This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_043910_TTUQ1b1x1_2106292_04jwp9BQ
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 03.4013 2461163.9013 11.19 14:13:17.41 +14:10:08.1
2.84857 66.93745 galactic Boo Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.2" and 6.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | Gaia DR3 1230198278478993408 | 14:13:16.91 +14:10:23.9 (Gaia DR3) | T | P | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-04-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0502.fits at 14:13:17.41 +14:10:08.1: 12.23 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 14:13:17.41 +14:10:08.1: 12.16 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.19 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 1230198278478993408,2461163.9013,11.19,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 1230198278478993408 20260503.4013 11.19CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 03.4013 2461163.9013 10.48 14:35:07.70 +09:37:15.3
2.26331 59.92751 galactic Boo Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 6.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | Gaia DR3 1176201399878011136 | 14:35:09.09 +09:36:58.8 (Gaia DR3) | T | P | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE SpType: M2 1947AnDea...5....1L DO 3518
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-04-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0502.fits at 14:35:07.70 +09:37:15.3: 11.79 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 14:35:07.70 +09:37:15.3: 11.76 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.78 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 1176201399878011136,2461163.9013,10.48,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 1176201399878011136 20260503.4013 10.48CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 03.4013 2461163.9013 11.06 14:43:37.74 +16:35:49.2
16.66935 62.00471 galactic Boo Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.7" and 6.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | Gaia DR3 1234665216265590144 | 14:43:38.96 +16:35:49.8 (Gaia DR3) | T | P | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE SpType: G2 (LAMOST DR5)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-04-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0502.fits at 14:43:37.74 +16:35:49.2: 12.03 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 14:43:37.74 +16:35:49.2: 11.99 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.01 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 1234665216265590144,2461163.9013,11.06,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 1234665216265590144 20260503.4013 11.06CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 03.4013 2461163.9013 11.06 14:12:24.47 +13:34:55.7
1.33831 66.74408 galactic Boo Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.6" and 6.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | Gaia DR3 1227069785645349760 | 14:12:22.87 +13:35:03.7 (Gaia DR3) | T | P | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-04-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0502.fits at 14:12:24.47 +13:34:55.7: 13.80 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 14:12:24.47 +13:34:55.7: 13.79 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.80 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 1227069785645349760,2461163.9013,11.06,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 1227069785645349760 20260503.4013 11.06CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 03.4013 2461163.9013 11.32 14:03:29.03 +16:05:54.3
3.17406 69.98846 galactic Boo Second-epoch detections are separated by 8.7" and 6.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | Gaia DR3 1231621596281061120 | 14:03:27.77 +16:06:10.8 (Gaia DR3) | T | P | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE SpType: G5 (LAMOST DR5)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-04-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0502.fits at 14:03:29.03 +16:05:54.3: 13.02 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 14:03:29.03 +16:05:54.3: 12.98 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.00 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 1231621596281061120,2461163.9013,11.32,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 1231621596281061120 20260503.4013 11.32CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 03.4013 2461163.9013 11.33 14:39:36.20 +09:50:16.7
3.95193 59.19859 galactic Boo Second-epoch detections are separated by 5.0" and 6.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | Gaia DR3 1174719876678981632 | 14:39:36.68 +09:49:59.8 (Gaia DR3) | T | P | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE SpType: F2 (LAMOST DR5)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-04-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0502.fits at 14:39:36.20 +09:50:16.7: 12.53 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 14:39:36.20 +09:50:16.7: 12.50 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.51 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 1174719876678981632,2461163.9013,11.33,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 1174719876678981632 20260503.4013 11.33CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 03.4013 2461163.9013 11.07 14:16:46.74 +09:18:49.0
355.47126 63.10818 galactic Boo Second-epoch detections are separated by 7.3" and 5.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | Gaia DR3 1176870551487100288 | 14:16:46.16 +09:18:11.6 (Gaia DR3) | ROT (local) | (local) | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE SpType: G4 (LAMOST DR5)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-04-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0502.fits at 14:16:46.74 +09:18:49.0: 12.89 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 14:16:46.74 +09:18:49.0: 12.80 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.84 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 1176870551487100288,2461163.9013,11.07,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 1176870551487100288 20260503.4013 11.07CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461120.96145624 21.03.2026 11:04:19.819 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-04-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0502.fits
First image: 2461120.96145624 21.03.2026 11:04:19.819 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-04-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0502.fits
Last image: 2461163.90171488 03.05.2026 09:38:18.166 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_043910_TTUQ1b1x1_2106292_04jwp9BQ/fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 8
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.58
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 6104
Objects passed selection criteria: 6067
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.4 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.4 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 3735.25
Average stars matched: 3642.75 (97.5236 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 112128 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Apr 29 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-35-gf9552f12
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-29)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun May 3 04:40:18 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461120.96145624 21.03.2026 11:04:19.819 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-04-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0502.fits
First image: 2461120.96145624 21.03.2026 11:04:19.819 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-04-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0502.fits
Last image: 2461163.90171488 03.05.2026 09:38:18.166 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_043910_TTUQ1b1x1_2106292_04jwp9BQ/fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 92
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.30
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 13 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 31137
Objects passed selection criteria: 31036
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.3 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.3 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 19370.8
Average stars matched: 18578.5 (95.9101 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 134580 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Apr 29 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-35-gf9552f12
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-29)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun May 3 04:41:50 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-04-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0502.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_043910_TTUQ1b1x1_2106292_04jwp9BQ/fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-37-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_043910_TTUQ1b1x1_2106292_04jwp9BQ/fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-04-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0502.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-04-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0502.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_043910_TTUQ1b1x1_2106292_04jwp9BQ/fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-37-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_043910_TTUQ1b1x1_2106292_04jwp9BQ/fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461163.90092052
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-04-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0502.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-04-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0502.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-04-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0502.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-04-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0502.fits'
wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits'
wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-37-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-37-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-37-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-37-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits'
wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-04-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0502.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-04-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0502.fits
Image size: 937.5'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:13:20.900 +13:59:55.74 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-37-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-37-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits
Image size: 942.1'x627.3' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:13:18.776 +13:54:53.46 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 14:13:20.900 +13:59:55.74
Second-epoch image center 14:13:18.776 +13:54:53.46
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0844 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257.fits
Image size: 942.1'x627.3' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:13:16.451 +13:55:13.12 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 14:13:20.900 +13:59:55.74
Second-epoch image center 14:13:16.451 +13:55:13.12
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0805 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 14:13:18.776 +13:54:53.46
Second-epoch second image center 14:13:16.451 +13:55:13.12
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01087 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-04-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0502.fits &> /tmp/tmp.L3tShKK98s
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-04-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0502.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits &> /tmp/tmp.fTMnM3WBWt
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_043910_TTUQ1b1x1_2106292_04jwp9BQ/fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-37-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits &> /tmp/tmp.6wXM1winII
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_043910_TTUQ1b1x1_2106292_04jwp9BQ/fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-37-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_043910_TTUQ1b1x1_2106292_04jwp9BQ/fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257.fits &> /tmp/tmp.vpnbIwQk7S
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_043910_TTUQ1b1x1_2106292_04jwp9BQ/fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-04-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0502.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-04-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0502.fits and wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-04-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0502.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-04-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0502.fits and wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-04-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0502.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-04-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0502.fits and wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-04-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0502.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-04-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0502.fits) and catalog (wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-04-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0502.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-04-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0502.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 6325 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 205.1536 to 221.6515 deg, Dec +8.5947 to +19.2660 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 205.1536 to 221.6515 deg, Dec 8.5947 to 19.2660 deg
Loaded 4004 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3233 out of 3334 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3334 out of 6325 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.912400
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.912400
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.58
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.33
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.33
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 6325 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 205.1536 to 221.6515 deg, Dec +8.5947 to +19.2660 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 205.1536 to 221.6515 deg, Dec 8.5947 to 19.2660 deg
Loaded 4004 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3233 out of 3334 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3334 out of 6325 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-04-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0502.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-04-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0502.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-04-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0502.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-04-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0502.fits (aperture=6.5)
Read 6391 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 205.1507 to 221.5537 deg, Dec +8.5947 to +19.2891 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 205.1507 to 221.5537 deg, Dec 8.5947 to 19.2891 deg
Loaded 3987 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3224 out of 3330 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3330 out of 6391 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits (aperture=6.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 8 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.4 pix Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-04-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0502.fits
2.4 pix Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
9.8 pix fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-37-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits
9.8 pix fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257.fits
2.4 pix wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-04-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0502.fits
2.4 pix wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-04-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0502.fits
15.3 mag. Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
12.7 mag. fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-37-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits
12.7 mag. fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 12.7 (SNR ) 10.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.L3tShKK98s (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-04-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0502.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-03_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_043910_TTUQ1b1x1_2106292_04jwp9BQ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-04-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0502.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-04-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0502.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-04-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0502.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-04-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0502.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-04-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0502.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-04-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0502.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-04-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0502.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-04-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0502.fits' -> 'wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-04-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0502.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-04-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0502.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-04-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0502.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-04-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0502.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-04-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0502.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-04-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0502.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-04-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0502.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-04-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0502.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-04-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0502.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-04-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0502.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-04-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0502.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=347, passed=6325
Got 6325 stars (including 5974 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-04-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0502.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6325 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 966 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6284 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6283 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6283 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Excluding outliers - 968 stars left (next iteration limit 1064)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-04-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0502.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-04-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0502.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-04-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0502.fits -region wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-04-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0502.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-04-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0502.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.fTMnM3WBWt (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-03_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_043910_TTUQ1b1x1_2106292_04jwp9BQ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits' -> 'wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=351, passed=6391
Got 6391 stars (including 6033 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6391 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 961 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6333 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6333 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6333 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 966 stars left (next iteration limit 1062)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits -region wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.6wXM1winII (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-03_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_043910_TTUQ1b1x1_2106292_04jwp9BQ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_043910_TTUQ1b1x1_2106292_04jwp9BQ/fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-37-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_043910_TTUQ1b1x1_2106292_04jwp9BQ/fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-37-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_043910_TTUQ1b1x1_2106292_04jwp9BQ/fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-37-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_043910_TTUQ1b1x1_2106292_04jwp9BQ/fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-37-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_043910_TTUQ1b1x1_2106292_04jwp9BQ/fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-37-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_043910_TTUQ1b1x1_2106292_04jwp9BQ/fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-37-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-37-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-37-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-37-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-37-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-37-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-37-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-37-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_043910_TTUQ1b1x1_2106292_04jwp9BQ/fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-37-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-37-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=215, passed=1235
Got 1235 stars (including 1020 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-37-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 1235 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013085 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010468 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 490 to 549 (Dec 8.1 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 960 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 953 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.62"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1223 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.63"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 490 to 549 (Dec 8.1 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1223 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.46"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1223 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.35"
Excluding outliers - 961 stars left (next iteration limit 1054)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-37-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-37-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_043910_TTUQ1b1x1_2106292_04jwp9BQ/fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-37-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits -region wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-37-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-37-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.vpnbIwQk7S (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-03_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_043910_TTUQ1b1x1_2106292_04jwp9BQ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_043910_TTUQ1b1x1_2106292_04jwp9BQ/fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_043910_TTUQ1b1x1_2106292_04jwp9BQ/fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_043910_TTUQ1b1x1_2106292_04jwp9BQ/fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_043910_TTUQ1b1x1_2106292_04jwp9BQ/fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_043910_TTUQ1b1x1_2106292_04jwp9BQ/fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_043910_TTUQ1b1x1_2106292_04jwp9BQ/fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_043910_TTUQ1b1x1_2106292_04jwp9BQ/fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=203, passed=1231
Got 1231 stars (including 1028 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 1231 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013085 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010468 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 490 to 549 (Dec 8.1 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 959 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 953 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.55"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1215 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.55"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 490 to 549 (Dec 8.1 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1214 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1214 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.23"
Excluding outliers - 960 stars left (next iteration limit 1053)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_043910_TTUQ1b1x1_2106292_04jwp9BQ/fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257.fits -region wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-37-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-37-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_043910_TTUQ1b1x1_2106292_04jwp9BQ/wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-37-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_043910_TTUQ1b1x1_2106292_04jwp9BQ/wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Boo-09-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03715_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 03715_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:14:04.68 +12:57:35.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 02350_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 02350_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:17:28.38 +15:15:46.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03674_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 03674_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:19:16.15 +13:00:17.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01758_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 01758_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:19:44.54 +16:18:22.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 00474_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 00474_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 13:54:41.32 +18:23:36.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01942_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 01942_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 13:49:29.04 +15:47:50.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01597_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 01597_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:40:43.23 +16:25:05.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03152_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 03152_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:41:08.36 +13:43:43.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Boo-09-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-04-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0502.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_043910_TTUQ1b1x1_2106292_04jwp9BQ/fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-37-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_043910_TTUQ1b1x1_2106292_04jwp9BQ/fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-04-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0502.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-04-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0502.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_043910_TTUQ1b1x1_2106292_04jwp9BQ/fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-37-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_043910_TTUQ1b1x1_2106292_04jwp9BQ/fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-04-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0502.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-37-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-04-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0502.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-37-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-04-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0502.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-04-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0502.fits
Image size: 937.5'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:13:20.900 +13:59:55.74 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-37-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-37-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits
Image size: 942.1'x627.3' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:13:18.776 +13:54:53.46 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 14:13:20.900 +13:59:55.74
Second-epoch image center 14:13:18.776 +13:54:53.46
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0844 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257.fits
Image size: 942.1'x627.3' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:13:16.451 +13:55:13.12 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 14:13:20.900 +13:59:55.74
Second-epoch image center 14:13:16.451 +13:55:13.12
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0805 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 14:13:18.776 +13:54:53.46
Second-epoch second image center 14:13:16.451 +13:55:13.12
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01087 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-04-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0502.fits &> /tmp/tmp.FWfmVO7oQX
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-04-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0502.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits &> /tmp/tmp.XZeDI3bCZt
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_043910_TTUQ1b1x1_2106292_04jwp9BQ/fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-37-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits &> /tmp/tmp.MY7k8RNmhZ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_043910_TTUQ1b1x1_2106292_04jwp9BQ/fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-37-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_043910_TTUQ1b1x1_2106292_04jwp9BQ/fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257.fits &> /tmp/tmp.RXruCVhZaz
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_043910_TTUQ1b1x1_2106292_04jwp9BQ/fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-04-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0502.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-04-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0502.fits and wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-04-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0502.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-04-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0502.fits and wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-04-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0502.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-04-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0502.fits and wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-04-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0502.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-04-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0502.fits) and catalog (wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-04-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0502.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-04-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0502.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 33967 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 205.1536 to 221.6515 deg, Dec +8.5913 to +19.2794 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 205.1536 to 221.6515 deg, Dec 8.5913 to 19.2794 deg
Loaded 4008 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3080 out of 3353 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3353 out of 33967 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.788850
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.788850
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.30
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.49
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.49
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 33967 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 205.1536 to 221.6515 deg, Dec +8.5913 to +19.2794 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 205.1536 to 221.6515 deg, Dec 8.5913 to 19.2794 deg
Loaded 4008 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3080 out of 3353 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3353 out of 33967 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-04-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0502.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-04-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0502.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-04-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0502.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-04-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0502.fits (aperture=5.0)
Read 33549 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 205.1507 to 221.6479 deg, Dec +8.5947 to +19.2891 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 205.1507 to 221.6479 deg, Dec 8.5947 to 19.2891 deg
Loaded 4015 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3085 out of 3342 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3342 out of 33549 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits (aperture=5.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 69 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-04-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0502.fits
2.2 pix Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
5.5 pix fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-37-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits
5.8 pix fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-04-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0502.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-04-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0502.fits
15.5 mag. Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
12.7 mag. fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-37-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits
12.6 mag. fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 12.6 (SNR ) 12.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.FWfmVO7oQX (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-04-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0502.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-03_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_043910_TTUQ1b1x1_2106292_04jwp9BQ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-04-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0502.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-04-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0502.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-04-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0502.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-04-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0502.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-04-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0502.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-04-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0502.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-04-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0502.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-04-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0502.fits' -> 'wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-04-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0502.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-04-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0502.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-04-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0502.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-04-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0502.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-04-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0502.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-04-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0502.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-04-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0502.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-04-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0502.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-04-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0502.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-04-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0502.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-04-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0502.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=1376, passed=33957
Got 33957 stars (including 32527 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-04-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0502.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 33957 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 962 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33715 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33715 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33715 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 967 stars left (next iteration limit 1063)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-04-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0502.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-04-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0502.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-04-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0502.fits -region wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-04-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0502.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-04-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0502.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.XZeDI3bCZt (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-03_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_043910_TTUQ1b1x1_2106292_04jwp9BQ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits' -> 'wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=15, blended=1378, passed=33534
Got 33534 stars (including 32104 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 33534 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 962 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33281 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33281 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33281 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 967 stars left (next iteration limit 1063)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits -region wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.MY7k8RNmhZ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-03_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_043910_TTUQ1b1x1_2106292_04jwp9BQ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_043910_TTUQ1b1x1_2106292_04jwp9BQ/fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-37-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_043910_TTUQ1b1x1_2106292_04jwp9BQ/fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-37-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_043910_TTUQ1b1x1_2106292_04jwp9BQ/fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-37-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_043910_TTUQ1b1x1_2106292_04jwp9BQ/fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-37-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_043910_TTUQ1b1x1_2106292_04jwp9BQ/fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-37-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_043910_TTUQ1b1x1_2106292_04jwp9BQ/fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-37-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-37-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-37-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-37-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-37-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-37-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-37-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-37-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_043910_TTUQ1b1x1_2106292_04jwp9BQ/fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-37-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-37-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=1, blended=1316, passed=5643
Got 5643 stars (including 4323 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-37-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5643 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013085 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010468 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 490 to 549 (Dec 8.1 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 954 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5584 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 490 to 549 (Dec 8.1 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5584 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.22"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5584 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.92"
Excluding outliers - 962 stars left (next iteration limit 1058)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-37-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-37-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_043910_TTUQ1b1x1_2106292_04jwp9BQ/fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-37-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits -region wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-37-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-37-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.RXruCVhZaz (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-03_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_043910_TTUQ1b1x1_2106292_04jwp9BQ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_043910_TTUQ1b1x1_2106292_04jwp9BQ/fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_043910_TTUQ1b1x1_2106292_04jwp9BQ/fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_043910_TTUQ1b1x1_2106292_04jwp9BQ/fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_043910_TTUQ1b1x1_2106292_04jwp9BQ/fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_043910_TTUQ1b1x1_2106292_04jwp9BQ/fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_043910_TTUQ1b1x1_2106292_04jwp9BQ/fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_043910_TTUQ1b1x1_2106292_04jwp9BQ/fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=1303, passed=5571
Got 5571 stars (including 4264 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5571 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013085 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010468 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 490 to 549 (Dec 8.1 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 956 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5497 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 490 to 549 (Dec 8.1 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5496 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.20"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5495 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.91"
Excluding outliers - 963 stars left (next iteration limit 1059)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_043910_TTUQ1b1x1_2106292_04jwp9BQ/fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257.fits -region wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-37-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_043910_TTUQ1b1x1_2106292_04jwp9BQ/wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-37-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_043910_TTUQ1b1x1_2106292_04jwp9BQ/wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Boo-09-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-04-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0502.fits at 14:00:08.62 +13:45:13.5: 12.24 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-04-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0502.fits at 14:25:21.45 +14:04:51.6: 12.14 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-04-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0502.fits at 13:41:51.45 +10:14:01.6: 12.53 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-04-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0502.fits at 13:42:53.48 +19:03:27.4: 12.42 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-04-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0502.fits at 14:09:07.35 +14:45:40.7: 11.27 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-04-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0502.fits at 14:09:33.91 +12:15:40.0: 12.44 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-04-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0502.fits at 14:16:32.69 +13:47:12.5: 11.18 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-04-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0502.fits at 14:09:31.88 +15:40:19.8: 11.40 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-04-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0502.fits at 14:11:39.29 +12:40:42.7: 11.95 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-04-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0502.fits at 13:46:46.63 +19:01:58.7: 12.11 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 14:00:08.62 +13:45:13.5: 12.21 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.22 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 14:16:32.69 +13:47:12.5: 11.20 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:00:08.62 +13:45:13.5: ref_mag=12.22 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9732 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 14:09:31.88 +15:40:19.8: 11.40 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 14:09:07.35 +14:45:40.7: 11.27 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 13:46:46.63 +19:01:58.7: 12.06 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 14:25:21.45 +14:04:51.6: 12.12 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 13:42:53.48 +19:03:27.4: 12.40 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.19 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 13:41:51.45 +10:14:01.6: 12.47 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:16:32.69 +13:47:12.5: ref_mag=11.19 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.5271 delta=-0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.27 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.40 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.08 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:09:07.35 +14:45:40.7: ref_mag=11.27 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.7056 delta=-0.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:09:31.88 +15:40:19.8: ref_mag=11.40 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.5531 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 14:11:39.29 +12:40:42.7: 11.93 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:46:46.63 +19:01:58.7: ref_mag=12.08 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.5776 delta=0.51 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.13 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.41 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 14:09:33.91 +12:15:40.0: 12.41 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:25:21.45 +14:04:51.6: ref_mag=12.13 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8383 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:42:53.48 +19:03:27.4: ref_mag=12.41 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8143 delta=0.59 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.50 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:41:51.45 +10:14:01.6: ref_mag=12.50 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8935 delta=0.61 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.94 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.42 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:11:39.29 +12:40:42.7: ref_mag=11.94 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9564 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:09:33.91 +12:15:40.0: ref_mag=12.42 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0288 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-04-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0502.fits at 13:48:30.11 +18:58:19.4: 11.74 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-04-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0502.fits at 13:44:26.54 +14:21:47.9: 11.56 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-04-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0502.fits at 14:41:42.62 +08:53:15.1: 11.51 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-04-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0502.fits at 13:41:59.17 +13:54:26.3: 11.52 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-04-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0502.fits at 14:41:39.36 +17:46:47.3: 11.74 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-04-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0502.fits at 14:44:51.87 +17:40:12.1: 11.88 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-04-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0502.fits at 13:45:32.22 +14:03:38.2: 11.90 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-04-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0502.fits at 14:40:30.47 +15:42:22.7: 11.61 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-04-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0502.fits at 13:45:29.44 +10:33:16.1: 11.58 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-04-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0502.fits at 14:43:22.49 +16:37:21.7: 11.45 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 13:44:26.54 +14:21:47.9: 11.54 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.55 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:44:26.54 +14:21:47.9: ref_mag=11.55 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.5177 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 13:48:30.11 +18:58:19.4: 11.73 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.74 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:48:30.11 +18:58:19.4: ref_mag=11.74 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.3391 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 13:41:59.17 +13:54:26.3: 11.49 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 14:40:30.47 +15:42:22.7: 11.63 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.50 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 14:41:42.62 +08:53:15.1: 11.48 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:41:59.17 +13:54:26.3: ref_mag=11.50 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.4831 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.62 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 13:45:29.44 +10:33:16.1: 11.58 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:40:30.47 +15:42:22.7: ref_mag=11.62 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.4311 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 14:44:51.87 +17:40:12.1: 11.87 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.49 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 13:45:32.22 +14:03:38.2: 11.97 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:41:42.62 +08:53:15.1: ref_mag=11.49 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.4696 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.58 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.87 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:45:29.44 +10:33:16.1: ref_mag=11.58 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.4295 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:44:51.87 +17:40:12.1: ref_mag=11.87 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.5790 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.94 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:45:32.22 +14:03:38.2: ref_mag=11.94 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.5989 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 14:43:22.49 +16:37:21.7: 11.44 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 14:41:39.36 +17:46:47.3: 11.75 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.44 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:43:22.49 +16:37:21.7: ref_mag=11.44 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.4369 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.75 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:41:39.36 +17:46:47.3: ref_mag=11.75 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.3784 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-04-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0502.fits at 13:42:03.47 +09:20:13.4: 11.55 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-04-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0502.fits at 13:42:37.60 +10:10:49.5: 11.40 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-04-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0502.fits at 14:39:38.52 +16:42:15.1: 11.49 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-04-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0502.fits at 13:42:02.00 +16:28:25.2: 11.58 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-04-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0502.fits at 13:46:41.25 +18:52:40.7: 11.49 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-04-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0502.fits at 14:42:42.98 +18:11:05.3: 11.62 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-04-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0502.fits at 14:39:26.50 +11:40:34.1: 11.40 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-04-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0502.fits at 14:13:17.41 +14:10:08.1: 12.23 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-04-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0502.fits at 14:40:59.05 +13:46:01.6: 11.16 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 13:42:03.47 +09:20:13.4: 11.54 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.55 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:42:03.47 +09:20:13.4: ref_mag=11.55 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.3252 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 14:39:38.52 +16:42:15.1: 11.54 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.51 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:39:38.52 +16:42:15.1: ref_mag=11.51 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.2680 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 13:42:02.00 +16:28:25.2: 11.61 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 13:46:41.25 +18:52:40.7: 11.45 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 13:42:37.60 +10:10:49.5: 11.40 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.59 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.47 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:42:02.00 +16:28:25.2: ref_mag=11.59 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.2933 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.40 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:46:41.25 +18:52:40.7: ref_mag=11.47 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.1501 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:42:37.60 +10:10:49.5: ref_mag=11.40 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.2535 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 14:42:42.98 +18:11:05.3: 11.59 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 14:39:26.50 +11:40:34.1: 11.38 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.60 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:42:42.98 +18:11:05.3: ref_mag=11.60 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.2314 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.39 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:39:26.50 +11:40:34.1: ref_mag=11.39 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.0531 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 14:40:59.05 +13:46:01.6: 11.15 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.15 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 14:13:17.41 +14:10:08.1: 12.16 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:40:59.05 +13:46:01.6: ref_mag=11.15 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.1707 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.19 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 14:13:17.41 +14:10:08.1: ref_mag=12.19 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.1830 delta=1.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-04-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0502.fits at 14:35:07.70 +09:37:15.3: 11.79 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-04-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0502.fits at 14:42:39.72 +09:18:23.7: 10.99 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-04-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0502.fits at 14:43:37.74 +16:35:49.2: 12.03 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-04-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0502.fits at 14:12:24.47 +13:34:55.7: 13.80 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 14:35:07.70 +09:37:15.3: 11.76 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-04-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0502.fits at 14:44:53.33 +17:16:01.1: 11.18 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.78 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 14:35:07.70 +09:37:15.3: ref_mag=11.78 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.4824 delta=1.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-04-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0502.fits at 14:44:46.68 +14:06:17.2: 11.49 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-04-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0502.fits at 14:03:29.03 +16:05:54.3: 13.02 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-04-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0502.fits at 14:34:52.32 +08:38:57.6: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 14:42:39.72 +09:18:23.7: 10.94 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.96 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:42:39.72 +09:18:23.7: ref_mag=10.96 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.6519 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 14:43:37.74 +16:35:49.2: 11.99 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.01 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 14:43:37.74 +16:35:49.2: ref_mag=12.01 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.0470 delta=0.96 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 14:12:24.47 +13:34:55.7: 13.79 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.80 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 14:12:24.47 +13:34:55.7: ref_mag=13.80 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=11.0612 delta=2.74 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 14:44:53.33 +17:16:01.1: 11.19 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.19 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:44:53.33 +17:16:01.1: ref_mag=11.19 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.0851 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-04-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0502.fits at 14:41:51.91 +09:53:51.8: 12.35 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 14:44:46.68 +14:06:17.2: 11.44 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.46 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:44:46.68 +14:06:17.2: ref_mag=11.46 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.0705 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 14:34:52.32 +08:38:57.6: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:34:52.32 +08:38:57.6: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 14:03:29.03 +16:05:54.3: 12.98 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.00 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 14:03:29.03 +16:05:54.3: ref_mag=13.00 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.3190 delta=1.68 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 14:41:51.91 +09:53:51.8: 12.26 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.30 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:41:51.91 +09:53:51.8: ref_mag=12.30 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.6694 delta=0.63 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-04-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0502.fits at 14:39:36.20 +09:50:16.7: 12.53 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-04-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0502.fits at 14:16:46.74 +09:18:49.0: 12.89 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-04-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0502.fits at 14:41:34.34 +10:46:01.7: 12.28 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-04-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0502.fits at 13:43:26.07 +11:06:51.8: 11.67 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 14:39:36.20 +09:50:16.7: 12.50 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.51 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 14:39:36.20 +09:50:16.7: ref_mag=12.51 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.3330 delta=1.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 14:16:46.74 +09:18:49.0: 12.80 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.84 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 14:16:46.74 +09:18:49.0: ref_mag=12.84 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.0761 delta=1.76 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 14:41:34.34 +10:46:01.7: 12.29 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.28 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:41:34.34 +10:46:01.7: ref_mag=12.28 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.5737 delta=0.71 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 13:43:26.07 +11:06:51.8: 11.66 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.67 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:43:26.07 +11:06:51.8: ref_mag=11.67 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.0151 delta=0.65 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out22294.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out26012.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52486.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52554.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52609.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52629.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52680.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 22s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52379_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 52379_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52383_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 52383_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52384_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 52384_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52385_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 52385_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52386_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 52386_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52388_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 52388_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52394_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 52394_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52401_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 52401_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52402_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 52402_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52405_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 52405_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52407_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 52407_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52416_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 52416_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52423_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 52423_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52424_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 52424_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52429_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 52429_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52431_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 52431_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52443_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 52443_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52447_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 52447_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52451_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 52451_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52460_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 52460_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52463_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 52463_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:43:26.17 +16:49:40.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52464_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 52464_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52466_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 52466_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52469_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 52469_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52472_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 52472_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:46:05.59 +17:59:34.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52478_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 52478_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52480_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 52480_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52483_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 52483_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52484_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 52484_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52485_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 52485_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52486_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257
Preparing report for the candidate 52486_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52487_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 52487_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52489_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 52489_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52492_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 52492_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52553_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 52553_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52554_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257
Preparing report for the candidate 52554_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52562_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 52562_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52568_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 52568_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:34:52.92 +08:38:44.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52584_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 52584_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52596_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 52596_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52609_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257
Preparing report for the candidate 52609_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52619_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 52619_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52629_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257
Preparing report for the candidate 52629_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52640_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 52640_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52662_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 52662_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52672_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 52672_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52680_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257
Preparing report for the candidate 52680_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52686_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 52686_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52772_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 52772_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 16781_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 16781_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:41:08.36 +13:43:44.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01852_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 01852_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 13:54:41.28 +18:23:37.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26983_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 26983_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 13:45:13.50 +10:19:31.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08616_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 08616_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:19:44.50 +16:18:23.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 19883_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 19883_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:19:16.16 +13:00:18.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26012_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257
Preparing report for the candidate 26012_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 29057_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 29057_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22294_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257
Preparing report for the candidate 22294_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 29505_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 29505_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20063_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 20063_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:14:04.66 +12:57:35.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12081_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 12081_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:17:28.36 +15:15:47.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14474_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 14474_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 13:58:39.94 +14:38:55.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26390_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 26390_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:14:50.68 +10:06:06.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01942_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 01942_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:38:13.59 +18:17:49.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03616_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 03616_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 13:53:13.11 +17:55:55.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 10255_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 10255_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 13:49:28.93 +15:47:52.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31839_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 31839_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:41:42.78 +11:39:37.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04976_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 04976_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 13:47:15.23 +17:27:24.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05811_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 05811_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:45:13.90 +16:57:49.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07741_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 07741_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-38-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
