16.06 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 11:00:59.60 +09:00:54.8: 16.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 07.2367* 11 00 59.60 +09 00 54.8 14.1 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461167.7367,14.12,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260507.2367 14.12CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 07.2367 2461167.7367 14.62 11:33:42.07 +04:26:16.3
260.26056 60.69741 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 2.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.332 Siri -1 0 1 14.7 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 11:33:42.07 +04:26:16.3: 15.75 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 11:33:42.07 +04:26:16.3: 15.87 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 07.2367* 11 33 42.07 +04 26 16.3 14.6 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461167.7367,14.62,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260507.2367 14.62CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 07.2367 2461167.7367 14.79 11:20:45.80 +01:56:15.4
258.31942 56.73928 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 4.0" and 2.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.327 Columbia -0 4 4 14.9 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 11:20:45.80 +01:56:15.4: 15.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 11:20:45.80 +01:56:15.4: 15.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 07.2367* 11 20 45.80 +01 56 15.4 14.8 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461167.7367,14.79,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260507.2367 14.79CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461146.72985719 16.04.2026 05:30:49.661 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
First image: 2461146.72985719 16.04.2026 05:30:49.661 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
Last image: 2461167.73699404 07.05.2026 05:41:06.285 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_004329_TTUQ2b1x1_684265_Iz0VSurp/fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 7
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.61
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 4392
Objects passed selection criteria: 4391
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 4245.75
Average stars matched: 4106.5 (96.7202 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 110908 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed May 6 12:14:36 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-43-g0c21e0c3
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu May 7 00:48:32 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461146.72985719 16.04.2026 05:30:49.661 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
First image: 2461146.72985719 16.04.2026 05:30:49.661 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
Last image: 2461167.73699404 07.05.2026 05:41:06.285 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_004329_TTUQ2b1x1_684265_Iz0VSurp/fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 207
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.29
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 12 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 24002
Objects passed selection criteria: 23940
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 23176.2
Average stars matched: 22118 (95.4339 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 129160 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed May 6 12:14:36 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-43-g0c21e0c3
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu May 7 00:50:05 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_004329_TTUQ2b1x1_684265_Iz0VSurp/fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-40-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0117.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_004329_TTUQ2b1x1_684265_Iz0VSurp/fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_004329_TTUQ2b1x1_684265_Iz0VSurp/fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-40-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0117.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_004329_TTUQ2b1x1_684265_Iz0VSurp/fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461167.73648361
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits'
wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits'
wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-40-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0117.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-40-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0117.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-40-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0117.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-40-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0117.fits'
wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:08:37.871 +05:58:55.04 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-40-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0117.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-40-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0117.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:08:46.974 +05:59:37.73 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:08:37.871 +05:58:55.04
Second-epoch image center 11:08:46.974 +05:59:37.73
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0395 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:08:47.924 +05:59:41.89 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:08:37.871 +05:58:55.04
Second-epoch image center 11:08:47.924 +05:59:41.89
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0436 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 11:08:46.974 +05:59:37.73
Second-epoch second image center 11:08:47.924 +05:59:41.89
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00410 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits &> /tmp/tmp.dAw6cj3F2o
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits &> /tmp/tmp.zDuDwWe11Z
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_004329_TTUQ2b1x1_684265_Iz0VSurp/fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-40-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0117.fits &> /tmp/tmp.oCsQzJkUtu
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_004329_TTUQ2b1x1_684265_Iz0VSurp/fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-40-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0117.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_004329_TTUQ2b1x1_684265_Iz0VSurp/fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118.fits &> /tmp/tmp.t40l9F5twa
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_004329_TTUQ2b1x1_684265_Iz0VSurp/fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits and wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits and wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits and wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits) and catalog (wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 6014 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 159.1319 to 175.0599 deg, Dec +0.5959 to +11.2736 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 159.1319 to 175.0599 deg, Dec 0.5959 to 11.2736 deg
Loaded 3946 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3223 out of 3349 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3349 out of 6014 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.800800
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.800800
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.61
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.19
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.19
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 6014 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 159.1319 to 175.0599 deg, Dec +0.5959 to +11.2736 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 159.1319 to 175.0599 deg, Dec 0.5959 to 11.2736 deg
Loaded 3946 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3223 out of 3349 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3349 out of 6014 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits (aperture=6.7)
Read 5979 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 159.0424 to 175.4602 deg, Dec +0.1921 to +11.6322 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 159.0424 to 175.4602 deg, Dec 0.1921 to 11.6322 deg
Loaded 4379 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3233 out of 3365 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3365 out of 5979 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits (aperture=6.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 4 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.5 pix Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
2.2 pix Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
2.5 pix fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-40-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0117.fits
2.5 pix fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118.fits
2.5 pix wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
15.3 mag. Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-40-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0117.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.0 (SNR ) 12.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.dAw6cj3F2o (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_004329_TTUQ2b1x1_684265_Iz0VSurp/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=380, passed=6014
Got 6014 stars (including 5628 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6014 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 452 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 933 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5931 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 452 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5929 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5929 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 943 stars left (next iteration limit 1037)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits -region wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.zDuDwWe11Z (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_004329_TTUQ2b1x1_684265_Iz0VSurp/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=392, passed=5979
Got 5979 stars (including 5577 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5979 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 450 to 510 (Dec 0.2 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 933 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5897 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 450 to 510 (Dec 0.2 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5896 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5896 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 943 stars left (next iteration limit 1037)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits -region wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.oCsQzJkUtu (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_004329_TTUQ2b1x1_684265_Iz0VSurp/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_004329_TTUQ2b1x1_684265_Iz0VSurp/fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-40-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0117.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_004329_TTUQ2b1x1_684265_Iz0VSurp/fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-40-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0117.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_004329_TTUQ2b1x1_684265_Iz0VSurp/fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-40-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0117.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_004329_TTUQ2b1x1_684265_Iz0VSurp/fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-40-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0117.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_004329_TTUQ2b1x1_684265_Iz0VSurp/fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-40-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0117.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_004329_TTUQ2b1x1_684265_Iz0VSurp/fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-40-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0117.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-40-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0117.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-40-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0117.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-40-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0117.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-40-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0117.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-40-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0117.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-40-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0117.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-40-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0117.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_004329_TTUQ2b1x1_684265_Iz0VSurp/fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-40-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0117.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-40-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0117.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=308, passed=5146
Got 5146 stars (including 4835 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-40-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0117.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5146 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 932 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5073 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5074 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5074 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 945 stars left (next iteration limit 1039)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-40-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0117.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-40-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0117.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_004329_TTUQ2b1x1_684265_Iz0VSurp/fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-40-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0117.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-40-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0117.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-40-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0117.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.t40l9F5twa (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_004329_TTUQ2b1x1_684265_Iz0VSurp/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_004329_TTUQ2b1x1_684265_Iz0VSurp/fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_004329_TTUQ2b1x1_684265_Iz0VSurp/fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_004329_TTUQ2b1x1_684265_Iz0VSurp/fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_004329_TTUQ2b1x1_684265_Iz0VSurp/fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_004329_TTUQ2b1x1_684265_Iz0VSurp/fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_004329_TTUQ2b1x1_684265_Iz0VSurp/fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_004329_TTUQ2b1x1_684265_Iz0VSurp/fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=314, passed=5108
Got 5108 stars (including 4792 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5108 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 929 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5025 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5027 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5027 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Excluding outliers - 945 stars left (next iteration limit 1039)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_004329_TTUQ2b1x1_684265_Iz0VSurp/fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-40-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0117.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-40-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0117.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_004329_TTUQ2b1x1_684265_Iz0VSurp/wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-40-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0117.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_004329_TTUQ2b1x1_684265_Iz0VSurp/wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Leo-07-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 11:23:22.63 +06:19:05.8: 15.68 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 11:01:31.19 +05:13:11.4: 15.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 11:00:03.71 +05:49:07.9: 12.31 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 11:00:03.71 +05:49:07.9: 12.31 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 11:01:31.19 +05:13:11.4: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 11:23:22.63 +06:19:05.8: 15.77 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.31 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:00:03.71 +05:49:07.9: ref_mag=12.31 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2914 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20525.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20526.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 7s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20525_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118
Preparing report for the candidate 20525_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20526_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118
Preparing report for the candidate 20526_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20527_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 20527_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03293_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 03293_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:10:50.74 +05:27:34.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 9s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Leo-07-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
11:01:31.19 +05:13:11.4
11:23:22.63 +06:19:05.8
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_004329_TTUQ2b1x1_684265_Iz0VSurp/fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-40-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0117.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_004329_TTUQ2b1x1_684265_Iz0VSurp/fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_004329_TTUQ2b1x1_684265_Iz0VSurp/fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-40-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0117.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_004329_TTUQ2b1x1_684265_Iz0VSurp/fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-40-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0117.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-40-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0117.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:08:37.871 +05:58:55.04 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-40-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0117.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-40-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0117.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:08:46.974 +05:59:37.73 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:08:37.871 +05:58:55.04
Second-epoch image center 11:08:46.974 +05:59:37.73
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0395 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:08:47.924 +05:59:41.89 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:08:37.871 +05:58:55.04
Second-epoch image center 11:08:47.924 +05:59:41.89
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0436 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 11:08:46.974 +05:59:37.73
Second-epoch second image center 11:08:47.924 +05:59:41.89
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00410 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Z1QutmApbh
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits &> /tmp/tmp.qvYDyfyXJu
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_004329_TTUQ2b1x1_684265_Iz0VSurp/fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-40-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0117.fits &> /tmp/tmp.6quOT8d3nD
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_004329_TTUQ2b1x1_684265_Iz0VSurp/fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-40-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0117.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_004329_TTUQ2b1x1_684265_Iz0VSurp/fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118.fits &> /tmp/tmp.2rgnFcHYzx
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_004329_TTUQ2b1x1_684265_Iz0VSurp/fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits and wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits and wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits and wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits) and catalog (wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 31020 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 159.1320 to 175.0637 deg, Dec +0.5959 to +11.2851 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 159.1320 to 175.0637 deg, Dec 0.5959 to 11.2851 deg
Loaded 3949 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3105 out of 3398 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3398 out of 31020 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.657800
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.657800
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.29
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.37
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.37
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 31020 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 159.1320 to 175.0637 deg, Dec +0.5959 to +11.2851 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 159.1320 to 175.0637 deg, Dec 0.5959 to 11.2851 deg
Loaded 3949 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3105 out of 3398 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3398 out of 31020 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits (aperture=5.0)
Read 32625 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 158.9765 to 175.4716 deg, Dec +0.1922 to +11.6821 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 158.9765 to 175.4716 deg, Dec 0.1922 to 11.6821 deg
Loaded 4428 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3126 out of 3432 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3432 out of 32625 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits (aperture=4.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 121 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
2.1 pix Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
2.3 pix fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-40-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0117.fits
2.3 pix fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
15.4 mag. Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
15.1 mag. fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-40-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0117.fits
15.1 mag. fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.1 (SNR ) 14.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.Z1QutmApbh (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_004329_TTUQ2b1x1_684265_Iz0VSurp/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=18, blended=1265, passed=31002
Got 31002 stars (including 29705 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 31002 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 452 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 936 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30704 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 452 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30705 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30705 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 947 stars left (next iteration limit 1041)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits -region wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.qvYDyfyXJu (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_004329_TTUQ2b1x1_684265_Iz0VSurp/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=1301, passed=32615
Got 32615 stars (including 31250 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 32615 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 450 to 510 (Dec 0.2 to 11.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 937 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32316 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 450 to 510 (Dec 0.2 to 11.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32315 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32315 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 947 stars left (next iteration limit 1041)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits -region wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.6quOT8d3nD (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_004329_TTUQ2b1x1_684265_Iz0VSurp/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_004329_TTUQ2b1x1_684265_Iz0VSurp/fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-40-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0117.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_004329_TTUQ2b1x1_684265_Iz0VSurp/fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-40-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0117.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_004329_TTUQ2b1x1_684265_Iz0VSurp/fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-40-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0117.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_004329_TTUQ2b1x1_684265_Iz0VSurp/fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-40-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0117.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_004329_TTUQ2b1x1_684265_Iz0VSurp/fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-40-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0117.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_004329_TTUQ2b1x1_684265_Iz0VSurp/fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-40-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0117.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-40-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0117.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-40-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0117.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-40-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0117.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-40-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0117.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-40-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0117.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-40-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0117.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-40-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0117.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_004329_TTUQ2b1x1_684265_Iz0VSurp/fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-40-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0117.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-40-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0117.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=1299, passed=26145
Got 26145 stars (including 24820 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-40-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0117.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 26145 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 932 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25794 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25793 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25793 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 945 stars left (next iteration limit 1039)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-40-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0117.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-40-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0117.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_004329_TTUQ2b1x1_684265_Iz0VSurp/fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-40-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0117.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-40-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0117.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-40-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0117.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.2rgnFcHYzx (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_004329_TTUQ2b1x1_684265_Iz0VSurp/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_004329_TTUQ2b1x1_684265_Iz0VSurp/fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_004329_TTUQ2b1x1_684265_Iz0VSurp/fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_004329_TTUQ2b1x1_684265_Iz0VSurp/fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_004329_TTUQ2b1x1_684265_Iz0VSurp/fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_004329_TTUQ2b1x1_684265_Iz0VSurp/fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_004329_TTUQ2b1x1_684265_Iz0VSurp/fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_004329_TTUQ2b1x1_684265_Iz0VSurp/fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=12, blended=1359, passed=26274
Got 26274 stars (including 24888 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 26274 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 930 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25917 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25916 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25916 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 946 stars left (next iteration limit 1040)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_004329_TTUQ2b1x1_684265_Iz0VSurp/fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-40-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0117.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_004329_TTUQ2b1x1_684265_Iz0VSurp/wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-40-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0117.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_004329_TTUQ2b1x1_684265_Iz0VSurp/wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Leo-07-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 11:09:47.64 +06:22:04.7: 15.12 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 11:09:47.64 +06:22:04.7: 14.81 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.91 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:09:47.64 +06:22:04.7: ref_mag=14.91 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.8364 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 11:10:19.78 +04:14:57.8: 13.33 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 11:14:11.58 +04:37:44.2: 15.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 11:10:19.78 +04:14:57.8: 13.37 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.35 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:10:19.78 +04:14:57.8: ref_mag=13.35 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.4802 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 11:35:44.62 +04:13:54.9: 15.74 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 11:14:11.58 +04:37:44.2: 16.01 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 11:35:44.62 +04:13:54.9: 15.75 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 11:01:35.28 +03:55:47.2: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 11:01:35.28 +03:55:47.2: 16.07 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 11:00:59.60 +09:00:54.8: 16.06 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 11:11:51.49 +03:47:54.0: 13.98 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 11:00:59.60 +09:00:54.8: 16.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 11:11:51.49 +03:47:54.0: 14.06 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.02 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:11:51.49 +03:47:54.0: ref_mag=14.02 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.1258 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 11:24:25.08 +09:29:18.9: 14.25 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 11:24:25.08 +09:29:18.9: 14.49 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.35 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:24:25.08 +09:29:18.9: ref_mag=14.35 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.2454 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 11:33:42.07 +04:26:16.3: 15.75 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 11:24:10.11 +08:35:33.3: 15.27 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 11:33:42.07 +04:26:16.3: 15.87 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 11:35:02.46 +07:00:54.9: 14.89 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 11:24:10.11 +08:35:33.3: 15.43 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.35 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:24:10.11 +08:35:33.3: ref_mag=15.35 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.8997 delta=0.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 11:35:02.46 +07:00:54.9: 14.69 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.76 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:35:02.46 +07:00:54.9: ref_mag=14.76 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.7869 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 11:20:45.80 +01:56:15.4: 15.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 11:15:44.31 +02:54:24.4: 15.81 +/- 0.32 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 11:15:44.31 +02:54:24.4: 15.52 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.62 +/- 0.18
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:15:44.31 +02:54:24.4: ref_mag=15.62 +/- 0.18 new_mean_mag=14.9293 delta=0.69 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 11:20:45.80 +01:56:15.4: 15.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53582.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53592.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53600.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53652.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53752.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53788.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 12s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 6s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53498_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 53498_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53514_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 53514_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53518_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 53518_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:06:45.01 +01:57:44.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53519_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 53519_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53523_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 53523_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:01:31.18 +05:13:11.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53524_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 53524_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:23:22.61 +06:19:05.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53526_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 53526_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53528_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 53528_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53530_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 53530_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53531_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 53531_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53535_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 53535_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53538_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 53538_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53543_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 53543_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53547_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 53547_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53548_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 53548_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53550_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 53550_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53551_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 53551_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53554_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 53554_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:18:56.42 +10:11:22.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53555_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 53555_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53558_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 53558_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53560_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 53560_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53561_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 53561_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53564_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 53564_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:28:23.80 +09:24:26.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53565_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 53565_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53566_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 53566_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53567_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 53567_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53569_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 53569_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53571_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 53571_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53574_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 53574_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53575_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 53575_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53576_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 53576_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53577_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 53577_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:04:58.24 +07:22:12.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53578_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 53578_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53579_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 53579_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53581_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 53581_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:50:45.23 +06:57:25.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53582_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118
Preparing report for the candidate 53582_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53583_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 53583_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53584_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 53584_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53585_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 53585_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53586_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 53586_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53591_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 53591_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53592_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118
Preparing report for the candidate 53592_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53594_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 53594_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53595_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 53595_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53597_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 53597_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53599_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 53599_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53600_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118
Preparing report for the candidate 53600_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53601_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 53601_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53604_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 53604_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53606_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 53606_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:31:39.69 +03:01:01.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53607_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 53607_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53609_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 53609_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53610_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 53610_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53611_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 53611_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53613_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 53613_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53614_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 53614_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53618_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 53618_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53621_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 53621_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53622_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 53622_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53624_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 53624_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53625_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 53625_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53627_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 53627_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53630_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 53630_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53631_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 53631_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53635_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 53635_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53638_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 53638_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53639_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 53639_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53640_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 53640_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53641_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 53641_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53642_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 53642_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53643_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 53643_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53645_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 53645_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53647_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 53647_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53652_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118
Preparing report for the candidate 53652_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53656_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 53656_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53659_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 53659_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53661_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 53661_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53662_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 53662_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53664_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 53664_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53665_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 53665_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53666_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 53666_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53668_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 53668_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53670_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 53670_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53675_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 53675_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53676_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 53676_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53677_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 53677_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53678_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 53678_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53684_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 53684_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53685_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 53685_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53691_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 53691_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53693_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 53693_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53694_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 53694_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53698_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 53698_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53700_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 53700_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:09:15.47 +04:41:53.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53701_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 53701_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53703_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 53703_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53708_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 53708_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53712_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 53712_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53713_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 53713_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53714_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 53714_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53715_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 53715_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53730_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 53730_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53736_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 53736_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53740_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 53740_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53749_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 53749_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53750_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 53750_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53752_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118
Preparing report for the candidate 53752_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53754_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 53754_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53757_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 53757_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53762_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 53762_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53763_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 53763_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53766_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 53766_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53770_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 53770_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53774_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 53774_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53776_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 53776_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:15:58.57 +09:01:19.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53780_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 53780_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53782_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 53782_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53784_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 53784_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53788_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118
Preparing report for the candidate 53788_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53792_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 53792_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 16796_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118
The candidate 16796_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-07_00-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0118 did not pass the final checks
