This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225627_TTUQ1b1x1_1091400_JJ9YbeLn
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 04 28.1632 2461158.6632 7.35 07:18:54.42 +22:35:24.9
195.28873 15.86739 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 8.4 pix This object is listed in moons.txt 89.4" Io (5.8mag)
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.2.7" Jupiter (-2.0mag)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:18:54.42 +22:35:24.9: 15.78 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:18:54.42 +22:35:24.9: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461158.6632,7.35,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260428.1632 7.35CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 04 28.1632 2461158.6632 7.94 07:18:54.46 +22:35:24.9
195.28879 15.86753 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.5" and 8.3 pix This object is listed in moons.txt 89.9" Io (5.8mag)
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.3.2" Jupiter (-2.0mag)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:18:54.46 +22:35:24.9: 16.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:18:54.46 +22:35:24.9: 16.24 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461158.6632,7.94,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260428.1632 7.94CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 04 28.1632 2461158.6632 13.18 06:58:17.87 +22:34:19.0
193.31238 11.51480 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.5" and 8.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.17 Thetis 2 1 2 13.4 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 06:58:17.87 +22:34:19.0: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 06:58:17.87 +22:34:19.0: 15.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461158.6632,13.18,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260428.1632 13.18CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 04 28.1632 2461158.6632 13.46 07:16:50.42 +24:01:02.2
193.73024 15.99249 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.5" and 8.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.200 Dynamene 2 1 2 13.8 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:16:50.42 +24:01:02.2: 16.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:16:50.42 +24:01:02.2: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461158.6632,13.46,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260428.1632 13.46CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 04 28.1632 2461158.6632 13.69 07:10:42.16 +18:13:08.6
198.59627 12.32992 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 8.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.34 Circe 2 1 2 13.8 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:10:42.16 +18:13:08.6: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:10:42.16 +18:13:08.6: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461158.6632,13.69,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260428.1632 13.69CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 04 28.1632 2461158.6632 14.15 07:21:00.71 +23:43:09.9
194.40352 16.75470 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 8.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.133 Cyrene 2 0 2 14.2 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:21:00.71 +23:43:09.9: 16.07 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:21:00.71 +23:43:09.9: 16.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461158.6632,14.15,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260428.1632 14.15CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 04 28.1632 2461158.6632 14.16 07:20:32.41 +21:11:46.3
196.77446 15.66136 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 8.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.206 Hersilia 2 2 2 14.3 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:20:32.41 +21:11:46.3: 16.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:20:32.41 +21:11:46.3: 16.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461158.6632,14.16,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260428.1632 14.16CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461158.6632,11.71,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260428.1632 11.71CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.73760365 18.01.2026 05:41:58.955 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
First image: 2461058.73760365 18.01.2026 05:41:58.955 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Last image: 2461158.66364280 28.04.2026 03:55:28.738 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225627_TTUQ1b1x1_1091400_JJ9YbeLn/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 4
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.62
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 7 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 20923
Objects passed selection criteria: 20857
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 16115
Average stars matched: 15258 (94.682 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 125696 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Apr 21 18:08:25 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-27-g1ba0f777
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-21)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Apr 27 22:59:43 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.73760365 18.01.2026 05:41:58.955 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
First image: 2461058.73760365 18.01.2026 05:41:58.955 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Last image: 2461158.66364280 28.04.2026 03:55:28.738 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225627_TTUQ1b1x1_1091400_JJ9YbeLn/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 165
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.32
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 58 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 137373
Objects passed selection criteria: 137033
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 112692
Average stars matched: 107682 (95.554 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1967396 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Apr 21 18:08:25 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-27-g1ba0f777
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-21)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Apr 27 23:04:13 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225627_TTUQ1b1x1_1091400_JJ9YbeLn/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-54-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225627_TTUQ1b1x1_1091400_JJ9YbeLn/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225627_TTUQ1b1x1_1091400_JJ9YbeLn/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-54-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225627_TTUQ1b1x1_1091400_JJ9YbeLn/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461158.66284628
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits'
wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits'
wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-54-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-54-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-54-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-54-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits'
wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:22:55.118 +21:59:39.20 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-54-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-54-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits
Image size: 941.6'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:08.165 +22:03:16.74 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:22:55.118 +21:59:39.20
Second-epoch image center 07:23:08.165 +22:03:16.74
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0787 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076.fits
Image size: 941.6'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:11.227 +22:03:45.10 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:22:55.118 +21:59:39.20
Second-epoch image center 07:23:11.227 +22:03:45.10
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0924 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:23:08.165 +22:03:16.74
Second-epoch second image center 07:23:11.227 +22:03:45.10
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01421 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits &> /tmp/tmp.HSHXoVfD1s
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits &> /tmp/tmp.rO6pz07sRL
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225627_TTUQ1b1x1_1091400_JJ9YbeLn/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-54-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits &> /tmp/tmp.nayq3HwEQC
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225627_TTUQ1b1x1_1091400_JJ9YbeLn/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-54-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225627_TTUQ1b1x1_1091400_JJ9YbeLn/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076.fits &> /tmp/tmp.rIDybwWjkQ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225627_TTUQ1b1x1_1091400_JJ9YbeLn/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 22550 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 101.7556 to 119.3352 deg, Dec +16.3006 to +27.3458 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 101.7556 to 119.3352 deg, Dec 16.3006 to 27.3458 deg
Loaded 14532 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10648 out of 11733 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11733 out of 22550 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.883687
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.883687
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.62
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.26
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.26
Magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 22550 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 101.7556 to 119.3352 deg, Dec +16.3006 to +27.3458 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 101.7556 to 119.3352 deg, Dec 16.3006 to 27.3458 deg
Loaded 14532 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10648 out of 11733 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11733 out of 22550 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits via Tycho-2
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits (aperture=6.2)
Read 23656 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 102.0351 to 119.5904 deg, Dec +16.4807 to +27.2946 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 102.0351 to 119.5904 deg, Dec 16.4807 to 27.2946 deg
Loaded 13969 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10670 out of 11761 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11761 out of 23656 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits via Tycho-2
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits (aperture=6.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 2 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
2.3 pix Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
2.3 pix fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-54-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits
2.3 pix fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
15.3 mag. Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-54-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.2 (SNR ) 11.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.HSHXoVfD1s (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225627_TTUQ1b1x1_1091400_JJ9YbeLn/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2218, passed=22550
Got 22550 stars (including 20300 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 22550 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 954 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 941 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22225 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 954 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22223 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22223 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 953 stars left (next iteration limit 1048)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits -region wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.rO6pz07sRL (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225627_TTUQ1b1x1_1091400_JJ9YbeLn/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2265, passed=23656
Got 23656 stars (including 21362 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 23656 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 951 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 930 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22858 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 952 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22857 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22857 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 950 stars left (next iteration limit 1045)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits -region wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.nayq3HwEQC (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225627_TTUQ1b1x1_1091400_JJ9YbeLn/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225627_TTUQ1b1x1_1091400_JJ9YbeLn/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-54-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225627_TTUQ1b1x1_1091400_JJ9YbeLn/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-54-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225627_TTUQ1b1x1_1091400_JJ9YbeLn/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-54-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225627_TTUQ1b1x1_1091400_JJ9YbeLn/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-54-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225627_TTUQ1b1x1_1091400_JJ9YbeLn/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-54-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225627_TTUQ1b1x1_1091400_JJ9YbeLn/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-54-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-54-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-54-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-54-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-54-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-54-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-54-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-54-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225627_TTUQ1b1x1_1091400_JJ9YbeLn/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-54-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-54-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=746, passed=9369
Got 9369 stars (including 8607 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-54-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9369 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 922 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9193 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9193 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9193 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 938 stars left (next iteration limit 1032)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-54-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-54-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225627_TTUQ1b1x1_1091400_JJ9YbeLn/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-54-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-54-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-54-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.rIDybwWjkQ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225627_TTUQ1b1x1_1091400_JJ9YbeLn/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225627_TTUQ1b1x1_1091400_JJ9YbeLn/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225627_TTUQ1b1x1_1091400_JJ9YbeLn/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225627_TTUQ1b1x1_1091400_JJ9YbeLn/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225627_TTUQ1b1x1_1091400_JJ9YbeLn/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225627_TTUQ1b1x1_1091400_JJ9YbeLn/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225627_TTUQ1b1x1_1091400_JJ9YbeLn/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225627_TTUQ1b1x1_1091400_JJ9YbeLn/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=759, passed=9305
Got 9305 stars (including 8535 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9305 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 919 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9117 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9117 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9117 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 939 stars left (next iteration limit 1032)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225627_TTUQ1b1x1_1091400_JJ9YbeLn/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-54-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-54-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225627_TTUQ1b1x1_1091400_JJ9YbeLn/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-54-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225627_TTUQ1b1x1_1091400_JJ9YbeLn/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 3s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33131_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076
Preparing report for the candidate 33131_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14622_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076
The candidate 14622_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:43:02.42 +23:26:57.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 4s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Gem-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225627_TTUQ1b1x1_1091400_JJ9YbeLn/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-54-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225627_TTUQ1b1x1_1091400_JJ9YbeLn/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225627_TTUQ1b1x1_1091400_JJ9YbeLn/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-54-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225627_TTUQ1b1x1_1091400_JJ9YbeLn/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-54-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-54-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:22:55.118 +21:59:39.20 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-54-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-54-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits
Image size: 941.6'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:08.165 +22:03:16.74 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:22:55.118 +21:59:39.20
Second-epoch image center 07:23:08.165 +22:03:16.74
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0787 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076.fits
Image size: 941.6'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:11.227 +22:03:45.10 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:22:55.118 +21:59:39.20
Second-epoch image center 07:23:11.227 +22:03:45.10
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0924 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:23:08.165 +22:03:16.74
Second-epoch second image center 07:23:11.227 +22:03:45.10
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01421 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits &> /tmp/tmp.47emK82HxV
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits &> /tmp/tmp.jf59GdnjEx
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225627_TTUQ1b1x1_1091400_JJ9YbeLn/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-54-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits &> /tmp/tmp.qx2JsHr3LC
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225627_TTUQ1b1x1_1091400_JJ9YbeLn/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-54-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225627_TTUQ1b1x1_1091400_JJ9YbeLn/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076.fits &> /tmp/tmp.6hgb2LOAIS
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225627_TTUQ1b1x1_1091400_JJ9YbeLn/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 153680 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 101.7461 to 119.3352 deg, Dec +16.3007 to +27.3487 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 101.7461 to 119.3352 deg, Dec 16.3007 to 27.3487 deg
Loaded 14554 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8811 out of 12036 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12036 out of 153680 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.739001
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.739001
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.32
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.42
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.42
Magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 153680 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 101.7461 to 119.3352 deg, Dec +16.3007 to +27.3487 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 101.7461 to 119.3352 deg, Dec 16.3007 to 27.3487 deg
Loaded 14554 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8811 out of 12036 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12036 out of 153680 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits via Tycho-2
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits (aperture=4.7)
Read 151496 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 102.0337 to 119.6237 deg, Dec +16.4751 to +27.2973 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 102.0337 to 119.6237 deg, Dec 16.4751 to 27.2973 deg
Loaded 14001 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8799 out of 12010 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12010 out of 151496 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits via Tycho-2
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits (aperture=4.8)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 148 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
2.1 pix Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
2.1 pix fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-54-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits
2.1 pix fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076.fits
1.9 pix wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
15.4 mag. Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-54-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits
14.3 mag. fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.3 (SNR ) 13.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.47emK82HxV (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225627_TTUQ1b1x1_1091400_JJ9YbeLn/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=51, blended=17863, passed=153629
Got 153629 stars (including 135492 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 153629 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 941 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 151026 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 151027 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 151027 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 953 stars left (next iteration limit 1048)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits -region wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.jf59GdnjEx (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225627_TTUQ1b1x1_1091400_JJ9YbeLn/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=46, blended=17705, passed=151450
Got 151450 stars (including 133487 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 151450 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 952 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 935 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 148360 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 952 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 951 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 148361 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 951 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 148362 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 951 stars left (next iteration limit 1047)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits -region wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.qx2JsHr3LC (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225627_TTUQ1b1x1_1091400_JJ9YbeLn/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225627_TTUQ1b1x1_1091400_JJ9YbeLn/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-54-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225627_TTUQ1b1x1_1091400_JJ9YbeLn/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-54-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225627_TTUQ1b1x1_1091400_JJ9YbeLn/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-54-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225627_TTUQ1b1x1_1091400_JJ9YbeLn/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-54-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225627_TTUQ1b1x1_1091400_JJ9YbeLn/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-54-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225627_TTUQ1b1x1_1091400_JJ9YbeLn/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-54-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-54-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-54-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-54-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-54-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-54-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-54-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-54-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225627_TTUQ1b1x1_1091400_JJ9YbeLn/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-54-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-54-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=1, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=20, blended=3992, passed=74293
Got 74293 stars (including 70175 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-54-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 74293 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 915 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 73059 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 73060 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 73060 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 939 stars left (next iteration limit 1032)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-54-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-54-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225627_TTUQ1b1x1_1091400_JJ9YbeLn/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-54-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-54-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-54-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.6hgb2LOAIS (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225627_TTUQ1b1x1_1091400_JJ9YbeLn/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225627_TTUQ1b1x1_1091400_JJ9YbeLn/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225627_TTUQ1b1x1_1091400_JJ9YbeLn/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225627_TTUQ1b1x1_1091400_JJ9YbeLn/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225627_TTUQ1b1x1_1091400_JJ9YbeLn/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225627_TTUQ1b1x1_1091400_JJ9YbeLn/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225627_TTUQ1b1x1_1091400_JJ9YbeLn/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225627_TTUQ1b1x1_1091400_JJ9YbeLn/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=18, blended=4018, passed=74435
Got 74435 stars (including 70280 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 74435 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 920 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 73253 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 73253 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 73253 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 941 stars left (next iteration limit 1035)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225627_TTUQ1b1x1_1091400_JJ9YbeLn/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-54-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225627_TTUQ1b1x1_1091400_JJ9YbeLn/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-54-19_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225627_TTUQ1b1x1_1091400_JJ9YbeLn/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out164419.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out181119.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out181131.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out181134.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out181140.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out181143.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out181146.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out181157.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out181162.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out181169.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out182415.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out182536.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out182732.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out182817.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out182880.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out182952.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out183012.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out183020.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out183037.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out183081.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out183154.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out135632.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out182105.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out182603.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out182767.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out183141.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out183165.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 18s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 6s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181119_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076
The candidate 181119_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:15:13.24 +25:40:40.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.09, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.07)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.834 871189727507323136 108.80576658789 +25.67728891048 14.8744 14.2906 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.834#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181125_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076
The candidate 181125_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:15:07.08 +20:41:21.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181131_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076
The candidate 181131_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:21:05.20 +21:26:55.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.98, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.96)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.821 3364099350105310848 110.27112625241 +21.44880805926 14.1104 13.6766 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.821#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181132_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076
The candidate 181132_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181134_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076
The candidate 181134_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:13:01.40 +20:29:32.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.89, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.87)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.482 3363618416847155072 108.25535707962 +20.49172424741 13.9769 13.3953 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.482#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181136_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076
The candidate 181136_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:01:19.47 +25:01:06.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181140_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076
The candidate 181140_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:15:11.95 +25:20:55.9 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.72, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.70)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181141_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076
The candidate 181141_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:48:11.84 +22:35:36.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181143_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076
The candidate 181143_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:19:34.99 +22:19:34.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.55, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.53)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.285 869206895727151872 109.89520240449 +22.32584170537 13.7110 13.3131 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.285#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181146_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076
The candidate 181146_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:14:13.24 +23:10:38.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.42, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.40)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.918 869552657774203776 108.55473989802 +23.17688963550 13.4961 13.0619 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.918#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181148_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076
The candidate 181148_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:26.63 +25:01:09.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181150_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076
The candidate 181150_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:08:21.40 +24:30:48.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181153_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076
The candidate 181153_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076 did not pass the final checks
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:08:21.14 +18:46:57.1: 13.37 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:08:21.14 +18:46:57.1: 13.21 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.28 +/- 0.02
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181154_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076
The candidate 181154_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:36:44.89 +21:03:19.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181155_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076
The candidate 181155_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:16:10.54 +24:13:25.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181157_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076
The candidate 181157_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:55:27.12 +23:44:56.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.07, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.05)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 5.842 675250708124924288 118.86123226036 +23.74882098527 13.1481 12.3946 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#5.842#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181158_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076
The candidate 181158_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:58:55.83 +26:11:01.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181159_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076
The candidate 181159_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:25.83 +22:06:41.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181162_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076
The candidate 181162_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:31:36.09 +20:51:43.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.92, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.90)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.077 864931169884080000 112.89982834999 +20.86232402246 13.2132 12.6558 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.077#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181163_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076
The candidate 181163_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:53:12.82 +21:35:37.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181167_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076
The candidate 181167_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:57:06.84 +20:04:18.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181169_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076
The candidate 181169_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:00.11 +19:41:41.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.71, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.69)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.326 3365002495828550400 106.25026857562 +19.69465022989 12.4659 11.7955 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.326#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181170_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076
The candidate 181170_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:23.34 +22:16:51.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181173_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076
Preparing report for the candidate 181173_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181204_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076
The candidate 181204_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:49:59.80 +26:32:16.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181207_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076
The candidate 181207_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:53:21.50 +25:27:28.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181284_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076
The candidate 181284_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:50:01.44 +26:33:37.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181504_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076
The candidate 181504_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:52:40.82 +25:46:42.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181541_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076
The candidate 181541_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:58:38.70 +19:12:53.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181555_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076
The candidate 181555_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:25.20 +22:38:51.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181575_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076
The candidate 181575_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:43:57.77 +25:46:40.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181666_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076
The candidate 181666_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:52:45.03 +25:42:34.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181675_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076
The candidate 181675_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:58:40.94 +19:13:21.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181701_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076
The candidate 181701_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:43:14.52 +22:23:12.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181751_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076
The candidate 181751_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:01:48.21 +17:59:36.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181772_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076
The candidate 181772_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:53:38.31 +25:21:12.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181802_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076
The candidate 181802_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181805_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076
The candidate 181805_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:50:11.95 +26:29:58.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181823_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076
The candidate 181823_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:25.39 +25:56:21.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181833_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076
The candidate 181833_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:58:51.29 +25:39:59.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181850_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076
The candidate 181850_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:51:54.28 +23:37:26.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181855_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076
The candidate 181855_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:53:53.90 +24:48:38.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181865_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076
The candidate 181865_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:56:53.95 +20:58:51.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181866_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076
The candidate 181866_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:19.15 +25:55:37.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181867_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076
The candidate 181867_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:52:34.56 +25:43:46.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181895_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076
The candidate 181895_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:37.40 +26:03:27.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181932_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076
The candidate 181932_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:37.08 +17:45:38.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181957_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076
The candidate 181957_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:42.48 +21:18:41.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181961_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076
The candidate 181961_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:55:34.48 +25:05:54.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181994_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076
The candidate 181994_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:32:08.87 +23:56:52.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182009_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076
The candidate 182009_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:11:46.32 +26:38:06.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182012_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076
The candidate 182012_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:33.06 +24:41:32.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182013_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076
The candidate 182013_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:55:39.97 +24:42:21.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182016_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076
The candidate 182016_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:15.40 +21:47:42.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182017_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076
The candidate 182017_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:04:06.51 +18:39:22.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182025_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076
The candidate 182025_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:11:55.69 +22:17:42.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182043_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076
The candidate 182043_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:52:02.29 +26:11:51.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182065_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076
The candidate 182065_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:50.89 +18:51:18.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182105_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076
Preparing report for the candidate 182105_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182106_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076
The candidate 182106_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:31:54.35 +24:32:04.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182118_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076
The candidate 182118_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:19.39 +22:04:40.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182130_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076
The candidate 182130_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:55:35.44 +24:41:06.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182133_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076
The candidate 182133_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:01:49.19 +22:03:01.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182140_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076
The candidate 182140_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:50:42.85 +23:41:36.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182144_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076
The candidate 182144_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:22.50 +20:30:18.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182154_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076
The candidate 182154_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:45.89 +23:26:51.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182160_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076
The candidate 182160_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:50:27.51 +26:21:09.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182244_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076
The candidate 182244_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:03:06.19 +25:37:20.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182245_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076
The candidate 182245_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:11:03.04 +18:51:17.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182266_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076
The candidate 182266_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:48:28.48 +18:20:30.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182273_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076
The candidate 182273_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:55.47 +21:31:10.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182274_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076
The candidate 182274_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:35:49.62 +24:54:16.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182277_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076
The candidate 182277_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:38:19.62 +21:35:21.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182281_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076
The candidate 182281_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076 did not pass the final checks
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:38:24.35 +21:34:54.2: 13.37 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:38:24.35 +21:34:54.2: 13.33 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.35 +/- 0.05
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182282_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076
The candidate 182282_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:50:34.56 +26:20:37.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182286_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076
The candidate 182286_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:10:36.75 +19:19:52.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182295_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076
The candidate 182295_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:55:27.44 +25:34:20.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182307_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076
The candidate 182307_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:55:13.77 +24:40:53.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182332_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076
The candidate 182332_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:51:05.04 +26:16:06.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182359_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076
The candidate 182359_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:49.75 +26:19:05.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182361_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076
The candidate 182361_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:51:43.36 +26:01:25.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182371_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076
The candidate 182371_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:11.06 +20:06:31.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182376_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076
The candidate 182376_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:42:53.20 +24:07:52.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182379_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076
The candidate 182379_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:51:12.94 +20:54:01.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182380_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076
The candidate 182380_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:31:50.04 +17:03:20.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182382_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076
The candidate 182382_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:50:44.81 +24:54:25.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182386_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076
The candidate 182386_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:19:45.65 +20:26:52.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182387_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076
The candidate 182387_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:41:33.26 +18:14:37.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182401_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076
The candidate 182401_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:53:06.97 +25:33:49.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182415_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076
The candidate 182415_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:55:52.25 +23:58:52.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.38, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.36)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.060 681262768985868032 118.96772986501 +23.98165500340 13.4671 12.9723 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.060#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182419_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076
The candidate 182419_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:51:23.26 +25:59:52.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182443_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076
The candidate 182443_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:00.32 +17:19:18.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182456_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076
The candidate 182456_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:51:00.41 +20:48:37.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182462_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076
The candidate 182462_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:25:02.80 +19:56:33.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182477_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076
The candidate 182477_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:16:11.13 +24:39:06.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182479_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076
The candidate 182479_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:20:30.53 +20:05:40.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182484_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076
The candidate 182484_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:58:49.12 +25:18:27.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182510_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076
The candidate 182510_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:05.94 +23:59:42.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182518_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076
The candidate 182518_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:31.40 +24:54:41.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182527_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076
The candidate 182527_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:51:13.05 +26:29:19.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182536_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076
The candidate 182536_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:30:18.54 +18:26:49.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.65, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.63)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 4.331 3170400718804868608 112.57743118940 +18.44586497826 14.4608 13.6551 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#4.331#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182551_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076
The candidate 182551_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:35.95 +24:19:33.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182565_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076
The candidate 182565_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:35:01.21 +23:54:51.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182575_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076
The candidate 182575_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:15:36.98 +26:28:54.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182598_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076
The candidate 182598_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:52.11 +20:05:35.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182603_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076
Preparing report for the candidate 182603_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182610_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076
The candidate 182610_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:22:30.36 +22:57:33.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182627_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076
The candidate 182627_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:16:47.90 +26:38:49.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182631_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076
The candidate 182631_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:55:39.24 +24:16:28.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182634_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076
The candidate 182634_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:14:40.71 +20:31:58.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182655_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076
The candidate 182655_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:27:24.66 +19:09:59.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182663_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076
The candidate 182663_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:38:21.54 +26:41:48.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182689_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076
The candidate 182689_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:27:03.74 +20:16:02.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182700_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076
The candidate 182700_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:51:48.83 +26:17:47.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182703_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076
The candidate 182703_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:15:41.07 +22:08:54.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182732_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076
The candidate 182732_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:37.96 +24:18:40.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.75, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.73)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.961 3380667542930120576 106.40759930797 +24.31096746395 13.8903 13.3964 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.961#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182739_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076
The candidate 182739_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:23:19.34 +20:37:09.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182749_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076
The candidate 182749_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:16:57.90 +26:41:53.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182767_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076
Preparing report for the candidate 182767_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182775_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076
The candidate 182775_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:22:13.67 +22:40:19.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182793_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076
The candidate 182793_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:08:49.05 +25:12:12.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182804_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076
The candidate 182804_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:19:55.88 +20:49:17.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182809_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076
The candidate 182809_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:40.74 +21:21:32.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182817_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076
The candidate 182817_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:36:44.29 +24:12:41.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.80, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.78)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 4.695 868138445302593408 114.18402452905 +24.21031186044 14.1789 13.4833 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#4.695#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182824_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076
The candidate 182824_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:49.50 +17:39:42.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182862_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076
The candidate 182862_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:54:40.71 +25:26:06.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182877_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076
The candidate 182877_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:26.56 +21:00:07.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182880_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076
The candidate 182880_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:18:01.42 +24:32:42.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.73, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.71)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.336 870506621551399296 109.50556947429 +24.54525046836 13.9816 13.4571 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.336#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182896_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076
The candidate 182896_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:28.81 +25:50:23.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182929_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076
The candidate 182929_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:50:18.29 +26:33:19.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182944_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076
The candidate 182944_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:51:44.54 +25:43:34.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182952_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076
The candidate 182952_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:28.70 +23:06:52.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.84, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.82)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.731 869513212794828160 109.36956691496 +23.11379713787 14.0814 13.6204 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.731#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182982_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076
The candidate 182982_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:11:01.62 +18:18:04.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183012_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076
The candidate 183012_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:11:58.71 +23:24:37.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.98, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.96)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.360 3368332676031340672 107.99467157015 +23.40998562807 14.1317 13.7057 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.360#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183020_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076
The candidate 183020_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:15:16.59 +20:14:19.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.98, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.96)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.383 3363537911980288384 108.81889838013 +20.23812312883 14.1220 13.5398 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.383#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183037_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076
The candidate 183037_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:08:29.78 +21:58:28.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.04, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.02)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.761 3367375585518463104 107.12358199460 +21.97361994326 14.2410 13.8516 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.761#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183079_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076
The candidate 183079_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:21:09.99 +26:30:51.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183081_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076
The candidate 183081_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:29:49.24 +20:17:54.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.24, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.22)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.995 864802149066906880 112.45435251691 +20.29805871620 14.2442 13.6152 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.995#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183141_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076
Preparing report for the candidate 183141_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183154_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076
The candidate 183154_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:18:26.38 +21:34:47.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.11, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.09)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.343 3364159995043380736 109.60948543565 +21.57923738302 14.3748 13.9486 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.343#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183163_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076
The candidate 183163_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:20:30.16 +22:26:09.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183165_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076
Preparing report for the candidate 183165_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183168_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076
The candidate 183168_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:15:56.92 +22:00:58.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 164419_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076
The candidate 164419_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:48:52.86 +25:41:36.4 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.93, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.91)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102023_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076
The candidate 102023_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:43:02.42 +23:26:57.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 135632_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076
Preparing report for the candidate 135632_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170726_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076
The candidate 170726_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:52:15.82 +25:46:19.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119081_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076
The candidate 119081_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-55-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0076 did not pass the final checks
