This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_222951_TTUQ2b1x1_322871_uRXkOIkg
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 04 28.1451 2461158.6451 7.21 07:18:54.03 +22:35:23.2
195.28857 15.86582 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 1.7 pix This object is listed in moons.txt 95.9" Io (5.8mag)
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.5.4" Jupiter (-2.0mag)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:18:54.03 +22:35:23.2: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:18:54.03 +22:35:23.2: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461158.6451,7.21,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260428.1451 7.21CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 04 28.1451 2461158.6451 7.76 07:18:54.00 +22:35:23.5
195.28844 15.86575 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 1.7 pix This object is listed in moons.txt 95.4" Io (5.8mag)
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.4.9" Jupiter (-2.0mag)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:18:54.00 +22:35:23.5: 16.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:18:54.00 +22:35:23.5: 16.27 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461158.6451,7.76,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260428.1451 7.76CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 04 28.1451 2461158.6451 13.48 07:16:48.84 +24:01:06.6
193.72662 15.98744 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 1.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.200 Dynamene 1 0 1 13.8 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:16:48.84 +24:01:06.6: 16.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:16:48.84 +24:01:06.6: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461158.6451,13.48,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260428.1451 13.48CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 04 28.1451 2461158.6451 13.69 07:10:40.42 +18:13:09.0
198.59321 12.32371 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 1.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.34 Circe 0 1 1 13.8 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:10:40.42 +18:13:09.0: 15.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:10:40.42 +18:13:09.0: 15.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461158.6451,13.69,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260428.1451 13.69CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 04 28.1451 2461158.6451 14.10 07:20:59.45 +23:43:12.5
194.40088 16.75055 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 1.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.133 Cyrene -1 -1 1 14.2 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:20:59.45 +23:43:12.5: 16.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:20:59.45 +23:43:12.5: 16.16 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461158.6451,14.10,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260428.1451 14.10CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 04 28.1451 2461158.6451 14.21 07:20:30.98 +21:11:46.2
196.77219 15.65625 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 1.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.206 Hersilia 2 0 2 14.3 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:20:30.98 +21:11:46.2: 16.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:20:30.98 +21:11:46.2: 16.17 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461158.6451,14.21,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260428.1451 14.21CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.73760365 18.01.2026 05:41:58.955 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
First image: 2461058.73760365 18.01.2026 05:41:58.955 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Last image: 2461158.64535375 28.04.2026 03:29:08.564 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_222951_TTUQ2b1x1_322871_uRXkOIkg/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 3
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.60
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 12971
Objects passed selection criteria: 12926
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 12233.5
Average stars matched: 11079 (90.5628 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 122664 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Apr 21 18:08:25 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-27-g1ba0f777
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-21)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Apr 27 22:33:19 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.73760365 18.01.2026 05:41:58.955 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
First image: 2461058.73760365 18.01.2026 05:41:58.955 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Last image: 2461158.64535375 28.04.2026 03:29:08.564 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_222951_TTUQ2b1x1_322871_uRXkOIkg/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 76
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.28
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 37 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 89511
Objects passed selection criteria: 89318
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 86044.2
Average stars matched: 77987.5 (90.6365 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1893868 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Apr 21 18:08:25 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-27-g1ba0f777
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-21)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Apr 27 22:36:09 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_222951_TTUQ2b1x1_322871_uRXkOIkg/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-28-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_222951_TTUQ2b1x1_322871_uRXkOIkg/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_222951_TTUQ2b1x1_322871_uRXkOIkg/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-28-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_222951_TTUQ2b1x1_322871_uRXkOIkg/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461158.64484875
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits'
wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits'
wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-28-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-28-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-28-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-28-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits'
wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:22:55.118 +21:59:39.20 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-28-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-28-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:12.012 +22:00:00.79 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:22:55.118 +21:59:39.20
Second-epoch image center 07:23:12.012 +22:00:00.79
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0655 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:12.160 +21:59:50.87 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:22:55.118 +21:59:39.20
Second-epoch image center 07:23:12.160 +21:59:50.87
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0659 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:23:12.012 +22:00:00.79
Second-epoch second image center 07:23:12.160 +21:59:50.87
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00281 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits &> /tmp/tmp.mO7DBKrzcP
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits &> /tmp/tmp.40LgJUuXhN
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_222951_TTUQ2b1x1_322871_uRXkOIkg/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-28-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits &> /tmp/tmp.JZLKGIsEQA
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_222951_TTUQ2b1x1_322871_uRXkOIkg/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-28-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_222951_TTUQ2b1x1_322871_uRXkOIkg/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ufjJAybZyn
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_222951_TTUQ2b1x1_322871_uRXkOIkg/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 22550 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 101.7556 to 119.3352 deg, Dec +16.3006 to +27.3458 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 101.7556 to 119.3352 deg, Dec 16.3006 to 27.3458 deg
Loaded 14532 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10648 out of 11733 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11733 out of 22550 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.876863
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.876863
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.60
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.28
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.28
Magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 22550 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 101.7556 to 119.3352 deg, Dec +16.3006 to +27.3458 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 101.7556 to 119.3352 deg, Dec 16.3006 to 27.3458 deg
Loaded 14532 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10648 out of 11733 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11733 out of 22550 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits via Tycho-2
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits (aperture=6.1)
Read 23656 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 102.0351 to 119.5904 deg, Dec +16.4807 to +27.2946 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 102.0351 to 119.5904 deg, Dec 16.4807 to 27.2946 deg
Loaded 13969 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10670 out of 11761 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11761 out of 23656 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits via Tycho-2
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 2 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
2.3 pix Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
2.6 pix fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-28-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits
2.6 pix fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
15.3 mag. Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-28-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.2 (SNR ) 11.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.mO7DBKrzcP (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_222951_TTUQ2b1x1_322871_uRXkOIkg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2218, passed=22550
Got 22550 stars (including 20300 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 22550 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 954 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 941 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22225 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 954 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22223 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22223 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 953 stars left (next iteration limit 1048)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits -region wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.40LgJUuXhN (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_222951_TTUQ2b1x1_322871_uRXkOIkg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2265, passed=23656
Got 23656 stars (including 21362 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 23656 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 951 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 930 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22858 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 952 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22858 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22858 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 949 stars left (next iteration limit 1045)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits -region wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.JZLKGIsEQA (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_222951_TTUQ2b1x1_322871_uRXkOIkg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_222951_TTUQ2b1x1_322871_uRXkOIkg/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-28-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_222951_TTUQ2b1x1_322871_uRXkOIkg/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-28-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_222951_TTUQ2b1x1_322871_uRXkOIkg/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-28-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_222951_TTUQ2b1x1_322871_uRXkOIkg/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-28-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_222951_TTUQ2b1x1_322871_uRXkOIkg/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-28-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_222951_TTUQ2b1x1_322871_uRXkOIkg/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-28-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-28-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-28-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-28-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-28-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-28-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-28-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-28-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_222951_TTUQ2b1x1_322871_uRXkOIkg/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-28-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-28-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=703, passed=10219
Got 10219 stars (including 9506 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-28-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10219 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 923 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10064 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.62"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10062 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.62"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10062 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.68"
Excluding outliers - 938 stars left (next iteration limit 1031)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-28-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-28-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_222951_TTUQ2b1x1_322871_uRXkOIkg/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-28-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-28-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-28-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ufjJAybZyn (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_222951_TTUQ2b1x1_322871_uRXkOIkg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_222951_TTUQ2b1x1_322871_uRXkOIkg/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_222951_TTUQ2b1x1_322871_uRXkOIkg/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_222951_TTUQ2b1x1_322871_uRXkOIkg/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_222951_TTUQ2b1x1_322871_uRXkOIkg/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_222951_TTUQ2b1x1_322871_uRXkOIkg/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_222951_TTUQ2b1x1_322871_uRXkOIkg/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_222951_TTUQ2b1x1_322871_uRXkOIkg/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=706, passed=10240
Got 10240 stars (including 9525 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10240 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 930 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10075 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.62"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10075 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.63"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10075 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.70"
Excluding outliers - 942 stars left (next iteration limit 1036)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_222951_TTUQ2b1x1_322871_uRXkOIkg/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-28-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-28-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_222951_TTUQ2b1x1_322871_uRXkOIkg/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-28-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_222951_TTUQ2b1x1_322871_uRXkOIkg/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 4s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34568_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069
Preparing report for the candidate 34568_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30957_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069
The candidate 30957_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:43:02.39 +23:26:57.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 5s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Gem-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_222951_TTUQ2b1x1_322871_uRXkOIkg/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-28-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_222951_TTUQ2b1x1_322871_uRXkOIkg/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_222951_TTUQ2b1x1_322871_uRXkOIkg/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-28-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_222951_TTUQ2b1x1_322871_uRXkOIkg/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-28-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-28-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:22:55.118 +21:59:39.20 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-28-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-28-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:12.012 +22:00:00.79 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:22:55.118 +21:59:39.20
Second-epoch image center 07:23:12.012 +22:00:00.79
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0655 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069.fits
util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Image size: 937.3'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:12.160 +21:59:50.87 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:22:55.118 +21:59:39.20
Second-epoch image center 07:23:12.160 +21:59:50.87
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0659 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:23:12.012 +22:00:00.79
Second-epoch second image center 07:23:12.160 +21:59:50.87
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00281 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Mi8q4k8r1z
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits &> /tmp/tmp.WWX92zztt1
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_222951_TTUQ2b1x1_322871_uRXkOIkg/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-28-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Sa4uSA05jX
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_222951_TTUQ2b1x1_322871_uRXkOIkg/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-28-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_222951_TTUQ2b1x1_322871_uRXkOIkg/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069.fits &> /tmp/tmp.cbpymSE9Fv
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_222951_TTUQ2b1x1_322871_uRXkOIkg/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 153680 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 101.7461 to 119.3352 deg, Dec +16.3007 to +27.3487 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 101.7461 to 119.3352 deg, Dec 16.3007 to 27.3487 deg
Loaded 14554 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8811 out of 12036 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12036 out of 153680 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.726744
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.726744
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.28
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.45
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.45
Magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 153680 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 101.7461 to 119.3352 deg, Dec +16.3007 to +27.3487 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 101.7461 to 119.3352 deg, Dec 16.3007 to 27.3487 deg
Loaded 14554 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8811 out of 12036 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12036 out of 153680 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits via Tycho-2
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits (aperture=4.6)
Read 151496 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 102.0337 to 119.6237 deg, Dec +16.4751 to +27.2973 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 102.0337 to 119.6237 deg, Dec 16.4751 to 27.2973 deg
Loaded 14001 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8799 out of 12010 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12010 out of 151496 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits via Tycho-2
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits (aperture=4.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 62 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
2.1 pix Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
2.4 pix fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-28-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits
2.4 pix fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069.fits
1.9 pix wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
15.5 mag. Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
14.3 mag. fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-28-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits
14.3 mag. fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.3 (SNR ) 13.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.Mi8q4k8r1z (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_222951_TTUQ2b1x1_322871_uRXkOIkg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=36, blended=17863, passed=153644
Got 153644 stars (including 135507 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 153644 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 941 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 151041 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 151042 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 151042 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 953 stars left (next iteration limit 1048)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits -region wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.WWX92zztt1 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_222951_TTUQ2b1x1_322871_uRXkOIkg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=23, blended=17705, passed=151473
Got 151473 stars (including 133510 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 151473 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 954 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 937 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 148383 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 954 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 148381 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 148382 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 953 stars left (next iteration limit 1049)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits -region wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Sa4uSA05jX (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_222951_TTUQ2b1x1_322871_uRXkOIkg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_222951_TTUQ2b1x1_322871_uRXkOIkg/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-28-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_222951_TTUQ2b1x1_322871_uRXkOIkg/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-28-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_222951_TTUQ2b1x1_322871_uRXkOIkg/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-28-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_222951_TTUQ2b1x1_322871_uRXkOIkg/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-28-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_222951_TTUQ2b1x1_322871_uRXkOIkg/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-28-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_222951_TTUQ2b1x1_322871_uRXkOIkg/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-28-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-28-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-28-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-28-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-28-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-28-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-28-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-28-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_222951_TTUQ2b1x1_322871_uRXkOIkg/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-28-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-28-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=4251, passed=64299
Got 64299 stars (including 59972 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-28-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 64299 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 928 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 63401 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 63400 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 63400 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Excluding outliers - 942 stars left (next iteration limit 1037)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-28-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-28-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_222951_TTUQ2b1x1_322871_uRXkOIkg/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-28-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-28-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-28-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.cbpymSE9Fv (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_222951_TTUQ2b1x1_322871_uRXkOIkg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_222951_TTUQ2b1x1_322871_uRXkOIkg/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_222951_TTUQ2b1x1_322871_uRXkOIkg/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_222951_TTUQ2b1x1_322871_uRXkOIkg/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_222951_TTUQ2b1x1_322871_uRXkOIkg/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_222951_TTUQ2b1x1_322871_uRXkOIkg/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_222951_TTUQ2b1x1_322871_uRXkOIkg/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_222951_TTUQ2b1x1_322871_uRXkOIkg/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=4212, passed=64340
Got 64340 stars (including 60050 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 64340 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 928 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 63196 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 63199 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 63198 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Excluding outliers - 944 stars left (next iteration limit 1038)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_222951_TTUQ2b1x1_322871_uRXkOIkg/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-28-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_222951_TTUQ2b1x1_322871_uRXkOIkg/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-28-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_222951_TTUQ2b1x1_322871_uRXkOIkg/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out195466.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out195471.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out195479.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out195480.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out195644.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out195677.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out195738.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out195770.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out195817.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out49208.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out195726.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out195778.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out195808.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out195825.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 18s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195464_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069
The candidate 195464_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:18:22.83 +17:52:06.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195466_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069
The candidate 195466_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:40:04.90 +24:18:45.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.90, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.88)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.063 867494234568114944 115.02086759473 +24.31212856726 13.4570 12.4608 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.063#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195471_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069
The candidate 195471_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:32:33.86 +17:53:37.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.48, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.46)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.545 3170132579703698560 113.14119726502 +17.89374450193 13.5153 13.0515 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.545#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195479_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069
The candidate 195479_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:32.99 +24:41:32.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.79, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.77)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.619 870523526542670720 109.38742027068 +24.69177373727 13.0505 12.6468 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.619#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195480_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069
The candidate 195480_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:25:10.43 +18:37:44.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.72, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.70)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.144 3362517255952192000 111.29311880673 +18.62963993168 13.0963 12.4411 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.144#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195483_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069
Preparing report for the candidate 195483_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195537_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069
The candidate 195537_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:19.23 +24:07:15.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195545_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069
The candidate 195545_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:25.15 +22:38:50.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195559_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069
The candidate 195559_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195579_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069
The candidate 195579_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:25.36 +25:56:20.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195582_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069
The candidate 195582_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195587_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069
The candidate 195587_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:27:42.15 +22:10:17.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195594_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069
The candidate 195594_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:32:08.79 +23:56:52.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195598_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069
The candidate 195598_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:42.49 +21:18:41.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195607_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069
The candidate 195607_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:11:55.69 +22:17:42.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195624_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069
The candidate 195624_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:15.30 +21:47:41.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195628_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069
The candidate 195628_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:31:54.32 +24:32:03.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195629_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069
The candidate 195629_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:50.84 +18:51:18.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195630_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069
The candidate 195630_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:45.84 +23:15:03.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195632_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069
The candidate 195632_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:45.86 +25:33:04.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195634_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069
The candidate 195634_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:55.46 +21:31:09.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195644_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069
The candidate 195644_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:29:20.38 +24:26:17.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.16, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.14)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.161 866934033393052672 112.33456544079 +24.43823745495 13.3027 12.9327 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.161#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195649_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069
The candidate 195649_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:22.51 +20:30:18.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195655_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069
The candidate 195655_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:38:19.57 +21:35:20.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195675_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069
The candidate 195675_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:35:49.61 +24:54:16.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195677_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069
The candidate 195677_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:10:36.64 +19:19:52.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.35, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.33)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.362 3363374806302677760 107.65227194183 +19.33121108250 13.3349 12.6391 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.362#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195688_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069
The candidate 195688_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:11:03.14 +18:51:18.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195691_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069
The candidate 195691_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:20:30.44 +20:05:39.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195692_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069
The candidate 195692_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:16:11.09 +24:39:06.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195696_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069
The candidate 195696_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:14:40.64 +20:31:55.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195698_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069
The candidate 195698_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:41:33.22 +18:14:35.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195700_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069
The candidate 195700_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:34:29.78 +22:47:24.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195705_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069
The candidate 195705_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:18:50.47 +25:56:35.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195706_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069
The candidate 195706_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:20.22 +24:08:07.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195717_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069
The candidate 195717_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:27.70 +22:58:43.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195718_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069
The candidate 195718_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:19:45.57 +20:26:52.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195720_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069
The candidate 195720_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:35:19.08 +18:19:12.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195722_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069
The candidate 195722_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069 did not pass the final checks
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:07:31.72 +24:54:42.5: 13.49 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:07:31.72 +24:54:42.5: 13.49 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.49 +/- 0.04
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195724_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069
The candidate 195724_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:25:02.71 +19:56:33.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195725_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069
The candidate 195725_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:11.01 +20:06:30.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195726_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069
Preparing report for the candidate 195726_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195730_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069
The candidate 195730_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:19:55.78 +20:49:16.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195735_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069
The candidate 195735_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:28:38.96 +24:17:03.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195738_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069
The candidate 195738_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:22:30.31 +22:57:31.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.60, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.58)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.953 869346842941428608 110.62610948067 +22.95865621725 13.7173 13.2273 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.953#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195743_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069
The candidate 195743_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:35.83 +24:19:33.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195752_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069
The candidate 195752_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:27:24.62 +19:09:58.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195757_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069
The candidate 195757_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:22:13.61 +22:40:19.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195770_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069
The candidate 195770_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:21:47.91 +25:23:10.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.76, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.74)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.019 871025316161511552 110.44888516552 +25.38667327740 13.8314 13.2100 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.019#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195778_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069
Preparing report for the candidate 195778_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195782_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069
The candidate 195782_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:27:03.69 +20:16:02.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195788_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069
The candidate 195788_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:24:12.01 +21:26:26.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195790_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069
The candidate 195790_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:31:02.57 +25:10:28.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195800_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069
The candidate 195800_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:18:59.18 +25:56:57.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195808_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069
Preparing report for the candidate 195808_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195813_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069
The candidate 195813_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195815_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069
The candidate 195815_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195817_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069
The candidate 195817_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:23:53.66 +21:43:06.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.00, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.98)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 4.721 865943923173693696 110.97253657288 +21.71943535665 14.2300 13.4587 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#4.721#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195823_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069
The candidate 195823_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:19:00.06 +20:18:05.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195825_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069
Preparing report for the candidate 195825_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 49208_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069
The candidate 49208_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:01.97 +19:48:10.6 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.57, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.55)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 165521_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069
The candidate 165521_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:43:02.39 +23:26:57.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 177166_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069
The candidate 177166_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-29-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0069 did not pass the final checks
