This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-28_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_213542_TTUQ1b1x1_205661_G4CNslke
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 04 29.1072 2461159.6072 11.68 06:03:33.49 +21:38:25.3
188.34227 -0.19565 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 7.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.16 Psyche 3 -0 3 12.0 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits at 06:03:33.49 +21:38:25.3: 15.72 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 06:03:33.49 +21:38:25.3: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461159.6072,11.68,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260429.1072 11.68CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 04 29.1072 2461159.6072 11.91 05:23:50.17 +26:15:18.0
179.64930 -5.50898 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 6.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.471 Papagena 1 -1 2 11.6 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits at 05:23:50.17 +26:15:18.0: 15.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:23:50.17 +26:15:18.0: 15.85 +/- 0.34 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.85 +/- 0.34
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 29.1072* 05 23 50.17 +26 15 18.0 11.9 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461159.6072,11.91,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260429.1072 11.91CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 04 29.1072 2461159.6072 12.43 05:52:50.44 +26:33:15.4
182.86434 0.14375 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 7.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.196 Philomela 3 -1 4 12.9 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits at 05:52:50.44 +26:33:15.4: 15.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:52:50.44 +26:33:15.4: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 29.1072* 05 52 50.44 +26 33 15.4 12.4 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461159.6072,12.43,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260429.1072 12.43CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 04 29.1072 2461159.6072 12.68 06:01:50.18 +19:08:16.3
190.32117 -1.78015 galactic Ori Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 7.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.32 Pomona 3 -1 3 13.2 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits at 06:01:50.18 +19:08:16.3: 15.72 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 06:01:50.18 +19:08:16.3: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 29.1072* 06 01 50.18 +19 08 16.3 12.7 U Ori 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461159.6072,12.68,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260429.1072 12.68CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 04 29.1072 2461159.6072 12.84 05:08:17.47 +22:48:31.4
180.47683 -10.37703 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 6.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.654 Zelinda 1 -0 1 12.9 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits at 05:08:17.47 +22:48:31.4: 15.94 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:08:17.47 +22:48:31.4: 15.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 29.1072* 05 08 17.47 +22 48 31.4 12.8 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461159.6072,12.84,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260429.1072 12.84CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 04 29.1072 2461159.6072 13.05 05:59:21.87 +22:18:21.6
187.28265 -0.71103 galactic Ori Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 7.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.43 Ariadne 3 -2 3 13.4 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits at 05:59:21.87 +22:18:21.6: 15.74 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:59:21.87 +22:18:21.6: 15.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 29.1072* 05 59 21.87 +22 18 21.6 13.1 U Ori 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461159.6072,13.05,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260429.1072 13.05CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 04 29.1072 2461159.6072 13.29 05:09:46.06 +25:06:21.1
178.77929 -8.76804 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.0" and 7.1 pix
The object was found in VSX24" HAT-262-0015868
Type: VAR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
15.005 V Y 0.052 V 0.213416000000
The object was found in astcheck.245 Vera 1 -1 2 13.6 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits at 05:09:46.06 +25:06:21.1: 15.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:09:46.06 +25:06:21.1: 15.94 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 29.1072* 05 09 46.06 +25 06 21.1 13.3 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
HAT-262-0015868,2461159.6072,13.29,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
HAT-262-0015868 20260429.1072 13.29CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.59907050 18.01.2026 02:22:29.691 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits
First image: 2461058.59907050 18.01.2026 02:22:29.691 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits
Last image: 2461159.60752572 29.04.2026 02:34:40.222 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-28_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_213542_TTUQ1b1x1_205661_G4CNslke/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 3
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.73
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 19144
Objects passed selection criteria: 19050
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.6 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.6 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 13681.8
Average stars matched: 13145 (96.0769 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 124472 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Apr 21 18:08:25 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-27-g1ba0f777
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-21)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Apr 28 21:36:55 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.59907050 18.01.2026 02:22:29.691 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits
First image: 2461058.59907050 18.01.2026 02:22:29.691 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits
Last image: 2461159.60752572 29.04.2026 02:34:40.222 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-28_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_213542_TTUQ1b1x1_205661_G4CNslke/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 63
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.42
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 31 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 138131
Objects passed selection criteria: 137852
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 104658
Average stars matched: 97530 (93.1895 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 2690144 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Apr 21 18:08:25 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-27-g1ba0f777
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-21)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Apr 28 21:40:34 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-28_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_213542_TTUQ1b1x1_205661_G4CNslke/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-33-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0010.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-28_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_213542_TTUQ1b1x1_205661_G4CNslke/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-28_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_213542_TTUQ1b1x1_205661_G4CNslke/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-33-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0010.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-28_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_213542_TTUQ1b1x1_205661_G4CNslke/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461159.60683072
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
'tocp_transients_list.txt' -> '../tocp_transients_list.txt'
wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits'
wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits'
wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-33-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0010.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-33-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0010.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-33-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0010.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-33-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0010.fits'
wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:19.516 +22:00:20.86 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-33-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0010.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-33-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
Image size: 941.8'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:05.984 +22:03:02.55 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:32:19.516 +22:00:20.86
Second-epoch image center 05:32:05.984 +22:03:02.55
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0689 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
Image size: 941.8'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:08.923 +22:03:14.37 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:32:19.516 +22:00:20.86
Second-epoch image center 05:32:08.923 +22:03:14.37
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0632 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:32:05.984 +22:03:02.55
Second-epoch second image center 05:32:08.923 +22:03:14.37
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01182 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits &> /tmp/tmp.YcUM1FKM1C
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits &> /tmp/tmp.9Kbo8KVGpv
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-28_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_213542_TTUQ1b1x1_205661_G4CNslke/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-33-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0010.fits &> /tmp/tmp.TuQ5keEnQ9
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-28_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_213542_TTUQ1b1x1_205661_G4CNslke/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-33-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-28_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_213542_TTUQ1b1x1_205661_G4CNslke/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011.fits &> /tmp/tmp.lV8SMpsm4S
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-28_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_213542_TTUQ1b1x1_205661_G4CNslke/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits.cat
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
The guess is 571 arcmin.
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits
The reference image (wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 21750 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.1679 to 91.6836 deg, Dec +16.3329 to +27.3623 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.1679 to 91.6836 deg, Dec 16.3329 to 27.3623 deg
Loaded 12332 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9225 out of 10163 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10163 out of 21750 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.911310
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.911310
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.73
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.18
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.18
Magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 21750 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.1679 to 91.6836 deg, Dec +16.3329 to +27.3623 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.1679 to 91.6836 deg, Dec 16.3329 to 27.3623 deg
Loaded 12332 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9225 out of 10163 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10163 out of 21750 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits via Tycho-2
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits (aperture=6.2)
Read 20916 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3784 to 91.9052 deg, Dec +16.4882 to +27.3012 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3784 to 91.9052 deg, Dec 16.4882 to 27.3012 deg
Loaded 12326 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8851 out of 10017 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10017 out of 20916 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits via Tycho-2
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits (aperture=6.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 3 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits
2.0 pix Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
2.6 pix fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-33-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
2.6 pix fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits
2.0 pix wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits
15.2 mag. Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
13.7 mag. fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-33-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
13.7 mag. fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.7 (SNR ) 10.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.YcUM1FKM1C (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-28_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_213542_TTUQ1b1x1_205661_G4CNslke/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2103, passed=21750
Got 21750 stars (including 19623 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 21750 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 932 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 887 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20482 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 932 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20478 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20479 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 928 stars left (next iteration limit 1020)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits -region wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.9Kbo8KVGpv (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-28_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_213542_TTUQ1b1x1_205661_G4CNslke/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2320, passed=20916
Got 20916 stars (including 18570 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 20916 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 937 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 905 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20166 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 936 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20166 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20167 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Excluding outliers - 934 stars left (next iteration limit 1027)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits -region wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.TuQ5keEnQ9 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-28_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_213542_TTUQ1b1x1_205661_G4CNslke/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-28_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_213542_TTUQ1b1x1_205661_G4CNslke/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-33-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0010.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-28_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_213542_TTUQ1b1x1_205661_G4CNslke/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-33-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-28_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_213542_TTUQ1b1x1_205661_G4CNslke/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-33-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-28_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_213542_TTUQ1b1x1_205661_G4CNslke/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-33-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-28_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_213542_TTUQ1b1x1_205661_G4CNslke/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-33-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-28_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_213542_TTUQ1b1x1_205661_G4CNslke/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-33-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-33-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-33-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-33-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0010.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-33-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0010.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-33-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0010.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-33-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0010.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-33-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-28_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_213542_TTUQ1b1x1_205661_G4CNslke/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-33-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-33-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0010.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=678, passed=6312
Got 6312 stars (including 5627 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-33-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0010.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6312 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 935 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 931 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 889 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 931 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5992 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 935 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 929 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5991 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 929 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5991 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Excluding outliers - 929 stars left (next iteration limit 1024)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-33-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0010.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-33-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0010.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-28_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_213542_TTUQ1b1x1_205661_G4CNslke/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-33-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0010.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-33-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0010.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-33-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0010.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.lV8SMpsm4S (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-28_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_213542_TTUQ1b1x1_205661_G4CNslke/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-28_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_213542_TTUQ1b1x1_205661_G4CNslke/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-28_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_213542_TTUQ1b1x1_205661_G4CNslke/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-28_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_213542_TTUQ1b1x1_205661_G4CNslke/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-28_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_213542_TTUQ1b1x1_205661_G4CNslke/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-28_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_213542_TTUQ1b1x1_205661_G4CNslke/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-28_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_213542_TTUQ1b1x1_205661_G4CNslke/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-28_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_213542_TTUQ1b1x1_205661_G4CNslke/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=642, passed=6103
Got 6103 stars (including 5457 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6103 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 933 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 929 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 888 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 929 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5803 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 933 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5806 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5806 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Excluding outliers - 927 stars left (next iteration limit 1021)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-28_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_213542_TTUQ1b1x1_205661_G4CNslke/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-33-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-33-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0010.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-28_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_213542_TTUQ1b1x1_205661_G4CNslke/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-33-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0010.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-28_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_213542_TTUQ1b1x1_205661_G4CNslke/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32114_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 32114_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:08:16.81 +21:56:43.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07111_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 07111_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:55:48.86 +20:10:32.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 02586_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 02586_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:56.44 +17:54:31.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Tau-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-28_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_213542_TTUQ1b1x1_205661_G4CNslke/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-33-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0010.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-28_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_213542_TTUQ1b1x1_205661_G4CNslke/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-28_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_213542_TTUQ1b1x1_205661_G4CNslke/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-33-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0010.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-28_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_213542_TTUQ1b1x1_205661_G4CNslke/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-33-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-33-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0010.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:19.516 +22:00:20.86 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-33-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0010.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-33-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
Image size: 941.8'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:05.984 +22:03:02.55 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:32:19.516 +22:00:20.86
Second-epoch image center 05:32:05.984 +22:03:02.55
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0689 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Image size: 941.8'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:08.923 +22:03:14.37 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:32:19.516 +22:00:20.86
Second-epoch image center 05:32:08.923 +22:03:14.37
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0632 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:32:05.984 +22:03:02.55
Second-epoch second image center 05:32:08.923 +22:03:14.37
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01182 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits &> /tmp/tmp.FLPc4k3FiD
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits &> /tmp/tmp.CUNrfiNB1g
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-28_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_213542_TTUQ1b1x1_205661_G4CNslke/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-33-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0010.fits &> /tmp/tmp.OhDkgWGvSG
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-28_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_213542_TTUQ1b1x1_205661_G4CNslke/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-33-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-28_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_213542_TTUQ1b1x1_205661_G4CNslke/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011.fits &> /tmp/tmp.UUaWcd3mdZ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-28_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_213542_TTUQ1b1x1_205661_G4CNslke/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 149155 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.1101 to 91.6891 deg, Dec +16.3191 to +27.3626 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.1101 to 91.6891 deg, Dec 16.3191 to 27.3626 deg
Loaded 12382 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7632 out of 10495 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10495 out of 149155 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.751206
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.751206
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.42
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.33
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.33
Magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 149155 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.1101 to 91.6891 deg, Dec +16.3191 to +27.3626 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.1101 to 91.6891 deg, Dec 16.3191 to 27.3626 deg
Loaded 12382 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7632 out of 10495 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10495 out of 149155 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits via Tycho-2
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits (aperture=4.7)
Read 163013 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3382 to 91.9465 deg, Dec +16.4852 to +27.3055 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3382 to 91.9465 deg, Dec 16.4852 to 27.3055 deg
Loaded 12416 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7186 out of 10477 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10477 out of 163013 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits via Tycho-2
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 58 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits
1.8 pix Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
2.1 pix fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-33-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
2.1 pix fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits
1.8 pix wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits
15.4 mag. Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
13.9 mag. fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-33-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
13.9 mag. fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.9 (SNR ) 13.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.FLPc4k3FiD (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-28_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_213542_TTUQ1b1x1_205661_G4CNslke/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=40, blended=17632, passed=149115
Got 149115 stars (including 131220 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 149115 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 929 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 899 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 140067 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 930 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 140070 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 140068 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 927 stars left (next iteration limit 1020)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits -region wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.CUNrfiNB1g (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-28_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_213542_TTUQ1b1x1_205661_G4CNslke/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=51, blended=20219, passed=162962
Got 162962 stars (including 142457 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 162962 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 932 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 932 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 910 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 932 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 158432 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 932 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 932 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 158433 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 932 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 158434 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 932 stars left (next iteration limit 1025)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits -region wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.OhDkgWGvSG (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-28_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_213542_TTUQ1b1x1_205661_G4CNslke/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-28_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_213542_TTUQ1b1x1_205661_G4CNslke/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-33-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0010.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-28_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_213542_TTUQ1b1x1_205661_G4CNslke/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-33-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-28_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_213542_TTUQ1b1x1_205661_G4CNslke/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-33-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-28_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_213542_TTUQ1b1x1_205661_G4CNslke/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-33-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-28_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_213542_TTUQ1b1x1_205661_G4CNslke/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-33-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-28_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_213542_TTUQ1b1x1_205661_G4CNslke/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-33-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-33-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-33-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-33-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0010.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-33-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0010.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-33-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0010.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-33-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0010.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-33-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-28_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_213542_TTUQ1b1x1_205661_G4CNslke/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-33-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-33-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0010.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=12, blended=3739, passed=55564
Got 55564 stars (including 51722 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-33-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0010.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 55564 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 929 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 900 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 53489 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 929 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 926 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 53490 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 926 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 53489 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Excluding outliers - 926 stars left (next iteration limit 1019)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-33-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0010.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-33-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0010.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-28_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_213542_TTUQ1b1x1_205661_G4CNslke/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-33-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0010.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-33-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0010.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-33-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0010.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.UUaWcd3mdZ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-28_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_213542_TTUQ1b1x1_205661_G4CNslke/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-28_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_213542_TTUQ1b1x1_205661_G4CNslke/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-28_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_213542_TTUQ1b1x1_205661_G4CNslke/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-28_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_213542_TTUQ1b1x1_205661_G4CNslke/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-28_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_213542_TTUQ1b1x1_205661_G4CNslke/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-28_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_213542_TTUQ1b1x1_205661_G4CNslke/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-28_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_213542_TTUQ1b1x1_205661_G4CNslke/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-28_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_213542_TTUQ1b1x1_205661_G4CNslke/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=3418, passed=54175
Got 54175 stars (including 50658 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 54175 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 924 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 887 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51572 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 924 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51574 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51575 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Excluding outliers - 922 stars left (next iteration limit 1015)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-28_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_213542_TTUQ1b1x1_205661_G4CNslke/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-33-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-28_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_213542_TTUQ1b1x1_205661_G4CNslke/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-33-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-28_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_213542_TTUQ1b1x1_205661_G4CNslke/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out185814.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out185822.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out185832.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out185834.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out185840.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out185855.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out185858.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out185862.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out186539.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out186821.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out187295.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out186115.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out186202.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out186334.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out186538.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out186780.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out186952.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out187127.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 8s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185801_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 185801_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:15.83 +24:54:36.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185804_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 185804_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:39:22.51 +26:46:23.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185807_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 185807_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:42:34.38 +24:06:14.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185811_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 185811_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:38:16.68 +26:53:32.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185813_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 185813_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:51:36.61 +20:06:33.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185814_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 185814_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:43.95 +17:21:46.2 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.20, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.18)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185815_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 185815_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:28.50 +19:17:12.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185822_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 185822_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:27.38 +20:59:26.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.13, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.11)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.272 3402117129299450624 082.61432347770 +20.99093972359 13.4391 12.8559 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.272#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185823_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 185823_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:33:58.06 +22:41:51.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185830_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 185830_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:11:36.93 +21:10:57.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185832_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 185832_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:56:31.82 +17:14:17.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.92, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.90)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 4.110 3349817961073358336 089.13196850741 +17.23917360634 12.3849 11.5091 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#4.110#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185834_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 185834_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:53:15.56 +17:46:25.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.96, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.94)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.925 3350075354172355584 088.31435953190 +17.77442573361 12.8135 12.3629 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.925#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185840_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 185840_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:02:06.01 +23:19:53.1 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.80, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.78)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185841_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 185841_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:44:57.39 +21:51:58.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185854_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 185854_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:56:18.87 +16:51:23.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185855_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 185855_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:45:07.26 +21:05:47.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.29, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.27)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.679 3400066329659856512 086.28033114160 +21.09709901630 12.3297 11.6589 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.679#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185857_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 185857_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:03.49 +24:19:50.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185858_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 185858_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:01:41.50 +16:57:53.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.18, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.16)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.423 3349355650793620736 090.42327903366 +16.96453223120 12.3827 12.0132 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.423#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185861_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 185861_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:57:19.64 +19:56:31.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185862_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 185862_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:47:30.17 +23:13:16.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.06, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.04)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.357 3427563225684665344 086.87641633697 +23.22118372730 11.5664 10.5806 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.357#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186115_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011
Preparing report for the candidate 186115_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186136_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 186136_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:34:45.31 +27:04:56.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186154_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 186154_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:56.06 +22:38:54.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186173_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 186173_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:17.03 +17:02:02.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186202_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011
Preparing report for the candidate 186202_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186277_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 186277_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:01:14.31 +23:18:08.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186334_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011
Preparing report for the candidate 186334_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186421_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 186421_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:45:36.80 +25:05:44.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186432_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 186432_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:43:00.29 +18:59:08.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186534_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 186534_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:05:06.78 +23:48:50.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186538_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011
Preparing report for the candidate 186538_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186539_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 186539_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:05:26.44 +23:41:59.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.57, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.55)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.321 3418502528315193984 076.35996211822 +23.70014881195 12.2460 11.5926 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.321#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186567_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 186567_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:03:16.74 +24:13:10.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186609_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 186609_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:51:30.84 +18:25:27.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186610_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 186610_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:39:37.23 +18:52:55.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186622_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 186622_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:33:38.29 +18:33:23.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186634_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 186634_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:57:56.04 +24:36:40.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186668_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 186668_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:31:10.94 +20:10:04.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186694_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 186694_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:45:11.25 +18:40:42.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186735_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 186735_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:20:11.73 +19:34:16.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186764_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 186764_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:54:57.44 +19:43:35.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186770_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 186770_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:02:21.36 +26:25:44.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186780_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011
Preparing report for the candidate 186780_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186821_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 186821_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:36.52 +17:26:35.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.81, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.79)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.826 3395050980383824256 077.65223077141 +17.44386596976 12.7691 12.1987 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.826#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186878_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 186878_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:08:24.70 +22:03:40.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186884_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 186884_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:28:32.23 +22:45:15.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186895_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 186895_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:58:38.39 +20:44:21.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186910_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 186910_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:29:17.10 +18:20:15.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186912_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 186912_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:02.98 +18:33:57.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186922_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 186922_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:44:42.25 +23:00:05.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186941_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 186941_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:01.75 +26:45:54.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186952_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011
Preparing report for the candidate 186952_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 187127_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011
Preparing report for the candidate 187127_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 187295_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 187295_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:38:05.78 +24:11:58.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.61, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.59)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.219 3404696171260929408 084.52407485511 +24.19952311698 13.6047 12.9860 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.219#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 187328_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 187328_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:40:50.19 +25:14:06.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162564_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 162564_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:08:16.83 +21:56:43.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 15870_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 15870_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:56.44 +17:54:32.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 47289_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 47289_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-28_21-34-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
