This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-06_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_230222_TTUQ2b1x1_745491_tXrbHUsn
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461167.6656,7.12,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260507.1656 7.12CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461167.6656,7.19,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260507.1656 7.19CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 07.1656 2461167.6656 12.12 07:41:24.32 +24:04:04.3
195.91103 21.20635 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 7.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.40 Harmonia -1 0 1 11.5 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:41:24.32 +24:04:04.3: 15.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:41:24.32 +24:04:04.3: 15.94 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461167.6656,12.12,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260507.1656 12.12CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461167.6656,7.68,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260507.1656 7.68CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461167.6656,7.74,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260507.1656 7.74CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 07.1656 2461167.6656 13.59 07:29:55.93 +23:17:51.8
195.63528 18.48143 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 7.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.200 Dynamene 1 0 1 13.9 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:29:55.93 +23:17:51.8: 16.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:29:55.93 +23:17:51.8: 16.29 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461167.6656,13.59,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260507.1656 13.59CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 07.1656 2461167.6656 13.51 07:24:48.88 +18:03:36.1
200.17353 15.31659 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.6" and 7.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.34 Circe 1 2 2 13.9 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:24:48.88 +18:03:36.1: 15.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:24:48.88 +18:03:36.1: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461167.6656,13.51,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260507.1656 13.51CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 07.1656 2461167.6656 14.12 07:33:00.18 +20:55:15.4
198.23528 18.22601 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.6" and 7.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.206 Hersilia 2 -2 2 14.4 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:33:00.18 +20:55:15.4: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:33:00.18 +20:55:15.4: 16.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461167.6656,14.12,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260507.1656 14.12CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 07.1656 2461167.6656 14.30 07:30:10.62 +23:11:33.0
195.76043 18.49351 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 7.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.133 Cyrene 0 0 0 14.2 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:30:10.62 +23:11:33.0: 16.17 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:30:10.62 +23:11:33.0: 16.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461167.6656,14.30,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260507.1656 14.30CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 07.1656 2461167.6656 14.54 07:35:13.18 +21:20:19.2
198.03925 18.86409 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.7" and 7.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.334 Chicago -1 -1 1 14.6 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:35:13.18 +21:20:19.2: 16.16 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:35:13.18 +21:20:19.2: 16.20 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461167.6656,14.54,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260507.1656 14.54CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 07.1656 2461167.6656 13.14 07:10:39.32 +22:25:37.8
194.65401 14.05562 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 7.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.17 Thetis 1 1 2 13.4 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:10:39.32 +22:25:37.8: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:10:39.32 +22:25:37.8: 16.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461167.6656,13.14,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260507.1656 13.14CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.73760365 18.01.2026 05:41:58.955 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
First image: 2461058.73760365 18.01.2026 05:41:58.955 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Last image: 2461167.66592189 07.05.2026 03:58:45.651 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-06_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_230222_TTUQ2b1x1_745491_tXrbHUsn/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 6
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.60
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 13776
Objects passed selection criteria: 13755
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 13727
Average stars matched: 12561 (91.5058 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 122668 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed May 6 12:14:36 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-43-g0c21e0c3
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed May 6 23:06:11 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.73760365 18.01.2026 05:41:58.955 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
First image: 2461058.73760365 18.01.2026 05:41:58.955 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Last image: 2461167.66592189 07.05.2026 03:58:45.651 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-06_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_230222_TTUQ2b1x1_745491_tXrbHUsn/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 116
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.28
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 56 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 95826
Objects passed selection criteria: 95636
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 96788.2
Average stars matched: 88473.8 (91.4096 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 2172356 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed May 6 12:14:36 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-43-g0c21e0c3
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed May 6 23:09:09 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-06_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_230222_TTUQ2b1x1_745491_tXrbHUsn/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-57-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-06_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_230222_TTUQ2b1x1_745491_tXrbHUsn/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-06_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_230222_TTUQ2b1x1_745491_tXrbHUsn/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-57-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-06_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_230222_TTUQ2b1x1_745491_tXrbHUsn/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461167.66525465
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits'
wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits'
wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-57-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-57-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-57-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-57-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits'
wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:22:55.118 +21:59:39.20 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-57-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-57-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits
Image size: 937.7'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:10.522 +22:00:47.54 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:22:55.118 +21:59:39.20
Second-epoch image center 07:23:10.522 +22:00:47.54
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0625 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
Image size: 937.7'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:12.201 +22:00:07.12 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:22:55.118 +21:59:39.20
Second-epoch image center 07:23:12.201 +22:00:07.12
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0665 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:23:10.522 +22:00:47.54
Second-epoch second image center 07:23:12.201 +22:00:07.12
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01297 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits &> /tmp/tmp.fQxVcwmDmF
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits &> /tmp/tmp.kUAvmMqz4r
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-06_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_230222_TTUQ2b1x1_745491_tXrbHUsn/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-57-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Zl1oIYXXQ3
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-06_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_230222_TTUQ2b1x1_745491_tXrbHUsn/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-57-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-06_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_230222_TTUQ2b1x1_745491_tXrbHUsn/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits &> /tmp/tmp.XyWM4Yt9hB
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-06_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_230222_TTUQ2b1x1_745491_tXrbHUsn/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 22550 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 101.7556 to 119.3352 deg, Dec +16.3006 to +27.3458 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 101.7556 to 119.3352 deg, Dec 16.3006 to 27.3458 deg
Loaded 14532 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10648 out of 11733 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11733 out of 22550 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.897900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.897900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.60
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.30
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.30
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 22550 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 101.7556 to 119.3352 deg, Dec +16.3006 to +27.3458 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 101.7556 to 119.3352 deg, Dec 16.3006 to 27.3458 deg
Loaded 14532 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10648 out of 11733 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11733 out of 22550 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits (aperture=6.1)
Read 23656 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 102.0351 to 119.5904 deg, Dec +16.4807 to +27.2946 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 102.0351 to 119.5904 deg, Dec 16.4807 to 27.2946 deg
Loaded 13969 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10670 out of 11761 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11761 out of 23656 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 5 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
2.3 pix Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
2.5 pix fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-57-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits
2.5 pix fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
15.3 mag. Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-57-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.7 (SNR ) 11.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.fQxVcwmDmF (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-06_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_230222_TTUQ2b1x1_745491_tXrbHUsn/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2218, passed=22550
Got 22550 stars (including 20300 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 22550 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 954 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 941 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22225 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 954 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22223 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22223 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 953 stars left (next iteration limit 1048)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits -region wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.kUAvmMqz4r (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-06_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_230222_TTUQ2b1x1_745491_tXrbHUsn/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2265, passed=23656
Got 23656 stars (including 21362 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 23656 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 951 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 930 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22858 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 952 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22858 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22858 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 949 stars left (next iteration limit 1045)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits -region wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Zl1oIYXXQ3 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-06_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_230222_TTUQ2b1x1_745491_tXrbHUsn/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-06_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_230222_TTUQ2b1x1_745491_tXrbHUsn/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-57-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-06_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_230222_TTUQ2b1x1_745491_tXrbHUsn/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-57-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-06_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_230222_TTUQ2b1x1_745491_tXrbHUsn/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-57-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-06_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_230222_TTUQ2b1x1_745491_tXrbHUsn/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-57-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-06_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_230222_TTUQ2b1x1_745491_tXrbHUsn/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-57-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-06_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_230222_TTUQ2b1x1_745491_tXrbHUsn/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-57-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-57-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-57-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-57-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-57-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-57-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-57-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-57-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-06_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_230222_TTUQ2b1x1_745491_tXrbHUsn/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-57-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-57-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=932, passed=14371
Got 14371 stars (including 13433 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-57-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14371 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013024 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010419 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 929 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14183 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14179 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14179 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.65"
Excluding outliers - 939 stars left (next iteration limit 1034)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-57-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-57-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-06_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_230222_TTUQ2b1x1_745491_tXrbHUsn/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-57-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-57-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-57-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.XyWM4Yt9hB (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-06_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_230222_TTUQ2b1x1_745491_tXrbHUsn/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-06_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_230222_TTUQ2b1x1_745491_tXrbHUsn/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-06_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_230222_TTUQ2b1x1_745491_tXrbHUsn/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-06_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_230222_TTUQ2b1x1_745491_tXrbHUsn/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-06_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_230222_TTUQ2b1x1_745491_tXrbHUsn/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-06_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_230222_TTUQ2b1x1_745491_tXrbHUsn/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-06_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_230222_TTUQ2b1x1_745491_tXrbHUsn/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-06_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_230222_TTUQ2b1x1_745491_tXrbHUsn/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=966, passed=14435
Got 14435 stars (including 13454 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14435 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013024 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010419 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 926 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14235 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14235 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14235 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.68"
Excluding outliers - 940 stars left (next iteration limit 1034)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-06_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_230222_TTUQ2b1x1_745491_tXrbHUsn/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-57-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-57-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-06_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_230222_TTUQ2b1x1_745491_tXrbHUsn/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-57-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-06_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_230222_TTUQ2b1x1_745491_tXrbHUsn/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:40:57.70 +21:48:03.1: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:41:24.32 +24:04:04.3: 15.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:41:24.32 +24:04:04.3: 15.94 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:40:57.70 +21:48:03.1: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out34569.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out34634.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 11s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34569_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 34569_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:40:57.70 +21:48:03.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN= 9.19, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=10.17)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.464 673283784901552256 115.24010884522 +21.80115033088 9.2919 9.1725 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.464#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34570_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023
Preparing report for the candidate 34570_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34571_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023
Preparing report for the candidate 34571_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34634_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023
Preparing report for the candidate 34634_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30957_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 30957_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:43:02.38 +23:26:57.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 14s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Gem-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
07:41:24.32 +24:04:04.3
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-06_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_230222_TTUQ2b1x1_745491_tXrbHUsn/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-57-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-06_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_230222_TTUQ2b1x1_745491_tXrbHUsn/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-06_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_230222_TTUQ2b1x1_745491_tXrbHUsn/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-57-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-06_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_230222_TTUQ2b1x1_745491_tXrbHUsn/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-57-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-57-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:22:55.118 +21:59:39.20 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-57-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-57-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits
Image size: 937.7'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:10.522 +22:00:47.54 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:22:55.118 +21:59:39.20
Second-epoch image center 07:23:10.522 +22:00:47.54
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0625 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Image size: 937.7'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:12.201 +22:00:07.12 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:22:55.118 +21:59:39.20
Second-epoch image center 07:23:12.201 +22:00:07.12
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0665 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:23:10.522 +22:00:47.54
Second-epoch second image center 07:23:12.201 +22:00:07.12
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01297 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits &> /tmp/tmp.q6NFz7ofb2
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits &> /tmp/tmp.iX2KC4JJyH
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-06_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_230222_TTUQ2b1x1_745491_tXrbHUsn/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-57-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits &> /tmp/tmp.KzZASapvOc
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-06_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_230222_TTUQ2b1x1_745491_tXrbHUsn/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-57-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-06_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_230222_TTUQ2b1x1_745491_tXrbHUsn/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits &> /tmp/tmp.tKLX08e1dZ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-06_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_230222_TTUQ2b1x1_745491_tXrbHUsn/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 153680 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 101.7461 to 119.3352 deg, Dec +16.3007 to +27.3487 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 101.7461 to 119.3352 deg, Dec 16.3007 to 27.3487 deg
Loaded 14554 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8811 out of 12036 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12036 out of 153680 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.757100
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.757100
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.28
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.48
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.48
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 153680 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 101.7461 to 119.3352 deg, Dec +16.3007 to +27.3487 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 101.7461 to 119.3352 deg, Dec 16.3007 to 27.3487 deg
Loaded 14554 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8811 out of 12036 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12036 out of 153680 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits (aperture=4.6)
Read 151496 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 102.0337 to 119.6237 deg, Dec +16.4751 to +27.2973 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 102.0337 to 119.6237 deg, Dec 16.4751 to 27.2973 deg
Loaded 14001 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8799 out of 12010 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12010 out of 151496 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits (aperture=4.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 98 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
2.1 pix Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
2.3 pix fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-57-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits
2.3 pix fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
1.9 pix wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
15.5 mag. Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-57-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits
14.9 mag. fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.8 (SNR ) 14.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.q6NFz7ofb2 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-06_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_230222_TTUQ2b1x1_745491_tXrbHUsn/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=36, blended=17863, passed=153644
Got 153644 stars (including 135507 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 153644 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 941 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 151041 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 151042 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 151042 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 953 stars left (next iteration limit 1048)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits -region wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.iX2KC4JJyH (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-06_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_230222_TTUQ2b1x1_745491_tXrbHUsn/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=23, blended=17705, passed=151473
Got 151473 stars (including 133510 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 151473 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 954 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 937 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 148383 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 954 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 148381 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 148382 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 953 stars left (next iteration limit 1049)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits -region wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.KzZASapvOc (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-06_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_230222_TTUQ2b1x1_745491_tXrbHUsn/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-06_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_230222_TTUQ2b1x1_745491_tXrbHUsn/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-57-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-06_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_230222_TTUQ2b1x1_745491_tXrbHUsn/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-57-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-06_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_230222_TTUQ2b1x1_745491_tXrbHUsn/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-57-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-06_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_230222_TTUQ2b1x1_745491_tXrbHUsn/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-57-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-06_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_230222_TTUQ2b1x1_745491_tXrbHUsn/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-57-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-06_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_230222_TTUQ2b1x1_745491_tXrbHUsn/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-57-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-57-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-57-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-57-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-57-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-57-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-57-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-57-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-06_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_230222_TTUQ2b1x1_745491_tXrbHUsn/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-57-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-57-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=22, blended=7126, passed=90013
Got 90013 stars (including 82793 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-57-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 90013 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013024 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010419 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 949 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 925 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 87944 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 949 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 87943 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 87940 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Excluding outliers - 947 stars left (next iteration limit 1042)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-57-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-57-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-06_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_230222_TTUQ2b1x1_745491_tXrbHUsn/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-57-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-57-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-57-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.tKLX08e1dZ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-06_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_230222_TTUQ2b1x1_745491_tXrbHUsn/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-06_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_230222_TTUQ2b1x1_745491_tXrbHUsn/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-06_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_230222_TTUQ2b1x1_745491_tXrbHUsn/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-06_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_230222_TTUQ2b1x1_745491_tXrbHUsn/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-06_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_230222_TTUQ2b1x1_745491_tXrbHUsn/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-06_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_230222_TTUQ2b1x1_745491_tXrbHUsn/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-06_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_230222_TTUQ2b1x1_745491_tXrbHUsn/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-06_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_230222_TTUQ2b1x1_745491_tXrbHUsn/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=22, blended=7403, passed=90987
Got 90987 stars (including 83487 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 90987 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013024 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010419 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 948 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 929 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 88921 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 948 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 88917 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 88917 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.62"
Excluding outliers - 948 stars left (next iteration limit 1042)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-06_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_230222_TTUQ2b1x1_745491_tXrbHUsn/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-57-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-06_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_230222_TTUQ2b1x1_745491_tXrbHUsn/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-57-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-06_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_230222_TTUQ2b1x1_745491_tXrbHUsn/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:21:22.27 +19:43:07.6: 14.44 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:36:44.94 +21:03:13.4: 13.24 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:23:44.26 +25:47:48.2: 13.91 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:29:11.42 +19:06:26.9: 13.66 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:34:38.72 +19:17:23.6: 12.82 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:40:09.02 +22:08:35.8: 13.83 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:27:08.09 +25:53:03.5: 14.00 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:30:18.79 +18:26:49.0: 13.49 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:41:56.88 +22:06:51.2: 12.63 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:05:01.27 +19:41:49.0: 12.66 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:34:38.72 +19:17:23.6: 12.79 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:29:11.42 +19:06:26.9: 13.61 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:23:44.26 +25:47:48.2: 13.94 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:21:22.27 +19:43:07.6: 14.36 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:36:44.94 +21:03:13.4: 13.27 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:27:08.09 +25:53:03.5: 14.11 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.80 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.63 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.93 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:30:18.79 +18:26:49.0: 13.51 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:34:38.72 +19:17:23.6: ref_mag=12.80 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.1988 delta=-0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.25 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.39 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:29:11.42 +19:06:26.9: ref_mag=13.63 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.9326 delta=-0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:23:44.26 +25:47:48.2: ref_mag=13.93 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.0242 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:36:44.94 +21:03:13.4: ref_mag=13.25 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2848 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:21:22.27 +19:43:07.6: ref_mag=14.39 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.3543 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.05 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:40:09.02 +22:08:35.8: 13.90 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.50 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:27:08.09 +25:53:03.5: ref_mag=14.05 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.2807 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:30:18.79 +18:26:49.0: ref_mag=13.50 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.6430 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.87 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:40:09.02 +22:08:35.8: ref_mag=13.87 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.2346 delta=-0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:05:01.27 +19:41:49.0: 12.59 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.63 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:05:01.27 +19:41:49.0: ref_mag=12.63 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.9104 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:41:56.88 +22:06:51.2: 12.72 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.67 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:41:56.88 +22:06:51.2: ref_mag=12.67 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.0039 delta=-0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:37:29.45 +18:40:30.1: 12.54 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:42:10.06 +23:48:41.8: 12.67 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:34:44.46 +18:24:39.3: 12.77 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:37:29.45 +18:40:30.1: 12.57 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.56 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:37:29.45 +18:40:30.1: ref_mag=12.56 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.8823 delta=-0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:42:10.06 +23:48:41.8: 12.68 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.68 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:35:31.39 +22:07:20.6: 12.78 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:42:10.06 +23:48:41.8: ref_mag=12.68 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.9460 delta=-0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:34:44.46 +18:24:39.3: 12.69 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.73 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:34:44.46 +18:24:39.3: ref_mag=12.73 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.7513 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:35:31.39 +22:07:20.6: 12.70 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.73 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:35:31.39 +22:07:20.6: ref_mag=12.73 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.0396 delta=-0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:29:55.93 +23:17:51.8: 16.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:24:48.88 +18:03:36.1: 15.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:29:55.93 +23:17:51.8: 16.29 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:29:33.16 +20:12:13.8: 13.71 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:24:48.88 +18:03:36.1: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:29:33.16 +20:12:13.8: 13.84 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.77 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:29:33.16 +20:12:13.8: ref_mag=13.77 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7131 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:07:31.61 +24:54:39.3: 13.54 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:19:40.16 +21:05:53.7: 13.54 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:07:31.61 +24:54:39.3: 13.52 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.53 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:07:31.61 +24:54:39.3: ref_mag=13.53 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6744 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:09:29.46 +17:39:00.5: 13.26 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:18:39.12 +25:35:47.1: 13.86 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:19:40.16 +21:05:53.7: 13.72 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.61 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:19:40.16 +21:05:53.7: ref_mag=13.61 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8601 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:09:29.46 +17:39:00.5: 13.53 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.37 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:09:29.46 +17:39:00.5: ref_mag=13.37 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.8889 delta=-0.52 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:18:39.12 +25:35:47.1: 14.03 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:29:49.11 +20:17:54.3: 14.10 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.93 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:18:39.12 +25:35:47.1: ref_mag=13.93 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9796 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:29:49.11 +20:17:54.3: 14.30 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.19 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:29:49.11 +20:17:54.3: ref_mag=14.19 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0262 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:15:38.32 +19:51:30.2: 13.95 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:13:12.03 +26:11:51.4: 13.94 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:33:00.18 +20:55:15.4: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:15:38.32 +19:51:30.2: 13.97 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.96 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:15:38.32 +19:51:30.2: ref_mag=13.96 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9493 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:13:12.03 +26:11:51.4: 13.83 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.88 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:13:12.03 +26:11:51.4: ref_mag=13.88 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8631 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:33:00.18 +20:55:15.4: 16.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:39:25.62 +21:29:24.9: 14.20 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:31:13.42 +21:02:55.7: 14.43 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:31:22.50 +25:01:54.9: 14.35 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:39:25.62 +21:29:24.9: 13.93 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.02 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:39:25.62 +21:29:24.9: ref_mag=14.02 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.2543 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:30:10.62 +23:11:33.0: 16.17 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:35:13.18 +21:20:19.2: 16.16 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:14:46.98 +24:28:47.3: 14.88 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:31:13.42 +21:02:55.7: 14.43 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.43 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:31:13.42 +21:02:55.7: ref_mag=14.43 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.4187 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:31:22.50 +25:01:54.9: 14.33 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.34 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:28:00.37 +22:07:17.2: 14.62 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:31:22.50 +25:01:54.9: ref_mag=14.34 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.4335 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:30:10.62 +23:11:33.0: 16.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:35:13.18 +21:20:19.2: 16.20 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:14:46.98 +24:28:47.3: 14.89 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.88 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:14:46.98 +24:28:47.3: ref_mag=14.88 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.6047 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:28:00.37 +22:07:17.2: 14.37 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.47 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:28:00.37 +22:07:17.2: ref_mag=14.47 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.5881 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:25:46.46 +19:41:34.8: 14.79 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:28:37.42 +21:31:22.0: 15.24 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:27:39.13 +24:43:50.7: 15.08 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:25:46.46 +19:41:34.8: 15.04 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.89 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:25:46.46 +19:41:34.8: ref_mag=14.89 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.7682 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:28:37.42 +21:31:22.0: 15.11 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.17 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:28:37.42 +21:31:22.0: ref_mag=15.17 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.8274 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:27:39.13 +24:43:50.7: 15.26 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.16 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:27:39.13 +24:43:50.7: ref_mag=15.16 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.8279 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:10:39.32 +22:25:37.8: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:10:39.32 +22:25:37.8: 16.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out195794.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out195843.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out196046.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out196194.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out196212.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out89388.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 11s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 5s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195467_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 195467_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195490_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 195490_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195492_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 195492_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195503_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 195503_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195509_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 195509_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195521_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 195521_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:38:11.06 +20:05:24.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195523_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 195523_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195528_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 195528_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:32:01.85 +19:06:40.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195532_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 195532_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195535_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 195535_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195536_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 195536_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195538_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 195538_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195539_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 195539_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:33.03 +24:41:32.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195540_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 195540_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195541_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 195541_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195543_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023
Preparing report for the candidate 195543_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195544_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023
Preparing report for the candidate 195544_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195612_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 195612_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:19.25 +24:07:15.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195613_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 195613_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:41:24.39 +24:04:04.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195621_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 195621_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:25.18 +22:38:50.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195660_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 195660_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:25.39 +25:56:20.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195666_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 195666_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195667_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 195667_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:32:08.82 +23:56:52.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195700_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 195700_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195702_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 195702_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:11:55.66 +22:17:42.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195717_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 195717_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:31:54.35 +24:32:04.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195719_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 195719_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:15.37 +21:47:42.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195726_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 195726_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:14.88 +20:00:16.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195729_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 195729_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:50.88 +18:51:19.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195730_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 195730_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:55.47 +21:31:09.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195731_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 195731_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:29:20.37 +24:26:18.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195740_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 195740_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:22.46 +20:30:18.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195772_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 195772_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:41:33.16 +18:14:37.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195774_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 195774_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:20:30.46 +20:05:39.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195783_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 195783_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:34:37.68 +19:32:48.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195791_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 195791_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:34:29.97 +22:47:25.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195794_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023
Preparing report for the candidate 195794_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195801_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 195801_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:14:40.61 +20:31:56.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195802_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 195802_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:32:27.73 +22:47:24.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195813_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 195813_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:11.01 +20:06:30.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195815_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 195815_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:28:38.81 +24:17:04.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195818_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 195818_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:22:13.59 +22:40:19.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195842_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 195842_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:22:30.22 +22:57:32.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195843_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023
Preparing report for the candidate 195843_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195844_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 195844_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:22.96 +18:10:09.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195847_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 195847_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:27:03.73 +20:16:02.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195873_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 195873_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:10:22.65 +20:00:47.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195886_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 195886_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:51.72 +20:05:38.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195889_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 195889_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195894_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 195894_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:19:55.87 +20:49:18.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195906_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 195906_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:31:29.88 +22:53:12.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195913_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 195913_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:27:24.68 +19:09:59.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195915_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 195915_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:10:01.81 +21:27:59.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195921_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 195921_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195930_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 195930_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:24:29.39 +18:53:47.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195945_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 195945_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:15.74 +25:49:11.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195949_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 195949_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:30:28.11 +25:27:43.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195952_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 195952_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195955_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 195955_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:29:33.76 +23:02:48.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195962_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 195962_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:31:02.52 +25:10:30.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195963_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 195963_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:18:22.89 +17:52:04.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195968_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 195968_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195978_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 195978_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195980_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 195980_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:11:33.60 +22:39:39.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195983_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 195983_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:32:03.25 +17:51:57.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195988_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 195988_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195994_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 195994_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:27:30.99 +19:26:17.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196003_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 196003_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:24:12.10 +21:26:26.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196004_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 196004_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:14.52 +19:32:12.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196007_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 196007_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196015_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 196015_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:40.72 +21:21:32.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196020_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 196020_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196031_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 196031_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:08:42.64 +20:49:16.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196046_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023
Preparing report for the candidate 196046_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196047_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 196047_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:19:00.15 +20:18:07.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196057_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 196057_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:11:01.43 +18:18:04.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196061_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 196061_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:20:30.18 +22:26:10.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196076_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 196076_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:22.43 +21:13:56.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196086_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 196086_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:21:31.09 +25:14:47.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196094_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 196094_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:33:38.61 +26:01:04.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196097_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 196097_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:19:37.07 +24:45:27.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196109_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 196109_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:15:08.14 +21:35:23.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196111_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 196111_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:15:18.20 +18:00:28.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196131_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 196131_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196135_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 196135_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:20:22.81 +19:59:39.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196164_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 196164_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:22:25.55 +24:07:35.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196166_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 196166_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196186_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 196186_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:11:39.86 +20:41:33.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196189_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 196189_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196194_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023
Preparing report for the candidate 196194_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196212_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023
Preparing report for the candidate 196212_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196229_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 196229_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196257_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 196257_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196281_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 196281_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196317_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 196317_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196321_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 196321_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89388_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023
Preparing report for the candidate 89388_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 165521_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 165521_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-06_22-58-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
