This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-02_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223421_TTUQ2b1x1_2126974_QCkp6Kk9
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461163.6481,7.25,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260503.1481 7.25CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461163.6481,7.33,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260503.1481 7.33CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461163.6481,7.78,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260503.1481 7.78CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461163.6481,14.08,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260503.1481 14.08CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461163.6481,7.89,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260503.1481 7.89CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461163.6481,7.98,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260503.1481 7.98CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 03.1481 2461163.6481 13.29 07:05:02.56 +22:30:09.9
194.03862 12.90281 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 6.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.17 Thetis 0 -0 0 13.4 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:05:02.56 +22:30:09.9: 16.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:05:02.56 +22:30:09.9: 15.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461163.6481,13.29,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260503.1481 13.29CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 03.1481 2461163.6481 13.49 07:18:25.63 +18:08:45.8
199.44855 13.96781 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.0" and 6.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.34 Circe 1 1 2 13.9 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:18:25.63 +18:08:45.8: 16.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:18:25.63 +18:08:45.8: 16.13 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461163.6481,13.49,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260503.1481 13.49CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461163.6481,13.57,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260503.1481 13.57CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 03.1481 2461163.6481 13.69 07:24:01.39 +23:37:33.5
194.77227 17.35457 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.5" and 6.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.200 Dynamene 1 -1 1 13.8 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:24:01.39 +23:37:33.5: 16.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:24:01.39 +23:37:33.5: 16.23 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461163.6481,13.69,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260503.1481 13.69CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 03.1481 2461163.6481 14.19 07:31:54.57 +21:25:19.4
197.64499 18.18511 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 5.8" and 6.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.334 Chicago -0 5 5 14.6 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:31:54.57 +21:25:19.4: 16.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:31:54.57 +21:25:19.4: 16.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461163.6481,14.19,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260503.1481 14.19CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 03.1481 2461163.6481 13.90 07:25:59.00 +23:25:59.0
195.14002 17.69532 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 6.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.133 Cyrene 1 -1 1 14.2 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:25:59.00 +23:25:59.0: 16.13 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:25:59.00 +23:25:59.0: 16.19 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461163.6481,13.90,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260503.1481 13.90CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 03.1481 2461163.6481 13.89 07:27:21.08 +21:03:21.0
197.56441 17.06424 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.1" and 6.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.206 Hersilia 1 -0 1 14.4 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:27:21.08 +21:03:21.0: 16.19 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:27:21.08 +21:03:21.0: 16.23 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461163.6481,13.89,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260503.1481 13.89CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461163.6481,7.81,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260503.1481 7.81CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 03.1481 2461163.6481 11.84 07:34:53.94 +24:18:29.9
195.09289 19.91305 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 6.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.40 Harmonia -0 0 0 11.5 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:34:53.94 +24:18:29.9: 14.65 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:34:53.94 +24:18:29.9: 14.56 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.60 +/- 0.07
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461163.6481,11.84,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260503.1481 11.84CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.73760365 18.01.2026 05:41:58.955 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
First image: 2461058.73760365 18.01.2026 05:41:58.955 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Last image: 2461163.64845811 03.05.2026 03:33:36.781 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-02_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223421_TTUQ2b1x1_2126974_QCkp6Kk9/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 5
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.60
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 6 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 13204
Objects passed selection criteria: 13171
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 12597
Average stars matched: 11437.8 (90.7974 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 122664 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Apr 29 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-35-gf9552f12
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-29)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat May 2 22:37:15 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.73760365 18.01.2026 05:41:58.955 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
First image: 2461058.73760365 18.01.2026 05:41:58.955 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Last image: 2461163.64845811 03.05.2026 03:33:36.781 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-02_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223421_TTUQ2b1x1_2126974_QCkp6Kk9/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 120
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.28
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 45 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 91858
Objects passed selection criteria: 91678
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.2 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.2 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 90946
Average stars matched: 82786.8 (91.0285 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1897860 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Apr 29 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-35-gf9552f12
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-29)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat May 2 22:39:58 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-02_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223421_TTUQ2b1x1_2126974_QCkp6Kk9/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-32-43_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-02_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223421_TTUQ2b1x1_2126974_QCkp6Kk9/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-02_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223421_TTUQ2b1x1_2126974_QCkp6Kk9/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-32-43_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-02_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223421_TTUQ2b1x1_2126974_QCkp6Kk9/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461163.64784006
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
'asassn_transients_list.txt' -> '../asassn_transients_list.txt'
'tns_transients_list.txt' -> '../tns_transients_list.txt'
wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits'
wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits'
wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-32-43_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-32-43_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-32-43_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-32-43_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits'
wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:22:55.118 +21:59:39.20 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-32-43_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-32-43_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:18.869 +22:00:42.47 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:22:55.118 +21:59:39.20
Second-epoch image center 07:23:18.869 +22:00:42.47
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0934 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:16.129 +22:00:34.77 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:22:55.118 +21:59:39.20
Second-epoch image center 07:23:16.129 +22:00:34.77
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0826 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:23:18.869 +22:00:42.47
Second-epoch second image center 07:23:16.129 +22:00:34.77
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01080 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits &> /tmp/tmp.HvDABN102j
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits &> /tmp/tmp.EWoW2AQimp
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-02_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223421_TTUQ2b1x1_2126974_QCkp6Kk9/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-32-43_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits &> /tmp/tmp.qlE7msWOUq
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-02_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223421_TTUQ2b1x1_2126974_QCkp6Kk9/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-32-43_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-02_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223421_TTUQ2b1x1_2126974_QCkp6Kk9/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits &> /tmp/tmp.vrzliSqvAS
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-02_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223421_TTUQ2b1x1_2126974_QCkp6Kk9/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 22550 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 101.7556 to 119.3352 deg, Dec +16.3006 to +27.3458 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 101.7556 to 119.3352 deg, Dec 16.3006 to 27.3458 deg
Loaded 14532 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10648 out of 11733 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11733 out of 22550 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.897900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.897900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.60
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.30
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.30
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 22550 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 101.7556 to 119.3352 deg, Dec +16.3006 to +27.3458 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 101.7556 to 119.3352 deg, Dec 16.3006 to 27.3458 deg
Loaded 14532 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10648 out of 11733 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11733 out of 22550 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits (aperture=6.1)
Read 23656 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 102.0351 to 119.5904 deg, Dec +16.4807 to +27.2946 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 102.0351 to 119.5904 deg, Dec 16.4807 to 27.2946 deg
Loaded 13969 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10670 out of 11761 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11761 out of 23656 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 4 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
2.3 pix Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
2.6 pix fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-32-43_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits
2.6 pix fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
15.3 mag. Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-32-43_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.4 (SNR ) 11.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.HvDABN102j (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-02_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223421_TTUQ2b1x1_2126974_QCkp6Kk9/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2218, passed=22550
Got 22550 stars (including 20300 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 22550 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 954 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 941 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22225 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 954 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22223 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22223 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 953 stars left (next iteration limit 1048)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits -region wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.EWoW2AQimp (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-02_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223421_TTUQ2b1x1_2126974_QCkp6Kk9/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2265, passed=23656
Got 23656 stars (including 21362 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 23656 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 951 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 930 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22858 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 952 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22858 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22858 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 949 stars left (next iteration limit 1045)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits -region wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.qlE7msWOUq (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-02_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223421_TTUQ2b1x1_2126974_QCkp6Kk9/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-02_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223421_TTUQ2b1x1_2126974_QCkp6Kk9/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-32-43_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-02_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223421_TTUQ2b1x1_2126974_QCkp6Kk9/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-32-43_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-02_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223421_TTUQ2b1x1_2126974_QCkp6Kk9/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-32-43_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-02_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223421_TTUQ2b1x1_2126974_QCkp6Kk9/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-32-43_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-02_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223421_TTUQ2b1x1_2126974_QCkp6Kk9/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-32-43_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-02_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223421_TTUQ2b1x1_2126974_QCkp6Kk9/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-32-43_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-32-43_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-32-43_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-32-43_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-32-43_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-32-43_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-32-43_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-32-43_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-02_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223421_TTUQ2b1x1_2126974_QCkp6Kk9/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-32-43_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-32-43_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=851, passed=11602
Got 11602 stars (including 10738 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-32-43_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11602 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 925 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.62"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11403 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.65"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11401 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.65"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11401 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.73"
Excluding outliers - 943 stars left (next iteration limit 1037)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-32-43_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-32-43_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-02_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223421_TTUQ2b1x1_2126974_QCkp6Kk9/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-32-43_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-32-43_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-32-43_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.vrzliSqvAS (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-02_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223421_TTUQ2b1x1_2126974_QCkp6Kk9/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-02_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223421_TTUQ2b1x1_2126974_QCkp6Kk9/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-02_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223421_TTUQ2b1x1_2126974_QCkp6Kk9/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-02_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223421_TTUQ2b1x1_2126974_QCkp6Kk9/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-02_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223421_TTUQ2b1x1_2126974_QCkp6Kk9/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-02_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223421_TTUQ2b1x1_2126974_QCkp6Kk9/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-02_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223421_TTUQ2b1x1_2126974_QCkp6Kk9/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-02_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223421_TTUQ2b1x1_2126974_QCkp6Kk9/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=853, passed=11542
Got 11542 stars (including 10679 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11542 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 938 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 923 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.63"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11390 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.67"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 938 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11390 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.67"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11391 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.74"
Excluding outliers - 937 stars left (next iteration limit 1030)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-02_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223421_TTUQ2b1x1_2126974_QCkp6Kk9/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-32-43_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-32-43_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-02_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223421_TTUQ2b1x1_2126974_QCkp6Kk9/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-32-43_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-02_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223421_TTUQ2b1x1_2126974_QCkp6Kk9/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 3s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34569_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066
Preparing report for the candidate 34569_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34570_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066
Preparing report for the candidate 34570_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34571_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066
Preparing report for the candidate 34571_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30957_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066
The candidate 30957_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:43:02.35 +23:26:56.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 6s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Gem-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-02_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223421_TTUQ2b1x1_2126974_QCkp6Kk9/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-32-43_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-02_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223421_TTUQ2b1x1_2126974_QCkp6Kk9/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-02_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223421_TTUQ2b1x1_2126974_QCkp6Kk9/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-32-43_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-02_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223421_TTUQ2b1x1_2126974_QCkp6Kk9/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-32-43_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-32-43_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:22:55.118 +21:59:39.20 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-32-43_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-32-43_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:18.869 +22:00:42.47 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:22:55.118 +21:59:39.20
Second-epoch image center 07:23:18.869 +22:00:42.47
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0934 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:16.129 +22:00:34.77 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:22:55.118 +21:59:39.20
Second-epoch image center 07:23:16.129 +22:00:34.77
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0826 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:23:18.869 +22:00:42.47
Second-epoch second image center 07:23:16.129 +22:00:34.77
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01080 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits &> /tmp/tmp.KVtVfaUulG
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits &> /tmp/tmp.41NssKzEgT
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-02_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223421_TTUQ2b1x1_2126974_QCkp6Kk9/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-32-43_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits &> /tmp/tmp.r6te83P28Y
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-02_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223421_TTUQ2b1x1_2126974_QCkp6Kk9/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-32-43_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-02_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223421_TTUQ2b1x1_2126974_QCkp6Kk9/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits &> /tmp/tmp.3GKoqQ8YGE
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-02_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223421_TTUQ2b1x1_2126974_QCkp6Kk9/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 153680 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 101.7461 to 119.3352 deg, Dec +16.3007 to +27.3487 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 101.7461 to 119.3352 deg, Dec 16.3007 to 27.3487 deg
Loaded 14554 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8811 out of 12036 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12036 out of 153680 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.757100
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.757100
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.28
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.48
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.48
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 153680 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 101.7461 to 119.3352 deg, Dec +16.3007 to +27.3487 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 101.7461 to 119.3352 deg, Dec 16.3007 to 27.3487 deg
Loaded 14554 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8811 out of 12036 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12036 out of 153680 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits (aperture=4.6)
Read 151496 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 102.0337 to 119.6237 deg, Dec +16.4751 to +27.2973 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 102.0337 to 119.6237 deg, Dec 16.4751 to 27.2973 deg
Loaded 14001 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8799 out of 12010 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12010 out of 151496 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits (aperture=4.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 98 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
2.1 pix Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
2.3 pix fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-32-43_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits
2.3 pix fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits
1.9 pix wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
15.5 mag. Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-32-43_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.6 (SNR ) 14.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.KVtVfaUulG (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-02_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223421_TTUQ2b1x1_2126974_QCkp6Kk9/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=36, blended=17863, passed=153644
Got 153644 stars (including 135507 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 153644 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 941 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 151041 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 151042 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 151042 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 953 stars left (next iteration limit 1048)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits -region wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.41NssKzEgT (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-02_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223421_TTUQ2b1x1_2126974_QCkp6Kk9/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=23, blended=17705, passed=151473
Got 151473 stars (including 133510 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 151473 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 954 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 937 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 148383 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 954 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 148381 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 148382 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 953 stars left (next iteration limit 1049)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits -region wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.r6te83P28Y (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-02_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223421_TTUQ2b1x1_2126974_QCkp6Kk9/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-02_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223421_TTUQ2b1x1_2126974_QCkp6Kk9/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-32-43_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-02_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223421_TTUQ2b1x1_2126974_QCkp6Kk9/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-32-43_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-02_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223421_TTUQ2b1x1_2126974_QCkp6Kk9/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-32-43_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-02_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223421_TTUQ2b1x1_2126974_QCkp6Kk9/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-32-43_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-02_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223421_TTUQ2b1x1_2126974_QCkp6Kk9/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-32-43_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-02_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223421_TTUQ2b1x1_2126974_QCkp6Kk9/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-32-43_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-32-43_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-32-43_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-32-43_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-32-43_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-32-43_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-32-43_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-32-43_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-02_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223421_TTUQ2b1x1_2126974_QCkp6Kk9/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-32-43_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-32-43_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=18, blended=5768, passed=77328
Got 77328 stars (including 71480 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-32-43_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 77328 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 926 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 75647 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 75643 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 75643 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.65"
Excluding outliers - 941 stars left (next iteration limit 1035)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-32-43_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-32-43_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-02_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223421_TTUQ2b1x1_2126974_QCkp6Kk9/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-32-43_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-32-43_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-32-43_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.3GKoqQ8YGE (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-02_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223421_TTUQ2b1x1_2126974_QCkp6Kk9/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-02_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223421_TTUQ2b1x1_2126974_QCkp6Kk9/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-02_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223421_TTUQ2b1x1_2126974_QCkp6Kk9/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-02_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223421_TTUQ2b1x1_2126974_QCkp6Kk9/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-02_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223421_TTUQ2b1x1_2126974_QCkp6Kk9/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-02_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223421_TTUQ2b1x1_2126974_QCkp6Kk9/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-02_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223421_TTUQ2b1x1_2126974_QCkp6Kk9/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-02_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223421_TTUQ2b1x1_2126974_QCkp6Kk9/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=24, blended=5523, passed=76896
Got 76896 stars (including 71286 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 76896 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 922 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 75152 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 75148 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 75150 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.65"
Excluding outliers - 940 stars left (next iteration limit 1035)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-02_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223421_TTUQ2b1x1_2126974_QCkp6Kk9/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-32-43_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-02_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223421_TTUQ2b1x1_2126974_QCkp6Kk9/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-32-43_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-02_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223421_TTUQ2b1x1_2126974_QCkp6Kk9/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:30:18.84 +18:26:51.5: 13.48 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:22:37.84 +19:41:14.2: 13.55 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:31:40.21 +19:52:28.0: 14.20 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:19:34.97 +22:19:33.3: 13.47 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:21:22.32 +19:43:07.5: 14.47 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:36:44.92 +21:03:12.3: 13.29 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:30:18.84 +18:26:51.5: 13.49 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:31:40.21 +19:52:28.0: 14.25 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.49 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:30:18.84 +18:26:51.5: ref_mag=13.49 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.5463 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:22:37.84 +19:41:14.2: 13.60 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.23 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:31:40.21 +19:52:28.0: ref_mag=14.23 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.2509 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:21:22.32 +19:43:07.5: 14.37 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.57 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:22:37.84 +19:41:14.2: ref_mag=13.57 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.8720 delta=-0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.41 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:21:22.32 +19:43:07.5: ref_mag=14.41 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.5108 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:19:34.97 +22:19:33.3: 13.39 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.41 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:19:34.97 +22:19:33.3: ref_mag=13.41 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.6561 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:36:44.92 +21:03:12.3: 13.33 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.31 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:36:44.92 +21:03:12.3: ref_mag=13.31 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2640 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:35:31.36 +22:07:20.0: 12.79 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:05:02.56 +22:30:09.9: 16.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:35:31.36 +22:07:20.0: 12.71 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:30:04.23 +18:36:01.7: 13.25 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.74 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:35:31.36 +22:07:20.0: ref_mag=12.74 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.9834 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:18:25.63 +18:08:45.8: 16.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:30:04.23 +18:36:01.7: 13.32 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.28 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:30:04.23 +18:36:01.7: ref_mag=13.28 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3855 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:05:02.56 +22:30:09.9: 15.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:18:25.63 +18:08:45.8: 16.13 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:34:25.75 +18:02:23.4: 13.35 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:07:31.55 +24:54:41.3: 13.51 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:34:25.75 +18:02:23.4: 13.55 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.44 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:34:25.75 +18:02:23.4: ref_mag=13.44 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6340 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:07:31.55 +24:54:41.3: 13.50 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.50 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:07:31.55 +24:54:41.3: ref_mag=13.50 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5750 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:30:24.18 +25:25:48.1: 13.85 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:24:01.39 +23:37:33.5: 16.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:30:24.18 +25:25:48.1: 13.76 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.80 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:30:24.18 +25:25:48.1: ref_mag=13.80 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7105 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:19:40.17 +21:05:52.9: 13.51 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:34:29.16 +25:13:51.2: 14.04 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:24:01.39 +23:37:33.5: 16.23 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:19:40.17 +21:05:52.9: 13.70 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.59 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:19:40.17 +21:05:52.9: ref_mag=13.59 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8516 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:34:29.16 +25:13:51.2: 14.06 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.05 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:34:29.16 +25:13:51.2: ref_mag=14.05 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.9339 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:31:54.57 +21:25:19.4: 16.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:10:03.50 +20:20:37.6: 13.52 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:31:54.57 +21:25:19.4: 16.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:25:54.46 +22:07:17.3: 13.85 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:13:12.13 +26:11:49.5: 13.96 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:10:03.50 +20:20:37.6: 13.55 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.54 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:10:03.50 +20:20:37.6: ref_mag=13.54 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8410 delta=-0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:25:54.46 +22:07:17.3: 13.65 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.73 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:25:54.46 +22:07:17.3: ref_mag=13.73 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7458 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:25:59.00 +23:25:59.0: 16.13 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:13:12.13 +26:11:49.5: 13.86 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.90 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:13:12.13 +26:11:49.5: ref_mag=13.90 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9321 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:25:59.00 +23:25:59.0: 16.19 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:42:10.03 +20:25:04.0: 13.84 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:27:21.08 +21:03:21.0: 16.19 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:42:10.03 +20:25:04.0: 13.90 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.87 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:42:10.03 +20:25:04.0: ref_mag=13.87 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9455 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:31:02.59 +20:48:55.9: 13.96 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:27:21.08 +21:03:21.0: 16.23 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:31:02.59 +20:48:55.9: 13.95 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.96 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:18:39.13 +25:35:47.2: 13.86 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:31:02.59 +20:48:55.9: ref_mag=13.96 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9785 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:18:39.13 +25:35:47.2: 14.03 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.93 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:18:39.13 +25:35:47.2: ref_mag=13.93 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.1359 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:18:59.91 +20:18:51.5: 14.10 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:18:59.91 +20:18:51.5: 14.29 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.19 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:18:59.91 +20:18:51.5: ref_mag=14.19 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.1210 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:31:51.90 +22:08:59.6: 14.41 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:15:08.14 +21:35:22.1: 16.17 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:31:51.90 +22:08:59.6: 14.36 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.38 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:31:51.90 +22:08:59.6: ref_mag=14.38 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.2480 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:15:08.14 +21:35:22.1: 16.21 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:13:08.64 +24:38:30.4: 14.15 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:13:08.64 +24:38:30.4: 14.27 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.20 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:13:08.64 +24:38:30.4: ref_mag=14.20 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.3619 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:19:28.28 +23:53:15.6: 14.58 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:19:28.28 +23:53:15.6: 14.77 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.66 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:19:28.28 +23:53:15.6: ref_mag=14.66 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.4343 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:34:53.94 +24:18:29.9: 14.65 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:34:53.94 +24:18:29.9: 14.56 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.60 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 07:34:53.94 +24:18:29.9: ref_mag=14.60 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=11.8414 delta=2.76 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out196058.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out139991.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out195740.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out195753.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out195866.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out195889.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out195922.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out195958.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 17s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 9s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195460_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066
The candidate 195460_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195462_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066
The candidate 195462_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195483_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066
Preparing report for the candidate 195483_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195485_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066
The candidate 195485_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:38:11.08 +20:05:25.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195487_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066
The candidate 195487_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:40:05.03 +24:18:45.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195488_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066
The candidate 195488_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:18:22.83 +17:52:05.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195490_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066
The candidate 195490_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195499_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066
The candidate 195499_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195502_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066
The candidate 195502_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:08:21.07 +18:46:53.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195505_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066
The candidate 195505_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195506_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066
The candidate 195506_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:26.47 +25:01:10.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195510_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066
The candidate 195510_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:34:37.63 +19:32:48.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195511_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066
The candidate 195511_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195517_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066
The candidate 195517_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:00.07 +19:41:41.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195518_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066
The candidate 195518_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:32.99 +24:41:32.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195524_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066
Preparing report for the candidate 195524_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195525_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066
Preparing report for the candidate 195525_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195591_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066
The candidate 195591_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:19.25 +24:07:15.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195597_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066
The candidate 195597_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:25.13 +22:38:50.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195648_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066
The candidate 195648_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:25.36 +25:56:20.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195655_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066
The candidate 195655_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:27:42.15 +22:10:16.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195657_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066
The candidate 195657_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:32:08.83 +23:56:51.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195658_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066
The candidate 195658_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:42.50 +21:18:41.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195669_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066
The candidate 195669_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:11:55.62 +22:17:42.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195680_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066
The candidate 195680_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195690_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066
The candidate 195690_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:50.86 +18:51:18.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195702_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066
The candidate 195702_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:14.89 +20:00:15.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195706_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066
The candidate 195706_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:15.37 +21:47:42.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195712_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066
The candidate 195712_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:31:54.36 +24:32:03.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195719_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066
The candidate 195719_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:29:20.39 +24:26:17.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195726_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066
The candidate 195726_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:55.47 +21:31:09.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195732_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066
The candidate 195732_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:38:19.60 +21:35:20.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195733_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066
The candidate 195733_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:20:30.44 +20:05:39.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195735_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066
The candidate 195735_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:11:03.02 +18:51:18.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195737_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066
The candidate 195737_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195740_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066
Preparing report for the candidate 195740_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195751_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066
The candidate 195751_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:15.50 +24:11:34.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195752_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066
The candidate 195752_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:16:10.94 +24:39:06.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195753_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066
Preparing report for the candidate 195753_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195756_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066
The candidate 195756_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:27.74 +22:58:42.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195759_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066
The candidate 195759_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:14:40.72 +20:31:56.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195761_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066
The candidate 195761_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:25:02.76 +19:56:33.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195768_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066
The candidate 195768_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:22.48 +20:30:18.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195779_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066
The candidate 195779_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:23:41.22 +21:33:52.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195785_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066
The candidate 195785_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:41:33.11 +18:14:36.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195790_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066
Preparing report for the candidate 195790_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195793_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066
The candidate 195793_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:19:45.59 +20:26:51.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195801_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066
The candidate 195801_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:18:50.48 +25:56:36.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195808_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066
The candidate 195808_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:20.18 +24:08:07.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195810_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066
The candidate 195810_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195820_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066
The candidate 195820_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195826_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066
The candidate 195826_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:22.93 +18:10:09.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195827_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066
The candidate 195827_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:22:30.29 +22:57:31.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195828_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066
The candidate 195828_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:11.02 +20:06:30.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195830_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066
The candidate 195830_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:36:41.61 +20:16:51.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195837_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066
The candidate 195837_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:09.73 +19:03:37.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195838_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066
The candidate 195838_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:08:37.92 +20:47:56.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195839_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066
The candidate 195839_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:26.59 +21:00:06.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195842_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066
The candidate 195842_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:27:31.14 +19:26:16.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195845_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066
The candidate 195845_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:35.84 +24:19:32.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195848_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066
The candidate 195848_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:15:41.08 +22:08:54.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195855_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066
The candidate 195855_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195858_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066
The candidate 195858_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:27:24.64 +19:09:58.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195862_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066
The candidate 195862_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:10:01.67 +21:27:58.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195866_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066
Preparing report for the candidate 195866_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195876_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066
The candidate 195876_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195879_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066
The candidate 195879_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:10:22.62 +20:00:47.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195881_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066
The candidate 195881_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195882_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066
The candidate 195882_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:11:33.73 +22:39:40.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195883_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066
The candidate 195883_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:15.59 +25:49:10.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195889_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066
Preparing report for the candidate 195889_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195890_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066
The candidate 195890_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:27:03.72 +20:16:02.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195891_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066
The candidate 195891_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:19:55.78 +20:49:17.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195894_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066
The candidate 195894_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195902_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066
The candidate 195902_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195911_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066
The candidate 195911_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:31:02.55 +25:10:29.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195914_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066
The candidate 195914_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195916_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066
The candidate 195916_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:30:28.09 +25:27:43.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195922_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066
Preparing report for the candidate 195922_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195923_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066
The candidate 195923_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:31:29.94 +22:53:11.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195928_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066
The candidate 195928_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:28:38.92 +24:17:02.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195938_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066
The candidate 195938_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:23:19.28 +20:37:09.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195939_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066
The candidate 195939_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195947_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066
The candidate 195947_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:40.70 +21:21:31.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195958_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066
Preparing report for the candidate 195958_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195959_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066
The candidate 195959_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:22.34 +21:13:56.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195980_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066
The candidate 195980_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195994_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066
The candidate 195994_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:24:29.44 +18:53:45.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196017_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066
The candidate 196017_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196031_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066
The candidate 196031_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196035_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066
The candidate 196035_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:11:36.14 +18:11:04.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196045_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066
The candidate 196045_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196058_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066
The candidate 196058_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:15:08.14 +21:35:22.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.36, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.34)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.986 3367162379046057984 108.78332763474 +21.58953744484 14.0206 12.0632 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.986#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196107_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066
The candidate 196107_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196121_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066
The candidate 196121_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181612_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066
Preparing report for the candidate 181612_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 165521_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066
The candidate 165521_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_22-33-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066 did not pass the final checks
