NMW transient search results

This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_005255_TTUQ1b1x1_399162_K0nAOO6R

The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.

Processing fields UMa-09-Q1b1x1

Processing complete!

Total number of candidates identified: 0

Processing log:

Filtering log:

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.0
FLAT_FIELD_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-04-22_multinight.fit
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 8000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 4000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 3.5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
UMa-09-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting UMa-09-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing UMa-09-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 1003389 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 1003389 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-51-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-51-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits_preview.png'
UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-51-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits

renamed 'UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits_preview.png'
UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits


Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold. ---------------------------------------------- INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 449.0147 INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 524.3424 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 2542.5872 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 669.6445 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 2550.3586 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 670.8739 ---------------------------------------------- INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 5.66259 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.002 ---------------------------------------------- Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-04-22_multinight.fit EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= -5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -4.9 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 13.289999961853 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 11.8 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_005255_TTUQ1b1x1_399162_K0nAOO6R/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-51-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits CCD-TEMP= -4.900000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_005255_TTUQ1b1x1_399162_K0nAOO6R/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-51-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits SET-TEMP= -5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_005255_TTUQ1b1x1_399162_K0nAOO6R/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-51-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-05-03T00:51:02.3135511' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-05-03T05:51:02.3135511' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61163.2437767708 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-05-03T05:51:12.2146193' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61163.2438913658 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= -5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -4.9 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 143.998089288978 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 45.9998670063738 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 41.6925 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 304.136944444444 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.50162736605446 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'UMa-09' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '09 36 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+46 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29451 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29451 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 13.289999961853 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 13.289999961853 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 3.0 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 55.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 904.81 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 11.8 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 76.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 11.200896 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 9.400752 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_005255_TTUQ1b1x1_399162_K0nAOO6R/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-51-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= -5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_005255_TTUQ1b1x1_399162_K0nAOO6R/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-51-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits SET-TEMP= -5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-22.fit CCD-TEMP= -4.900000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_005255_TTUQ1b1x1_399162_K0nAOO6R/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-51-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits CCD-TEMP= -5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-22.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-22.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_005255_TTUQ1b1x1_399162_K0nAOO6R/d_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-51-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits :) Spent 0.574249 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-22.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_005255_TTUQ1b1x1_399162_K0nAOO6R/d_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-51-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-04-22_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 37850.569222 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_005255_TTUQ1b1x1_399162_K0nAOO6R/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-51-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24504.0, right_median=28262.5) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-04-22_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_005255_TTUQ1b1x1_399162_K0nAOO6R/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-51-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= -5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -4.9 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 13.289999961853 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 11.8 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_005255_TTUQ1b1x1_399162_K0nAOO6R/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits CCD-TEMP= -4.900000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_005255_TTUQ1b1x1_399162_K0nAOO6R/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits SET-TEMP= -5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_005255_TTUQ1b1x1_399162_K0nAOO6R/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-05-03T00:52:01.1183299' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-05-03T05:52:01.1183299' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61163.2444573841 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-05-03T05:52:11.0201744' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61163.2445719908 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= -5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -4.9 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 143.998089344905 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 45.9998670012685 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 41.5263888888889 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 304.170833333333 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.50651674617818 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'UMa-09' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '09 36 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+46 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29451 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29451 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 13.289999961853 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 13.289999961853 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 3.0 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 55.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 904.81 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 11.8 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 76.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 11.200896 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 9.400752 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_005255_TTUQ1b1x1_399162_K0nAOO6R/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= -5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_005255_TTUQ1b1x1_399162_K0nAOO6R/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits SET-TEMP= -5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-22.fit CCD-TEMP= -4.900000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_005255_TTUQ1b1x1_399162_K0nAOO6R/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits CCD-TEMP= -5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-22.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-22.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_005255_TTUQ1b1x1_399162_K0nAOO6R/d_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits :) Spent 0.546828 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-22.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_005255_TTUQ1b1x1_399162_K0nAOO6R/d_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-04-22_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 37850.569222 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_005255_TTUQ1b1x1_399162_K0nAOO6R/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24504.0, right_median=28262.5) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-04-22_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_005255_TTUQ1b1x1_399162_K0nAOO6R/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_005255_TTUQ1b1x1_399162_K0nAOO6R/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-51-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_005255_TTUQ1b1x1_399162_K0nAOO6R/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:

fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-51-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits


fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits


Updating neverexclude_list.txt '/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt' Choosing bad regions list '/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst' wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_005255_TTUQ1b1x1_399162_K0nAOO6R/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-51-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_005255_TTUQ1b1x1_399162_K0nAOO6R/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_005255_TTUQ1b1x1_399162_K0nAOO6R/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-51-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_005255_TTUQ1b1x1_399162_K0nAOO6R/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461163.74389251 Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt '../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt '../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt '../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt' Plate-solving the images wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits' wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits' wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-51-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-51-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-51-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-51-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits' wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits' ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits Image size: 941.7'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 09:36:00.662 +46:00:08.08 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-51-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-51-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits Image size: 941.6'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 09:36:18.795 +45:58:44.92 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 09:36:00.662 +46:00:08.08 Second-epoch image center 09:36:18.795 +45:58:44.92 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0574 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits Image size: 941.6'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 09:36:17.073 +45:58:39.80 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 09:36:00.662 +46:00:08.08 Second-epoch image center 09:36:17.073 +45:58:39.80 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0535 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 09:36:18.795 +45:58:44.92 Second-epoch second image center 09:36:17.073 +45:58:39.80 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00519 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for ar aprallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits &> /tmp/tmp.V6O30d9UXM Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits &> /tmp/tmp.O9K7CJ6GEY Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_005255_TTUQ1b1x1_399162_K0nAOO6R/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-51-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits &> /tmp/tmp.0FVKljcgSv Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_005255_TTUQ1b1x1_399162_K0nAOO6R/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-51-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_005255_TTUQ1b1x1_399162_K0nAOO6R/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits &> /tmp/tmp.eOoYR3nWNe Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_005255_TTUQ1b1x1_399162_K0nAOO6R/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits and wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits and wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat Found non-empty wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits and wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat The reference image (wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat) found 'wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 8167 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 131.3127 to 155.8106 deg, Dec +39.8609 to +51.4112 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 131.3127 to 155.8106 deg, Dec 39.8609 to 51.4112 deg Loaded 5369 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3785 out of 3992 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3992 out of 8167 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.906500 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.906500 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.43 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.48 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.48
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 8167 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 131.3127 to 155.8106 deg, Dec +39.8609 to +51.4112 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 131.3127 to 155.8106 deg, Dec 39.8609 to 51.4112 deg Loaded 5369 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3785 out of 3992 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3992 out of 8167 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits (aperture=6.2) Read 8217 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 131.3128 to 155.8106 deg, Dec +39.8864 to +51.4195 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 131.3128 to 155.8106 deg, Dec 39.8864 to 51.4195 deg Loaded 5366 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3787 out of 3997 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3997 out of 8217 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits (aperture=6.2) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 1 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.1 pix UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits 2.1 pix UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits 2.3 pix fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-51-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits 2.3 pix fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits 2.1 pix wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits 2.1 pix wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.5 mag. UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits 15.5 mag. UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits 14.3 mag. fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-51-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits 14.3 mag. fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.3 (SNR ) 11.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.V6O30d9UXM (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_005255_TTUQ1b1x1_399162_K0nAOO6R/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=568, passed=8167 Got 8167 stars (including 7592 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8167 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 709 (Dec 39.9 to 51.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 959 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8061 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 709 (Dec 39.9 to 51.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8061 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8061 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Excluding outliers - 975 stars left (next iteration limit 1072) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits -region wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.O9K7CJ6GEY (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_005255_TTUQ1b1x1_399162_K0nAOO6R/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=561, passed=8217 Got 8217 stars (including 7647 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8217 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 709 (Dec 39.9 to 51.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 968 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8160 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 709 (Dec 39.9 to 51.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8159 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8159 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Excluding outliers - 975 stars left (next iteration limit 1072) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits -region wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.0FVKljcgSv (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_005255_TTUQ1b1x1_399162_K0nAOO6R/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_005255_TTUQ1b1x1_399162_K0nAOO6R/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-51-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_005255_TTUQ1b1x1_399162_K0nAOO6R/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-51-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_005255_TTUQ1b1x1_399162_K0nAOO6R/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-51-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_005255_TTUQ1b1x1_399162_K0nAOO6R/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-51-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_005255_TTUQ1b1x1_399162_K0nAOO6R/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-51-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_005255_TTUQ1b1x1_399162_K0nAOO6R/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-51-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-51-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-51-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-51-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-51-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-51-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-51-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-51-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_005255_TTUQ1b1x1_399162_K0nAOO6R/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-51-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-51-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=353, passed=3902 Got 3902 stars (including 3547 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-51-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3902 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 40.0 to 51.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 971 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3857 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 40.0 to 51.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3857 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3857 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Excluding outliers - 978 stars left (next iteration limit 1075) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-51-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-51-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_005255_TTUQ1b1x1_399162_K0nAOO6R/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-51-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-51-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-51-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.eOoYR3nWNe (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_005255_TTUQ1b1x1_399162_K0nAOO6R/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_005255_TTUQ1b1x1_399162_K0nAOO6R/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_005255_TTUQ1b1x1_399162_K0nAOO6R/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_005255_TTUQ1b1x1_399162_K0nAOO6R/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_005255_TTUQ1b1x1_399162_K0nAOO6R/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_005255_TTUQ1b1x1_399162_K0nAOO6R/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_005255_TTUQ1b1x1_399162_K0nAOO6R/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_005255_TTUQ1b1x1_399162_K0nAOO6R/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=362, passed=3902 Got 3902 stars (including 3537 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3902 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 39.8 to 51.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 970 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3860 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 39.8 to 51.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3860 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3860 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" Excluding outliers - 976 stars left (next iteration limit 1073) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_005255_TTUQ1b1x1_399162_K0nAOO6R/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-51-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-51-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_005255_TTUQ1b1x1_399162_K0nAOO6R/wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-51-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_005255_TTUQ1b1x1_399162_K0nAOO6R/wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits' Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-09-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20568_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134 The candidate 20568_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 03.24457    2461163.74457    11.03    09:08:47.95 +42:09:21.6   7711 5584   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_005255_TTUQ1b1x1_399162_K0nAOO6R/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits **** FOUND 09:08:47.96 +42:09:21.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-09-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_005255_TTUQ1b1x1_399162_K0nAOO6R/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-51-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_005255_TTUQ1b1x1_399162_K0nAOO6R/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_005255_TTUQ1b1x1_399162_K0nAOO6R/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-51-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_005255_TTUQ1b1x1_399162_K0nAOO6R/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-51-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images Plate-solving the images wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-51-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits Image size: 941.7'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 09:36:00.662 +46:00:08.08 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-51-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-51-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits Image size: 941.6'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 09:36:18.795 +45:58:44.92 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 09:36:00.662 +46:00:08.08 Second-epoch image center 09:36:18.795 +45:58:44.92 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0574 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits Image size: 941.6'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 09:36:17.073 +45:58:39.80 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 09:36:00.662 +46:00:08.08 Second-epoch image center 09:36:17.073 +45:58:39.80 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0535 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 09:36:18.795 +45:58:44.92 Second-epoch second image center 09:36:17.073 +45:58:39.80 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00519 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for ar aprallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits &> /tmp/tmp.LNxeWjlEsr Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits &> /tmp/tmp.n2Hlnyey5s Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_005255_TTUQ1b1x1_399162_K0nAOO6R/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-51-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits &> /tmp/tmp.4z3MqWmaVK Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_005255_TTUQ1b1x1_399162_K0nAOO6R/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-51-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_005255_TTUQ1b1x1_399162_K0nAOO6R/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits &> /tmp/tmp.NGA4yvZdkB Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_005255_TTUQ1b1x1_399162_K0nAOO6R/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits and wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits and wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat Found non-empty wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits and wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat The reference image (wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat) found 'wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 43830 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 131.1885 to 155.9231 deg, Dec +39.8074 to +51.4128 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 131.1885 to 155.9231 deg, Dec 39.8074 to 51.4128 deg Loaded 5468 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3562 out of 4004 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 4004 out of 43830 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.804800 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.804800 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.18 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.62 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.62
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 43830 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 131.1885 to 155.9231 deg, Dec +39.8074 to +51.4128 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 131.1885 to 155.9231 deg, Dec 39.8074 to 51.4128 deg Loaded 5468 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3562 out of 4004 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 4004 out of 43830 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits (aperture=4.9) Read 43644 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 131.2455 to 155.9231 deg, Dec +39.8196 to +51.4197 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 131.2455 to 155.9231 deg, Dec 39.8196 to 51.4197 deg Loaded 5437 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3556 out of 4005 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 4005 out of 43644 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits (aperture=4.9) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 65 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 1.9 pix UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits 2.0 pix UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits 2.1 pix fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-51-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits 2.1 pix fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits 1.9 pix wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits 2.0 pix wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.6 mag. UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits 15.6 mag. UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits 14.5 mag. fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-51-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits 14.5 mag. fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.5 (SNR ) 14.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.LNxeWjlEsr (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_005255_TTUQ1b1x1_399162_K0nAOO6R/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=22, blended=2151, passed=43808 Got 43808 stars (including 41580 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 43808 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 709 (Dec 39.8 to 51.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 967 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43431 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 709 (Dec 39.8 to 51.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43432 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43432 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Excluding outliers - 975 stars left (next iteration limit 1072) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits -region wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.n2Hlnyey5s (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_005255_TTUQ1b1x1_399162_K0nAOO6R/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=14, blended=2132, passed=43630 Got 43630 stars (including 41415 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 43630 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 709 (Dec 39.8 to 51.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 966 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43293 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 709 (Dec 39.8 to 51.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43291 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43291 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Excluding outliers - 975 stars left (next iteration limit 1072) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits -region wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.4z3MqWmaVK (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_005255_TTUQ1b1x1_399162_K0nAOO6R/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_005255_TTUQ1b1x1_399162_K0nAOO6R/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-51-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_005255_TTUQ1b1x1_399162_K0nAOO6R/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-51-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_005255_TTUQ1b1x1_399162_K0nAOO6R/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-51-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_005255_TTUQ1b1x1_399162_K0nAOO6R/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-51-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_005255_TTUQ1b1x1_399162_K0nAOO6R/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-51-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_005255_TTUQ1b1x1_399162_K0nAOO6R/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-51-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-51-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-51-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-51-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-51-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-51-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-51-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-51-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_005255_TTUQ1b1x1_399162_K0nAOO6R/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-51-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-51-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=17, blended=882, passed=24040 Got 24040 stars (including 23115 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-51-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 24040 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 648 to 708 (Dec 39.8 to 51.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 971 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23821 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 648 to 708 (Dec 39.8 to 51.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23821 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23821 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Excluding outliers - 978 stars left (next iteration limit 1075) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-51-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-51-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_005255_TTUQ1b1x1_399162_K0nAOO6R/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-51-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-51-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-51-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.NGA4yvZdkB (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_005255_TTUQ1b1x1_399162_K0nAOO6R/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_005255_TTUQ1b1x1_399162_K0nAOO6R/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_005255_TTUQ1b1x1_399162_K0nAOO6R/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_005255_TTUQ1b1x1_399162_K0nAOO6R/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_005255_TTUQ1b1x1_399162_K0nAOO6R/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_005255_TTUQ1b1x1_399162_K0nAOO6R/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_005255_TTUQ1b1x1_399162_K0nAOO6R/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_005255_TTUQ1b1x1_399162_K0nAOO6R/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=962, passed=24030 Got 24030 stars (including 23021 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 24030 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 648 to 708 (Dec 39.8 to 51.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 973 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23825 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 648 to 708 (Dec 39.8 to 51.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23824 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23824 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Excluding outliers - 978 stars left (next iteration limit 1075) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_005255_TTUQ1b1x1_399162_K0nAOO6R/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-51-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_005255_TTUQ1b1x1_399162_K0nAOO6R/wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-51-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_005255_TTUQ1b1x1_399162_K0nAOO6R/wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-09-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 09:11:29.94 +43:02:53.0: 13.00 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits at 09:11:29.94 +43:02:53.0: 12.93 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.96 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:11:29.94 +43:02:53.0: ref_mag=12.96 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.3299 delta=-0.37 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 10:00:07.09 +42:15:41.0: 13.06 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 09:35:49.39 +50:56:21.2: 12.79 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits at 10:00:07.09 +42:15:41.0: 13.00 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits at 09:35:49.39 +50:56:21.2: 12.77 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.03 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:00:07.09 +42:15:41.0: ref_mag=13.03 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.4173 delta=-0.39 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.78 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:35:49.39 +50:56:21.2: ref_mag=12.78 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.2180 delta=-0.44 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 09:01:59.00 +47:30:10.3: 13.76 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits at 09:01:59.00 +47:30:10.3: 13.61 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.67 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:01:59.00 +47:30:10.3: ref_mag=13.67 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7608 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90) make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52867_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134 The candidate 52867_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 03.24389    2461163.74389    13.48    09:11:29.82 +43:02:51.6   7404 5046   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_005255_TTUQ1b1x1_399162_K0nAOO6R/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-51-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 03.24457    2461163.74457    13.25    09:11:30.06 +43:02:54.4   7400 5044   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_005255_TTUQ1b1x1_399162_K0nAOO6R/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53129_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134 The candidate 53129_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 03.24457    2461163.74457    11.81    09:27:55.66 +48:31:46.8   5727 1708   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_005255_TTUQ1b1x1_399162_K0nAOO6R/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53228_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134 The candidate 53228_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 03.24457    2461163.74457    12.19    09:00:59.00 +49:23:42.7   8410 1173   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_005255_TTUQ1b1x1_399162_K0nAOO6R/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53256_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134 The candidate 53256_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 03.24457    2461163.74457    12.37    08:59:30.69 +48:28:15.4   8582 1727   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_005255_TTUQ1b1x1_399162_K0nAOO6R/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53267_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134 The candidate 53267_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 03.24457    2461163.74457    12.41    09:42:29.99 +49:06:17.6   4308 1267   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_005255_TTUQ1b1x1_399162_K0nAOO6R/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53272_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134 The candidate 53272_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 03.24457    2461163.74457    12.41    09:30:45.83 +50:55:20.7   5520 0248   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_005255_TTUQ1b1x1_399162_K0nAOO6R/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53276_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134 The candidate 53276_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 03.24457    2461163.74457    12.28    09:29:57.15 +42:20:40.1   5342 5422   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_005255_TTUQ1b1x1_399162_K0nAOO6R/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53295_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134 The candidate 53295_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 03.24457    2461163.74457    12.41    10:22:35.74 +49:58:35.3   0477 0121   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_005255_TTUQ1b1x1_399162_K0nAOO6R/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53321_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134 The candidate 53321_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 03.24457    2461163.74457    12.31    10:09:38.62 +45:20:42.7   1247 3148   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_005255_TTUQ1b1x1_399162_K0nAOO6R/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53352_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134 The candidate 53352_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 03.24457    2461163.74457    12.56    10:15:23.40 +44:00:02.4   0482 3839   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_005255_TTUQ1b1x1_399162_K0nAOO6R/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53354_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134 The candidate 53354_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 03.24457    2461163.74457    12.61    09:50:58.09 +43:25:58.8   3083 4578   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_005255_TTUQ1b1x1_399162_K0nAOO6R/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53371_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134 The candidate 53371_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 03.24457    2461163.74457    12.79    10:05:40.64 +49:03:05.2   2026 1004   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_005255_TTUQ1b1x1_399162_K0nAOO6R/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53384_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134 The candidate 53384_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 03.24457    2461163.74457    12.74    09:03:18.71 +48:54:50.3   8188 1476   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_005255_TTUQ1b1x1_399162_K0nAOO6R/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53410_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134 The candidate 53410_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 03.24457    2461163.74457    12.76    09:14:55.26 +50:24:26.9   7031 0595   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_005255_TTUQ1b1x1_399162_K0nAOO6R/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53411_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134 The candidate 53411_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 03.24457    2461163.74457    12.81    09:34:17.04 +49:03:26.0   5114 1357   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_005255_TTUQ1b1x1_399162_K0nAOO6R/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits **** FOUND 09:34:17.02 +49:03:26.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53440_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134 The candidate 53440_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 03.24457    2461163.74457    12.75    10:20:42.34 +45:45:58.7   0129 2673   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_005255_TTUQ1b1x1_399162_K0nAOO6R/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53484_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134 The candidate 53484_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 03.24457    2461163.74457    12.94    10:20:12.40 +47:07:24.5   0352 1876   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_005255_TTUQ1b1x1_399162_K0nAOO6R/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53490_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134 The candidate 53490_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 03.24457    2461163.74457    12.86    09:44:05.60 +42:53:14.6   3801 4983   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_005255_TTUQ1b1x1_399162_K0nAOO6R/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53503_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134 The candidate 53503_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 03.24457    2461163.74457    12.92    09:21:24.39 +43:42:46.5   6313 4631   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_005255_TTUQ1b1x1_399162_K0nAOO6R/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53516_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134 The candidate 53516_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 03.24457    2461163.74457    13.17    09:11:14.61 +45:54:33.9   7411 3314   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_005255_TTUQ1b1x1_399162_K0nAOO6R/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53554_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134 The candidate 53554_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 03.24457    2461163.74457    13.24    09:49:44.54 +49:48:52.5   3644 0767   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_005255_TTUQ1b1x1_399162_K0nAOO6R/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53574_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134 The candidate 53574_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 03.24457    2461163.74457    13.21    09:51:16.99 +49:12:06.6   3452 1118   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_005255_TTUQ1b1x1_399162_K0nAOO6R/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53637_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134 The candidate 53637_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 03.24457    2461163.74457    13.27    09:05:24.20 +48:33:42.9   7984 1697   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_005255_TTUQ1b1x1_399162_K0nAOO6R/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits **** FOUND 09:05:24.23 +48:33:42.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53646_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134 The candidate 53646_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 03.24457    2461163.74457    12.92    10:15:49.43 +42:26:29.6   0250 4763   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_005255_TTUQ1b1x1_399162_K0nAOO6R/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53675_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134 The candidate 53675_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 03.24457    2461163.74457    13.39    10:13:33.10 +46:17:44.5   0941 2507   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_005255_TTUQ1b1x1_399162_K0nAOO6R/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53691_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134 The candidate 53691_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 03.24389    2461163.74389    13.33    10:00:06.95 +42:15:41.7   1986 5156   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_005255_TTUQ1b1x1_399162_K0nAOO6R/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-51-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 03.24457    2461163.74457    13.56    10:00:07.22 +42:15:40.4   1982 5155   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_005255_TTUQ1b1x1_399162_K0nAOO6R/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53701_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134 The candidate 53701_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 03.24389    2461163.74389    13.36    09:35:49.58 +50:56:21.8   5042 0210   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_005255_TTUQ1b1x1_399162_K0nAOO6R/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-51-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 03.24457    2461163.74457    13.15    09:35:49.21 +50:56:20.6   5040 0210   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_005255_TTUQ1b1x1_399162_K0nAOO6R/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53728_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134 The candidate 53728_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 03.24457    2461163.74457    13.49    09:46:19.47 +41:10:51.6   3451 5989   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_005255_TTUQ1b1x1_399162_K0nAOO6R/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53736_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134 The candidate 53736_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 03.24457    2461163.74457    13.27    10:01:33.49 +44:36:58.6   2035 3721   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_005255_TTUQ1b1x1_399162_K0nAOO6R/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53741_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134 The candidate 53741_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 03.24457    2461163.74457    13.51    08:56:24.41 +45:45:50.8   8990 3351   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_005255_TTUQ1b1x1_399162_K0nAOO6R/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits **** FOUND 08:56:24.45 +45:45:51.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53746_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134 The candidate 53746_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 03.24457    2461163.74457    13.45    09:31:55.47 +48:53:33.9   5341 1470   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_005255_TTUQ1b1x1_399162_K0nAOO6R/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53762_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134 The candidate 53762_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 03.24457    2461163.74457    13.46    09:52:15.41 +41:47:12.4   2823 5552   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_005255_TTUQ1b1x1_399162_K0nAOO6R/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53769_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134 The candidate 53769_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 03.24457    2461163.74457    13.30    10:16:51.62 +48:42:58.4   0884 0997   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_005255_TTUQ1b1x1_399162_K0nAOO6R/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53772_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134 The candidate 53772_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 03.24457    2461163.74457    13.23    10:17:22.83 +43:13:13.1   0171 4264   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_005255_TTUQ1b1x1_399162_K0nAOO6R/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53836_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134 The candidate 53836_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 03.24457    2461163.74457    13.59    10:05:53.64 +45:37:28.4   1670 3048   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_005255_TTUQ1b1x1_399162_K0nAOO6R/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits **** FOUND 10:05:53.46 +45:37:30.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53856_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134 The candidate 53856_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 03.24457    2461163.74457    13.59    10:20:16.92 +46:38:37.1   0284 2160   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_005255_TTUQ1b1x1_399162_K0nAOO6R/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53859_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134 The candidate 53859_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 03.24457    2461163.74457    13.72    09:08:56.65 +44:03:39.7   7673 4429   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_005255_TTUQ1b1x1_399162_K0nAOO6R/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits **** FOUND 09:08:56.44 +44:03:39.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53865_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134 The candidate 53865_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 03.24457    2461163.74457    13.53    10:14:08.08 +44:59:41.2   0732 3271   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_005255_TTUQ1b1x1_399162_K0nAOO6R/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53882_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134 The candidate 53882_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 03.24457    2461163.74457    13.59    10:15:31.39 +42:55:39.3   0341 4478   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_005255_TTUQ1b1x1_399162_K0nAOO6R/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53885_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134 The candidate 53885_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 03.24457    2461163.74457    13.52    08:59:58.19 +49:52:52.6   8498 0872   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_005255_TTUQ1b1x1_399162_K0nAOO6R/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53899_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134 The candidate 53899_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 03.24457    2461163.74457    13.65    09:49:13.00 +41:42:48.2   3159 5634   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_005255_TTUQ1b1x1_399162_K0nAOO6R/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53914_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134 The candidate 53914_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 03.24389    2461163.74389    13.76    09:01:59.00 +47:30:10.6   8357 2326   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_005255_TTUQ1b1x1_399162_K0nAOO6R/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-51-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0133.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 03.24457    2461163.74457    13.77    09:01:59.00 +47:30:10.1   8354 2326   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_005255_TTUQ1b1x1_399162_K0nAOO6R/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53974_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134 The candidate 53974_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 03.24457    2461163.74457    13.79    10:08:46.20 +45:55:54.1   1400 2814   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_005255_TTUQ1b1x1_399162_K0nAOO6R/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53987_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134 The candidate 53987_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 03.24457    2461163.74457    13.63    10:10:12.56 +41:29:47.2   0774 5442   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_005255_TTUQ1b1x1_399162_K0nAOO6R/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54022_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134 The candidate 54022_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 03.24457    2461163.74457    14.08    10:07:45.23 +45:25:38.7   1455 3133   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_005255_TTUQ1b1x1_399162_K0nAOO6R/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54045_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134 The candidate 54045_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 03.24457    2461163.74457    13.89    09:03:49.83 +44:49:53.7   8217 3950   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_005255_TTUQ1b1x1_399162_K0nAOO6R/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54054_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134 The candidate 54054_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 03.24457    2461163.74457    13.97    09:30:42.51 +42:05:39.6   5250 5569   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_005255_TTUQ1b1x1_399162_K0nAOO6R/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54070_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134 The candidate 54070_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 03.24457    2461163.74457    13.88    09:10:40.96 +48:49:53.8   7451 1547   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_005255_TTUQ1b1x1_399162_K0nAOO6R/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54071_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134 The candidate 54071_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 03.24457    2461163.74457    13.61    10:18:56.39 +44:46:49.5   0193 3299   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_005255_TTUQ1b1x1_399162_K0nAOO6R/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54085_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134 The candidate 54085_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 03.24457    2461163.74457    13.92    09:14:45.59 +41:37:43.6   7039 5906   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_005255_TTUQ1b1x1_399162_K0nAOO6R/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54088_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134 The candidate 54088_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 03.24457    2461163.74457    13.88    09:54:21.91 +49:46:21.6   3193 0737   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_005255_TTUQ1b1x1_399162_K0nAOO6R/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54091_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134 The candidate 54091_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 03.24457    2461163.74457    13.79    09:26:16.92 +44:34:25.0   5801 4095   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_005255_TTUQ1b1x1_399162_K0nAOO6R/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits **** FOUND 09:26:16.88 +44:34:23.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54101_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134 The candidate 54101_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 03.24457    2461163.74457    13.85    08:55:09.29 +45:30:50.5   9133 3495   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_005255_TTUQ1b1x1_399162_K0nAOO6R/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54106_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134 The candidate 54106_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 03.24457    2461163.74457    14.34    10:07:59.01 +50:10:53.4   1913 0287   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_005255_TTUQ1b1x1_399162_K0nAOO6R/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54124_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134 The candidate 54124_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 03.24457    2461163.74457    13.79    09:49:14.88 +48:42:34.7   3619 1437   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_005255_TTUQ1b1x1_399162_K0nAOO6R/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54155_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134 The candidate 54155_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 03.24457    2461163.74457    13.99    10:12:27.41 +46:45:02.5   1105 2257   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_005255_TTUQ1b1x1_399162_K0nAOO6R/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54158_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134 The candidate 54158_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 03.24457    2461163.74457    14.28    10:14:24.63 +48:55:44.3   1151 0919   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_005255_TTUQ1b1x1_399162_K0nAOO6R/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54159_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134 The candidate 54159_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 03.24457    2461163.74457    14.26    09:39:42.09 +50:59:32.2   4674 0150   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_005255_TTUQ1b1x1_399162_K0nAOO6R/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54235_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134 The candidate 54235_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 03.24457    2461163.74457    14.23    09:25:18.90 +43:19:36.8   5879 4851   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_005255_TTUQ1b1x1_399162_K0nAOO6R/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54269_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134 The candidate 54269_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 03.24457    2461163.74457    14.28    09:57:09.77 +41:18:20.2   2233 5775   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_005255_TTUQ1b1x1_399162_K0nAOO6R/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54280_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134 The candidate 54280_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 03.24457    2461163.74457    13.92    10:16:42.91 +44:05:31.5   0349 3757   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_005255_TTUQ1b1x1_399162_K0nAOO6R/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54304_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134 The candidate 54304_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 03.24457    2461163.74457    14.14    09:11:00.89 +48:26:51.6   7420 1780   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_005255_TTUQ1b1x1_399162_K0nAOO6R/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54312_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134 The candidate 54312_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 03.24457    2461163.74457    14.21    09:36:15.51 +46:41:15.4   4821 2769   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_005255_TTUQ1b1x1_399162_K0nAOO6R/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54335_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134 The candidate 54335_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 03.24457    2461163.74457    14.14    09:29:16.97 +48:37:57.7   5595 1640   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_005255_TTUQ1b1x1_399162_K0nAOO6R/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 07744_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134 The candidate 07744_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 05 03.24457    2461163.74457    11.18    09:08:47.98 +42:09:21.9   7711 5584   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_005255_TTUQ1b1x1_399162_K0nAOO6R/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-52-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits **** FOUND 09:08:47.99 +42:09:22.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-09-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### ########### Completed UMa-09-Q1b1x1 ########### The analysis was running at tau We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt #### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources #### ################################################################################### renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' # Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix) Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars). ################################################################################### 0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels) This does not look like a test run ################################################################################### exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES #### Nothing to add to the exclusion list #### The observatory MPC code is V36 ############################################################ Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461163.74389251 -observatory V36 01:53:29.54 +09:52:09.5 Mercury (-1.0mag) 04:35:31.89 +23:01:20.4 Venus (-3.9mag) 01:06:42.05 +06:08:51.1 Mars (1.2mag) 07:21:55.73 +22:29:47.7 Jupiter (-2.0mag) 00:36:36.29 +01:34:35.1 Saturn (0.9mag) 03:51:32.90 +19:59:36.4 Uranus (5.8mag) 00:12:57.75 -00:02:08.2 Neptune (7.8mag) 20:34:13.03 -22:54:28.2 Pluto (14.5mag) 15:45:18.18 -25:34:56.1 Moon (-12.3mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 363 May 3 00:54 planets.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461163.74389251: 07:21:49.25 +22:30:01.8 Io (5.9mag) 07:21:48.57 +22:30:06.6 Europa (6.0mag) 07:21:37.66 +22:30:28.6 Ganymede (5.4mag) 07:22:29.47 +22:28:29.8 Callisto (6.7mag) 07:24:23.20 +22:10:39.8 Himalia (15.4mag) 07:21:55.62 +22:29:49.9 Thebe (16.3mag) 07:24:50.12 +22:39:39.7 Elara (17.4mag) 07:21:58.02 +23:00:45.7 Pasiphae (17.5mag) 07:29:49.01 +22:29:12.4 Carme (18.6mag) 00:36:32.30 +01:35:03.9 Titan (8.7mag) 00:36:33.05 +01:34:48.9 Rhea (10.0mag) 00:36:10.16 +01:32:35.1 Iapetus (11.5mag) 00:36:51.55 +01:34:28.8 Hyperion (14.8mag) 00:37:58.05 +01:41:23.1 Phoebe (16.8mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 569 May 3 00:54 moons.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461163.74389251: 16:38:39.19 -26:01:47.9 JWST 17:59:39.11 +35:28:45.6 Chandra 18:25:05.87 -29:11:43.7 XMM-Newton -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 May 3 00:54 spacecraft.txt ############################################################ Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461163.74389251 -observatory V36 -> Warning: Longitude 255.61742 is outside valid range [-180, 180] 06:42:59.31 +29:14:53.6 17.8mag P/2009 WX51 (Catalina) 18:55:53.30 -29:54:08.3 13.8mag P/2010 H2 (Vales) 05:20:14.95 -68:56:00.0 17.4mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein) 05:36:52.54 +31:34:23.7 17.3mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS) 17:27:20.15 +12:29:04.1 17.7mag C/2021 G2 (ATLAS) 23:13:44.17 +29:58:43.8 17.1mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS) 04:49:48.75 +26:27:49.4 16.2mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS) 09:08:54.88 +31:57:35.2 16.4mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS) 08:35:05.12 +01:30:40.7 17.4mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS) 18:48:04.22 +19:52:58.7 17.6mag C/2023 A3 (Tsuchinshan-ATLAS) 15:34:12.40 -11:16:20.3 17.5mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS) 09:01:48.38 -09:20:18.8 17.8mag C/2023 F3 (ATLAS) 22:08:16.27 +64:01:19.4 17.6mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon) 18:59:23.17 -04:11:50.1 13.9mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS) 19:16:52.87 +88:07:56.9 17.9mag C/2023 X2 (Lemmon) 06:29:27.74 +63:32:46.2 17.3mag C/2024 A1 (ATLAS) 05:47:23.98 +22:50:34.1 12.1mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos) 16:06:49.15 +09:07:36.2 17.3mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS) 20:23:34.74 +20:10:59.0 14.4mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS) 03:42:25.87 -19:55:48.7 16.2mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS) 05:32:05.20 +41:20:08.0 17.8mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov) 12:34:19.54 +52:09:00.2 16.0mag C/2025 L1 (ATLAS) 03:54:39.44 -29:11:35.7 18.0mag C/2025 Q3 (ATLAS) 04:25:08.30 -02:23:36.4 8.8mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS) 12:47:09.78 +03:55:40.9 17.3mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS) 05:00:23.99 +01:38:40.9 16.8mag C/2026 A1 (MAPS) 00:45:10.78 +39:54:15.9 15.1mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao) 19:16:15.71 -08:47:36.6 10.8mag 10P/Tempel 14:37:41.85 +01:01:32.8 15.5mag 24P/Schaumasse 10:59:34.82 -01:04:32.5 15.8mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 10:39:58.68 -03:01:56.5 17.3mag 43P/Wolf-Harrington 02:15:31.75 +20:20:23.8 17.4mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson 07:44:22.34 +33:08:03.3 16.9mag 63P/Wild 23:50:06.34 -09:29:42.5 15.7mag 65P/Gunn 04:51:32.46 +26:35:36.4 16.1mag 76P/West-Kohoutek-Ikemura 01:44:23.26 +11:30:49.1 14.1mag 78P/Gehrels 23:52:35.97 -04:20:27.9 14.9mag 88P/Howell 03:01:00.80 +24:51:21.3 15.0mag 93P/Lovas 05:29:16.64 +33:01:54.0 16.0mag 123P/West-Hartley 08:51:33.96 +30:28:23.9 16.3mag 124P/Mrkos 03:00:21.98 +16:12:06.3 16.4mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt 03:21:40.21 +16:24:53.9 17.6mag 131P/Mueller 02:59:11.75 +17:55:23.5 10.8mag 141P/Machholz 03:04:59.35 +10:57:25.8 10.8mag 141P-A/Machholz 01:45:06.66 +06:47:13.2 11.0mag 141P-D/Machholz 01:51:13.67 +07:10:44.8 14.9mag 162P/SidingSpring 22:23:36.42 -07:27:24.4 18.0mag 218P/LINEAR 17:15:45.95 -11:48:56.6 16.1mag 235P/LINEAR 06:12:42.21 +35:38:51.6 17.0mag 240P/NEAT 07:48:37.78 -03:31:35.5 17.9mag 242P/Spahr 23:00:10.74 -15:55:11.6 17.4mag 260P/McNaught 02:35:06.51 +24:42:43.7 17.8mag 295P/LINEAR 15:34:29.87 +07:55:52.4 17.4mag 391P/Kowalski 07:42:23.63 +21:20:00.1 17.7mag 450P/LONEOS 06:02:02.09 +44:01:13.5 17.6mag 493P/LONEOS -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.8K May 3 00:54 comets.txt ############################################################ List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html : 21:00:10.71 -32:17:03.90 AT2026kis 2026-04-27.36 16.15 14:32:57.37 -58:13:26.40 ASASSN-26dc 2026-04-27.27 13.42 15:32:05.35 -43:54:34.60 ASASSN-26db 2026-04-27.37 16.06 16:34:34.94 -54:34:58.20 ASASSN-26da 2026-04-25.14 15.99 10:06:55.04 -01:13:49.70 SN2026jsg 2026-04-24.99 16.28 15:15:57.17 +56:18:32.80 SN2026kid 2026-04-24.52 -3.65 07:58:28.45 +57:03:42.40 AT2026kcf 2026-04-24.2 16.89 11:38:21.80 -50:43:06.50 SN2026jkb 2026-04-24.24 15.38 10:06:11.41 -39:41:04.20 AT2026dil 2026-04-24.2 16.85 14:21:40.08 +13:13:46.30 SN2026jlm 2026-04-22.16 15.12 10:53:55.47 -16:06:07.00 ASASSN-26cz 2026-04-22.24 16.32 21:00:10.71 -32:17:03.90 2026-04-27.36 16.15 13:45:02.03 +15:17:14.50 ASASSN-26cy 2026-04-21.27 15.78 13:20:52.22 -35:57:03.60 AT2026jcm 2026-04-19.01 16.65 13:36:15.66 -36:53:48.40 SN 2026iqy 2026-04-18.92 17.31 06:34:01.33 -40:07:34.00 ASASSN-26cx 2026-04-19.07 16.16 23:33:57.97 -45:12:11.90 SN 2026idu 2026-04-19.41 15.9 12:10:50.92 +66:55:31.20 SN 2026icv 2026-04-17.14 16.03 21:36:59.06 -60:43:35.90 ASASSN-26cv 2026-04-17.35 -1.18 08:13:26.26 -27:07:30.50 ASASSN-26cw 2026-04-17.07 -1.01 14:49:14.13 -27:29:20.60 ASASSN-26cu 2026-04-16.06 14.03 17:21:59.44 -38:54:04.60 ASASSN-26ct 2026-04-14.4 15.15 15:25:54.99 +07:49:24.50 SN2026huo 2026-04-12.14 16.96 21:00:10.71 -32:17:03.90 2026-04-27.36 16.15 12:23:20.40 +04:53:39.10 AT2026ixd 2026-04-12.14 17.65 17:46:09.76 -61:19:50.40 SN2026icy 2026-04-12.2 17.03 09:25:46.42 +02:13:46.30 SN2026gud 2026-04-11.98 16.49 16:52:15.46 -60:27:45.90 ASASSN-26cs 2026-04-12.4 15.5 04:20:55.37 -51:15:31.10 ASASSN-26cr 2026-04-12.01 15.37 22:25:39.35 +36:45:06.90 AT2026ihl 2026-04-10.48 14.21 19:40:44.94 +00:41:03.80 AT2026imw 2026-04-10.32 16.06 19:52:04.70 +05:53:33.50 ASASSN-26cq 2026-04-9.31 14.98 16:08:18.39 -64:11:08.80 ASASSN-26cp 2026-04-9.14 13.64 09:22:22.90 -61:02:43.70 SN2026idh 2026-04-7.97 16.34 05:06:54.12 -19:42:26.40 AT2026imr 2026-04-8 17.49 07:14:55.34 -36:03:21.40 AT2026hei 2026-04-8.12 16.7 21:35:33.14 -19:01:34.80 AT2026ihm 2026-04-8.36 16.7 04:28:24.08 -32:25:35.30 AT2026imo 2026-04-8.02 16.81 05:10:35.79 -39:38:40.80 SN 2026hnn 2026-04-7.04 17.07 09:54:32.04 -01:17:25.80 ASASSN-26cn 2026-04-7.01 15.58 07:46:24.43 -77:29:35.90 ASASSN-26co 2026-04-7.15 14.93 05:00:45.52 -29:51:06.20 AT2026hvw 2026-04-6.03 16.51 19:49:33.10 -23:37:11.00 ASASSN-26cl 2026-04-5.29 14.98 19:32:43.55 -22:39:33.40 ASASSN-26cm 2026-04-4.3 13.88 18:08:57.38 +76:48:23.60 ASASSN-26ck 2026-04-2.37 15.38 16:16:36.10 +44:52:30.20 AT2026hyy 2026-04-2.58 13.81 21:55:23.31 -34:48:53.90 ASASSN-26cj 2026-03-30.4 -1.47 11:19:50.81 -27:51:50.40 SN2026gvk 2026-03-30 15.28 11:53:57.02 -23:09:46.20 SN2026gzx 2026-03-28.75 15.27 07:13:46.14 -33:10:15.70 ASASSN-26ci 2026-03-28.15 15.14 09:03:36.09 -67:58:13.00 SN2026hkg 2026-03-28.19 15.82 07:03:00.72 +39:14:43.00 SN2026fin 2026-03-28.27 15.82 05:35:42.80 -63:44:05.50 ASASSN-26ch 2026-03-27.86 13.02 11:23:19.04 +34:22:38.00 SN2026fwt 2026-03-27.3 16.56 19:03:49.79 +37:04:05.20 ASASSN-26ce 2026-03-26.56 16.3 20:26:56.07 -52:54:06.50 AT2026hiy 2026-03-26.35 16.95 05:25:54.76 -30:15:35.80 ASASSN-26cg 2026-03-25.07 16.88 06:57:16.49 -26:54:37.20 SN2026fzb 2026-03-25.14 15.8 14:37:38.23 -43:00:52.30 ASASSN-26cd 2026-03-24.24 12.52 17:34:53.03 +06:04:29.70 AT2026gzl 2026-03-23.27 15.82 08:30:02.60 -35:12:47.50 ASASSN-26cf 2026-03-23.2 14.82 16:54:25.33 +37:49:56.60 SN 2026evz 2026-03-21.32 17.54 17:06:19.20 -18:54:19.50 ASASSN-26bx 2026-03-21.25 16.39 19:01:16.28 -29:29:23.10 ASASSN-26bw 2026-03-21.33 15.81 08:46:05.75 +10:47:39.80 ASASSN-26ca 2026-03-21.13 14.27 12:14:58.16 +63:47:16.20 SN 2026fvx 2026-03-21.12 15.6 18:02:55.90 -75:23:02.60 ASASSN-26bz 2026-03-21.32 16.16 12:16:02.87 -53:16:33.70 ASASSN-26cc 2026-03-20.08 3.93 13:08:21.85 +29:13:44.20 SN 2026fmh 2026-03-20.16 -0.33 19:56:38.48 -34:45:21.50 ASASSN-26cb 2026-03-20.35 -3.26 14:32:41.15 -41:38:48.50 ASASSN-26by 2026-03-20.15 -1.31 13:00:42.99 +37:18:34.60 SN2026fjc 2026-03-19.5 15.97 06:02:44.21 -04:11:06.20 ASASSN-26bv 2026-03-19.19 15.67 12:20:27.96 -45:55:38.40 ASASSN-26bt 2026-03-18.8 16.32 07:49:57.30 -56:14:35.10 ASASSN-26bu 2026-03-19.19 15.74 06:04:29.75 +53:23:34.00 SN 2026eza 2026-03-18.2 17.48 11:54:57.87 +69:19:28.90 AT2026fsf 2026-03-18.14 16.95 10:44:46.95 +58:27:29.30 SN 2026enn 2026-03-18.13 17.53 20:45:54.04 -73:26:43.00 AT 2026ezy 2026-03-18.13 16.83 06:53:18.10 -59:10:49.30 ASASSN-26bs 2026-03-18.02 16.93 07:45:09.29 -62:14:36.20 ASASSN-26br 2026-03-16.16 16.78 19:24:27.93 -52:04:36.40 AT 2023uk 2026-03-16.35 14.2 04:52:54.50 -15:20:57.10 AT2026fhw 2026-03-14.06 SDSS 11:10:34.24 +02:58:48.10 SN2026drr 2026-03-14.08 0.2 07:26:45.73 -27:45:13.90 ASASSN-26bo 2026-03-14.17 13.8 16:35:46.94 +58:12:28.40 SN2026ebt 2026-03-12.41 17.12 13:01:19.45 +15:42:15.00 SN2026ehe 2026-03-12.11 -0.29 09:15:55.41 +10:08:09.70 SN2026efq 2026-03-12.16 0.06 03:31:20.92 -35:29:29.00 SN2026evh 2026-03-12.05 17.29 06:26:19.15 -85:18:28.10 AT2026ffp 2026-03-12.16 0.37 14:16:42.30 -41:18:36.50 AT2026fij 2026-03-12.05 15.97 10:45:04.71 +00:06:13.10 SN 2026exe 2026-03-11.78 16.48 18:07:45.58 +69:43:01.00 SN2026ess 2026-03-12.37 17.37 13:11:03.58 +49:06:31.80 AT2026ewa 2026-03-12.42 16.77 15:03:25.23 -63:11:22.20 ASASSN-26bp 2026-03-11.92 13.33 13:09:37.25 -35:50:25.20 AT2024cmo 2026-03-11.12 16.29 13:06:01.97 -15:50:14.40 AT2026fdy 2026-03-10.33 16.68 11:30:09.70 -47:26:45.00 ASASSN-26bn 2026-03-10.3 15.14 05:03:25.25 -24:16:50.40 (= Gaia 2026-03-9.09 14.32 03:42:32.53 -04:17:53.70 ASASSN-26bm 2026-03-8.04 15.22 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.8K May 3 00:54 asassn_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html : 08:01:11.02 -03:43:14.1 TCP J08011102-0343141 2026-02-08.8090 15.10Cmag 05:19:15.40 -02:04:51.5 TCP J05191540-0204515 2026-02-13.4306 14.5mag 10:52:41.26 +36:40:08.9 TCP J10524126+3640089 2026-02-17.6065 17.4mag 05:50:50.81 +36:22:45.1 TCP J05505081+3622451 2026-02-17.5511 15.7mag 00:42:51.33 +41:13:49.1 PNV J00425133+4113491 2026-02-20.738 18.3mag 00:43:04.88 +41:29:41.4 PNV J00430488+4129414 2026-02-20.5923 18.84Cmag 17:43:29.74 +11:24:00.3 TCP J17432974+1124003 2026-02-22.3773 13.6mag 09:55:01.59 +69:08:42.7 PNV J09550159+6908427 2026-02-20.893 19.0mag 07:03:25.76 -12:41:40.1 TCP J07032576-1241401 2026-03-10.4268 15.4mag 00:42:36.82 +41:16:05.8 PNV J00423682+4116058 2026-03-12.5744 17.24Cmag 07:26:45.79 -27:45:14.1 TCP J07264579-2745141 2026-03-17.4417 14.8mag 17:57:19.56 -28:08:14.7 TCP J17571956-2808147 2026-03-19.7972 14.5mag 08:46:05.73 +10:47:39.7 TCP J08460573+1047397 2026-03-21.1936 14.5mag 09:55:38.83 +69:05:21.7 PNV J09553883+6905217 2026-04-01.893 19.4mag 19:32:43.67 -22:39:30.7 TCP J19324367-2239307 2026-04-05.4395 13.6mag 16:16:36.03 +44:52:28.9 TCP J16163603+4452289 2026-04-05.6655 14.2mag 00:43:38.36 +41:15:32.4 PNV J00433836+4115324 2026-04-08.079 17.2mag 15:41:11.68 +59:18:26.8 TCP J15411168+5918268 2026-04-12.9625 19.2mag 00:43:35.02 +41:46:28.0 PNV J00433502+4146280 2026-04-23.056 15.9mag 00:42:55.64 +41:14:12.2 PNV J00425564+4114122 2026-04-24.042 16.2mag -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 188K May 3 00:54 tocp_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ : 10:10:53.458 +45:56:52.48 SN 2026knu 2026-04-20.18 19.5784 13:23:31.702 -27:27:16.87 AT 2026knt 2026-04-21.45 19.6 14:59:13.174 -10:47:02.79 AT 2026kns 2026-04-09.59 20.1 14:45:20.668 -24:47:31.93 AT 2026knr 2026-03-24.65 20.36 11:45:24.981 +14:40:44.45 AT 2026knq 2026-04-13.92 20.18 04:52:30.865 -15:17:09.10 AT 2026knp 2026-04-20.71 18.098 17:25:02.776 +69:43:35.23 AT 2026kno 2026-04-23.10 19.208 15:15:42.943 -39:27:45.41 AT 2026knn 2026-04-14.63 19.62 21:02:34.025 +19:12:44.83 AT 2026knm 2026-04-22.60 18.74 14:38:36.298 -39:37:27.88 AT 2026knl 2026-04-21.52 20.1 13:24:43.943 +16:55:43.96 AT 2026knk 2026-04-20.96 20.03 13:55:11.417 +21:19:35.16 AT 2026knj 2026-04-20.98 19.3 16:21:58.180 +07:39:22.34 AT 2026kni 2026-04-22.11 19.97 18:25:00.619 +56:31:13.17 AT 2026knh 2026-04-14.18 19.89 11:52:14.846 +19:25:04.67 AT 2026kng 2026-04-12.92 20.24 17:52:14.690 -78:03:43.36 AT 2026kne 2026-04-23.29 18.712 19:46:54.481 -51:39:39.32 AT 2026knd 2026-04-20.32 17.94 21:24:26.061 +26:56:11.62 AT 2026knc 2026-04-23.59 17.66 11:18:30.556 -08:06:31.77 AT 2026knb 2026-04-22.86 19.129 14:56:59.281 +45:09:43.33 AT 2026kna 2026-04-23.01 19.329 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 30K May 3 00:54 tns_transients_list.txt

Profiling:

CPU temperature: 87 C