Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 05 03.3580  2461163.8580  13.72  10:29:21.77 +53:20:17.8
158.10038  52.96812 galactic  UMa  Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.5" and 0.4 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
 online_id        | target                       | 10:29:21.77 +53:20:17.8 (user input)  | T                | P                    |  (position from user input)                                                  
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 10:29:21.77 +53:20:17.8:  16.10 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 10:29:21.77 +53:20:17.8:  16.05 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits


fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-32-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0223.fits


fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits

# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_033910_TTUQ1b1x1_67635_7gxUS99O/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-32-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0223.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_033910_TTUQ1b1x1_67635_7gxUS99O/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i ;done
# Display the solved FITS images
ds9 -frame lock wcs  wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits  wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-32-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0223.fits -crosshair 9133.00293 3495.00220 image    wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits -crosshair 9132.63574 3494.98340 image   

./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_033910_TTUQ1b1x1_67635_7gxUS99O/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-32-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0223.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_033910_TTUQ1b1x1_67635_7gxUS99O/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits  && util/transients/search_for_transients_single_field.sh

REFERENCE_IMAGES=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs  util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_033910_TTUQ1b1x1_67635_7gxUS99O

Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code! The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter. Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code. The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:

     TAU0008  C2026 05 03.35797 10 29 21.77 +53 20 17.8          13.7 R      V36

Position measured on individual images:

     TAU0008  C2026 05 03.35599 10 29 21.87 +53 20 18.7          13.7 R      V36
     TAU0008  C2026 05 03.35994 10 29 21.68 +53 20 16.9          13.8 R      V36

You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services:
MPChecker (in case the button does not work)
NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets)
sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work)
fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)

Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP. Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!

TCP 2026 05 03.3580*  10 29 21.77 +53 20 17.8  13.7 U             UMa       9 0

Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!

 **** AAVSO file format ****

#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461163.8580,13.72,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS


 **** VSNET file format ****

# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829   <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746    12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732    12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260503.3580 13.72CV NMW


The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs

The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to  vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp

Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 05 03.3580  2461163.8580  14.16  11:56:14.04 +58:02:31.7
136.56193  57.60138 galactic  UMa  Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.1" and 0.4 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
 online_id        | target                       | 11:56:14.04 +58:02:31.7 (user input)  | T                | P                    |  (position from user input)                                                  
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 11:56:14.04 +58:02:31.7:  16.09 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 11:56:14.04 +58:02:31.7:  16.02 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits


fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-32-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0223.fits


fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits

# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_033910_TTUQ1b1x1_67635_7gxUS99O/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-32-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0223.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_033910_TTUQ1b1x1_67635_7gxUS99O/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i ;done
# Display the solved FITS images
ds9 -frame lock wcs  wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits  wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-32-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0223.fits -crosshair 1913.37292 287.01141 image    wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits -crosshair 1912.99121 287.01779 image   

./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_033910_TTUQ1b1x1_67635_7gxUS99O/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-32-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0223.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_033910_TTUQ1b1x1_67635_7gxUS99O/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits  && util/transients/search_for_transients_single_field.sh

REFERENCE_IMAGES=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs  util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_033910_TTUQ1b1x1_67635_7gxUS99O

Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code! The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter. Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code. The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:

     TAU0008  C2026 05 03.35797 11 56 14.04 +58 02 31.7          14.2 R      V36

Position measured on individual images:

     TAU0008  C2026 05 03.35599 11 56 13.91 +58 02 31.5          14.2 R      V36
     TAU0008  C2026 05 03.35994 11 56 14.17 +58 02 31.9          14.1 R      V36

You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services:
MPChecker (in case the button does not work)
NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets)
sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work)
fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)

Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP. Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!

TCP 2026 05 03.3580*  11 56 14.04 +58 02 31.7  14.2 U             UMa       9 0

Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!

 **** AAVSO file format ****

#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461163.8580,14.16,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS


 **** VSNET file format ****

# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829   <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746    12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732    12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260503.3580 14.16CV NMW


The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs

The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to  vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp

## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref.  image: 2461083.81439950 12.02.2026 07:32:34.117   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
First image: 2461083.81439950 12.02.2026 07:32:34.117   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
Last  image: 2461163.85993942 03.05.2026 08:38:08.766   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_033910_TTUQ1b1x1_67635_7gxUS99O/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.46
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA  10.0             # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH   10.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL     55000.0         # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN            0.37            # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times):  6719
Objects passed selection criteria:  6695
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max):    2.8    2.0    2    4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max):    2.8    2.0    2    4
Average stars detected per image: 4889.75
Average stars matched: 4737.25 (96.8812 %)
Memory usage VmPeak:   112588 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on  Wed Apr 29 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number  1.0rc89-35-gf9552f12
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-29)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on  Sun May  3 03:40:12 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref.  image: 2461083.81439950 12.02.2026 07:32:34.117   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
First image: 2461083.81439950 12.02.2026 07:32:34.117   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
Last  image: 2461163.85993942 03.05.2026 08:38:08.766   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_033910_TTUQ1b1x1_67635_7gxUS99O/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 65
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.20
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 11 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA  2.0             # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH   3.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL     57000.0         # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN            0.83            # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times):  33679
Objects passed selection criteria:  33581
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max):    2.9    2.0    2    4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max):    2.9    2.0    2    4
Average stars detected per image: 25751.2
Average stars matched: 24895.5 (96.6769 %)
Memory usage VmPeak:   135824 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on  Wed Apr 29 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number  1.0rc89-35-gf9552f12
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-29)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on  Sun May  3 03:41:22 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.0
FLAT_FIELD_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-04-22_multinight.fit
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 8000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 4000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 3.5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
UMa-07-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting UMa-07-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing UMa-07-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 944972 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 944972 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 

Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:

MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes


renamed 'UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-32-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0223.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-32-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0223.fits_preview.png'

UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-32-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0223.fits


renamed 'UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits_preview.png'

UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits




Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK
Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK
Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK
Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold.
----------------------------------------------
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 482.1649
INFO:         REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 505.6775
INFO:    SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 2865.5861
INFO:            SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 711.0700
INFO:   SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 2906.9242
INFO:           SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 716.6600
----------------------------------------------
INFO:      ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 5.94317
INFO:                  SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.008
----------------------------------------------
Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-04-22_multinight.fit
EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP=                 -5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP=                 -4.9 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP =      12.289999961853 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP =                 10.2 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_033910_TTUQ1b1x1_67635_7gxUS99O/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-32-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0223.fits 
CCD-TEMP= -4.900000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_033910_TTUQ1b1x1_67635_7gxUS99O/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-32-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0223.fits
SET-TEMP= -5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_033910_TTUQ1b1x1_67635_7gxUS99O/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-32-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0223.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE  =                    T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX  =                   16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS   =                    2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1  =                 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2  =                 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO   =                32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND  =                    T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT'              / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE=                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-05-03T03:32:27.6178143' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-05-03T08:32:27.6178143' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS =     61163.3558751969 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-05-03T08:32:37.5213984' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG =     61163.3559898264 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING=                    1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING=                    1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN    =                   30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET  =                   30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M'            / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP=                 -5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP=                 -4.9 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0'             / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT=                   50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1'       / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN=                135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO=                  2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA      =     169.407944767388 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC     =      53.999865086496 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT =     33.5763888888889 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ  =             316.2375 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS =     1.80424649683063 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East'               / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV=               1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT =     33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG=    -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky'         / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview'        / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= ''                   / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL  = 'Simulator'          / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER  = 'CV'                 / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT  = 'UMa-07'             / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '11 17 39'           / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+54 00 00'          / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT=                  0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser'        / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS  =                29446 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS=                29446 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ =                  0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP =      12.289999961853 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM=      12.289999961853 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT=                  3.9 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY=                 65.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE=                904.4 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP =                 10.2 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR =                 82.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST=            11.200896 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD =             7.200576 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN'           / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX =               2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP =            20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP  =              13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP  =           20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL =               6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF =             235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET =           20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM =                    T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0=             3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_033910_TTUQ1b1x1_67635_7gxUS99O/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-32-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0223.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= -5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_033910_TTUQ1b1x1_67635_7gxUS99O/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-32-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0223.fits
SET-TEMP= -5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-22.fit
CCD-TEMP= -4.900000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_033910_TTUQ1b1x1_67635_7gxUS99O/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-32-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0223.fits
CCD-TEMP= -5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-22.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-22.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_033910_TTUQ1b1x1_67635_7gxUS99O/d_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-32-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0223.fits :)

Spent 0.502788 seconds 
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-22.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_033910_TTUQ1b1x1_67635_7gxUS99O/d_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-32-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0223.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-04-22_multinight.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 37850.569222
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_033910_TTUQ1b1x1_67635_7gxUS99O/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-32-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0223.fits :)


No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24504.0, right_median=28262.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-04-22_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_033910_TTUQ1b1x1_67635_7gxUS99O/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-32-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0223.fits
EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP=                 -5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP=                 -5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP =      12.289999961853 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP =                 10.2 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_033910_TTUQ1b1x1_67635_7gxUS99O/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits 
CCD-TEMP= -5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_033910_TTUQ1b1x1_67635_7gxUS99O/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits
SET-TEMP= -5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_033910_TTUQ1b1x1_67635_7gxUS99O/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE  =                    T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX  =                   16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS   =                    2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1  =                 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2  =                 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO   =                32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND  =                    T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT'              / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE=                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-05-03T03:38:08.7669413' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-05-03T08:38:08.7669413' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS =     61163.3598236805 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-05-03T08:38:18.6708599' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG =       61163.35993831 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING=                    1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING=                    1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN    =                   30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET  =                   30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M'            / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP=                 -5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP=                 -5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0'             / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT=                   50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1'       / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN=                135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO=                  2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA      =     169.407945123979 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC     =     53.9998649321182 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT =     32.7563888888889 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ  =     316.469444444444 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS =     1.84393600850777 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East'               / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV=               1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT =     33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG=    -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky'         / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview'        / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= ''                   / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL  = 'Simulator'          / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER  = 'CV'                 / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT  = 'UMa-07'             / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '11 17 39'           / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+54 00 00'          / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT=                  0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser'        / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS  =                29463 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS=                29463 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ =                  0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP =      12.289999961853 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM=      12.289999961853 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT=                  3.9 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY=                 65.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE=                904.4 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP =                 10.2 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR =                 82.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST=            11.200896 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD =             7.200576 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN'           / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX =               2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP =            20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP  =              13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP  =           20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL =               6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF =             235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET =           20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM =                    T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0=             3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_033910_TTUQ1b1x1_67635_7gxUS99O/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= -5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_033910_TTUQ1b1x1_67635_7gxUS99O/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits
SET-TEMP= -5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-22.fit
CCD-TEMP= -5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_033910_TTUQ1b1x1_67635_7gxUS99O/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits
CCD-TEMP= -5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-22.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-22.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_033910_TTUQ1b1x1_67635_7gxUS99O/d_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits :)

Spent 0.494044 seconds 
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-22.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_033910_TTUQ1b1x1_67635_7gxUS99O/d_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-04-22_multinight.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 37850.569222
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_033910_TTUQ1b1x1_67635_7gxUS99O/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits :)


No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24504.0, right_median=28262.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-04-22_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_033910_TTUQ1b1x1_67635_7gxUS99O/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits
Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:



Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:



after the calibration attempt:
SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_033910_TTUQ1b1x1_67635_7gxUS99O/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-32-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0223.fits
SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_033910_TTUQ1b1x1_67635_7gxUS99O/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits
Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:


fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-32-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0223.fits



fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits




Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1

  ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_033910_TTUQ1b1x1_67635_7gxUS99O/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-32-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0223.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_033910_TTUQ1b1x1_67635_7gxUS99O/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits
  
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_033910_TTUQ1b1x1_67635_7gxUS99O/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-32-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0223.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_033910_TTUQ1b1x1_67635_7gxUS99O/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461163.85599094
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits'
wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits'
wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-32-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0223.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-32-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0223.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-32-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0223.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-32-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0223.fits'
wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.0'  15.7(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:17:34.763 +53:59:49.75 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-32-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0223.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-32-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0223.fits
Image size: 941.8'x626.8'  15.7(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:17:45.024 +53:56:23.99 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:17:34.763 +53:59:49.75
Second-epoch image center 11:17:45.024 +53:56:23.99
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0624 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg.  Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits
Image size: 941.9'x626.8'  15.7(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:17:44.801 +53:56:23.58 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:17:34.763 +53:59:49.75
Second-epoch image center 11:17:44.801 +53:56:23.58
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0623 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center  11:17:45.024 +53:56:23.99
Second-epoch second image center 11:17:44.801 +53:56:23.58
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00056 deg.
###################################
ERROR: no shift applied between second-epoch images! The distance between image centers is 0.00056 deg. (min. required shift: 0.00164 deg.)
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits &> /tmp/tmp.uVIu3g9kty
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits &> /tmp/tmp.JEqXCcuylA
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_033910_TTUQ1b1x1_67635_7gxUS99O/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-32-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0223.fits &> /tmp/tmp.g3WzPM8N5K
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_033910_TTUQ1b1x1_67635_7gxUS99O/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-32-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0223.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_033910_TTUQ1b1x1_67635_7gxUS99O/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits &> /tmp/tmp.hMw0Fnpe1X
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_033910_TTUQ1b1x1_67635_7gxUS99O/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits and wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat 
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits and wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat 
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits and wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat) found
'wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 6848 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 154.0172 to 183.7564 deg, Dec +47.5541 to +59.4177 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 154.0172 to 183.7564 deg, Dec 47.5541 to 59.4177 deg
Loaded 5290 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3503 out of 3676 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3676 out of 6848 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.936100
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.936100
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.46
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.48

Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed!  =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.48

Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:


Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 6848 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 154.0172 to 183.7564 deg, Dec +47.5541 to +59.4177 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 154.0172 to 183.7564 deg, Dec 47.5541 to 59.4177 deg
Loaded 5290 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3503 out of 3676 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3676 out of 6848 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits (aperture=6.1)
Read 6962 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 154.0172 to 183.7788 deg, Dec +47.6710 to +59.4178 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 154.0172 to 183.7788 deg, Dec 47.6710 to 59.4178 deg
Loaded 5256 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3492 out of 3674 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3674 out of 6962 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits (aperture=6.4)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering.  (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
 2.0 pix  UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
 2.3 pix  UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
 2.4 pix  fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-32-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0223.fits
 2.8 pix  fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits
 2.0 pix  wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
 2.3 pix  wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
 15.5 mag.  UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
 15.5 mag.  UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
 14.2 mag.  fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-32-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0223.fits
 14.0 mag.  fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate:  14.0 (SNR )  11.3 (80% of stars)  with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of  following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). 
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. 
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.uVIu3g9kty (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_033910_TTUQ1b1x1_67635_7gxUS99O/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=466, passed=6848
Got 6848 stars (including 6376 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6848 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 687 to 749 (Dec 47.6 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 953 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6761 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 687 to 749 (Dec 47.6 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6761 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6761 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" 
Excluding outliers - 970 stars left (next iteration limit 1067)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits -region wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.JEqXCcuylA (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_033910_TTUQ1b1x1_67635_7gxUS99O/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.cat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=475, passed=6962
Got 6962 stars (including 6476 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.cat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6962 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 749 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 956 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6886 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 749 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6890 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6890 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" 
Excluding outliers - 968 stars left (next iteration limit 1064)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits -region wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.g3WzPM8N5K (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_033910_TTUQ1b1x1_67635_7gxUS99O/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_033910_TTUQ1b1x1_67635_7gxUS99O/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-32-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0223.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_033910_TTUQ1b1x1_67635_7gxUS99O/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-32-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0223.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_033910_TTUQ1b1x1_67635_7gxUS99O/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-32-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0223.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_033910_TTUQ1b1x1_67635_7gxUS99O/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-32-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0223.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_033910_TTUQ1b1x1_67635_7gxUS99O/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-32-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0223.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_033910_TTUQ1b1x1_67635_7gxUS99O/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-32-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0223.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-32-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0223.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-32-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0223.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-32-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0223.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-32-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0223.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-32-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0223.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-32-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0223.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-32-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0223.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_033910_TTUQ1b1x1_67635_7gxUS99O/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-32-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0223.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-32-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0223.fits.cat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=289, passed=3004
Got 3004 stars (including 2712 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-32-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0223.fits.cat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3004 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.8 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 954 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2973 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.8 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2972 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2972 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" 
Excluding outliers - 966 stars left (next iteration limit 1062)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-32-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0223.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-32-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0223.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_033910_TTUQ1b1x1_67635_7gxUS99O/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-32-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0223.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-32-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0223.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-32-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0223.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.hMw0Fnpe1X (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_033910_TTUQ1b1x1_67635_7gxUS99O/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_033910_TTUQ1b1x1_67635_7gxUS99O/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_033910_TTUQ1b1x1_67635_7gxUS99O/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_033910_TTUQ1b1x1_67635_7gxUS99O/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_033910_TTUQ1b1x1_67635_7gxUS99O/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_033910_TTUQ1b1x1_67635_7gxUS99O/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_033910_TTUQ1b1x1_67635_7gxUS99O/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_033910_TTUQ1b1x1_67635_7gxUS99O/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits.cat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=262, passed=2860
Got 2860 stars (including 2596 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits.cat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2860 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013082 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010466 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.8 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 951 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2824 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.8 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2823 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2823 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" 
Excluding outliers - 964 stars left (next iteration limit 1060)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_033910_TTUQ1b1x1_67635_7gxUS99O/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-32-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0223.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-32-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0223.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_033910_TTUQ1b1x1_67635_7gxUS99O/wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-32-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0223.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_033910_TTUQ1b1x1_67635_7gxUS99O/wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-07-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
No candidates found here
Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-07-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL

  ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_033910_TTUQ1b1x1_67635_7gxUS99O/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-32-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0223.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_033910_TTUQ1b1x1_67635_7gxUS99O/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits
  
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_033910_TTUQ1b1x1_67635_7gxUS99O/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-32-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0223.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_033910_TTUQ1b1x1_67635_7gxUS99O/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-32-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0223.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-32-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0223.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.0'  15.7(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:17:34.763 +53:59:49.75 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-32-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0223.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-32-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0223.fits
util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Image size: 941.8'x626.8'  15.7(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:17:45.024 +53:56:23.99 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:17:34.763 +53:59:49.75
Second-epoch image center 11:17:45.024 +53:56:23.99
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0624 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg.  Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits
Image size: 941.9'x626.8'  15.7(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:17:44.801 +53:56:23.58 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:17:34.763 +53:59:49.75
Second-epoch image center 11:17:44.801 +53:56:23.58
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0623 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center  11:17:45.024 +53:56:23.99
Second-epoch second image center 11:17:44.801 +53:56:23.58
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00056 deg.
###################################
ERROR: no shift applied between second-epoch images! The distance between image centers is 0.00056 deg. (min. required shift: 0.00164 deg.)
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits &> /tmp/tmp.oUW46EzzZ6
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits &> /tmp/tmp.CTHv4kGvKv
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_033910_TTUQ1b1x1_67635_7gxUS99O/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-32-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0223.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Oeze8MzfHD
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_033910_TTUQ1b1x1_67635_7gxUS99O/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-32-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0223.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_033910_TTUQ1b1x1_67635_7gxUS99O/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits &> /tmp/tmp.tfOFjiBTtX
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_033910_TTUQ1b1x1_67635_7gxUS99O/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits and wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat 
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits and wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat 
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits and wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat) found
'wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 35334 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 153.9051 to 183.7655 deg, Dec +47.5541 to +59.4343 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 153.9051 to 183.7655 deg, Dec 47.5541 to 59.4343 deg
Loaded 5322 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3363 out of 3683 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3683 out of 35334 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.832700
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.832700
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.20
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.63

Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed!  =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.63

Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:


Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 35334 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 153.9051 to 183.7655 deg, Dec +47.5541 to +59.4343 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 153.9051 to 183.7655 deg, Dec 47.5541 to 59.4343 deg
Loaded 5322 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3363 out of 3683 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3683 out of 35334 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits (aperture=4.8)
Read 34891 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 153.9051 to 183.7788 deg, Dec +47.5457 to +59.4324 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 153.9051 to 183.7788 deg, Dec 47.5457 to 59.4324 deg
Loaded 5333 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3334 out of 3681 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3681 out of 34891 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits (aperture=5.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 56 candidate transients before the final filtering.  (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
 1.9 pix  UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
 2.1 pix  UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
 2.1 pix  fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-32-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0223.fits
 2.5 pix  fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits
 1.9 pix  wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
 2.1 pix  wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
 15.6 mag.  UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
 15.6 mag.  UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
 14.3 mag.  fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-32-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0223.fits
 14.2 mag.  fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate:  14.2 (SNR )  13.7 (80% of stars)  with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of  following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). 
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. 
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.oUW46EzzZ6 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_033910_TTUQ1b1x1_67635_7gxUS99O/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=19, blended=1452, passed=35315
Got 35315 stars (including 33791 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 35315 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 687 to 749 (Dec 47.6 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 952 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35056 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 687 to 749 (Dec 47.6 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35057 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35057 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" 
Excluding outliers - 967 stars left (next iteration limit 1063)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits -region wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.CTHv4kGvKv (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_033910_TTUQ1b1x1_67635_7gxUS99O/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.cat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=21, blended=1579, passed=34870
Got 34870 stars (including 33236 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.cat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 34870 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 687 to 749 (Dec 47.5 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 954 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34630 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 687 to 749 (Dec 47.5 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34629 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34629 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" 
Excluding outliers - 967 stars left (next iteration limit 1063)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits -region wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Oeze8MzfHD (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_033910_TTUQ1b1x1_67635_7gxUS99O/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_033910_TTUQ1b1x1_67635_7gxUS99O/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-32-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0223.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_033910_TTUQ1b1x1_67635_7gxUS99O/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-32-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0223.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_033910_TTUQ1b1x1_67635_7gxUS99O/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-32-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0223.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_033910_TTUQ1b1x1_67635_7gxUS99O/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-32-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0223.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_033910_TTUQ1b1x1_67635_7gxUS99O/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-32-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0223.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_033910_TTUQ1b1x1_67635_7gxUS99O/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-32-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0223.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-32-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0223.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-32-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0223.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-32-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0223.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-32-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0223.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-32-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0223.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-32-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0223.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-32-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0223.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_033910_TTUQ1b1x1_67635_7gxUS99O/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-32-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0223.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-32-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0223.fits.cat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=598, passed=17761
Got 17761 stars (including 17127 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-32-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0223.fits.cat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 17761 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.6 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 957 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17632 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.6 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17634 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17633 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" 
Excluding outliers - 967 stars left (next iteration limit 1063)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-32-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0223.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-32-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0223.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_033910_TTUQ1b1x1_67635_7gxUS99O/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-32-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0223.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-32-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0223.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-32-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0223.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.tfOFjiBTtX (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_033910_TTUQ1b1x1_67635_7gxUS99O/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_033910_TTUQ1b1x1_67635_7gxUS99O/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_033910_TTUQ1b1x1_67635_7gxUS99O/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_033910_TTUQ1b1x1_67635_7gxUS99O/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_033910_TTUQ1b1x1_67635_7gxUS99O/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_033910_TTUQ1b1x1_67635_7gxUS99O/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_033910_TTUQ1b1x1_67635_7gxUS99O/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_033910_TTUQ1b1x1_67635_7gxUS99O/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits.cat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=557, passed=15875
Got 15875 stars (including 15287 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits.cat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 15875 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013082 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010466 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 965 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 952 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15745 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 965 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15746 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15746 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" 
Excluding outliers - 965 stars left (next iteration limit 1061)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_033910_TTUQ1b1x1_67635_7gxUS99O/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-32-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0223.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_033910_TTUQ1b1x1_67635_7gxUS99O/wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-32-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0223.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_033910_TTUQ1b1x1_67635_7gxUS99O/wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-07-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 11:51:44.70 +50:21:35.9:  13.63 +/- 0.04  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 11:51:44.70 +50:21:35.9:  13.55 +/- 0.04  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.59 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:51:44.70 +50:21:35.9: ref_mag=13.59 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5620 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 10:29:21.77 +53:20:17.8:  16.10 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 11:56:14.04 +58:02:31.7:  16.09 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 10:29:21.77 +53:20:17.8:  16.05 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 11:56:14.04 +58:02:31.7:  16.02 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53103.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53339.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 15s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52106_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224
The candidate 52106_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 05 03.35599    2461163.85599    13.59    11:51:44.52 +50:21:35.8   1384 4931   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_033910_TTUQ1b1x1_67635_7gxUS99O/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-32-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0223.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 05 03.35994    2461163.85994    13.53    11:51:44.89 +50:21:35.9   1383 4931   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_033910_TTUQ1b1x1_67635_7gxUS99O/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52322_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224
The candidate 52322_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 03.35994    2461163.85994    11.74    11:07:45.32 +56:29:17.8   5727 1708   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_033910_TTUQ1b1x1_67635_7gxUS99O/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52369_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224
The candidate 52369_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 03.35994    2461163.85994    12.01    11:56:56.77 +53:11:54.2   1247 3148   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_033910_TTUQ1b1x1_67635_7gxUS99O/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52380_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224
The candidate 52380_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 03.35994    2461163.85994    12.05    10:35:13.83 +57:15:18.3   8410 1173   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_033910_TTUQ1b1x1_67635_7gxUS99O/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52400_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224
The candidate 52400_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 03.35994    2461163.85994    12.11    11:53:08.76 +56:55:34.7   2026 1004   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_033910_TTUQ1b1x1_67635_7gxUS99O/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52415_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224
The candidate 52415_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 03.35994    2461163.85994    12.28    12:13:47.12 +57:43:44.7   0477 0121   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_033910_TTUQ1b1x1_67635_7gxUS99O/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52449_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224
The candidate 52449_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 03.35994    2461163.85994    12.32    11:16:45.93 +49:26:53.0   4693 5905   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_033910_TTUQ1b1x1_67635_7gxUS99O/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits

**** FOUND  11:16:45.99 +49:26:52.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52462_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224
The candidate 52462_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 03.35994    2461163.85994    12.33    10:33:43.23 +56:19:19.6   8582 1727   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_033910_TTUQ1b1x1_67635_7gxUS99O/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52500_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224
The candidate 52500_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 03.35994    2461163.85994    12.37    12:03:19.51 +51:48:58.7   0482 3839   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_033910_TTUQ1b1x1_67635_7gxUS99O/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52542_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224
The candidate 52542_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 03.35994    2461163.85994    12.63    10:51:51.03 +58:20:05.6   7031 0595   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_033910_TTUQ1b1x1_67635_7gxUS99O/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52546_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224
The candidate 52546_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 03.35994    2461163.85994    12.55    12:10:02.28 +53:32:24.1   0129 2673   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_033910_TTUQ1b1x1_67635_7gxUS99O/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52574_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224
The candidate 52574_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 03.35994    2461163.85994    12.60    11:00:22.39 +51:39:34.9   6313 4631   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_033910_TTUQ1b1x1_67635_7gxUS99O/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52588_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224
The candidate 52588_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 03.35994    2461163.85994    12.72    12:09:53.38 +54:53:58.2   0352 1876   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_033910_TTUQ1b1x1_67635_7gxUS99O/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52600_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224
The candidate 52600_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 03.35994    2461163.85994    12.89    12:03:26.23 +50:15:18.5   0250 4763   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_033910_TTUQ1b1x1_67635_7gxUS99O/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52624_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224
The candidate 52624_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 03.35994    2461163.85994    12.60    11:34:48.44 +51:22:17.2   3083 4578   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_033910_TTUQ1b1x1_67635_7gxUS99O/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52626_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224
The candidate 52626_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 03.35994    2461163.85994    12.69    11:26:46.48 +50:50:30.0   3801 4983   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_033910_TTUQ1b1x1_67635_7gxUS99O/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52654_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224
The candidate 52654_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 03.35994    2461163.85994    12.92    10:38:16.92 +52:51:36.3   8340 3851   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_033910_TTUQ1b1x1_67635_7gxUS99O/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52724_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224
The candidate 52724_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 03.35994    2461163.85994    13.00    11:21:37.34 +57:04:13.2   4607 1289   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_033910_TTUQ1b1x1_67635_7gxUS99O/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits

**** FOUND  11:21:37.21 +57:04:12.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52732_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224
The candidate 52732_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 03.35994    2461163.85994    12.96    11:35:51.94 +57:08:20.7   3452 1118   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_033910_TTUQ1b1x1_67635_7gxUS99O/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52735_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224
The candidate 52735_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 03.35994    2461163.85994    12.94    11:17:43.65 +54:38:59.5   4821 2769   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_033910_TTUQ1b1x1_67635_7gxUS99O/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52752_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224
The candidate 52752_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 03.35994    2461163.85994    13.15    11:58:31.91 +54:28:57.7   1272 2358   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_033910_TTUQ1b1x1_67635_7gxUS99O/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52771_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224
The candidate 52771_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 03.35994    2461163.85994    13.00    11:00:24.46 +51:28:25.5   6309 4743   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_033910_TTUQ1b1x1_67635_7gxUS99O/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52787_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224
The candidate 52787_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 03.35994    2461163.85994    13.23    12:05:25.91 +51:01:19.2   0171 4264   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_033910_TTUQ1b1x1_67635_7gxUS99O/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52791_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224
The candidate 52791_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 03.35994    2461163.85994    12.99    11:47:19.54 +52:30:51.1   2035 3721   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_033910_TTUQ1b1x1_67635_7gxUS99O/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52815_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224
The candidate 52815_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 03.35994    2461163.85994    13.11    11:11:15.33 +50:03:18.4   5250 5569   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_033910_TTUQ1b1x1_67635_7gxUS99O/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52840_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224
The candidate 52840_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 03.35994    2461163.85994    13.26    11:12:32.70 +56:51:17.8   5341 1470   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_033910_TTUQ1b1x1_67635_7gxUS99O/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52854_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224
The candidate 52854_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 03.35994    2461163.85994    13.36    10:33:52.40 +57:44:04.2   8498 0872   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_033910_TTUQ1b1x1_67635_7gxUS99O/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52866_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224
The candidate 52866_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 03.35994    2461163.85994    13.28    12:06:26.68 +56:31:02.2   0884 0997   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_033910_TTUQ1b1x1_67635_7gxUS99O/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52894_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224
The candidate 52894_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 03.35994    2461163.85994    13.34    12:02:07.14 +52:49:07.3   0732 3271   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_033910_TTUQ1b1x1_67635_7gxUS99O/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52899_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224
The candidate 52899_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 03.35994    2461163.85994    13.28    10:26:29.09 +54:25:18.2   9322 2813   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_033910_TTUQ1b1x1_67635_7gxUS99O/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52927_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224
The candidate 52927_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 03.35994    2461163.85994    13.49    11:23:14.78 +58:34:10.4   4556 0373   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_033910_TTUQ1b1x1_67635_7gxUS99O/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52928_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224
The candidate 52928_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 03.35994    2461163.85994    13.27    12:03:12.58 +50:44:34.4   0341 4478   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_033910_TTUQ1b1x1_67635_7gxUS99O/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52968_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224
The candidate 52968_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 03.35994    2461163.85994    13.46    11:56:45.59 +49:20:53.2   0774 5442   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_033910_TTUQ1b1x1_67635_7gxUS99O/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53014_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224
The candidate 53014_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 03.35994    2461163.85994    13.48    11:36:07.80 +49:43:18.3   2823 5552   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_033910_TTUQ1b1x1_67635_7gxUS99O/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53016_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224
The candidate 53016_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 03.35994    2461163.85994    13.71    12:07:03.06 +57:50:17.8   1029 0203   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_033910_TTUQ1b1x1_67635_7gxUS99O/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53035_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224
The candidate 53035_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 03.35994    2461163.85994    13.30    12:09:49.29 +54:25:11.3   0284 2160   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_033910_TTUQ1b1x1_67635_7gxUS99O/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53052_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224
The candidate 53052_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 03.35994    2461163.85994    13.60    11:56:03.55 +53:47:24.1   1400 2814   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_033910_TTUQ1b1x1_67635_7gxUS99O/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53103_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224
Preparing report for the candidate 53103_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53105_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224
The candidate 53105_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 03.35994    2461163.85994    13.74    12:01:39.87 +54:56:32.1   1063 2025   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_033910_TTUQ1b1x1_67635_7gxUS99O/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53108_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224
The candidate 53108_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 03.35994    2461163.85994    13.61    11:32:37.03 +49:39:24.7   3159 5634   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_033910_TTUQ1b1x1_67635_7gxUS99O/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53112_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224
The candidate 53112_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 03.35994    2461163.85994    13.67    11:33:21.53 +56:39:10.8   3619 1437   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_033910_TTUQ1b1x1_67635_7gxUS99O/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53118_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224
The candidate 53118_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 03.35994    2461163.85994    13.83    10:39:41.04 +52:42:35.8   8217 3950   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_033910_TTUQ1b1x1_67635_7gxUS99O/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53136_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224
The candidate 53136_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 03.35994    2461163.85994    13.83    11:54:44.92 +53:17:31.6   1455 3133   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_033910_TTUQ1b1x1_67635_7gxUS99O/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53166_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224
The candidate 53166_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 03.35994    2461163.85994    13.77    12:00:36.91 +54:35:05.8   1105 2257   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_033910_TTUQ1b1x1_67635_7gxUS99O/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53174_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224
The candidate 53174_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 03.35994    2461163.85994    14.13    12:07:40.34 +52:34:09.0   0193 3299   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_033910_TTUQ1b1x1_67635_7gxUS99O/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53198_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224
The candidate 53198_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 03.35994    2461163.85994    14.09    11:56:39.30 +56:47:16.5   1723 1026   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_033910_TTUQ1b1x1_67635_7gxUS99O/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53210_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224
The candidate 53210_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 03.35994    2461163.85994    13.73    10:52:52.41 +49:33:22.9   7039 5906   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_033910_TTUQ1b1x1_67635_7gxUS99O/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53254_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224
The candidate 53254_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 03.35994    2461163.85994    13.93    10:40:27.93 +52:10:23.0   8165 4279   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_033910_TTUQ1b1x1_67635_7gxUS99O/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53258_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224
The candidate 53258_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 03.35994    2461163.85994    14.20    10:47:29.39 +56:21:36.0   7420 1780   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_033910_TTUQ1b1x1_67635_7gxUS99O/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53259_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224
The candidate 53259_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 03.35994    2461163.85994    14.13    11:21:59.17 +58:57:10.3   4674 0150   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_033910_TTUQ1b1x1_67635_7gxUS99O/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53324_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224
The candidate 53324_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 03.35994    2461163.85994    14.21    12:03:34.62 +56:44:53.5   1152 0919   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_033910_TTUQ1b1x1_67635_7gxUS99O/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53339_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224
Preparing report for the candidate 53339_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53357_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224
The candidate 53357_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 03.35994    2461163.85994    14.45    11:35:33.68 +55:27:43.3   3342 2125   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_033910_TTUQ1b1x1_67635_7gxUS99O/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30616_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224
The candidate 30616_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 05 03.35994    2461163.85994    12.29    11:25:16.69 +57:03:42.9   4308 1267   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_033910_TTUQ1b1x1_67635_7gxUS99O/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33018_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224
The candidate 33018_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 05 03.35994    2461163.85994    11.75    11:25:09.59 +56:06:39.5   4262 1839   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_033910_TTUQ1b1x1_67635_7gxUS99O/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 17353_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224
The candidate 17353_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 05 03.35994    2461163.85994    12.99    12:01:46.95 +54:07:21.6   0941 2507   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_033910_TTUQ1b1x1_67635_7gxUS99O/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_03-38-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 17s
Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-07-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
10:29:21.77 +53:20:17.8
11:56:14.04 +58:02:31.7
########### Completed UMa-07-Q1b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
10:29:21.77 +53:20:17.8
11:56:14.04 +58:02:31.7
###################################################################################
10:29:21.77 +53:20:17.8  -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
11:56:14.04 +58:02:31.7  -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
10:29:21.77 +53:20:17.8  -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
11:56:14.04 +58:02:31.7  -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
10:29:21.77 +53:20:17.8  -- not a known variable star
11:56:14.04 +58:02:31.7  -- not a known variable star
Found 2 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
2 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN= NO   ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Adding the following to the exclusion list ####
10:29:21.77 +53:20:17.8
11:56:14.04 +58:02:31.7
####################################################
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461163.85599094 -observatory V36
01:54:18.02 +09:57:30.5 Mercury (-1.0mag)
04:36:06.91 +23:02:46.5 Venus (-3.9mag)
01:07:01.24 +06:10:51.4 Mars (1.2mag)
07:21:59.89 +22:29:39.5 Jupiter (-2.0mag)
00:36:39.09 +01:34:51.9 Saturn (0.9mag)
03:51:34.49 +19:59:41.2 Uranus (5.8mag)
00:12:58.54 -00:02:03.4 Neptune (7.8mag)
20:34:13.11 -22:54:29.4 Pluto (14.5mag)
15:48:49.41 -25:56:13.1 Moon (-12.3mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 363 May  3 03:40 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461163.85599094:
07:21:53.06 +22:29:55.5 Io (5.9mag)
07:21:54.63 +22:29:54.3 Europa (6.0mag)
07:21:41.68 +22:30:21.5 Ganymede (5.4mag)
07:22:33.46 +22:28:21.7 Callisto (6.7mag)
07:24:27.00 +22:10:29.5 Himalia (15.4mag)
07:22:03.47 +22:29:31.9 Thebe (16.3mag)
07:24:53.96 +22:39:28.1 Elara (17.4mag)
07:22:02.64 +23:00:34.0 Pasiphae (17.5mag)
07:29:52.99 +22:29:04.7 Carme (18.6mag)
00:36:34.69 +01:35:20.6 Titan (8.7mag)
00:36:35.62 +01:35:04.7 Rhea (10.0mag)
00:36:13.09 +01:32:51.5 Iapetus (11.5mag)
00:36:54.39 +01:34:46.3 Hyperion (14.8mag)
00:38:00.74 +01:41:39.1 Phoebe (16.8mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 569 May  3 03:40 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461163.85599094:
16:38:26.47 -26:06:14.3 JWST
18:04:48.87 +33:50:36.0 Chandra
19:27:49.18 +02:36:34.8 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 May  3 03:40 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461163.85599094 -observatory V36
-> Warning: Longitude 255.61742 is outside valid range [-180, 180]
06:43:46.95 +29:12:51.7 17.8mag P/2009 WX51 (Catalina)
18:55:53.50 -29:54:37.9 13.8mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
05:20:20.66 -68:55:44.8 17.4mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
05:36:54.53 +31:34:27.2 17.3mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
17:27:18.40 +12:29:46.4 17.7mag C/2021 G2 (ATLAS)
23:13:45.13 +29:59:02.7 17.1mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS)
04:49:56.98 +26:27:58.0 16.2mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
09:08:57.67 +31:57:30.0 16.4mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS)
08:35:07.18 +01:31:15.8 17.4mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS)
18:48:01.41 +19:53:27.7 17.6mag C/2023 A3 (Tsuchinshan-ATLAS)
15:34:09.56 -11:16:14.9 17.5mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS)
09:01:46.88 -09:19:24.5 17.8mag C/2023 F3 (ATLAS)
22:08:20.52 +64:01:48.2 17.6mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon)
18:59:13.40 -04:12:05.9 13.9mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS)
19:14:43.08 +88:08:29.8 17.9mag C/2023 X2 (Lemmon)
06:29:33.55 +63:32:48.9 17.3mag C/2024 A1 (ATLAS)
05:47:36.49 +22:51:57.2 12.1mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
16:06:43.80 +09:08:37.2 17.3mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS)
20:23:34.96 +20:12:58.9 14.4mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
03:42:32.38 -19:54:55.2 16.2mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
05:32:11.49 +41:18:41.5 17.8mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov)
12:33:58.35 +52:10:12.3 16.0mag C/2025 L1 (ATLAS)
03:54:51.86 -29:12:52.3 18.0mag C/2025 Q3 (ATLAS)
04:26:34.98 -02:30:53.4 8.8mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS)
12:47:07.29 +03:55:58.8 17.3mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
05:00:48.37 +01:38:27.0 16.8mag C/2026 A1 (MAPS)
00:45:27.46 +39:55:09.6 15.1mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao)
19:16:28.47 -08:47:17.1 10.8mag 10P/Tempel
14:37:33.58 +01:00:34.3 15.6mag 24P/Schaumasse
10:59:34.09 -01:04:24.6 15.8mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
10:40:00.68 -03:01:38.7 17.3mag 43P/Wolf-Harrington
02:15:42.36 +20:21:28.5 17.4mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson
07:44:36.04 +33:06:27.1 16.9mag 63P/Wild
23:50:14.24 -09:28:59.8 15.7mag 65P/Gunn
04:51:52.24 +26:37:26.6 16.1mag 76P/West-Kohoutek-Ikemura
01:44:38.76 +11:32:03.1 14.1mag 78P/Gehrels
23:52:54.47 -04:18:32.6 14.9mag 88P/Howell
03:01:21.32 +24:52:49.9 15.0mag 93P/Lovas
05:29:30.87 +33:02:06.3 16.0mag 123P/West-Hartley
08:51:43.89 +30:25:19.7 16.3mag 124P/Mrkos
03:00:32.82 +16:12:46.8 16.4mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt
03:21:53.71 +16:25:34.5 17.6mag 131P/Mueller
02:59:48.51 +17:56:39.9 10.8mag 141P/Machholz
03:05:34.78 +10:59:33.5 10.8mag 141P-A/Machholz
01:45:41.48 +06:49:32.6 11.0mag 141P-D/Machholz
01:51:33.23 +07:14:07.3 14.9mag 162P/SidingSpring
22:23:52.12 -07:25:56.6 18.0mag 218P/LINEAR
17:15:43.59 -11:48:08.0 16.1mag 235P/LINEAR
06:12:57.50 +35:39:05.0 17.0mag 240P/NEAT
07:48:42.32 -03:31:02.3 17.9mag 242P/Spahr
23:00:27.79 -15:53:03.0 17.4mag 260P/McNaught
02:35:21.73 +24:44:20.9 17.8mag 295P/LINEAR
15:34:26.18 +07:56:09.1 17.4mag 391P/Kowalski
07:42:27.40 +21:19:57.1 17.7mag 450P/LONEOS
06:02:12.68 +44:00:48.8 17.6mag 493P/LONEOS
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.8K May  3 03:40 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
21:00:10.71 -32:17:03.90  AT2026kis  2026-04-27.36 16.15
14:32:57.37 -58:13:26.40  ASASSN-26dc  2026-04-27.27 13.42
15:32:05.35 -43:54:34.60  ASASSN-26db  2026-04-27.37 16.06
16:34:34.94 -54:34:58.20  ASASSN-26da  2026-04-25.14 15.99
10:06:55.04 -01:13:49.70  SN2026jsg  2026-04-24.99 16.28
15:15:57.17 +56:18:32.80  SN2026kid  2026-04-24.52 -3.65
07:58:28.45 +57:03:42.40  AT2026kcf  2026-04-24.2 16.89
11:38:21.80 -50:43:06.50  SN2026jkb  2026-04-24.24 15.38
10:06:11.41 -39:41:04.20  AT2026dil  2026-04-24.2 16.85
14:21:40.08 +13:13:46.30  SN2026jlm  2026-04-22.16 15.12
10:53:55.47 -16:06:07.00  ASASSN-26cz  2026-04-22.24 16.32
21:00:10.71 -32:17:03.90    2026-04-27.36 16.15
13:45:02.03 +15:17:14.50  ASASSN-26cy  2026-04-21.27 15.78
13:20:52.22 -35:57:03.60  AT2026jcm  2026-04-19.01 16.65
13:36:15.66 -36:53:48.40  SN 2026iqy  2026-04-18.92 17.31
06:34:01.33 -40:07:34.00  ASASSN-26cx  2026-04-19.07 16.16
23:33:57.97 -45:12:11.90  SN 2026idu  2026-04-19.41 15.9
12:10:50.92 +66:55:31.20  SN 2026icv  2026-04-17.14 16.03
21:36:59.06 -60:43:35.90  ASASSN-26cv  2026-04-17.35 -1.18
08:13:26.26 -27:07:30.50  ASASSN-26cw  2026-04-17.07 -1.01
14:49:14.13 -27:29:20.60  ASASSN-26cu  2026-04-16.06 14.03
17:21:59.44 -38:54:04.60  ASASSN-26ct  2026-04-14.4 15.15
15:25:54.99 +07:49:24.50  SN2026huo  2026-04-12.14 16.96
21:00:10.71 -32:17:03.90    2026-04-27.36 16.15
12:23:20.40 +04:53:39.10  AT2026ixd  2026-04-12.14 17.65
17:46:09.76 -61:19:50.40  SN2026icy  2026-04-12.2 17.03
09:25:46.42 +02:13:46.30  SN2026gud  2026-04-11.98 16.49
16:52:15.46 -60:27:45.90  ASASSN-26cs  2026-04-12.4 15.5
04:20:55.37 -51:15:31.10  ASASSN-26cr  2026-04-12.01 15.37
22:25:39.35 +36:45:06.90  AT2026ihl  2026-04-10.48 14.21
19:40:44.94 +00:41:03.80  AT2026imw  2026-04-10.32 16.06
19:52:04.70 +05:53:33.50  ASASSN-26cq  2026-04-9.31 14.98
16:08:18.39 -64:11:08.80  ASASSN-26cp  2026-04-9.14 13.64
09:22:22.90 -61:02:43.70  SN2026idh  2026-04-7.97 16.34
05:06:54.12 -19:42:26.40  AT2026imr  2026-04-8 17.49
07:14:55.34 -36:03:21.40  AT2026hei  2026-04-8.12 16.7
21:35:33.14 -19:01:34.80  AT2026ihm  2026-04-8.36 16.7
04:28:24.08 -32:25:35.30  AT2026imo  2026-04-8.02 16.81
05:10:35.79 -39:38:40.80  SN 2026hnn  2026-04-7.04 17.07
09:54:32.04 -01:17:25.80  ASASSN-26cn  2026-04-7.01 15.58
07:46:24.43 -77:29:35.90  ASASSN-26co  2026-04-7.15 14.93
05:00:45.52 -29:51:06.20  AT2026hvw  2026-04-6.03 16.51
19:49:33.10 -23:37:11.00  ASASSN-26cl  2026-04-5.29 14.98
19:32:43.55 -22:39:33.40  ASASSN-26cm  2026-04-4.3 13.88
18:08:57.38 +76:48:23.60  ASASSN-26ck  2026-04-2.37 15.38
16:16:36.10 +44:52:30.20  AT2026hyy  2026-04-2.58 13.81
21:55:23.31 -34:48:53.90  ASASSN-26cj  2026-03-30.4 -1.47
11:19:50.81 -27:51:50.40  SN2026gvk  2026-03-30 15.28
11:53:57.02 -23:09:46.20  SN2026gzx  2026-03-28.75 15.27
07:13:46.14 -33:10:15.70  ASASSN-26ci  2026-03-28.15 15.14
09:03:36.09 -67:58:13.00  SN2026hkg  2026-03-28.19 15.82
07:03:00.72 +39:14:43.00  SN2026fin  2026-03-28.27 15.82
05:35:42.80 -63:44:05.50  ASASSN-26ch  2026-03-27.86 13.02
11:23:19.04 +34:22:38.00  SN2026fwt  2026-03-27.3 16.56
19:03:49.79 +37:04:05.20  ASASSN-26ce  2026-03-26.56 16.3
20:26:56.07 -52:54:06.50  AT2026hiy  2026-03-26.35 16.95
05:25:54.76 -30:15:35.80  ASASSN-26cg  2026-03-25.07 16.88
06:57:16.49 -26:54:37.20  SN2026fzb  2026-03-25.14 15.8
14:37:38.23 -43:00:52.30  ASASSN-26cd  2026-03-24.24 12.52
17:34:53.03 +06:04:29.70  AT2026gzl  2026-03-23.27 15.82
08:30:02.60 -35:12:47.50  ASASSN-26cf  2026-03-23.2 14.82
16:54:25.33 +37:49:56.60  SN 2026evz  2026-03-21.32 17.54
17:06:19.20 -18:54:19.50  ASASSN-26bx  2026-03-21.25 16.39
19:01:16.28 -29:29:23.10  ASASSN-26bw  2026-03-21.33 15.81
08:46:05.75 +10:47:39.80  ASASSN-26ca  2026-03-21.13 14.27
12:14:58.16 +63:47:16.20  SN 2026fvx  2026-03-21.12 15.6
18:02:55.90 -75:23:02.60  ASASSN-26bz  2026-03-21.32 16.16
12:16:02.87 -53:16:33.70  ASASSN-26cc  2026-03-20.08 3.93
13:08:21.85 +29:13:44.20  SN 2026fmh  2026-03-20.16 -0.33
19:56:38.48 -34:45:21.50  ASASSN-26cb  2026-03-20.35 -3.26
14:32:41.15 -41:38:48.50  ASASSN-26by  2026-03-20.15 -1.31
13:00:42.99 +37:18:34.60  SN2026fjc  2026-03-19.5 15.97
06:02:44.21 -04:11:06.20  ASASSN-26bv  2026-03-19.19 15.67
12:20:27.96 -45:55:38.40  ASASSN-26bt  2026-03-18.8 16.32
07:49:57.30 -56:14:35.10  ASASSN-26bu  2026-03-19.19 15.74
06:04:29.75 +53:23:34.00  SN 2026eza  2026-03-18.2 17.48
11:54:57.87 +69:19:28.90  AT2026fsf  2026-03-18.14 16.95
10:44:46.95 +58:27:29.30  SN 2026enn  2026-03-18.13 17.53
20:45:54.04 -73:26:43.00  AT 2026ezy  2026-03-18.13 16.83
06:53:18.10 -59:10:49.30  ASASSN-26bs  2026-03-18.02 16.93
07:45:09.29 -62:14:36.20  ASASSN-26br  2026-03-16.16 16.78
19:24:27.93 -52:04:36.40  AT 2023uk  2026-03-16.35 14.2
04:52:54.50 -15:20:57.10  AT2026fhw  2026-03-14.06 SDSS
11:10:34.24 +02:58:48.10  SN2026drr  2026-03-14.08 0.2
07:26:45.73 -27:45:13.90  ASASSN-26bo  2026-03-14.17 13.8
16:35:46.94 +58:12:28.40  SN2026ebt  2026-03-12.41 17.12
13:01:19.45 +15:42:15.00  SN2026ehe  2026-03-12.11 -0.29
09:15:55.41 +10:08:09.70  SN2026efq  2026-03-12.16 0.06
03:31:20.92 -35:29:29.00  SN2026evh  2026-03-12.05 17.29
06:26:19.15 -85:18:28.10  AT2026ffp  2026-03-12.16 0.37
14:16:42.30 -41:18:36.50  AT2026fij  2026-03-12.05 15.97
10:45:04.71 +00:06:13.10  SN 2026exe  2026-03-11.78 16.48
18:07:45.58 +69:43:01.00  SN2026ess  2026-03-12.37 17.37
13:11:03.58 +49:06:31.80  AT2026ewa  2026-03-12.42 16.77
15:03:25.23 -63:11:22.20  ASASSN-26bp  2026-03-11.92 13.33
13:09:37.25 -35:50:25.20  AT2024cmo  2026-03-11.12 16.29
13:06:01.97 -15:50:14.40  AT2026fdy  2026-03-10.33 16.68
11:30:09.70 -47:26:45.00  ASASSN-26bn  2026-03-10.3 15.14
05:03:25.25 -24:16:50.40  (= Gaia  2026-03-9.09 14.32
03:42:32.53 -04:17:53.70  ASASSN-26bm  2026-03-8.04 15.22
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.8K May  3 03:40 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
08:01:11.02 -03:43:14.1  TCP J08011102-0343141  2026-02-08.8090  15.10Cmag
05:19:15.40 -02:04:51.5  TCP J05191540-0204515  2026-02-13.4306  14.5mag
10:52:41.26 +36:40:08.9  TCP J10524126+3640089  2026-02-17.6065  17.4mag
05:50:50.81 +36:22:45.1  TCP J05505081+3622451  2026-02-17.5511  15.7mag
00:42:51.33 +41:13:49.1  PNV J00425133+4113491  2026-02-20.738  18.3mag
00:43:04.88 +41:29:41.4  PNV J00430488+4129414  2026-02-20.5923  18.84Cmag
17:43:29.74 +11:24:00.3  TCP J17432974+1124003  2026-02-22.3773  13.6mag
09:55:01.59 +69:08:42.7  PNV J09550159+6908427  2026-02-20.893  19.0mag
07:03:25.76 -12:41:40.1  TCP J07032576-1241401  2026-03-10.4268  15.4mag
00:42:36.82 +41:16:05.8  PNV J00423682+4116058  2026-03-12.5744  17.24Cmag
07:26:45.79 -27:45:14.1  TCP J07264579-2745141  2026-03-17.4417  14.8mag
17:57:19.56 -28:08:14.7  TCP J17571956-2808147  2026-03-19.7972  14.5mag
08:46:05.73 +10:47:39.7  TCP J08460573+1047397  2026-03-21.1936  14.5mag
09:55:38.83 +69:05:21.7  PNV J09553883+6905217  2026-04-01.893  19.4mag
19:32:43.67 -22:39:30.7  TCP J19324367-2239307  2026-04-05.4395  13.6mag
16:16:36.03 +44:52:28.9  TCP J16163603+4452289  2026-04-05.6655  14.2mag
00:43:38.36 +41:15:32.4  PNV J00433836+4115324  2026-04-08.079  17.2mag
15:41:11.68 +59:18:26.8  TCP J15411168+5918268  2026-04-12.9625  19.2mag
00:43:35.02 +41:46:28.0  PNV J00433502+4146280  2026-04-23.056  15.9mag
00:42:55.64 +41:14:12.2  PNV J00425564+4114122  2026-04-24.042  16.2mag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 188K May  3 03:40 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
10:10:53.458 +45:56:52.48  SN 2026knu  2026-04-20.18 19.5784
13:23:31.702 -27:27:16.87  AT 2026knt  2026-04-21.45 19.6
14:59:13.174 -10:47:02.79  AT 2026kns  2026-04-09.59 20.1
14:45:20.668 -24:47:31.93  AT 2026knr  2026-03-24.65 20.36
11:45:24.981 +14:40:44.45  AT 2026knq  2026-04-13.92 20.18
04:52:30.865 -15:17:09.10  AT 2026knp  2026-04-20.71 18.098
17:25:02.776 +69:43:35.23  AT 2026kno  2026-04-23.10 19.208
15:15:42.943 -39:27:45.41  AT 2026knn  2026-04-14.63 19.62
21:02:34.025 +19:12:44.83  AT 2026knm  2026-04-22.60 18.74
14:38:36.298 -39:37:27.88  AT 2026knl  2026-04-21.52 20.1
13:24:43.943 +16:55:43.96  AT 2026knk  2026-04-20.96 20.03
13:55:11.417 +21:19:35.16  AT 2026knj  2026-04-20.98 19.3
16:21:58.180 +07:39:22.34  AT 2026kni  2026-04-22.11 19.97
18:25:00.619 +56:31:13.17  AT 2026knh  2026-04-14.18 19.89
11:52:14.846 +19:25:04.67  AT 2026kng  2026-04-12.92 20.24
17:52:14.690 -78:03:43.36  AT 2026kne  2026-04-23.29 18.712
19:46:54.481 -51:39:39.32  AT 2026knd  2026-04-20.32 17.94
21:24:26.061 +26:56:11.62  AT 2026knc  2026-04-23.59 17.66
11:18:30.556 -08:06:31.77  AT 2026knb  2026-04-22.86 19.129
14:56:59.281 +45:09:43.33  AT 2026kna  2026-04-23.01 19.329
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 30K May  3 03:40 tns_transients_list.txt

=== Transient Factory Profiling ===
Started: Sun May  3 03:39:55 CDT 2026
=======================================
TIMING SExtractor: 1 seconds
TIMING matching_and_photometry: 1 seconds
TIMING lightcurve_write: 0 seconds
TIMING select_aperture: 0 seconds
    VAST_RUN_default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1: 4s (0.07 min)
    WCS_CACHE_SETUP: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_CALIBRATION_AND_EPHEMERIS: 21s (0.35 min)
    PLATE_VERIFY_AND_POINTING: 0s (0.00 min)
    UCAC5_PLATE_SOLVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    MAGNITUDE_CALIBRATION: 32s (0.53 min)
    MAGCAL_SANITY_CHECK: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_MAGNITUDE_CONSOLIDATED: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_FRAME_EDGE: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_SECOND_EPOCH_VERIFY: 0s (0.00 min)
    CANDIDATE_FILTERING_TOTAL: 0s (0.00 min)
    EXCLUSION_LIST_PREPARATION: 0s (0.00 min)
    SEEING_AND_LIMITING_MAG: 0s (0.00 min)
    WAIT_FOR_UCAC5: 1s (0.02 min)
    WCS_IMAGE_ARCHIVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    HTML_REPORT: 0s (0.00 min)
  SE_CONFIG_default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1: 58s (0.97 min)
TIMING SExtractor: 8 seconds
TIMING matching_and_photometry: 1 seconds
TIMING lightcurve_write: 0 seconds
TIMING select_aperture: 2 seconds
    VAST_RUN_default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL: 16s (0.27 min)
    WCS_CACHE_SETUP: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_CALIBRATION_AND_EPHEMERIS: 0s (0.00 min)
    PLATE_VERIFY_AND_POINTING: 0s (0.00 min)
    UCAC5_PLATE_SOLVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    MAGNITUDE_CALIBRATION: 44s (0.73 min)
    MAGCAL_SANITY_CHECK: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_MAGNITUDE_CONSOLIDATED: 1s (0.02 min)
      FILTER_FRAME_EDGE: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_SECOND_EPOCH_VERIFY: 0s (0.00 min)
    CANDIDATE_FILTERING_TOTAL: 1s (0.02 min)
    EXCLUSION_LIST_PREPARATION: 0s (0.00 min)
    SEEING_AND_LIMITING_MAG: 1s (0.02 min)
    WAIT_FOR_UCAC5: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_IMAGE_ARCHIVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    HTML_REPORT: 17s (0.28 min)
  SE_CONFIG_default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL: 79s (1.32 min)
FIELD_UMa-07-Q1b1x1: 148s (2.47 min)
=======================================
TOTAL_RUNTIME: 151s (2.52 min)
Finished: Sun May  3 03:42:26 CDT 2026