This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_222825_TTUQ2b1x1_243368_uj1fjmrq
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 04 28.1440 2461158.6440 13.24 06:42:33.88 +27:16:54.3
187.43052 10.27604 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 7.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.42 Isis 2 0 2 13.5 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:42:33.88 +27:16:54.3: 16.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:42:33.88 +27:16:54.3: 16.06 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461158.6440,13.24,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260428.1440 13.24CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 04 28.1440 2461158.6440 13.69 07:03:23.77 +30:25:38.4
186.38418 15.72107 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 7.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.146 Lucina 2 -0 2 14.1 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:03:23.77 +30:25:38.4: 16.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:03:23.77 +30:25:38.4: 16.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461158.6440,13.69,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260428.1440 13.69CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.73602979 18.01.2026 05:39:42.974 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
First image: 2461058.73602979 18.01.2026 05:39:42.974 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Last image: 2461158.64432767 28.04.2026 03:27:39.911 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_222825_TTUQ2b1x1_243368_uj1fjmrq/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 2
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.57
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 6 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 20024
Objects passed selection criteria: 19891
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.6 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.6 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 13729.5
Average stars matched: 12950.2 (94.3243 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 124324 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Apr 21 18:08:25 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-27-g1ba0f777
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-21)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Apr 27 23:14:39 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.73602979 18.01.2026 05:39:42.974 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
First image: 2461058.73602979 18.01.2026 05:39:42.974 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Last image: 2461158.64432767 28.04.2026 03:27:39.911 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_222825_TTUQ2b1x1_243368_uj1fjmrq/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 99
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.24
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 49 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 140789
Objects passed selection criteria: 140415
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 100920
Average stars matched: 94680.8 (93.8176 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1901416 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Apr 21 18:08:25 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-27-g1ba0f777
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-21)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Apr 27 23:18:42 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_222825_TTUQ2b1x1_243368_uj1fjmrq/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-26-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_222825_TTUQ2b1x1_243368_uj1fjmrq/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_222825_TTUQ2b1x1_243368_uj1fjmrq/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-26-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_222825_TTUQ2b1x1_243368_uj1fjmrq/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461158.64371583
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits'
wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits'
wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-26-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-26-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-26-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-26-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits'
wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:00:00.353 +29:59:44.05 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-26-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-26-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:59:50.800 +29:56:31.30 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:00:00.353 +29:59:44.05
Second-epoch image center 06:59:50.800 +29:56:31.30
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0637 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:59:48.451 +29:56:58.67 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:00:00.353 +29:59:44.05
Second-epoch image center 06:59:48.451 +29:56:58.67
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0629 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 06:59:50.800 +29:56:31.30
Second-epoch second image center 06:59:48.451 +29:56:58.67
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01139 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits &> /tmp/tmp.zHbeowMs1y
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits &> /tmp/tmp.HWK8gO9OQg
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_222825_TTUQ2b1x1_243368_uj1fjmrq/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-26-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits &> /tmp/tmp.RIECp0Jtu6
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_222825_TTUQ2b1x1_243368_uj1fjmrq/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-26-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_222825_TTUQ2b1x1_243368_uj1fjmrq/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Dv0wilSBQ0
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_222825_TTUQ2b1x1_243368_uj1fjmrq/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits and wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits and wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits and wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 24243 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 95.2311 to 114.2882 deg, Dec +24.1626 to +35.3660 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 95.2311 to 114.2882 deg, Dec 24.1626 to 35.3660 deg
Loaded 15249 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10842 out of 11962 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11962 out of 24243 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.882669
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.882669
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.57
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.31
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.31
Magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 24243 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 95.2311 to 114.2882 deg, Dec +24.1626 to +35.3660 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 95.2311 to 114.2882 deg, Dec 24.1626 to 35.3660 deg
Loaded 15249 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10842 out of 11962 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11962 out of 24243 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits via Tycho-2
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits (aperture=6.1)
Read 24037 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 95.2309 to 114.2881 deg, Dec +24.1931 to +35.3694 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 95.2309 to 114.2881 deg, Dec 24.1931 to 35.3694 deg
Loaded 15192 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10819 out of 11947 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11947 out of 24037 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits via Tycho-2
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits (aperture=6.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 2 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
2.1 pix Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
2.5 pix fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-26-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits
2.5 pix fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
15.3 mag. Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
14.3 mag. fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-26-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.2 (SNR ) 11.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.zHbeowMs1y (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_222825_TTUQ2b1x1_243368_uj1fjmrq/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2293, passed=24243
Got 24243 stars (including 21925 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 24243 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 923 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23313 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23312 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23312 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 941 stars left (next iteration limit 1035)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits -region wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.HWK8gO9OQg (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_222825_TTUQ2b1x1_243368_uj1fjmrq/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2282, passed=24037
Got 24037 stars (including 21723 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 24037 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 921 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23060 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23059 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23059 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 942 stars left (next iteration limit 1036)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits -region wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.RIECp0Jtu6 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_222825_TTUQ2b1x1_243368_uj1fjmrq/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_222825_TTUQ2b1x1_243368_uj1fjmrq/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-26-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_222825_TTUQ2b1x1_243368_uj1fjmrq/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-26-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_222825_TTUQ2b1x1_243368_uj1fjmrq/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-26-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_222825_TTUQ2b1x1_243368_uj1fjmrq/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-26-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_222825_TTUQ2b1x1_243368_uj1fjmrq/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-26-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_222825_TTUQ2b1x1_243368_uj1fjmrq/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-26-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-26-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-26-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-26-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-26-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-26-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-26-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-26-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_222825_TTUQ2b1x1_243368_uj1fjmrq/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-26-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-26-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=659, passed=10530
Got 10530 stars (including 9859 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-26-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10530 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 938 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 918 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10206 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 938 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10206 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10206 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.64"
Excluding outliers - 934 stars left (next iteration limit 1027)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-26-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-26-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_222825_TTUQ2b1x1_243368_uj1fjmrq/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-26-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-26-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-26-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Dv0wilSBQ0 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_222825_TTUQ2b1x1_243368_uj1fjmrq/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_222825_TTUQ2b1x1_243368_uj1fjmrq/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_222825_TTUQ2b1x1_243368_uj1fjmrq/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_222825_TTUQ2b1x1_243368_uj1fjmrq/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_222825_TTUQ2b1x1_243368_uj1fjmrq/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_222825_TTUQ2b1x1_243368_uj1fjmrq/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_222825_TTUQ2b1x1_243368_uj1fjmrq/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_222825_TTUQ2b1x1_243368_uj1fjmrq/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=658, passed=10470
Got 10470 stars (including 9806 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10470 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 937 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 919 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10196 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 937 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10197 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10197 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.63"
Excluding outliers - 933 stars left (next iteration limit 1026)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_222825_TTUQ2b1x1_243368_uj1fjmrq/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-26-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-26-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_222825_TTUQ2b1x1_243368_uj1fjmrq/wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-26-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_222825_TTUQ2b1x1_243368_uj1fjmrq/wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 13804_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067
The candidate 13804_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:47:07.18 +30:16:34.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08801_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067
The candidate 08801_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:41:53.39 +27:57:23.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Gem-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_222825_TTUQ2b1x1_243368_uj1fjmrq/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-26-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_222825_TTUQ2b1x1_243368_uj1fjmrq/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_222825_TTUQ2b1x1_243368_uj1fjmrq/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-26-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_222825_TTUQ2b1x1_243368_uj1fjmrq/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-26-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-26-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:00:00.353 +29:59:44.05 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-26-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-26-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:59:50.800 +29:56:31.30 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:00:00.353 +29:59:44.05
Second-epoch image center 06:59:50.800 +29:56:31.30
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0637 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Image size: 937.3'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:59:48.451 +29:56:58.67 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:00:00.353 +29:59:44.05
Second-epoch image center 06:59:48.451 +29:56:58.67
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0629 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 06:59:50.800 +29:56:31.30
Second-epoch second image center 06:59:48.451 +29:56:58.67
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01139 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits &> /tmp/tmp.MgPtNxIRp7
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits &> /tmp/tmp.7hn4WZpKQX
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_222825_TTUQ2b1x1_243368_uj1fjmrq/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-26-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Nn8gMeELZM
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_222825_TTUQ2b1x1_243368_uj1fjmrq/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-26-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_222825_TTUQ2b1x1_243368_uj1fjmrq/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits &> /tmp/tmp.yx2WkcdEpO
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_222825_TTUQ2b1x1_243368_uj1fjmrq/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits and wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits and wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits and wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 167542 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 95.1866 to 114.3050 deg, Dec +24.1448 to +35.3665 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 95.1866 to 114.3050 deg, Dec 24.1448 to 35.3665 deg
Loaded 15341 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8753 out of 12230 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12230 out of 167542 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.731957
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.731957
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.24
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.49
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.49
Magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 167542 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 95.1866 to 114.3050 deg, Dec +24.1448 to +35.3665 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 95.1866 to 114.3050 deg, Dec 24.1448 to 35.3665 deg
Loaded 15341 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8753 out of 12230 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12230 out of 167542 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits via Tycho-2
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits (aperture=4.6)
Read 166985 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 95.2108 to 114.3113 deg, Dec +24.1637 to +35.3763 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 95.2108 to 114.3113 deg, Dec 24.1637 to 35.3763 deg
Loaded 15283 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8658 out of 12221 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12221 out of 166985 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits via Tycho-2
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits (aperture=4.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 82 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
1.9 pix Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
2.3 pix fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-26-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits
2.4 pix fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
1.9 pix wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
1.9 pix wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
15.5 mag. Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-26-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.4 (SNR ) 13.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.MgPtNxIRp7 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_222825_TTUQ2b1x1_243368_uj1fjmrq/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=38, blended=20873, passed=167504
Got 167504 stars (including 146353 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 167504 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 935 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 922 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 163582 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 935 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 163584 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 163585 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 935 stars left (next iteration limit 1028)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits -region wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.7hn4WZpKQX (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_222825_TTUQ2b1x1_243368_uj1fjmrq/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=45, blended=20907, passed=166940
Got 166940 stars (including 145746 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 166940 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 937 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 925 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 162832 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 937 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 162834 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 162835 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 937 stars left (next iteration limit 1030)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits -region wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Nn8gMeELZM (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_222825_TTUQ2b1x1_243368_uj1fjmrq/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_222825_TTUQ2b1x1_243368_uj1fjmrq/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-26-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_222825_TTUQ2b1x1_243368_uj1fjmrq/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-26-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_222825_TTUQ2b1x1_243368_uj1fjmrq/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-26-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_222825_TTUQ2b1x1_243368_uj1fjmrq/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-26-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_222825_TTUQ2b1x1_243368_uj1fjmrq/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-26-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_222825_TTUQ2b1x1_243368_uj1fjmrq/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-26-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-26-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-26-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-26-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-26-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-26-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-26-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-26-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_222825_TTUQ2b1x1_243368_uj1fjmrq/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-26-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-26-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=14, blended=4673, passed=71885
Got 71885 stars (including 67126 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-26-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 71885 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 925 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 69490 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 69490 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 69479 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Excluding outliers - 939 stars left (next iteration limit 1034)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-26-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-26-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_222825_TTUQ2b1x1_243368_uj1fjmrq/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-26-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-26-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-26-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.yx2WkcdEpO (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_222825_TTUQ2b1x1_243368_uj1fjmrq/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_222825_TTUQ2b1x1_243368_uj1fjmrq/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_222825_TTUQ2b1x1_243368_uj1fjmrq/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_222825_TTUQ2b1x1_243368_uj1fjmrq/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_222825_TTUQ2b1x1_243368_uj1fjmrq/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_222825_TTUQ2b1x1_243368_uj1fjmrq/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_222825_TTUQ2b1x1_243368_uj1fjmrq/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_222825_TTUQ2b1x1_243368_uj1fjmrq/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=19, blended=4585, passed=70856
Got 70856 stars (including 66208 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 70856 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 922 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 68502 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 68501 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 68488 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Excluding outliers - 936 stars left (next iteration limit 1030)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_222825_TTUQ2b1x1_243368_uj1fjmrq/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-26-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_222825_TTUQ2b1x1_243368_uj1fjmrq/wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-26-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_222825_TTUQ2b1x1_243368_uj1fjmrq/wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out190246.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out190276.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out196172.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out196214.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out196452.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out197344.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out197647.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out197869.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out198253.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_apass.txt__out198489.dat to exclusion_list_apass.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out196252.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out198134.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 45s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190246_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067
The candidate 190246_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:01:51.57 +32:21:56.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.22, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.20)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.281 890700630063297280 105.46447000377 +32.36590323144 14.2897 13.8019 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.281#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190254_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067
The candidate 190254_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:53:57.44 +26:08:30.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190266_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067
The candidate 190266_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:44.04 +31:07:20.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190270_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067
The candidate 190270_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:51:57.50 +29:27:22.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190274_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067
The candidate 190274_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:51:26.85 +27:25:14.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190276_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067
The candidate 190276_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:43:19.01 +26:58:23.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.00, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.98)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.253 3385734543485076992 100.82879883771 +26.97276947336 13.6093 13.2835 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.253#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190278_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067
The candidate 190278_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:43:17.71 +26:58:54.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190280_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067
The candidate 190280_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:23.47 +26:48:54.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190283_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067
The candidate 190283_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:21.17 +26:05:34.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191940_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067
The candidate 191940_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:57:06.67 +33:41:29.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192308_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067
The candidate 192308_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:53:43.97 +29:29:49.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193357_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067
The candidate 193357_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:11.03 +29:45:00.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193545_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067
The candidate 193545_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:54:52.19 +26:07:14.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193677_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067
The candidate 193677_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:00.57 +29:47:12.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193895_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067
The candidate 193895_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:45:39.23 +27:38:54.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193939_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067
The candidate 193939_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:46:17.73 +27:48:52.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194047_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067
The candidate 194047_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:54:05.58 +32:29:27.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194542_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067
The candidate 194542_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:56:52.81 +33:40:03.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194724_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067
The candidate 194724_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:49:04.66 +27:12:15.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195020_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067
The candidate 195020_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:49:15.61 +27:12:22.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195035_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067
The candidate 195035_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:46:25.28 +26:07:07.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195595_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067
The candidate 195595_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:01:55.43 +29:39:06.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195636_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067
The candidate 195636_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:43:22.85 +26:58:48.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195694_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067
The candidate 195694_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:03:49.76 +33:53:53.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195790_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067
The candidate 195790_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:53:52.47 +28:23:50.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195970_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067
The candidate 195970_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:10:49.33 +32:38:04.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196066_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067
The candidate 196066_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:08:05.49 +27:52:10.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196162_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067
The candidate 196162_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:22.85 +33:20:11.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196168_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067
The candidate 196168_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:50:21.44 +27:15:19.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196172_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067
The candidate 196172_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:43:15.88 +26:59:19.2 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.14, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.12)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196186_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067
The candidate 196186_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:13:12.66 +30:33:08.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196214_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067
The candidate 196214_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:43:21.35 +26:58:24.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.20, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.18)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.311 3385734543485071488 100.83937088335 +26.97408178682 13.3252 13.0779 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.311#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196252_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067
Preparing report for the candidate 196252_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196388_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067
The candidate 196388_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:58:03.22 +27:02:08.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196452_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067
The candidate 196452_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:43:15.31 +26:58:32.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.31, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.29)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 4.317 3385734509125343104 100.81319136677 +26.97671215026 13.1864 12.5213 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#4.317#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196464_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067
The candidate 196464_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:47:51.55 +26:54:36.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196697_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067
The candidate 196697_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:28.44 +26:04:30.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196826_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067
The candidate 196826_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:47:31.32 +30:38:35.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196928_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067
The candidate 196928_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:59.44 +33:13:27.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197019_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067
The candidate 197019_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:01:02.83 +29:43:44.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197093_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067
The candidate 197093_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:46:25.95 +31:14:17.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197157_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067
The candidate 197157_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:56:40.76 +31:22:25.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197188_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067
The candidate 197188_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:15.41 +27:44:29.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197325_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067
The candidate 197325_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:50:46.41 +26:19:43.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197344_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067
The candidate 197344_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:50:05.40 +26:59:46.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.56, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.54)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 5.242 3385148366347965696 102.52403804054 +26.99570237217 13.6318 13.1151 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#5.242#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197382_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067
The candidate 197382_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:11:39.58 +28:12:34.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197455_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067
The candidate 197455_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:04:16.99 +26:37:02.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197476_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067
The candidate 197476_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:13.67 +29:44:59.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197556_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067
The candidate 197556_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:40:35.10 +31:07:33.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197647_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067
The candidate 197647_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:54.81 +31:23:16.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.56, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.54)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 4.020 889798034095987968 106.47943442619 +31.38715056527 14.0156 13.3517 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#4.020#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197760_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067
The candidate 197760_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:55:20.99 +30:56:32.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197791_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067
The candidate 197791_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:49:13.65 +28:32:39.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197847_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067
The candidate 197847_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:38.27 +31:13:02.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197869_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067
The candidate 197869_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:08.24 +34:13:25.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.60, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.58)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 4.059 891375386605400704 107.28347031640 +34.22465088096 13.8442 13.2252 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#4.059#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198134_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067
Preparing report for the candidate 198134_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198178_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067
The candidate 198178_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:43:11.77 +26:58:05.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198253_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067
The candidate 198253_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:13.03 +27:46:52.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.66, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.64)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.502 884329235058428928 105.05399406050 +27.78157373346 14.0494 13.6073 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.502#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198338_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067
The candidate 198338_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:44:30.79 +29:00:16.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198359_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067
The candidate 198359_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:49.60 +26:19:05.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198369_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067
The candidate 198369_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:08:26.95 +33:15:24.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198489_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067
The candidate 198489_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:50:13.83 +32:44:58.0 in APASS (TIMEOUTCOMMAND_GAIA_VIZIER=#timeout 40 #, MAG_MEAN=13.62, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.60)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198538_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067
The candidate 198538_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:01:18.70 +32:26:02.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198641_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067
The candidate 198641_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:53:14.87 +32:12:11.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198642_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067
The candidate 198642_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:45:53.56 +26:47:13.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198669_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067
The candidate 198669_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:57:12.85 +30:35:13.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198692_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067
The candidate 198692_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:04:14.46 +29:10:51.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198996_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067
The candidate 198996_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:51.83 +27:10:48.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199212_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067
The candidate 199212_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:18:10.05 +33:21:05.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199215_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067
The candidate 199215_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:45:05.53 +30:05:48.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199476_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067
The candidate 199476_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:04:19.08 +29:12:44.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199952_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067
The candidate 199952_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:58.63 +27:40:19.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200006_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067
The candidate 200006_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:01:20.68 +29:56:55.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200206_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067
The candidate 200206_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:47:40.28 +33:10:43.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200531_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067
The candidate 200531_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:11.31 +26:25:41.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200926_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067
The candidate 200926_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:03:47.21 +30:28:53.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201048_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067
The candidate 201048_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:04:17.67 +29:57:54.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56983_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067
The candidate 56983_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:04:47.76 +28:07:13.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36451_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067
The candidate 36451_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:10:47.89 +26:59:03.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61074_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067
The candidate 61074_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:41:53.41 +27:57:23.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 121816_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067
The candidate 121816_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:38:32.97 +33:21:00.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96257_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067
The candidate 96257_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:47:07.18 +30:16:34.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25119_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067
The candidate 25119_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_22-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0067 did not pass the final checks