NMW transient search results

This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-28_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_220512_TTUQ1b1x1_665054_FOSwpByo

The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.

Processing fields Gem-03-Q1b1x1

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 04 29.12743    2461159.62743    11.53    06:22:48.32 +22:55:56.4   5494 2717   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-28_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_220512_TTUQ1b1x1_665054_FOSwpByo/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 04 29.12806    2461159.62806    11.43    06:22:48.24 +22:55:56.6   5496 2715   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-28_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_220512_TTUQ1b1x1_665054_FOSwpByo/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-04-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 04 29.1277  2461159.6277  11.48  06:22:48.28 +22:55:56.5
189.33798   4.33190 galactic  Gem  Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 2.5 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
10 Hygiea                   3     -1       3  11.9     0    0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:22:48.28 +22:55:56.5:  15.89 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_22-00-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits at 06:22:48.28 +22:55:56.5:  15.78 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Processing complete!

Total number of candidates identified: 1

Processing log:

Filtering log:

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.0
FLAT_FIELD_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-04-08.fit
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 8000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 4000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 3.5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
Gem-03-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Gem-03-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing Gem-03-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 1142825 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 1142825 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_22-00-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0028.png' -> 'transient_report/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits_preview.png'
Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits

renamed 'Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-04-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029.png' -> 'transient_report/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-04-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029.fits_preview.png'
Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-04-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029.fits


Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold. ---------------------------------------------- INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 652.7112 INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 807.6072 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 7419.3471 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 1331.2783 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 7556.4697 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 1587.5747 ---------------------------------------------- INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 11.367 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.161 ERROR: passing clouds (SD ratio=0.161 soft threshold=0.12) ---------------------------------------------- Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-04-08.fit EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= -5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 19.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 22.5 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-28_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_220512_TTUQ1b1x1_665054_FOSwpByo/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits CCD-TEMP= -5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-28_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_220512_TTUQ1b1x1_665054_FOSwpByo/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits SET-TEMP= -5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-28_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_220512_TTUQ1b1x1_665054_FOSwpByo/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-04-28T22:03:20.3323932' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-04-29T03:03:20.3323932' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61159.1273186575 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-04-29T03:03:30.2361719' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61159.127433287 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= -5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 96.9219969880952 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 22.000010467785 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 33.3111111111111 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 275.719722222222 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.8168585325273 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Gem-03' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '06 27 41' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+22 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29474 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29474 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 19.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 19.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= -10.6 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 10.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 897.6 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 22.5 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 327.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 5.400432 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 1.800144 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-28_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_220512_TTUQ1b1x1_665054_FOSwpByo/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= -5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-28_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_220512_TTUQ1b1x1_665054_FOSwpByo/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits SET-TEMP= -5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-22.fit CCD-TEMP= -5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-28_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_220512_TTUQ1b1x1_665054_FOSwpByo/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits CCD-TEMP= -5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-22.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-22.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-28_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_220512_TTUQ1b1x1_665054_FOSwpByo/d_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits :) Spent 0.474510 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-22.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-28_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_220512_TTUQ1b1x1_665054_FOSwpByo/d_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-04-08.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 37805.313903 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-28_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_220512_TTUQ1b1x1_665054_FOSwpByo/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24603.0, right_median=28063.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-04-08.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-28_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_220512_TTUQ1b1x1_665054_FOSwpByo/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= -5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -4.9 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 19.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 22.5 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-28_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_220512_TTUQ1b1x1_665054_FOSwpByo/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-04-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029.fits CCD-TEMP= -4.900000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-28_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_220512_TTUQ1b1x1_665054_FOSwpByo/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-04-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029.fits SET-TEMP= -5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-28_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_220512_TTUQ1b1x1_665054_FOSwpByo/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-04-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-04-28T22:04:14.2696806' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-04-29T03:04:14.2696806' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61159.1279429281 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-04-29T03:04:24.1725418' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61159.1280575464 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= -5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -4.9 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 96.9219970377855 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 22.0000104719617 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 33.1252777777778 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 275.8325 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.82582197704803 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Gem-03' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '06 27 41' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+22 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29474 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29474 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 19.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 19.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= -10.6 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 10.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 897.6 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 22.5 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 327.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 5.400432 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 1.800144 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-28_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_220512_TTUQ1b1x1_665054_FOSwpByo/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-04-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= -5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-28_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_220512_TTUQ1b1x1_665054_FOSwpByo/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-04-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029.fits SET-TEMP= -5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-22.fit CCD-TEMP= -4.900000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-28_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_220512_TTUQ1b1x1_665054_FOSwpByo/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-04-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029.fits CCD-TEMP= -5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-22.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-22.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-28_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_220512_TTUQ1b1x1_665054_FOSwpByo/d_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-04-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029.fits :) Spent 0.472792 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-22.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-28_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_220512_TTUQ1b1x1_665054_FOSwpByo/d_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-04-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-04-08.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 37805.313903 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-28_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_220512_TTUQ1b1x1_665054_FOSwpByo/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-04-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24603.0, right_median=28063.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-04-08.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-28_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_220512_TTUQ1b1x1_665054_FOSwpByo/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-04-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029.fits Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-28_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_220512_TTUQ1b1x1_665054_FOSwpByo/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-28_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_220512_TTUQ1b1x1_665054_FOSwpByo/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-04-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029.fits Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:

fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits


fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-04-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029.fits


Updating neverexclude_list.txt '/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt' Choosing bad regions list '/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst' wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_22-00-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-28_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_220512_TTUQ1b1x1_665054_FOSwpByo/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-28_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_220512_TTUQ1b1x1_665054_FOSwpByo/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-04-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_22-00-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_22-00-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-28_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_220512_TTUQ1b1x1_665054_FOSwpByo/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-28_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_220512_TTUQ1b1x1_665054_FOSwpByo/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-04-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461159.62743440 Plate-solving the images 'asassn_transients_list.txt' -> '../asassn_transients_list.txt' 'tocp_transients_list.txt' -> '../tocp_transients_list.txt' 'tns_transients_list.txt' -> '../tns_transients_list.txt' wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits' wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_22-00-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_22-00-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_22-00-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_22-00-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits' wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits' wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-04-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-04-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-04-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-04-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029.fits' ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits Image size: 937.3'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 06:27:43.229 +21:58:14.98 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits Image size: 941.6'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 06:27:39.135 +22:03:52.89 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 06:27:43.229 +21:58:14.98 Second-epoch image center 06:27:39.135 +22:03:52.89 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0952 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-04-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-04-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029.fits Image size: 941.6'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 06:27:39.729 +22:03:41.36 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 06:27:43.229 +21:58:14.98 Second-epoch image center 06:27:39.729 +22:03:41.36 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0917 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 06:27:39.135 +22:03:52.89 Second-epoch second image center 06:27:39.729 +22:03:41.36 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00394 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for ar aprallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits &> /tmp/tmp.xYZNa6lyhB Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_22-00-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits &> /tmp/tmp.eebZo9m12t Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_22-00-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-28_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_220512_TTUQ1b1x1_665054_FOSwpByo/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits &> /tmp/tmp.T4UrT5ZyCr Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-28_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_220512_TTUQ1b1x1_665054_FOSwpByo/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-28_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_220512_TTUQ1b1x1_665054_FOSwpByo/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-04-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029.fits &> /tmp/tmp.XujrEpDaly Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-28_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_220512_TTUQ1b1x1_665054_FOSwpByo/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-04-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits and wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.cat Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits and wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.cat Found non-empty wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits and wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.cat The reference image (wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.cat) found 'wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 31529 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 88.2263 to 105.7470 deg, Dec +16.5197 to +27.2361 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 88.2263 to 105.7470 deg, Dec 16.5197 to 27.2361 deg Loaded 19334 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 14346 out of 15828 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 15828 out of 31529 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.874746 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.874746 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.82 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.05 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.05
Magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 31529 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 88.2263 to 105.7470 deg, Dec +16.5197 to +27.2361 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 88.2263 to 105.7470 deg, Dec 16.5197 to 27.2361 deg Loaded 19334 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 14346 out of 15828 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 15828 out of 31529 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits via Tycho-2 Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits (aperture=6.6) Read 26641 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 88.1506 to 105.6298 deg, Dec +16.4659 to +27.2917 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 88.1506 to 105.6298 deg, Dec 16.4659 to 27.2917 deg Loaded 19496 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 13998 out of 15281 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 15281 out of 26641 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_22-00-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits via Tycho-2 Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_22-00-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_22-00-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits (aperture=6.7) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 1 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.5 pix Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits 2.6 pix Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_22-00-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits 2.2 pix fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits 2.4 pix fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-04-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029.fits 2.5 pix wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits 2.6 pix wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_22-00-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.1 mag. Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits 14.9 mag. Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_22-00-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits 11.3 mag. fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits 10.9 mag. fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-04-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 10.9 (SNR ) 9.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.xYZNa6lyhB (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-28_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_220512_TTUQ1b1x1_665054_FOSwpByo/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits 570.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=3030, passed=31529 Got 31529 stars (including 28473 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 31529 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.2) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 938 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 918 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30215 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.2) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30214 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30213 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.63" Excluding outliers - 934 stars left (next iteration limit 1026) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits -region wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.eebZo9m12t (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_22-00-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-28_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_220512_TTUQ1b1x1_665054_FOSwpByo/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_22-00-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits 570.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_22-00-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_22-00-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_22-00-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_22-00-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_22-00-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_22-00-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_22-00-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_22-00-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_22-00-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_22-00-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_22-00-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_22-00-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_22-00-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_22-00-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_22-00-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_22-00-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_22-00-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_22-00-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2535, passed=26641 Got 26641 stars (including 24084 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_22-00-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 26641 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 937 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 915 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.67" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25558 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.66" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 938 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25559 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.66" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25561 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.68" Excluding outliers - 935 stars left (next iteration limit 1027) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_22-00-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_22-00-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_22-00-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits -region wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_22-00-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_22-00-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.T4UrT5ZyCr (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-28_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_220512_TTUQ1b1x1_665054_FOSwpByo/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-28_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_220512_TTUQ1b1x1_665054_FOSwpByo/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-28_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_220512_TTUQ1b1x1_665054_FOSwpByo/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-28_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_220512_TTUQ1b1x1_665054_FOSwpByo/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-28_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_220512_TTUQ1b1x1_665054_FOSwpByo/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-28_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_220512_TTUQ1b1x1_665054_FOSwpByo/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-28_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_220512_TTUQ1b1x1_665054_FOSwpByo/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-28_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_220512_TTUQ1b1x1_665054_FOSwpByo/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=129, passed=1506 Got 1506 stars (including 1375 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 1506 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 589 (Dec 16.5 to 27.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 914 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 878 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1448 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 589 (Dec 16.5 to 27.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 915 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1450 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1447 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47" Excluding outliers - 905 stars left (next iteration limit 997) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-28_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_220512_TTUQ1b1x1_665054_FOSwpByo/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.XujrEpDaly (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-28_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_220512_TTUQ1b1x1_665054_FOSwpByo/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-28_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_220512_TTUQ1b1x1_665054_FOSwpByo/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-04-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-28_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_220512_TTUQ1b1x1_665054_FOSwpByo/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-04-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-28_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_220512_TTUQ1b1x1_665054_FOSwpByo/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-04-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-28_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_220512_TTUQ1b1x1_665054_FOSwpByo/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-04-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-28_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_220512_TTUQ1b1x1_665054_FOSwpByo/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-04-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-28_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_220512_TTUQ1b1x1_665054_FOSwpByo/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-04-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-04-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-04-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-04-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-04-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-04-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-04-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-04-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-28_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_220512_TTUQ1b1x1_665054_FOSwpByo/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-04-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-04-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=121, passed=1382 Got 1382 stars (including 1261 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-04-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 1382 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 589 (Dec 16.4 to 27.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 913 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 879 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1328 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 589 (Dec 16.4 to 27.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 914 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1331 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1331 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50" Excluding outliers - 906 stars left (next iteration limit 997) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-04-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-04-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-28_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_220512_TTUQ1b1x1_665054_FOSwpByo/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-04-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-04-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-04-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-28_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_220512_TTUQ1b1x1_665054_FOSwpByo/wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-04-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-04-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-28_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_220512_TTUQ1b1x1_665054_FOSwpByo/wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-04-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029.fits' Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-03-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 50739_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-04-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029 The candidate 50739_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-04-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 29.12806    2461159.62806    7.83    06:32:17.92 +17:46:47.3   3949 5725   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-28_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_220512_TTUQ1b1x1_665054_FOSwpByo/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-04-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029.fits **** FOUND 06:32:17.94 +17:46:46.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt **** make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 0s Prepared the HTML report for the field Gem-03-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_22-00-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-28_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_220512_TTUQ1b1x1_665054_FOSwpByo/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-28_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_220512_TTUQ1b1x1_665054_FOSwpByo/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-04-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_22-00-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_22-00-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-28_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_220512_TTUQ1b1x1_665054_FOSwpByo/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-28_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_220512_TTUQ1b1x1_665054_FOSwpByo/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-04-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_22-00-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-04-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images Plate-solving the images wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_22-00-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-04-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits Image size: 937.3'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 06:27:43.229 +21:58:14.98 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits Image size: 941.6'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 06:27:39.135 +22:03:52.89 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 06:27:43.229 +21:58:14.98 Second-epoch image center 06:27:39.135 +22:03:52.89 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0952 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-04-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-04-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029.fits Image size: 941.6'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 06:27:39.729 +22:03:41.36 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 06:27:43.229 +21:58:14.98 Second-epoch image center 06:27:39.729 +22:03:41.36 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0917 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 06:27:39.135 +22:03:52.89 Second-epoch second image center 06:27:39.729 +22:03:41.36 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00394 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for ar aprallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits &> /tmp/tmp.POUK4aQ9tz Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_22-00-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits &> /tmp/tmp.8ahcjLN6hx Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_22-00-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-28_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_220512_TTUQ1b1x1_665054_FOSwpByo/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits &> /tmp/tmp.sk6SRpv10G Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-28_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_220512_TTUQ1b1x1_665054_FOSwpByo/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-28_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_220512_TTUQ1b1x1_665054_FOSwpByo/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-04-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029.fits &> /tmp/tmp.r8Fwux83bH Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-28_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_220512_TTUQ1b1x1_665054_FOSwpByo/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-04-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits and wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.cat Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits and wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.cat Found non-empty wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits and wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.cat The reference image (wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.cat) found 'wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 188638 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 88.2262 to 105.7469 deg, Dec +16.5004 to +27.2400 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 88.2262 to 105.7469 deg, Dec 16.5004 to 27.2400 deg Loaded 19369 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 11425 out of 16449 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 16449 out of 188638 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.720113 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.720113 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.53 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.19 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.19
Magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 188638 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 88.2262 to 105.7469 deg, Dec +16.5004 to +27.2400 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 88.2262 to 105.7469 deg, Dec 16.5004 to 27.2400 deg Loaded 19369 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 11425 out of 16449 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 16449 out of 188638 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits via Tycho-2 Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits (aperture=5.2) Read 182142 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 88.1255 to 105.6362 deg, Dec +16.4660 to +27.2916 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 88.1255 to 105.6362 deg, Dec 16.4660 to 27.2916 deg Loaded 19527 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 11894 out of 16496 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 16496 out of 182142 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_22-00-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits via Tycho-2 Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_22-00-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_22-00-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits (aperture=5.0) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 17 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.4 pix Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits 2.2 pix Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_22-00-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits 1.9 pix fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits 2.0 pix fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-04-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029.fits 2.4 pix wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits 2.2 pix wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_22-00-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.2 mag. Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits 15.1 mag. Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_22-00-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits 12.1 mag. fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits 11.9 mag. fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-04-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 11.9 (SNR ) 11.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.POUK4aQ9tz (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-28_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_220512_TTUQ1b1x1_665054_FOSwpByo/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits 570.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=44, blended=29566, passed=188594 Got 188594 stars (including 158851 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 188594 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.2) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 915 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.67" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 182109 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.64" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.2) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 182109 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.64" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 182111 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.68" Excluding outliers - 936 stars left (next iteration limit 1029) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits -region wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.8ahcjLN6hx (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_22-00-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-28_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_220512_TTUQ1b1x1_665054_FOSwpByo/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_22-00-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits 570.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_22-00-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_22-00-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_22-00-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_22-00-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_22-00-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_22-00-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_22-00-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_22-00-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_22-00-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_22-00-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_22-00-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_22-00-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_22-00-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_22-00-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_22-00-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_22-00-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_22-00-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_22-00-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=130, blended=25627, passed=182012 Got 182012 stars (including 156174 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_22-00-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 182012 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 911 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.71" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 174284 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.68" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 174284 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.68" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 174286 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.71" Excluding outliers - 938 stars left (next iteration limit 1031) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_22-00-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_22-00-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_22-00-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits -region wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_22-00-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_22-00-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.sk6SRpv10G (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-28_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_220512_TTUQ1b1x1_665054_FOSwpByo/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-28_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_220512_TTUQ1b1x1_665054_FOSwpByo/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-28_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_220512_TTUQ1b1x1_665054_FOSwpByo/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-28_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_220512_TTUQ1b1x1_665054_FOSwpByo/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-28_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_220512_TTUQ1b1x1_665054_FOSwpByo/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-28_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_220512_TTUQ1b1x1_665054_FOSwpByo/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-28_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_220512_TTUQ1b1x1_665054_FOSwpByo/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-28_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_220512_TTUQ1b1x1_665054_FOSwpByo/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=1, blended=552, passed=20838 Got 20838 stars (including 20254 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 20838 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 918 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 879 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20041 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 918 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20038 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20038 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46" Excluding outliers - 909 stars left (next iteration limit 1001) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-28_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_220512_TTUQ1b1x1_665054_FOSwpByo/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.r8Fwux83bH (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-28_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_220512_TTUQ1b1x1_665054_FOSwpByo/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-28_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_220512_TTUQ1b1x1_665054_FOSwpByo/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-04-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-28_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_220512_TTUQ1b1x1_665054_FOSwpByo/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-04-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-28_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_220512_TTUQ1b1x1_665054_FOSwpByo/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-04-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-28_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_220512_TTUQ1b1x1_665054_FOSwpByo/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-04-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-28_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_220512_TTUQ1b1x1_665054_FOSwpByo/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-04-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-28_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_220512_TTUQ1b1x1_665054_FOSwpByo/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-04-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-04-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-04-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-04-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-04-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-04-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-04-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-04-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-28_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_220512_TTUQ1b1x1_665054_FOSwpByo/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-04-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-04-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=3, blended=486, passed=18555 Got 18555 stars (including 18035 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-04-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 18555 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 912 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 886 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17964 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 912 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17965 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17965 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48" Excluding outliers - 905 stars left (next iteration limit 995) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-04-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-04-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-28_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_220512_TTUQ1b1x1_665054_FOSwpByo/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-04-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-04-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-04-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-28_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_220512_TTUQ1b1x1_665054_FOSwpByo/wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-04-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-28_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_220512_TTUQ1b1x1_665054_FOSwpByo/wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-04-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029.fits Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-03-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out214736.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out214859.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 5s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 214366_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-04-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029 The candidate 214366_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-04-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 29.12806    2461159.62806    11.09    06:45:03.63 +26:21:02.9   2615 0413   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-28_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_220512_TTUQ1b1x1_665054_FOSwpByo/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-04-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029.fits **** FOUND 06:45:03.73 +26:21:03.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 214369_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-04-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029 The candidate 214369_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-04-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 29.12806    2461159.62806    10.39    06:05:56.62 +26:36:31.4   7914 0590   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-28_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_220512_TTUQ1b1x1_665054_FOSwpByo/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-04-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029.fits **** FOUND 06:05:56.60 +26:36:31.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 214372_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-04-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029 The candidate 214372_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-04-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 29.12806    2461159.62806    8.11    06:27:45.88 +20:46:58.1   4723 3962   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-28_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_220512_TTUQ1b1x1_665054_FOSwpByo/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-04-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029.fits **** FOUND 06:27:45.89 +20:46:58.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 214373_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-04-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029 The candidate 214373_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-04-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 29.12806    2461159.62806    7.34    06:32:17.92 +17:46:47.1   3949 5725   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-28_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_220512_TTUQ1b1x1_665054_FOSwpByo/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-04-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029.fits **** FOUND 06:32:17.93 +17:46:46.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 214447_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-04-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029 The candidate 214447_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-04-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 29.12806    2461159.62806    10.07    06:22:23.48 +27:13:38.0   5708 0126   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-28_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_220512_TTUQ1b1x1_665054_FOSwpByo/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-04-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029.fits **** FOUND 06:22:23.50 +27:13:37.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 214587_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-04-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029 The candidate 214587_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-04-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 29.12806    2461159.62806    10.88    06:14:36.53 +22:29:52.6   6619 3036   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-28_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_220512_TTUQ1b1x1_665054_FOSwpByo/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-04-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029.fits **** FOUND 06:14:36.50 +22:29:51.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 214592_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-04-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029 The candidate 214592_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-04-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 29.12806    2461159.62806    10.73    05:56:15.56 +25:19:29.9   9228 1392   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-28_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_220512_TTUQ1b1x1_665054_FOSwpByo/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-04-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029.fits **** FOUND 05:56:15.51 +25:19:30.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 214624_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-04-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029 The candidate 214624_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-04-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 29.12806    2461159.62806    11.05    06:14:39.79 +22:30:04.6   6612 3034   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-28_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_220512_TTUQ1b1x1_665054_FOSwpByo/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-04-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029.fits **** FOUND 06:14:39.80 +22:30:03.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 214650_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-04-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029 The candidate 214650_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-04-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 29.12806    2461159.62806    11.15    06:04:03.97 +27:08:24.2   8180 0271   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-28_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_220512_TTUQ1b1x1_665054_FOSwpByo/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-04-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029.fits **** FOUND 06:04:04.04 +27:08:23.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 214655_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-04-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029 The candidate 214655_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-04-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 29.12806    2461159.62806    10.91    06:27:38.56 +22:46:18.3   4821 2769   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-28_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_220512_TTUQ1b1x1_665054_FOSwpByo/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-04-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 214736_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-04-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029 The candidate 214736_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-04-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 29.12806    2461159.62806    11.29    06:25:31.62 +24:09:58.6   5167 1950   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-28_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_220512_TTUQ1b1x1_665054_FOSwpByo/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-04-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029.fits **** FOUND 06:25:31.62 +24:09:57.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=11.30, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=12.28)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.869 3383614886927379584 096.38201375953 +24.16603703840 11.5312 10.8381 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.869#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9# xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 214859_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-04-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029 Preparing report for the candidate 214859_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-04-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 214885_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-04-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029 The candidate 214885_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-04-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 29.12806    2461159.62806    11.54    06:32:09.78 +24:14:44.0   4262 1839   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-28_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_220512_TTUQ1b1x1_665054_FOSwpByo/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-04-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 214915_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-04-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029 The candidate 214915_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-04-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 29.12806    2461159.62806    11.93    06:30:03.02 +27:04:44.7   4674 0150   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-28_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_220512_TTUQ1b1x1_665054_FOSwpByo/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-04-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 214976_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-04-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029 The candidate 214976_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-04-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 29.12806    2461159.62806    11.98    06:36:25.75 +25:18:15.4   3730 1155   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-28_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_220512_TTUQ1b1x1_665054_FOSwpByo/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-04-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 132306_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-04-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029 The candidate 132306_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-04-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 04 29.12806    2461159.62806    6.69    06:28:57.75 +20:12:48.1   4531 4292   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-28_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_220512_TTUQ1b1x1_665054_FOSwpByo/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-04-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029.fits **** FOUND 06:28:57.75 +20:12:48.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 89033_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-04-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029 The candidate 89033_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-04-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 04 29.12806    2461159.62806    6.53    06:14:52.88 +22:30:28.3   6582 3028   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-28_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_220512_TTUQ1b1x1_665054_FOSwpByo/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_22-04-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029.fits **** FOUND 06:14:52.87 +22:30:27.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt **** make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 6s Prepared the HTML report for the field Gem-03-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### 06:22:48.28 +22:55:56.5 ########### Completed Gem-03-Q1b1x1 ########### The analysis was running at tau We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt #### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources #### 06:22:48.28 +22:55:56.5 ################################################################################### 06:22:48.28 +22:55:56.5 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' # Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix) Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars). ################################################################################### 0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels) This does not look like a test run ################################################################################### Adding identified Gaia sources from exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND IS_THIS_TEST_RUN= NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES #### Adding the following to the exclusion list #### 06:25:31.62 +24:09:57.8 #################################################### The observatory MPC code is V36 ############################################################ Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461159.62743440 -observatory V36 01:25:07.52 +06:39:49.5 Mercury (-0.6mag) 04:14:21.41 +22:02:47.2 Venus (-3.9mag) 00:55:02.48 +04:54:40.4 Mars (1.2mag) 07:19:27.71 +22:34:22.6 Jupiter (-2.0mag) 00:34:53.18 +01:24:09.4 Saturn (0.9mag) 03:50:35.68 +19:56:38.5 Uranus (5.8mag) 00:12:28.96 -00:05:06.1 Neptune (7.8mag) 20:34:09.56 -22:53:49.9 Pluto (14.5mag) 12:30:30.90 -06:38:34.1 Moon (-12.0mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 363 Apr 28 22:06 planets.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461159.62743440: 07:19:33.52 +22:34:07.8 Io (5.8mag) 07:19:16.40 +22:34:48.3 Europa (6.0mag) 07:19:43.89 +22:33:49.9 Ganymede (5.4mag) 07:19:33.41 +22:34:18.8 Callisto (6.7mag) 07:22:08.84 +22:16:37.1 Himalia (15.4mag) 07:19:25.33 +22:34:29.8 Thebe (16.3mag) 07:22:33.48 +22:46:19.4 Elara (17.4mag) 07:19:13.69 +23:07:30.5 Pasiphae (17.5mag) 07:27:27.91 +22:33:30.1 Carme (18.6mag) 00:35:03.96 +01:24:18.4 Titan (8.8mag) 00:34:49.68 +01:24:19.1 Rhea (10.1mag) 00:34:23.78 +01:22:27.5 Iapetus (11.5mag) 00:35:00.06 +01:23:50.0 Hyperion (14.8mag) 00:36:18.80 +01:31:27.5 Phoebe (16.8mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 569 Apr 28 22:06 moons.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461159.62743440: 16:26:39.42 -24:02:07.8 JWST 03:58:01.12 -47:49:12.3 Chandra 17:20:01.96 -47:31:08.7 XMM-Newton -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Apr 28 22:06 spacecraft.txt ############################################################ Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461159.62743440 -observatory V36 -> Warning: Longitude 255.61742 is outside valid range [-180, 180] 06:14:42.55 +30:12:26.6 17.9mag P/2009 WX51 (Catalina) 18:55:32.04 -29:36:52.7 13.8mag P/2010 H2 (Vales) 05:16:50.36 -69:05:27.6 17.4mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein) 05:35:42.30 +31:32:15.4 17.3mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS) 17:28:18.59 +12:02:40.2 17.7mag C/2021 G2 (ATLAS) 23:13:05.88 +29:47:26.3 17.1mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS) 04:44:49.75 +26:22:14.9 16.1mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS) 09:07:18.02 +31:59:59.0 16.3mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS) 08:33:53.88 +01:08:34.8 17.4mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS) 18:49:41.39 +19:34:52.1 17.6mag C/2023 A3 (Tsuchinshan-ATLAS) 15:35:52.71 -11:19:46.2 17.5mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS) 09:02:50.14 -09:54:20.0 17.8mag C/2023 F3 (ATLAS) 22:05:30.03 +63:44:23.8 17.6mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon) 19:05:01.23 -04:03:01.1 14.0mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS) 20:19:23.71 +87:42:28.8 17.8mag C/2023 X2 (Lemmon) 06:26:07.73 +63:31:06.6 17.3mag C/2024 A1 (ATLAS) 05:39:41.46 +21:56:32.4 11.8mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos) 16:10:00.18 +08:29:42.4 17.3mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS) 20:23:18.20 +18:58:29.0 14.4mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS) 03:38:30.42 -20:29:10.1 16.3mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS) 05:28:18.81 +42:13:40.4 17.8mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov) 12:47:53.34 +51:14:15.3 15.8mag C/2025 L1 (ATLAS) 03:47:15.77 -28:25:39.2 17.9mag C/2025 Q3 (ATLAS) 03:20:41.09 +03:16:03.8 8.1mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS) 12:48:42.07 +03:44:09.2 17.3mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS) 04:44:22.47 +01:47:43.1 16.1mag C/2026 A1 (MAPS) 00:34:51.92 +39:20:28.9 15.0mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao) 19:08:20.77 -09:00:20.0 11.1mag 10P/Tempel 14:42:43.49 +01:36:26.9 15.2mag 24P/Schaumasse 11:00:05.87 -01:09:46.4 15.8mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 10:38:52.63 -03:13:53.4 17.2mag 43P/Wolf-Harrington 02:09:05.72 +19:40:30.2 17.3mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson 07:36:05.45 +34:05:34.1 17.0mag 63P/Wild 23:45:15.07 -09:56:25.1 15.7mag 65P/Gunn 04:39:38.25 +25:25:38.7 16.0mag 76P/West-Kohoutek-Ikemura 01:35:00.21 +10:45:04.3 14.2mag 78P/Gehrels 23:41:12.41 -05:31:42.2 14.8mag 88P/Howell 02:48:37.73 +23:55:29.9 15.0mag 93P/Lovas 05:20:43.62 +32:53:18.7 16.1mag 123P/West-Hartley 08:45:36.20 +32:20:29.9 16.3mag 124P/Mrkos 02:53:48.34 +15:46:55.5 16.4mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt 03:13:28.67 +15:59:22.9 17.6mag 131P/Mueller 02:36:47.19 +17:03:21.1 10.6mag 141P/Machholz 02:43:23.56 +09:36:30.5 10.6mag 141P-A/Machholz 01:24:07.19 +05:21:12.0 11.4mag 141P-D/Machholz 01:39:24.41 +05:06:28.0 14.9mag 162P/SidingSpring 22:13:46.92 -08:22:19.2 17.9mag 218P/LINEAR 17:16:49.22 -12:19:10.9 16.1mag 235P/LINEAR 06:03:26.53 +35:29:01.0 17.0mag 240P/NEAT 07:45:56.55 -03:52:40.6 17.8mag 242P/Spahr 22:49:48.77 -17:12:40.5 17.5mag 260P/McNaught 02:25:58.28 +23:42:52.0 17.9mag 295P/LINEAR 15:36:39.07 +07:44:46.5 17.4mag 391P/Kowalski 07:40:10.72 +21:21:21.8 17.7mag 450P/LONEOS 05:55:38.34 +44:15:52.5 17.6mag 493P/LONEOS -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.8K Apr 28 22:06 comets.txt ############################################################ List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html : 16:34:34.94 -54:34:58.20 ASASSN-26da 2026-04-25.14 15.99 10:06:55.04 -01:13:49.70 SN2026jsg 2026-04-24.99 16.28 15:15:57.17 +56:18:32.80 SN2026kid 2026-04-24.52 -3.65 07:58:28.45 +57:03:42.40 AT2026kcf 2026-04-24.2 16.89 11:38:21.80 -50:43:06.50 SN2026jkb 2026-04-24.24 15.38 10:06:11.41 -39:41:04.20 AT2026dil 2026-04-24.2 16.85 14:21:40.08 +13:13:46.30 SN2026jlm 2026-04-22.16 15.12 10:53:55.47 -16:06:07.00 ASASSN-26cz 2026-04-22.24 16.32 16:34:34.94 -54:34:58.20 2026-04-25.14 15.99 13:45:02.03 +15:17:14.50 ASASSN-26cy 2026-04-21.27 15.78 13:20:52.22 -35:57:03.60 AT2026jcm 2026-04-19.01 16.65 13:36:15.66 -36:53:48.40 SN 2026iqy 2026-04-18.92 17.31 06:34:01.33 -40:07:34.00 ASASSN-26cx 2026-04-19.07 16.16 23:33:57.97 -45:12:11.90 SN 2026idu 2026-04-19.41 15.9 12:10:50.92 +66:55:31.20 SN 2026icv 2026-04-17.14 16.03 21:36:59.06 -60:43:35.90 ASASSN-26cv 2026-04-17.35 -1.18 08:13:26.26 -27:07:30.50 ASASSN-26cw 2026-04-17.07 -1.01 14:49:14.13 -27:29:20.60 ASASSN-26cu 2026-04-16.06 14.03 17:21:59.44 -38:54:04.60 ASASSN-26ct 2026-04-14.4 15.15 15:25:54.99 +07:49:24.50 SN2026huo 2026-04-12.14 16.96 16:34:34.94 -54:34:58.20 2026-04-25.14 15.99 12:23:20.40 +04:53:39.10 AT2026ixd 2026-04-12.14 17.65 17:46:09.76 -61:19:50.40 SN2026icy 2026-04-12.2 17.03 09:25:46.42 +02:13:46.30 SN2026gud 2026-04-11.98 16.49 16:52:15.46 -60:27:45.90 ASASSN-26cs 2026-04-12.4 15.5 04:20:55.37 -51:15:31.10 ASASSN-26cr 2026-04-12.01 15.37 22:25:39.35 +36:45:06.90 AT2026ihl 2026-04-10.48 14.21 19:40:44.94 +00:41:03.80 AT2026imw 2026-04-10.32 16.06 19:52:04.70 +05:53:33.50 ASASSN-26cq 2026-04-9.31 14.98 16:08:18.39 -64:11:08.80 ASASSN-26cp 2026-04-9.14 13.64 09:22:22.90 -61:02:43.70 SN2026idh 2026-04-7.97 16.34 05:06:54.12 -19:42:26.40 AT2026imr 2026-04-8 17.49 07:14:55.34 -36:03:21.40 AT2026hei 2026-04-8.12 16.7 21:35:33.14 -19:01:34.80 AT2026ihm 2026-04-8.36 16.7 04:28:24.08 -32:25:35.30 AT2026imo 2026-04-8.02 16.81 05:10:35.79 -39:38:40.80 SN 2026hnn 2026-04-7.04 17.07 09:54:32.04 -01:17:25.80 ASASSN-26cn 2026-04-7.01 15.58 07:46:24.43 -77:29:35.90 ASASSN-26co 2026-04-7.15 14.93 05:00:45.52 -29:51:06.20 AT2026hvw 2026-04-6.03 16.51 19:49:33.10 -23:37:11.00 ASASSN-26cl 2026-04-5.29 14.98 19:32:43.55 -22:39:33.40 ASASSN-26cm 2026-04-4.3 13.88 18:08:57.38 +76:48:23.60 ASASSN-26ck 2026-04-2.37 15.38 16:16:36.10 +44:52:30.20 AT2026hyy 2026-04-2.58 13.81 21:55:23.31 -34:48:53.90 ASASSN-26cj 2026-03-30.4 -1.47 11:19:50.81 -27:51:50.40 SN2026gvk 2026-03-30 15.28 11:53:57.02 -23:09:46.20 SN2026gzx 2026-03-28.75 15.27 07:13:46.14 -33:10:15.70 ASASSN-26ci 2026-03-28.15 15.14 09:03:36.09 -67:58:13.00 SN2026hkg 2026-03-28.19 15.82 07:03:00.72 +39:14:43.00 SN2026fin 2026-03-28.27 15.82 05:35:42.80 -63:44:05.50 ASASSN-26ch 2026-03-27.86 13.02 11:23:19.04 +34:22:38.00 SN2026fwt 2026-03-27.3 16.56 19:03:49.79 +37:04:05.20 ASASSN-26ce 2026-03-26.56 16.3 20:26:56.07 -52:54:06.50 AT2026hiy 2026-03-26.35 16.95 05:25:54.76 -30:15:35.80 ASASSN-26cg 2026-03-25.07 16.88 06:57:16.49 -26:54:37.20 SN2026fzb 2026-03-25.14 15.8 14:37:38.23 -43:00:52.30 ASASSN-26cd 2026-03-24.24 12.52 17:34:53.03 +06:04:29.70 AT2026gzl 2026-03-23.27 15.82 08:30:02.60 -35:12:47.50 ASASSN-26cf 2026-03-23.2 14.82 16:54:25.33 +37:49:56.60 SN 2026evz 2026-03-21.32 17.54 17:06:19.20 -18:54:19.50 ASASSN-26bx 2026-03-21.25 16.39 19:01:16.28 -29:29:23.10 ASASSN-26bw 2026-03-21.33 15.81 08:46:05.75 +10:47:39.80 ASASSN-26ca 2026-03-21.13 14.27 12:14:58.16 +63:47:16.20 SN 2026fvx 2026-03-21.12 15.6 18:02:55.90 -75:23:02.60 ASASSN-26bz 2026-03-21.32 16.16 12:16:02.87 -53:16:33.70 ASASSN-26cc 2026-03-20.08 3.93 13:08:21.85 +29:13:44.20 SN 2026fmh 2026-03-20.16 -0.33 19:56:38.48 -34:45:21.50 ASASSN-26cb 2026-03-20.35 -3.26 14:32:41.15 -41:38:48.50 ASASSN-26by 2026-03-20.15 -1.31 13:00:42.99 +37:18:34.60 SN2026fjc 2026-03-19.5 15.97 06:02:44.21 -04:11:06.20 ASASSN-26bv 2026-03-19.19 15.67 12:20:27.96 -45:55:38.40 ASASSN-26bt 2026-03-18.8 16.32 07:49:57.30 -56:14:35.10 ASASSN-26bu 2026-03-19.19 15.74 06:04:29.75 +53:23:34.00 SN 2026eza 2026-03-18.2 17.48 11:54:57.87 +69:19:28.90 AT2026fsf 2026-03-18.14 16.95 10:44:46.95 +58:27:29.30 SN 2026enn 2026-03-18.13 17.53 20:45:54.04 -73:26:43.00 AT 2026ezy 2026-03-18.13 16.83 06:53:18.10 -59:10:49.30 ASASSN-26bs 2026-03-18.02 16.93 07:45:09.29 -62:14:36.20 ASASSN-26br 2026-03-16.16 16.78 19:24:27.93 -52:04:36.40 AT 2023uk 2026-03-16.35 14.2 04:52:54.50 -15:20:57.10 AT2026fhw 2026-03-14.06 SDSS 11:10:34.24 +02:58:48.10 SN2026drr 2026-03-14.08 0.2 07:26:45.73 -27:45:13.90 ASASSN-26bo 2026-03-14.17 13.8 16:35:46.94 +58:12:28.40 SN2026ebt 2026-03-12.41 17.12 13:01:19.45 +15:42:15.00 SN2026ehe 2026-03-12.11 -0.29 09:15:55.41 +10:08:09.70 SN2026efq 2026-03-12.16 0.06 03:31:20.92 -35:29:29.00 SN2026evh 2026-03-12.05 17.29 06:26:19.15 -85:18:28.10 AT2026ffp 2026-03-12.16 0.37 14:16:42.30 -41:18:36.50 AT2026fij 2026-03-12.05 15.97 10:45:04.71 +00:06:13.10 SN 2026exe 2026-03-11.78 16.48 18:07:45.58 +69:43:01.00 SN2026ess 2026-03-12.37 17.37 13:11:03.58 +49:06:31.80 AT2026ewa 2026-03-12.42 16.77 15:03:25.23 -63:11:22.20 ASASSN-26bp 2026-03-11.92 13.33 13:09:37.25 -35:50:25.20 AT2024cmo 2026-03-11.12 16.29 13:06:01.97 -15:50:14.40 AT2026fdy 2026-03-10.33 16.68 11:30:09.70 -47:26:45.00 ASASSN-26bn 2026-03-10.3 15.14 05:03:25.25 -24:16:50.40 (= Gaia 2026-03-9.09 14.32 03:42:32.53 -04:17:53.70 ASASSN-26bm 2026-03-8.04 15.22 04:31:00.53 -68:29:50.20 ASASSN-26bl 2026-03-7.9 10.26 16:18:17.61 +41:25:11.40 SN 2026dkf 2026-03-6.31 16.7 13:45:00.35 +61:16:50.90 SN 2026ejl 2026-03-6.41 -0.66 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.8K Apr 28 22:06 asassn_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html : 08:01:11.02 -03:43:14.1 TCP J08011102-0343141 2026-02-08.8090 15.10Cmag 05:19:15.40 -02:04:51.5 TCP J05191540-0204515 2026-02-13.4306 14.5mag 10:52:41.26 +36:40:08.9 TCP J10524126+3640089 2026-02-17.6065 17.4mag 05:50:50.81 +36:22:45.1 TCP J05505081+3622451 2026-02-17.5511 15.7mag 00:42:51.33 +41:13:49.1 PNV J00425133+4113491 2026-02-20.738 18.3mag 00:43:04.88 +41:29:41.4 PNV J00430488+4129414 2026-02-20.5923 18.84Cmag 17:43:29.74 +11:24:00.3 TCP J17432974+1124003 2026-02-22.3773 13.6mag 09:55:01.59 +69:08:42.7 PNV J09550159+6908427 2026-02-20.893 19.0mag 07:03:25.76 -12:41:40.1 TCP J07032576-1241401 2026-03-10.4268 15.4mag 00:42:36.82 +41:16:05.8 PNV J00423682+4116058 2026-03-12.5744 17.24Cmag 07:26:45.79 -27:45:14.1 TCP J07264579-2745141 2026-03-17.4417 14.8mag 17:57:19.56 -28:08:14.7 TCP J17571956-2808147 2026-03-19.7972 14.5mag 08:46:05.73 +10:47:39.7 TCP J08460573+1047397 2026-03-21.1936 14.5mag 09:55:38.83 +69:05:21.7 PNV J09553883+6905217 2026-04-01.893 19.4mag 19:32:43.67 -22:39:30.7 TCP J19324367-2239307 2026-04-05.4395 13.6mag 16:16:36.03 +44:52:28.9 TCP J16163603+4452289 2026-04-05.6655 14.2mag 00:43:38.36 +41:15:32.4 PNV J00433836+4115324 2026-04-08.079 17.2mag 15:41:11.68 +59:18:26.8 TCP J15411168+5918268 2026-04-12.9625 19.2mag 00:43:35.02 +41:46:28.0 PNV J00433502+4146280 2026-04-23.056 15.9mag 00:42:55.64 +41:14:12.2 PNV J00425564+4114122 2026-04-24.042 16.2mag -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 188K Apr 28 22:06 tocp_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ : 10:56:52.527 +38:43:02.06 AT 2026khl 2026-04-20.25 19.73 16:16:44.333 +52:18:26.69 AT 2026khk 2026-04-19.51 20.2 14:44:33.224 +13:28:05.23 AT 2026khj 2026-04-21.41 19.73 16:09:12.398 +04:55:54.03 AT 2026khi 2026-04-20.52 20.97 19:02:47.110 +47:03:07.12 AT 2026khh 2026-04-14.23 19.64 20:50:35.204 +13:38:49.37 AT 2026khg 2026-04-14.22 19.81 20:26:18.237 -36:23:03.88 AT 2026khf 2026-04-14.80 19.84 11:31:56.240 +09:46:11.18 AT 2026khe 2026-04-11.98 19.99 17:14:06.281 -09:07:50.24 AT 2026khd 2026-03-24.78 20.41 11:51:39.769 -32:37:47.81 AT 2026khc 2026-04-12.44 20.23 11:31:53.568 -43:58:12.63 AT 2026khb 2026-04-12.44 20.17 12:49:47.564 +53:21:17.16 AT 2026kha 2026-04-13.100 19.83 15:43:26.957 +41:52:55.68 AT 2026kgz 2026-04-12.12 19.96 14:26:51.866 +60:24:31.86 AT 2026kgy 2026-04-21.11 19.1 04:18:17.932 -46:11:54.70 AT 2026kgx 2026-01-04.13 23.26 17:39:40.560 +14:49:02.18 AT 2026kgw 2026-04-21.45 19.4006 13:34:06.597 +11:18:46.85 AT 2026kgv 2026-04-17.31 20.5502 04:07:49.305 -49:16:52.86 AT 2026kgu 2026-01-11.08 23.7 04:06:28.945 -47:25:15.01 AT 2026kgt 2026-02-17.10 22.87 09:51:04.284 +41:30:11.28 AT 2026kgs 2026-04-14.88 19.38 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 29K Apr 28 22:06 tns_transients_list.txt

Profiling:

CPU temperature: 60 C