This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_040225_TTUQ1b1x1_902669_pgxReWDp
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 03.3758 2461163.8758 9.91 12:30:50.63 +44:11:29.5
135.24640 72.44098 galactic CVn Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.5" and 5.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | Gaia DR3 1541447789552005120 | 12:30:52.97 +44:11:19.3 (Gaia DR3) | T | P | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE SpType: K2III 1962AJ.....67...37U NGP +44 115
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 12:30:50.63 +44:11:29.5: 10.97 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 12:30:50.63 +44:11:29.5: 11.00 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.98 +/- 0.00
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 1541447789552005120,2461163.8758,9.91,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 1541447789552005120 20260503.3758 9.91CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 03.3758 2461163.8758 11.95 12:35:52.71 +45:40:40.6
131.38694 71.19402 galactic CVn Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.9" and 5.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | Gaia DR3 1541965281570864896 | 12:35:54.53 +45:40:37.1 (Gaia DR3) | T | P | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE SpType: G5 (LAMOST DR5)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 12:35:52.71 +45:40:40.6: 13.06 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 12:35:52.71 +45:40:40.6: 13.07 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.07 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 1541965281570864896,2461163.8758,11.95,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 1541965281570864896 20260503.3758 11.95CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 03.3758 2461163.8758 11.26 12:13:51.36 +44:28:00.2
144.00289 71.09206 galactic CVn Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 5.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | Gaia DR3 1538514047714984704 | 12:13:53.65 +44:27:26.3 (Gaia DR3) | T | P | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 12:13:51.36 +44:28:00.2: 13.84 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 12:13:51.36 +44:28:00.2: 13.72 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.77 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 1538514047714984704,2461163.8758,11.26,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 1538514047714984704 20260503.3758 11.26CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 03.3758 2461163.8758 11.48 12:28:24.10 +47:56:28.8
133.59948 68.70696 galactic CVn Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.5" and 4.6 pix
The object was found in VSX20" Gaia DR3 1543964090636583296
Type: ROT
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.320 G 12.360 G G
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 12:28:24.10 +47:56:28.8: 13.42 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 12:28:24.10 +47:56:28.8: 13.32 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.36 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 1543964090636583296,2461163.8758,11.48,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 1543964090636583296 20260503.3758 11.48CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 03.3758 2461163.8758 11.29 12:27:20.31 +43:29:36.3
137.96152 72.92461 galactic CVn Second-epoch detections are separated by 8.6" and 5.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | Gaia DR3 1535508399537000832 | 12:27:22.86 +43:29:32.0 (Gaia DR3) | T | P | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 12:27:20.31 +43:29:36.3: 13.18 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 12:27:20.31 +43:29:36.3: 13.21 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.19 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 1535508399537000832,2461163.8758,11.29,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 1535508399537000832 20260503.3758 11.29CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 03.3758 2461163.8758 11.52 12:17:42.73 +42:32:28.1
144.78302 73.12661 galactic CVn Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.5" and 5.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | Gaia DR3 1538071636019224960 | 12:17:44.61 +42:32:03.2 (Gaia DR3) | T | P | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE SpType: G5III 1962AJ.....67...37U NGP +43 98
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 12:17:42.73 +42:32:28.1: 14.18 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 12:17:42.73 +42:32:28.1: 14.25 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.22 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 1538071636019224960,2461163.8758,11.52,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 1538071636019224960 20260503.3758 11.52CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 03.3758 2461163.8758 11.58 12:08:32.69 +45:35:28.6
144.93195 69.66101 galactic UMa Second-epoch detections are separated by 4.4" and 5.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ATO J182.1393+45.5790 | 12:08:34.43 +45:35:06.7 (Gaia DR3) | dubious (ATLAS) | (ATLAS) | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 12:08:32.69 +45:35:28.6: 13.71 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 12:08:32.69 +45:35:28.6: 13.68 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.70 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 03.3758* 12 08 32.69 +45 35 28.6 11.6 U UMa 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J182.1393+45.5790,2461163.8758,11.58,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J182.1393+45.5790 20260503.3758 11.58CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 03.3758 2461163.8758 11.64 12:30:49.67 +41:51:28.8
137.59514 74.67828 galactic CVn Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.7" and 5.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | Gaia DR3 1534848074085244032 | 12:30:51.04 +41:51:17.8 (Gaia DR3) | T | P | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 12:30:49.67 +41:51:28.8: 12.56 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 12:30:49.67 +41:51:28.8: 12.55 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.56 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 1534848074085244032,2461163.8758,11.64,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 1534848074085244032 20260503.3758 11.64CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 03.3758 2461163.8758 11.87 12:13:09.15 +50:05:30.2
138.07366 65.89595 galactic CVn Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.3" and 5.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | Gaia DR3 1548124333395972992 | 12:13:12.50 +50:05:59.1 (Gaia DR3) | T | P | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE SpType: F8 (LAMOST DR5)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 12:13:09.15 +50:05:30.2: 13.05 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 12:13:09.15 +50:05:30.2: 13.09 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.07 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 1548124333395972992,2461163.8758,11.87,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 1548124333395972992 20260503.3758 11.87CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 03.3758 2461163.8758 11.63 12:31:20.38 +44:56:03.0
134.34852 71.74590 galactic CVn Second-epoch detections are separated by 4.4" and 4.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ATO J187.8533+44.9390 | 12:31:23.08 +44:55:57.8 (Gaia DR3) | dubious (ATLAS) | (ATLAS) | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE SpType: F5 (LAMOST DR5)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 12:31:20.38 +44:56:03.0: 13.99 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 12:31:20.38 +44:56:03.0: 13.94 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.97 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J187.8533+44.9390,2461163.8758,11.63,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J187.8533+44.9390 20260503.3758 11.63CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 03.3758 2461163.8758 11.76 12:05:34.43 +50:32:23.0
140.33307 65.01071 galactic UMa Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.6" and 4.5 pix
The object was found in VSX 5" SN 2009dd
Type: SN
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 12:05:34.43 +50:32:23.0: 12.84 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 12:05:34.43 +50:32:23.0: 12.80 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.82 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 03.3758* 12 05 34.43 +50 32 23.0 11.8 U UMa 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
SN 2009dd,2461163.8758,11.76,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
SN 2009dd 20260503.3758 11.76CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 03.3758 2461163.8758 10.79 12:28:11.26 +44:05:42.8
136.85009 72.39927 galactic CVn Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 5.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | Large-amplitude variable Gaia DR2 1535629723772881024 | 12:28:11.26 +44:05:42.8 (user input) | 2021A&A...648A..44M | | (position from user input) (the VSX policy as of May 2022 seems to be NOT to regard variables from 2021A&A...648A..44M as 'known' for the lack of classification) SpType: A7IV (LAMOST DR5)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 12:28:11.26 +44:05:42.8: 11.77 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 12:28:11.26 +44:05:42.8: 11.78 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.77 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Large-amplitude variable Gaia DR2 1535629723772881024,2461163.8758,10.79,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Large-amplitude variable Gaia DR2 1535629723772881024 20260503.3758 10.79CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461119.75437483 20.03.2026 06:06:07.985 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits
First image: 2461119.75437483 20.03.2026 06:06:07.985 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits
Last image: 2461163.87614106 03.05.2026 09:01:28.588 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_040225_TTUQ1b1x1_902669_pgxReWDp/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 7
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.47
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 6384
Objects passed selection criteria: 6353
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.4 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.4 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 4036
Average stars matched: 3951.75 (97.9125 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 112316 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Apr 29 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-35-gf9552f12
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-29)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun May 3 04:06:38 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461119.75437483 20.03.2026 06:06:07.985 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits
First image: 2461119.75437483 20.03.2026 06:06:07.985 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits
Last image: 2461163.87614106 03.05.2026 09:01:28.588 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_040225_TTUQ1b1x1_902669_pgxReWDp/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 88
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.24
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 8 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 28001
Objects passed selection criteria: 27910
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.4 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.4 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 18001.8
Average stars matched: 17331.5 (96.2768 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 131452 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Apr 29 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-35-gf9552f12
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-29)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun May 3 04:08:15 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_040225_TTUQ1b1x1_902669_pgxReWDp/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-00-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_040225_TTUQ1b1x1_902669_pgxReWDp/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_040225_TTUQ1b1x1_902669_pgxReWDp/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-00-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_040225_TTUQ1b1x1_902669_pgxReWDp/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461163.87546162
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits'
wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits'
wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-00-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-00-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-00-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-00-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits'
wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:59:59.794 +45:59:50.79 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-00-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-00-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Image size: 942.2'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:00:08.905 +45:55:32.83 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:59:59.794 +45:59:50.79
Second-epoch image center 12:00:08.905 +45:55:32.83
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0764 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
Image size: 942.3'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:00:11.729 +45:55:35.17 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:59:59.794 +45:59:50.79
Second-epoch image center 12:00:11.729 +45:55:35.17
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0790 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 12:00:08.905 +45:55:32.83
Second-epoch second image center 12:00:11.729 +45:55:35.17
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00821 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits &> /tmp/tmp.3AmjKrtCbi
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits &> /tmp/tmp.QgWJ1aITdq
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_040225_TTUQ1b1x1_902669_pgxReWDp/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-00-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits &> /tmp/tmp.p958oab1Mc
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_040225_TTUQ1b1x1_902669_pgxReWDp/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-00-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_040225_TTUQ1b1x1_902669_pgxReWDp/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235.fits &> /tmp/tmp.gUw8h21D48
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_040225_TTUQ1b1x1_902669_pgxReWDp/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits and wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits and wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits and wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.cat) found
'wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 6666 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 167.9173 to 192.3674 deg, Dec +40.1391 to +51.2476 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 167.9173 to 192.3674 deg, Dec 40.1391 to 51.2476 deg
Loaded 3765 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2801 out of 2905 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 2905 out of 6666 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.954000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.954000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.47
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.48
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.48
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 6666 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 167.9173 to 192.3674 deg, Dec +40.1391 to +51.2476 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 167.9173 to 192.3674 deg, Dec 40.1391 to 51.2476 deg
Loaded 3765 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2801 out of 2905 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 2905 out of 6666 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits (aperture=6.6)
Read 6678 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 167.9174 to 192.3674 deg, Dec +40.1391 to +51.2477 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 167.9174 to 192.3674 deg, Dec 40.1391 to 51.2477 deg
Loaded 3764 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2798 out of 2905 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 2905 out of 6678 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits (aperture=6.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 5 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.4 pix UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits
2.4 pix UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits
8.2 pix fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-00-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
8.4 pix fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
2.4 pix wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits
2.4 pix wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits
15.5 mag. UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits
13.0 mag. fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-00-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
13.0 mag. fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.0 (SNR ) 10.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.3AmjKrtCbi (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_040225_TTUQ1b1x1_902669_pgxReWDp/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=353, passed=6666
Got 6666 stars (including 6308 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6666 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 650 to 708 (Dec 40.1 to 51.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 971 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6622 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 650 to 708 (Dec 40.1 to 51.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6622 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6622 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 974 stars left (next iteration limit 1071)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits -region wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.QgWJ1aITdq (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_040225_TTUQ1b1x1_902669_pgxReWDp/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=357, passed=6678
Got 6678 stars (including 6317 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6678 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 650 to 708 (Dec 40.1 to 51.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 971 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6639 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 650 to 708 (Dec 40.1 to 51.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6640 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6640 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 974 stars left (next iteration limit 1071)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits -region wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.p958oab1Mc (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_040225_TTUQ1b1x1_902669_pgxReWDp/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_040225_TTUQ1b1x1_902669_pgxReWDp/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-00-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_040225_TTUQ1b1x1_902669_pgxReWDp/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-00-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_040225_TTUQ1b1x1_902669_pgxReWDp/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-00-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_040225_TTUQ1b1x1_902669_pgxReWDp/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-00-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_040225_TTUQ1b1x1_902669_pgxReWDp/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-00-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_040225_TTUQ1b1x1_902669_pgxReWDp/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-00-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-00-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-00-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-00-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-00-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-00-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-00-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-00-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_040225_TTUQ1b1x1_902669_pgxReWDp/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-00-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-00-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=164, passed=1493
Got 1493 stars (including 1329 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-00-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 1493 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013086 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010469 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 648 to 708 (Dec 39.8 to 51.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 965 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 954 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.92"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1465 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.96"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 648 to 708 (Dec 39.8 to 51.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 965 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1467 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.80"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1467 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.72"
Excluding outliers - 965 stars left (next iteration limit 1061)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-00-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-00-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_040225_TTUQ1b1x1_902669_pgxReWDp/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-00-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-00-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-00-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.gUw8h21D48 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_040225_TTUQ1b1x1_902669_pgxReWDp/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_040225_TTUQ1b1x1_902669_pgxReWDp/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_040225_TTUQ1b1x1_902669_pgxReWDp/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_040225_TTUQ1b1x1_902669_pgxReWDp/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_040225_TTUQ1b1x1_902669_pgxReWDp/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_040225_TTUQ1b1x1_902669_pgxReWDp/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_040225_TTUQ1b1x1_902669_pgxReWDp/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_040225_TTUQ1b1x1_902669_pgxReWDp/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=163, passed=1483
Got 1483 stars (including 1320 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 1483 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013088 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010470 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 39.9 to 51.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 965 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 957 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.93"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1463 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.96"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 39.9 to 51.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 965 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1463 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.80"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1463 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.73"
Excluding outliers - 965 stars left (next iteration limit 1061)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_040225_TTUQ1b1x1_902669_pgxReWDp/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-00-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-00-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_040225_TTUQ1b1x1_902669_pgxReWDp/wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-00-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_040225_TTUQ1b1x1_902669_pgxReWDp/wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-11-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 12:30:50.63 +44:11:29.5: 10.97 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 12:30:50.63 +44:11:29.5: 11.00 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.98 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 12:30:50.63 +44:11:29.5: ref_mag=10.98 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=9.9164 delta=1.06 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20311.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 16s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20311_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235
Preparing report for the candidate 20311_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01466_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 01466_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:02:05.89 +43:02:54.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04347_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 04347_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:46:03.15 +47:46:44.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05254_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 05254_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:19:47.98 +48:59:00.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 00663_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 00663_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:33:42.44 +41:21:42.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 17s
Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-11-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
12:30:50.63 +44:11:29.5
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_040225_TTUQ1b1x1_902669_pgxReWDp/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-00-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_040225_TTUQ1b1x1_902669_pgxReWDp/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_040225_TTUQ1b1x1_902669_pgxReWDp/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-00-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_040225_TTUQ1b1x1_902669_pgxReWDp/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-00-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-00-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:59:59.794 +45:59:50.79 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-00-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-00-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Image size: 942.2'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:00:08.905 +45:55:32.83 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:59:59.794 +45:59:50.79
Second-epoch image center 12:00:08.905 +45:55:32.83
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0764 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
Image size: 942.3'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:00:11.729 +45:55:35.17 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:59:59.794 +45:59:50.79
Second-epoch image center 12:00:11.729 +45:55:35.17
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0790 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 12:00:08.905 +45:55:32.83
Second-epoch second image center 12:00:11.729 +45:55:35.17
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00821 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits &> /tmp/tmp.p6bO2qTR7d
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits &> /tmp/tmp.aPW45SlKMr
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_040225_TTUQ1b1x1_902669_pgxReWDp/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-00-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits &> /tmp/tmp.U8GpB7TgPK
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_040225_TTUQ1b1x1_902669_pgxReWDp/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-00-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_040225_TTUQ1b1x1_902669_pgxReWDp/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235.fits &> /tmp/tmp.JqJZD9GQKc
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_040225_TTUQ1b1x1_902669_pgxReWDp/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits and wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits and wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits and wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.cat) found
'wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 29946 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 167.8345 to 192.4258 deg, Dec +40.1391 to +51.2778 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 167.8345 to 192.4258 deg, Dec 40.1391 to 51.2778 deg
Loaded 3792 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2686 out of 2907 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 2907 out of 29946 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.857450
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.857450
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.24
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.62
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.62
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 29946 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 167.8345 to 192.4258 deg, Dec +40.1391 to +51.2778 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 167.8345 to 192.4258 deg, Dec 40.1391 to 51.2778 deg
Loaded 3792 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2686 out of 2907 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 2907 out of 29946 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits (aperture=5.3)
Read 30011 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 167.8350 to 192.4261 deg, Dec +40.1391 to +51.2775 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 167.8350 to 192.4261 deg, Dec 40.1391 to 51.2775 deg
Loaded 3792 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2687 out of 2905 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 2905 out of 30011 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits (aperture=5.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 57 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits
2.2 pix UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits
5.6 pix fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-00-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
5.7 pix fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
2.3 pix wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits
2.2 pix wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits
15.6 mag. UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits
13.1 mag. fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-00-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
13.1 mag. fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.1 (SNR ) 12.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.p6bO2qTR7d (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_040225_TTUQ1b1x1_902669_pgxReWDp/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=18, blended=1201, passed=29928
Got 29928 stars (including 28681 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 29928 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 650 to 708 (Dec 40.1 to 51.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 977 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 971 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29770 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 650 to 708 (Dec 40.1 to 51.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 977 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29769 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29769 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 977 stars left (next iteration limit 1074)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits -region wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.aPW45SlKMr (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_040225_TTUQ1b1x1_902669_pgxReWDp/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=17, blended=1184, passed=29994
Got 29994 stars (including 28767 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 29994 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 650 to 708 (Dec 40.1 to 51.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 970 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29827 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 650 to 708 (Dec 40.1 to 51.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29828 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29828 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 976 stars left (next iteration limit 1073)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits -region wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.U8GpB7TgPK (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_040225_TTUQ1b1x1_902669_pgxReWDp/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_040225_TTUQ1b1x1_902669_pgxReWDp/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-00-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_040225_TTUQ1b1x1_902669_pgxReWDp/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-00-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_040225_TTUQ1b1x1_902669_pgxReWDp/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-00-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_040225_TTUQ1b1x1_902669_pgxReWDp/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-00-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_040225_TTUQ1b1x1_902669_pgxReWDp/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-00-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_040225_TTUQ1b1x1_902669_pgxReWDp/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-00-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-00-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-00-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-00-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-00-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-00-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-00-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-00-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_040225_TTUQ1b1x1_902669_pgxReWDp/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-00-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-00-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=1210, passed=6601
Got 6601 stars (including 5384 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-00-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6601 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013086 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010469 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 648 to 708 (Dec 39.7 to 51.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 958 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.87"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6556 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.90"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 648 to 708 (Dec 39.7 to 51.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6556 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.85"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6556 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.64"
Excluding outliers - 963 stars left (next iteration limit 1059)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-00-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-00-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_040225_TTUQ1b1x1_902669_pgxReWDp/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-00-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-00-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-00-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.JqJZD9GQKc (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_040225_TTUQ1b1x1_902669_pgxReWDp/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_040225_TTUQ1b1x1_902669_pgxReWDp/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_040225_TTUQ1b1x1_902669_pgxReWDp/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_040225_TTUQ1b1x1_902669_pgxReWDp/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_040225_TTUQ1b1x1_902669_pgxReWDp/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_040225_TTUQ1b1x1_902669_pgxReWDp/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_040225_TTUQ1b1x1_902669_pgxReWDp/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_040225_TTUQ1b1x1_902669_pgxReWDp/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=1184, passed=6560
Got 6560 stars (including 5374 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6560 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013088 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010470 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 648 to 708 (Dec 39.8 to 51.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 961 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.85"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6529 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.89"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 648 to 708 (Dec 39.8 to 51.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6529 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.84"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6529 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.62"
Excluding outliers - 964 stars left (next iteration limit 1060)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_040225_TTUQ1b1x1_902669_pgxReWDp/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-00-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_040225_TTUQ1b1x1_902669_pgxReWDp/wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-00-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_040225_TTUQ1b1x1_902669_pgxReWDp/wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-11-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 11:19:32.06 +42:51:10.9: 12.69 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 12:02:46.45 +47:05:51.2: 11.76 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 12:46:55.60 +48:51:33.5: 12.09 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 12:35:52.71 +45:40:40.6: 13.06 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 12:45:29.67 +47:34:49.2: 11.86 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 12:46:04.27 +49:16:50.5: 12.15 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 11:49:35.48 +45:44:44.5: 12.51 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 12:42:27.75 +46:32:37.8: 12.50 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 11:23:10.52 +49:41:38.6: 12.02 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 12:02:46.45 +47:05:51.2: 11.75 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 12:35:52.71 +45:40:40.6: 13.07 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 11:19:32.06 +42:51:10.9: 12.70 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 12:46:55.60 +48:51:33.5: 12.07 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 12:45:29.67 +47:34:49.2: 11.83 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.07 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.75 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.69 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.08 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 11:49:35.48 +45:44:44.5: 12.50 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 12:35:52.71 +45:40:40.6: ref_mag=13.07 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9519 delta=1.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:02:46.45 +47:05:51.2: ref_mag=11.75 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.9646 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:46:55.60 +48:51:33.5: ref_mag=12.08 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9484 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:19:32.06 +42:51:10.9: ref_mag=12.69 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4974 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.85 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:45:29.67 +47:34:49.2: ref_mag=11.85 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8261 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.51 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 12:42:36.20 +45:56:24.1: 11.64 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 12:46:04.27 +49:16:50.5: 12.15 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:49:35.48 +45:44:44.5: ref_mag=12.51 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4598 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 12:42:27.75 +46:32:37.8: 12.51 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.15 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:46:04.27 +49:16:50.5: ref_mag=12.15 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8373 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.51 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:42:27.75 +46:32:37.8: ref_mag=12.51 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9910 delta=0.52 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 11:23:10.52 +49:41:38.6: 11.99 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.01 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:23:10.52 +49:41:38.6: ref_mag=12.01 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8176 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 12:42:36.20 +45:56:24.1: 11.68 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.65 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:42:36.20 +45:56:24.1: ref_mag=11.65 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.7078 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 11:30:36.05 +42:03:59.6: 11.44 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 12:42:59.26 +48:44:48.6: 12.12 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 11:20:42.98 +43:46:43.1: 11.76 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 12:40:39.76 +49:35:57.1: 11.61 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 11:30:36.05 +42:03:59.6: 11.42 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.43 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 12:13:51.36 +44:28:00.2: 13.84 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:30:36.05 +42:03:59.6: ref_mag=11.43 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.7586 delta=-0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 12:40:39.76 +49:35:57.1: 11.56 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 12:42:59.26 +48:44:48.6: 12.13 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.58 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 12:46:05.64 +48:13:13.5: 12.08 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:40:39.76 +49:35:57.1: ref_mag=11.58 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.5300 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.12 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:42:59.26 +48:44:48.6: ref_mag=12.12 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9600 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 11:20:42.98 +43:46:43.1: 11.77 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.77 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:20:42.98 +43:46:43.1: ref_mag=11.77 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7638 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 12:28:24.10 +47:56:28.8: 13.42 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 12:13:51.36 +44:28:00.2: 13.72 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.77 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 12:13:51.36 +44:28:00.2: ref_mag=13.77 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=11.2571 delta=2.51 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 12:27:20.31 +43:29:36.3: 13.18 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 12:46:05.64 +48:13:13.5: 12.09 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.09 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:46:05.64 +48:13:13.5: ref_mag=12.09 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.4526 delta=0.63 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 12:17:42.73 +42:32:28.1: 14.18 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 12:28:24.10 +47:56:28.8: 13.32 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.36 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 12:28:24.10 +47:56:28.8: ref_mag=13.36 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.4836 delta=1.88 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 12:08:32.69 +45:35:28.6: 13.71 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 12:30:49.67 +41:51:28.8: 12.56 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 12:27:20.31 +43:29:36.3: 13.21 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 12:26:56.46 +41:33:44.7: 12.38 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.19 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 12:27:20.31 +43:29:36.3: ref_mag=13.19 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.2811 delta=1.91 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 12:17:42.73 +42:32:28.1: 14.25 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.22 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 12:17:42.73 +42:32:28.1: ref_mag=14.22 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=11.5173 delta=2.70 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 12:13:09.15 +50:05:30.2: 13.05 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 12:08:32.69 +45:35:28.6: 13.68 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.70 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 12:08:32.69 +45:35:28.6: ref_mag=13.70 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.5750 delta=2.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 12:30:49.67 +41:51:28.8: 12.55 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.56 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 12:30:49.67 +41:51:28.8: ref_mag=12.56 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.6097 delta=0.95 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 12:26:56.46 +41:33:44.7: 12.41 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.39 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:26:56.46 +41:33:44.7: ref_mag=12.39 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.5770 delta=0.81 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 12:13:09.15 +50:05:30.2: 13.09 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.07 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 12:13:09.15 +50:05:30.2: ref_mag=13.07 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8657 delta=1.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 12:31:20.38 +44:56:03.0: 13.99 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 12:31:20.38 +44:56:03.0: 13.94 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.97 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 12:31:20.38 +44:56:03.0: ref_mag=13.97 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=11.5704 delta=2.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 12:05:34.43 +50:32:23.0: 12.84 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 12:05:34.43 +50:32:23.0: 12.80 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.82 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 12:05:34.43 +50:32:23.0: ref_mag=12.82 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7610 delta=1.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 12:28:11.26 +44:05:42.8: 11.77 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 12:28:11.26 +44:05:42.8: 11.78 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.77 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 12:28:11.26 +44:05:42.8: ref_mag=11.77 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.7897 delta=0.98 (need > 0.90)
util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out09805.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out19756.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32013.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32146.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32165.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32173.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32181.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32190.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32195.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32225.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32239.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 23s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 8s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31976_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 31976_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31977_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 31977_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31978_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 31978_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32003_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 32003_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32004_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 32004_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32005_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 32005_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:27:14.14 +40:25:58.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32010_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 32010_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32013_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235
Preparing report for the candidate 32013_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32030_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 32030_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32032_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 32032_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32035_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 32035_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:42:09.51 +48:48:20.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32036_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 32036_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32043_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 32043_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32046_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 32046_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32049_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 32049_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32054_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 32054_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32058_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 32058_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32059_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 32059_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32065_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 32065_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32070_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 32070_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32075_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 32075_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32087_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 32087_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:38:46.11 +40:52:29.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32096_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 32096_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:38:36.95 +41:00:25.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32118_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 32118_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:38:33.78 +40:52:14.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32123_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 32123_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:17:40.24 +50:55:56.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32146_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235
Preparing report for the candidate 32146_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32150_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 32150_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:37:31.35 +40:31:05.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32159_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 32159_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32160_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 32160_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:18:12.65 +41:01:48.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32165_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235
Preparing report for the candidate 32165_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32166_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 32166_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:39:20.41 +41:25:26.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32173_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235
Preparing report for the candidate 32173_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32181_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235
Preparing report for the candidate 32181_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32182_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 32182_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:37:06.10 +41:05:58.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32190_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235
Preparing report for the candidate 32190_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32193_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 32193_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32195_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235
Preparing report for the candidate 32195_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32200_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 32200_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32214_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 32214_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32225_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235
Preparing report for the candidate 32225_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32230_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 32230_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32234_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 32234_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:37:46.69 +40:11:17.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32236_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 32236_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32239_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235
Preparing report for the candidate 32239_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32250_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 32250_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32252_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 32252_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31526_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 31526_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 19756_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235
Preparing report for the candidate 19756_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03142_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 03142_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:30:36.06 +41:38:38.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05630_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 05630_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:02:05.86 +43:02:54.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09805_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235
Preparing report for the candidate 09805_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 28910_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 28910_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:46:03.13 +47:46:45.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25289_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 25289_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:19:47.99 +48:59:00.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07511_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 07511_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:38:20.66 +43:37:35.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 06431_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 06431_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:30:31.37 +43:10:28.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 02406_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 02406_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:33:42.43 +41:21:42.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07520_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 07520_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_04-01-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
