This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-02_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_213851_TTUQ2b1x1_3465392_m5WOISBQ
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 03.1095 2461163.6095 11.05 05:00:49.49 +56:10:50.4
152.83668 8.56492 galactic Cam Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 7.2 pix
The object was found in VSX15" TX Cam
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
7.800 V 16.900 V 2455213.00000 558.700000000000 M8-M10
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits at 05:00:49.49 +56:10:50.4: 12.10 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-12-26_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits at 05:00:49.49 +56:10:50.4: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.10 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
TX Cam,2461163.6095,11.05,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
TX Cam 20260503.1095 11.05CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 03.1095 2461163.6095 13.14 04:03:03.38 +50:02:11.2
151.41355 -1.93227 galactic Per Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 7.7 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASASSN-V J040303.34+500209.9
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.830 V 15.470 V 2458378.30760 244.290397800000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits at 04:03:03.38 +50:02:11.2: 14.07 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-12-26_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits at 04:03:03.38 +50:02:11.2: 14.27 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.13 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 03.1095* 04 03 03.38 +50 02 11.2 13.1 U Per 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J040303.34+500209.9,2461163.6095,13.14,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J040303.34+500209.9 20260503.1095 13.14CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 03.1095 2461163.6095 12.55 03:43:52.69 +56:50:37.5
144.88821 1.51216 galactic Cam Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.7" and 7.4 pix
The object was found in VSX 5" NSVS 1972556
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
15.927 g Y 0.382 g 2458433.47340 151.224755700000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits at 03:43:52.69 +56:50:37.5: 13.59 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-12-26_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits at 03:43:52.69 +56:50:37.5: 13.57 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.58 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS 1972556,2461163.6095,12.55,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS 1972556 20260503.1095 12.55CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461032.79586206 23.12.2025 07:05:52.482 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits
First image: 2461032.79586206 23.12.2025 07:05:52.482 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits
Last image: 2461163.60984486 03.05.2026 02:38:00.596 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-02_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_213851_TTUQ2b1x1_3465392_m5WOISBQ/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 6
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.60
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 11260
Objects passed selection criteria: 11239
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 10243.5
Average stars matched: 9049.75 (88.3463 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 119812 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Apr 29 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-35-gf9552f12
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-29)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat May 2 21:40:19 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461032.79586206 23.12.2025 07:05:52.482 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits
First image: 2461032.79586206 23.12.2025 07:05:52.482 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits
Last image: 2461163.60984486 03.05.2026 02:38:00.596 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-02_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_213851_TTUQ2b1x1_3465392_m5WOISBQ/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 91
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.26
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 36 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 95935
Objects passed selection criteria: 95718
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 86436.5
Average stars matched: 76638.5 (88.6645 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1891228 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Apr 29 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-35-gf9552f12
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-29)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat May 2 21:43:25 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-12-26_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-02_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_213851_TTUQ2b1x1_3465392_m5WOISBQ/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-37-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0018.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-02_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_213851_TTUQ2b1x1_3465392_m5WOISBQ/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-12-26_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-12-26_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-02_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_213851_TTUQ2b1x1_3465392_m5WOISBQ/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-37-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0018.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-02_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_213851_TTUQ2b1x1_3465392_m5WOISBQ/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461163.60915836
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits'
wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-12-26_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-12-26_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-12-26_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-12-26_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits'
wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-37-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0018.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-37-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0018.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-37-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0018.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-37-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0018.fits'
wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:14:08.100 +53:59:32.78 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-37-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0018.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-37-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0018.fits
Image size: 938.0'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:14:07.923 +53:59:29.39 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:14:08.100 +53:59:32.78
Second-epoch image center 04:14:07.923 +53:59:29.39
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0010 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
Image size: 938.0'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:14:07.035 +54:00:12.33 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:14:08.100 +53:59:32.78
Second-epoch image center 04:14:07.035 +54:00:12.33
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0113 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 04:14:07.923 +53:59:29.39
Second-epoch second image center 04:14:07.035 +54:00:12.33
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01212 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits &> /tmp/tmp.th9Xb15gdI
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-12-26_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits &> /tmp/tmp.H59F2Pi7A1
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-12-26_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-02_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_213851_TTUQ2b1x1_3465392_m5WOISBQ/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-37-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0018.fits &> /tmp/tmp.hHUwkQSVip
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-02_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_213851_TTUQ2b1x1_3465392_m5WOISBQ/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-37-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0018.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-02_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_213851_TTUQ2b1x1_3465392_m5WOISBQ/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits &> /tmp/tmp.keFMTLr9HB
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-02_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_213851_TTUQ2b1x1_3465392_m5WOISBQ/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits and wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits and wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits and wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 19395 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 49.0381 to 78.9584 deg, Dec +47.6967 to +59.3546 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 49.0381 to 78.9584 deg, Dec 47.6967 to 59.3546 deg
Loaded 11456 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7296 out of 8078 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8078 out of 19395 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.971400
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.971400
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.60
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.37
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.37
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 19395 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 49.0381 to 78.9584 deg, Dec +47.6967 to +59.3546 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 49.0381 to 78.9584 deg, Dec 47.6967 to 59.3546 deg
Loaded 11456 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7296 out of 8078 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8078 out of 19395 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 17858 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 48.0291 to 77.8892 deg, Dec +47.5203 to +59.4612 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 48.0291 to 77.8892 deg, Dec 47.5203 to 59.4612 deg
Loaded 11754 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7352 out of 8083 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8083 out of 17858 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-12-26_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-12-26_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-12-26_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-12-26_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits (aperture=5.8)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 4 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits
2.0 pix Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-12-26_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits
2.4 pix fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-37-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0018.fits
2.4 pix fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits
2.0 pix wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-12-26_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits
15.3 mag. Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-12-26_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-37-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0018.fits
14.3 mag. fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.2 (SNR ) 11.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.th9Xb15gdI (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-02_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_213851_TTUQ2b1x1_3465392_m5WOISBQ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1810, passed=19395
Got 19395 stars (including 17553 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 19395 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 952 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18966 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18966 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18966 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 961 stars left (next iteration limit 1057)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits -region wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.H59F2Pi7A1 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-12-26_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-02_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_213851_TTUQ2b1x1_3465392_m5WOISBQ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-12-26_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-12-26_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-12-26_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-12-26_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-12-26_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-12-26_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-12-26_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-12-26_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-12-26_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-12-26_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-12-26_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-12-26_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-12-26_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-12-26_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-12-26_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-12-26_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-12-26_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-12-26_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-12-26_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1680, passed=17858
Got 17858 stars (including 16156 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-12-26_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 17858 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 687 to 749 (Dec 47.5 to 59.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 943 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17523 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 687 to 749 (Dec 47.5 to 59.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17522 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17521 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 962 stars left (next iteration limit 1058)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-12-26_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-12-26_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-12-26_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits -region wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-12-26_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-12-26_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.hHUwkQSVip (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-02_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_213851_TTUQ2b1x1_3465392_m5WOISBQ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-02_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_213851_TTUQ2b1x1_3465392_m5WOISBQ/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-37-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0018.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-02_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_213851_TTUQ2b1x1_3465392_m5WOISBQ/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-37-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0018.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-02_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_213851_TTUQ2b1x1_3465392_m5WOISBQ/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-37-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0018.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-02_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_213851_TTUQ2b1x1_3465392_m5WOISBQ/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-37-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0018.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-02_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_213851_TTUQ2b1x1_3465392_m5WOISBQ/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-37-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0018.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-02_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_213851_TTUQ2b1x1_3465392_m5WOISBQ/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-37-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0018.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-37-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0018.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-37-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0018.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-37-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0018.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-37-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0018.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-37-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0018.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-37-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0018.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-37-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0018.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-02_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_213851_TTUQ2b1x1_3465392_m5WOISBQ/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-37-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0018.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-37-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0018.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=576, passed=7312
Got 7312 stars (including 6734 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-37-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0018.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7312 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013028 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010422 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.1 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 951 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.62"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7233 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.62"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.1 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7232 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.62"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7232 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.63"
Excluding outliers - 960 stars left (next iteration limit 1056)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-37-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0018.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-37-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0018.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-02_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_213851_TTUQ2b1x1_3465392_m5WOISBQ/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-37-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0018.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-37-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0018.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-37-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0018.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.keFMTLr9HB (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-02_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_213851_TTUQ2b1x1_3465392_m5WOISBQ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-02_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_213851_TTUQ2b1x1_3465392_m5WOISBQ/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-02_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_213851_TTUQ2b1x1_3465392_m5WOISBQ/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-02_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_213851_TTUQ2b1x1_3465392_m5WOISBQ/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-02_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_213851_TTUQ2b1x1_3465392_m5WOISBQ/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-02_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_213851_TTUQ2b1x1_3465392_m5WOISBQ/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-02_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_213851_TTUQ2b1x1_3465392_m5WOISBQ/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-02_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_213851_TTUQ2b1x1_3465392_m5WOISBQ/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=595, passed=7631
Got 7631 stars (including 7026 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7631 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013028 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010422 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.2 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 951 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.64"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7553 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.63"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.2 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7551 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.64"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7551 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.67"
Excluding outliers - 960 stars left (next iteration limit 1054)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-02_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_213851_TTUQ2b1x1_3465392_m5WOISBQ/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-37-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0018.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-37-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0018.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-02_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_213851_TTUQ2b1x1_3465392_m5WOISBQ/wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-37-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0018.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-02_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_213851_TTUQ2b1x1_3465392_m5WOISBQ/wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cam-11-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits at 05:00:49.49 +56:10:50.4: 12.10 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-12-26_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits at 05:00:49.49 +56:10:50.4: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.10 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:00:49.49 +56:10:50.4: ref_mag=12.10 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.0540 delta=1.05 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out03783.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 7s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 24710_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019
The candidate 24710_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:17:05.16 +53:21:41.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12712_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019
The candidate 12712_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:11:45.16 +51:43:38.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 02928_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019
The candidate 02928_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:19:08.29 +57:38:20.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03783_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019
Preparing report for the candidate 03783_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 8s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cam-11-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
05:00:49.49 +56:10:50.4
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-12-26_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-02_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_213851_TTUQ2b1x1_3465392_m5WOISBQ/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-37-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0018.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-02_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_213851_TTUQ2b1x1_3465392_m5WOISBQ/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-12-26_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-12-26_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-02_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_213851_TTUQ2b1x1_3465392_m5WOISBQ/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-37-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0018.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-02_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_213851_TTUQ2b1x1_3465392_m5WOISBQ/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-12-26_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-37-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0018.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-12-26_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-37-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0018.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:14:08.100 +53:59:32.78 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-37-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0018.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-37-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0018.fits
Image size: 938.0'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:14:07.923 +53:59:29.39 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:14:08.100 +53:59:32.78
Second-epoch image center 04:14:07.923 +53:59:29.39
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0010 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
Image size: 938.0'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:14:07.035 +54:00:12.33 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:14:08.100 +53:59:32.78
Second-epoch image center 04:14:07.035 +54:00:12.33
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0113 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 04:14:07.923 +53:59:29.39
Second-epoch second image center 04:14:07.035 +54:00:12.33
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01212 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits &> /tmp/tmp.7OvjOE9fvD
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-12-26_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits &> /tmp/tmp.uvcHeMN868
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-12-26_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-02_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_213851_TTUQ2b1x1_3465392_m5WOISBQ/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-37-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0018.fits &> /tmp/tmp.wjevCPEny5
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-02_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_213851_TTUQ2b1x1_3465392_m5WOISBQ/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-37-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0018.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-02_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_213851_TTUQ2b1x1_3465392_m5WOISBQ/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits &> /tmp/tmp.WbX8VBv6qV
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-02_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_213851_TTUQ2b1x1_3465392_m5WOISBQ/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits and wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits and wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits and wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 146998 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 48.9350 to 78.9584 deg, Dec +47.6967 to +59.3589 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 48.9350 to 78.9584 deg, Dec 47.6967 to 59.3589 deg
Loaded 11494 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5947 out of 8185 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8185 out of 146998 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.830400
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.830400
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.26
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.57
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.57
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 146998 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 48.9350 to 78.9584 deg, Dec +47.6967 to +59.3589 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 48.9350 to 78.9584 deg, Dec 47.6967 to 59.3589 deg
Loaded 11494 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5947 out of 8185 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8185 out of 146998 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits (aperture=4.4)
Read 143524 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 47.9561 to 77.9030 deg, Dec +47.5204 to +59.4634 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 47.9561 to 77.9030 deg, Dec 47.5204 to 59.4634 deg
Loaded 11792 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6073 out of 8200 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8200 out of 143524 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-12-26_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-12-26_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-12-26_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-12-26_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits (aperture=4.4)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 68 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits
1.9 pix Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-12-26_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits
2.2 pix fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-37-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0018.fits
2.2 pix fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
1.9 pix wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits
1.9 pix wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-12-26_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits
15.5 mag. Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-12-26_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits
14.3 mag. fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-37-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0018.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.3 (SNR ) 13.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.7OvjOE9fvD (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-02_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_213851_TTUQ2b1x1_3465392_m5WOISBQ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=38, blended=16000, passed=146960
Got 146960 stars (including 130714 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 146960 stars from the SExtractor catalog
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-02_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_213851_TTUQ2b1x1_3465392_m5WOISBQ/util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 949 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 144690 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 144691 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 144691 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 963 stars left (next iteration limit 1059)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits -region wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.uvcHeMN868 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-12-26_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-02_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_213851_TTUQ2b1x1_3465392_m5WOISBQ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-12-26_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-12-26_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-12-26_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-12-26_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-12-26_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-12-26_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-12-26_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-12-26_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-12-26_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-12-26_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-12-26_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-12-26_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-12-26_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-12-26_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-12-26_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-12-26_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-12-26_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-12-26_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-12-26_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=30, blended=14844, passed=143494
Got 143494 stars (including 128380 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-12-26_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 143494 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 687 to 749 (Dec 47.5 to 59.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 956 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 142262 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 687 to 749 (Dec 47.5 to 59.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 142264 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 142264 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 966 stars left (next iteration limit 1062)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-12-26_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-12-26_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-12-26_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits -region wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-12-26_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-12-26_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.wjevCPEny5 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-02_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_213851_TTUQ2b1x1_3465392_m5WOISBQ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-02_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_213851_TTUQ2b1x1_3465392_m5WOISBQ/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-37-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0018.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-02_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_213851_TTUQ2b1x1_3465392_m5WOISBQ/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-37-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0018.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-02_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_213851_TTUQ2b1x1_3465392_m5WOISBQ/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-37-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0018.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-02_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_213851_TTUQ2b1x1_3465392_m5WOISBQ/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-37-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0018.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-02_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_213851_TTUQ2b1x1_3465392_m5WOISBQ/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-37-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0018.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-02_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_213851_TTUQ2b1x1_3465392_m5WOISBQ/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-37-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0018.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-37-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0018.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-37-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0018.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-37-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0018.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-37-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0018.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-37-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0018.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-37-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0018.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-37-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0018.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-02_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_213851_TTUQ2b1x1_3465392_m5WOISBQ/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-37-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0018.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-37-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0018.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=3553, passed=58364
Got 58364 stars (including 54722 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-37-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0018.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 58364 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013028 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010422 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.1 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 957 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.62"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 57787 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.1 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 57785 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 57785 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Excluding outliers - 966 stars left (next iteration limit 1062)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-37-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0018.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-37-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0018.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-02_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_213851_TTUQ2b1x1_3465392_m5WOISBQ/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-37-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0018.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-37-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0018.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-37-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0018.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.WbX8VBv6qV (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-02_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_213851_TTUQ2b1x1_3465392_m5WOISBQ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-02_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_213851_TTUQ2b1x1_3465392_m5WOISBQ/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-02_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_213851_TTUQ2b1x1_3465392_m5WOISBQ/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-02_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_213851_TTUQ2b1x1_3465392_m5WOISBQ/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-02_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_213851_TTUQ2b1x1_3465392_m5WOISBQ/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-02_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_213851_TTUQ2b1x1_3465392_m5WOISBQ/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-02_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_213851_TTUQ2b1x1_3465392_m5WOISBQ/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-02_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_213851_TTUQ2b1x1_3465392_m5WOISBQ/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=1, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=1, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=4232, passed=61126
Got 61126 stars (including 56811 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 61126 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013028 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010422 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.1 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 958 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 60346 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.1 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 60345 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 60345 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
Excluding outliers - 967 stars left (next iteration limit 1063)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-02_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_213851_TTUQ2b1x1_3465392_m5WOISBQ/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-37-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0018.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-02_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_213851_TTUQ2b1x1_3465392_m5WOISBQ/wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-37-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0018.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-02_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_213851_TTUQ2b1x1_3465392_m5WOISBQ/wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cam-11-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits at 04:15:15.68 +56:03:35.4: 14.07 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits at 04:52:41.38 +50:28:25.1: 13.91 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits at 04:06:40.54 +56:52:58.4: 14.14 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits at 04:29:56.53 +55:41:05.9: 14.22 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits at 03:59:09.92 +51:45:20.8: 13.36 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits at 04:49:43.42 +53:55:58.5: 13.67 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-12-26_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits at 04:52:41.38 +50:28:25.1: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.91 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:52:41.38 +50:28:25.1: ref_mag=13.91 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.7990 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-12-26_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits at 04:06:40.54 +56:52:58.4: 13.99 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-12-26_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits at 04:29:56.53 +55:41:05.9: 14.14 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.06 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:06:40.54 +56:52:58.4: ref_mag=14.06 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0610 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.18 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:29:56.53 +55:41:05.9: ref_mag=14.18 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.1131 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-12-26_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits at 04:15:15.68 +56:03:35.4: 13.91 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.99 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:15:15.68 +56:03:35.4: ref_mag=13.99 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.9285 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits at 03:47:00.41 +50:52:49.4: 13.02 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-12-26_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits at 03:59:09.92 +51:45:20.8: 13.51 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.43 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:59:09.92 +51:45:20.8: ref_mag=13.43 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2943 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-12-26_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits at 04:49:43.42 +53:55:58.5: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.67 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:49:43.42 +53:55:58.5: ref_mag=13.67 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7913 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-12-26_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits at 03:47:00.41 +50:52:49.4: 13.03 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.03 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:47:00.41 +50:52:49.4: ref_mag=13.03 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1160 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits at 04:52:29.64 +51:22:01.7: 11.03 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits at 04:56:41.94 +50:55:28.8: 12.09 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-12-26_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits at 04:52:29.64 +51:22:01.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.03 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:52:29.64 +51:22:01.7: ref_mag=11.03 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.1901 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-12-26_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits at 04:56:41.94 +50:55:28.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.09 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:56:41.94 +50:55:28.8: ref_mag=12.09 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3832 delta=-0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits at 04:45:21.37 +54:25:33.6: 13.26 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits at 05:00:13.46 +54:32:28.3: 13.91 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-12-26_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits at 04:45:21.37 +54:25:33.6: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits at 04:59:22.79 +52:30:14.6: 13.43 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.26 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:45:21.37 +54:25:33.6: ref_mag=13.26 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4962 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-12-26_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits at 05:00:13.46 +54:32:28.3: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.91 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:00:13.46 +54:32:28.3: ref_mag=13.91 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.6092 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-12-26_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits at 04:59:22.79 +52:30:14.6: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.43 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:59:22.79 +52:30:14.6: ref_mag=13.43 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.4423 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits at 04:29:10.08 +52:28:45.5: 14.04 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits at 04:33:33.68 +57:57:13.2: 14.27 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-12-26_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits at 04:29:10.08 +52:28:45.5: 13.82 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.92 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:29:10.08 +52:28:45.5: ref_mag=13.92 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7952 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-12-26_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits at 04:33:33.68 +57:57:13.2: 14.08 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.17 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:33:33.68 +57:57:13.2: ref_mag=14.17 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.0220 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits at 04:03:03.38 +50:02:11.2: 14.07 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits at 03:43:52.69 +56:50:37.5: 13.59 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-12-26_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits at 04:03:03.38 +50:02:11.2: 14.27 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.13 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 04:03:03.38 +50:02:11.2: ref_mag=14.13 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.1397 delta=1.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-12-26_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits at 03:43:52.69 +56:50:37.5: 13.57 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.58 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 03:43:52.69 +56:50:37.5: ref_mag=13.58 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.5272 delta=1.05 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out111787.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out33473.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 11s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194810_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019
The candidate 194810_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194812_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019
The candidate 194812_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194814_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019
The candidate 194814_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194822_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019
The candidate 194822_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194823_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019
The candidate 194823_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194834_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019
The candidate 194834_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:16:07.73 +51:05:36.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194838_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019
The candidate 194838_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194844_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019
The candidate 194844_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:27:46.49 +57:49:00.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194845_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019
The candidate 194845_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:59:19.12 +53:17:05.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194847_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019
The candidate 194847_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:41:18.02 +55:14:04.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194848_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019
The candidate 194848_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:46:04.29 +57:26:00.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194849_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019
The candidate 194849_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:43:26.84 +56:00:27.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194851_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019
The candidate 194851_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194857_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019
The candidate 194857_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:28:59.77 +53:48:09.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194860_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019
The candidate 194860_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194867_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019
The candidate 194867_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195070_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019
The candidate 195070_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:20:05.87 +50:53:21.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195078_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019
The candidate 195078_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:59:10.28 +58:01:04.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195115_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019
The candidate 195115_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:52:26.98 +51:22:56.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195138_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019
The candidate 195138_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:50:43.08 +50:26:14.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195180_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019
The candidate 195180_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:13:04.23 +49:43:18.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195188_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019
The candidate 195188_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:40:18.24 +51:05:28.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195208_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019
The candidate 195208_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:15:09.56 +50:40:21.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195219_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019
The candidate 195219_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:40:17.10 +53:28:24.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195221_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019
The candidate 195221_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:49:18.22 +52:39:27.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195235_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019
The candidate 195235_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:56:08.29 +57:55:51.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195265_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019
The candidate 195265_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:56:16.36 +52:52:59.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195270_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019
The candidate 195270_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:15:16.38 +57:26:41.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195305_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019
The candidate 195305_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:41:42.27 +54:40:55.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195309_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019
The candidate 195309_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:15:20.33 +53:40:53.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195311_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019
The candidate 195311_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:22:11.59 +51:01:12.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195318_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019
The candidate 195318_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:47:45.58 +51:10:52.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195336_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019
The candidate 195336_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:47:01.86 +51:42:09.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195366_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019
The candidate 195366_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:35:47.21 +52:49:59.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195383_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019
The candidate 195383_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195391_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019
The candidate 195391_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:55:10.69 +56:46:12.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195398_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019
The candidate 195398_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:10:38.21 +57:50:50.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195401_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019
The candidate 195401_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:48:56.04 +50:41:28.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195405_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019
The candidate 195405_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:41:18.02 +57:54:09.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195420_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019
The candidate 195420_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:17:29.21 +50:06:20.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195421_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019
The candidate 195421_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195430_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019
The candidate 195430_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195433_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019
The candidate 195433_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:35:49.73 +57:16:33.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195438_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019
The candidate 195438_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:01:40.39 +53:50:09.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195448_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019
The candidate 195448_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:15:12.14 +53:43:56.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195481_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019
The candidate 195481_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:33:27.21 +52:49:20.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195484_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019
The candidate 195484_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:21:15.54 +56:43:06.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195521_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019
The candidate 195521_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:07:46.47 +51:25:57.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195534_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019
The candidate 195534_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:21:49.69 +50:00:46.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195544_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019
The candidate 195544_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:05:34.55 +53:05:04.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195545_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019
The candidate 195545_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:02:15.74 +52:53:28.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195565_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019
The candidate 195565_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:27:06.36 +51:11:56.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195594_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019
The candidate 195594_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:19:10.41 +55:32:37.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195615_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019
The candidate 195615_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:04:45.00 +55:44:07.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195636_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019
The candidate 195636_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:11:27.29 +51:21:04.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195665_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019
The candidate 195665_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:33:55.60 +56:41:26.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195669_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019
The candidate 195669_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195700_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019
The candidate 195700_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195719_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019
The candidate 195719_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:22:38.77 +50:25:46.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 16080_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019
The candidate 16080_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:08:49.81 +58:06:55.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72836_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019
The candidate 72836_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:06:12.37 +53:56:29.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120872_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019
The candidate 120872_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:54:30.57 +50:41:24.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20400_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019
The candidate 20400_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:19:08.25 +57:38:19.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58019_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019
The candidate 58019_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:46:24.78 +54:28:49.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111787_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019
Preparing report for the candidate 111787_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53150_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019
The candidate 53150_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 44543_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019
The candidate 44543_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-02_21-38-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0019 did not pass the final checks