This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_045255_TTUQ1b1x1_2908018_Yiw5P8pS
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 03.4109 2461163.9109 10.30 23:19:05.13 +49:03:32.7
107.75270 -11.07164 galactic And Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 4.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 23:19:05.13 +49:03:32.7 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 23:19:05.13 +49:03:32.7: 15.34 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 23:19:05.13 +49:03:32.7: 15.37 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 03.4109* 23 19 05.13 +49 03 32.7 10.3 U And 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461163.9109,10.30,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260503.4109 10.30CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 03.4109 2461163.9109 10.55 23:55:53.31 +53:43:44.7
114.68276 -8.25059 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.7" and 4.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | RR Cas | 23:55:48.95 +53:43:29.1 (Gaia DR3) | M (local) | 301.250000000000 (local) | Gaia3var=VARIABLE SpType: M5IIIe 1953GCRV..C......0W RR Cas
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 23:55:53.31 +53:43:44.7: 14.04 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 23:55:53.31 +53:43:44.7: 14.62 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.20 +/- 0.07
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 03.4109* 23 55 53.31 +53 43 44.7 10.6 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
RR Cas,2461163.9109,10.55,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
RR Cas 20260503.4109 10.55CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 03.4109 2461163.9109 11.24 23:52:42.53 +56:44:08.6
114.90716 -5.21821 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.6" and 4.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | DH Cas | 23:52:38.69 +56:44:36.0 (Gaia DR3) | M (local) | 2427942.00000 (local) | Gaia3var=VARIABLE SpType: C 1987Afz....26..209N NikC 1- 18
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 23:52:42.53 +56:44:08.6: 15.47 +/- 0.33 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 23:52:42.53 +56:44:08.6: 15.61 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.47 +/- 0.33
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 03.4109* 23 52 42.53 +56 44 08.6 11.2 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
DH Cas,2461163.9109,11.24,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
DH Cas 20260503.4109 11.24CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 03.4109 2461163.9109 9.93 23:15:37.73 +50:50:38.4
107.88013 -9.20637 galactic And Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.2" and 4.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 23:15:37.73 +50:50:38.4 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 23:15:37.73 +50:50:38.4: 14.44 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 23:15:37.73 +50:50:38.4: 14.65 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.53 +/- 0.13
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 03.4109* 23 15 37.73 +50 50 38.4 9.9 U And 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461163.9109,9.93,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260503.4109 9.93CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 03.4109 2461163.9109 10.47 00:37:21.18 +53:42:11.7
120.82168 -9.11078 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 4.9 pix
The object was found in VSX11" Q1996/076
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
11.400 V 13.000 V 2457335.00000 303.000000000000 M8
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 00:37:21.18 +53:42:11.7: 11.40 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 00:37:21.18 +53:42:11.7: 11.61 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.49 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 03.4109* 00 37 21.18 +53 42 11.7 10.5 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Q1996/076,2461163.9109,10.47,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Q1996/076 20260503.4109 10.47CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 03.4109 2461163.9109 11.86 23:46:50.14 +54:27:58.8
113.55337 -7.22482 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.8" and 4.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ATO J356.7085+54.4548 | 23:46:50.14 +54:27:58.8 (user input) | dubious (ATLAS) | (ATLAS) | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 23:46:50.14 +54:27:58.8: 15.60 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 23:46:50.14 +54:27:58.8: 15.72 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 03.4109* 23 46 50.14 +54 27 58.8 11.9 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J356.7085+54.4548,2461163.9109,11.86,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J356.7085+54.4548 20260503.4109 11.86CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 03.4109 2461163.9109 12.18 23:44:30.97 +53:34:16.2
112.99142 -8.00401 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 7.4" and 4.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 23:44:30.97 +53:34:16.2 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 23:44:30.97 +53:34:16.2: 15.62 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 23:44:30.97 +53:34:16.2: 15.72 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 03.4109* 23 44 30.97 +53 34 16.2 12.2 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461163.9109,12.18,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260503.4109 12.18CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 03.4109 2461163.9109 12.12 00:47:53.96 +58:03:05.6
122.46216 -4.81697 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 8.4" and 4.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 00:47:53.96 +58:03:05.6 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 00:47:53.96 +58:03:05.6: 14.59 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 00:47:53.96 +58:03:05.6: 15.11 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.75 +/- 0.14
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 03.4109* 00 47 53.96 +58 03 05.6 12.1 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461163.9109,12.12,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260503.4109 12.12CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 03.4109 2461163.9109 12.33 00:57:31.41 +57:31:28.9
123.75230 -5.33736 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 7.4" and 5.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ATO J014.3889+57.5316 | 00:57:31.41 +57:31:28.9 (user input) | dubious (ATLAS) | (ATLAS) | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 00:57:31.41 +57:31:28.9: 15.44 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 00:57:31.41 +57:31:28.9: 15.52 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 03.4109* 00 57 31.41 +57 31 28.9 12.3 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J014.3889+57.5316,2461163.9109,12.33,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J014.3889+57.5316 20260503.4109 12.33CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 03.4109 2461163.9109 12.84 00:49:18.26 +57:05:22.5
122.64063 -5.78096 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 7.3" and 5.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ATO J012.3264+57.0974 | 00:49:18.26 +57:05:22.5 (user input) | dubious (ATLAS) | (ATLAS) | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 00:49:18.26 +57:05:22.5: 13.76 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 00:49:18.26 +57:05:22.5: 14.15 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.90 +/- 0.07
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 03.4109* 00 49 18.26 +57 05 22.5 12.8 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J012.3264+57.0974,2461163.9109,12.84,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J012.3264+57.0974 20260503.4109 12.84CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 03.4109 2461163.9109 13.34 23:43:29.46 +51:58:01.2
112.41607 -9.51201 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 8.1" and 4.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 23:43:29.46 +51:58:01.2 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 23:43:29.46 +51:58:01.2: 15.74 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 23:43:29.46 +51:58:01.2: 15.81 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 03.4109* 23 43 29.46 +51 58 01.2 13.3 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461163.9109,13.34,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260503.4109 13.34CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 03.4109 2461163.9109 13.62 23:40:03.72 +52:09:24.2
111.95367 -9.18705 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 8.4" and 5.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ATO J355.0302+52.1647 | 23:40:03.72 +52:09:24.2 (user input) | dubious (ATLAS) | (ATLAS) | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 23:40:03.72 +52:09:24.2: 15.54 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 23:40:03.72 +52:09:24.2: 15.66 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 03.4109* 23 40 03.72 +52 09 24.2 13.6 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J355.0302+52.1647,2461163.9109,13.62,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J355.0302+52.1647 20260503.4109 13.62CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 03.4109 2461163.9109 10.86 23:38:25.04 +56:01:17.5
112.80369 -5.40762 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 7.9" and 4.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 23:38:25.04 +56:01:17.5 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 23:38:25.04 +56:01:17.5: 15.60 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 23:38:25.04 +56:01:17.5: 15.60 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 03.4109* 23 38 25.04 +56 01 17.5 10.9 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461163.9109,10.86,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260503.4109 10.86CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461036.58312155 27.12.2025 01:59:31.702 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
First image: 2461036.58312155 27.12.2025 01:59:31.702 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Last image: 2461163.91128672 03.05.2026 09:52:05.173 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_045255_TTUQ1b1x1_2908018_Yiw5P8pS/fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 9
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.96
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 27380
Objects passed selection criteria: 27300
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 20822.8
Average stars matched: 20348 (97.72 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 131288 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Apr 29 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-35-gf9552f12
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-29)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun May 3 04:54:14 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461036.58312155 27.12.2025 01:59:31.702 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
First image: 2461036.58312155 27.12.2025 01:59:31.702 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Last image: 2461163.91128672 03.05.2026 09:52:05.173 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_045255_TTUQ1b1x1_2908018_Yiw5P8pS/fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 278
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.63
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 72 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 190301
Objects passed selection criteria: 189928
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 160020
Average stars matched: 152429 (95.2565 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 2472976 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Apr 29 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-35-gf9552f12
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-29)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun May 3 05:06:15 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_045255_TTUQ1b1x1_2908018_Yiw5P8pS/fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-51-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0263.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_045255_TTUQ1b1x1_2908018_Yiw5P8pS/fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_045255_TTUQ1b1x1_2908018_Yiw5P8pS/fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-51-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0263.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_045255_TTUQ1b1x1_2908018_Yiw5P8pS/fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461163.91058462
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
'asassn_transients_list.txt' -> '../asassn_transients_list.txt'
'tns_transients_list.txt' -> '../tns_transients_list.txt'
wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits'
wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits'
wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-51-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0263.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-51-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0263.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-51-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0263.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-51-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0263.fits'
wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:01.845 +53:59:35.63 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-51-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0263.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-51-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0263.fits
Image size: 932.7'x619.3' 15.5(deg)x10.3(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.84"/pix along the X axis and 5.82"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:59:57.437 +54:02:28.46 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:00:01.845 +53:59:35.63
Second-epoch image center 23:59:57.437 +54:02:28.46
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0492 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
Image size: 932.8'x619.3' 15.5(deg)x10.3(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.84"/pix along the X axis and 5.82"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:00.071 +54:02:43.78 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:00:01.845 +53:59:35.63
Second-epoch image center 00:00:00.071 +54:02:43.78
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0524 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 23:59:57.437 +54:02:28.46
Second-epoch second image center 00:00:00.071 +54:02:43.78
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00772 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits &> /tmp/tmp.eJEJP6oduS
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Fq9Mgb01jG
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_045255_TTUQ1b1x1_2908018_Yiw5P8pS/fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-51-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0263.fits &> /tmp/tmp.96mG9h6lWm
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_045255_TTUQ1b1x1_2908018_Yiw5P8pS/fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-51-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0263.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_045255_TTUQ1b1x1_2908018_Yiw5P8pS/fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits &> /tmp/tmp.fpgwxjXzLY
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_045255_TTUQ1b1x1_2908018_Yiw5P8pS/fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits and wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits and wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits and wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 30002 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 0.0009 to 359.9993 deg, Dec +47.6490 to +59.3704 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 0.0009 to 359.9993 deg, Dec 47.6490 to 59.3704 deg
Loaded 163379 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 15843 out of 17844 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 17844 out of 30002 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.951200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.951200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.96
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.99
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.99
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 30002 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 0.0009 to 359.9993 deg, Dec +47.6490 to +59.3704 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 0.0009 to 359.9993 deg, Dec 47.6490 to 59.3704 deg
Loaded 163379 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 15843 out of 17844 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 17844 out of 30002 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits (aperture=6.7)
Read 29225 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 0.0002 to 359.9995 deg, Dec +47.7049 to +59.3705 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 0.0002 to 359.9995 deg, Dec 47.7049 to 59.3705 deg
Loaded 162590 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 14935 out of 16561 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 16561 out of 29225 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits (aperture=6.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 7 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.5 pix Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
2.1 pix Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
2.2 pix fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-51-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0263.fits
2.2 pix fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
2.5 pix wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.0 mag. Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
15.1 mag. Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-51-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0263.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.1 (SNR ) 11.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.eJEJP6oduS (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-03_CI_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_045255_TTUQ1b1x1_2908018_Yiw5P8pS/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits' -> 'wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=3597, passed=30002
Got 30002 stars (including 26372 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 30002 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 345.5133 through 0 to 15.4425, gap 15.4425 to 345.5133
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.6 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 953 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29070 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 345.5133 through 0 to 15.4430, gap 15.4430 to 345.5133
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.6 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29068 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29067 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Excluding outliers - 975 stars left (next iteration limit 1072)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits -region wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Fq9Mgb01jG (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-03_CI_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_045255_TTUQ1b1x1_2908018_Yiw5P8pS/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits' -> 'wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=3209, passed=29225
Got 29225 stars (including 25982 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 29225 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 345.4494 through 0 to 15.3164, gap 15.3164 to 345.4494
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 942 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27679 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 345.4490 through 0 to 15.3182, gap 15.3182 to 345.4490
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27676 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27675 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Excluding outliers - 976 stars left (next iteration limit 1073)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits -region wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.96mG9h6lWm (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-03_CI_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_045255_TTUQ1b1x1_2908018_Yiw5P8pS/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_045255_TTUQ1b1x1_2908018_Yiw5P8pS/fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-51-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0263.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_045255_TTUQ1b1x1_2908018_Yiw5P8pS/fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-51-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0263.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_045255_TTUQ1b1x1_2908018_Yiw5P8pS/fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-51-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0263.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_045255_TTUQ1b1x1_2908018_Yiw5P8pS/fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-51-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0263.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_045255_TTUQ1b1x1_2908018_Yiw5P8pS/fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-51-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0263.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_045255_TTUQ1b1x1_2908018_Yiw5P8pS/fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-51-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0263.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-51-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0263.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-51-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0263.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-51-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0263.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-51-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0263.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-51-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0263.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-51-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0263.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-51-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0263.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_045255_TTUQ1b1x1_2908018_Yiw5P8pS/fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-51-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0263.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-51-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0263.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=1, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1064, passed=12293
Got 12293 stars (including 11213 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-51-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0263.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 12293 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 932.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 932.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.012954 (46.6 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010363 (37.3 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 345.5476 through 0 to 15.5773, gap 15.5773 to 345.5476
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.8 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 458 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 350 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 269 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 6.21"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 330 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3488 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 7.76"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 345.5380 through 0 to 15.5922, gap 15.5922 to 345.5380
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.8 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 495 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 429 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3528 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 7.61"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 427 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4767 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 6.61"
Excluding outliers - 427 stars left (next iteration limit 363)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-51-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0263.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-51-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0263.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_045255_TTUQ1b1x1_2908018_Yiw5P8pS/fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-51-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0263.fits -region wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-51-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0263.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-51-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0263.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.fpgwxjXzLY (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-03_CI_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_045255_TTUQ1b1x1_2908018_Yiw5P8pS/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_045255_TTUQ1b1x1_2908018_Yiw5P8pS/fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_045255_TTUQ1b1x1_2908018_Yiw5P8pS/fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_045255_TTUQ1b1x1_2908018_Yiw5P8pS/fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_045255_TTUQ1b1x1_2908018_Yiw5P8pS/fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_045255_TTUQ1b1x1_2908018_Yiw5P8pS/fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_045255_TTUQ1b1x1_2908018_Yiw5P8pS/fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_045255_TTUQ1b1x1_2908018_Yiw5P8pS/fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=3, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1069, passed=12297
Got 12297 stars (including 11210 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 12297 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 932.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 932.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.012956 (46.6 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010364 (37.3 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 345.5476 through 0 to 15.5801, gap 15.5801 to 345.5476
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.8 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 456 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 350 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 257 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 5.98"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 330 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3313 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 7.02"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 345.5388 through 0 to 15.5917, gap 15.5917 to 345.5388
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.8 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 497 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 431 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3366 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 6.92"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 430 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4727 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 6.20"
Excluding outliers - 430 stars left (next iteration limit 363)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_045255_TTUQ1b1x1_2908018_Yiw5P8pS/fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits -region wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-51-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0263.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-51-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0263.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_045255_TTUQ1b1x1_2908018_Yiw5P8pS/wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-51-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0263.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_045255_TTUQ1b1x1_2908018_Yiw5P8pS/wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cas-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 23:55:53.31 +53:43:44.7: 14.04 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 23:52:42.53 +56:44:08.6: 15.47 +/- 0.33 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 23:19:05.13 +49:03:32.7: 15.34 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 23:15:37.73 +50:50:38.4: 14.44 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 00:37:21.18 +53:42:11.7: 11.40 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 23:55:53.31 +53:43:44.7: 14.62 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 23:19:05.13 +49:03:32.7: 15.37 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 23:52:42.53 +56:44:08.6: 15.61 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.20 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 23:55:53.31 +53:43:44.7: ref_mag=14.20 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=10.5513 delta=3.65 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.47 +/- 0.33
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 23:52:42.53 +56:44:08.6: ref_mag=15.47 +/- 0.33 new_mean_mag=11.2408 delta=4.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 23:15:37.73 +50:50:38.4: 14.65 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.53 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 23:15:37.73 +50:50:38.4: ref_mag=14.53 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=9.9336 delta=4.60 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 00:37:21.18 +53:42:11.7: 11.61 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.49 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 00:37:21.18 +53:42:11.7: ref_mag=11.49 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.4734 delta=1.02 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out14358.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out50486.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out51823.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out51831.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out51860.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 16s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51823_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
Preparing report for the candidate 51823_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51831_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
Preparing report for the candidate 51831_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51846_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 51846_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51860_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
Preparing report for the candidate 51860_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50486_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
Preparing report for the candidate 50486_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50199_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 50199_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14358_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
Preparing report for the candidate 14358_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 20s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cas-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
00:37:21.18 +53:42:11.7
23:15:37.73 +50:50:38.4
23:19:05.13 +49:03:32.7
23:55:53.31 +53:43:44.7
23:52:42.53 +56:44:08.6
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_045255_TTUQ1b1x1_2908018_Yiw5P8pS/fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-51-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0263.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_045255_TTUQ1b1x1_2908018_Yiw5P8pS/fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_045255_TTUQ1b1x1_2908018_Yiw5P8pS/fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-51-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0263.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_045255_TTUQ1b1x1_2908018_Yiw5P8pS/fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-51-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0263.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-51-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0263.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:01.845 +53:59:35.63 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-51-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0263.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-51-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0263.fits
Image size: 932.7'x619.3' 15.5(deg)x10.3(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.84"/pix along the X axis and 5.82"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:59:57.437 +54:02:28.46 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:00:01.845 +53:59:35.63
Second-epoch image center 23:59:57.437 +54:02:28.46
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0492 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
Image size: 932.8'x619.3' 15.5(deg)x10.3(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.84"/pix along the X axis and 5.82"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:00.071 +54:02:43.78 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:00:01.845 +53:59:35.63
Second-epoch image center 00:00:00.071 +54:02:43.78
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0524 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 23:59:57.437 +54:02:28.46
Second-epoch second image center 00:00:00.071 +54:02:43.78
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00772 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits &> /tmp/tmp.nvIO1lAvju
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits &> /tmp/tmp.dIPsFnTyP9
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_045255_TTUQ1b1x1_2908018_Yiw5P8pS/fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-51-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0263.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Q0Fkkkno82
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_045255_TTUQ1b1x1_2908018_Yiw5P8pS/fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-51-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0263.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_045255_TTUQ1b1x1_2908018_Yiw5P8pS/fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits &> /tmp/tmp.2t9qXtxnGl
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_045255_TTUQ1b1x1_2908018_Yiw5P8pS/fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits and wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits and wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits and wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 205184 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 0.0002 to 359.9998 deg, Dec +47.6490 to +59.3741 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 0.0002 to 359.9998 deg, Dec 47.6490 to 59.3741 deg
Loaded 163418 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 11964 out of 18942 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 18942 out of 205184 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.784150
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.784150
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.63
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.15
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.15
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 205184 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 0.0002 to 359.9998 deg, Dec +47.6490 to +59.3741 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 0.0002 to 359.9998 deg, Dec 47.6490 to 59.3741 deg
Loaded 163418 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 11964 out of 18942 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 18942 out of 205184 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits (aperture=5.0)
Read 217609 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 0.0001 to 359.9999 deg, Dec +47.6392 to +59.3793 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 0.0001 to 359.9999 deg, Dec 47.6392 to 59.3793 deg
Loaded 163629 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 11705 out of 17839 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 17839 out of 217609 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits (aperture=4.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 265 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
1.9 pix Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
2.1 pix fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-51-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0263.fits
2.1 pix fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
1.9 pix wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
15.2 mag. Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-51-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0263.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.2 (SNR ) 13.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.nvIO1lAvju (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-03_CI_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_045255_TTUQ1b1x1_2908018_Yiw5P8pS/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits' -> 'wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=77, blended=35015, passed=205107
Got 205107 stars (including 169770 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 205107 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 345.4449 through 0 to 15.4823, gap 15.4823 to 345.4449
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.6 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 959 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 201081 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 345.4447 through 0 to 15.4832, gap 15.4832 to 345.4447
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.6 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 201083 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 201083 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Excluding outliers - 971 stars left (next iteration limit 1068)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits -region wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.dIPsFnTyP9 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-03_CI_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_045255_TTUQ1b1x1_2908018_Yiw5P8pS/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits' -> 'wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=76, blended=32857, passed=217533
Got 217533 stars (including 184380 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 217533 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 345.4355 through 0 to 15.4567, gap 15.4567 to 345.4355
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.6 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 965 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 211865 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 345.4349 through 0 to 15.4584, gap 15.4584 to 345.4349
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.6 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 211865 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 211862 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Excluding outliers - 976 stars left (next iteration limit 1073)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits -region wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Q0Fkkkno82 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-03_CI_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_045255_TTUQ1b1x1_2908018_Yiw5P8pS/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_045255_TTUQ1b1x1_2908018_Yiw5P8pS/fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-51-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0263.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_045255_TTUQ1b1x1_2908018_Yiw5P8pS/fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-51-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0263.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_045255_TTUQ1b1x1_2908018_Yiw5P8pS/fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-51-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0263.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_045255_TTUQ1b1x1_2908018_Yiw5P8pS/fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-51-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0263.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_045255_TTUQ1b1x1_2908018_Yiw5P8pS/fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-51-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0263.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_045255_TTUQ1b1x1_2908018_Yiw5P8pS/fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-51-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0263.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-51-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0263.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-51-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0263.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-51-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0263.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-51-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0263.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-51-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0263.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-51-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0263.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-51-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0263.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_045255_TTUQ1b1x1_2908018_Yiw5P8pS/fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-51-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0263.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-51-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0263.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=2, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=19, blended=8393, passed=109766
Got 109766 stars (including 101188 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-51-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0263.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 109766 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 932.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 932.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.012954 (46.6 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010363 (37.3 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 345.4998 through 0 to 15.5773, gap 15.5773 to 345.4998
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.8 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 445 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 345 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 260 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 6.18"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 327 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33523 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 7.92"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 345.4863 through 0 to 15.5928, gap 15.5928 to 345.4863
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 493 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 429 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33581 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 7.91"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 424 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46182 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 5.48"
Excluding outliers - 424 stars left (next iteration limit 359)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-51-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0263.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-51-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0263.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_045255_TTUQ1b1x1_2908018_Yiw5P8pS/fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-51-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0263.fits -region wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-51-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0263.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-51-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0263.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.2t9qXtxnGl (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-03_CI_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_045255_TTUQ1b1x1_2908018_Yiw5P8pS/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_045255_TTUQ1b1x1_2908018_Yiw5P8pS/fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_045255_TTUQ1b1x1_2908018_Yiw5P8pS/fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_045255_TTUQ1b1x1_2908018_Yiw5P8pS/fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_045255_TTUQ1b1x1_2908018_Yiw5P8pS/fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_045255_TTUQ1b1x1_2908018_Yiw5P8pS/fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_045255_TTUQ1b1x1_2908018_Yiw5P8pS/fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_045255_TTUQ1b1x1_2908018_Yiw5P8pS/fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=19, blended=8622, passed=111296
Got 111296 stars (including 102496 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 111296 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 932.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 932.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.012956 (46.6 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010364 (37.3 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 345.5077 through 0 to 15.6100, gap 15.6100 to 345.5077
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.8 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 454 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 353 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 263 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 5.92"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 332 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33733 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 7.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 345.4965 through 0 to 15.6167, gap 15.6167 to 345.4965
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 497 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 431 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33793 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 7.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 429 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 47711 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 5.28"
Excluding outliers - 429 stars left (next iteration limit 365)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_045255_TTUQ1b1x1_2908018_Yiw5P8pS/fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits -region wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-51-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0263.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_045255_TTUQ1b1x1_2908018_Yiw5P8pS/wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-51-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0263.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_045255_TTUQ1b1x1_2908018_Yiw5P8pS/wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cas-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 00:06:28.77 +56:31:22.1: 13.66 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 00:06:28.77 +56:31:22.1: 13.94 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.76 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:06:28.77 +56:31:22.1: ref_mag=13.76 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.4263 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 23:46:50.14 +54:27:58.8: 15.60 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 00:31:05.02 +50:14:37.1: 11.70 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 00:47:53.96 +58:03:05.6: 14.59 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 23:46:50.14 +54:27:58.8: 15.72 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 00:31:05.02 +50:14:37.1: 11.76 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 23:44:30.97 +53:34:16.2: 15.62 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.73 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:31:05.02 +50:14:37.1: ref_mag=11.73 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.6534 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 00:47:53.96 +58:03:05.6: 15.11 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.75 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 00:47:53.96 +58:03:05.6: ref_mag=14.75 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=12.1131 delta=2.64 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 00:57:31.41 +57:31:28.9: 15.44 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 23:44:30.97 +53:34:16.2: 15.72 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 00:57:31.41 +57:31:28.9: 15.52 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 00:04:18.74 +54:17:11.7: 12.00 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 00:04:18.74 +54:17:11.7: 12.59 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.16 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:04:18.74 +54:17:11.7: ref_mag=12.16 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5054 delta=-0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 00:49:18.26 +57:05:22.5: 13.76 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 00:36:07.03 +57:18:41.5: 12.87 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 00:49:18.26 +57:05:22.5: 14.15 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.90 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 00:49:18.26 +57:05:22.5: ref_mag=13.90 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=12.8285 delta=1.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 00:36:07.03 +57:18:41.5: 12.92 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.89 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:36:07.03 +57:18:41.5: ref_mag=12.89 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8361 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 23:17:00.08 +53:36:40.7: 12.69 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 23:17:00.08 +53:36:40.7: 13.00 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.80 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:17:00.08 +53:36:40.7: ref_mag=12.80 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1490 delta=-0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 23:43:29.46 +51:58:01.2: 15.74 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 23:43:29.46 +51:58:01.2: 15.81 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 23:40:03.72 +52:09:24.2: 15.54 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 23:40:03.72 +52:09:24.2: 15.66 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 23:38:25.04 +56:01:17.5: 15.60 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 23:38:25.04 +56:01:17.5: 15.60 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out244063.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out244094.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out244108.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out244128.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out244262.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out244461.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out244659.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out65926.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 26s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 5s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243806_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 243806_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (52.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243807_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 243807_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243809_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 243809_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243814_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 243814_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243824_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 243824_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243831_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 243831_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243834_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 243834_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243843_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 243843_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243845_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 243845_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243851_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 243851_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243861_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 243861_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243864_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 243864_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243867_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 243867_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243871_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 243871_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243875_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 243875_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243879_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 243879_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243881_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 243881_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243883_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 243883_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243887_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 243887_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243888_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 243888_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243889_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 243889_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243895_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 243895_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243902_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 243902_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243904_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 243904_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243905_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 243905_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243906_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 243906_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243911_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 243911_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243913_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 243913_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243914_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 243914_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243915_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 243915_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243917_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 243917_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243921_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 243921_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243924_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 243924_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243925_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 243925_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243926_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 243926_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (40.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243928_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 243928_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243929_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 243929_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243932_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 243932_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243933_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 243933_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243937_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 243937_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (34.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243939_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 243939_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243940_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 243940_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243941_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 243941_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (34.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243942_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 243942_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243944_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 243944_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243946_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 243946_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243949_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 243949_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243950_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 243950_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243951_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 243951_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243952_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 243952_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243953_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 243953_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243954_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 243954_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244041_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244041_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244043_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244043_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244054_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244054_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244063_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
Preparing report for the candidate 244063_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244066_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244066_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244067_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244067_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244072_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244072_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244073_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244073_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (42.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244083_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244083_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244094_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
Preparing report for the candidate 244094_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244105_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244105_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244106_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244106_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:37:12.34 +53:53:52.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244108_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
Preparing report for the candidate 244108_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244113_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244113_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244117_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244117_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244121_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244121_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (41.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244126_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244126_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244128_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
Preparing report for the candidate 244128_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244129_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244129_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244138_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244138_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244140_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244140_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244149_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244149_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244153_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244153_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244156_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244156_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244159_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244159_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244170_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244170_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244171_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244171_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244175_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244175_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244176_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244176_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244177_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244177_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244187_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244187_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244188_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244188_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244190_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244190_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244192_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244192_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244193_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244193_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244194_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244194_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244199_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244199_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244200_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244200_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244201_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244201_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244202_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244202_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244211_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244211_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244212_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244212_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244222_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244222_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244226_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244226_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244230_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244230_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244237_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244237_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244240_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244240_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244242_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244242_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244246_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244246_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244253_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244253_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244261_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244261_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244262_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
Preparing report for the candidate 244262_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244267_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244267_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244268_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244268_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244270_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244270_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244279_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244279_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (36.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244289_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244289_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244295_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244295_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244296_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244296_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244300_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244300_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244305_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244305_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (32.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244306_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244306_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244308_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244308_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244317_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244317_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244319_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244319_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244320_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244320_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244324_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244324_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244325_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244325_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244331_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244331_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244333_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244333_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244337_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244337_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244339_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244339_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244345_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244345_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244346_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244346_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244350_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244350_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244352_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244352_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244354_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244354_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244355_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244355_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244357_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244357_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244359_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244359_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (31.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244364_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244364_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244368_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244368_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244369_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244369_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244372_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244372_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244373_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244373_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244374_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244374_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244377_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244377_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244378_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244378_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244387_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244387_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244388_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244388_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (31.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244390_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244390_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244394_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244394_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244396_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244396_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244397_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244397_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244399_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244399_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244400_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244400_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244402_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244402_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244403_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244403_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244404_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244404_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (37.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244409_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244409_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244410_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244410_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244413_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244413_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244419_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244419_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244427_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244427_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (34.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244434_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244434_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244437_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244437_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244441_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244441_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244443_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244443_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244446_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244446_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244448_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244448_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (41.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244452_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244452_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244457_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244457_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244459_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244459_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244460_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244460_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244461_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
Preparing report for the candidate 244461_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244463_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244463_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244465_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244465_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244467_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244467_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244468_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244468_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244469_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244469_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244471_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244471_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244472_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244472_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244473_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244473_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244482_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244482_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244484_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244484_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244485_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244485_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244488_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244488_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244489_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244489_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244490_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244490_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244495_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244495_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244502_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244502_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244503_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244503_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244510_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244510_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244514_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244514_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244524_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244524_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244525_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244525_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244526_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244526_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244527_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244527_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244528_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244528_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244531_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244531_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244532_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244532_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244535_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244535_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (31.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244543_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244543_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244557_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244557_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244558_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244558_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (38.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244564_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244564_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244573_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244573_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (32.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244576_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244576_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244577_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244577_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244579_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244579_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (34.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244582_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244582_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244585_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244585_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244587_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244587_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244594_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244594_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244596_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244596_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244597_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244597_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244600_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244600_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (48.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244603_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244603_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244608_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244608_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (34.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244621_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244621_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244622_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244622_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244633_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244633_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244634_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244634_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244636_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244636_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244640_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244640_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244643_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244643_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244655_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244655_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244659_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
Preparing report for the candidate 244659_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244661_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244661_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244668_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244668_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244669_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244669_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244672_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244672_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244674_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244674_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244677_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244677_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244679_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244679_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244680_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244680_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244681_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244681_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244683_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244683_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244686_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244686_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244689_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244689_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244697_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244697_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244713_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244713_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244720_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244720_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244722_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244722_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244725_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244725_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244732_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244732_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244754_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244754_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (62.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244759_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244759_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244768_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244768_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244774_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244774_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244791_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244791_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244795_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244795_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244799_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244799_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244803_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244803_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244821_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244821_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244834_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244834_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244844_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244844_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244852_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244852_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244865_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244865_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244866_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244866_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244876_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 244876_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (33.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217251_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 217251_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217596_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 217596_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (33.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 220200_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 220200_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65926_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
Preparing report for the candidate 65926_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 204719_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 204719_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:19:04.99 +49:03:30.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 219027_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 219027_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 49061_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 49061_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53446_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 53446_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73098_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 73098_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100070_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 100070_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:37:21.21 +53:42:08.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115746_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 115746_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:55:53.30 +53:43:41.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111302_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 111302_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-52-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
