This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-02_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_223025_TTUQ1b1x1_1866650_RpvX83dg
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 03.1453 2461163.6453 8.95 04:45:42.27 +75:06:02.2
136.32757 18.74239 galactic Cam Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 1.6 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" X Cam
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
7.100 V 14.300 V 2444679.00000 143.560000000000 K8-M8e
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 04:45:42.27 +75:06:02.2: 15.70 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 04:45:42.27 +75:06:02.2: 15.67 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
X Cam,2461163.6453,8.95,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
X Cam 20260503.1453 8.95CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 03.1453 2461163.6453 14.05 04:04:23.92 +75:00:42.5
134.55071 16.68898 galactic Cam Second-epoch detections are separated by 8.7" and 3.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 04:04:23.92 +75:00:42.5 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 04:04:23.92 +75:00:42.5: 15.63 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 04:04:23.92 +75:00:42.5: 15.66 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461163.6453,14.05,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260503.1453 14.05CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 03.1453 2461163.6453 11.46 05:37:28.72 +67:25:34.9
145.46868 18.22220 galactic Cam Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.6" and 2.6 pix
The object was found in VSX 3" KN Cam
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
10.700 V 14.800 V 289.000000000000 M7/8
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 05:37:28.72 +67:25:34.9: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 05:37:28.72 +67:25:34.9: 15.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
KN Cam,2461163.6453,11.46,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
KN Cam 20260503.1453 11.46CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461082.77180627 11.02.2026 06:31:14.062 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
First image: 2461082.77180627 11.02.2026 06:31:14.062 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
Last image: 2461163.64560670 03.05.2026 03:29:30.419 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-02_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_223025_TTUQ1b1x1_1866650_RpvX83dg/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 6
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.63
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 6 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 14205
Objects passed selection criteria: 14163
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 11170
Average stars matched: 10857.8 (97.2046 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 119156 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Apr 29 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-35-gf9552f12
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-29)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat May 2 22:32:54 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461082.77180627 11.02.2026 06:31:14.062 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
First image: 2461082.77180627 11.02.2026 06:31:14.062 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
Last image: 2461163.64560670 03.05.2026 03:29:30.419 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-02_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_223025_TTUQ1b1x1_1866650_RpvX83dg/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 129
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.31
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 38 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 99867
Objects passed selection criteria: 99629
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 82902.5
Average stars matched: 79731.2 (96.1747 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1876336 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Apr 29 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-35-gf9552f12
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-29)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat May 2 22:35:50 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-02_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_223025_TTUQ1b1x1_1866650_RpvX83dg/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-28-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-02_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_223025_TTUQ1b1x1_1866650_RpvX83dg/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-02_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_223025_TTUQ1b1x1_1866650_RpvX83dg/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-28-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-02_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_223025_TTUQ1b1x1_1866650_RpvX83dg/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461163.64491221
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits'
wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits'
wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-28-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-28-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-28-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-28-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits'
wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
Image size: 931.3'x615.5' 15.5(deg)x10.3(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.84"/pix along the X axis and 5.78"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:47:40.089 +70:00:51.04 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.84"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.8" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-28-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-28-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits
Image size: 941.9'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:48:12.113 +70:00:45.80 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:47:40.089 +70:00:51.04
Second-epoch image center 04:48:12.113 +70:00:45.80
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0456 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046.fits
Image size: 941.9'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:48:14.580 +70:00:46.10 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:47:40.089 +70:00:51.04
Second-epoch image center 04:48:14.580 +70:00:46.10
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0491 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 04:48:12.113 +70:00:45.80
Second-epoch second image center 04:48:14.580 +70:00:46.10
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00351 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits &> /tmp/tmp.OKiqk6KQEu
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits &> /tmp/tmp.8HWzvkyGUW
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-02_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_223025_TTUQ1b1x1_1866650_RpvX83dg/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-28-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits &> /tmp/tmp.1GMRqx16Gg
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-02_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_223025_TTUQ1b1x1_1866650_RpvX83dg/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-28-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-02_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_223025_TTUQ1b1x1_1866650_RpvX83dg/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ztDL67HQlv
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-02_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_223025_TTUQ1b1x1_1866650_RpvX83dg/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits and wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits and wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits and wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 14898 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 44.4976 to 99.7245 deg, Dec +63.0575 to +75.4625 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 44.4976 to 99.7245 deg, Dec 63.0575 to 75.4625 deg
Loaded 13922 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 27 out of 37 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 37 out of 14898 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.850900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.850900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.63
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.22
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.22
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 14898 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 44.4976 to 99.7245 deg, Dec +63.0575 to +75.4625 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 44.4976 to 99.7245 deg, Dec 63.0575 to 75.4625 deg
Loaded 13922 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 27 out of 37 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 37 out of 14898 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits (aperture=6.1)
Read 14971 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 44.8025 to 99.7224 deg, Dec +63.0579 to +75.4657 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 44.8025 to 99.7224 deg, Dec 63.0579 to 75.4657 deg
Loaded 13849 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 25 out of 34 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 34 out of 14971 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits (aperture=6.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 3 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
2.1 pix Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
2.3 pix fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-28-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits
2.3 pix fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
15.2 mag. Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
14.3 mag. fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-28-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits
14.3 mag. fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.3 (SNR ) 11.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.OKiqk6KQEu (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-02_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_223025_TTUQ1b1x1_1866650_RpvX83dg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1217, passed=14898
Got 14898 stars (including 13659 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14898 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 931.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 931.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.012935 (46.6 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010348 (37.3 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 765 to 829 (Dec 63.1 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 287 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 232 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 181 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 6.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 225 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3429 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 6.14"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 765 to 829 (Dec 63.1 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 344 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 312 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3468 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 6.08"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 312 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4859 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 6.22"
Excluding outliers - 312 stars left (next iteration limit 247)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits -region wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.8HWzvkyGUW (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-02_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_223025_TTUQ1b1x1_1866650_RpvX83dg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1204, passed=14971
Got 14971 stars (including 13753 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14971 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 931.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 931.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.012933 (46.6 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010347 (37.2 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 765 to 829 (Dec 63.1 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 280 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 218 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 169 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 6.54"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 214 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3304 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 6.01"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 765 to 829 (Dec 63.1 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 339 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 303 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3342 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 5.96"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 303 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4810 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 5.90"
Excluding outliers - 303 stars left (next iteration limit 235)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits -region wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.1GMRqx16Gg (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-02_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_223025_TTUQ1b1x1_1866650_RpvX83dg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-02_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_223025_TTUQ1b1x1_1866650_RpvX83dg/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-28-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-02_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_223025_TTUQ1b1x1_1866650_RpvX83dg/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-28-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-02_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_223025_TTUQ1b1x1_1866650_RpvX83dg/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-28-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-02_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_223025_TTUQ1b1x1_1866650_RpvX83dg/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-28-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-02_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_223025_TTUQ1b1x1_1866650_RpvX83dg/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-28-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-02_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_223025_TTUQ1b1x1_1866650_RpvX83dg/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-28-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-28-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-28-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-28-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-28-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-28-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-28-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-28-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-02_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_223025_TTUQ1b1x1_1866650_RpvX83dg/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-28-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-28-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=580, passed=7579
Got 7579 stars (including 6993 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-28-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7579 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013082 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010466 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 766 to 828 (Dec 63.4 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 952 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7372 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 766 to 828 (Dec 63.4 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7371 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7371 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 967 stars left (next iteration limit 1063)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-28-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-28-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-02_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_223025_TTUQ1b1x1_1866650_RpvX83dg/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-28-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-28-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-28-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ztDL67HQlv (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-02_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_223025_TTUQ1b1x1_1866650_RpvX83dg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-02_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_223025_TTUQ1b1x1_1866650_RpvX83dg/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-02_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_223025_TTUQ1b1x1_1866650_RpvX83dg/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-02_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_223025_TTUQ1b1x1_1866650_RpvX83dg/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-02_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_223025_TTUQ1b1x1_1866650_RpvX83dg/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-02_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_223025_TTUQ1b1x1_1866650_RpvX83dg/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-02_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_223025_TTUQ1b1x1_1866650_RpvX83dg/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-02_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_223025_TTUQ1b1x1_1866650_RpvX83dg/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=596, passed=7478
Got 7478 stars (including 6876 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7478 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013082 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010466 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 766 to 828 (Dec 63.4 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 951 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7248 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 766 to 828 (Dec 63.4 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7247 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7247 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 968 stars left (next iteration limit 1064)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-02_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_223025_TTUQ1b1x1_1866650_RpvX83dg/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-28-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-28-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-02_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_223025_TTUQ1b1x1_1866650_RpvX83dg/wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-28-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-02_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_223025_TTUQ1b1x1_1866650_RpvX83dg/wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cam-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 05:37:28.75 +67:25:34.4: 15.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 04:45:42.27 +75:06:02.2: 15.70 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 05:37:28.75 +67:25:34.4: 15.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 04:45:42.27 +75:06:02.2: 15.67 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out21110.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out00325.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 5s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21110_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046
The candidate 21110_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:28.75 +67:25:34.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=11.24, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=12.22)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.737 481610114722851328 084.37153096417 +67.42585841135 9.5898 8.0255 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.737#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.8#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21126_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046
The candidate 21126_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:18:00.35 +71:13:53.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 00325_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046
Preparing report for the candidate 00325_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 6s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cam-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
04:45:42.27 +75:06:02.2
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-02_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_223025_TTUQ1b1x1_1866650_RpvX83dg/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-28-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-02_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_223025_TTUQ1b1x1_1866650_RpvX83dg/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-02_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_223025_TTUQ1b1x1_1866650_RpvX83dg/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-28-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-02_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_223025_TTUQ1b1x1_1866650_RpvX83dg/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-28-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-28-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
Image size: 931.3'x615.5' 15.5(deg)x10.3(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.84"/pix along the X axis and 5.78"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:47:40.089 +70:00:51.04 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.84"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.8" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-28-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-28-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits
Image size: 941.9'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:48:12.113 +70:00:45.80 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:47:40.089 +70:00:51.04
Second-epoch image center 04:48:12.113 +70:00:45.80
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0456 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046.fits
Image size: 941.9'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:48:14.580 +70:00:46.10 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:47:40.089 +70:00:51.04
Second-epoch image center 04:48:14.580 +70:00:46.10
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0491 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 04:48:12.113 +70:00:45.80
Second-epoch second image center 04:48:14.580 +70:00:46.10
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00351 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits &> /tmp/tmp.oqP6fA9FJk
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ppxGwE3vcy
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-02_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_223025_TTUQ1b1x1_1866650_RpvX83dg/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-28-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ZcpEiwLMe9
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-02_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_223025_TTUQ1b1x1_1866650_RpvX83dg/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-28-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-02_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_223025_TTUQ1b1x1_1866650_RpvX83dg/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046.fits &> /tmp/tmp.zp6xujRwhV
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-02_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_223025_TTUQ1b1x1_1866650_RpvX83dg/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits and wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits and wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits and wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 107757 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 44.4945 to 99.7245 deg, Dec +63.0040 to +75.4780 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 44.4945 to 99.7245 deg, Dec 63.0040 to 75.4780 deg
Loaded 14035 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 37 out of 59 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 59 out of 107757 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.614600
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.614600
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.31
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.30
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.30
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 107757 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 44.4945 to 99.7245 deg, Dec +63.0040 to +75.4780 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 44.4945 to 99.7245 deg, Dec 63.0040 to 75.4780 deg
Loaded 14035 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 37 out of 59 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 59 out of 107757 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits (aperture=4.6)
Read 108260 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 44.4942 to 99.8836 deg, Dec +63.0104 to +75.4891 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 44.4942 to 99.8836 deg, Dec 63.0104 to 75.4891 deg
Loaded 14072 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 37 out of 57 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 57 out of 108260 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits (aperture=4.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 120 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
1.9 pix Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
2.0 pix fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-28-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits
2.0 pix fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046.fits
1.9 pix wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
1.9 pix wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
15.3 mag. Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-28-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.4 (SNR ) 13.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.oqP6fA9FJk (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-02_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_223025_TTUQ1b1x1_1866650_RpvX83dg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=48, blended=8978, passed=107709
Got 107709 stars (including 98551 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 107709 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 931.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 931.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.012935 (46.6 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010348 (37.3 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 765 to 829 (Dec 63.0 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 296 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 243 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 194 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 6.73"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 236 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 21272 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 6.21"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 63.0 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 348 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 320 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 21308 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 6.20"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 319 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32121 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 5.81"
Excluding outliers - 319 stars left (next iteration limit 259)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits -region wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ppxGwE3vcy (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-02_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_223025_TTUQ1b1x1_1866650_RpvX83dg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=30, blended=8926, passed=108230
Got 108230 stars (including 99122 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 108230 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 931.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 931.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.012933 (46.6 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010347 (37.2 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 765 to 829 (Dec 63.0 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 293 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 240 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 187 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 6.07"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 233 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20932 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 5.99"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 765 to 829 (Dec 63.0 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 350 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 317 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20968 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 5.96"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 317 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30524 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 5.71"
Excluding outliers - 317 stars left (next iteration limit 256)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits -region wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ZcpEiwLMe9 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-02_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_223025_TTUQ1b1x1_1866650_RpvX83dg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-02_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_223025_TTUQ1b1x1_1866650_RpvX83dg/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-28-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-02_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_223025_TTUQ1b1x1_1866650_RpvX83dg/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-28-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-02_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_223025_TTUQ1b1x1_1866650_RpvX83dg/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-28-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-02_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_223025_TTUQ1b1x1_1866650_RpvX83dg/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-28-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-02_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_223025_TTUQ1b1x1_1866650_RpvX83dg/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-28-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-02_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_223025_TTUQ1b1x1_1866650_RpvX83dg/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-28-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-28-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-28-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-28-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-28-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-28-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-28-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-28-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-02_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_223025_TTUQ1b1x1_1866650_RpvX83dg/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-28-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-28-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=19, blended=3383, passed=59126
Got 59126 stars (including 55653 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-28-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 59126 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013082 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010466 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 766 to 828 (Dec 63.3 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 956 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 57818 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 766 to 828 (Dec 63.3 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 57817 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 57817 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 969 stars left (next iteration limit 1065)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-28-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-28-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-02_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_223025_TTUQ1b1x1_1866650_RpvX83dg/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-28-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-28-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-28-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.zp6xujRwhV (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-02_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_223025_TTUQ1b1x1_1866650_RpvX83dg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-02_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_223025_TTUQ1b1x1_1866650_RpvX83dg/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-02_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_223025_TTUQ1b1x1_1866650_RpvX83dg/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-02_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_223025_TTUQ1b1x1_1866650_RpvX83dg/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-02_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_223025_TTUQ1b1x1_1866650_RpvX83dg/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-02_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_223025_TTUQ1b1x1_1866650_RpvX83dg/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-02_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_223025_TTUQ1b1x1_1866650_RpvX83dg/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-02_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_223025_TTUQ1b1x1_1866650_RpvX83dg/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=19, blended=3741, passed=59135
Got 59135 stars (including 55308 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 59135 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013082 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010466 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 766 to 828 (Dec 63.3 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 950 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 57608 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 766 to 828 (Dec 63.3 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 57611 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 57612 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 967 stars left (next iteration limit 1063)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-02_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_223025_TTUQ1b1x1_1866650_RpvX83dg/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-28-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-02_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_223025_TTUQ1b1x1_1866650_RpvX83dg/wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-28-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-02_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_223025_TTUQ1b1x1_1866650_RpvX83dg/wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cam-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 06:05:13.26 +66:30:50.5: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 06:05:13.26 +66:30:50.5: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:05:13.26 +66:30:50.5: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 04:44:44.96 +66:38:52.3: 15.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 04:24:47.43 +68:41:54.0: 15.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 03:48:09.73 +67:47:21.1: 13.75 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 03:55:19.01 +69:26:17.6: 15.11 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 06:30:55.90 +71:39:25.0: 15.68 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 05:05:02.13 +73:26:20.7: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 04:37:22.06 +67:03:55.1: 15.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 04:22:13.45 +68:38:28.0: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 03:45:58.54 +68:00:23.0: 12.92 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 04:44:44.96 +66:38:52.3: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 04:24:47.43 +68:41:54.0: 15.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 03:48:09.73 +67:47:21.1: 13.59 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 03:55:19.01 +69:26:17.6: 15.02 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.66 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.06 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:48:09.73 +67:47:21.1: ref_mag=13.66 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7215 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 03:55:19.01 +69:26:17.6: ref_mag=15.06 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.6099 delta=1.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 05:05:02.13 +73:26:20.7: 15.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 04:22:13.45 +68:38:28.0: 15.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 04:37:22.06 +67:03:55.1: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 03:45:58.54 +68:00:23.0: 12.84 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 06:30:55.90 +71:39:25.0: 15.64 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.88 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:45:58.54 +68:00:23.0: ref_mag=12.88 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.5725 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 04:36:19.33 +70:49:12.2: 15.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 04:36:19.33 +70:49:12.2: 15.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 04:40:19.87 +66:10:22.6: 14.49 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 04:40:19.87 +66:10:22.6: 14.57 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.53 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 04:40:19.87 +66:10:22.6: ref_mag=14.53 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=11.7060 delta=2.83 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 04:15:46.63 +74:24:32.9: 15.25 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 04:15:46.63 +74:24:32.9: 15.22 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.24 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 04:15:46.63 +74:24:32.9: ref_mag=15.24 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=12.7121 delta=2.53 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 04:18:40.75 +74:39:11.9: 15.64 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 04:18:40.75 +74:39:11.9: 15.62 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 04:42:14.44 +69:04:11.3: 15.75 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 03:49:28.90 +73:11:12.7: 14.42 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 04:42:14.44 +69:04:11.3: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 03:49:28.90 +73:11:12.7: 14.57 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.48 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 03:49:28.90 +73:11:12.7: ref_mag=14.48 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=12.9294 delta=1.55 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 04:26:19.46 +74:06:03.0: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 03:41:00.12 +74:08:35.4: 13.62 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 04:26:19.46 +74:06:03.0: 15.76 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 04:16:26.13 +73:31:16.7: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 03:41:00.12 +74:08:35.4: 13.62 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.62 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:41:00.12 +74:08:35.4: ref_mag=13.62 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.2122 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 04:16:26.13 +73:31:16.7: 15.78 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 03:11:04.64 +71:24:33.7: 15.63 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 04:57:37.98 +70:38:36.3: 15.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 04:47:22.19 +70:17:08.4: 15.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 03:11:04.64 +71:24:33.7: 15.57 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 04:57:37.98 +70:38:36.3: 15.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 04:12:06.40 +68:58:39.6: 13.97 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 04:47:22.19 +70:17:08.4: 15.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 04:12:06.40 +68:58:39.6: 14.06 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.01 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:12:06.40 +68:58:39.6: ref_mag=14.01 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.3174 delta=0.70 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 03:45:35.58 +70:50:12.5: 13.70 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 03:45:35.58 +70:50:12.5: 13.62 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.66 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:45:35.58 +70:50:12.5: ref_mag=13.66 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.3107 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 05:58:09.00 +69:34:47.3: 15.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 04:22:38.96 +68:29:29.9: 15.66 +/- 0.34 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 04:28:24.85 +74:42:16.5: 14.27 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 05:58:09.00 +69:34:47.3: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 04:22:38.96 +68:29:29.9: 15.72 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.66 +/- 0.34
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 04:22:38.96 +68:29:29.9: ref_mag=15.66 +/- 0.34 new_mean_mag=13.4847 delta=2.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 04:28:24.85 +74:42:16.5: 14.42 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.33 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:28:24.85 +74:42:16.5: ref_mag=14.33 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.6974 delta=0.64 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 04:06:10.76 +72:02:26.8: 14.24 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 04:06:10.76 +72:02:26.8: 14.24 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.24 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:06:10.76 +72:02:26.8: ref_mag=14.24 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.5409 delta=0.70 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 04:04:23.92 +75:00:42.5: 15.63 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 04:04:23.92 +75:00:42.5: 15.66 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 04:07:04.90 +72:18:53.9: 15.87 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 04:37:33.74 +72:12:39.8: 15.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 04:07:04.90 +72:18:53.9: 15.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 04:37:33.74 +72:12:39.8: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 05:37:28.72 +67:25:34.9: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 05:37:28.72 +67:25:34.9: 15.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out127546.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out127560.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out127568.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out127586.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out127589.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out127592.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out127593.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out127600.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out127879.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out128154.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out128233.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out128368.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out128394.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out128529.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out128606.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out128674.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out128680.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out128750.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out128886.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out128917.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out129453.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out129690.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out129184.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out75888.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 22s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 127545_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046
The candidate 127545_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:12:49.00 +72:00:37.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 127546_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046
The candidate 127546_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:24:47.43 +68:41:54.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.05, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.03)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.180 496606353812829440 066.19979600257 +68.69793547431 14.4795 13.8250 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.180#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.8#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 127556_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046
The candidate 127556_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 127559_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046
The candidate 127559_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 127560_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046
The candidate 127560_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:44:44.96 +66:38:52.3 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.04, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.02)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 127568_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046
The candidate 127568_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:55:19.01 +69:26:17.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.61, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.59)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.813 494073491339886336 058.82983464140 +69.43747245265 13.6061 12.8902 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.813#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.8#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 127570_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046
The candidate 127570_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:36:06.13 +74:10:08.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 127576_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046
The candidate 127576_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:23:12.03 +73:37:02.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 127580_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046
The candidate 127580_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:23:13.66 +70:01:36.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 127582_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046
The candidate 127582_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:58:02.64 +65:53:37.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 127586_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046
The candidate 127586_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:05:02.13 +73:26:20.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.11, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.09)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.408 502276122959739392 076.25868112137 +73.43869623708 13.3203 12.8023 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.408#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.8#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 127587_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046
The candidate 127587_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:38:05.70 +67:25:57.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 127589_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046
The candidate 127589_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:22:13.45 +68:38:28.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.76, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.74)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.475 496611713932059904 065.55639113793 +68.64107652262 12.5078 11.5826 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.475#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.8#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 127592_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046
The candidate 127592_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:30:55.90 +71:39:25.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.74, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.72)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.443 1112902996504712192 097.73506070675 +71.65687094448 12.8518 12.2688 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.443#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.8#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 127593_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046
The candidate 127593_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:37:22.06 +67:03:55.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.78, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.76)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.184 483431009056799360 069.34169267802 +67.06442534769 12.7851 12.1811 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.184#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.8#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 127594_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046
The candidate 127594_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 127596_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046
The candidate 127596_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:41:14.34 +65:17:13.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 127597_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046
The candidate 127597_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:36.47 +63:43:35.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 127600_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046
The candidate 127600_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:36:19.33 +70:49:12.2 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.36, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.34)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 127610_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046
The candidate 127610_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:12:20.54 +64:57:36.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 127841_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046
The candidate 127841_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 127879_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046
The candidate 127879_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:40:19.87 +66:10:22.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=11.71, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=12.69)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.297 483143929144613248 070.08288477625 +66.17287099765 11.6743 11.1576 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.297#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.8#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 127957_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046
The candidate 127957_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 127975_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046
The candidate 127975_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 127981_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046
The candidate 127981_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128008_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046
The candidate 128008_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128024_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046
The candidate 128024_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128127_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046
The candidate 128127_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:51:33.83 +68:12:03.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128130_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046
The candidate 128130_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:17:16.22 +66:57:57.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128154_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046
The candidate 128154_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:15:46.63 +74:24:32.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.73, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.71)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.803 549716991681412864 063.94502843128 +74.40867892433 12.9285 12.4854 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.803#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.8#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128191_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046
The candidate 128191_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:03:07.73 +66:49:10.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128197_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046
The candidate 128197_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:52:25.05 +67:32:42.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128205_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046
The candidate 128205_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128221_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046
The candidate 128221_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128224_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046
The candidate 128224_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:53:50.67 +66:22:12.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128233_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046
The candidate 128233_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:18:40.75 +74:39:11.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.82, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.80)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.220 550096323192653184 064.66990356541 +74.65325213719 12.7442 12.0663 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.220#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.8#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128267_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046
The candidate 128267_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:13:40.79 +72:09:24.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128285_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046
The candidate 128285_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:25:43.23 +68:24:45.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128286_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046
The candidate 128286_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:15:45.43 +70:46:37.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128302_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046
The candidate 128302_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128318_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046
The candidate 128318_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:29:31.14 +69:21:51.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128347_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046
The candidate 128347_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:55:27.06 +74:20:36.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128360_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046
The candidate 128360_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128368_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046
The candidate 128368_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:42:14.44 +69:04:11.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.83, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.81)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.047 495937953823134976 070.56079114059 +69.06961917234 12.7949 12.2680 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.047#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.8#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128394_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046
The candidate 128394_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:49:28.90 +73:11:12.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.93, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.91)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.787 543728845198706688 057.37206204343 +73.18625057820 13.2285 12.6803 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.787#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.8#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128399_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046
The candidate 128399_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:51:32.70 +68:11:48.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128405_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046
The candidate 128405_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128409_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046
The candidate 128409_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128419_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046
The candidate 128419_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128426_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046
The candidate 128426_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128450_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046
The candidate 128450_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128455_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046
The candidate 128455_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128461_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046
The candidate 128461_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:13:54.08 +67:29:17.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128487_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046
The candidate 128487_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128500_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046
The candidate 128500_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:57:47.65 +72:59:15.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128529_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046
The candidate 128529_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:26:19.46 +74:06:03.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.26, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.24)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.569 501972898268222592 066.58214612584 +74.10050916443 13.2256 12.6029 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.569#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.8#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128566_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046
The candidate 128566_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128577_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046
The candidate 128577_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128585_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046
The candidate 128585_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128596_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046
The candidate 128596_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:35:57.16 +69:25:59.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128606_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046
The candidate 128606_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:16:26.13 +73:31:16.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.23, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.21)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.874 501576794907470080 064.11047006080 +73.52104798109 13.1622 12.6992 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.874#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.8#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128630_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046
The candidate 128630_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:31:47.33 +74:02:35.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128640_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046
The candidate 128640_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:19:15.92 +74:37:18.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128651_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046
The candidate 128651_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128671_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046
The candidate 128671_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:25:45.34 +67:00:45.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128674_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046
The candidate 128674_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:11:04.64 +71:24:33.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.39, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.37)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.991 543881093198944640 047.76881971181 +71.40913979449 13.2103 12.4060 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.991#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.8#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128680_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046
The candidate 128680_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:57:37.98 +70:38:36.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.31, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.29)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.345 497242283851163264 074.40847371213 +70.64305061262 13.1292 12.4351 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.345#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.8#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128714_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046
The candidate 128714_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128750_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046
The candidate 128750_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:47:22.19 +70:17:08.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.46, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.44)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.121 497192049913953664 071.84214992688 +70.28537316574 13.4828 12.8866 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.121#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.8#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128764_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046
The candidate 128764_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128774_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046
The candidate 128774_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:01:17.75 +73:02:34.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128788_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046
The candidate 128788_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128791_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046
The candidate 128791_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:48:51.70 +74:28:00.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128831_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046
The candidate 128831_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128832_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046
The candidate 128832_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:22:35.22 +67:04:21.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128855_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046
The candidate 128855_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128883_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046
The candidate 128883_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:11:02.03 +72:56:45.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128886_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046
The candidate 128886_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:58:09.00 +69:34:47.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.53, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.51)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.203 484904285917991808 089.53702443642 +69.57951545884 13.4396 12.9371 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.203#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.8#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128893_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046
The candidate 128893_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:19:26.65 +67:59:50.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128917_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046
The candidate 128917_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:22:38.96 +68:29:29.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.49, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.47)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.876 496597489000399104 065.66299515368 +68.49165788843 13.4841 12.8528 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.876#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.8#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128948_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046
The candidate 128948_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128953_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046
The candidate 128953_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:50:46.72 +73:38:17.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128955_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046
The candidate 128955_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:43:01.35 +73:22:44.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128956_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046
The candidate 128956_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128966_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046
The candidate 128966_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:17:15.92 +73:34:58.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128990_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046
The candidate 128990_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:22:03.48 +70:19:58.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128996_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046
The candidate 128996_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129001_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046
The candidate 129001_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129009_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046
The candidate 129009_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129033_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046
The candidate 129033_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:36:20.21 +73:19:28.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129045_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046
The candidate 129045_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:49:34.46 +66:16:29.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129078_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046
The candidate 129078_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:04:29.24 +65:50:13.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129085_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046
The candidate 129085_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:49:46.56 +66:14:45.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129105_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046
The candidate 129105_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129122_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046
The candidate 129122_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:29:19.44 +69:15:32.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129152_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046
The candidate 129152_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129184_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046
Preparing report for the candidate 129184_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129198_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046
The candidate 129198_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129286_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046
The candidate 129286_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:33:31.07 +68:42:41.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129317_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046
The candidate 129317_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129329_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046
The candidate 129329_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129375_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046
The candidate 129375_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129381_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046
The candidate 129381_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129433_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046
The candidate 129433_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129438_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046
The candidate 129438_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129439_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046
The candidate 129439_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129453_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046
The candidate 129453_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:07:04.90 +72:18:53.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.21, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.19)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.753 501341641155642880 061.77130509174 +72.31425669116 14.2387 13.8834 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.753#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.8#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129491_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046
The candidate 129491_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129497_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046
The candidate 129497_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129528_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046
The candidate 129528_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129567_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046
The candidate 129567_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129654_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046
The candidate 129654_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129681_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046
The candidate 129681_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129690_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046
The candidate 129690_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:37:33.74 +72:12:39.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.37, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.35)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.381 500773468521898112 069.39028709774 +72.21100081568 14.3297 13.5967 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.381#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.8#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 124383_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046
The candidate 124383_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:12:36.99 +69:29:09.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 42165_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046
The candidate 42165_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:18:00.54 +71:13:53.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71275_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046
The candidate 71275_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:31:43.71 +64:14:12.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01239_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046
The candidate 01239_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:45:42.23 +75:06:02.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75888_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046
Preparing report for the candidate 75888_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78647_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046
The candidate 78647_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-02_22-29-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0046 did not pass the final checks