This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_005055_TTUQ1b1x1_384156_ya0biP4a
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 03.2428 2461163.7428 9.97 11:37:18.54 +02:10:58.3
264.35062 59.38327 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 2.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.20 Massalia -0 0 1 10.3 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 11:37:18.54 +02:10:58.3: 15.45 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 11:37:18.54 +02:10:58.3: 15.51 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 03.2428* 11 37 18.54 +02 10 58.3 10.0 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461163.7428,9.97,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260503.2428 9.97CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 03.2428 2461163.7428 11.04 11:10:50.77 +05:27:34.6
250.56904 57.71039 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 2.6 pix
The object was found in VSX 0" S Leo
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
9.500 V 14.900 V 2443591.00000 189.800000000000 M3e-M6e:
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 11:10:50.77 +05:27:34.6: 11.95 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 11:10:50.77 +05:27:34.6: 11.95 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.95 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 03.2428* 11 10 50.77 +05 27 34.6 11.0 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
S Leo,2461163.7428,11.04,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
S Leo 20260503.2428 11.04CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 03.2428 2461163.7428 12.12 11:23:38.80 +06:16:47.0
253.94005 60.50625 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 2.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.65 Cybele 1 0 1 12.2 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 11:23:38.80 +06:16:47.0: 15.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 11:23:38.80 +06:16:47.0: 16.03 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 03.2428* 11 23 38.80 +06 16 47.0 12.1 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461163.7428,12.12,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260503.2428 12.12CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 03.2428 2461163.7428 12.81 11:08:13.17 +01:43:16.5
254.33181 54.54553 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.5" and 2.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.120 Lachesis -1 0 1 12.8 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 11:08:13.17 +01:43:16.5: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 11:08:13.17 +01:43:16.5: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 03.2428* 11 08 13.17 +01 43 16.5 12.8 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461163.7428,12.81,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260503.2428 12.81CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 03.2428 2461163.7428 12.89 10:48:22.44 +04:17:24.6
245.36519 52.81638 galactic Sex Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.1" and 2.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.270 Anahita -1 1 1 13.2 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 10:48:22.44 +04:17:24.6: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 10:48:22.44 +04:17:24.6: 15.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 03.2428* 10 48 22.44 +04 17 24.6 12.9 U Sex 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461163.7428,12.89,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260503.2428 12.89CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 03.2428 2461163.7428 13.04 10:38:20.23 +08:00:30.6
237.94598 53.16269 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 2.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.356 Liguria -1 1 2 13.2 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 10:38:20.23 +08:00:30.6: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 10:38:20.23 +08:00:30.6: 15.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 03.2428* 10 38 20.23 +08 00 30.6 13.0 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461163.7428,13.04,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260503.2428 13.04CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 03.2428 2461163.7428 13.31 11:13:28.87 +04:56:34.7
252.12498 57.80091 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.2" and 2.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.453 Tea 1 0 1 13.7 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 11:13:28.87 +04:56:34.7: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 11:13:28.87 +04:56:34.7: 16.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 03.2428* 11 13 28.87 +04 56 34.7 13.3 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461163.7428,13.31,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260503.2428 13.31CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 03.2428 2461163.7428 13.52 11:35:57.31 +04:22:44.0
261.25624 60.98691 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 2.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.207 Hedda 0 1 1 13.8 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 11:35:57.31 +04:22:44.0: 15.73 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 11:35:57.31 +04:22:44.0: 15.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 03.2428* 11 35 57.31 +04 22 44.0 13.5 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461163.7428,13.52,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260503.2428 13.52CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 03.2428 2461163.7428 13.57 10:58:06.29 +10:44:59.5
239.02088 58.72358 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.7" and 3.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.140 Siwa -0 1 1 13.6 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 10:58:06.29 +10:44:59.5: 15.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 10:58:06.29 +10:44:59.5: 15.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 03.2428* 10 58 06.29 +10 44 59.5 13.6 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461163.7428,13.57,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260503.2428 13.57CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 03.2428 2461163.7428 13.69 11:00:51.61 +03:49:47.0
249.51356 54.79414 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 2.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.189 Phthia -1 0 1 13.7 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 11:00:51.61 +03:49:47.0: 15.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 11:00:51.61 +03:49:47.0: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 03.2428* 11 00 51.61 +03 49 47.0 13.7 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461163.7428,13.69,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260503.2428 13.69CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 03.2428 2461163.7428 11.94 11:01:11.09 +05:12:14.3
247.86263 55.80006 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 2.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.19 Fortuna -1 0 1 12.2 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 11:01:11.09 +05:12:14.3: 16.03 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 11:01:11.09 +05:12:14.3: 15.97 +/- 0.31 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.97 +/- 0.31
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 03.2428* 11 01 11.09 +05 12 14.3 11.9 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461163.7428,11.94,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260503.2428 11.94CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461146.72985719 16.04.2026 05:30:49.661 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
First image: 2461146.72985719 16.04.2026 05:30:49.661 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
Last image: 2461163.74308667 03.05.2026 05:49:52.688 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_005055_TTUQ1b1x1_384156_ya0biP4a/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 2
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.59
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 2 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 5511
Objects passed selection criteria: 5506
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 4529.25
Average stars matched: 4373 (96.5502 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 111780 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Apr 29 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-35-gf9552f12
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-29)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun May 3 00:52:04 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461146.72985719 16.04.2026 05:30:49.661 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
First image: 2461146.72985719 16.04.2026 05:30:49.661 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
Last image: 2461163.74308667 03.05.2026 05:49:52.688 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_005055_TTUQ1b1x1_384156_ya0biP4a/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 66
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.32
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 10 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 28849
Objects passed selection criteria: 28783
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.2 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.2 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 24595.8
Average stars matched: 23439.8 (95.3 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 132840 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Apr 29 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-35-gf9552f12
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-29)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun May 3 00:53:22 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_005055_TTUQ1b1x1_384156_ya0biP4a/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-48-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0131.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_005055_TTUQ1b1x1_384156_ya0biP4a/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_005055_TTUQ1b1x1_384156_ya0biP4a/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-48-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0131.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_005055_TTUQ1b1x1_384156_ya0biP4a/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461163.74244035
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits'
wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits'
wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-48-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0131.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-48-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0131.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-48-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0131.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-48-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0131.fits'
wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:08:37.871 +05:58:55.04 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-48-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0131.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-48-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:08:30.451 +05:59:43.96 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:08:37.871 +05:58:55.04
Second-epoch image center 11:08:30.451 +05:59:43.96
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0336 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
Image size: 941.6'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:08:31.463 +05:59:41.69 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:08:37.871 +05:58:55.04
Second-epoch image center 11:08:31.463 +05:59:41.69
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0295 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 11:08:30.451 +05:59:43.96
Second-epoch second image center 11:08:31.463 +05:59:41.69
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00424 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits &> /tmp/tmp.pZu5zWwCD6
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits &> /tmp/tmp.3aWMwNaiAK
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_005055_TTUQ1b1x1_384156_ya0biP4a/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-48-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0131.fits &> /tmp/tmp.RgNJQCYAxh
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_005055_TTUQ1b1x1_384156_ya0biP4a/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-48-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_005055_TTUQ1b1x1_384156_ya0biP4a/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits &> /tmp/tmp.lB5XPblKBJ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_005055_TTUQ1b1x1_384156_ya0biP4a/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits and wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits and wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits and wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits) and catalog (wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 6014 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 159.1319 to 175.0599 deg, Dec +0.5959 to +11.2736 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 159.1319 to 175.0599 deg, Dec 0.5959 to 11.2736 deg
Loaded 3946 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3223 out of 3349 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3349 out of 6014 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.794900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.794900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.59
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.20
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.20
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 6014 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 159.1319 to 175.0599 deg, Dec +0.5959 to +11.2736 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 159.1319 to 175.0599 deg, Dec 0.5959 to 11.2736 deg
Loaded 3946 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3223 out of 3349 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3349 out of 6014 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits (aperture=6.6)
Read 5979 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 159.0424 to 175.4602 deg, Dec +0.1921 to +11.6322 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 159.0424 to 175.4602 deg, Dec 0.1921 to 11.6322 deg
Loaded 4379 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3233 out of 3365 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3365 out of 5979 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits (aperture=6.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 2 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.5 pix Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
2.2 pix Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
2.7 pix fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-48-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
2.7 pix fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
2.5 pix wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
15.3 mag. Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-48-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.2 (SNR ) 11.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.pZu5zWwCD6 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-03_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_005055_TTUQ1b1x1_384156_ya0biP4a/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=380, passed=6014
Got 6014 stars (including 5628 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6014 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 452 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 933 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5931 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 452 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5929 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5929 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 943 stars left (next iteration limit 1037)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits -region wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.3aWMwNaiAK (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-03_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_005055_TTUQ1b1x1_384156_ya0biP4a/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=392, passed=5979
Got 5979 stars (including 5577 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5979 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 450 to 510 (Dec 0.2 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 933 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5897 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 450 to 510 (Dec 0.2 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5896 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5896 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 943 stars left (next iteration limit 1037)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits -region wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.RgNJQCYAxh (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-03_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_005055_TTUQ1b1x1_384156_ya0biP4a/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_005055_TTUQ1b1x1_384156_ya0biP4a/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-48-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0131.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_005055_TTUQ1b1x1_384156_ya0biP4a/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-48-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_005055_TTUQ1b1x1_384156_ya0biP4a/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-48-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_005055_TTUQ1b1x1_384156_ya0biP4a/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-48-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_005055_TTUQ1b1x1_384156_ya0biP4a/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-48-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_005055_TTUQ1b1x1_384156_ya0biP4a/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-48-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-48-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-48-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-48-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0131.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-48-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0131.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-48-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0131.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-48-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0131.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-48-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_005055_TTUQ1b1x1_384156_ya0biP4a/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-48-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-48-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0131.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=282, passed=3129
Got 3129 stars (including 2845 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-48-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0131.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3129 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 931 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3091 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3090 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3090 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 938 stars left (next iteration limit 1031)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-48-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0131.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-48-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0131.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_005055_TTUQ1b1x1_384156_ya0biP4a/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-48-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0131.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-48-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0131.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-48-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0131.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.lB5XPblKBJ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-03_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_005055_TTUQ1b1x1_384156_ya0biP4a/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_005055_TTUQ1b1x1_384156_ya0biP4a/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_005055_TTUQ1b1x1_384156_ya0biP4a/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_005055_TTUQ1b1x1_384156_ya0biP4a/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_005055_TTUQ1b1x1_384156_ya0biP4a/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_005055_TTUQ1b1x1_384156_ya0biP4a/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_005055_TTUQ1b1x1_384156_ya0biP4a/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_005055_TTUQ1b1x1_384156_ya0biP4a/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=283, passed=3100
Got 3100 stars (including 2816 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3100 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 932 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3061 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3062 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3062 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 941 stars left (next iteration limit 1035)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_005055_TTUQ1b1x1_384156_ya0biP4a/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-48-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-48-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0131.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_005055_TTUQ1b1x1_384156_ya0biP4a/wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-48-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0131.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_005055_TTUQ1b1x1_384156_ya0biP4a/wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Leo-07-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 11:37:18.54 +02:10:58.3: 15.45 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 11:10:50.77 +05:27:34.6: 11.95 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 11:37:18.54 +02:10:58.3: 15.51 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 11:10:50.77 +05:27:34.6: 11.95 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.95 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 11:10:50.77 +05:27:34.6: ref_mag=11.95 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.0334 delta=0.92 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out03293.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20615.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 4s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20615_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132
Preparing report for the candidate 20615_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03293_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132
Preparing report for the candidate 03293_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 6s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Leo-07-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
11:10:50.77 +05:27:34.6
11:37:18.54 +02:10:58.3
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_005055_TTUQ1b1x1_384156_ya0biP4a/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-48-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0131.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_005055_TTUQ1b1x1_384156_ya0biP4a/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_005055_TTUQ1b1x1_384156_ya0biP4a/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-48-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0131.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_005055_TTUQ1b1x1_384156_ya0biP4a/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-48-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-48-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0131.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:08:37.871 +05:58:55.04 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-48-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0131.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-48-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:08:30.451 +05:59:43.96 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:08:37.871 +05:58:55.04
Second-epoch image center 11:08:30.451 +05:59:43.96
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0336 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
Image size: 941.6'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:08:31.463 +05:59:41.69 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:08:37.871 +05:58:55.04
Second-epoch image center 11:08:31.463 +05:59:41.69
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0295 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 11:08:30.451 +05:59:43.96
Second-epoch second image center 11:08:31.463 +05:59:41.69
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00424 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Zmq1gpsmba
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits &> /tmp/tmp.lkxT2c4f0m
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_005055_TTUQ1b1x1_384156_ya0biP4a/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-48-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0131.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ljYrcpCE75
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_005055_TTUQ1b1x1_384156_ya0biP4a/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-48-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_005055_TTUQ1b1x1_384156_ya0biP4a/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits &> /tmp/tmp.qxjtNbgWrt
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_005055_TTUQ1b1x1_384156_ya0biP4a/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits and wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits and wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits and wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits) and catalog (wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 31020 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 159.1320 to 175.0637 deg, Dec +0.5959 to +11.2851 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 159.1320 to 175.0637 deg, Dec 0.5959 to 11.2851 deg
Loaded 3949 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3105 out of 3398 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3398 out of 31020 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.669100
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.669100
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.32
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.35
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.35
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 31020 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 159.1320 to 175.0637 deg, Dec +0.5959 to +11.2851 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 159.1320 to 175.0637 deg, Dec 0.5959 to 11.2851 deg
Loaded 3949 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3105 out of 3398 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3398 out of 31020 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits (aperture=5.1)
Read 32625 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 158.9765 to 175.4716 deg, Dec +0.1922 to +11.6821 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 158.9765 to 175.4716 deg, Dec 0.1922 to 11.6821 deg
Loaded 4428 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3126 out of 3432 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3432 out of 32625 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits (aperture=5.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 59 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
2.1 pix Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
2.4 pix fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-48-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
2.4 pix fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
15.4 mag. Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
14.3 mag. fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-48-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
14.3 mag. fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.3 (SNR ) 13.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.Zmq1gpsmba (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-03_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_005055_TTUQ1b1x1_384156_ya0biP4a/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=18, blended=1265, passed=31002
Got 31002 stars (including 29705 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 31002 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 452 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 935 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30704 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 452 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30706 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30706 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 945 stars left (next iteration limit 1040)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits -region wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.lkxT2c4f0m (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-03_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_005055_TTUQ1b1x1_384156_ya0biP4a/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=12, blended=1301, passed=32613
Got 32613 stars (including 31248 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 32613 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 450 to 510 (Dec 0.2 to 11.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 937 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32299 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 450 to 510 (Dec 0.2 to 11.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32298 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32298 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 947 stars left (next iteration limit 1041)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits -region wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ljYrcpCE75 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-03_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_005055_TTUQ1b1x1_384156_ya0biP4a/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_005055_TTUQ1b1x1_384156_ya0biP4a/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-48-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0131.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_005055_TTUQ1b1x1_384156_ya0biP4a/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-48-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_005055_TTUQ1b1x1_384156_ya0biP4a/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-48-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_005055_TTUQ1b1x1_384156_ya0biP4a/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-48-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_005055_TTUQ1b1x1_384156_ya0biP4a/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-48-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_005055_TTUQ1b1x1_384156_ya0biP4a/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-48-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-48-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-48-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-48-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0131.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-48-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0131.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-48-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0131.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-48-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0131.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-48-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_005055_TTUQ1b1x1_384156_ya0biP4a/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-48-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-48-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0131.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=691, passed=17856
Got 17856 stars (including 17138 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-48-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0131.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 17856 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 450 to 510 (Dec 0.2 to 11.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 930 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17686 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 450 to 510 (Dec 0.2 to 11.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17686 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17686 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 941 stars left (next iteration limit 1035)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-48-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0131.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-48-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0131.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_005055_TTUQ1b1x1_384156_ya0biP4a/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-48-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0131.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-48-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0131.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-48-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0131.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.qxjtNbgWrt (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-03_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_005055_TTUQ1b1x1_384156_ya0biP4a/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_005055_TTUQ1b1x1_384156_ya0biP4a/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_005055_TTUQ1b1x1_384156_ya0biP4a/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_005055_TTUQ1b1x1_384156_ya0biP4a/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_005055_TTUQ1b1x1_384156_ya0biP4a/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_005055_TTUQ1b1x1_384156_ya0biP4a/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_005055_TTUQ1b1x1_384156_ya0biP4a/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_005055_TTUQ1b1x1_384156_ya0biP4a/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=1, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=680, passed=17780
Got 17780 stars (including 17073 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 17780 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 450 to 510 (Dec 0.2 to 11.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 931 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17608 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 450 to 510 (Dec 0.2 to 11.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17607 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17607 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 941 stars left (next iteration limit 1036)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_005055_TTUQ1b1x1_384156_ya0biP4a/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-48-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_005055_TTUQ1b1x1_384156_ya0biP4a/wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-48-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-03_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_005055_TTUQ1b1x1_384156_ya0biP4a/wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Leo-07-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 11:23:38.80 +06:16:47.0: 15.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 11:23:59.21 +05:14:24.1: 13.43 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 10:54:14.94 +01:15:18.3: 12.87 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 10:48:22.44 +04:17:24.6: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 11:23:38.80 +06:16:47.0: 16.03 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 10:54:14.94 +01:15:18.3: 12.96 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 11:23:59.21 +05:14:24.1: 13.21 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.91 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 11:08:13.17 +01:43:16.5: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:54:14.94 +01:15:18.3: ref_mag=12.91 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0570 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.29 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:23:59.21 +05:14:24.1: ref_mag=13.29 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.5090 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 10:38:20.23 +08:00:30.6: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 11:13:28.87 +04:56:34.7: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 10:48:22.44 +04:17:24.6: 15.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 11:08:13.17 +01:43:16.5: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 10:38:20.23 +08:00:30.6: 15.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 11:35:57.31 +04:22:44.0: 15.73 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 10:58:06.29 +10:44:59.5: 15.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 11:13:28.87 +04:56:34.7: 16.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 11:00:51.61 +03:49:47.0: 15.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 11:35:57.31 +04:22:44.0: 15.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 10:58:06.29 +10:44:59.5: 15.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 11:00:51.61 +03:49:47.0: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 11:01:11.09 +05:12:14.3: 16.03 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 11:01:11.09 +05:12:14.3: 15.97 +/- 0.31 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.97 +/- 0.31
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 11:01:11.09 +05:12:14.3: ref_mag=15.97 +/- 0.31 new_mean_mag=11.9353 delta=4.04 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out17628.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54499.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54515.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54520.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54526.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54537.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54548.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54550.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54557.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 8s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 7s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54479_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132
The candidate 54479_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:18:30.23 +10:50:11.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54480_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132
The candidate 54480_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54482_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132
The candidate 54482_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:38:52.61 +07:54:39.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54484_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132
The candidate 54484_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54486_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132
The candidate 54486_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:37:18.53 +02:10:58.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54496_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132
The candidate 54496_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54498_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132
The candidate 54498_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:06:45.05 +01:57:44.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54499_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132
Preparing report for the candidate 54499_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54500_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132
The candidate 54500_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54501_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132
The candidate 54501_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54502_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132
The candidate 54502_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54503_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132
The candidate 54503_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54504_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132
The candidate 54504_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54506_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132
The candidate 54506_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54507_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132
The candidate 54507_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54509_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132
The candidate 54509_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54511_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132
The candidate 54511_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54513_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132
The candidate 54513_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54515_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132
Preparing report for the candidate 54515_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54516_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132
The candidate 54516_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54519_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132
The candidate 54519_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54520_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132
Preparing report for the candidate 54520_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54521_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132
The candidate 54521_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:36:34.82 +06:07:49.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54522_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132
The candidate 54522_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54523_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132
The candidate 54523_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:28:23.90 +09:24:27.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54526_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132
Preparing report for the candidate 54526_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54528_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132
The candidate 54528_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54529_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132
The candidate 54529_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54530_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132
The candidate 54530_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54535_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132
The candidate 54535_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54536_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132
The candidate 54536_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54537_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132
Preparing report for the candidate 54537_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54539_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132
The candidate 54539_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54541_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132
The candidate 54541_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:04:58.26 +07:22:10.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54543_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132
The candidate 54543_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:21:17.04 +06:01:26.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54544_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132
The candidate 54544_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54546_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132
The candidate 54546_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54548_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132
Preparing report for the candidate 54548_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54549_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132
The candidate 54549_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54550_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132
Preparing report for the candidate 54550_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54551_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132
The candidate 54551_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54552_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132
The candidate 54552_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54557_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132
Preparing report for the candidate 54557_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54562_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132
The candidate 54562_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54564_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132
The candidate 54564_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54568_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132
The candidate 54568_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54573_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132
The candidate 54573_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54574_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132
The candidate 54574_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54576_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132
The candidate 54576_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54577_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132
The candidate 54577_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54578_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132
The candidate 54578_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54580_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132
The candidate 54580_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54582_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132
The candidate 54582_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54584_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132
The candidate 54584_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54588_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132
The candidate 54588_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54589_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132
The candidate 54589_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54599_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132
The candidate 54599_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 16796_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132
The candidate 16796_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-03_00-49-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0132 did not pass the final checks
