Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 05 07.2063  2461167.7063  13.01  09:55:40.38 +15:51:30.4
219.14221  47.82094 galactic  Leo  Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.7" and 1.5 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
103 Hera                    -2      1       3  13.1     0   -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 09:55:40.38 +15:51:30.4:  16.13 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits at 09:55:40.38 +15:51:30.4:  16.12 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits


fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-55-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits


fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits

# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_000028_TTUQ2b1x1_3150094_2sp3errB/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-55-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_000028_TTUQ2b1x1_3150094_2sp3errB/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i ;done
# Display the solved FITS images
ds9 -frame lock wcs  wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits  wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-55-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits -crosshair 3413.51367 2092.85498 image    wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits -crosshair 3414.83594 2092.20947 image   

./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_000028_TTUQ2b1x1_3150094_2sp3errB/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-55-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_000028_TTUQ2b1x1_3150094_2sp3errB/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits  && util/transients/search_for_transients_single_field.sh

REFERENCE_IMAGES=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs  util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_000028_TTUQ2b1x1_3150094_2sp3errB

Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code! The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter. Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code. The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:

     TAU0008  C2026 05 07.20627 09 55 40.38 +15 51 30.4          13.0 R      V36

Position measured on individual images:

     TAU0008  C2026 05 07.20507 09 55 40.32 +15 51 30.6          13.0 R      V36
     TAU0008  C2026 05 07.20747 09 55 40.44 +15 51 30.3          13.0 R      V36

You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services:
MPChecker (in case the button does not work)
NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets)
sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work)
fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)

Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP. Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!

TCP 2026 05 07.2063*  09 55 40.38 +15 51 30.4  13.0 U             Leo       9 0

Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!

 **** AAVSO file format ****

#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461167.7063,13.01,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS


 **** VSNET file format ****

# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829   <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746    12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732    12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260507.2063 13.01CV NMW


The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs

The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to  vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp

Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 05 07.2063  2461167.7063  13.70  09:42:46.86 +15:52:47.5
217.36428  44.97327 galactic  Leo  Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.3" and 1.0 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
47 Aglaja                  -3      1       3  14.0    -0    0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 09:42:46.86 +15:52:47.5:  16.17 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits at 09:42:46.86 +15:52:47.5:  16.16 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits


fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-55-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits


fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits

# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_000028_TTUQ2b1x1_3150094_2sp3errB/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-55-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_000028_TTUQ2b1x1_3150094_2sp3errB/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i ;done
# Display the solved FITS images
ds9 -frame lock wcs  wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits  wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-55-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits -crosshair 5288.29346 2052.58618 image    wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits -crosshair 5289.10693 2051.97266 image   

./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_000028_TTUQ2b1x1_3150094_2sp3errB/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-55-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_000028_TTUQ2b1x1_3150094_2sp3errB/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits  && util/transients/search_for_transients_single_field.sh

REFERENCE_IMAGES=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs  util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_000028_TTUQ2b1x1_3150094_2sp3errB

Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code! The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter. Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code. The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:

     TAU0008  C2026 05 07.20627 09 42 46.86 +15 52 47.5          13.7 R      V36

Position measured on individual images:

     TAU0008  C2026 05 07.20507 09 42 46.79 +15 52 47.5          13.7 R      V36
     TAU0008  C2026 05 07.20747 09 42 46.94 +15 52 47.4          13.7 R      V36

You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services:
MPChecker (in case the button does not work)
NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets)
sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work)
fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)

Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP. Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!

TCP 2026 05 07.2063*  09 42 46.86 +15 52 47.5  13.7 U             Leo       9 0

Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!

 **** AAVSO file format ****

#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461167.7063,13.70,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS


 **** VSNET file format ****

# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829   <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746    12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732    12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260507.2063 13.70CV NMW


The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs

The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to  vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp

Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 05 07.2063  2461167.7063  14.51  09:33:22.75 +11:40:55.2
221.31136  41.16168 galactic  Leo  Second-epoch detections are separated by 8.1" and 1.4 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
 online_id        | target                       | 09:33:22.75 +11:40:55.2 (user input)  | T                | P                    |  (position from user input)                                                  
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 09:33:22.75 +11:40:55.2:  16.03 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits at 09:33:22.75 +11:40:55.2:  16.01 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits


fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-55-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits


fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits

# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_000028_TTUQ2b1x1_3150094_2sp3errB/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-55-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_000028_TTUQ2b1x1_3150094_2sp3errB/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i ;done
# Display the solved FITS images
ds9 -frame lock wcs  wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits  wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-55-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits -crosshair 6736.62939 4554.93164 image    wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits -crosshair 6737.98047 4554.98926 image   

./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_000028_TTUQ2b1x1_3150094_2sp3errB/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-55-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_000028_TTUQ2b1x1_3150094_2sp3errB/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits  && util/transients/search_for_transients_single_field.sh

REFERENCE_IMAGES=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs  util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_000028_TTUQ2b1x1_3150094_2sp3errB

Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code! The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter. Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code. The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:

     TAU0008  C2026 05 07.20627 09 33 22.75 +11 40 55.2          14.5 R      V36

Position measured on individual images:

     TAU0008  C2026 05 07.20507 09 33 22.83 +11 40 59.1          14.6 R      V36
     TAU0008  C2026 05 07.20747 09 33 22.67 +11 40 51.3          14.4 R      V36

You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services:
MPChecker (in case the button does not work)
NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets)
sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work)
fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)

Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP. Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!

TCP 2026 05 07.2063*  09 33 22.75 +11 40 55.2  14.5 U             Leo       9 0

Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!

 **** AAVSO file format ****

#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461167.7063,14.51,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS


 **** VSNET file format ****

# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829   <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746    12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732    12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260507.2063 14.51CV NMW


The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs

The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to  vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp

## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref.  image: 2461119.68287475 20.03.2026 04:23:10.378   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
First image: 2461119.68287475 20.03.2026 04:23:10.378   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Last  image: 2461167.70747086 07.05.2026 04:58:35.482   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_000028_TTUQ2b1x1_3150094_2sp3errB/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 0
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.63
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA  10.0             # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH   10.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL     55000.0         # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN            0.37            # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times):  5202
Objects passed selection criteria:  5202
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.5    4.0    2    4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.5    4.0    2    4
Average stars detected per image: 5195.5
Average stars matched: 4754.5 (91.5119 %)
Memory usage VmPeak:   112216 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on  Wed May  6 12:14:36 CDT 2026
VaST build number  1.0rc89-43-g0c21e0c3
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on  Thu May  7 00:03:33 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref.  image: 2461119.68287475 20.03.2026 04:23:10.378   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
First image: 2461119.68287475 20.03.2026 04:23:10.378   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Last  image: 2461167.70747086 07.05.2026 04:58:35.482   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_000028_TTUQ2b1x1_3150094_2sp3errB/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 113
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.34
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 10 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA  2.0             # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH   3.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL     57000.0         # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN            0.83            # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times):  29991
Objects passed selection criteria:  29907
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.4    4.0    2    4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.4    4.0    2    4
Average stars detected per image: 29087.2
Average stars matched: 26428.5 (90.8594 %)
Memory usage VmPeak:   136244 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on  Wed May  6 12:14:36 CDT 2026
VaST build number  1.0rc89-43-g0c21e0c3
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on  Thu May  7 00:04:42 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ2b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.0
FLAT_FIELD_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-04-22_multinight.fit
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 600
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 8000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 4000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 4
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
Leo-04-Q2b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Leo-04-Q2b1x1 ###########
Processing Leo-04-Q2b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 814229 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 814229 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 

Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:

MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes


renamed 'Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-55-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0079.png' -> 'transient_report/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-55-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits_preview.png'

Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-55-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits


renamed 'Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080.png' -> 'transient_report/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits_preview.png'

Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits




Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK
Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK
Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK
Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold.
----------------------------------------------
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 560.5437
INFO:         REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 523.0623
INFO:    SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1120.6050
INFO:            SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 491.3561
INFO:   SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1122.4516
INFO:           SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 495.8262
----------------------------------------------
INFO:      ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 1.99914
INFO:                  SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.009
----------------------------------------------
Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-04-22_multinight.fit
EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP=                 -5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP=                 -5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP =     13.0900001525879 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP =                 13.6 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_000028_TTUQ2b1x1_3150094_2sp3errB/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-55-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits 
CCD-TEMP= -5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_000028_TTUQ2b1x1_3150094_2sp3errB/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-55-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits
SET-TEMP= -5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_000028_TTUQ2b1x1_3150094_2sp3errB/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-55-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE  =                    T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX  =                   16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS   =                    2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1  =                 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2  =                 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO   =                32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND  =                    T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT'              / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE=                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-05-06T23:55:08.2150312' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-05-07T04:55:08.2150312' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS =     61167.2049561921 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-05-07T04:55:18.1198549' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG =     61167.2050708216 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING=                    1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING=                    1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN    =                   30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET  =                   30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M'            / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP=                 -5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP=                 -5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0'             / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT=                   50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2'       / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN=                135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO=                  2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA      =     146.664623134023 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC     =     14.0000975001673 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT =     40.7497222222222 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ  =     258.759722222222 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS =     1.52997712818371 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East'               / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV=               1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT =           33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG=          -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky'         / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview'        / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= ''                   / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL  = 'Simulator'          / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER  = 'CV'                 / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT  = 'Leo-04'             / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '09 46 40'           / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+14 00 00'          / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT=                  0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser'        / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS  =                20369 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS=                20369 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ =                  0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP =     13.0900001525879 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM=     13.0900001525879 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT=                  3.1 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY=                 49.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE=                902.3 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP =                 13.6 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR =                277.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST=            25.602048 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD =            17.301384 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN'           / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX =               2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP =            20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP  =              13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP  =           20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL =               6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF =             235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET =           20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM =                    T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0=             3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_000028_TTUQ2b1x1_3150094_2sp3errB/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-55-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= -5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_000028_TTUQ2b1x1_3150094_2sp3errB/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-55-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits
SET-TEMP= -5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-22.fit
CCD-TEMP= -5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_000028_TTUQ2b1x1_3150094_2sp3errB/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-55-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits
CCD-TEMP= -5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-22.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-22.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_000028_TTUQ2b1x1_3150094_2sp3errB/d_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-55-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits :)

Spent 0.517636 seconds 
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-22.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_000028_TTUQ2b1x1_3150094_2sp3errB/d_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-55-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-04-22_multinight.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 42267.109959
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_000028_TTUQ2b1x1_3150094_2sp3errB/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-55-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits :)


No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=27349.0, right_median=33499.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-04-22_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_000028_TTUQ2b1x1_3150094_2sp3errB/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-55-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits
EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP=                 -5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP=                 -5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP =     12.9200000762939 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP =                 13.4 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_000028_TTUQ2b1x1_3150094_2sp3errB/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits 
CCD-TEMP= -5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_000028_TTUQ2b1x1_3150094_2sp3errB/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits
SET-TEMP= -5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_000028_TTUQ2b1x1_3150094_2sp3errB/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE  =                    T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX  =                   16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS   =                    2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1  =                 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2  =                 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO   =                32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND  =                    T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT'              / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE=                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-05-06T23:58:35.4828740' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-05-07T04:58:35.4828740' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS =     61167.2073551156 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-05-07T04:58:45.3844199' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG =     61167.2074697223 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING=                    1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING=                    1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN    =                   30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET  =                   30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M'            / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP=                 -5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP=                 -5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0'             / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT=                   50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2'       / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN=                135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO=                  2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA      =     146.664623210797 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC     =     14.0000974713565 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT =     40.0469444444444 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ  =     259.353611111111 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS =     1.55209083300931 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East'               / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV=               1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT =           33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG=          -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky'         / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview'        / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= ''                   / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL  = 'Simulator'          / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER  = 'CV'                 / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT  = 'Leo-04'             / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '09 46 40'           / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+14 00 00'          / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT=                  0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser'        / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS  =                20431 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS=                20431 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ =                  0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP =     12.9200000762939 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM=     12.9200000762939 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT=                  2.9 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY=                 49.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE=                902.4 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP =                 13.4 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR =                253.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST=            23.801904 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD =            17.301384 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN'           / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX =               2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP =            20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP  =              13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP  =           20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL =               6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF =             235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET =           20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM =                    T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0=             3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_000028_TTUQ2b1x1_3150094_2sp3errB/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= -5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_000028_TTUQ2b1x1_3150094_2sp3errB/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits
SET-TEMP= -5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-22.fit
CCD-TEMP= -5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_000028_TTUQ2b1x1_3150094_2sp3errB/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits
CCD-TEMP= -5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-22.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-22.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_000028_TTUQ2b1x1_3150094_2sp3errB/d_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits :)

Spent 0.522032 seconds 
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-22.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_000028_TTUQ2b1x1_3150094_2sp3errB/d_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-04-22_multinight.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 42267.109959
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_000028_TTUQ2b1x1_3150094_2sp3errB/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits :)


No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=27349.0, right_median=33499.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-04-22_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_000028_TTUQ2b1x1_3150094_2sp3errB/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits
Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:



Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:



after the calibration attempt:
SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_000028_TTUQ2b1x1_3150094_2sp3errB/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-55-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits
SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_000028_TTUQ2b1x1_3150094_2sp3errB/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits
Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:


fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-55-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits



fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits




Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1

  ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_000028_TTUQ2b1x1_3150094_2sp3errB/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-55-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_000028_TTUQ2b1x1_3150094_2sp3errB/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits
  
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_000028_TTUQ2b1x1_3150094_2sp3errB/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-55-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_000028_TTUQ2b1x1_3150094_2sp3errB/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461167.70507193
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits'
wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits'
wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-55-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-55-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-55-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-55-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits'
wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.1'  15.6(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:46:31.742 +14:00:33.63 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-55-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-55-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.0'  15.6(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:46:21.236 +14:00:26.04 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 09:46:31.742 +14:00:33.63
Second-epoch image center 09:46:21.236 +14:00:26.04
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0425 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg.  Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.1'  15.6(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:46:21.708 +14:00:20.24 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 09:46:31.742 +14:00:33.63
Second-epoch image center 09:46:21.708 +14:00:20.24
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0407 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center  09:46:21.236 +14:00:26.04
Second-epoch second image center 09:46:21.708 +14:00:20.24
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00250 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits &> /tmp/tmp.8OZ4GMaNQ4
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Z3WoQHgaWD
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_000028_TTUQ2b1x1_3150094_2sp3errB/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-55-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits &> /tmp/tmp.4hCnxtNTve
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_000028_TTUQ2b1x1_3150094_2sp3errB/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-55-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_000028_TTUQ2b1x1_3150094_2sp3errB/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits &> /tmp/tmp.AIC7OBZORe
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_000028_TTUQ2b1x1_3150094_2sp3errB/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits and wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat 
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits and wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat 
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits and wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits) and catalog (wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 7795 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 138.4789 to 154.9675 deg, Dec +8.5563 to +19.3047 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 138.4789 to 154.9675 deg, Dec 8.5563 to 19.3047 deg
Loaded 4793 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3886 out of 4074 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4074 out of 7795 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.915650
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.915650
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.63
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.29

Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed!  =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.29

Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:


Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 7795 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 138.4789 to 154.9675 deg, Dec +8.5563 to +19.3047 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 138.4789 to 154.9675 deg, Dec 8.5563 to 19.3047 deg
Loaded 4793 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3886 out of 4074 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4074 out of 7795 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits (aperture=6.6)
Read 7228 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 138.4295 to 155.2660 deg, Dec +8.1771 to +19.5842 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 138.4295 to 155.2660 deg, Dec 8.1771 to 19.5842 deg
Loaded 5215 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3899 out of 4084 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4084 out of 7228 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering.  (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
 2.4 pix  Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
 2.1 pix  Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
 2.7 pix  fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-55-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits
 2.6 pix  fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits
 2.4 pix  wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
 2.1 pix  wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
 15.3 mag.  Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
 15.3 mag.  Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
 14.8 mag.  fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-55-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits
 14.9 mag.  fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate:  14.8 (SNR )  12.0 (80% of stars)  with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of  following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). 
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. 
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.8OZ4GMaNQ4 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_000028_TTUQ2b1x1_3150094_2sp3errB/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=485, passed=7795
Got 7795 stars (including 7304 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7795 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 906 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 883 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7515 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 906 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7517 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7517 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44" 
Excluding outliers - 906 stars left (next iteration limit 996)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits -region wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Z3WoQHgaWD (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_000028_TTUQ2b1x1_3150094_2sp3errB/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.cat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=490, passed=7228
Got 7228 stars (including 6724 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.cat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7228 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 490 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 912 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 897 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6991 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 490 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 912 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6991 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6991 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" 
Excluding outliers - 912 stars left (next iteration limit 1003)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits -region wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.4hCnxtNTve (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_000028_TTUQ2b1x1_3150094_2sp3errB/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_000028_TTUQ2b1x1_3150094_2sp3errB/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-55-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_000028_TTUQ2b1x1_3150094_2sp3errB/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-55-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_000028_TTUQ2b1x1_3150094_2sp3errB/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-55-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_000028_TTUQ2b1x1_3150094_2sp3errB/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-55-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_000028_TTUQ2b1x1_3150094_2sp3errB/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-55-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_000028_TTUQ2b1x1_3150094_2sp3errB/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-55-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-55-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-55-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-55-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-55-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-55-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-55-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-55-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_000028_TTUQ2b1x1_3150094_2sp3errB/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-55-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-55-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits.cat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=444, passed=6125
Got 6125 stars (including 5678 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-55-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits.cat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6125 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 909 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 890 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5975 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 909 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5973 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5973 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51" 
Excluding outliers - 909 stars left (next iteration limit 999)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-55-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-55-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_000028_TTUQ2b1x1_3150094_2sp3errB/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-55-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-55-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-55-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.AIC7OBZORe (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_000028_TTUQ2b1x1_3150094_2sp3errB/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_000028_TTUQ2b1x1_3150094_2sp3errB/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_000028_TTUQ2b1x1_3150094_2sp3errB/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_000028_TTUQ2b1x1_3150094_2sp3errB/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_000028_TTUQ2b1x1_3150094_2sp3errB/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_000028_TTUQ2b1x1_3150094_2sp3errB/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_000028_TTUQ2b1x1_3150094_2sp3errB/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_000028_TTUQ2b1x1_3150094_2sp3errB/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits.cat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=320, passed=6123
Got 6123 stars (including 5799 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits.cat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6123 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 910 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 893 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6014 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 910 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6014 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6014 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46" 
Excluding outliers - 910 stars left (next iteration limit 1001)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_000028_TTUQ2b1x1_3150094_2sp3errB/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-55-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-55-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_000028_TTUQ2b1x1_3150094_2sp3errB/wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-55-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_000028_TTUQ2b1x1_3150094_2sp3errB/wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Leo-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
No candidates found here
Prepared the HTML report for the field Leo-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL

  ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_000028_TTUQ2b1x1_3150094_2sp3errB/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-55-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_000028_TTUQ2b1x1_3150094_2sp3errB/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits
  
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_000028_TTUQ2b1x1_3150094_2sp3errB/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-55-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_000028_TTUQ2b1x1_3150094_2sp3errB/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-55-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-55-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.1'  15.6(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:46:31.742 +14:00:33.63 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-55-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-55-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.0'  15.6(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:46:21.236 +14:00:26.04 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 09:46:31.742 +14:00:33.63
Second-epoch image center 09:46:21.236 +14:00:26.04
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0425 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg.  Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.1'  15.6(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:46:21.708 +14:00:20.24 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 09:46:31.742 +14:00:33.63
Second-epoch image center 09:46:21.708 +14:00:20.24
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0407 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center  09:46:21.236 +14:00:26.04
Second-epoch second image center 09:46:21.708 +14:00:20.24
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00250 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits &> /tmp/tmp.brGrarQuHQ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits &> /tmp/tmp.BDPSfQGUjX
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_000028_TTUQ2b1x1_3150094_2sp3errB/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-55-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits &> /tmp/tmp.gklLJ0R4lf
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_000028_TTUQ2b1x1_3150094_2sp3errB/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-55-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_000028_TTUQ2b1x1_3150094_2sp3errB/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits &> /tmp/tmp.6VNCSmkdHH
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_000028_TTUQ2b1x1_3150094_2sp3errB/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits and wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat 
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits and wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat 
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits and wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits) and catalog (wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 41224 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 138.4723 to 154.9674 deg, Dec +8.5474 to +19.3051 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 138.4723 to 154.9674 deg, Dec 8.5474 to 19.3051 deg
Loaded 4805 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3684 out of 4105 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4105 out of 41224 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.791850
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.791850
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.34
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.45

Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed!  =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.45

Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:


Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 41224 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 138.4723 to 154.9674 deg, Dec +8.5474 to +19.3051 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 138.4723 to 154.9674 deg, Dec 8.5474 to 19.3051 deg
Loaded 4805 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3684 out of 4105 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4105 out of 41224 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits (aperture=5.1)
Read 42226 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 138.3858 to 155.2947 deg, Dec +8.1221 to +19.5907 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 138.3858 to 155.2947 deg, Dec 8.1221 to 19.5907 deg
Loaded 5272 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3734 out of 4128 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4128 out of 42226 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits (aperture=4.8)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 73 candidate transients before the final filtering.  (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
 2.2 pix  Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
 2.0 pix  Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
 2.5 pix  fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-55-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits
 2.3 pix  fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits
 2.2 pix  wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
 2.0 pix  wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
 15.5 mag.  Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
 15.4 mag.  Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
 14.9 mag.  fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-55-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits
 15.1 mag.  fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate:  14.9 (SNR )  14.4 (80% of stars)  with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of  following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). 
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. 
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.brGrarQuHQ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_000028_TTUQ2b1x1_3150094_2sp3errB/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=22, blended=1984, passed=41202
Got 41202 stars (including 39163 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 41202 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 904 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 879 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39941 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 904 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39939 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39938 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45" 
Excluding outliers - 904 stars left (next iteration limit 994)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits -region wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.BDPSfQGUjX (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_000028_TTUQ2b1x1_3150094_2sp3errB/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.cat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=16, blended=1796, passed=42210
Got 42210 stars (including 40354 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.cat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 42210 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 490 to 549 (Dec 8.1 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 911 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 899 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41062 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 490 to 549 (Dec 8.1 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 911 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41060 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41060 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" 
Excluding outliers - 911 stars left (next iteration limit 1002)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits -region wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.gklLJ0R4lf (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_000028_TTUQ2b1x1_3150094_2sp3errB/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_000028_TTUQ2b1x1_3150094_2sp3errB/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-55-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_000028_TTUQ2b1x1_3150094_2sp3errB/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-55-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_000028_TTUQ2b1x1_3150094_2sp3errB/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-55-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_000028_TTUQ2b1x1_3150094_2sp3errB/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-55-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_000028_TTUQ2b1x1_3150094_2sp3errB/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-55-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_000028_TTUQ2b1x1_3150094_2sp3errB/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-55-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-55-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-55-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-55-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-55-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-55-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-55-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-55-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_000028_TTUQ2b1x1_3150094_2sp3errB/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-55-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-55-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits.cat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=2150, passed=29028
Got 29028 stars (including 26861 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-55-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits.cat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 29028 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 908 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 877 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28192 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 908 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28192 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28192 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46" 
Excluding outliers - 908 stars left (next iteration limit 998)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-55-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-55-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_000028_TTUQ2b1x1_3150094_2sp3errB/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-55-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-55-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-55-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.6VNCSmkdHH (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_000028_TTUQ2b1x1_3150094_2sp3errB/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_000028_TTUQ2b1x1_3150094_2sp3errB/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_000028_TTUQ2b1x1_3150094_2sp3errB/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_000028_TTUQ2b1x1_3150094_2sp3errB/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_000028_TTUQ2b1x1_3150094_2sp3errB/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_000028_TTUQ2b1x1_3150094_2sp3errB/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_000028_TTUQ2b1x1_3150094_2sp3errB/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_000028_TTUQ2b1x1_3150094_2sp3errB/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits.cat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=14, blended=1441, passed=33120
Got 33120 stars (including 31650 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits.cat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 33120 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 910 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 884 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32522 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 910 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32521 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32521 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47" 
Excluding outliers - 910 stars left (next iteration limit 1001)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_000028_TTUQ2b1x1_3150094_2sp3errB/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-55-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_000028_TTUQ2b1x1_3150094_2sp3errB/wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-55-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_000028_TTUQ2b1x1_3150094_2sp3errB/wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Leo-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 09:55:40.38 +15:51:30.4:  16.13 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 09:50:12.89 +16:47:37.5:  14.26 +/- 0.07  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits at 09:50:12.89 +16:47:37.5:  14.15 +/- 0.06  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.20 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:50:12.89 +16:47:37.5: ref_mag=14.20 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.1294 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits at 09:55:40.38 +15:51:30.4:  16.12 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 09:42:46.86 +15:52:47.5:  16.17 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits at 09:42:46.86 +15:52:47.5:  16.16 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 09:33:22.75 +11:40:55.2:  16.03 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits at 09:33:22.75 +11:40:55.2:  16.01 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out59744.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out59880.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out60258.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 16s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59566_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080
The candidate 59566_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 05 07.20507    2461167.70507    14.07    09:50:12.86 +16:47:38.1   4200 1518   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_000028_TTUQ2b1x1_3150094_2sp3errB/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-55-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 05 07.20747    2461167.70747    14.18    09:50:12.92 +16:47:36.9   4201 1518   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_000028_TTUQ2b1x1_3150094_2sp3errB/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59644_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080
The candidate 59644_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 07.20747    2461167.70747    12.02    09:30:07.06 +16:37:16.1   7119 1546   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_000028_TTUQ2b1x1_3150094_2sp3errB/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59661_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080
The candidate 59661_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 07.20747    2461167.70747    12.28    09:48:45.28 +16:46:19.2   4413 1528   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_000028_TTUQ2b1x1_3150094_2sp3errB/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59676_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080
The candidate 59676_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 07.20747    2461167.70747    12.28    09:46:27.14 +14:10:12.1   4774 3096   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_000028_TTUQ2b1x1_3150094_2sp3errB/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59679_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080
The candidate 59679_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 07.20747    2461167.70747    12.26    09:52:41.28 +10:31:40.6   3885 5314   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_000028_TTUQ2b1x1_3150094_2sp3errB/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.8") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59730_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080
The candidate 59730_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 07.20747    2461167.70747    12.93    09:37:07.32 +13:32:02.3   6151 3449   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_000028_TTUQ2b1x1_3150094_2sp3errB/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59744_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080
Preparing report for the candidate 59744_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59751_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080
The candidate 59751_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 07.20747    2461167.70747    12.95    10:00:07.09 +10:05:53.8   2777 5588   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_000028_TTUQ2b1x1_3150094_2sp3errB/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59752_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080
The candidate 59752_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 07.20747    2461167.70747    13.07    09:39:39.45 +17:53:09.1   5714 0824   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_000028_TTUQ2b1x1_3150094_2sp3errB/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59761_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080
The candidate 59761_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 07.20747    2461167.70747    12.98    10:01:46.83 +14:34:16.4   2525 2875   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_000028_TTUQ2b1x1_3150094_2sp3errB/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59772_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080
The candidate 59772_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 07.20747    2461167.70747    13.04    09:55:51.91 +13:58:58.8   3396 3227   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_000028_TTUQ2b1x1_3150094_2sp3errB/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59795_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080
The candidate 59795_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 07.20747    2461167.70747    13.22    09:28:37.60 +13:47:19.1   7398 3255   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_000028_TTUQ2b1x1_3150094_2sp3errB/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59805_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080
The candidate 59805_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 07.20747    2461167.70747    13.36    09:57:39.75 +11:54:17.0   3139 4487   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_000028_TTUQ2b1x1_3150094_2sp3errB/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59808_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080
The candidate 59808_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 07.20747    2461167.70747    13.45    09:31:51.80 +14:52:18.4   6899 2616   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_000028_TTUQ2b1x1_3150094_2sp3errB/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59810_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080
The candidate 59810_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 07.20747    2461167.70747    13.46    09:35:22.48 +12:45:17.2   6422 3913   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_000028_TTUQ2b1x1_3150094_2sp3errB/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59820_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080
The candidate 59820_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 07.20747    2461167.70747    13.27    09:51:03.14 +09:56:53.8   4133 5663   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_000028_TTUQ2b1x1_3150094_2sp3errB/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59829_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080
The candidate 59829_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 07.20747    2461167.70747    13.68    10:04:50.38 +17:50:52.7   2076 0882   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_000028_TTUQ2b1x1_3150094_2sp3errB/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59836_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080
The candidate 59836_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 07.20747    2461167.70747    13.33    09:53:26.64 +13:43:51.5   3753 3376   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_000028_TTUQ2b1x1_3150094_2sp3errB/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59837_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080
The candidate 59837_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 07.20747    2461167.70747    13.35    09:53:57.71 +10:23:49.9   3696 5396   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_000028_TTUQ2b1x1_3150094_2sp3errB/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59852_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080
The candidate 59852_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 07.20747    2461167.70747    13.49    09:53:52.77 +10:58:17.6   3705 5047   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_000028_TTUQ2b1x1_3150094_2sp3errB/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.7") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59856_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080
The candidate 59856_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 07.20747    2461167.70747    13.63    10:03:43.74 +13:33:30.8   2238 3489   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_000028_TTUQ2b1x1_3150094_2sp3errB/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59859_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080
The candidate 59859_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 07.20747    2461167.70747    13.58    09:31:39.02 +14:19:53.5   6941 2942   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_000028_TTUQ2b1x1_3150094_2sp3errB/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59861_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080
The candidate 59861_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 07.20747    2461167.70747    13.53    09:48:49.63 +10:03:17.1   4464 5593   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_000028_TTUQ2b1x1_3150094_2sp3errB/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59871_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080
The candidate 59871_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 07.20747    2461167.70747    13.83    09:56:17.99 +14:29:11.5   3330 2923   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_000028_TTUQ2b1x1_3150094_2sp3errB/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59872_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080
The candidate 59872_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 07.20747    2461167.70747    13.55    09:52:36.37 +14:36:38.6   3870 2843   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_000028_TTUQ2b1x1_3150094_2sp3errB/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.7") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59874_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080
The candidate 59874_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 07.20747    2461167.70747    13.85    09:42:29.17 +16:39:33.8   5322 1579   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_000028_TTUQ2b1x1_3150094_2sp3errB/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59875_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080
The candidate 59875_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 07.20747    2461167.70747    13.57    10:03:11.88 +15:59:20.3   2316 2015   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_000028_TTUQ2b1x1_3150094_2sp3errB/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59877_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080
The candidate 59877_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 07.20747    2461167.70747    13.85    09:31:13.55 +17:33:38.8   6939 0981   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_000028_TTUQ2b1x1_3150094_2sp3errB/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59880_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080
Preparing report for the candidate 59880_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59883_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080
The candidate 59883_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 07.20747    2461167.70747    13.73    09:34:33.06 +15:49:24.7   6488 2053   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_000028_TTUQ2b1x1_3150094_2sp3errB/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59889_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080
The candidate 59889_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 07.20747    2461167.70747    13.89    09:33:51.85 +17:48:57.4   6552 0840   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_000028_TTUQ2b1x1_3150094_2sp3errB/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59896_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080
The candidate 59896_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 07.20747    2461167.70747    13.77    10:02:24.70 +12:55:28.6   2433 3873   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_000028_TTUQ2b1x1_3150094_2sp3errB/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59899_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080
The candidate 59899_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 07.20747    2461167.70747    13.82    09:54:16.49 +09:53:54.9   3652 5700   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_000028_TTUQ2b1x1_3150094_2sp3errB/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59907_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080
The candidate 59907_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 07.20747    2461167.70747    13.64    09:45:19.63 +11:20:39.6   4971 4801   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_000028_TTUQ2b1x1_3150094_2sp3errB/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59910_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080
The candidate 59910_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 07.20747    2461167.70747    14.00    10:03:41.80 +11:01:38.1   2241 5026   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_000028_TTUQ2b1x1_3150094_2sp3errB/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59920_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080
The candidate 59920_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 07.20747    2461167.70747    14.08    09:56:11.46 +17:48:00.1   3330 0914   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_000028_TTUQ2b1x1_3150094_2sp3errB/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59933_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080
The candidate 59933_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 07.20747    2461167.70747    14.04    10:03:13.32 +14:12:36.3   2313 3094   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_000028_TTUQ2b1x1_3150094_2sp3errB/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.8") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59937_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080
The candidate 59937_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 07.20747    2461167.70747    13.86    09:37:28.03 +12:16:52.2   6121 4208   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_000028_TTUQ2b1x1_3150094_2sp3errB/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59938_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080
The candidate 59938_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 07.20747    2461167.70747    13.98    09:30:48.02 +17:14:58.2   7007 1168   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_000028_TTUQ2b1x1_3150094_2sp3errB/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59946_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080
The candidate 59946_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 07.20747    2461167.70747    13.65    09:45:22.06 +10:13:09.9   4978 5484   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_000028_TTUQ2b1x1_3150094_2sp3errB/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits

**** FOUND  09:45:22.06 +10:13:09.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59947_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080
The candidate 59947_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 07.20747    2461167.70747    14.07    09:45:54.71 +14:32:42.8   4849 2868   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_000028_TTUQ2b1x1_3150094_2sp3errB/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59950_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080
The candidate 59950_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 07.20747    2461167.70747    14.04    09:36:17.87 +12:57:57.9   6282 3789   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_000028_TTUQ2b1x1_3150094_2sp3errB/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59954_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080
The candidate 59954_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 07.20747    2461167.70747    14.27    09:36:41.25 +14:14:33.2   6203 3019   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_000028_TTUQ2b1x1_3150094_2sp3errB/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59959_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080
The candidate 59959_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 07.20747    2461167.70747    13.91    09:35:21.98 +14:13:53.2   6397 3020   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_000028_TTUQ2b1x1_3150094_2sp3errB/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59962_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080
The candidate 59962_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 07.20747    2461167.70747    14.02    09:29:15.93 +11:27:20.4   7355 4673   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_000028_TTUQ2b1x1_3150094_2sp3errB/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (8.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59972_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080
The candidate 59972_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 07.20747    2461167.70747    14.11    09:57:25.48 +18:09:24.9   3150 0697   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_000028_TTUQ2b1x1_3150094_2sp3errB/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59984_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080
The candidate 59984_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 07.20747    2461167.70747    14.33    09:57:30.03 +17:56:13.7   3140 0831   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_000028_TTUQ2b1x1_3150094_2sp3errB/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 60001_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080
The candidate 60001_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 07.20747    2461167.70747    14.35    09:27:38.36 +17:01:03.9   7472 1290   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_000028_TTUQ2b1x1_3150094_2sp3errB/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 60008_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080
The candidate 60008_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 07.20747    2461167.70747    14.06    09:51:25.48 +10:24:48.2   4074 5381   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_000028_TTUQ2b1x1_3150094_2sp3errB/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 60011_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080
The candidate 60011_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 07.20747    2461167.70747    14.29    09:37:32.07 +10:04:45.0   6148 5544   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_000028_TTUQ2b1x1_3150094_2sp3errB/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 60019_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080
The candidate 60019_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 07.20747    2461167.70747    14.36    09:53:35.75 +13:30:58.6   3732 3506   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_000028_TTUQ2b1x1_3150094_2sp3errB/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 60028_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080
The candidate 60028_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 07.20747    2461167.70747    14.32    09:59:23.38 +13:30:33.7   2879 3517   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_000028_TTUQ2b1x1_3150094_2sp3errB/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 60041_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080
The candidate 60041_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 07.20747    2461167.70747    14.34    10:02:50.53 +15:58:34.0   2368 2023   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_000028_TTUQ2b1x1_3150094_2sp3errB/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 60043_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080
The candidate 60043_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 07.20747    2461167.70747    14.48    09:39:52.50 +16:57:43.9   5696 1386   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_000028_TTUQ2b1x1_3150094_2sp3errB/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 60048_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080
The candidate 60048_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 07.20747    2461167.70747    14.04    09:37:43.33 +10:00:58.3   6121 5583   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_000028_TTUQ2b1x1_3150094_2sp3errB/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 60067_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080
The candidate 60067_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 07.20747    2461167.70747    14.45    09:59:14.34 +12:45:57.2   2903 3967   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_000028_TTUQ2b1x1_3150094_2sp3errB/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.8") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 60077_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080
The candidate 60077_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 07.20747    2461167.70747    14.52    10:04:07.58 +16:08:04.9   2180 1926   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_000028_TTUQ2b1x1_3150094_2sp3errB/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 60090_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080
The candidate 60090_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 07.20747    2461167.70747    14.24    10:03:21.04 +11:19:45.6   2293 4842   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_000028_TTUQ2b1x1_3150094_2sp3errB/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 60094_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080
The candidate 60094_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 07.20747    2461167.70747    14.74    09:57:03.51 +17:01:28.8   3208 1386   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_000028_TTUQ2b1x1_3150094_2sp3errB/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.7") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 60110_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080
The candidate 60110_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 07.20747    2461167.70747    14.67    10:00:43.51 +14:40:53.5   2680 2808   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_000028_TTUQ2b1x1_3150094_2sp3errB/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 60138_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080
The candidate 60138_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 07.20747    2461167.70747    15.01    09:58:12.08 +17:04:58.7   3042 1351   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_000028_TTUQ2b1x1_3150094_2sp3errB/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 60140_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080
The candidate 60140_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 07.20747    2461167.70747    14.66    10:00:47.43 +13:43:19.7   2672 3389   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_000028_TTUQ2b1x1_3150094_2sp3errB/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 60168_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080
The candidate 60168_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 07.20747    2461167.70747    14.96    09:59:15.17 +13:24:24.4   2899 3579   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_000028_TTUQ2b1x1_3150094_2sp3errB/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.7") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 60208_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080
The candidate 60208_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 07.20747    2461167.70747    15.07    09:59:53.42 +14:29:29.6   2803 2923   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_000028_TTUQ2b1x1_3150094_2sp3errB/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 60231_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080
The candidate 60231_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 07.20747    2461167.70747    15.09    09:52:23.96 +18:02:47.4   3876 0760   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_000028_TTUQ2b1x1_3150094_2sp3errB/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 60250_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080
The candidate 60250_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 07.20747    2461167.70747    14.80    09:58:29.11 +12:35:34.9   3015 4071   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_000028_TTUQ2b1x1_3150094_2sp3errB/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 60251_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080
The candidate 60251_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 07.20747    2461167.70747    14.97    10:00:31.37 +15:03:41.4   2709 2578   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_000028_TTUQ2b1x1_3150094_2sp3errB/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.7") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 60258_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080
Preparing report for the candidate 60258_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 60276_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080
The candidate 60276_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 07.20747    2461167.70747    15.03    09:52:25.41 +17:24:29.1   3877 1149   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_000028_TTUQ2b1x1_3150094_2sp3errB/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 60303_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080
The candidate 60303_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 07.20747    2461167.70747    14.67    09:59:44.86 +10:22:54.3   2832 5415   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_000028_TTUQ2b1x1_3150094_2sp3errB/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.7") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 60339_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080
The candidate 60339_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 07.20747    2461167.70747    15.02    09:36:09.94 +12:49:28.9   6304 3874   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_000028_TTUQ2b1x1_3150094_2sp3errB/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (8.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56750_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080
The candidate 56750_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 05 07.20747    2461167.70747    13.39    10:08:22.80 +13:14:56.0   1547 3676   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_000028_TTUQ2b1x1_3150094_2sp3errB/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 24147_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080
The candidate 24147_fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 05 07.20747    2461167.70747    12.59    09:57:46.70 +14:30:06.8   3113 2915   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-07_CI_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_000028_TTUQ2b1x1_3150094_2sp3errB/fd_Leo-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_23-58-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.6") between the two second-epoch detections
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 19s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Leo-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
09:55:40.38 +15:51:30.4
09:42:46.86 +15:52:47.5
09:33:22.75 +11:40:55.2
########### Completed Leo-04-Q2b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
09:55:40.38 +15:51:30.4
09:42:46.86 +15:52:47.5
09:33:22.75 +11:40:55.2
###################################################################################
09:55:40.38 +15:51:30.4  -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list)
09:42:46.86 +15:52:47.5  -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list)
09:33:22.75 +11:40:55.2  -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
09:33:22.75 +11:40:55.2  -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
09:33:22.75 +11:40:55.2  -- not a known variable star
Found 1 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
1 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN= NO   ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Adding the following to the exclusion list ####
09:33:22.75 +11:40:55.2
####################################################
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461167.70507193 -observatory V36
02:22:58.29 +13:02:50.8 Mercury (-1.4mag)
04:56:06.64 +23:47:31.9 Venus (-3.9mag)
01:17:55.71 +07:19:02.9 Mars (1.2mag)
07:24:26.08 +22:24:59.8 Jupiter (-2.0mag)
00:38:13.14 +01:44:18.6 Saturn (0.9mag)
03:52:28.88 +20:02:29.2 Uranus (5.8mag)
00:13:24.33 +00:00:35.2 Neptune (7.8mag)
20:34:14.47 -22:55:11.6 Pluto (14.5mag)
19:16:28.27 -26:38:10.8 Moon (-11.1mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 363 May  7 00:03 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461167.70507193:
07:24:23.78 +22:25:07.4 Io (5.9mag)
07:24:26.64 +22:25:01.1 Europa (6.0mag)
07:24:45.04 +22:24:13.4 Ganymede (5.5mag)
07:24:26.45 +22:24:50.5 Callisto (6.7mag)
07:26:39.93 +22:04:41.9 Himalia (15.4mag)
07:24:23.50 +22:25:07.6 Thebe (16.4mag)
07:27:08.02 +22:32:47.3 Elara (17.4mag)
07:24:43.83 +22:53:52.5 Pasiphae (17.5mag)
07:32:12.31 +22:24:40.1 Carme (18.7mag)
00:38:04.62 +01:44:22.7 Titan (8.7mag)
00:38:12.40 +01:44:34.4 Rhea (10.0mag)
00:37:52.85 +01:42:13.1 Iapetus (11.4mag)
00:38:22.28 +01:44:38.6 Hyperion (14.7mag)
00:39:31.05 +01:50:36.9 Phoebe (16.8mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 569 May  7 00:03 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461167.70507193:
16:49:09.19 -27:40:50.5 JWST
11:08:02.03 +51:43:05.4 Chandra
18:11:18.08 -34:17:55.8 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 May  7 00:03 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461167.70507193 -observatory V36
-> Warning: Longitude 255.61742 is outside valid range [-180, 180]
07:11:22.12 +27:50:44.2 17.7mag P/2009 WX51 (Catalina)
18:55:52.68 -30:11:21.3 13.8mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
05:23:37.51 -68:47:31.3 17.4mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
05:38:03.55 +31:36:34.3 17.3mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
17:26:16.54 +12:53:26.9 17.7mag C/2021 G2 (ATLAS)
23:14:13.15 +30:09:47.3 17.1mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS)
04:54:38.28 +26:32:50.7 16.2mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
09:10:38.25 +31:54:27.2 16.4mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS)
08:36:21.40 +01:50:53.0 17.5mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS)
18:46:21.66 +20:09:28.3 17.6mag C/2023 A3 (Tsuchinshan-ATLAS)
15:32:33.01 -11:13:12.8 17.5mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS)
09:01:00.96 -08:49:06.8 17.8mag C/2023 F3 (ATLAS)
22:10:34.18 +64:17:59.5 17.6mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon)
18:53:23.84 -04:21:48.0 13.9mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS)
17:48:17.88 +88:18:56.4 17.9mag C/2023 X2 (Lemmon)
06:32:58.34 +63:35:05.4 17.4mag C/2024 A1 (ATLAS)
05:54:36.55 +23:37:28.8 12.3mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
16:03:39.73 +09:42:58.3 17.3mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS)
20:23:35.57 +21:21:50.4 14.3mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
03:46:15.00 -19:24:49.9 16.2mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
05:35:45.54 +40:30:14.0 17.8mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov)
12:22:40.99 +52:44:56.1 16.2mag C/2025 L1 (ATLAS)
04:02:00.38 -29:57:52.7 18.0mag C/2025 Q3 (ATLAS)
05:06:57.97 -05:45:01.9 9.5mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS)
12:45:47.08 +04:05:41.5 17.3mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
05:13:45.92 +01:30:43.2 17.3mag C/2026 A1 (MAPS)
00:54:46.19 +40:24:26.2 15.2mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao)
19:23:50.97 -08:36:13.2 10.6mag 10P/Tempel
14:33:15.42 +00:26:22.1 15.9mag 24P/Schaumasse
10:59:14.28 -01:00:18.4 15.8mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
10:41:19.81 -02:52:28.7 17.4mag 43P/Wolf-Harrington
02:21:43.69 +20:58:10.6 17.4mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson
07:52:27.41 +32:11:28.8 16.9mag 63P/Wild
23:54:40.06 -09:04:51.7 15.7mag 65P/Gunn
05:03:12.38 +27:38:49.0 16.1mag 76P/West-Kohoutek-Ikemura
01:53:29.10 +12:13:52.6 14.1mag 78P/Gehrels
00:03:18.05 -03:13:00.4 14.9mag 88P/Howell
03:13:05.55 +25:42:02.2 15.1mag 93P/Lovas
05:37:40.67 +33:08:46.4 16.0mag 123P/West-Hartley
08:57:30.09 +28:41:10.7 16.3mag 124P/Mrkos
03:06:43.14 +16:35:38.1 16.4mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt
03:29:34.28 +16:48:10.9 17.6mag 131P/Mueller
03:20:39.56 +18:35:38.9 11.1mag 141P/Machholz
03:25:41.69 +12:09:50.9 11.0mag 141P-A/Machholz
02:05:39.99 +08:08:19.7 10.8mag 141P-D/Machholz
02:33:48.08 -30:01:31.1 17.9mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS
02:02:43.31 +09:09:27.4 14.9mag 162P/SidingSpring
17:14:17.35 -11:20:23.7 16.1mag 235P/LINEAR
06:21:40.32 +35:46:09.2 17.1mag 240P/NEAT
07:51:21.39 -03:12:45.2 17.9mag 242P/Spahr
23:10:10.67 -14:37:38.5 17.3mag 260P/McNaught
02:44:05.93 +25:39:29.8 17.8mag 295P/LINEAR
15:32:20.79 +08:04:52.2 17.4mag 391P/Kowalski
07:44:39.88 +21:18:10.4 17.8mag 450P/LONEOS
06:08:15.52 +43:46:58.3 17.6mag 493P/LONEOS
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.8K May  7 00:03 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
21:00:10.71 -32:17:03.90  AT2026kis  2026-04-27.36 16.15
14:32:57.37 -58:13:26.40  ASASSN-26dc  2026-04-27.27 13.42
15:32:05.35 -43:54:34.60  ASASSN-26db  2026-04-27.37 16.06
16:34:34.94 -54:34:58.20  ASASSN-26da  2026-04-25.14 15.99
10:06:55.04 -01:13:49.70  SN2026jsg  2026-04-24.99 16.28
15:15:57.17 +56:18:32.80  SN2026kid  2026-04-24.52 -3.65
07:58:28.45 +57:03:42.40  AT2026kcf  2026-04-24.2 16.89
11:38:21.80 -50:43:06.50  SN2026jkb  2026-04-24.24 15.38
10:06:11.41 -39:41:04.20  AT2026dil  2026-04-24.2 16.85
14:21:40.08 +13:13:46.30  SN2026jlm  2026-04-22.16 15.12
10:53:55.47 -16:06:07.00  ASASSN-26cz  2026-04-22.24 16.32
21:00:10.71 -32:17:03.90    2026-04-27.36 16.15
13:45:02.03 +15:17:14.50  ASASSN-26cy  2026-04-21.27 15.78
13:20:52.22 -35:57:03.60  AT2026jcm  2026-04-19.01 16.65
13:36:15.66 -36:53:48.40  SN 2026iqy  2026-04-18.92 17.31
06:34:01.33 -40:07:34.00  ASASSN-26cx  2026-04-19.07 16.16
23:33:57.97 -45:12:11.90  SN 2026idu  2026-04-19.41 15.9
12:10:50.92 +66:55:31.20  SN 2026icv  2026-04-17.14 16.03
21:36:59.06 -60:43:35.90  ASASSN-26cv  2026-04-17.35 -1.18
08:13:26.26 -27:07:30.50  ASASSN-26cw  2026-04-17.07 -1.01
14:49:14.13 -27:29:20.60  ASASSN-26cu  2026-04-16.06 14.03
17:21:59.44 -38:54:04.60  ASASSN-26ct  2026-04-14.4 15.15
15:25:54.99 +07:49:24.50  SN2026huo  2026-04-12.14 16.96
21:00:10.71 -32:17:03.90    2026-04-27.36 16.15
12:23:20.40 +04:53:39.10  AT2026ixd  2026-04-12.14 17.65
17:46:09.76 -61:19:50.40  SN2026icy  2026-04-12.2 17.03
09:25:46.42 +02:13:46.30  SN2026gud  2026-04-11.98 16.49
16:52:15.46 -60:27:45.90  ASASSN-26cs  2026-04-12.4 15.5
04:20:55.37 -51:15:31.10  ASASSN-26cr  2026-04-12.01 15.37
22:25:39.35 +36:45:06.90  AT2026ihl  2026-04-10.48 14.21
19:40:44.94 +00:41:03.80  AT2026imw  2026-04-10.32 16.06
19:52:04.70 +05:53:33.50  ASASSN-26cq  2026-04-9.31 14.98
16:08:18.39 -64:11:08.80  ASASSN-26cp  2026-04-9.14 13.64
09:22:22.90 -61:02:43.70  SN2026idh  2026-04-7.97 16.34
05:06:54.12 -19:42:26.40  AT2026imr  2026-04-8 17.49
07:14:55.34 -36:03:21.40  AT2026hei  2026-04-8.12 16.7
21:35:33.14 -19:01:34.80  AT2026ihm  2026-04-8.36 16.7
04:28:24.08 -32:25:35.30  AT2026imo  2026-04-8.02 16.81
05:10:35.79 -39:38:40.80  SN 2026hnn  2026-04-7.04 17.07
09:54:32.04 -01:17:25.80  ASASSN-26cn  2026-04-7.01 15.58
07:46:24.43 -77:29:35.90  ASASSN-26co  2026-04-7.15 14.93
05:00:45.52 -29:51:06.20  AT2026hvw  2026-04-6.03 16.51
19:49:33.10 -23:37:11.00  ASASSN-26cl  2026-04-5.29 14.98
19:32:43.55 -22:39:33.40  ASASSN-26cm  2026-04-4.3 13.88
18:08:57.38 +76:48:23.60  ASASSN-26ck  2026-04-2.37 15.38
16:16:36.10 +44:52:30.20  AT2026hyy  2026-04-2.58 13.81
21:55:23.31 -34:48:53.90  ASASSN-26cj  2026-03-30.4 -1.47
11:19:50.81 -27:51:50.40  SN2026gvk  2026-03-30 15.28
11:53:57.02 -23:09:46.20  SN2026gzx  2026-03-28.75 15.27
07:13:46.14 -33:10:15.70  ASASSN-26ci  2026-03-28.15 15.14
09:03:36.09 -67:58:13.00  SN2026hkg  2026-03-28.19 15.82
07:03:00.72 +39:14:43.00  SN2026fin  2026-03-28.27 15.82
05:35:42.80 -63:44:05.50  ASASSN-26ch  2026-03-27.86 13.02
11:23:19.04 +34:22:38.00  SN2026fwt  2026-03-27.3 16.56
19:03:49.79 +37:04:05.20  ASASSN-26ce  2026-03-26.56 16.3
20:26:56.07 -52:54:06.50  AT2026hiy  2026-03-26.35 16.95
05:25:54.76 -30:15:35.80  ASASSN-26cg  2026-03-25.07 16.88
06:57:16.49 -26:54:37.20  SN2026fzb  2026-03-25.14 15.8
14:37:38.23 -43:00:52.30  ASASSN-26cd  2026-03-24.24 12.52
17:34:53.03 +06:04:29.70  AT2026gzl  2026-03-23.27 15.82
08:30:02.60 -35:12:47.50  ASASSN-26cf  2026-03-23.2 14.82
16:54:25.33 +37:49:56.60  SN 2026evz  2026-03-21.32 17.54
17:06:19.20 -18:54:19.50  ASASSN-26bx  2026-03-21.25 16.39
19:01:16.28 -29:29:23.10  ASASSN-26bw  2026-03-21.33 15.81
08:46:05.75 +10:47:39.80  ASASSN-26ca  2026-03-21.13 14.27
12:14:58.16 +63:47:16.20  SN 2026fvx  2026-03-21.12 15.6
18:02:55.90 -75:23:02.60  ASASSN-26bz  2026-03-21.32 16.16
12:16:02.87 -53:16:33.70  ASASSN-26cc  2026-03-20.08 3.93
13:08:21.85 +29:13:44.20  SN 2026fmh  2026-03-20.16 -0.33
19:56:38.48 -34:45:21.50  ASASSN-26cb  2026-03-20.35 -3.26
14:32:41.15 -41:38:48.50  ASASSN-26by  2026-03-20.15 -1.31
13:00:42.99 +37:18:34.60  SN2026fjc  2026-03-19.5 15.97
06:02:44.21 -04:11:06.20  ASASSN-26bv  2026-03-19.19 15.67
12:20:27.96 -45:55:38.40  ASASSN-26bt  2026-03-18.8 16.32
07:49:57.30 -56:14:35.10  ASASSN-26bu  2026-03-19.19 15.74
06:04:29.75 +53:23:34.00  SN 2026eza  2026-03-18.2 17.48
11:54:57.87 +69:19:28.90  AT2026fsf  2026-03-18.14 16.95
10:44:46.95 +58:27:29.30  SN 2026enn  2026-03-18.13 17.53
20:45:54.04 -73:26:43.00  AT 2026ezy  2026-03-18.13 16.83
06:53:18.10 -59:10:49.30  ASASSN-26bs  2026-03-18.02 16.93
07:45:09.29 -62:14:36.20  ASASSN-26br  2026-03-16.16 16.78
19:24:27.93 -52:04:36.40  AT 2023uk  2026-03-16.35 14.2
04:52:54.50 -15:20:57.10  AT2026fhw  2026-03-14.06 SDSS
11:10:34.24 +02:58:48.10  SN2026drr  2026-03-14.08 0.2
07:26:45.73 -27:45:13.90  ASASSN-26bo  2026-03-14.17 13.8
16:35:46.94 +58:12:28.40  SN2026ebt  2026-03-12.41 17.12
13:01:19.45 +15:42:15.00  SN2026ehe  2026-03-12.11 -0.29
09:15:55.41 +10:08:09.70  SN2026efq  2026-03-12.16 0.06
03:31:20.92 -35:29:29.00  SN2026evh  2026-03-12.05 17.29
06:26:19.15 -85:18:28.10  AT2026ffp  2026-03-12.16 0.37
14:16:42.30 -41:18:36.50  AT2026fij  2026-03-12.05 15.97
10:45:04.71 +00:06:13.10  SN 2026exe  2026-03-11.78 16.48
18:07:45.58 +69:43:01.00  SN2026ess  2026-03-12.37 17.37
13:11:03.58 +49:06:31.80  AT2026ewa  2026-03-12.42 16.77
15:03:25.23 -63:11:22.20  ASASSN-26bp  2026-03-11.92 13.33
13:09:37.25 -35:50:25.20  AT2024cmo  2026-03-11.12 16.29
13:06:01.97 -15:50:14.40  AT2026fdy  2026-03-10.33 16.68
11:30:09.70 -47:26:45.00  ASASSN-26bn  2026-03-10.3 15.14
05:03:25.25 -24:16:50.40  (= Gaia  2026-03-9.09 14.32
03:42:32.53 -04:17:53.70  ASASSN-26bm  2026-03-8.04 15.22
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.8K May  7 00:03 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
05:19:15.40 -02:04:51.5  TCP J05191540-0204515  2026-02-13.4306  14.5mag
10:52:41.26 +36:40:08.9  TCP J10524126+3640089  2026-02-17.6065  17.4mag
05:50:50.81 +36:22:45.1  TCP J05505081+3622451  2026-02-17.5511  15.7mag
00:42:51.33 +41:13:49.1  PNV J00425133+4113491  2026-02-20.738  18.3mag
00:43:04.88 +41:29:41.4  PNV J00430488+4129414  2026-02-20.5923  18.84Cmag
17:43:29.74 +11:24:00.3  TCP J17432974+1124003  2026-02-22.3773  13.6mag
09:55:01.59 +69:08:42.7  PNV J09550159+6908427  2026-02-20.893  19.0mag
07:03:25.76 -12:41:40.1  TCP J07032576-1241401  2026-03-10.4268  15.4mag
00:42:36.82 +41:16:05.8  PNV J00423682+4116058  2026-03-12.5744  17.24Cmag
07:26:45.79 -27:45:14.1  TCP J07264579-2745141  2026-03-17.4417  14.8mag
17:57:19.56 -28:08:14.7  TCP J17571956-2808147  2026-03-19.7972  14.5mag
08:46:05.73 +10:47:39.7  TCP J08460573+1047397  2026-03-21.1936  14.5mag
09:55:38.83 +69:05:21.7  PNV J09553883+6905217  2026-04-01.893  19.4mag
19:32:43.67 -22:39:30.7  TCP J19324367-2239307  2026-04-05.4395  13.6mag
16:16:36.03 +44:52:28.9  TCP J16163603+4452289  2026-04-05.6655  14.2mag
00:43:38.36 +41:15:32.4  PNV J00433836+4115324  2026-04-08.079  17.2mag
15:41:11.68 +59:18:26.8  TCP J15411168+5918268  2026-04-12.9625  19.2mag
00:43:35.02 +41:46:28.0  PNV J00433502+4146280  2026-04-23.056  15.9mag
00:42:55.64 +41:14:12.2  PNV J00425564+4114122  2026-04-24.042  16.2mag
21:14:03.38 +56:46:44.1  TCP J21140338+5646441  2026-05-05.3534  16.7mag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 188K May  7 00:03 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
08:55:17.289 -14:31:27.39  SN 2026kuh  2026-04-26.37 19.49
09:49:48.625 -39:29:18.93  AT 2026kug  2026-04-25.39 19.81
10:32:10.204 -38:40:39.83  AT 2026kuf  2026-04-25.39 19.55
04:28:43.689 -54:38:28.82  AT 2026kue  2026-04-25.00 18.429
15:17:49.890 +51:45:03.75  AT 2026kud  2026-04-24.46 20.78
17:10:13.892 +34:25:01.96  AT 2026kuc  2026-04-23.54 19.71
14:39:14.376 +13:33:42.83  AT 2026kub  2026-04-19.43 21.39
14:42:19.868 +50:16:48.55  AT 2026kua  2026-04-24.46 20.25
20:32:14.947 -09:12:11.58  AT 2026ktz  2026-04-16.78 19.7
22:41:48.266 -19:10:12.74  AT 2026kty  2026-04-25.80 19.14
20:17:46.546 -42:47:22.73  AT 2026ktx  2026-04-25.79 19.98
11:32:18.410 -39:27:47.00  AT 2026ktw  2026-04-23.15 20.3
12:50:40.240 +33:39:42.77  AT 2026ktv  2026-04-25.02 19.445
11:42:18.333 +54:08:04.40  AT 2026ktu  2026-04-22.94 19.71
16:17:17.316 +23:37:30.49  AT 2026ktt  2026-04-25.04 19.5
12:40:35.980 -44:44:46.56  AT 2026kts  2026-04-25.46 19.25
15:36:10.361 +06:30:11.65  AT 2026ktr  2026-04-22.08 20.34
14:50:38.196 -37:53:19.68  AT 2026ktq  2026-04-25.52 18.94
20:45:21.368 -15:29:46.68  AT 2026ktp  2026-04-07.79 19.07
18:54:18.071 -33:51:08.31  AT 2026kto  2026-04-15.74 19.74
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 30K May  7 00:03 tns_transients_list.txt

=== Transient Factory Profiling ===
Started: Thu May  7 00:03:15 CDT 2026
=======================================
TIMING SExtractor: 1 seconds
TIMING matching_and_photometry: 0 seconds
TIMING lightcurve_write: 0 seconds
TIMING select_aperture: 0 seconds
    VAST_RUN_default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1: 3s (0.05 min)
    WCS_CACHE_SETUP: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_CALIBRATION_AND_EPHEMERIS: 21s (0.35 min)
    PLATE_VERIFY_AND_POINTING: 0s (0.00 min)
    UCAC5_PLATE_SOLVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    MAGNITUDE_CALIBRATION: 35s (0.58 min)
    MAGCAL_SANITY_CHECK: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_MAGNITUDE_CONSOLIDATED: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_FRAME_EDGE: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_SECOND_EPOCH_VERIFY: 0s (0.00 min)
    CANDIDATE_FILTERING_TOTAL: 0s (0.00 min)
    EXCLUSION_LIST_PREPARATION: 0s (0.00 min)
    SEEING_AND_LIMITING_MAG: 0s (0.00 min)
    WAIT_FOR_UCAC5: 1s (0.02 min)
    WCS_IMAGE_ARCHIVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    HTML_REPORT: 0s (0.00 min)
  SE_CONFIG_default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1: 60s (1.00 min)
TIMING SExtractor: 7 seconds
TIMING matching_and_photometry: 1 seconds
TIMING lightcurve_write: 1 seconds
TIMING select_aperture: 1 seconds
    VAST_RUN_default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL: 12s (0.20 min)
    WCS_CACHE_SETUP: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_CALIBRATION_AND_EPHEMERIS: 1s (0.02 min)
    PLATE_VERIFY_AND_POINTING: 0s (0.00 min)
    UCAC5_PLATE_SOLVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    MAGNITUDE_CALIBRATION: 49s (0.82 min)
    MAGCAL_SANITY_CHECK: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_MAGNITUDE_CONSOLIDATED: 2s (0.03 min)
      FILTER_FRAME_EDGE: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_SECOND_EPOCH_VERIFY: 0s (0.00 min)
    CANDIDATE_FILTERING_TOTAL: 2s (0.03 min)
    EXCLUSION_LIST_PREPARATION: 0s (0.00 min)
    SEEING_AND_LIMITING_MAG: 1s (0.02 min)
    WAIT_FOR_UCAC5: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_IMAGE_ARCHIVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    HTML_REPORT: 19s (0.32 min)
  SE_CONFIG_default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL: 84s (1.40 min)
FIELD_Leo-04-Q2b1x1: 156s (2.60 min)
=======================================
TOTAL_RUNTIME: 159s (2.65 min)
Finished: Thu May  7 00:05:54 CDT 2026