This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002118_TTUQ1b1x1_4101525_ikRVfV9O
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 07.2222 2461167.7222 11.51 10:16:09.36 +15:03:48.8
223.39193 52.00657 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 7.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.11 Parthenope -2 1 2 11.6 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 10:16:09.36 +15:03:48.8: 15.77 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 10:16:09.36 +15:03:48.8: 15.79 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 07.2222* 10 16 09.36 +15 03 48.8 11.5 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461167.7222,11.51,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260507.2222 11.51CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 07.2222 2461167.7222 13.55 10:58:06.90 +10:40:58.0
239.12869 58.68656 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.1" and 8.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.140 Siwa -1 0 1 13.6 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 10:58:06.90 +10:40:58.0: 16.02 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 10:58:06.90 +10:40:58.0: 15.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 07.2222* 10 58 06.90 +10 40 58.0 13.6 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461167.7222,13.55,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260507.2222 13.55CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 07.2222 2461167.7222 14.06 11:00:59.53 +09:00:56.0
242.49031 58.24859 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 7.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.90 Antiope -1 1 1 14.3 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 11:00:59.53 +09:00:56.0: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 11:00:59.53 +09:00:56.0: 15.71 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 07.2222* 11 00 59.53 +09 00 56.0 14.1 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461167.7222,14.06,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260507.2222 14.06CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 07.2222 2461167.7222 14.49 10:15:10.30 +10:04:08.2
230.20758 49.47106 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 8.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.808 Merxia -2 2 2 14.8 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 10:15:10.30 +10:04:08.2: 15.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 10:15:10.30 +10:04:08.2: 15.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 07.2222* 10 15 10.30 +10 04 08.2 14.5 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461167.7222,14.49,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260507.2222 14.49CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 07.2222 2461167.7222 14.77 11:03:16.92 +10:30:13.0
240.87517 59.60431 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.6" and 7.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.534 Nassovia -2 -0 2 14.8 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 11:03:16.92 +10:30:13.0: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 11:03:16.92 +10:30:13.0: 15.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 07.2222* 11 03 16.92 +10 30 13.0 14.8 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461167.7222,14.77,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260507.2222 14.77CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461120.72857596 21.03.2026 05:28:58.963 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
First image: 2461120.72857596 21.03.2026 05:28:58.963 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
Last image: 2461167.72258799 07.05.2026 05:20:21.602 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002118_TTUQ1b1x1_4101525_ikRVfV9O/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 1
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.60
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 6187
Objects passed selection criteria: 6184
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 5795.5
Average stars matched: 5659 (97.6447 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 112216 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed May 6 12:14:36 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-43-g0c21e0c3
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu May 7 00:23:57 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461120.72857596 21.03.2026 05:28:58.963 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
First image: 2461120.72857596 21.03.2026 05:28:58.963 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
Last image: 2461167.72258799 07.05.2026 05:20:21.602 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002118_TTUQ1b1x1_4101525_ikRVfV9O/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 85
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.37
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 10 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 32221
Objects passed selection criteria: 32138
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 30816.2
Average stars matched: 29504.8 (95.7441 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 133652 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed May 6 12:14:36 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-43-g0c21e0c3
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu May 7 00:25:15 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002118_TTUQ1b1x1_4101525_ikRVfV9O/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-19-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0074.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002118_TTUQ1b1x1_4101525_ikRVfV9O/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002118_TTUQ1b1x1_4101525_ikRVfV9O/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-19-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0074.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002118_TTUQ1b1x1_4101525_ikRVfV9O/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461167.72182325
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits'
wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits'
wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-19-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0074.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-19-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0074.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-19-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0074.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-19-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0074.fits'
wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:39:50.454 +14:01:49.13 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-19-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0074.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-19-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0074.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:40:08.402 +14:00:27.00 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:39:50.454 +14:01:49.13
Second-epoch image center 10:40:08.402 +14:00:27.00
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0761 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:40:05.956 +13:59:56.66 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:39:50.454 +14:01:49.13
Second-epoch image center 10:40:05.956 +13:59:56.66
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0700 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 10:40:08.402 +14:00:27.00
Second-epoch second image center 10:40:05.956 +13:59:56.66
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01299 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits &> /tmp/tmp.gLN1CsLpFg
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ujwntSDoj2
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002118_TTUQ1b1x1_4101525_ikRVfV9O/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-19-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0074.fits &> /tmp/tmp.W746a22Lvn
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002118_TTUQ1b1x1_4101525_ikRVfV9O/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-19-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0074.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002118_TTUQ1b1x1_4101525_ikRVfV9O/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits &> /tmp/tmp.F0xvYutXqW
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002118_TTUQ1b1x1_4101525_ikRVfV9O/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits and wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits and wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits and wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits) and catalog (wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 6682 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 151.7675 to 168.2412 deg, Dec +8.6439 to +19.2936 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 151.7675 to 168.2412 deg, Dec 8.6439 to 19.2936 deg
Loaded 4244 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3452 out of 3573 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3573 out of 6682 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.924550
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.924550
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.60
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.32
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.32
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 6682 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 151.7675 to 168.2412 deg, Dec +8.6439 to +19.2936 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 151.7675 to 168.2412 deg, Dec 8.6439 to 19.2936 deg
Loaded 4244 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3452 out of 3573 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3573 out of 6682 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits (aperture=6.6)
Read 6275 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 151.6959 to 168.1623 deg, Dec +8.5198 to +19.2643 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 151.6959 to 168.1623 deg, Dec 8.5198 to 19.2643 deg
Loaded 4298 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3432 out of 3542 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3542 out of 6275 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits (aperture=6.7)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 1 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.4 pix Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
2.5 pix Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits
2.2 pix fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-19-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0074.fits
2.2 pix fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits
2.4 pix wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
2.5 pix wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
15.2 mag. Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-19-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0074.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.0 (SNR ) 12.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.gLN1CsLpFg (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002118_TTUQ1b1x1_4101525_ikRVfV9O/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=396, passed=6682
Got 6682 stars (including 6282 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6682 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 870 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 870 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 854 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 870 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6520 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 870 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 870 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6518 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 870 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6518 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 870 stars left (next iteration limit 957)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits -region wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ujwntSDoj2 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002118_TTUQ1b1x1_4101525_ikRVfV9O/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=378, passed=6275
Got 6275 stars (including 5894 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6275 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 864 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 864 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 850 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 864 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6135 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 864 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 864 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6139 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 864 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6139 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Excluding outliers - 864 stars left (next iteration limit 950)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits -region wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.W746a22Lvn (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002118_TTUQ1b1x1_4101525_ikRVfV9O/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002118_TTUQ1b1x1_4101525_ikRVfV9O/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-19-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0074.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002118_TTUQ1b1x1_4101525_ikRVfV9O/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-19-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0074.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002118_TTUQ1b1x1_4101525_ikRVfV9O/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-19-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0074.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002118_TTUQ1b1x1_4101525_ikRVfV9O/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-19-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0074.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002118_TTUQ1b1x1_4101525_ikRVfV9O/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-19-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0074.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002118_TTUQ1b1x1_4101525_ikRVfV9O/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-19-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0074.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-19-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0074.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-19-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0074.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-19-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0074.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-19-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0074.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-19-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0074.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-19-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0074.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-19-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0074.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002118_TTUQ1b1x1_4101525_ikRVfV9O/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-19-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0074.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-19-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0074.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=342, passed=5195
Got 5195 stars (including 4849 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-19-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0074.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5195 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 877 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 877 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 868 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 877 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5079 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 876 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 876 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5079 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 876 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5078 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 876 stars left (next iteration limit 964)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-19-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0074.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-19-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0074.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002118_TTUQ1b1x1_4101525_ikRVfV9O/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-19-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0074.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-19-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0074.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-19-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0074.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.F0xvYutXqW (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002118_TTUQ1b1x1_4101525_ikRVfV9O/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002118_TTUQ1b1x1_4101525_ikRVfV9O/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002118_TTUQ1b1x1_4101525_ikRVfV9O/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002118_TTUQ1b1x1_4101525_ikRVfV9O/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002118_TTUQ1b1x1_4101525_ikRVfV9O/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002118_TTUQ1b1x1_4101525_ikRVfV9O/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002118_TTUQ1b1x1_4101525_ikRVfV9O/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002118_TTUQ1b1x1_4101525_ikRVfV9O/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=339, passed=5175
Got 5175 stars (including 4830 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5175 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 877 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 877 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 867 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 877 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5063 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 876 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 876 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5065 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 876 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5056 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 876 stars left (next iteration limit 964)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002118_TTUQ1b1x1_4101525_ikRVfV9O/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-19-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0074.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-19-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0074.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002118_TTUQ1b1x1_4101525_ikRVfV9O/wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-19-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0074.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002118_TTUQ1b1x1_4101525_ikRVfV9O/wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Leo-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 10:16:09.36 +15:03:48.8: 15.77 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 10:16:09.36 +15:03:48.8: 15.79 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20433.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 5s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20433_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075
Preparing report for the candidate 20433_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 6s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Leo-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
10:16:09.36 +15:03:48.8
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002118_TTUQ1b1x1_4101525_ikRVfV9O/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-19-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0074.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002118_TTUQ1b1x1_4101525_ikRVfV9O/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002118_TTUQ1b1x1_4101525_ikRVfV9O/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-19-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0074.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002118_TTUQ1b1x1_4101525_ikRVfV9O/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-19-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0074.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-19-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0074.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:39:50.454 +14:01:49.13 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-19-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0074.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-19-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0074.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:40:08.402 +14:00:27.00 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:39:50.454 +14:01:49.13
Second-epoch image center 10:40:08.402 +14:00:27.00
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0761 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:40:05.956 +13:59:56.66 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:39:50.454 +14:01:49.13
Second-epoch image center 10:40:05.956 +13:59:56.66
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0700 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 10:40:08.402 +14:00:27.00
Second-epoch second image center 10:40:05.956 +13:59:56.66
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01299 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Rz2wJrdSP8
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits &> /tmp/tmp.KHYMNFYyL6
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002118_TTUQ1b1x1_4101525_ikRVfV9O/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-19-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0074.fits &> /tmp/tmp.GseNS0djl0
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002118_TTUQ1b1x1_4101525_ikRVfV9O/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-19-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0074.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002118_TTUQ1b1x1_4101525_ikRVfV9O/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits &> /tmp/tmp.5iUJE58yub
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002118_TTUQ1b1x1_4101525_ikRVfV9O/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits and wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits and wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits and wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits) and catalog (wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 32385 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 151.7675 to 168.2695 deg, Dec +8.6169 to +19.3027 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 151.7675 to 168.2695 deg, Dec 8.6169 to 19.3027 deg
Loaded 4269 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3332 out of 3598 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3598 out of 32385 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.824350
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.824350
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.37
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.45
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.45
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 32385 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 151.7675 to 168.2695 deg, Dec +8.6169 to +19.3027 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 151.7675 to 168.2695 deg, Dec 8.6169 to 19.3027 deg
Loaded 4269 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3332 out of 3598 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3598 out of 32385 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits (aperture=5.3)
Read 31779 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 151.6728 to 168.1777 deg, Dec +8.5198 to +19.2712 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 151.6728 to 168.1777 deg, Dec 8.5198 to 19.2712 deg
Loaded 4310 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3341 out of 3603 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3603 out of 31779 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits (aperture=5.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 70 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
2.2 pix Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits
2.0 pix fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-19-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0074.fits
2.0 pix fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
15.4 mag. Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits
15.2 mag. fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-19-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0074.fits
15.2 mag. fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.2 (SNR ) 14.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.Rz2wJrdSP8 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002118_TTUQ1b1x1_4101525_ikRVfV9O/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=18, blended=1352, passed=32367
Got 32367 stars (including 30972 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 32367 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 874 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 874 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 866 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 874 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31787 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 874 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 874 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31784 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 874 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31784 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 874 stars left (next iteration limit 961)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits -region wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.KHYMNFYyL6 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002118_TTUQ1b1x1_4101525_ikRVfV9O/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=21, blended=1252, passed=31758
Got 31758 stars (including 30468 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 31758 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 865 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 865 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 854 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 865 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31225 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 865 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 865 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31223 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 865 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31223 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 865 stars left (next iteration limit 951)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits -region wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.GseNS0djl0 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002118_TTUQ1b1x1_4101525_ikRVfV9O/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002118_TTUQ1b1x1_4101525_ikRVfV9O/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-19-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0074.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002118_TTUQ1b1x1_4101525_ikRVfV9O/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-19-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0074.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002118_TTUQ1b1x1_4101525_ikRVfV9O/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-19-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0074.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002118_TTUQ1b1x1_4101525_ikRVfV9O/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-19-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0074.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002118_TTUQ1b1x1_4101525_ikRVfV9O/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-19-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0074.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002118_TTUQ1b1x1_4101525_ikRVfV9O/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-19-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0074.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-19-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0074.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-19-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0074.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-19-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0074.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-19-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0074.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-19-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0074.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-19-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0074.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-19-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0074.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002118_TTUQ1b1x1_4101525_ikRVfV9O/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-19-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0074.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-19-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0074.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=21, blended=1077, passed=30066
Got 30066 stars (including 28937 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-19-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0074.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 30066 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 880 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 867 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29353 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 880 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29353 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29352 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 880 stars left (next iteration limit 968)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-19-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0074.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-19-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0074.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002118_TTUQ1b1x1_4101525_ikRVfV9O/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-19-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0074.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-19-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0074.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-19-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0074.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.5iUJE58yub (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002118_TTUQ1b1x1_4101525_ikRVfV9O/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002118_TTUQ1b1x1_4101525_ikRVfV9O/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002118_TTUQ1b1x1_4101525_ikRVfV9O/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002118_TTUQ1b1x1_4101525_ikRVfV9O/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002118_TTUQ1b1x1_4101525_ikRVfV9O/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002118_TTUQ1b1x1_4101525_ikRVfV9O/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002118_TTUQ1b1x1_4101525_ikRVfV9O/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002118_TTUQ1b1x1_4101525_ikRVfV9O/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=16, blended=1085, passed=30093
Got 30093 stars (including 28949 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 30093 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 879 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 879 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 867 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 879 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29409 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 879 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 879 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29410 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 879 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29410 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 879 stars left (next iteration limit 966)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002118_TTUQ1b1x1_4101525_ikRVfV9O/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-19-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0074.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002118_TTUQ1b1x1_4101525_ikRVfV9O/wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-19-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0074.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_002118_TTUQ1b1x1_4101525_ikRVfV9O/wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Leo-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 10:16:50.44 +13:43:31.2: 13.10 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 10:10:43.43 +12:29:18.9: 13.39 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 10:47:17.78 +17:11:00.7: 14.30 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 10:13:14.00 +09:41:39.4: 13.60 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 10:42:04.42 +18:15:04.2: 14.61 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 11:12:21.65 +16:15:22.4: 14.18 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 11:06:44.25 +17:42:01.0: 12.26 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 10:12:30.43 +17:24:40.7: 13.45 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 10:58:06.90 +10:40:58.0: 16.02 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 11:06:44.25 +17:42:01.0: 12.30 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 10:13:14.00 +09:41:39.4: 13.52 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 11:12:21.65 +16:15:22.4: 14.23 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 10:42:04.42 +18:15:04.2: 14.64 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 10:10:43.43 +12:29:18.9: 13.46 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 10:16:50.44 +13:43:31.2: 13.14 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 10:47:17.78 +17:11:00.7: 14.16 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.27 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.56 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.62 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.43 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.20 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:06:44.25 +17:42:01.0: ref_mag=12.27 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2649 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.12 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:13:14.00 +09:41:39.4: ref_mag=13.56 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.9127 delta=-0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.23 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:10:43.43 +12:29:18.9: ref_mag=13.43 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4820 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:42:04.42 +18:15:04.2: ref_mag=14.62 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.8294 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:12:21.65 +16:15:22.4: ref_mag=14.20 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.9951 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:16:50.44 +13:43:31.2: ref_mag=13.12 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2449 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:47:17.78 +17:11:00.7: ref_mag=14.23 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.7169 delta=-0.49 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 10:12:30.43 +17:24:40.7: 13.54 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.49 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:12:30.43 +17:24:40.7: ref_mag=13.49 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6488 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 10:58:06.90 +10:40:58.0: 15.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 11:08:43.54 +08:48:15.5: 14.10 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 10:40:48.00 +17:55:16.2: 14.24 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 11:03:34.52 +09:09:10.9: 14.94 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 10:28:32.96 +14:19:16.4: 13.68 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 11:00:59.53 +09:00:56.0: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 11:09:47.84 +08:38:43.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 10:30:39.78 +09:22:56.0: 13.66 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 11:11:05.75 +16:57:35.9: 15.16 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 11:09:47.84 +08:38:43.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:09:47.84 +08:38:43.9: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 11:08:43.54 +08:48:15.5: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:08:43.54 +08:48:15.5: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 10:40:48.00 +17:55:16.2: 14.16 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 10:30:39.78 +09:22:56.0: 13.70 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 11:00:59.53 +09:00:56.0: 15.71 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 11:11:05.75 +16:57:35.9: 14.92 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 11:03:34.52 +09:09:10.9: 14.97 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 10:28:32.96 +14:19:16.4: 13.92 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.20 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.68 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:40:48.00 +17:55:16.2: ref_mag=14.20 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.4855 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.96 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:30:39.78 +09:22:56.0: ref_mag=13.68 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.0346 delta=-0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.03 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:03:34.52 +09:09:10.9: ref_mag=14.96 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.4525 delta=0.50 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.76 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:11:05.75 +16:57:35.9: ref_mag=15.03 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.6580 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:28:32.96 +14:19:16.4: ref_mag=13.76 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.1617 delta=-0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 11:00:06.46 +09:21:11.9: 14.66 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 10:10:55.21 +17:38:14.8: 14.59 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 11:04:41.18 +08:47:18.6: 14.57 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 11:00:06.46 +09:21:11.9: 14.75 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.70 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:00:06.46 +09:21:11.9: ref_mag=14.70 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.3025 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 11:08:01.54 +08:53:03.6: 14.90 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 11:10:03.52 +14:42:59.2: 14.57 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 10:10:18.00 +17:19:55.0: 14.89 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 11:09:29.27 +11:01:58.3: 15.00 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 11:09:23.46 +08:39:31.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 10:10:55.21 +17:38:14.8: 14.52 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.55 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:10:55.21 +17:38:14.8: ref_mag=14.55 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.4889 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 11:09:23.46 +08:39:31.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:09:23.46 +08:39:31.8: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 11:04:41.18 +08:47:18.6: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:04:41.18 +08:47:18.6: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 11:10:03.52 +14:42:59.2: 14.64 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 11:08:01.54 +08:53:03.6: 15.20 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 11:09:29.27 +11:01:58.3: 14.56 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 10:10:18.00 +17:19:55.0: 14.79 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.59 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.99 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:10:03.52 +14:42:59.2: ref_mag=14.59 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.5068 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:08:01.54 +08:53:03.6: ref_mag=14.99 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.5263 delta=0.46 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.74 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:09:29.27 +11:01:58.3: ref_mag=14.74 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.5495 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.83 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:10:18.00 +17:19:55.0: ref_mag=14.83 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.5559 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 11:11:07.37 +13:03:14.7: 14.79 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 11:07:46.06 +08:47:20.1: 15.06 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 11:10:19.44 +13:06:05.6: 14.69 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 11:08:28.72 +09:03:38.4: 15.01 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 11:11:07.37 +13:03:14.7: 15.37 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.92 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:11:07.37 +13:03:14.7: ref_mag=14.92 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.6143 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 11:07:46.06 +08:47:20.1: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:07:46.06 +08:47:20.1: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 11:10:19.44 +13:06:05.6: 15.08 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 10:08:49.70 +14:14:02.2: 14.62 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 11:03:26.07 +08:40:52.5: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.80 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 10:15:10.30 +10:04:08.2: 15.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 11:11:45.23 +14:52:39.5: 14.99 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:10:19.44 +13:06:05.6: ref_mag=14.80 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.6361 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 11:03:26.07 +08:40:52.5: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:03:26.07 +08:40:52.5: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 11:08:28.72 +09:03:38.4: 14.60 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.76 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:08:28.72 +09:03:38.4: ref_mag=14.76 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.5223 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 11:11:45.23 +14:52:39.5: 15.67 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.99 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 10:08:49.70 +14:14:02.2: 14.75 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:11:45.23 +14:52:39.5: ref_mag=14.99 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.8365 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 10:15:10.30 +10:04:08.2: 15.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.68 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:08:49.70 +14:14:02.2: ref_mag=14.68 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.4887 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 11:09:53.27 +09:58:09.5: 14.96 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 11:07:41.45 +08:49:53.1: 14.95 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 11:10:05.91 +09:01:43.0: 15.25 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 11:07:20.37 +10:35:34.4: 14.75 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 10:09:31.39 +15:51:33.0: 15.02 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 11:09:53.27 +09:58:09.5: 15.14 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 11:07:41.45 +08:49:53.1: 14.92 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 11:10:05.91 +09:01:43.0: 15.26 +/- 0.29 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.02 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:09:53.27 +09:58:09.5: ref_mag=15.02 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.6230 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.25 +/- 0.19
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.94 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:10:05.91 +09:01:43.0: ref_mag=15.25 +/- 0.19 new_mean_mag=14.6959 delta=0.56 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:07:41.45 +08:49:53.1: ref_mag=14.94 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.7104 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 11:00:58.14 +11:34:50.8: 15.57 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 11:07:20.37 +10:35:34.4: 14.86 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 11:09:00.50 +09:24:01.1: 14.90 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.79 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:07:20.37 +10:35:34.4: ref_mag=14.79 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.7256 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 10:09:31.39 +15:51:33.0: 15.07 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.04 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:09:31.39 +15:51:33.0: ref_mag=15.04 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.7702 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 11:09:00.50 +09:24:01.1: 14.96 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 11:00:58.14 +11:34:50.8: 15.17 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.92 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:09:00.50 +09:24:01.1: ref_mag=14.92 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.5914 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.32 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:00:58.14 +11:34:50.8: ref_mag=15.32 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.8098 delta=0.51 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 11:07:50.07 +18:23:58.4: 15.11 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 10:50:56.23 +08:45:30.0: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 10:08:58.02 +17:19:14.0: 15.13 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 10:13:38.78 +18:30:52.5: 15.05 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 10:08:50.05 +16:56:57.1: 14.98 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 11:07:50.07 +18:23:58.4: 15.25 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 10:50:56.23 +08:45:30.0: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:50:56.23 +08:45:30.0: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 10:08:58.02 +17:19:14.0: 15.49 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 10:13:38.78 +18:30:52.5: 15.01 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 10:24:09.65 +17:26:06.8: 14.62 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.16 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.26 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:07:50.07 +18:23:58.4: ref_mag=15.16 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.7941 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:08:58.02 +17:19:14.0: ref_mag=15.26 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.9054 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.03 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:13:38.78 +18:30:52.5: ref_mag=15.03 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.7668 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 10:16:02.30 +14:35:23.9: 14.77 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 10:08:50.05 +16:56:57.1: 14.99 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.98 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:08:50.05 +16:56:57.1: ref_mag=14.98 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.7697 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 10:16:02.30 +14:35:23.9: 14.70 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 10:24:09.65 +17:26:06.8: 14.67 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.73 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.64 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:16:02.30 +14:35:23.9: ref_mag=14.73 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.8087 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:24:09.65 +17:26:06.8: ref_mag=14.64 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.7083 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 11:11:37.47 +13:47:44.0: 15.10 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 11:09:38.72 +12:38:01.1: 14.85 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 11:08:18.92 +09:33:32.8: 14.81 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 10:37:25.33 +18:04:03.0: 14.95 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 10:14:32.44 +17:35:32.2: 15.24 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 11:09:38.72 +12:38:01.1: 14.73 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 11:11:37.47 +13:47:44.0: 15.34 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.79 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.18 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:09:38.72 +12:38:01.1: ref_mag=14.79 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.7563 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:11:37.47 +13:47:44.0: ref_mag=15.18 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.8429 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 11:08:18.92 +09:33:32.8: 14.87 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 10:37:25.33 +18:04:03.0: 14.82 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.83 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:08:18.92 +09:33:32.8: ref_mag=14.83 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.7443 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.88 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:37:25.33 +18:04:03.0: ref_mag=14.88 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.8545 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 10:13:23.02 +18:23:45.2: 15.23 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 10:57:34.81 +08:46:02.9: 14.83 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 10:57:34.81 +08:46:02.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:57:34.81 +08:46:02.9: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 10:14:32.44 +17:35:32.2: 15.21 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.22 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:14:32.44 +17:35:32.2: ref_mag=15.22 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.8192 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 10:13:23.02 +18:23:45.2: 14.95 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.06 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:13:23.02 +18:23:45.2: ref_mag=15.06 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.8691 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 11:03:16.92 +10:30:13.0: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 11:11:04.92 +12:36:14.1: 14.74 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 11:08:57.05 +10:10:46.6: 15.35 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 10:11:56.74 +19:05:15.8: 15.22 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 10:11:56.74 +19:05:15.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:11:56.74 +19:05:15.8: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 10:08:22.98 +14:21:08.8: 15.15 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 11:11:04.92 +12:36:14.1: 15.16 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 11:08:57.05 +10:10:46.6: 15.53 +/- 0.32 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 11:03:16.92 +10:30:13.0: 15.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.85 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.41 +/- 0.19
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:11:04.92 +12:36:14.1: ref_mag=14.85 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.7513 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:08:57.05 +10:10:46.6: ref_mag=15.41 +/- 0.19 new_mean_mag=14.7818 delta=0.63 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 10:08:22.98 +14:21:08.8: 15.03 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.09 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:08:22.98 +14:21:08.8: ref_mag=15.09 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.8482 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 10:14:46.55 +17:31:00.1: 15.09 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 10:20:27.46 +11:34:12.1: 15.69 +/- 0.29 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 10:12:07.02 +11:16:50.0: 14.83 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 10:14:46.55 +17:31:00.1: 14.93 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.00 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:14:46.55 +17:31:00.1: ref_mag=15.00 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.8749 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 10:20:27.46 +11:34:12.1: 15.24 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.37 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:20:27.46 +11:34:12.1: ref_mag=15.37 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.8991 delta=0.47 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 10:12:07.02 +11:16:50.0: 14.79 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 10:13:20.60 +10:19:48.9: 14.74 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.81 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:12:07.02 +11:16:50.0: ref_mag=14.81 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.7953 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 10:13:20.60 +10:19:48.9: 14.86 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.79 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:13:20.60 +10:19:48.9: ref_mag=14.79 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.5505 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53278.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53468.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53790.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53904.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 8s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52817_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 52817_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52819_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 52819_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52824_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 52824_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52825_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 52825_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52826_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 52826_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:09:01.90 +09:34:22.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52828_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 52828_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:03:55.63 +15:01:05.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52900_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 52900_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:16:09.36 +15:03:48.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52958_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 52958_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53164_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 53164_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53238_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 53238_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53272_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 53272_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53278_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075
Preparing report for the candidate 53278_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53286_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 53286_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:28:21.56 +15:46:16.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53383_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 53383_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:08:38.57 +11:59:19.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53438_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 53438_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53457_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 53457_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53468_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075
Preparing report for the candidate 53468_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53515_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 53515_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53596_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 53596_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53601_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 53601_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53610_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 53610_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53624_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 53624_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53627_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 53627_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:07:02.88 +12:09:44.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53657_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 53657_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53662_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 53662_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53676_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 53676_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53677_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 53677_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53681_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 53681_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53685_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 53685_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53687_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 53687_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53688_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 53688_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53705_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 53705_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53706_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 53706_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53718_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 53718_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53744_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 53744_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53753_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 53753_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53761_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 53761_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53788_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 53788_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53790_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075
Preparing report for the candidate 53790_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53796_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 53796_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53801_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 53801_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53804_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 53804_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53805_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 53805_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53823_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 53823_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53828_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 53828_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53834_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 53834_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53842_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 53842_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53843_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 53843_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53844_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 53844_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53846_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 53846_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53855_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 53855_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53860_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 53860_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53861_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 53861_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53867_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 53867_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53868_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 53868_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53869_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 53869_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53881_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 53881_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53893_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 53893_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53895_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 53895_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53896_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 53896_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53904_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075
Preparing report for the candidate 53904_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53906_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 53906_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53909_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 53909_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53918_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 53918_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53929_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 53929_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53938_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 53938_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:08:42.83 +10:01:51.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53939_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 53939_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54025_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 54025_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54062_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 54062_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54082_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 54082_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_00-20-21_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks